Evaluation by thoracic impedance cardiography of diazepam, placebo, and two drug combinations for intravenous sedation of dental outpatients

The cardiovascular and respiratory effects of three common intravenous premedicants were examined noninvasively in a population of 20 dental outpatients scheduled for surgical removal of third-molars. Two third molars from one side of the mouth were removed at each appointment. Group 1 received a diazepam titration (mean dose = 25.6 mgs) at one appointment and placebo at the other appointment. Group 2 received a combination of diazepam (12.5 mg), fentanyl (0.1 mg), and methohexital (mean dose = 18.0 mg) at one appointment and the combination of diazepam (15.0 mg) and methohexital (mean dose = 27.0 mg) at the other appointment. Noninvasive measurement of cardiac output revealed little change during intravenous drug administration, but a significant increase was seen in all groups following local anesthesia and during surgery. Heart rate was elevated and stroke volume decreased during administration of the two-drug combinations. Oxygen saturation was greatly decreased following the combination of diazepam, fentanyl, and methohexital. These findings indicate that the combination of diazepam, fentanyl, and methohexital results in decreased oxygen saturation, a transient decrease in stroke volume, and an elevated heart rate when used as an intravenous premedicant for dental outpatients.     

Monitored anesthesia care for dental implant surgery: analysis of effectiveness and complications

The optimal method of providing safe and effective sedation for outpatients undergoing lengthy dental operations is unclear. We provided monitored anesthesia care (conscious sedation) for 102 consecutive dental implant procedures, using intravenous midazolam and fentanyl as primary pharmacologic agents. Midazolam was administered by multiple, intermittent injection or via continuous infusion. The dose of midazolam required for the induction of sedation ranged from 3.4 +/- 1.6 mg to 4.0 +/- 2.0 mg. Maintenance of adequate sedation required a mean midazolam administration rate of 4.0 +/- 2.1 mg/h to 5.1 +/- 2.1 mg/h, and a mean fentanyl administration rate of 54 +/- 29 mcg/h to 60 +/- 27 mcg/h. Continuous monitoring allowed for rapid detection and treatment of 40 separate hemodynamic and respiratory problems. There was no evidence of patient injury, and all patients returned home on the day of surgery. A post-operative telephone survey revealed that 65% of patients had complete amnesia for operative events, 96% were satisfied with monitored anesthesia care, and 94% would desire a similar anesthetic technique for future procedures.     

Conscious sedation by rectal administration of midazolam or midazolam plus ketamine as alternatives to general anesthesia for dental treatment of uncooperative children

The trial included 24 children (aged 2–7 yr) referred for dental treatment under general anesthesia, since conventional behavioral management methods had failed to achieve treatment acceptance. As an alternative, they received, on two separate occasions with "identical" dental treatment, conscious sedation by rectal administration of either midazolam (0.3 mg/kg body weight (bwt)) or midazolam (0.3 mg/kg bwt) plus ketamine (1.0 mg/kg bwt). This allowed a double-blind, crossover design. The aims were to assess conscious sedation, combined with local anesthesia, as an alternative to general anesthesia, and further to evaluate the effects obtained by addition of a low dose of ketamine to rectally administered midazolam. The feasibility of dental treatment was rated as excellent or good for 16 of the 24 children when premedicated with midazolam, and for 18 of the 24 children when ketamine was added to midazolam. At least some treatment could be given to all children. Verbal contact was maintained with all children throughout both treatment sessions. The children were significantly less anxious when they arrived for the second session. Amnesia and drowsiness were significantly increased when ketamine was added to midazolam. The combination also tended to be more efficient in relief of anxiety and prevention of pain, but there were large variations in the children's responses to the drugs. Midazolam significantly reduced the blood oxygen level, but not with ketamine added. For most children, both regimens proved to be appropriate as alternatives to general anesthesia. From a pharmacologic point of view, the combination of midazolam and ketamine appears to be reasonable because 1) both drugs have sedative and amnestic properties, 2) ketamine adds an analgesic component, 3) midazolam counteracts the psychic side-effects of ketamine, and 4) ketamine counteracts the depressive effects of midazolam on vital body functions (respiration and circulation).     

Continuous transcutaneous O2 and CO2 monitoring during conscious sedation for oral surgery

Continuous transcutaneous oxygen and carbon dioxide monitoring during conscious sedation using diazepam, fentanyl, and methohexital indicates that hypoxia occurs in all patients maintained on room air; 36% of the patients maintained on room air showed a decrease in transcutaneous oxygen of greater than 20 mg Hg. Although the use of supplemental O2 prevented hypoxia, the combination of diazepam, fentanyl, and methohexital depressed all of the patient's carbon dioxide chemoreceptors, resulting in a rise in carbon dioxide in the oxygen-supplemented patients as well as in the patients who were maintained on room air. The need for supplemental oxygen in patients sedated with diazepam, fentanyl, and methohexital is clearly established.     

The improvement of safe sedation and dental treatment in patients with metabolic syndrome

The paper concerns the anesthetic aspects of safe conscious sedation and dental treatment of patients with metabolic syndrome. BIS monitoring in combination with routine pulse oximetry and blood pressure measurement is getting dental sedation safer. Independently of the bolus or continuous intravenous midazolam infusion the investigators approved high efficacy of bispectral index in benzodiazepine dose titration. Successful dental treatment under conscious sedation and no evident associated with analgesia complications show the importance of BIS-monitoring in the improvement of safe sedation and dental treatment in patients with metabolic syndrome.     

BIS monitoring during midazolam and midazolam-ketamine conscious intravenous sedation for oral surgery

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the bispectral index scale (BIS) would provide added benefit to established methods of monitoring conscious sedation with midazolam (M group) or midazolam supplemented with ketamine (MK group). STUDY DESIGN: BIS was prospectively and blindly examined in 22 patients receiving outpatient oral surgery with conscious sedation supplemented with local anesthesia. RESULTS: The average midazolam dose in the midazolam group over the treatment period was 0.01 mg/kg/h, and the average midazolam plus ketamine dose was 0.01 and 0.05 mg/kg/h, respectively. Mean BIS values throughout the sedation study period were 90 for the midazolam group and 94 for the midazolam plus ketamine group. The addition of ketamine did not lower BIS. BIS values did not alter significantly over time except for an expected transient drop after the midazolam bolus induction. CONCLUSION: BIS levels remained close to baseline levels, suggesting that BIS would not provided any additional benefit to currently established methods of monitoring patient consciousness during conscious sedation for oral surgery.     

Comparison of three conscious sedation regimens for pediatric dental patients

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical success of three conscious sedation regimens for pediatric dental patients. A clinical trial was performed wherein dental treatment was administered to pediatric patients ASA I and II under conscious sedation.. Fifty-four children were divided into three groups of 18 patients each, randomly assigned Group A received hydroxyzine (2 mg/kg 2 h before treatment and a subsequent dose of 1 mg/kg 20 min before treatment) orally; group B received 0.50 mg/kg midazolam mixed with 1.5 mg/kg hydroxyzine 20 min before treatment orally; group C received chloral hydrate, 50 mg/kg mixed with 1.5 mg/kg hydroxyzine 20 min before treatment orally. The Ohio State Behavioral Rating Scale (OSBRS) showed statistically significant differences between groups B and C with respect to group A. The regimens of midazolam or chloral hydrate mixed with hydroxyzine represent excellent choices for conscious sedation regimens for pediatric dental patients.     

Evaluation of sedation failure in the outpatient oral and maxillofacial surgery clinic.

PURPOSE: Our goal was to report on the incidence of sedation failures in our outpatient oral surgery clinic. Sedation failure is the inability to complete a procedure under intravenous sedation. There is very little in the oral surgery literature on this subject. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Proper Institutional Review Board approval was obtained from the appropriate governing body for this project. The medical records of 539 intravenous sedation patients treated at the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinic at our institution were retrospectively evaluated to determine the incidence of failed sedation. Patients sedated with midazolam and fentanyl were placed in group A. There were 323 patients in group A. We placed patients sedated with midazolam, fentanyl and methohexital into group B. There were 216 patients in group B. The gender, medical history, type of procedure being performed, amount of drug given, and the patient's vital signs throughout the procedure were recorded. RESULTS: There were 9 failed sedations with a rate of 1.6% (9/539); 3 in group B (1%) and 6 in group A (2%). Five of our failures were undergoing multiple tooth extractions. Two of the failures were undergoing surgical removal of impacted third molars. Two patients underwent mandibular fracture reduction. Failure was attributed to increased agitation and combativeness, uncontrolled hypertension, tachycardia and desaturation. CONCLUSION: The mandible fracture population and multiple teeth extraction patients had higher rates of failure than other groups. This may be the result of procedure length, type of procedure, or a preoperative anxiety and attitude toward treatment expressed by the patient making sedation unpredictable. Level of training and experience of the practitioner may contribute to sedation failure. These results allow us to develop a prospective study protocol of outpatient sedation and to quantify more detailed information about preoperative anxiety, medical status, and social history than we had available during our chart review. More specific conclusions may help us determine if certain patient populations are at a higher risk for failed sedations.     

笑气镇静系统与咪达唑仑口服镇静在智障儿童患者牙科治疗中的应用

目的:探讨笑气镇静系统与咪达唑仑口服镇静在智障儿童患者牙科治疗中的临床效果。方法:选取67例对口腔诊疗不配合的智障儿童患者,在门诊环境下实施笑气镇静（笑气浓度为35%~50%）和咪达唑仑口服镇静辅助诊疗（给药剂量为0.50~0.75 mg/kg）,记录各项评价指标,并对治疗效果和安全性进行比较。应用SPSSl3.0软件对2组的治疗成功率、不良反应发生率等行χ²检验。结果:2组治疗总成功率为70% ( 47/67) , 笑气镇静组的成功率为67%（26/39）,咪达唑仑口服镇静组的成功率为75%（21/28）。总不良反应发生率为13%(9/67) ,笑气镇静组不良反应发生率为5%(2/39),显著低于咪达唑仑口服镇静组(7/28,25%,P<0.05)。结论:笑气镇静系统与咪达唑仑口服镇静在智障儿童患者牙科治疗中均有较好的临床效果。笑气镇静系统的成功率稍低于咪达唑仑口服镇静者,但其不良反应明显少于后者。     

Factors associated with administration route when using midazolam for pediatric conscious sedation

Midazolam conscious sedation records of pediatric dental patients, one to six years of age, were reviewed retrospectively to: 1) examine the factors associated with the use of oral and nasal routes of administration and their effect on displayed behavior during dental treatment and 2) determine whether a child's compliance with oral administration is predictive of the intraoperative behavior displayed during dental treatment. Two hundred and fifty-seven conscious sedation records for 222 pediatric dental patients sedated with orally or nasally administered midazolam for dental treatment at the University of Florida were reviewed. Data collected included the patient's age, gender, route of administration, dose, compliance with oral administration, appointment type (planned vs. emergency), previous sedation experience with midazolam, operator vs. parent administration of the medication, use of papoose board and nitrous oxide/oxygen inhalation, types of procedures performed (restorations only, extractions only, or both), length of treatment rendered, and preoperative and intraoperative behavioral assessments of the child. The collected data were analyzed with Statview software using ANOVA and Chi-square analyses. There was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) between oral and nasal administration for the parameters of age, procedure length, appointment type, procedures performed, previous sedation experience and use of the papoose board and nitrous oxide/oxygen inhalation. While there was no statistically significant influence of chronological age on the preoperative Frankl behavior ratings, there was a statistically significant mean age difference with respect to the administrator of the medication (parent vs. operator), papoose board use, N2O/O2 use and previous sedation experience. Forty-five percent of the subjects were willing to accept oral administration of the medication, however, there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.114) between the child's compliance to accept the medication and the intraoperative Frankl behavioral ratings displayed during dental treatment. In this review of midazolam conscious sedation records of pediatric dental patients. 1) route of administration was significantly influenced by several patient and procedural variables, resulting in different behavioral outcomes and 2) compliance with oral administration was not predictive of behavior displayed during treatment.     

Midazolam conscious sedation in a large Danish municipal dental service for children and adolescents

Objective.  The aim of this study was to describe the introduction and the first six years use of midazolam for conscious sedation in a municipal dental service in Denmark.
Methods.  In 1998, all dentists were introduced to midazolam conscious sedation. A sedation chart was filled in for each session, and parents' assessment was obtained. In 2004, all clinical materials were collected.
Results.  Six hundred and eighty sessions were performed; 63.7% of the children were between 2 and 6 years of age; 88.5% belonged to American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 1; 74.8% of the sedations performed used the oral route of administration. Restorations were performed during 60.3% of the sessions, and extractions during 38.4%. Complications during the sessions were rare, the most frequent being double vision (6.1%), hiccups (2.7%), and paradoxical reaction (2.0%). Using Wilton's sedation scale, 42.9% were calm and 27.7% were agitated during treatment, whereas after treatment 61.7% were calm; 80.4% of the parents were very positive towards this sedation method.
Conclusion.  Sedation with midazolam for dental treatment of children with dental fear and anxiety is a feasible and an efficient method with a low rate of complications. It can probably reduce the need for dental treatment under general anaesthesia.     

咪达唑仑复合氯诺西康在阻生齿拔除术中的应用

目的:观察小剂量咪达唑仑复合氯诺西康在阻生齿拔除术中的临床应用效果。方法 :40例需拔除下颌第三磨牙的患者随机分为研究组和对照组,研究组采用小剂量咪达唑仑复合氯诺西康静脉注射加局部麻醉法拔牙,对照组采用常规局部麻醉法拔牙。记录2组患者的收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、心率(HR)和脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO2),并进行镇静程度(Ramsay评分)、改良牙科焦虑量表评分、疼痛程度(VAS评分)的观察。结果:研究组SBP、DBP、HR、SpO2较对照组均有轻度降低;研究组镇静程度增强(Ramsay镇静评分增高);研究组的术后改良牙科焦虑量表评分低于对照组;研究组术前局麻时及术后VAS评分均低于对照组。结论:小剂量咪达唑仑复合氯诺西康在阻生齿拔除术中,对于极度牙科恐惧的患者具有较好的疗效。     

口服与肌注咪达唑仑镇静治疗儿童牙科焦虑症的临床疗效对比

目的:评估咪达唑仑口服或肌注两种不同给药方法对牙科焦虑症患儿牙科治疗时的镇静效果。方法:将2020年1月~2020年7月于深圳市儿童医院口腔科接受咪达唑仑镇静下牙齿治疗的90例患儿随机分为两组,每组45例。肌注组给予肌注咪达唑仑(0.2 mg/kg),口服组给予口服咪达唑仑(0.6 mg/kg,单次最大剂量20.0 mg)。采用Ramssay量表评估患儿镇静情况,Frankl量表评估患儿治疗依从性,Houpt量表评估患儿治疗完成情况。同时记录药物起效时间、患儿治疗过程中的心率、血氧饱和度、术中及术后不良反应情况等。结果:肌注组起效时间(13.0±2.0)min明显短于口服组(15.6±1.8)min,差异有统计学意义(t=6.489,P<0.05)。两组的Ramssay量表评分中位分值(Z=-1.089,P=0.276),Frankl量表评分中位分值(Z=-0.0863,P=0.388)及Houpt量表评分中位分值(Z=-1.854,P=0.064)差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),评分分布相似。两组患儿的镇静成功率(χ^2=0.178,P>0.05)及治疗成功率(χ^2=3.103,P>0.05)差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(χ^2=0.080,P>0.05)。结论:口服或肌注咪达唑仑镇静效果相似,是治疗牙科焦虑症患儿的安全有效的镇静方法,但肌注组的镇静起效更快。     

Assessment of intranasal midazolam administration with a dose of 0.5 mg/kg in behavior management of uncooperative children

AIM: Intranasal midazolam has been used to induce conscious sedation in children with negative and aggressive behavior The main goal of this study was to determine the effectiveness of intranasal administration of midazolam (with a dose of 0.5 mg/kg) in behavior management of uncooperative children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty healthy, difficult children of 3-5 years were evaluated. At the beginning of each session, ordinary techniques of behavior management to treat patients were applied. In cases of unsatisfactory responses, intranasal midazolam was immediately employed. To determine the efficacy of the drug, child behavior was evaluated before and after administration of midazolam using Houpt rating scale of general behavior. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was demonstrated in the patients 'behavior before and after administration of intranasal midazolam. CONCLUSIONS: this drug is effective in sedation and reduction of the anxiety of children under treatment.     

Conscious sedation by oral administration of midazolam in paediatric dental treatment

Midazolam is a short-acting benzodiazepine with rapid onset, short duration of action and minimal side effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the oral administration of midazolam as pre-operative sedation in the dental treatment of uncooperative pediatric patients. Included in the study were 160 children with a mean age of 6.7 +/- 2.6 years (1-14 years), 83 boys and 77 girls. All the patients had been referred for specialist treatment due to behavioral management problems. Treatment was performed in 250 sessions. All the children received an oral dose of 0.2 mg/kg body weight of midazolam. Acceptance of treatment was evaluated according to Rud & Kisling. Local anesthesia followed by restorative treatment and/or extractions constituted more than 90% of the performed treatments. Of the 250 sessions, 63% were performed with total acceptance and 30% with doubtful acceptance. In 7%, no treatment could be performed. No serious complications were registered during or after treatment. All the children were able to leave the clinic one hour after treatment. In conclusion, we consider oral administration of midazolam a safe form of premedication. The route of administration, the short waiting-time and half-life, in combination with a level of sedation that allows treatment to be performed, are the principal advantages of conscious sedation with orally administered midazolam.     

Comparison of oral midazolam with oral tramadol, triclofos and zolpidem in the sedation of pediatric dental patients: An in vivo study

Objective: oral sedation is the simplest and most convenient sedation method for managing uncooperative child patients because it is easy to administer and there is no need for nasal hood or injection. Oral midazolam is the most commonly used preanesthetic medication for children. When given in amounts between 0.5 and 0.75 mg/kg of body weight, oral midazolam has been found to be an effective sedative agent for pediatric outpatients. Tramadol is a synthetic, centrally acting analgesic indicated for moderate to severe pain. Chloral hydrate is one of the sedatives most commonly used, has excellent absorption, fast induction, and exert minimal effects on respiration. zolpidem is the most commonly prescribed hypnotic due to its clinical efficacy, safety, and ability to be well tolerated with patients. Materials and Methods: 60 anxious and fearful children who reported to the department were treated under conscious sedation for the accomplishment of dental treatment. Patients were randomly assigned to four groups. Statistical analysis was done using Kruskal Wallis Test and decision criterion was to reject the null hypothesis if the P-value is less than 0.05. Results: it was observed that there is a statistically significant difference in median scores recorded for the level of sedation between the different groups (P < 0.001). Conclusion: this study concluded that midazolam is the best drug for producing conscious sedation followed by tramadol and triclofos. Zolpidem was not able to produce a sufficient level of sedation and it cannot be supported as a sedative agent at the present dosage.     

The effects of oral conscious sedation on future behavior and anxiety in pediatric dental patients

PURPOSE: This study investigated the relationship between oral conscious sedation and subsequent behavior in the dental setting. METHODS: The sample consisted of 38 children between the ages of 39 to 71 months (mean=50 months) who had been treated with oral sedation 2 to 34 months(mean=13 months) previously, and a control group of 38 children, matched by age (mean=51 months) and gender, who had received dental treatment without conscious sedation or general anesthesia one week to 3 years previously. Subjects were matched by age and gender. All children received a standard recall examination and a prophylaxis, during which behavior and anxiety were measured. Independent variables included age at the time of sedation, present age, gender, time elapsed since sedation, effectiveness of sedation, parental scores on Corah's Dental Anxiety Scale and parent's answers to a questionnaire. The dependent variables were child behavior (rated with the 4-point Frankl scale) and self-reported anxiety ratings. RESULTS: Both groups had mean behavior ratings of positive or very positive (experimental group mean=3.13; control group mean=3.34). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups and there was little correlation of independent and dependent variables. CONCLUSIONS: There is no relationship between oral conscious sedation and the future behavior of children in the dental setting.     

The effects of midazolam on pediatric patients with asthma

PURPOSE: This study was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of midazolam in asthmatic patients undergoing dental treatment. METHODS: Twenty-four children, aged 19 to 65 months, with a diagnosis of mild to moderate asthma were given an oral dose of 0.5 mg/kg of midazolam. Oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, and pulse rate were monitored before, during, immediately after, and 30 minutes following dental treatment. The child's asthma score was also determined before and after treatment. The dental operator assessed the overall sedation outcome immediately after treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-three of the 24 subjects had asthma scores of "0" before and after treatment. During dental treatment, 2 patients had oxygen saturations of 94% at one point during treatment. However, oxygen saturation increased when the patient's head and neck were repositioned. Twenty-three of the 24 subjects had oxygen saturations above 95% at 30 minutes following treatment. Pulse rates and respiratory rates exhibited transitory increases, linked to when the child was stimulated. Statistical analysis was conducted from within subjects repeated measures via ANOVA and with a general linear model approach. No statistically significant differences occurred in oxygen saturation and respiratory rate. However, significant differences did occur in pulse rate between 5 and 10 minutes (mean difference=10+/-3.84) and between 10 and 15 minutes (mean difference=19+/-5.50), as expected. No statistically significant differences occurred in asthma score before and after treatment. Twelve subjects were assessed to have excellent behavior, 5 subjects were satisfactory, and 7 subjects were unsatisfactory. No treatment was aborted. CONCLUSIONS: With adherence to the AAPD's sedation guidelines, midazolam at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg is a safe and effective mean for sedation of patients with mild to moderate asthma.     

A study of the effectiveness of oral midazolam sedation for orthodontic extraction of permanent teeth in children: a prospective,randomised, controlled,crossover trial

OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety, effectiveness and acceptability of o:ral midazolam sedation for orthodontic extraction of permanent teeth in children. DESIGN: A prospective, randomised, controlled, crossover trial. METHODS: A total of 26 children aged 10-16 (ASA I), referred for orthodontic extraction of premolar or canine teeth under sedation, were included in the study. Each child required two treatment sessions for the extraction of equivalent teeth on opposite sides of the mouth. Each subject was sedated with either ora midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) or nitrous oxide and oxygen (30%/70%) at the first visit and the alternative form at the second visit. At each visit two teeth were extracted, one upper and one lower. Heart rate, arterial oxygen saturation, respiration rate, sedation and behavioural scores were recorded every five minutes. Overall behaviour, patient acceptance and patient satisfaction were recorded at the end of treatment. RESULTS: Of the 26 children included in the study there were 12 males and 14 females. The mean age was 12.5 years. The mean heart rate and respiratory rate for both groups were similar and within acceptable clinical limits. The lowest mean arterial oxygen saturation levels for nitrous oxide and midazolam sedation were 97.7% and 95.0% respectively. Although midazolam caused greater oxygen desaturation, the range (91%-100%) was within safe limits for conscious sedation. The mean level of sedation was greater in the midazolam group compared with the nitrous oxide group and all but one case completed treatment. A total of 23 patients (88%) said they would be prepared to have ora midazolam sedation again and 17 (65%) actually preferred oral midazolam to nitrous oxide sedation. CONCLUSION: Oral midazolam (0.5mg/kg) appears to be a safe and acceptable form of sedation for 10-16 year old paediatric dental patients.     

Comparison of dexmedetomidine/fentanyl with midazolam/fentanyl combination for sedation and analgesia during tooth extraction

Dexmedetomidine is an α2-adrenergic receptor agonist that causes minimal respiratory depression compared with alternative drugs. This study investigated whether combined dexmedetomidine/fentanyl offered better sedation and analgesia than midazolam/fentanyl in dental surgery. Sixty patients scheduled for unilateral impacted tooth extraction were randomly assigned to receive either dexmedetomidine and fentanyl (D/F) or midazolam and fentanyl (M/F). Recorded variables were patient preoperative anxiety scores, vital signs, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (OAAS) scores after drug administration, surgeon and patient degree of satisfaction, and the duration of analgesia after surgery. The OAAS scores were significantly lower for patients administered D/F compared to those who received M/F. The duration of analgesia after the surgical procedure was significantly longer in patients who received D/F (5.3 h) than in those who received M/F (4.1 h; P = 0.017). The number of surgeons satisfied with the level of sedation/analgesia provided by D/F was significantly higher than for M/F (P = 0.001). Therefore, dexmedetomidine/fentanyl appears to provide better sedation, stable haemodynamics, surgeon satisfaction, and postoperative analgesia than midazolam/fentanyl during office-based unilateral impacted tooth extraction.