Role of faulty decision making in the satisfaction of search effect in chest radiography

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors performed this study to determine whether defective pattern recognition or defective decision making is more to blame for satisfaction of search (SOS) errors in chest radiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight chest radiographs-half of which demonstrated diverse, native abnormalities-were read by 20 observers. The radiographs were read twice, once with and once without the addition of a simulated pulmonary nodule. Observers provided a verbal account of their focus of attention, indicating suspicious features and regions considered during their inspection of the radiograph. Observers also provided a separate account of the abnormalities they would include in a radiologic report. RESULTS: When the authors considered only those reports that did not refer to the simulated nodules, they found no reduction in the area under the proper receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves in cases that contained nodules. A smaller SOS effect, however, was demonstrated with analysis of events in which the native abnormality was missed in one condition but not the other. Verbal protocols suggested that the SOS errors were mainly caused by recognition failure rather than faulty decision making. CONCLUSION: Describing their focus of attention may have prompted observers to inspect the radiographs in a more deliberate, systematic way, thus reducing the SOS effect. More residual SOS errors were caused by defective pattern recognition than by faulty decision making.     

Satisfaction of search in multitrauma patients: severity of detected fractures

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Satisfaction of search (SOS) occurs when an abnormality is missed because another abnormality has been detected. This research studied whether the severity of a detected fracture determines whether subsequent fractures are overlooked. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Each of 70 simulated multitrauma patients presented examinations of three anatomic areas. Readers evaluated each patient under two experimental conditions: when the images of the first anatomic area included a fracture (the SOS condition), and when it did not (the control condition). The SOS effect was measured on detection accuracy for subtle test fractures presented on examinations of the second and third anatomic areas. In an experiment with 12 radiology readers, the initial SOS radiographs showed nondisplaced fractures of extremities, fractures associated with low morbidity. In another experiment with 12 different radiology readers, the initial examination, usually a computed tomography scan, showed cervical and pelvic fractures of the type associated with high morbidity. Because of their more direct role in patient care, the experiment using high morbidity SOS fractures was repeated with 17 orthopedic readers. RESULTS: Detection of subtle test fractures was substantially reduced when fractures of low morbidity were added (P < .01). No similar SOS effect was observed in either experiment in which added fractures were associated with high morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: The satisfaction of search effect in skeletal radiology was replicated, essentially doubling the evidence for SOS in musculoskeletal radiology, and providing an essential contrast to the absence of SOS from high-morbidity fractures.     

Missed fractures resulting from satisfaction of search effect

This study assessed whether subtle fractures are mised in multitrauma patients because other fractures are detected. Sixty-five simulated trauma patients were each depicted in series of radiographs that were assembled from radiographs of several actual patients. The radiographs were selected to look like they belonged to a single patient. Forty-six cases included a radiograph showing a subtle fracture (which we called the “target”). In one experimental condition, none of the other radiographs in the patient’s series contained a fracture. In a second experimental condition, a radiograph containing an additional fracture (called the “distracter”) was substituted for a radiograph that had no fracture in the first experimental condition. The accuracy of detecting the target fractures was significantly reduced for cases in which the distracter fracture was reported. Awareness of the nature of this type of miss may lead to realistic strategies to avoid it. Supported by U.S. Public Health Service Grant RO1 CA 42453 from the National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.     

Can order of report prevent satisfaction of search in abdominal contrast studies?

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: A previous receiver operating characteristic (ROC) study showed a systematic shift in decision thresholds for detecting plain film abnormalities on contrast examinations rather than plain radiographs. A previous eye-position study showed that this shift was based on a relative visual neglect of plain film regions on the contrast studies. We now determine whether an intervention that changes visual search can reduce this search-based satisfaction of search effect in contrast studies of the abdomen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors measured detection of 23 plain film abnormalities in 44 patients who had plain film and contrast examinations. In 2 experiments, each plain-film and contrast study was examined independently in different sessions with observers providing a confidence rating of abnormality for each interpretation. There were 13 observers in the first experiment and 10 in the second experiment. The intervention required that for the contrast studies, observers first report abnormalities in the noncontrast region of the radiograph before reporting contrast findings. ROC curve areas for each observer in each treatment condition were estimated by using a proper ROC model. The analysis focused on changes in decision thresholds among the treatment conditions. RESULTS: The SOS effect on decision thresholds in abdominal contrast studies was replicated. Although reduced, the shift in decision thresholds in detecting plain film abnormalities on contrast examinations remained when observers were required to report those abnormalities before contrast findings. CONCLUSION: Reporting plain film abnormalities before reporting abnormalities demonstrated by contrast reduced somewhat the satisfaction of search effect on decision thresholds produced by a visual neglect of noncontrast regions on contrast examinations. This suggests that interventions that direct visual search do not offer protection against satisfaction of search effects that are based on faulty visual search.     

Early detection of thoracic spine fracture in the multiple trauma patient: Role of the initial portable chest radiograph

Early detection of thoracic spine fracture in the often unconscious multiple trauma patient is of utmost importance. Failure to recognize thoracic spine fracture early could result in neurologic injury during certain radiologic and therapeutic procedures that may be indicated for other injuries. In most trauma centers, the initial evaluation of the multiple trauma patient includes a portable chest radiograph, which may show signs of thoracic injury.To determine the value of the initial portable chest radiograph in the detection of thoracic spine fracture, 34 cases of multiple trauma patients with proven thoracic spine fractures were studied. The initial portable chest radiograph was reviewed for signs of thoracic fracture and compared with the findings on plain bone radiographs and computed tomographic scans and with the patient's medical record.Of the 34 cases, radiologic signs of fracture were initially reported in 18 patients (53%). On re-review, positive signs of fracture were seen in 27 patients (79%). The authors conclude that the initial portable chest radiograph in the multiple trauma patient must be carefully studied for subtle signs of thoracic spine fracture. The most frequent chest radiographic findings were paraspinal hematoma, decreased vertebral body height, and lateral translation of vertebral bodies. Apical pleural cap, increased interpediculate distance, increased interspinous distance (empty vertebral body sign), and rib disarticulation were also noted.     

Assessing radiographically occult upper extremity fractures with dedicated extremity MRI

Purpose: To examine the utility of low-field, dedicated extremity MRI for assessing acute upper extremity trauma in patients with radiographs that are negative for fracture. Secondly, to determine which sequences are most useful when screening for fractures. Methods: Forty-four of 46 patients with acute upper extremity trauma and initial radiographs negative for fracture were imaged with a 0.2-T MRI system. Findings were verified with follow-up clinical assessment and plain radiography. Results: In 21 patients, dedicated extremity MRI demonstrated 26 ultimately proven occult fractures, none of which were seen on the initial conventional radiographs. True fractures demonstrated marrow edema and a linear fracture line on low-field MRI. One bone contusion showed edema with no fracture line and was misdiagnosed as a fracture. Low-field MRI correctly identified 23 remaining patients with no fracture. Sensitivity and specificity for fracture in the 44 patients successfully imaged were 100 % and 96 %, respectively. Additionally, 21 soft-tissue injuries were found incidentally by MRI. However, these may not merely be incidental findings of an acute nature, but may very well be chronic, and therefore merit no specific treatment. T1-weighted gradient-echo and short-tau inversion recovery sequences demonstrated the fracture line and marrow edema to best advantage, and were thus the most useful sequences to assess fractures on low-field MRI. Conclusion: Extremity MRI is highly sensitive and specific for radiographically occult fractures of the upper extremity and can also identify associated soft-tissue injuries. In our study, the management was altered in 45 % of the patients following MRI. When adequate sequences are used this modality can direct appropriate therapy while obviating the added expense and morbidity of unnecessary immobilization and follow-up imaging of patients without fracture.     

A screening method for knee trauma

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors performed this study to evaluate whether any one conventional radiographic view is sufficient as a screening method in the detection of acute knee trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors prospectively assessed the efficacy of a single conventional radiograph of the knee in the detection of signs of knee fractures in 214 consecutive adults with acute knee trauma. The evaluated efficacy parameters included specificity, sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value. The percentage reduction in the need for additional conventional radiographs was also calculated. RESULTS: Fifty-three of the 214 patients (24.8%) had a knee fracture. The sensitivity of the single lateral view in the detection of knee fractures was 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 94.3, 100). The lateral view of the traumatized knee was normal in 143 patients (66.8%). The probability of not having a fracture if the lateral view was normal (NPV) was also 100% (95% CI = 97.9, 100). The need for additional radiographs was reduced 67%. CONCLUSION: A single lateral view as a screening tool for knee fractures has a very high sensitivity and NPV. Because more than 65% of the patients had a normal lateral view in this study, there can be a considerable amount of savings in terms of radiology services for these patients.     

Radiography for midfacial trauma: is a single OM 15 degrees radiograph as sensitive as OM 15 degrees and OM 30 degrees combined?

Two previous studies have suggested that a single occipitomental (OM) 15 degrees radiograph may be sufficient for screening for midfacial fractures in the Accident and Emergency (A&E) department, but the study had insufficient power to detect whether some fractures might be missed with only one projection. We undertook to determine whether there is a decreased sensitivity for detecting fractures if only a single OM 15 degrees radiograph is used rather than OM 15 degrees + 30 degrees. 44 cases of major and minor midfacial fractures interspersed randomly with 49 cases of facial injury without fracture were shown to nine A&E clinicians. Initially they were shown only the OM 15 degrees radiograph, then the OM 30 degrees radiograph alone, and then the two radiographs together. They were asked each time to indicate the presence or absence of fracture. The sensitivity for the OM 15 degrees projection alone was 89.4%, and when both radiographs were used it was 90.9% (difference not significant). Given the positive yield of facial radiographs is only 6%, any minimal increase in sensitivity from using two projections is likely to be outweighed by the beneficial reduction in X-ray exposure and costs from using only a single projection. The policy of using a single OM 15 degrees radiograph as a screening tool for midfacial fractures in A&E is a safe one.     

The added value of cross-sectional imaging in the detection of additional radiographically occult fractures in the setting of a Chopart fracture

Purpose

Radiography has a low sensitivity for the detection of fractures related to the talonavicular and calcaneocuboid articulations, also known as Chopart fractures. The purpose of this study is to determine the sensitivity of radiographs for detecting additional foot and ankle fractures related to Chopart fracture using CT or MRI as the reference standard.

Method

We performed an IRB-approved, retrospective review of radiology reports between 2010 and 2014. Inclusion criteria were (1) diagnosis of a Chopart fracture and (2) at least one radiograph and subsequent cross-sectional imaging (CT or MR). CT or MRI was considered the diagnostic reference standard. Results were stratified by the energy of trauma and by type of radiograph performed (weight-bearing (WB) versus non-WB).

Results

One hundred eight patients met the inclusion criteria. The calcaneocuboid articulation was the most commonly involved type of Chopart fracture, seen in 75% of cases (81/108). Chopart fractures were detected on the initial radiographs in 67.6% of cases (73/108). Additional fractures of the ankle and midfoot were diagnosed in 34.2% of cases (37/108), with 56.7% (21/37) of these cases having at least one additional fracture seen on CT or MRI that was not seen on the initial radiographs, with fractures of the midfoot most often missed. In 56.7% (17/30) patients whose radiographs detected Chopart fractures, at least one additional fracture was missed; 30% of them demonstrated intra-articular extension and 56.7% were considered displaced. High-energy trauma was related to higher incidence of additional fractures. There was no significant difference in the sensitivity of radiographs to detect additional fractures between high versus low-energy trauma (p?=?0.3) and WB versus non-WB radiographs (p?=?0.5). Most patients were treated nonoperatively (56.5%, 61/108), with surgical intervention more frequent in patients with a high energy of trauma (51.7% versus 33.3%, p?=?0.05).

Conclusion

In the setting of a Chopart fracture, CT or MRI can add significant value in the detection of additional ankle or midfoot fractures, irrespective of the energy of trauma. Since additional fractures can have important management implications, CT or MRI should be considered as part of the standard workup for all midfoot fractures.

     

Superior mediastinal widening from spine fractures mimicking aortic rupture on chest radiographs

Mediastinal widening on chest radiographs associated with lower cervical and upper thoracic spine fractures can mimic the radiographic findings of aortic rupture. Frontal chest radiographs from 54 patients with traumatic fractures of at least one vertebral body from C6 to T8 were examined for signs suggestive of aortic rupture. These signs included (1) mediastinal width equal to or greater than 8 cm; (2) presence of a left apical cap; (3) a right paratracheal stripe of 5 mm or more; and (4) deviation of the nasogastric tube, when present, to the right of the T4 spinous process. Thirty-seven patients (69%) had radiographic signs suggestive of aortic rupture on the initial anteroposterior chest film. The single patient in this group who actually had an aortic rupture died in the emergency department shortly after admission. The spine fracture could be identified on the initial chest radiograph in 19 (51%) of the 37 patients. These results show that a widened mediastinum on chest radiographs after trauma is not a specific finding of aortic rupture. In these cases, the upper thoracic spine should be examined closely on the initial frontal chest radiograph for evidence of fracture. If a fracture of the upper thoracic spine is identified, an aortic rupture is unlikely in the absence of clinical signs and symptoms supporting this diagnosis.     

The prevalence and significance of missed scapular fractures in blunt chest trauma

Recent concepts regarding surgical management of fractures of the glenoid and scapular neck provide a new imperative to their early recognition. The initial routine supine chest radiograph obtained in patients with major blunt chest trauma provides the earliest opportunity to identify scapular fractures. A retrospective analysis of 100 patients with major blunt chest trauma who were discharged with the diagnosis of scapular fracture was performed to determine (1) the frequency with which the diagnosis of scapular fracture was made on the initial chest radiograph and (2) the prevalence and type of regional injuries that could serve to identify which of these patients are most likely to have sustained scapular fracture(s). The scapular fracture was diagnosed on the initial chest radiograph in only 57 (57%) of 100 patients and, although present, was not recognized in 43 (43%) of 100. In the group in which the fractures were not recognized, the fracture was visible and frankly overlooked in 31 (72%) of 43. The fracture was not included on the examination in eight (19%) of 43; and it was obscured by superimposed structures or artifacts in four (9%) of 43. Ipsilateral regional injuries were present in 88 (88%) of 100. These included multiple upper rib fractures in 40 (40%), clavicular fractures in 17 (17%), acromioclavicular separation in six (6%), and "other" in 26 (26%). "Other" included subcutaneous emphysema, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, and pulmonary contusion. The presence of ipsilateral regional skeletal injuries and soft-tissue injuries after major blunt chest trauma should prompt a diligent search for concomitant scapular fractures.     

Acute paediatric ankle trauma: MRI versus plain radiography

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnosis of acute physeal ankle fractures on plain radiographs using MRI as the gold standard. METHODS: Sixty consecutive children, 29 with a clinical diagnosis of lateral ligament injury and 31 with physeal ankle fractures, were examined using both radiographs and MRI in the acute period. The imaging data were reviewed by three "masked" radiologists. The fracture diagnosis and Slater-Harris classification of radiographs were compared with findings on MRI. RESULTS: Plain radiography produced five of 28 (18%) false negative and 12 of 92 (13%) false positive fracture diagnoses compared with MRI. Six of the 12 false positive fractures were due to a misclassification of lateral ligament disruption as SH1 fractures, Altogether a difference was found in 21% of cases in either the diagnosis or the classification of the fractures according to Salter-Harris. All bone bruises in the distal tibia and fibula and 64% of bone bruises in the talus were seen in association with lateral ligament injuries. Talar bone bruises in association with fractures occurred on the same side as the malleolar fracture; talar bone bruises in association with lateral ligament disruption were seen in different locations. The errors identified on radiographs by MRI did not affect the management of the injury. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of false negative ankle fractures in plain radiographs was small and no complex ankle fractures were missed on radiographs. The total extent of complex fractures was, however, not always obvious on radiographs. In an unselected series of relatively mild ankle injuries, we were unable to show a single case where the treatment or prognosis based on plain radiography should have been significantly altered after having done a routine MRI examination. Plain radiography is still the diagnostic cornerstone of paediatric ankle injuries.     

Magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric elbow fractures

Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation of pediatric elbow trauma with or without a visible fracture on radiography.

Material and Methods: MRI was performed in the acute phase in 25 children with an elbow injury. Nine patients with an elbow effusion only on radiographs and 16 with a fracture or luxation seen on radiographs underwent subsequent MRI. No sedation was used.

Results: MRI revealed eight occult fractures (89%) in seven out of nine patients who had only an effusion on radiographs. Based on MRI findings, septic arthritis was suspected in one patient. Two patients out of five with a supracondylar fracture on the radiograph had a cartilage lesion in the humerus. MRI depicted a 3-mm gap on the articular surface in two patients with a lateral condyle fracture, a more accurate fracture location in two patients than the radiographs, and an additional occult fracture in two patients. MRI showed a fracture not seen on radiographs in two of three patients with prior luxation.

Conclusion: MRI is a sensitive and accurate method in the diagnosis of pediatric elbow injuries, especially when only an effusion is present on radiographs. Occult fractures are more common in pediatric patients with elbow injury than reported earlier.     

Abdominal CT for trauma: an adequate screen for lower thoracic and lumbosacral fractures?

Purpose: To assess the utility of routine trauma abdomen and pelvic CT for the detection of lumbosacral spine fractures. Materials and methods: The radiology records of the University of Arizona Medical Center over a 12-month period were reviewed. Fifty-eight patients with suspected blunt abdominal trauma were studied who had both abdominal CT and radiographs of lumbosacral spine. Twenty-two had one or more fractures of the lumbosacral spine. Thirty-six patients who underwent both imaging studies and had no fracture identified by either modality were selected as controls. The images were reviewed independently by three radiologists who were blinded to the CT and plain radiograph findings. Following the blinded review, all discrepancies were reviewed by the interpreting radiologists who then arrived at a consensus interpretation. A fracture was determined to be present if, by consensus of the reviewers, it was seen on either the CT scan or plain radiograph. Results: Thirty-two fractures were identified; 28 (88 %) were identified on CT, 17(53 %) were seen on plain films. Overall routine abdominal CT is significantly more sensitive in the detection of fracture than plain radiographs. No unstable injuries were missed on plain film while one fracture dislocation was missed on CT. Conclusion: Bone images obtained from routine trauma abdomen and pelvic CT are significantly more sensitive than radiographs in the detection of fractures of the lumbosacral spine. However, CT alone may miss significant injuries.     

Can follow-up radiography for acute scaphoid fracture still be considered a valid investigation?

AIM: To determine whether follow-up radiography is a valid diagnostic investigation in patients with suspected acute scaphoid fractures and normal initial radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty sets of radiographs (initial and follow-up) were independently assessed by four expert observers for the presence or absence of a scaphoid fracture. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), performed in all cases, was used as the gold standard to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the observers' assessment of the follow-up radiograph. In addition, the reliability among observers of the follow-up radiograph was determined by reliability variance analysis. RESULTS: Of the 50 sets of radiographs, 35 patients had a scaphoid fracture and 15 were normal, as established from MRI report. For individual observer's assessment of the follow-up radiograph, sensitivities of 11, 9, 43 and 49%; specificities of 93, 93, 87 and 80%; positive predictive values of 80, 75, 88 and 85%; and negative predictive values of 31, 30, 39 and 40%. A reliability coefficient of more than 60% is needed for a diagnostic test to be considered reliable. Overall, the inter-observer reliability coefficient was 33%, with pair-wise inter-observer coefficients ranging from 18-53%. CONCLUSION: With poor sensitivity, poor negative predictive value and poor reliability, follow-up radiography cannot be considered a valid diagnostic examination for the detection of scaphoid fracture in patients with normal initial radiographs.     

Acute knee trauma: analysis of multidetector computed tomography findings and comparison with conventional radiography

Purpose: To evaluate the multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) findings of acute knee trauma and to compare radiography with MDCT in patients referred to a level 1 trauma center.

Material and Methods: During a 5-year period, a total of 415 MDCT examinations were performed on 409 patients with acute knee trauma to reveal complex fracture anatomy or rule out a fracture. MDCT and primary radiographs were re-evaluated with respect to fracture location and trauma mechanism. Tibial plateau fractures were further analyzed depending on anatomical location: anterior-medial, anterior-lateral, posterior-lateral, and posterior-medial regions. Maximal depression of the tibial articular surface was measured. Findings on the primary knee radiographs were compared with MDCT findings.

Results: Of the 409 patients, 356 (87%) had a knee fracture. A total of 451 fractures were found in all anatomic regions: distal femur (n = 49), proximal tibia (n = 307), patella (n = 23), and proximal fibula (n = 72). Primary radiographs were available in 316 (76%) cases. Of these, 225 (71%) had MDCT in order to reveal the fracture anatomy better, and 91 (29%) had a subsequent MDCT after negative plain radiographs. Overall sensitivity of radiography was 83%, while negative predictive value was 49%. On radiography, tibial plateau articular depression was underestimated in all regions except when the fracture consisted of the whole half of the anterior or posterior plateau. The three main injury mechanisms were traffic accident, a simple fall, and sport. In 49 cases (15%), primary radiographs were suboptimal due to positioning.

Conclusion: In severely injured patients, diagnostically sufficient radiographs are difficult to obtain, and therefore a negative radiograph is not reliable in ruling out a fracture. In these patients, MDCT is a fast and accurate examination and is also recommended in patients with tibial plateau fractures or complex knee injuries in order to evaluate the fracture adequately.     

Missed fractures on emergency room ankle radiographs: An analysis of 433 patients

The purpose of this study was to review fractures and radiographic abnormalities that are detectable, but often overlooked, on a standard ankle radiographic series. We carried out a retrospective review of 556 consecutive ankle radiographic series obtained between June 1, 1995, and May 31, 1996. From this population, 433 complete ankle radiographic series on patients with suspected trauma were selected. The original radiologist's interpretation was compared to a twostep gold standard interpretation, consisting of reinterpretation by a musculoskeletal radiologist with the patient's medical and imaging records at hand, with review of discrepant cases by a consensus panel.Eighteen studies were incorrectly interpreted at the initial reading, yielding an overall error rate of 4.2%. Fifteen of the errors were missed fractures, ankle syndesmotic widening, or incorrect classification of old fractures as acute. The rate for this type of error was 3.5%. The most commonly missed fractures were of the talus (4 patients), followed by fracture of the base of the fifth metatarsal and calcaneal stress fracture (2 cases each); tibiofibular syndesmotic injury was missed in 2 cases.Missed fractures on ankle radiographs most commonly involved bones of the hindfoot, especially the talus. It is important to recognize these uncommon and easily missed fractures, so that a modified search pattern may result in improved accuracy of radiographic interpretation.     

Imaging of cervical spine trauma: are the anteroposterior and odontoid radiographs needed when CT of the entire cervical spine is routine?

Objective: To evaluate the contribution of the anteroposterior (AP) and odontoid radiographs in cervical spine trauma when helical CT of the entire cervical spine is performed in routine screening. Methods: In part 1 of the study, 47 patients with cervical spine fracture (positive) and 92 patients without fracture (negative) were retrospectively assembled into a study population. For each patient, the lateral radiograph and the CT were evaluated for the presence or absence of fracture. The results were compared to the radiology report at the time of injury which was based on the lateral, AP, and odontoid radiographs plus the CT (gold standard). In part 2 of the study, the individual sensitivities of CT and each radiograph were determined by review of the 47 positive patients with the fracture locations known a priori. Results: In all 47 positive patients, the presence of fracture was correctly identified using only the lateral radiograph and the CT. In none of the 92 negative patients was the lateral radiograph plus CT incorrectly interpreted as positive for fracture. The sensitivities for fracture of CT, the lateral radiograph, the AP radiograph, and the odontoid radiograph were 100, 47, 28, and 18 % respectively. Conclusion: The AP and odontoid radiographs did not contribute to the evaluation of suspected cervical spine fracture when the lateral radiograph and helical CT of the entire cervical spine were performed in routine screening.     

Radiologic and clinical spectrum of occipital condyle fractures: retrospective review of 107 consecutive fractures in 95 patients

OBJECTIVE: We proposed to characterize the radiologic spectrum of occipital condyle fractures in a large series of patients and to correlate fracture pathology with neurosurgical treatment and patient outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the findings on conventional radiography, CT, and MR imaging in 95 patients with 107 occipital condyle fractures. We described fracture patterns according to two previously published classification systems. Clinical findings, neurosurgical management, and patient outcome were obtained from the medical records. RESULTS: Inferomedial avulsions (Anderson and Montesano type III) were the most common type of occipital condyle fracture, constituting 80 (75%) of 107 overall fractures. Unilateral occipital condyle fractures were found in 73 (77%) of 95 patients, and 58 patients were treated nonoperatively; occipitocervical fusion was required in nine patients for complex C1-C2 injuries, and six patients died. Bilateral occipital condyle fractures or occipitoatlantoaxial joint injuries were seen in 22 (23%) of 95 patients. Occipitocervical fusion or halo traction for the craniocervical junction was required in 12 patients, all of whom had CT evidence of bilateral occipitoatlantoaxial joint disruption and six of whom showed normal craniocervical relationships on conventional radiographs. Six patients with nondisplaced fractures were treated nonoperatively, and four patients died. Thirty (32%) of 95 patients showed continued disability, whereas 55 (57.5%) of 95 patients had good outcomes at 1 month. Associated cervical spine injuries were present in 29 (31%) of 95 patients. CONCLUSION: Given their associated traumatic brain and cervical spine injuries, occipital condyle fractures are markers of high-energy traumas. That conventional radiographs alone may miss up to half of the patients with acute craniocervical instability has not been well established. Avulsion fracture type and fracture displacement are associated with both injury mechanism and the need for surgical stabilization. In this series, most unilateral occipital condyle fractures were treated nonoperatively, whereas bilateral occipitoatlantoaxial joint injuries with findings of instability usually required surgical stabilization.