Neurobiological mechanisms by which nicotine mediates different types of anxiety

The effects of nicotine administration into the dorsal hippocampus and lateral septum provide further evidence that different neurochemical and neuroanatomical substrates control behaviour in different animal tests. Thus, in the social interaction test (a model of generalised anxiety disorder), bilateral administration of nicotine (1-4 microg) into both regions has anxiogenic effects in test conditions that generate moderate anxiety. The anxiogenic effects are mediated by a nicotine-evoked increase in 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) release and are reversed by co-administration of the 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist, N-(2-(6-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl)ethyl)-N-(2-pyridyl)-cyclohex -ane carboxamide trichloride (WAY 100,635). On trial 1 in the elevated plus-maze (which models the escape components of panic disorder), nicotine is without effect when administered to the dorsal hippocampus, but has anxiogenic effects after lateral septal administration. On trial 2 in the elevated plus-maze (a model of specific phobia), nicotine (1 microg) has anxiolytic effects when administered to the dorsal hippocampus, but is ineffective (4 and 8 microg) in the lateral septum.     

Methyllycaconitine (MLA) blocks the nicotine evoked anxiogenic effect and 5-HT release in the dorsal hippocampus: possible role of alpha7 receptors

Nicotine has bimodal effects on anxiety, with low doses having an anxiolytic effect and high doses having an anxiogenic effect. The dorsal hippocampus is one of the brain areas that mediate the anxiogenic effect of nicotine through enhanced 5-HT release, but the nAChR subtype(s) that mediate these effects are not known. Intrahippocampal administration of a high dose of nicotine (1 micro g, 4.3 mM) had an anxiogenic effect in the social interaction test that was reversed by co-administration of a behaviourally inactive dose (1.9 ng, 4.3 micro M) of methyllycaconitine (MLA), which is an antagonist at alpha7 and alpha3 nAChR subunits. At a dose (0.8 ng, 4.3 micro ;M) at which its actions would be specific to alpha4beta2 and alpha3beta2 nAChRs dihydro-beta-erythroidine (DHbetaE) was unable to reverse nicotine's anxiogenic effect. Reversal was obtained with a 10-fold higher, but receptor non-specific concentration of DHbetaE (7.8ng, 43 micro M), suggesting that the DHbetaE reversal might have been due to action at alpha7 nAChRs. Exposure of hippocampal slices to MLA (0.25, 05, 1 and 10 micro M) significantly reduced the increase in [(3)H]5-HT release evoked by nicotine (100 micro M). DHbetaE (0.1-0.5 micro M) failed to reverse this effect of nicotine on [(3)H]5-HT release, although higher concentrations (1 and 10 micro M), at which alpha7 subunits would also be affected, were able to do so. Because of the lack of effects of low, receptor specific concentrations of DHbetaE, it is more likely that the MLA reversal of both nicotine's anxiogenic effect and its stimulation of [(3)H]5-HT release is due to action at alpha7 than at alpha3 units. This is perhaps also more likely because the alpha7 receptors are highly expressed in the dorsal hippocampus, whereas the alpha3 subunits are much less abundant. However, what is most important is that, in the dorsal hippocampus, nicotine's anxiogenic effect and induced release of [(3)H]5-HT are mediated by non alpha4beta2 nAChRs, which contrasts with the previously reported anxiolytic effect of a low dose of nicotine which is mediated by alpha4beta2 nAChRs within the dorsal raphé nucleus. Thus the anxiolytic and anxiogenic effects of nicotine can be distinguished both by brain region and by nicotinic receptor subtype.     

Modulation of behaviour on trials 1 and 2 in the elevated plus-maze test of anxiety after systemic and hippocampal administration of nicotine

  Rationale: The elevated plus-maze provides a test situation in which distinctive states of anxiety are elicited on trials 1 and 2 and the dorsal hippocampus has previously been shown to mediate the anxiogenic effects of (–)-nicotine in the social interaction test. Objective: To determine the effects of a wide dose range of (–)-nicotine on trial 1 and 2 in the plus-maze after systemic administration and whether the dorsal hippocampus is a site mediating the anxiogenic effect of nicotine. Methods: (–)-Nicotine (0.001, 0.005, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5 and 1 mg/kg) was injected IP 30 min before testing for 5 min in the plus-maze. Rats receiving dorsal hippocampal infusions received bilateral infusions of 0.5 μl of artificial CSF or (–)-nicotine (0.1, 1, 4 or 8 μg). The needle was left in place for 50 s after injection and testing took place 3 min later. Rats tested on trial 1 were naive to the plus-maze, those tested on trial 2 had received a previous 5-min undrugged exposure to the maze 48 h earlier. Results: Low doses of (–)-nicotine (0.001, 0.005, 0.01, 0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg, IP) were without effect on either trial, but higher doses (0.5 and 1 mg/kg, IP) had anxiogenic effects on both trials, as shown by decreases in percentage time spent and percentage entries onto the open arms. Infusion of (–)-nicotine (0.1, 1, 4 and 8 μg) bilaterally into the dorsal hippocampus was without effect on trial 1, but 1 μg had an anxiolytic effect on trial 2, shown by an increased percentage time spent on the open arms. Conclusions: The results on both trials in the plus-maze after systemic administration of nicotine add to previous reports from the social interaction test that high doses of nicotine have anxiogenic effects. However, the effects of nicotine in the dorsal hippocampus are different in all three anxiety tests (anxiogenic in social interaction, ineffective on trial 1, anxiolytic on trial 2) showing that nicotinic cholinergic control in this brain region may vary depending on the state and/or type of anxiety generated by the test. The brain region(s) underlying the anxiogenic effects of IP nicotine on both trials in the plus-maze remain to be identified. Received: 16 August 1998 / Final version: 10 December 1998     

Anxiolytic effects of aniracetam in three different mouse models of anxiety and the underlying mechanism.

The anxiolytic effects of aniracetam have not been proven in animals despite its clinical usefulness for post-stroke anxiety. This study, therefore, aimed to characterize the anxiolytic effects of aniracetam in different anxiety models using mice and to examine the mode of action. In a social interaction test in which all classes (serotonergic, cholinergic and dopaminergic) of compounds were effective, aniracetam (10-100 mg/kg) increased total social interaction scores (time and frequency), and the increase in the total social interaction time mainly reflected an increase in trunk sniffing and following. The anxiolytic effects were completely blocked by haloperidol and nearly completely by mecamylamine or ketanserin, suggesting an involvement of nicotinic acetylcholine, 5-HT2A and dopamine D2 receptors in the anxiolytic mechanism. Aniracetam also showed anti-anxiety effects in two other anxiety models (elevated plus-maze and conditioned fear stress tests), whereas diazepam as a positive control was anxiolytic only in the elevated plus-maze and social interaction tests. The anxiolytic effects of aniracetam in each model were mimicked by different metabolites (i.e., p-anisic acid in the elevated plus-maze test) or specific combinations of metabolites. These results indicate that aniracetam possesses a wide range of anxiolytic properties, which may be mediated by an interaction between cholinergic, dopaminergic and serotonergic systems. Thus, our findings suggest the potential usefulness of aniracetam against various types of anxiety-related disorders and social failure/impairments.     

Do different mechanisms underlie two anxiogenic effects of systemic nicotine?

Alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (alpha7 nAChRs) and 5-hydroxytryptamine 1A (5-HT1A) receptors have been implicated in the anxiogenic effects of centrally administered nicotine, but the receptors that mediate the anxiogenic effects of systemic nicotine are not known. This study explored whether competitive nAChR antagonists [dihydro-beta-erythroidine (DHbetaE), 4 mg/kg, and methyllycaconitine (MLA), 5 mg/kg], and a 5-HT1A receptor antagonist (WAY 100635, 0.5 and 1 mg/kg) could block the effects of two anxiogenic doses of nicotine in the social interaction test of anxiety. The anxiogenic effect of 0.1 mg/kg nicotine, given 5 min before the test, was blocked by DHbetaE and WAY 100635, establishing roles for alpha4beta2 nAChRs and 5-HT1A receptors. None of the antagonists could block the effect of 0.45 mg/kg nicotine, given 30 min before the test, precluding firm conclusions about the mechanisms underlying this anxiogenic effect. However, there was evidence for a role of alpha7 nAChRs in mediating an endogenous anxiogenic tone, since MLA itself had an anxiolytic effect that was blocked by both doses of nicotine. Thus, both alpha7 and alpha4beta2 nAChRs might have a role in mediating the anxiogenic effects of nicotine.     

Anxiogenic effects of nicotine in the dorsal hippocampus are mediated by 5-HT1A and not by muscarinic M1 receptors

After direct administration into the dorsal hippocampus nicotine decreased the time spent in social interaction, without changing locomotor activity, indicating an anxiogenic effect. The possibility that post-synaptic M1 muscarinic receptors mediated this effect was examined by determining whether dorsal hippocampal administration of a specific M1 receptor agonist (McN-A-343) had anxiogenic effects, and whether the anxiogenic effect of nicotine could be reversed by co-administration of the M1 receptor antagonist, pirenzepine. McN-A-343 (0.3, 1.6, 3.2, 15.8 nmol) was without effect on social interaction, and pirenzepine (0.7 and 2.4 nmol) injection into the dorsal hippocampus failed to reverse the decrease in social interaction caused by nicotine (6.3 nmol) injection into this area. However, the decrease in social interaction after nicotine (50 nmol) was completely reversed by the specific 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY 100635 (0.4 nmol) after co-administration of both drugs into the dorsal hippocampus. Thus, the anxiogenic effect of nicotine in this brain region seems to be mediated by 5-HT1A, but not M1, receptors. In contrast to the effect of nicotine in naive animals, those retested after a second injection of 50 nmol did not show a significant anxiogenic effect. The theoretical implications of this are discussed and from a practical point of view this suggests caution in the retesting of animals after central injections.     

Nicotinic--serotonergic interactions in brain and behaviour

This review focuses on nicotinic--serotonergic interactions in the central nervous system (CNS). Nicotine increases 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) release in the cortex, striatum, hippocampus, dorsal raphé nucleus (DRN), hypothalamus, and spinal cord. As yet, there is little firm evidence for nicotinic receptors on serotonergic terminals and thus nicotine's effects on 5-HT may not necessarily be directly mediated, but there is strong evidence that the 5-HT tone plays a permissive role in nicotine's effects. The effects in the cortex, hippocampus, and DRN involve stimulation of 5-HT(1A) receptors, and in the striatum, 5-HT(3) receptors. The 5-HT(1A) receptors in the DRN play a role in mediating the anxiolytic effects of nicotine and the 5-HT(1A) receptors in the dorsal hippocampus and lateral septum mediate its anxiogenic effects. The increased startle and anxiety during nicotine withdrawal is mediated by 5-HT(1A) and 5-HT(3) receptors. The locomotor stimulant effect of acute nicotine is mediated by 5-HT(1A) receptors and 5-HT(2) receptors may play a role in the expression of a sensitised response after chronic nicotine treatment. Unfortunately, the role of 5-HT(1A) receptors in mediating nicotine seeking has not yet been investigated and would seem an important area for future research. There is also evidence for nicotinic--serotonergic interactions in the acquisition of the water maze, passive avoidance, and impulsivity in the five-choice serial reaction task.     

Chronic fluoxetine in tests of anxiety in rat lines selectively bred for differential 5-HT1A receptor function

Selective breeding for high and low sensitivity to the hypothermic response induced by the 5-HT1A receptor agonist 8- OH-DPAT has established two lines of rat (HDS and LDS, respectively) whose behavior differs in a model of depression and in the social interaction test of anxiety. The HDS line has a higher level of anxiety and, furthermore, does not display the usual anxiogenic response to intrahippocampal administration of 8-OH-DPAT. It was therefore hypothesized that this line of rat might be a useful model of high trait anxiety with a susceptibility to depression. We thus investigated whether chronic treatment with fluoxetine would result in an anxiolytic effect in the social interaction test in the LDS and HDS lines of rat. In both lines, acute fluoxetine (10 mg/kg) produced an anxiogenic effect in the social interaction test; when rats were tested 24 h after 14 days of fluoxetine treatment there were no anxiolytic effects in either line. In the social interaction test, chronic fluoxetine treatment did not change either the anxiogenic effect of 8-OH-DPAT (100 ng) injected bilaterally into the dorsal hippocampus in the LDS line or the lack of response in the HDS line. In the elevated plus-maze, chronic fluoxetine treatment resulted in a significant anxiogenic effect in the HDS line, but was without effect in the LDS line. Intrahippocampal 8-OH-DPAT was without effect in the plus-maze in either line. These results suggest that chronic treatment with fluoxetine did not modify the hippocampal 5-HT1A receptor in either line. The anxiogenic effects observed in the plus-maze in the HDS line after chronic fluoxetine might relate to line differences in 5-HT1A receptors in other brain regions.     

Roles of 5-HT(1A) receptors in the dorsal raphe and dorsal hippocampus in anxiety assessed by the behavioral effects of 8-OH-DPAT and S 15535 in a modified Geller-Seifter conflict model

8-OH-DPAT [8-hydroxy-2-(di-N-propylamino)tetralin], a 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist, and S 15535 (4-benzodioxan-5-yl)1-(indan-2-yl)piperazine, a partial agonist at 5-HT(1A) receptors, were administered into the dorsal raphe nucleus and dorsal hippocampus and their behavioral effects were assessed in a modified Geller-Seifter conflict model. Injected into the dorsal raphe nucleus 8-OH-DPAT, 1 microg but not 0.04 or 0.2 microg 0.5 microl(-1), and S 15535, 2.5 microg but not 0.1 or 0.5 microg 0.5 microl(-1), significantly increased punished responding with no effect on rates of unpunished or time-out responding. WAY 100635, a selective 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist, injected subcutaneously at 0. 3 mg kg(-1) 30 min before 1 microg 8-OH-DPAT or 2.5 microg S 15535 in the dorsal raphe, completely antagonized their effects on punished responding. At doses ranging from 1 to 10 microg microl(-1) injected into the CA1 region of the dorsal hippocampus neither 8-OH-DPAT nor S 15535 modified punished responding or the rates of time-out. At the highest doses, 8-OH-DPAT significantly reduced unpunished responding whereas S 15535 had the opposite effect. The results suggest that stimulation of 5-HT(1A) receptors in the dorsal raphe nucleus has anxiolytic-like effects whereas stimulation of postsynaptic receptors in the dorsal hippocampus has no anxiolytic or anxiogenic effects, at least judging from changes in rates of punished responding. These results are compatible with the hypothesis that 5-HT(1A) receptor agonists and partial agonists attenuate anxiety by reducing serotonergic transmission in brain areas innervated by the dorsal raphe nucleus.     

Acute and chronic effects of gepirone and fluoxetine in rats tested in the elevated plus-maze: an ethological analysis

The potential role of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) in anxiety has been the subject of much research, most of it addressed to the hypothesis that 5-HT promotes anxiety and, therefore, that drugs that reduce 5-HT functions will be effective anxiolytic agents in human anxiety disorders. However, the effects of serotoninergic drugs in different behavioral paradigms have been inconsistent. These inconsistencies have been particularly well illustrated in the elevated plus-maze. In the present study we provided an ethopharmacological analysis (in addition to conventional measures) of the behavior of rats in the elevated plus-maze with transparent walls after acute and chronic treatments with gepirone, an agonist of 5-HT1A receptors, and fluoxetine, a selective inhibitor of serotonin reuptake. Although gepirone has been used to treat anxiety, fluoxetine is a mainstay in the treatment of depression. Acute treatment with gepirone (1, 3, 5.6, and 10 mg/kg, IP) produced an anxiogenic profile with increased risk assessment behaviors (e.g., flat-back approach) and decreased behavioral measures that are inversely related to "anxiety" (e.g., head dipping and end-arm activity). In contrast, chronic gepirone (10 mg/kg day, PO) produced an opposite effect showing an anxiolytic profile that is consistent with the clinical use of this drug, which shows efficacy after 2-4 weeks of treatment. Acute fluoxetine (5.6 and 10 mg/kg, IP) also produced an anxiogenic profile with reduced head dipping and end-arm activity. On the other hand, chronic fluoxetine (10 mg/kg day, PO) had no effect on any of the behavioral measures. These data demonstrate: (a) the anxiogenic and anxiolytic effects of acute and chronic gepirone, respectively, corroborate with the observed effects of these treatments in the clinic; (b) similarly, the anxiogenic effects of acute fluoxetine observed here have also been reported in clinical studies with 5-HT reuptake blockers. This class of compounds has not been systematically used as anxiolytic; (c) the elevated plus-maze with transparent walls shows good sensitivity for evaluating serotonergic drugs with anxiogenic and anxiolytic profile.     

Selective agonists and antagonists for 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor subtypes, and interactions with yohimbine and FG 7142 using the elevated plus-maze test in the rat

The effects of some 5-HT receptor ligands were investigated on measures of anxiety in an elevated plus-maze test in the rat. Quipazine (2 and 4 mg kg-1), a non-specific 5-HT agonist and ritanserin (0.25-10 mg kg-1), a 5-HT2 receptor antagonist displayed anxiogenic profiles by reducing both of the measures of anxiety used in this test. Two 5-HT1A receptor ligands, buspirone (4 and 8 mg kg-1) and ipsapirone (2.5-10 mg kg-1) and the 5-HT1 agonist, RU 24969 (0.1875-1.5 mg kg-1) significantly reduced only the percentage of time spent on the open arms. (-)-Propranolol (5 and 10 mg kg-1), a 5-HT1 receptor antagonist significantly reduced only the percentage of entries made onto the open arms. Metergoline (4 mg kg-1), a non-specific 5-HT antagonist displayed anxiolytic effects in this test by increasing both measures of anxiety. The 5-HT1A receptor agonist, 8-OH-DPAT (0.0625-0.25 mg kg-1) had no effect on either of the measures of anxiety. The results from the non-specific ligands (quipazine and metergoline) are consistent with the theory that a reduction in 5-HT function reduces anxiety. However, in spite of their more selective effects on 5-HT receptors the results in this test from the more specific ligands are not consistent with a strong involvement of any single receptor subtype. The interaction studies with yohimbine and FG 7142 (beta-carboline-3-carboxylate methylamide) provided no clear evidence for a major role of 5-HT pathways in the mediation of their anxiogenic effects.     

The dorsal raphé nucleus is a crucial structure mediating nicotine's anxiolytic effects and the development of tolerance and withdrawal responses

RATIONALE: Smokers frequently report that they obtain anxiety-reducing (anxiolytic) effects from smoking, and this may be one factor which contributes to nicotine dependence. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the role of the dorsal raphé nucleus (DRN) in mediating the acute anxiolytic effect of nicotine, the development of tolerance to this effect and the anxiogenic response observed on withdrawal from chronic nicotine. METHODS: The social interaction test of anxiety was used to investigate the effects of a range of doses of (-)-nicotine (2.5-4000 ng) following DRN infusion, and whether co-administration of the specific 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY 100635 could antagonise the anxiolytic action of nicotine. We then examined the effects of intra-DRN nicotine (2.5-7 ng) following six daily injections of subcutaneous (s.c.) (-)-nicotine (0.1 mg/kg). Finally, we examined whether s.c. or intra-DRN (-)-nicotine could antagonise the anxiogenic response seen 72 h after the termination of 7 days of nicotine treatment. RESULTS: Acute nicotine administration into the DRN produced dose-related effects: low doses (2.5-10 ng) induced an anxiolytic effect, intermediate doses were behaviourally silent (100-1000 ng), and an anxiogenic effect was seen following administration of a high dose (4 micrograms). The anxiolytic effect of (-)-nicotine (5 ng) was reversed by co-administration of a behaviourally inactive dose of WAY 100635 (200 ng). Following 6 days of treatment with s.c. 0.1 mg/kg per day (-)-nicotine, tolerance developed to its anxiolytic action in the DRN. Rats withdrawn for 72 h following this chronic treatment showed an anxiogenic response which was reversed by (-)-nicotine injected s.c. (0.1 mg/kg) or into the DRN (5 ng). CONCLUSIONS: The present findings therefore suggest that the DRN plays an important role in mediating the acute effects of nicotine on anxiety, as measured in the social interaction test, and that the anxiolytic effect is mediated by activation of somatodendritic 5-HT1A autoreceptors. The DRN is also concerned with mediating the development of tolerance to nicotine's anxiolytic effects and because there is an anxiogenic response 72 h after withdrawal from chronic nicotine, this suggests that an oppositional, compensatory mechanism is mediating the tolerance.     

Involvement of 5-HT1A receptors in behavioural effects of the cannabinoid receptor agonist CP 55,940 in male rats

We have studied the possible interaction between the cannabinoid receptor agonist CP 55,940 (1 and 50 microg/kg) and the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY 100635 (1 mg/kg) in the modulation of plus-maze and holeboard activity in Wistar adult male rats. In the plus-maze, the higher dose of CP 55,940 induced an anxiogenic-like effect, whereas the lower dose induced anxiolytic-like responses. The 5-HT1A antagonist, which was silent in this test, attenuated the anxiogenic, but not the anxiolytic, effect of CP 55,940. In the holeboard, the higher dose of CP 55,940 significantly decreased head-dipping duration, and WAY 100635, which did not affect exploratory head-dipping when administered alone, antagonized this effect. The administration of WAY 100635 significantly increased grooming behaviour, and this effect was inhibited by the two doses of CP 55,940, which did not exert any effect, per se, on this parameter. We provide the first evidence implicating 5-HT1A receptors in anxiety-related behavioural responses to a cannabinoid agonist.     

Nicotine potentiates sulpiride-induced catalepsy in mice

The effects of nicotine on sulpiride-induced catalepsy in mice were investigated. Sulpiride (12.5-100 mg/kg) induced a low degree of catalepsy in mice which was dose dependent. Nicotine (0.0001-1 mg/kg) caused an even lower degree of catalepsy. When the drugs were co-administered a much higher cataleptogenic response was obtained. The potentiation of the effect of sulpiride by nicotine was elicited by 0.5 mg/kg or higher doses of the drug. The central nicotinic receptor antagonist mecamylamine (1-3 mg/kg) and the peripheral antagonist hexamethonium (5 and 10 mg/kg) decreased the response induced by the combination of nicotine and sulpiride. Higher doses of the cholinoceptor antagonist atropine (10 mg/kg) also reduced the catalepsy induced by the drug combination. It is concluded that nicotine potentiates sulpiride-induced catalepsy through activation of cholinergic mechanism(s) and that the central nicotinic mechanism mediates nicotine's action.     

Relationship between up-regulation of nicotine binding sites in rat brain and delayed cognitive enhancement observed after chronic or acute nicotinic receptor stimulation

(–)-Nicotine tartrate (2 mg/kg), and a nicotinic agonist, RJR 2403 (1.4 mg/kg), and antagonist, mecamylamine (1 mg/kg), were administered to separate groups of rats SC twice daily for 10 days. Two other groups received the same doses of nicotine or RJR 2403 for 1 day followed by saline for 9 days. Twenty-four hours after the final injection, the rats were compared to a 10-day saline-injected group on acquisition of a hidden platform position in the Morris water maze (20 trials, 30-min inter-trial interval). The rats were killed 48 h after the last drug injection and frontal, entorhinal and posterior cingulate cortex and dorsal and ventral hippocampus assayed for [³H]-nicotine binding density. Chronic nicotine significantly increased the number of frontal and entorhinal cortical and dorsal hippocampal, but not posterior cingulate cortical or ventral hippocampal, nicotinic receptors, and improved rate of learning. Chronic mecamylamine and RJR 2403 also significantly increased the number of nicotinic receptors in frontal cortex, though not other regions, but retarded rate of learning. Nicotine given for 1 day 11 days earlier marginally increased nicotinic receptors in entorhinal cortex (but not other regions) and significantly increased rate of learning, though significantly less than 10-day nicotine. Entorhinal cortical and dorsal hippocampal nicotinic receptor numbers were positively associated with rate of learning but not performance at asymptote. Thus cognitive enhancement after chronic nicotine is in part a delayed consequence of nicotine administration 11 days earlier, and may reflect regional changes in nicotinic receptor up-regulation.     

Serotonergic involvement in the amelioration of behavioral abnormalities in dopamine transporter knockout mice by nicotine

Dopamine transporter knockout (DAT KO) mice exhibit elevated extracellular dopamine levels in brain regions that include the striatum and the nucleus accumbens, but not the prefrontal cortex. DAT KO mice model some aspects of psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia. Smoking is more common in patients with schizophrenia, suggesting that nicotine might ameliorate aspects of the behavioral abnormalities and/or treatment side effects seen in these individuals. We report nicotine-induced normalization of effects on locomotion and prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle (PPI) in DAT KO mice that require intact serotonin 5-HT1A systems. First, we observed that the marked hyperactivity displayed by DAT KO mice was reduced by administration of nicotine. This nicotine effect was blocked by pretreatment with the non-specific nicotinic acetylcholine (nACh) receptor antagonist mecamylamine, or the 5-HT1A antagonist WAY100635. Secondly, we examined the effects of nicotine on PPI in DAT KO mice. Treatment with nicotine significantly ameliorated the PPI deficits observed in DAT KO mice. The ameliorating action of nicotine on PPI deficits in DAT KO mice was blocked by mecamylamine, the α(7) nACh receptor antagonist methyllycaconitine or WAY100635, while the α(4)β(2) nACh receptor antagonist dihydro-β-erythroidinehydrobromide (DHβE) produced only a non-significant trend toward attenuation of nicotine effects. Finally, we observed that administration of the 5-HT1A receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT also ameliorated the deficit in PPI observed in DAT KO mice. This amelioration was antagonized by pretreatment with WAY100635. These data support the idea that nicotine might ameliorate some of the cognitive dysfunctions found in schizophrenia in a 5-HT1A-dependent fashion. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Cognitive Enhancers'.     

Nicotine-induced hypothermia through an indirect dopaminergic mechanism

The effect of nicotine on core body temperature was studied in mice. Intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of nicotine (0.5, 1 and 2 mg/kg) induced a dose-dependent hypothermia. The response was inhibited by reserpine (5 mg/kg), the centrally active nicotinic receptor antagonist mecamylamine (0.1-1 mg/kg) and the D-2 dopamine receptor antagonist sulpiride (25-100 mg/kg). The β-adrenoceptor antagonist propranolol (5 and 10 mg/kg) and the serotonergic blocker methysergide (5 and 10 mg/kg) did not inhibit but increased the nicotine response. The α-adrenoceptor antagonist phenoxybenzamine, the antimuscarinic agent atropine, the D-1 dopamine receptor antagonist SCH 23390, the peripheral dopamine antagonist domperidone and the peripheral nicotinic antagonist hexamethonium did not alter the nicotine-induced hypothermia. It is concluded that nicotine may cause a fall in core body temperature through a central dopaminergic mechanism.     

Morphine-induced place preference: involvement of cholinergic receptors of the ventral tegmental area

In the present study, the effects of intra-ventral tegmental area injections of cholinergic agents on morphine-induced conditioned place preference were investigated by using an unbiased 3-day schedule of place conditioning design in rats. The conditioning treatments with subcutaneous injections of morphine (0.5-7.5 mg/kg) induced a significant dose-dependent conditioned place preference for the drug-associated place. Intra-ventral tegmental area injection of an anticholinesterase, physostigmine (2.5 and 5 microg/rat) or nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist, nicotine (0.5 and 1 microg/rat) with an ineffective dose of morphine (0.5 mg/kg) elicited a significant conditioned place preference. Furthermore, intra-ventral tegmental area administration of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist, atropine (1-4 microg/rat) or nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist, mecamylamine (5 and 7.5 microg/rat) dose-dependently inhibited the morphine (5 mg/kg)-induced place preference. Atropine or mecamylamine reversed the effect of physostigmine or nicotine on morphine response respectively. The injection of physostigmine, but not atropine, nicotine or mecamylamine, into the ventral tegmental area alone produced a significant place aversion. Moreover, intra-ventral tegmental area administration of the higher doses of physostigmine or atropine, but not nicotine or mecamylamine decreased the locomotor activity. We conclude that muscarinic and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the ventral tegmental area may critically mediate the rewarding effects of morphine.     

Anxiogenic activity of Myristica fragrans seeds.

In the present study, the n-hexane extract of Myristica fragrans (MF) seeds, acetone-insoluble part of the n-hexane extract (AIMF) and trimyristin (TM) were assessed for their anxiogenic activity. The MF (10 and 30 mg/kg), AIMF (30, 100, and 300 mg/kg), and TM (10, 30, and 100 mg/kg) administered intraperitoneally exhibited anxiogenic activity in elevated plus-maze (EPM) paradigm. The open-field test and hole-board test were also used to assess anxiogenic activity of AIMF and TM. In the EPM test, MF, AIMF, and TM decreased the time spent by mice in the open arm and the entries in the open arm. Further, the effect of diazepam (1 mg/kg i.p.), serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, ondansetron (1 mg/kg i.p.), and 5-HT1A receptor agonist, buspirone (1 mg/kg i.p.), on the occupancy in open arm and entries in open arm was significantly reduced by TM. In the open-field test, AIMF as well as TM reduced the number of rearing and locomotion. Both TM and AIMF reduced the number of head pock in the hole-board test. Inhibition of anxiolytic activity of ondansetron (5-HT3 receptor antagonist), buspirone (5-HT1A receptor agonist), and diazepam [acting on gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABAA) receptor] suggests a nonspecific anxiogenic activity of TM and also a link between 5-HT and GABA systems in the anxiogenic activity of TM.     

Effects of nociceptin on the exploratory behavior of mice in the hole-board test

The effects of nociceptin on the exploratory behavior of mice were examined using an automatic hole-board apparatus. A low dose of nociceptin (0.01 nmol, i.c.v.) had an anxiolytic effect, as reflected by an increase in head-dipping behavior. However, high doses of nociceptin (1-5 nmol, i.c.v.) produced a dose-dependent anxiogenic effect, as reflected by a decrease in head-dipping behavior. Both the anxiolytic and anxiogenic effects of nociceptin were antagonized by nocistatin, an opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor antagonist. Although a low dose (0.01 nmol, i.c.v.) of nociceptin significantly increased the rate of serotonin (5-hyroxytryptamine, 5-HT) turnover in the hippocampus, a high dose (5 nmol, i.c.v.) of nociceptin significantly decreased this turnover in the amygdala. Furthermore, the anxiolytic effect of nociceptin at a low dose was antagonized by N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl] ethyl]-N-(2-pyridinyl) cyclo-hexanecarboxamide 3HCl (WAY100635), a 5-HT1A receptor antagonist. On the other hand, the anxiogenic effect of nociceptin at a high dose was antagonized by R(+)-2-dipropylamino-8-hydroxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene hydrobromide (8-OH-DPAT), a 5-HT1A receptor agonist. In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that nociceptin has dose-related anxiolytic and anxiogenic effects as a result of the activation of ORL1 receptors. The present results also suggest that a low dose of nociceptin has an anxiolytic effect via the activation of 5-HT ergic function in the hippocampus, while a high dose of nociceptin has an anxiogenic effect via the inhibition of 5-HT ergic function in the amygdala.