Optimal Mean Airway Pressure during High-frequency Oscillation: Predicted by the Pressure-Volume Curve

Background: A number of groups have recommended setting positive end-expiratory pressure during conventional mechanical ventilation in adults at 2 cm H2O above the lower corner pressure (PCL) of the inspiratory pressure-volume (P-V) curve of the respiratory system. No equivalent recommendations for the setting of the mean airway pressure (Paw) during high-frequency oscillation (HFO) exist. The authors questioned if the Paw resulting in the best oxygenation without hemodynamic compromise during HFO is related to the static P-V curve in a large animal model of acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Methods: Saline lung lavage was performed in seven sheep (28 +/- 5 kg, mean +/- SD) until the arterial oxygen partial pressure/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio decreased to 85 +/- 27 mmHg at a positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cm H2O (initial injury). The PCL (20 +/- 1 cm H2O) on the inflation limb and the point of maximum curvature change (PMC; 26 +/- 1 cm H2O) on the deflation limb of the static P-V curve were determined. The sheep were subjected to four 1-h cycles of HFO at different levels of Paw (PCL + 2, + 6, + 10, + 14 cm H2O), applied in random order. Each cycle was preceded by a recruitment maneuver at a sustained Paw of 50 cm H2O for 60 s.

Results: High-frequency oscillation with a Paw of 6 cm H2O above PCL (PCL + 6) resulted in a significant improvement in oxygenation (P < 0.01 vs. initial injury). No further improvement in oxygenation was observed with higher Paw, but cardiac output decreased, pulmonary vascular resistance increased, and oxygen delivery decreased at Paw greater than PCL + 6. The PMC on the deflation limb of the P-V curve was equal to the PCL + 6 (r = 0.77, P < 0.05).     

Setting Mean Airway Pressure during High-frequency Oscillatory Ventilation According to the Static Pressure-Volume Curve in Surfactant-deficient Lung Injury: A Computed Tomography Study

Background: Numerous studies suggest setting positive end-expiratory pressure during conventional ventilation according to the static pressure-volume (P-V) curve, whereas data on how to adjust mean airway pressure (Paw) during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) are still scarce. The aims of the current study were to (1) examine the respiratory and hemodynamic effects of setting Paw during HFOV according to the static P-V curve, (2) assess the effect of increasing and decreasing Paw on slice volumes and aeration patterns at the lung apex and base using computed tomography, and (3) study the suitability of the P-V curve to set Paw by comparing computed tomography findings during HFOV with those obtained during recording of the static P-V curve at comparable pressures.

Methods: Saline lung lavage was performed in seven adult pigs. P-V curves were obtained with computed tomography scanning at each volume step at the lung apex and base. The lower inflection point (Pflex) was determined, and HFOV was started with Paw set at Pflex. The pigs were provided five 1-h cycles of HFOV. Paw, first set at Pflex, was increased to 1.5 times Pflex (termed 1.5 Pflexinc) and 2 Pflex and decreased thereafter to 1.5 times Pflex and Pflex (termed 1.5 Pflexdec and Pflexdec). Hourly measurements of respiratory and hemodynamic variables as well as computed tomography scans at the apex and base were made.

Results: High-frequency oscillatory ventilation at a Paw of 1.5 Pflexinc reestablished preinjury arterial oxygen tension values. Further increase in Paw did not change oxygenation, but it decreased oxygen delivery as a result of decreased cardiac output. No differences in respiratory or hemodynamic variables were observed when comparing HFOV at corresponding Paw during increasing and decreasing Paw. Variation in total slice lung volume (TLVs) was far less than expected from the static P-V curve. Overdistended lung volume was constant and less than 3% of TLVs. TLVs values during HFOV at Pflex, 1.5 Pflexinc, and 2 Pflex were significantly greater than TLVs values at corresponding tracheal pressures on the inflation limb of the static P-V curve and located near the deflation limb. In contrast, TLVs values during HFOV at decreasing Paw (i.e., 1.5 Pflexdec and Pflexdec) were not significantly greater than corresponding TLV on the deflation limb of the static P-V curves. The marked hysteresis observed during static P-V curve recordings was absent during HFOV.     

Setting mean airway pressure during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation according to the static pressure--volume curve in surfactant-deficient lung injury: a computed tomography study

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies suggest setting positive end-expiratory pressure during conventional ventilation according to the static pressure-volume (P-V) curve, whereas data on how to adjust mean airway pressure (P(aw)) during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) are still scarce. The aims of the current study were to (1) examine the respiratory and hemodynamic effects of setting P(aw) during HFOV according to the static P-V curve, (2) assess the effect of increasing and decreasing P(aw) on slice volumes and aeration patterns at the lung apex and base using computed tomography, and (3) study the suitability of the P-V curve to set P(aw) by comparing computed tomography findings during HFOV with those obtained during recording of the static P-V curve at comparable pressures. METHODS: Saline lung lavage was performed in seven adult pigs. P-V curves were obtained with computed tomography scanning at each volume step at the lung apex and base. The lower inflection point (Pflex) was determined, and HFOV was started with P(aw) set at Pflex. The pigs were provided five 1-h cycles of HFOV. P(aw), first set at Pflex, was increased to 1.5 times Pflex (termed 1.5 Pflex(inc)) and 2 Pflex and decreased thereafter to 1.5 times Pflex and Pflex (termed 1.5 Pflex(dec) and Pflex(dec)). Hourly measurements of respiratory and hemodynamic variables as well as computed tomography scans at the apex and base were made. RESULTS: High-frequency oscillatory ventilation at a P(aw) of 1.5 Pflex(inc) reestablished preinjury arterial oxygen tension values. Further increase in P(aw) did not change oxygenation, but it decreased oxygen delivery as a result of decreased cardiac output. No differences in respiratory or hemodynamic variables were observed when comparing HFOV at corresponding P(aw) during increasing and decreasing P(aw). Variation in total slice lung volume (TLVs) was far less than expected from the static P-V curve. Overdistended lung volume was constant and less than 3% of TLVs. TLVs values during HFOV at Pflex, 1.5 Pflex(inc), and 2 Pflex were significantly greater than TLVs values at corresponding tracheal pressures on the inflation limb of the static P-V curve and located near the deflation limb. In contrast, TLVs values during HFOV at decreasing P(aw) (i.e., 1.5 Pflex(dec) and Pflex(dec)) were not significantly greater than corresponding TLV on the deflation limb of the static P-V curves. The marked hysteresis observed during static P-V curve recordings was absent during HFOV. CONCLUSIONS: High-frequency oscillatory ventilation using P(aw) set according to a static P-V curve results in effective lung recruitment, and slice lung volumes during HFOV are equal to those from the deflation limb of the static P-V curve at equivalent pressures.     

Open-lung Protective Ventilation with Pressure Control Ventilation, High-frequency Oscillation, and Intratracheal Pulmonary Ventilation Results in Similar Gas Exchange, Hemodynamics, and Lung Mechanics

Background: Pressure control ventilation (PCV), high-frequency oscillation (HFO), and intratracheal pulmonary ventilation (ITPV) may all be used to provide lung protective ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome, but the specific approach that is optimal remains controversial.

Methods: Saline lavage was used to produce acute respiratory distress syndrome in 21 sheep randomly assigned to receive PCV, HFO, or ITPV as follows: positive end-expiratory pressure (PCV and ITPV) and mean airway pressure (HFO) were set in a pressure-decreasing manner after lung recruitment that achieved a ratio of Pao2/Fio2 > 400 mmHg. Respiratory rates were 30 breaths/min, 120 breaths/min, and 8 Hz, respectively, for PCV, ITPV, and HFO. Eucapnia was targeted with peak carinal pressure of no more than 35 cm H2O. Animals were then ventilated for 4 h.

Results: There were no differences among groups in gas exchange, lung mechanics, or hemodynamics. Tidal volume (PCV, 8.9 +/- 2.1 ml/kg; ITPV, 2.7 +/- 0.8 ml/kg; HFO, approximately 2.0 ml/kg) and peak carinal pressure (PCV, 30.6 +/- 2.6 cm H2O; ITPV, 22.3 +/- 4.8 cm H2O; HFO, approximately 24.3 cm H2O) were higher in PCV. Pilot histologic data showed greater interstitial hemorrhage and alveolar septal expansion in PCV than in HFO or ITPV.     

Relation of the static compliance curve and positive end-expiratory pressure to oxygenation during one-lung ventilation.

BACKGROUND: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is commonly applied to the ventilated lung to try to improve oxygenation during one-lung ventilation but is an unreliable therapy and occasionally causes arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO(2)) to decrease further. The current study examined whether the effects of PEEP on oxygenation depend on the static compliance curve of the lung to which it is applied. METHODS: Forty-two adults undergoing thoracic surgery were studied during stable, open-chest, one-lung ventilation. Arterial blood gases were measured during two-lung ventilation and one-lung ventilation before, during, and after the application of 5 cm H(2)O PEEP to the ventilated lung. The plateau end-expiratory pressure and static compliance curve of the ventilated lung were measured with and without applied PEEP, and the lower inflection point was determined from the compliance curve. RESULTS: Mean (+/- SD) PaO(2) values, with a fraction of inspired oxygen of 1.0, were not different during one-lung ventilation before (192 +/- 91 mmHg), during (190 +/- 90), or after ( 205 +/- 79) the addition of 5 cm H(2)O PEEP. The mean plateau end-expiratory pressure increased from 4.2 to 6.8 cm H(2)O with the application of 5 cm H(2)O PEEP and decreased to 4.5 cm H(2)O when 5 cm H(2)O PEEP was removed. Six patients showed a clinically useful (> 20%) increase in PaO(2) with 5 cm H(2)O PEEP, and nine patients had a greater than 20% decrease in PaO(2). The change in PaO(2) with the application of 5 cm H(2)O PEEP correlated in an inverse fashion with the change in the gradient between the end-expiratory pressure and the pressure at the lower inflection point (r = 0.76). The subgroup of patients with a PaO(2) during two-lung ventilation that was less than the mean (365 mmHg) and an end-expiratory pressure during one-lung ventilation without applied PEEP less than the mean were more likely to have an increase in PaO(2) when 5 cm H(2)O PEEP was applied. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of the application of external 5 cm H(2)O PEEP on oxygenation during one-lung ventilation correspond to individual changes in the relation between the plateau end-expiratory pressure and the inflection point of the static compliance curve. When the application of PEEP causes the end-expiratory pressure to increase from a low level toward the inflection point, oxygenation is likely to improve. Conversely, if the addition of PEEP causes an increased inflation of the ventilated lung that raises the equilibrium end-expiratory pressure beyond the inflection point, oxygenation is likely to deteriorate.     

Open-lung protective ventilation with pressure control ventilation, high-frequency oscillation, and intratracheal pulmonary ventilation results in similar gas exchange, hemodynamics, and lung mechanics

BACKGROUND: Pressure control ventilation (PCV), high-frequency oscillation (HFO), and intratracheal pulmonary ventilation (ITPV) may all be used to provide lung protective ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome, but the specific approach that is optimal remains controversial. METHODS: Saline lavage was used to produce acute respiratory distress syndrome in 21 sheep randomly assigned to receive PCV, HFO, or ITPV as follows: positive end-expiratory pressure (PCV and ITPV) and mean airway pressure (HFO) were set in a pressure-decreasing manner after lung recruitment that achieved a ratio of Pao2/Fio2 > 400 mmHg. Respiratory rates were 30 breaths/min, 120 breaths/min, and 8 Hz, respectively, for PCV, ITPV, and HFO. Eucapnia was targeted with peak carinal pressure of no more than 35 cm H2O. Animals were then ventilated for 4 h. RESULTS: There were no differences among groups in gas exchange, lung mechanics, or hemodynamics. Tidal volume (PCV, 8.9 +/- 2.1 ml/kg; ITPV, 2.7 +/- 0.8 ml/kg; HFO, approximately 2.0 ml/kg) and peak carinal pressure (PCV, 30.6 +/- 2.6 cm H2O; ITPV, 22.3 +/- 4.8 cm H2O; HFO, approximately 24.3 cm H2O) were higher in PCV. Pilot histologic data showed greater interstitial hemorrhage and alveolar septal expansion in PCV than in HFO or ITPV. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that HFO, ITPV, and PCV when applied with an open-lung protective ventilatory strategy results in the same gas exchange, lung mechanics, and hemodynamic response, but pilot data indicate that lung injury may be greater with PCV.     

Effects of the beach chair position, positive end-expiratory pressure, and pneumoperitoneum on respiratory function in morbidly obese patients during anesthesia and paralysis

BACKGROUND: The authors studied the effects of the beach chair (BC) position, 10 cm H2O positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and pneumoperitoneum on respiratory function in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric banding. METHODS: The authors studied 20 patients (body mass index 42 +/- 5 kg/m2) during the supine and BC positions, before and after pneumoperitoneum was instituted (13.6 +/- 1.2 mmHg). PEEP was applied during each combination of position and pneumoperitoneum. The authors measured elastance (E,rs) of the respiratory system, end-expiratory lung volume (helium technique), and arterial oxygen tension. Pressure-volume curves were also taken (occlusion technique). Patients were paralyzed during total intravenous anesthesia. Tidal volume (10.5 +/- 1 ml/kg ideal body weight) and respiratory rate (11 +/- 1 breaths/min) were kept constant throughout. RESULTS: In the supine position, respiratory function was abnormal: E,rs was 21.71 +/- 5.26 cm H2O/l, and end-expiratory lung volume was 0.46 +/- 0.1 l. Both the BC position and PEEP improved E,rs (P < 0.01). End-expiratory lung volume almost doubled (0.83 +/- 0.3 and 0.85 +/- 0.3 l, BC and PEEP, respectively; P < 0.01 vs. supine zero end-expiratory pressure), with no evidence of lung recruitment (0.04 +/- 0.1 l in the supine and 0.07 +/- 0.2 in the BC position). PEEP was associated with higher airway pressures than the BC position (22.1 +/- 2.01 vs. 13.8 +/- 1.8 cm H2O; P < 0.01). Pneumoperitoneum further worsened E,rs (31.59 +/- 6.73; P < 0.01) and end-expiratory lung volume (0.35 +/- 0.1 l; P < 0.01). Changes of lung volume correlated with changes of oxygenation (linear regression, R2 = 0.524, P < 0.001) so that during pneumoperitoneum, only the combination of the BC position and PEEP improved oxygenation. CONCLUSIONS: The BC position and PEEP counteracted the major derangements of respiratory function produced by anesthesia and paralysis. During pneumoperitoneum, only the combination of the two maneuvers improved oxygenation.     

Effects of the Beach Chair Position, Positive End-expiratory Pressure, and Pneumoperitoneum on Respiratory Function in Morbidly Obese Patients during Anesthesia and Paralysis

Background: The authors studied the effects of the beach chair (BC) position, 10 cm H2O positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and pneumoperitoneum on respiratory function in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric banding.

Methods: The authors studied 20 patients (body mass index 42 +/- 5 kg/m2) during the supine and BC positions, before and after pneumoperitoneum was instituted (13.6 +/- 1.2 mmHg). PEEP was applied during each combination of position and pneumoperitoneum. The authors measured elastance (E,rs) of the respiratory system, end-expiratory lung volume (helium technique), and arterial oxygen tension. Pressure-volume curves were also taken (occlusion technique). Patients were paralyzed during total intravenous anesthesia. Tidal volume (10.5 +/- 1 ml/kg ideal body weight) and respiratory rate (11 +/- 1 breaths/min) were kept constant throughout.

Results: In the supine position, respiratory function was abnormal: E,rs was 21.71 +/- 5.26 cm H2O/l, and end-expiratory lung volume was 0.46 +/- 0.1 l. Both the BC position and PEEP improved E,rs (P < 0.01). End-expiratory lung volume almost doubled (0.83 +/- 0.3 and 0.85 +/- 0.3 l, BC and PEEP, respectively; P < 0.01 vs. supine zero end-expiratory pressure), with no evidence of lung recruitment (0.04 +/- 0.1 l in the supine and 0.07 +/- 0.2 in the BC position). PEEP was associated with higher airway pressures than the BC position (22.1 +/- 2.01 vs. 13.8 +/- 1.8 cm H2O; P < 0.01). Pneumoperitoneum further worsened E,rs (31.59 +/- 6.73; P < 0.01) and end-expiratory lung volume (0.35 +/- 0.1 l; P < 0.01). Changes of lung volume correlated with changes of oxygenation (linear regression, R2 = 0.524, P < 0.001) so that during pneumoperitoneum, only the combination of the BC position and PEEP improved oxygenation.     

Respiratory mechanics and intrinsic PEEP during ketamine and halothane anesthesia in young children

Static compliance of the respiratory system (Crs) was measured by the interrupter technique in 18 anesthetized children to compare the effects of ketamine on Crs with those of halothane. Crs was the slope of the pressure-volume (P-V) curve obtained by repeated brief airway occlusions throughout relaxed expiration, and the intercept of the P-V curve on the pressure axis was the intrinsic positive end-expiratory airway pressure (PEEPi). Expiratory time (Te) was measured during a period of quiet breathing, and the passive expiratory time constant (tau) was measured during the relaxed expiration after an end-inspiratory occlusion. Nine children were anesthetized with a continuous infusion of ketamine and a matching group of nine children inhaled halothane in oxygen. Crs was significantly greater in the ketamine group (22.8 +/- 6.2 ml/cm H2O) than in the halothane group (15.7 +/- 5.5 ml/cm H2O). The tau value was also significantly greater in the ketamine group. Mean PEEPi in the ketamine group was 2.3 +/- 1.8 cm H2O and in the halothane group was 0.4 +/- 0.8 cm H2O. PEEPi correlated inversely with Te/tau according to a logarithmic function. It was concluded that, in children anesthetized with ketamine, Crs is significantly greater than that in children anesthetized with halothane, and the resultant prolongation of tau and decreased Te/tau with ketamine anesthesia lead to increased PEEPi.     

Relation of the Static Compliance Curve and Positive End-expiratory Pressure to Oxygenation during One-lung Ventilation

Background : Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is commonly applied to the ventilated lung to try to improve oxygenation during one-lung ventilation but is an unreliable therapy and occasionally causes arterial oxygen partial pressure (Pao2) to decrease further. The current study examined whether the effects of PEEP on oxygenation depend on the static compliance curve of the lung to which it is applied.

Methods : Forty-two adults undergoing thoracic surgery were studied during stable, open-chest, one-lung ventilation. Arterial blood gasses were measured during two-lung ventilation and one-lung ventilation before, during, and after the application of 5 cm H2O PEEP to the ventilated lung. The plateau end-expiratory pressure and static compliance curve of the ventilated lung were measured with and without applied PEEP, and the lower inflection point was determined from the compliance curve.

Results : Mean (+/- SD) Pao2 values, with a fraction of inspired oxygen of 1.0, were not different during one-lung ventilation before (192 +/- 91 mmHg), during (190 +/- 90), or after ( 205 +/- 79) the addition of 5 cm H2O PEEP. The mean plateau end-expiratory pressure increased from 4.2 to 6.8 cm H2O with the application of 5 cm H2O PEEP and decreased to 4.5 cm H2O when 5 cm H2O PEEP was removed. Six patients showed a clinically useful (> 20%) increase in Pao2 with 5 cm H2O PEEP, and nine patients had a greater than 20% decrease in Pao2. The change in Pao2 with the application of 5 cm H2O PEEP correlated in an inverse fashion with the change in the gradient between the end-expiratory pressure and the pressure at the lower inflection point (r = 0.76). The subgroup of patients with a Pao2 during two-lung ventilation that was less than the mean (365 mmHg) and an end-expiratory pressure during one-lung ventilation without applied PEEP less than the mean were more likely to have an increase in Pao2 when 5 cm H2O PEEP was applied.     

Set positive end-expiratory pressure during protective ventilation affects lung injury

BACKGROUND: The most appropriate method of determining positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level during a lung protective ventilatory strategy has not been established. METHODS: In a lavage-injured sheep acute respiratory distress syndrome model, the authors compared the effects of three approaches to determining PEEP level after a recruitment maneuver: (1) 2 cm H(2)O above the lower inflection point on the inflation pressure-volume curve, (2) at the point of maximum curvature on the deflation pressure-volume curve, and (3) at the PEEP level that maintained target arterial oxygen partial pressure at a fraction of inspired oxygen of 0.5. RESULTS: Positive end-expiratory pressure set 2 cm H(2)O above the lower inflection point resulted in the least injury over the course of the study. PEEP based on adequate arterial oxygen partial pressure/fraction of inspired oxygen ratios had to be increased over time and resulted in higher mRNA levels for interleukin-8 and interleukin-1beta and greater tissue inflammation when compared with the other approaches. PEEP at the point of maximum curvature could not maintain eucapneia even at an increased ventilatory rate. CONCLUSION: Although generating higher plateau pressures, PEEP levels based on pressure-volume curve analysis were more effective in maintaining gas exchange and minimizing injury than PEEP based on adequate oxygenation. PEEP at 2 cm H(2)O above the lower inflection point was most effective.     

Effects of recruiting maneuvers in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome ventilated with protective ventilatory strategy

BACKGROUND: A lung-protective ventilatory strategy with low tidal volume (VT) has been proposed for use in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Alveolar derecruitment may occur during the use of a lung-protective ventilatory strategy and may be prevented by recruiting maneuvers. This study examined the hypothesis that the effectiveness of a recruiting maneuver to improve oxygenation in patients with ARDS would be influenced by the elastic properties of the lung and chest wall. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with ARDS were studied during use of the ARDSNet lung-protective ventilatory strategy: VT was set at 6 ml/kg predicted body weight and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and inspiratory oxygen fraction (Fio2) were set to obtain an arterial oxygen saturation of 90-95% and/or an arterial oxygen partial pressure (Pao2) of 60- 80 mmHg (baseline). Measurements of Pao2/Fio2, static volume-pressure curve, recruited volume (vertical shift of the volume-pressure curve), and chest wall and lung elastance (EstW and EstL: esophageal pressure) were obtained on zero end-expiratory pressure, at baseline, and at 2 and 20 min after application of a recruiting maneuver (40 cm H2O of continuous positive airway pressure for 40 s). Cardiac output (transesophageal Doppler) and mean arterial pressure were measured immediately before, during, and immediately after the recruiting maneuver. Patients were classified a priori as responders and nonresponders on the basis of the occurrence or nonoccurrence of a 50% increase in Pao2/Fio2 after the recruiting maneuver. RESULTS: Recruiting maneuvers increased Pao2/Fio2 by 20 +/- 3% in nonresponders (n = 11) and by 175 +/- 23% (n = 11; mean +/- standard deviation) in responders. On zero end-expiratory pressure, EstL (28.4 +/- 2.2 vs. 24.2 +/- 2.9 cm H2O/l) and EstW (10.4 +/- 1.8 vs. 5.6 +/- 0.8 cm H2O/l) were higher in nonresponders than in responders (P < 0.01). Nonresponders had been ventilated for a longer period of time than responders (7 +/- 1 vs. 1 +/- 0.3 days; P < 0.001). Cardiac output and mean arterial pressure decreased by 31 +/- 2 and 19 +/- 3% in nonresponders and by 2 +/- 1 and 2 +/- 1% in responders (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Application of recruiting maneuvers improves oxygenation only in patients with early ARDS who do not have impairment of chest wall mechanics and with a large potential for recruitment, as indicated by low values of EstL.     

根据静态压力-容量曲线指导开胸手术病人保护性单肺通气的效果

目的 评价根据静态压力.容积曲线(P-V曲线)设置开胸手术病人的呼气末正压(PEEP)行单肺通气(OLV)的效果.方法 择期行肺叶切除术病人120例,性别不限,年龄20～60岁,体重40～ 80 kg,ASA分级Ⅱ或Ⅲ级.双肺通气(TLV)3 min后,描绘准静态P-V曲线,确定P-V曲线低位拐点对应的压力(PLIP).采用随机数字表法,将病人随机分为5组(n＝24):对照组(C组)和不同保护性OLV方式组(P1～4组).C组PEEP为0,vT为10 ml/kg;P1组PEEP为0,vT为6ml/kg; P2组PEEP为PLIP,-2 cm H2O,VT为6ml/kg;P3组PEEP为PLIP,VT为6 ml/kg;P4组PEEP为PLIP+2 cmH2O,VT为6 ml/kg.分别于TLV和OLV呼吸力学指标平稳后,记录气道峰压、气道平台压、气道阻力和肺顺应性.分别于麻醉诱导前、TLV 20 min和OLV 20 min时,取动脉血样,进行血气分析,计算肺内分流率.分别于OLV开始时和OLV结束时采集动脉血样,采用酶联免疫吸附法测定血浆II-6和TNF-α的浓度.结果 与C组比较,P4组TLV和OLV呼吸力学指标平稳后气道峰压和气道平台压升高,气道阻力降低,OLV结束时血浆IL-6浓度降低,P1组、P2组、P3组和P4组PaC02升高(P<0.05或0.01);P1组、P2组和P3组各呼吸力学指标、血气分析指标和血浆IL-6和TNF-α的浓度比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).与P1组、P2组和P3组比较,P4组气道峰压和气道平台压升高,OLV结束时血浆IL-6浓度降低(P<0.05或0.01).结论 VT为6 ml/kg,根据PLIP+2 cm H2O确定PEEP,有助于改善开胸手术病人的氧合,抑制炎性反应,是保护性OLV的有效手段.     

Effects of Recruiting Maneuvers in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Ventilated with Protective Ventilatory Strategy

Background: A lung-protective ventilatory strategy with low tidal volume (VT) has been proposed for use in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Alveolar derecruitment may occur during the use of a lung-protective ventilatory strategy and may be prevented by recruiting maneuvers. This study examined the hypothesis that the effectiveness of a recruiting maneuver to improve oxygenation in patients with ARDS would be influenced by the elastic properties of the lung and chest wall.

Methods: Twenty-two patients with ARDS were studied during use of the ARDSNet lung-protective ventilatory strategy: VT was set at 6 ml/kg predicted body weight and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and inspiratory oxygen fraction (Fio2) were set to obtain an arterial oxygen saturation of 90-95% and/or an arterial oxygen partial pressure (Pao2) of 60- 80 mmHg (baseline). Measurements of Pao2/Fio2, static volume-pressure curve, recruited volume (vertical shift of the volume-pressure curve), and chest wall and lung elastance (EstW and EstL: esophageal pressure) were obtained on zero end-expiratory pressure, at baseline, and at 2 and 20 min after application of a recruiting maneuver (40 cm H2O of continuous positive airway pressure for 40 s). Cardiac output (transesophageal Doppler) and mean arterial pressure were measured immediately before, during, and immediately after the recruiting maneuver. Patients were classified a priori as responders and nonresponders on the basis of the occurrence or nonoccurrence of a 50% increase in Pao2/Fio2 after the recruiting maneuver.

Results: Recruiting maneuvers increased Pao2/Fio2 by 20 +/- 3% in nonresponders (n = 11) and by 175 +/- 23% (n = 11; mean +/- standard deviation) in responders. On zero end-expiratory pressure, EstL (28.4 +/- 2.2 vs. 24.2 +/- 2.9 cm H2O/l) and EstW (10.4 +/- 1.8 vs. 5.6 +/- 0.8 cm H2O/l) were higher in nonresponders than in responders (P < 0.01). Nonresponders had been ventilated for a longer period of time than responders (7 +/- 1 vs. 1 +/- 0.3 days;P < 0.001). Cardiac output and mean arterial pressure decreased by 31 +/- 2 and 19 +/- 3% in nonresponders and by 2 +/- 1 and 2 +/- 1% in responders (P < 0.01).     

Positive End-expiratory Pressure Improves Respiratory Function in Obese but not in Normal Subjects during Anesthesia and Paralysis

Background: Morbidly obese patients, during anesthesia and paralysis, experience more severe impairment of respiratory mechanics and gas exchange than normal subjects. The authors hypothesized that positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) induces different responses in normal subjects (n = 9; body mass index < 25 kg/m2) versus obese patients (n = 9; body mass index > 40 kg/m2).

Methods: The authors measured lung volumes (helium technique), the elastances of the respiratory system, lung, and chest wall, the pressure-volume curves (occlusion technique and esophageal balloon), and the intraabdominal pressure (intrabladder catheter) at PEEP 0 and 10 cm H2O in paralyzed, anesthetized postoperative patients in the intensive care unit or operating room after abdominal surgery.

Results: At PEEP 0 cm H2O, obese patients had lower lung volume (0.59 +/- 0.17 vs. 2.15 +/- 0.58 l [mean +/- SD], P < 0.01); higher elastances of the respiratory system (26.8 +/- 4.2 vs. 16.4 +/- 3.6 cm H2O/l, P < 0.01), lung (17.4 +/- 4.5 vs. 10.3 +/- 3.2 cm H2O/l, P < 0.01), and chest wall (9.4 +/- 3.0 vs. 6.1 +/- 1.4 cm H2O/l, P < 0.01); and higher intraabdominal pressure (18.8 +/- 7.8 vs. 9.0 +/- 2.4 cm H2O, P < 0.01) than normal subjects. The arterial oxygen tension was significantly lower (110 +/- 30 vs. 218 +/- 47 mmHg, P < 0.01; inspired oxygen fraction = 50%), and the arterial carbon dioxide tension significantly higher (37.8 +/- 6.8 vs. 28.4 +/- 3.1, P < 0.01) in obese patients compared with normal subjects. Increasing PEEP to 10 cm H2O significantly reduced elastances of the respiratory system, lung, and chest wall in obese patients but not in normal subjects. The pressure-volume curves were shifted upward and to the left in obese patients but were unchanged in normal subjects. The oxygenation increased with PEEP in obese patients (from 110 +/- 30 to 130 +/- 28 mmHg, P < 0.01) but was unchanged in normal subjects. The oxygenation changes were significantly correlated with alveolar recruitment (r = 0.81, P < 0.01).     

Positive end-expiratory pressure improves respiratory function in obese but not in normal subjects during anesthesia and paralysis.

BACKGROUND: Morbidly obese patients, during anesthesia and paralysis, experience more severe impairment of respiratory mechanics and gas exchange than normal subjects. The authors hypothesized that positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) induces different responses in normal subjects (n = 9; body mass index < 25 kg/m2) versus obese patients (n = 9; body mass index > 40 kg/m2). METHODS: The authors measured lung volumes (helium technique), the elastances of the respiratory system, lung, and chest wall, the pressure-volume curves (occlusion technique and esophageal balloon), and the intraabdominal pressure (intrabladder catheter) at PEEP 0 and 10 cm H2O in paralyzed, anesthetized postoperative patients in the intensive care unit or operating room after abdominal surgery. RESULTS: At PEEP 0 cm H2O, obese patients had lower lung volume (0.59 +/- 0.17 vs. 2.15 +/- 0.58 l [mean +/- SD], P < 0.01); higher elastances of the respiratory system (26.8 +/- 4.2 vs. 16.4 +/- 3.6 cm H2O/l, P < 0.01), lung (17.4 +/- 4.5 vs. 10.3 +/- 3.2 cm H2O/l, P < 0.01), and chest wall (9.4 +/- 3.0 vs. 6.1 +/- 1.4 cm H2O/l, P < 0.01); and higher intraabdominal pressure (18.8 +/-7.8 vs. 9.0 +/- 2.4 cm H2O, P < 0.01) than normal subjects. The arterial oxygen tension was significantly lower (110 +/- 30 vs. 218 +/- 47 mmHg, P < 0.01; inspired oxygen fraction = 50%), and the arterial carbon dioxide tension significantly higher (37.8 +/- 6.8 vs. 28.4 +/- 3.1, P < 0.01) in obese patients compared with normal subjects. Increasing PEEP to 10 cm H2O significantly reduced elastances of the respiratory system, lung, and chest wall in obese patients but not in normal subjects. The pressure-volume curves were shifted upward and to the left in obese patients but were unchanged in normal subjects. The oxygenation increased with PEEP in obese patients (from 110 +/-30 to 130 +/- 28 mmHg, P < 0.01) but was unchanged in normal subjects. The oxygenation changes were significantly correlated with alveolar recruitment (r = 0.81, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: During anesthesia and paralysis, PEEP improves respiratory function in morbidly obese patients but not in normal subjects.     

Pressure support ventilation versus continuous positive airway pressure ventilation with the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized crossover study of anesthetized pediatric patients

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and pressure support ventilation (PSV) improve gas exchange in adults, but there are little published data regarding children. We compared the efficacy of PSV with CPAP in anesthetized children managed with the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. Patients were randomized into two equal-sized crossover groups and data were collected before surgery. In Group 1, patients underwent CPAP, PSV, and CPAP in sequence. In Group 2, patients underwent PSV, CPAP, and PSV in sequence. PSV comprised positive end-expiratory pressure set at 3 cm H(2)O and inspiratory pressure support set at 10 cm H(2)O above positive end-expiratory pressure. CPAP was set at 3 cm H(2)O. Each ventilatory mode was maintained for 5 min. The following data were recorded at each ventilatory mode: ETco(2), Spo(2), expired tidal volume, peak airway pressure, work of breathing patient (WOB), delta esophageal pressure, pressure time product, respiratory drive, inspiratory time fraction, respiratory rate, noninvasive mean arterial blood pressure, and heart rate. In Group 1, measurements for CPAP were similar before and after PSV. In Group 2, measurements for PSV were similar before and after CPAP. When compared with CPAP, PSV had lower ETco(2) (46 +/- 6 versus 52 +/- 7 mm Hg; P < 0.001), slower respiratory rate (24 +/- 6 versus 30 +/- 6 min(-1); P < 0.001), lower WOB (0.54 +/- 0.54 versus 0.95 +/- 0.72 JL(-1); P < 0.05), lower pressure time product (94 +/- 88 versus 150 +/- 90 cm H(2)O s(-1)min(-1); P < 0.001), lower delta esophageal pressure (10.6 +/- 7.4 versus 14.1 +/- 8.9 cm H(2)O; P < 0.05), lower inspiratory time fraction (29% +/- 3% versus 34% +/- 5%; P < 0.001), and higher expired tidal volume (179 +/- 50 versus 129 +/- 44 mL; P < 0.001). There were no differences in Spo(2), respiratory drive, mean arterial blood pressure, and heart rate. We conclude that PSV improves gas exchange and reduces WOB during ProSeal laryngeal mask airway anesthesia compared with CPAP in ASA physical status I children aged 1-7 yr.     

Effects of end-inspiratory and end-expiratory pressures on alveolar recruitment and derecruitment in saline-washout-induced lung injury -- a computed tomography study

BACKGROUND: Lung protective ventilation using low end-inspiratory pressures and tidal volumes (VT) has been shown to impair alveolar recruitment and to promote derecruitment in acute lung injury. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of two different end-inspiratory pressure levels on alveolar recruitment, alveolar derecruitment and potential overdistention at incremental levels of positive end-expiratory pressure. METHODS: Sixteen adult sheep were randomized to be ventilated with a peak inspiratory pressure of either 35 cm H2O (P35, low VT) or 45 cm H2O (P45, high VT) after saline washout-induced lung injury. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) was increased in a stepwise manner from zero (ZEEP) to 7, 14 and 21 cm of H2O in hourly intervals. Tidal volume, initially set to 12 ml kg(-1), was reduced according to the pressure limits. Computed tomographic scans during end-expiratory and end-inspiratory hold were performed along with hemodynamic and respiratory measurements at each level of PEEP. RESULTS: Tidal volumes for the two groups (P35/P45) were: 7.7 +/- 0.9/11.2 +/- 1.3 ml kg(-1) (ZEEP), 7.9 +/- 2.1/11.3 +/- 1.3 ml kg(-1) (PEEP 7 cm H2O), 8.3 +/- 2.5/11.6 +/- 1.4 ml kg(-1) (PEEP 14 cm H2O) and 6.5 +/- 1.7/11.0 +/- 1.6 ml kg(-1) (PEEP 21 cm H2O); P < 0.001 for differences between the two groups. Absolute nonaerated lung volumes during end-expiration and end-inspiration showed no difference between the two groups for given levels of PEEP, while tidal-induced changes in nonaerated lung volume (termed cyclic alveolar instability, CAI) were larger in the P45 group at low levels of PEEP. The decrease in nonaerated lung volume was significant for PEEP 14 and 21 cm H2O in both groups compared with ZEEP (P < 0.005). Over-inflated lung volumes, although small, were significantly higher in the P45 group. Significant respiratory acidosis was noted in the P35 group despite increases in the respiratory rate. CONCLUSION: Limiting peak inspiratory pressure and VT does not impair alveolar recruitment or promote derecruitment when using sufficient levels of PEEP.     

Inspiratory pressure–volume curves at different positive end-expiratory pressure levels in patients with ALI/ARDS

BACKGROUND: In lung protective strategy, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) slightly higher than the Pflex (the airway pressure corresponding to the lower inflection point (LIP) on the inspiratory pressure-volume (P-V) curve measured with ZEEP) is generally recommended. However, this method to determine optimal PEEP lacks a theoretical background and there is no clinical report that investigated how the P-V relationship would be with such PEEP. Therefore, we measured inspiratory P-V curves at different PEEP levels to increase our knowledge about the inspiratory P-V curve with PEEP. METHODS: In eight consecutive patients with ALI/ARDS, inspiratory P-V curves were repeatedly measured at different PEEP levels by low flow inflation technique and LIP was assessed in all inspiratory P-V curves. Afterwards, the minimum PEEP level at which LIP was not identifiable (PEEP(LIP)(-)) was determined and the relationship between Pflex and PEEP(LIP)(-) was investigated. RESULTS: Pflex and PEEP(LIP)(-) could be determined in all patients. Pflex was 9.4+/-2.0 cmH2O (range: 7 to 12 cmH2O) and PEEP(LIP)(-) was 7.9+/-1.6 cmH2O (range: 5 to 10 cmH2O) (mean+/-SD, P=0.0877). PEEP(LIP)(-) was lower than the Pflex in five patients, and significantly lower than the Pflex + 2 cmH2O (P=0.0024). CONCLUSION: From the analysis of inspiratory P-V curves at different PEEP levels, PEEP 2 cmH2O higher than the Pflex may not be necessary to prevent cyclic collapse and reopening of alveoli, at least in some ALI/ARDS patients. Further studies are needed to confirm this preliminary result.     

Set Positive End-expiratory Pressure during Protective Ventilation Affects Lung Injury

Background: The most appropriate method of determining positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level during a lung protective ventilatory strategy has not been established.

Methods: In a lavage-injured sheep acute respiratory distress syndrome model, the authors compared the effects of three approaches to determining PEEP level after a recruitment maneuver: (1) 2 cm H2O above the lower inflection point on the inflation pressure-volume curve, (2) at the point of maximum curvature on the deflation pressure-volume curve, and (3) at the PEEP level that maintained target arterial oxygen partial pressure at a fraction of inspired oxygen of 0.5.

Results: Positive end-expiratory pressure set 2 cm H2O above the lower inflection point resulted in the least injury over the course of the study. PEEP based on adequate arterial oxygen partial pressure/fraction of inspired oxygen ratios had to be increased over time and resulted in higher mRNA levels for interleukin-8 and interleukin-1[beta] and greater tissue inflammation when compared with the other approaches. PEEP at the point of maximum curvature could not maintain eucapneia even at an increased ventilatory rate.