In vitro measurement of pressure in intervertebral discs and annulus fibrosus with and without annular tears during discography

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Discogram studies have shown that pain reproduction correlates with the extent of annular disruption. However, it has not been assessed if pressure changes in the annulus fibrosus vary incrementally with intradiscal pressure. PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between intradiscal pressure and outer annular pressure during discography in intervertebral discs with and without annular tears. STUDY DESIGN: Intradiscal and periannular pressures were measured simultaneously in vitro during intradiscal injection in porcine cadaver spines. METHODS: Twenty fresh porcine cadaver lumbar spines with intervening discs were tested. Intradiscal and periannular pressures were measured simultaneously using two pressure sensors during intradiscal contrast injection. The tip of a 25-gauge needle connected with a pressure manometer was placed in the center of the nucleus pulposus. A second pressure transducer was located at the outer third of the annulus fibrosus. Needle and transducer locations were confirmed by fluoroscopy. To compare the intact and torn annulus fibrosus, annular disruptions were created with a 20-gauge needle and confirmed by fluoroscopy. RESULTS: During intradiscal injections of discs with an intact annulus, annulus fibrosus pressure remained low and a sharp increase in intradiscal pressure was observed. Significantly higher pressures were noted in the outer annulus in discs with annular tears (p<.01). Mean pressures at the central nucleus pulposus, the outer third of intact annuli and torn annuli were 93.4+/-40.9 psi, 14.8+/-1.9 psi and 85.7+/-24.8 psi, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Volumetric injection of intervertebral discs with a torn annulus fibrosis during discography may increase intra-annular pressure similar to the increase in pressure that may occur during spinal loading activities. This effect may not occur in discs with an intact annulus fibrosus.     

Consistency of lumbar discograms of the same disc obtained twice at a 2-week interval: Influence of needle tip position

Although numerous papers have emphasized the importance of accurate needle positioning in lumbar discography, no concrete evidence is available to support this contention, and no study has evaluated the image consistency of discography as influenced by this factor. By observing the consistency of two images in relation to needle tip position we aimed to clarify the importance of needle positioning in discography. One hundred and ninety-two patients (324 discs) receiving steroid intradiscal therapy in whom discography of the same disc was performed twice at a 2-week interval and in whom the needle tip position was within the acceptable range (as defined by us) were studied. The patients were divided into two groups: in group G, in whom the needle tip was within a limited range on both discograms, and group P, in whom the needle tip was in this range on only one discogram. Image consistency was compared roentgenographically in the two groups. The consistent image rate for the total number of discs was 48.5%, being significantly higher in group G (53.2%) than in group P (39.0%). The rates were lower in the nucleus pulposus and the posterior portion of the disc than in the other disc areas, but were significantly higher in group G (85.4% and 75.0%, respectively, for these two areas). The necessity for accurate needle tip positioning was proved roentgenographically. Received for publication on July 3, 1997; accepted on March 31, 1998     

Disc deterioration in low-back syndromes. A prospective, multi-center CT/discography study

Disc deterioration and pain provocation in different low-back pain syndromes was studied using computed tomography (CT) discography. Data were prospectively collected for 300 patients (816 discs). Patients were classified by their pre-discography diagnosis of disc herniation (DH), degenerated disc (DD), lumbar syndrome (LS), lumbar radicular syndrome (LRS), or other. The CT/discograms were classified by discographic pain response, the amount of degeneration and annular disruption. Eighty-two percent of DH patients, 80% of DD, 56% of LS, and 59% of LRS patients had both positive discographic pain provocation and moderate or severe disc deterioration. The study indicates that intradiscal pathology plays a major role in nonspecific low-back pain syndromes.     

腰部椎间盘造影及椎间盘内加压注射疗法

目的:探讨椎间盘内加压注射疗法对脱出型腰椎间盘突出症的治疗效果.方法:突出的椎间盘内加压注射3～20ml生理盐水,要避免用力过大,加压注射的压力低于3kg/cm^2.结果:脱出的椎间盘组织进入硬膜外腔后接触血液系统,逐渐被血液系统中的T细胞及单核细胞清除吸收.加压注射疗法能够促进这一吸收过程.结论:L1～5椎间盘和L5～S1椎间盘的穿刺体位和穿刺方向虽然有一定的差异,但是椎间盘内加压注射疗法是一种有效的治疗腰椎椎间盘突出症的微创疗法.     

Real‐time continuous monitoring of injection pressure at the needle tip for peripheral nerve blocks: description of a new method

The measurement of injection pressure during the performance of peripheral nerve blocks can be pivotal to detect intraneural placement of the needle tip and thus avoid intrafascicular injection. However, injection pressure can only be measured along the injection line (tubing), which is influenced by several factors. The primary aim of this feasibility study was to describe and validate the principle of a novel nerve‐block needle conceived for real‐time continuous monitoring of injection pressures at the needle tip. Our secondary aim was to provide measurements and compare injection pressure values at the needle tip and in the injection line. Four porcine lower limb anatomic models were prepared and extraneural injections were performed with fractioned boluses of 2 ml saline at a controlled infusion rate of 10 ml.min^?1 (0.16 ml.s^?1). Injection pressure at the needle tip was monitored and compared with the pressure in the injection line. The system proved to be reliable. Thirty injections were successfully performed without technical failures. The mean (95%CI) difference between pressures at the needle tip and the injection line varied substantially from 14.33 (12.58–16.08) kPa at 0.5 ml injected volume to 41.56 (39.66–43.45) kPa at the end of the injection. This study demonstrates that the described system allows for real‐time continuous monitoring of injection pressure at the needle tip. Moreover, this study shows that injection pressure values measured in the injection line cannot be assumed to be a reliable indicator of the injection pressure at the needle tip.     

Discitis after discography

Infection after intradiscal injections has been recognised as a distinct entity, but discitis after discography has often been attributed to an aseptic process or a chemical reaction to the contrast material. We examined the hypothesis that discitis after discography is always due to infection, and report a clinical review and an experimental study. Part I. We reviewed the case records and radiographs of 432 patients who had undergone lumbar discography. When an 18-gauge needle without a stilette had been used, discitis was diagnosed in 2.7% of 222 patients but stiletted needles and a two-needle technique at each level reduced the incidence to 0.7%. Seven patients with discitis after discography had undergone anterior discectomy and fusion; in them the histopathological findings were of a chronic inflammatory response. Bacteria were isolated from the discs of three of the four patients who had open biopsy less than six weeks from the time of discography. These findings suggest that bacteria were initiators rather than promoters of the response. Part II. Multiple level lumbar discography was carried out in mature sheep, injecting contrast material with or without various concentrations of bacteria. Radiographs were taken and the discs and end-plates were examined histologically and cultured for bacteria at intervals after injection. None of the controls showed any evidence of discitis but all sheep injected with bacteria had typical radiological and histopathological changes by six weeks, though cultures were almost all negative. However, at one and two weeks after injection, but usually not after three weeks, bacteria could be isolated. We suggest that all cases of discitis after discography are initiated by infection, and that a very strict aseptic technique should be used for all injections into intervertebral discs.     

The effect of spinal steroid injections for degenerative disc disease.

BACKGROUND: No conclusive evidence exists to determine that spinal steroid injections give lasting improvement in patients with predominantly axial low back pain resulting from lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD). PURPOSE: The objectives of the study were to determine the effect of epidural steroid injections (ESIs) and intradiscal steroid injections (ISIs) in patients who exhibit DDD symptoms for more than 1 year and to determine whether patients with inflammatory end-plate changes are a unique subgroup of DDD patients in terms of treatment response. STUDY DESIGN: Pain and function in patients with DDD were prospectively assessed by an outcomes questionnaire before and after various spinal injections. Further correlation was made with end-plate inflammatory (Modic Type 1) changes identified on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). PATIENT SAMPLE: ESI was performed in 232 patients who were referred for treatment of DDD, and discography with or without intradiscal steroid was performed in 171 patients who were possible spinal arthrodesis candidates. OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain and function were determined by a self-administered outcomes questionnaire that consisted of a visual analog pain scale, pain drawing, Oswestry Disability Index, use of pain medication and opinion of treatment success. METHODS: ESI was performed in 93 patients with DDD and inflammatory end-plate changes and in 139 patients without inflammatory end-plate changes. Patients with inflammatory end-plate changes (n=78) or without inflammatory end-plate changes (n=93), all of whom were considered fusion candidates, underwent discography with or without intradiscal steroid in a randomized fashion. Pain and function were prospectively determined by a self-administered outcomes survey (VAS pain, Oswestry Disability index [ODI], pain diagram [PD] and opinion of success) before and after the patients' injection for a 2-year follow-up period. MRI and discography results were correlated with patient outcomes scores. RESULTS: ESI was effective in improving pain and function, as assessed by outcomes scores at short-term follow-up. However, at 2 years, less than one-third had not had additional invasive treatment. Patients with inflammatory end-plate changes had greater improvement in ODI and PD scores in the first 6 months than did those patients without the end-plate changes. Intradiscal steroid injections into discs with concordant pain at the time of discography led to significant improvement in patients with inflammatory end-plate changes in all outcomes scales, but only minimal temporary improvement in patients without the end-plate changes. Disc pressure manometry at the time of discography found that discs with adjacent inflammatory end-plate changes reproduced symptoms at pressures significantly lower than those in other types of discs. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal steroid injections, both ESI and ISI, are beneficial for a small number of patients with advanced DDD and chronic low back pain. For those patients in whom a beneficial effect is found, spinal steroid injection is a low-risk and rapid treatment option. Spinal steroid injections are more effective in patients with MRI findings of discogenic inflammation, specifically adjacent inflammatory end-plate changes.     

Compressed air injection technique to standardize block injection pressures

PURPOSE: Presently, no standardized technique exists to monitor injection pressures during peripheral nerve blocks. Our objective was to determine if a compressed air injection technique, using an in vitro model based on Boyle's law and typical regional anesthesia equipment, could consistently maintain injection pressures below a 1293 mmHg level associated with clinically significant nerve injury. METHODS: Injection pressures for 20 and 30 mL syringes with various needle sizes (18G, 20G, 21G, 22G, and 24G) were measured in a closed system. A set volume of air was aspirated into a saline-filled syringe and then compressed and maintained at various percentages while pressure was measured. The needle was inserted into the injection port of a pressure sensor, which had attached extension tubing with an injection plug clamped "off". Using linear regression with all data points, the pressure value and 99% confidence interval (CI) at 50% air compression was estimated. RESULTS: The linearity of Boyle's law was demonstrated with a high correlation, r = 0.99, and a slope of 0.984 (99% CI: 0.967-1.001). The net pressure generated at 50% compression was estimated as 744.8 mmHg, with the 99% CI between 729.6 and 760.0 mmHg. The various syringe/needle combinations had similar results. CONCLUSION: By creating and maintaining syringe air compression at 50% or less, injection pressures will be substantially below the 1293 mmHg threshold considered to be an associated risk factor for clinically significant nerve injury. This technique may allow simple, real-time and objective monitoring during local anesthetic injections while inherently reducing injection speed.     

The ability of a real‐time injection pressure monitoring system to discriminate between perineural and intraneural injection of the sciatic nerve in fresh cadavers

Injection pressure monitoring provides valuable information to prevent intraneural injections and possibly consequent nerve damage during peripheral nerve block. However, the measurement of injection pressure along the injection line is inaccurate as it is influenced by several variables. The aim of this study was to test a new system for precise injection pressure monitoring at the needle tip in a cadaveric model. The system consists of a miniaturised pressure sensor embedded within the needle shaft that is connected via an optical fibre to an external control unit. In order to test the capacity of the system to discriminate between perineural and intraneural injections, a total of 24 ultrasound‐guided injections at various locations of the sciatic nerve (12 perineural and 12 intraneural) were performed in fresh cadavers. The injections were delivered at a constant rate by an electronic pump (5 ml saline at 10 ml.min^?1). Two perineural and two intraneural injections were excluded from analysis, since the operator could not confirm the exact needle‐tip location. Mean (SD) peak injection pressure was significantly lower for perineural compared with intraneural injections (14 (6) kPa vs. 131 (56) kPa; p < 0.001). This study shows that this system is a reliable method to accurately monitor injection pressure at the needle tip, allowing for discrimination between perineural and intraneural injections of the sciatic nerve in fresh cadavers.     

Provocative discography in volunteer subjects with mild persistent low back pain.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Whether discographic injections would be positive in subjects with benign persistent "backache" who are not seeking treatment is unknown. This information is important, because benign backache undoubtedly co-exists in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) illness that is not discogenicin origin. If these subjects had a high rate of positive discography, the high background incidence of common backache would allow many positive tests in patients in whom discogenic processes were unrelated to their severe CLBP illness. Conversely, if subjects with benign low back pain rarely if ever had significant concordant pain reproduction on disc injections, the basic tenet of discographic diagnosis would be strengthened. PURPOSE: To compare, using a strict experimental design, the relative pain and concordancy response to provocative discography in subjects with clinically insignificant "backache" and clinical subjects with CLBP illness considering surgical treatment. STUDY DESIGN: Comparison of experimental disc injections in subjects with persistent mild backache and those with chronic low back pain (CLBP) illness. PATIENT SAMPLE: Twenty-five subjects with mild persistent low back pain (LBP) were recruited for an experimental discography study. Subjects were recruited from a clinical study of patients having had cervical spine surgery. Inclusion criteria required that subjects not be receiving or seeking medical treatment for LBP, be taking no medications for backache, have no activity restrictions because of LBP, and have normal psychometric scores. To more closely approximate the pain behavior in CLBP illness, 50% (12) of the "backache" group were recruited with a chronic painful condition (neck/shoulder) unrelated to the low back. CLBP subjects, patients coming to discography for consideration of surgical treatment, were used as control subjects. OUTCOME MEASURES: Results of discography were determined using the criteria of Walsh et al.: pain response of 3 or greater, two or more pain behaviors, a negative "control" discographic injection, and a similar or exact concordancy rating. METHODS: Discography was performed on experimental subjects and control patients. Experienced raters, who were blinded to control versus experimental status of the subjects, scored the magnetic resonance image, discogram, psychometric tests and discography videotapes of the subjects' pain behavior. RESULTS: Thirteen of 25 volunteer subjects had pain rated as "bad" or worse with disc injection. There were 12 painful and fully concordant disc injections in 9 of these 25 "backache" subjects (36%). These injections met all the Walsh et al. criteria for a positive diagnosis of discogenic pain. All positive discs had annular disruption to or through the outer annulus. Of the 9 subjects with positive discograms, 3 had no chronic pain states and 6 did. All subjects with positive injections had negative control discs. In comparison, in 52 subjects with CLBP illness 38 (73%) had at least one positive disc injection. CONCLUSIONS: In a group of volunteer subjects with persistent "backache," 36% were found to have significant pain on disc injection, which is reported to be concordant with their usual pain. The presence of positive concordant pain responses and negative control discs in 33% of subjects without CLBP illness seriously challenges the specificity of provocative discography in identifying a clinically relevant spinal pathology.     

Magnetic resonance imaging and discography in the diagnosis of disc degeneration. A comparative study of 50 discs

The lumbar spines of 22 patients were examined for disc degeneration by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and by discography. The results from 50 intervertebral discs visualised by both techniques were independently assessed and graded on a five-point scale from normality to gross degeneration and then compared. In 44 discs the results agreed. Of the six discs which gave differing results, four discrepancies were due to observer error and two to incorrect placement of the discographic needle. MRI was shown to be more accurate than discography in the diagnosis of disc degeneration. It has several major advantages, which should make it the investigation of choice.     

Discitis after discography. The role of prophylactic antibiotics

Discitis after discography is due to bacterial penetration into the intervertebral disc by a contaminated needle and has an incidence of 1% to 4%. We have examined the prophylactic role of cephazolin administered at the time of discography. An experimental study in sheep using radiographic contrast containing Staphylococcus epidermidis showed that either adding the antibiotic to the intradiscal suspension or giving it intravenously 30 minutes before intradiscal inoculation of bacteria prevented any radiographic, macroscopic or histological signs of discitis; all the intervertebral disc cultures were negative. In a prospective clinical study of 127 consecutive patients having lumbar discography, the injected contrast contained cephazolin 1 mg per ml. None of the patients developed clinical or radiographic signs of discitis. We recommend the use of a suitable broad spectrum antibiotic in a single prophylactic dose whenever the intervertebral disc is entered.     

Combination of intraneural injection and high injection pressure leads to fascicular injury and neurologic deficits in dogs

BACKGROUND: Unintentional intraneural injection of local anesthetics may cause mechanical injury and pressure ischemia of the nerve fascicles. One study in small animals showed that intraneural injection may be associated with higher injection pressures. However, the pressure heralding an intraneural injection and the clinical consequences of such injections remain controversial. Our hypothesis is that an intraneural injection is associated with higher pressures and an increase in the risk of neurologic injury as compared with perineural injection. METHODS: Seven dogs of mixed breed (15-18 kg) were studied. After general endotracheal anesthesia, the sciatic nerves were exposed bilaterally. Under direct microscopic guidance, a 25-gauge needle was placed either perineurally (into the epineurium) or intraneurally (within the perineurium), and 4 mL of lidocaine 2% (1:250,000 epinephrine) was injected by using an automated infusion pump (4 mL/min). Injection pressure data were acquired by using an in-line manometer coupled to a computer via an analog digital conversion board. After injection, the animals were awakened and subjected to serial neurologic examinations. On the 7th day, the dogs were killed, the sciatic nerves were excised, and histologic examination was performed by pathologists blinded to the purpose of the study. RESULTS: Whereas all perineural injections resulted in pressures < or =4 psi, the majority of intraneural injections were associated with high pressures (25-45 psi) at the beginning of the injection. Normal motor function returned 3 hours after all injections associated with low injection pressures (< or =11 psi), whereas persistent motor deficits were observed in all 4 animals having high injection pressures (> or =25 psi). Histologic examination showed destruction of neural architecture and degeneration of axons in all 4 sciatic nerves receiving high-pressure injections. CONCLUSIONS: High injection pressures at the onset of injection may indicate an intraneural needle placement and lead to severe fascicular injury and persistent neurologic deficits. If these results are applicable to clinical practice, avoiding excessive injection pressure during nerve block administration may help to reduce the risk of neurologic injury.     

Intradiscal pressure-volume response: a methodological contribution to chemonucleolysis. Preliminary results

A new method is presented to verify whether a lumbar disc is degenerated prior to chemonucleolysis. This consists in rapid injection of a 0.3-ml bolus of saline into the center of the disc (through the needle employed for chemonucleolysis), under continuous recording of the intradiscal pressure changes caused by this volume load. If the intradiscal pressure falls below 600 mm Hg within 2 minutes after the injection, there is a high probability (p less than 0.001) that the disc is degenerated. This method has many advantages: it obviates additional injection of contrast medium prior to chemonucleolysis, it prevents inhibition of chymopapain by the contrast medium, it saves time, and it reduces the total amount of fluid injected during chemonucleolysis.     

Intradiscal pressure after repeat intradiscal injection of hypertonic saline: an experimental study

Chemonucleolysis with chymopapain is an effective alternative to an operation for the treatment of some patients who have a lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. However, chymopapain is associated with rare but serious complications. Accordingly, alternative substances for chemonucleolysis have been sought. The main beneficial effect of chemonucleolysis derives from the decrease in the intradiscal pressure. We have previously reported that hypertonic saline injected into the intervertebral discs decreased the intradiscal pressure, but only temporarily. The present experimental study investigated changes in the intradiscal pressure after a repeat intradiscal injection of hypertonic saline. The lumbar intervertebral discs of 18 living rabbits were examined: 10% hypertonic saline was injected intradiscally just once in 12 rabbits, and the same dosage was injected again, 4 weeks later, in the same animals. The intradiscal pressure was measured at 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after the second injection. The remaining six rabbits were used as controls, without puncture and without injection. The intradiscal pressure of the group with repeat hypertonic saline injection at 4 weeks was significantly lower than that of the control group. The decreased pressure showed a tendency to increase at 8 weeks, and it had recovered at 12 weeks. The results of this study suggest that repeat hypertonic saline injections may be clinically useful.     

Reduced injection pressures using a compressed air injection technique (CAIT): an in vitro study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: High injection pressures have been associated with intraneural injection and persistent neurological injury in animals. Our objective was to test whether a reported simple compressed air injection technique (CAIT) would limit the generation of injection pressures to below a suggested 1,034 mm Hg limit in an in vitro model. METHODS: After ethics board approval, 30 consenting anesthesiologists injected saline into a semiclosed system. Injection pressures using 30 mL syringes connected to a 22 gauge needle and containing 20 mL of saline were measured for 60 seconds using: (1) a typical "syringe feel" method, and (2) CAIT, thereby drawing 10 mL of air above the saline and compressing this to 5 mL prior to and during injections. All anesthesiologists performed the syringe feel method before introduction and demonstration of CAIT. RESULTS: Using CAIT, no anesthesiologist generated pressures above 1,034 mm Hg, while 29 of 30 produced pressures above this limit at some time using the syringe feel method. The mean pressure using CAIT was lower (636 +/- 71 vs. 1378 +/- 194 mm Hg, P = .025), and the syringe feel method resulted in higher peak pressures (1,875 +/- 206 vs. 715 +/- 104 mm Hg, P = .000). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that CAIT can effectively keep injection pressures under 1,034 mm Hg in this in vitro model. Animal and clinical studies will be needed to determine whether CAIT will allow objective, real-time pressure monitoring. If high pressure injections are proven to contribute to nerve injury in humans, this technique may have the potential to improve the safety of peripheral nerve blocks.     

The effect of discography on the canine intervertebral disc

With increasing use of chemonucleolysis, interest and use of discography is at an all-time high. Various reports in past years have disagreed on the safety and efficacy of intradiscal injections of contrast mediums. This experimental study was devised to determine the effects of discography on the gross and histologic appearance of the lumbar intervertebral disc. Through a laparotomy approach, five lumbar discs in ten dogs were exposed. In each dog, one disc served as a control, another punctured with a needle, and the others injected with metrizamide, hypaque, or saline, At 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 weeks postoperative, two dogs were killed at each time interval. Examination of the discs revealed no gross differences between any of the groups. The normal gross architecture of the concentric annulus and gelatinous nucleus was maintained in all specimens. This study found no evidence that discography results in gross or histologic damage to the intervertebral disc. It does not appear that discography will predispose a normal intervertebral disc to herniate. Discography alone appears to be a safe diagnostic procedure with no experimental evidence of any untoward gross or histologic effects.     

The system and procedures of percutaneous intradiscal laser nucleotomy

Since 1986, percutaneous intradiscal laser nucleotomy (PILN) has been studied in the authors' laser laboratory. The purpose of this report is to develop PILN as an alternative to chemonucleolysis and percutaneous discectomy, which are currently applied, and to establish a safe, easy, accurate and short-time therapy method for lumbar disc herniation. After laser irradiation, intradiscal pressures (IDP) decreased and the nucleus pulposus was gradually replaced with cartilaginous fibrous tissue. The evaluation of heat distribution with thermocouples and thermography was done to determine safe optimum irradiating conditions and to develop a new double-lumen needle and a bare quartz fiber. Neodymium-yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd-YAG) laser devices have been improved for easy and safe use, and a new tip type pressure transducer has been made for improved therapeutic results using this new method.     

Roentgenographic evaluation of ossification and calcification of the lumbar spinal canal after intradiscal betamethasone injection

There have been reports of lumbar spinal canal ossification and calcification after triamcinolone intradiscal injection therapy. Our objective was to observe the roentgenographic changes after betamethasone intradiscal injection therapy for lumbar disc diseases. The subjects were 183 patients (498 discs; 130 men and 53 women) who underwent discography and betamethasone intradiscal injection therapy and were followed for a mean of 5 years and 7 months. Ossification and calcification appeared de novo (three patients, three discs) or enlarged (four patients, five discs) in the outer layer of the posterior annulus fibrosus or posterior longitudinal ligament in eight discs among seven patients (3.8%). The incidence and degree of ossification and calcification in our patients were significantly lower than those reported in previous studies, and a long time elapsed before ossification and calcification appeared or enlarged. Intradiscal injection of betamethasone did not appear to confer any incremental relative risk for lumbar spinal canal ossification and calcification based on review of follow-up roentgenographs.     

Comparison of discographic findings in asymptomatic subject discs and the negative discs of chronic LBP patients: can discography distinguish asymptomatic discs among morphologically abnormal discs?

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Lumbar discography has been widely used for evaluating discogenic low back pain (LBP). Comparison of pain responses from suspected symptomatic discs with pain responses from asymptomatic negative discs is routine. However, the ability of discography to distinguish asymptomatic morphologically abnormal discs from those that are symptomatic has been understudied. In addition, the discographic characteristics of negative discs in patients with chronic discogenic LBP have not been reported. Criteria for negative morphologically abnormal discs may be valuable for excluding discs from further treatment and examination. PURPOSE: To determine if discography can distinguish asymptomatic discs among morphologically abnormal discs in patients with suspected chronic discogenic LBP and establish the standard characteristics of negative discs. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Prospective, experimental with control group. PATIENT SAMPLE: Fifty-five discs from a control group of 16 healthy volunteers without current back pain (11 men, 5 women, 32-61 years of age, mean age: 47 years) and 282 discs from a patient group of 90 LBP patients (59 men, 31 women, 20-70 years of age, mean age: 44.7 years) were recruited. METHODS: Discography was performed using a pressure-controlled manometric technique with an injection rate of 0.05 mL/s and a 3.5 mL restricted total volume. Concordance was rated as none/unfamiliar, or familiar. Pain was rated via a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS). The pressure and volume at which pain was evoked and NRS pain responses at 15, 30, and 50 psi were recorded. Annular disruption grade was rated during the procedure by computed tomography discography and fluoroscopic imaging. Negative discogram required no pain described by the participant as "familiar," with no pain responses >or=6/10 NRS at pressures 相似文献