Controlled randomised trial of visual biofeedback versus muscle training without a visual display for intractable constipation.

Training to contract the abdominal muscles effectively and to relax the pelvic floor during defecation straining helps some patients with severe constipation. Hitherto all such training has used a visible or audible signal of sphincter muscle activity as a biofeedback method to assist in relaxation. A randomised controlled trial comparing the outcome of muscular training without any biofeedback device with the same training supplemented by an electromyographic (EMG) record visible to the patient is reported. Significant symptomatic improvement was noted and electromyographic measurements confirmed a decrease in pelvic floor muscle activity during defecation straining after treatment in both groups. The outcome was similar in the two treatment groups. Muscular coordination training using personal instruction and encouragement without a visual display is thus a potentially successful treatment suitable for outpatient use by paramedical personnel.     

Effects of biofeedback on obstructive defecation--reconditioning of the defecation reflex?

Twenty two patients with obstructive defecation were recruited for relaxation training by domiciliary self regulatory biofeedback. Each patient served as his or her own control for anorectal and proctographic assessments. Biofeedback training improved the obstructive symptoms of the patients and showed significant change in various parameters related to the obstructive defecation syndrome. As examined by isotope dynamic proctography: the defecation rate (% of evacuation/defecation time) was significantly increased (p < 0.05), the anorectal angles at rest and during attempted defecation were made more obtuse (p < 0.05), and the pelvic floor movements were made more dynamic on voluntary contraction of the anal sphincter (p < 0.03). The external anal sphincter electromyographic voltage recorded during defecation was significantly reduced (p < 0.0005) as was the surface anal plug electromyographic electrode voltage (p < 0.0001), which was associated with a greatly reduced anismus index (p < 0.0001). The rectal sensation was improved (p < 0.05), concomitantly. Biofeedback thus improves the defecation act in patients suffering from inappropriate contraction of the pelvic floor and sphincter musculature. Furthermore, this study has shown that biofeedback objectively influences the defecation reflex leading to an improved quality of higher control of bowel function.     

Biofeedback therapy for dyssynergic defecation

INTRODUCTION Chronic constipation is a common self-reported bowel symptom that affects 2%-30% of people in Western countries and has considerable impact on health expenses and quality of life[1]. Most patients respond either to fiber- fluid supplementatio…     

Outpatient protocol for biofeedback therapy of pelvic floor outlet obstruction

Pelvic floor outlet obstruction is a rare cause of severe constipation. Anal myectomy, subtotal colectomy, and medical therapy have limited success. The purpose of this study was to develop a short outpatient treatment using biofeedback techniques. Nine patients with severe constipation and straining resulting from pelvic floor outlet obstruction underwent complete investigation of the pelvic floor musculature and anal sphincter mechanism. Patients were unable to expel a 60-cc rectal balloon and had nonrelaxing puborectalis on defecography. The treatment protocol utilized anal surface electromyography to document improper straining and retrain pelvic floor muscles to relax during defecation. Sensory retraining with a rectal balloon, behavioral relaxation techniques, and defecation of simulated stool using a 120-cc Metamucil^® (Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, OH) slurry in the rectum allowed re-establishment of normal defecation in all nine patients. Repeat training was required in three patients during follow-up. Treatment of pelvic floor outlet obstruction with outpatient retraining techniques is possible.Read at the meeting of The American College of Gastroenterology, San Francisco, California, October 1990.     

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome in children

SRUS is a rare condition in children, which usually presents with a symptom complex of rectal bleeding, passage of mucus and straining on defecation, tenesmus, perineal and abdominal pain, sensation of incomplete defecation, constipation and rectal prolapse. The underlying etiology of SRUS is not fully understood but it is likely to be secondary to ischemic changes in the rectum associated with paradoxical contraction of pelvic floor and external anal sphincter muscles and rectal prolapse. Conservative measures like high intake of fluids and fibers, laxatives, biofeedback and behavior modification therapy may be beneficial for treatment of constipation. Excision of rectal ulcer and surgery of overt rectal prolapse, however, may be required in refractory cases not responding to conservative treatments. A therapeutic role for botulinum toxin injection into the external anal sphincter for treatment of SRUS associated with constipation and paradoxical contraction of pelvic floor and external anal sphincter muscles in children, may exist.     

Botulinum toxin type-A injection to treat patients with intractable anismus unresponsive to simple biofeedback training

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of botulinum toxin type A injection to the puborectalis and external sphincter muscle in the treatment of patients with anismus unresponsive to simple biofeedback training.METHODS: This retrospective study included 31 patients suffering from anismus who were unresponsive to simple biofeedback training. Diagnosis was made by anorectal manometry, balloon expulsion test, surface electromyography of the pelvic floor muscle, and defecography. Patients were given botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) injection and pelvic floor biofeedback training. Follow-up was conducted before the paper was written. Improvement was evaluated using the chronic constipation scoring system.RESULTS: BTX-A injection combined with pelvic floor biofeedback training achieved success in 24 patients, with 23 maintaining persistent satisfaction during a mean period of 8.4 mo.CONCLUSION: BTX-A injection combined with pelvic floor biofeedback training seems to be successful for intractable anismus.     

Long-Term Study on the Effects of Visual Biofeedback and Muscle Training as a Therapeutic Modality in Pelvic Floor Dyssynergia and Slow-Transit Constipation

PURPOSE: Biofeedback training has been shown as an effective therapeutic measure in patients with pelvic floor dyssynergia, at least in the short term. Long-term effects have received less attention. Moreover, its effects in patients with slow-transit constipation have been scarcely investigated. This study was designed to assess in an objective way the medium- and long-term effects of biofeedback and muscle training in patients with pelvic floor dyssynergia and slow-transit constipation. METHODS: Twenty-four patients (14 with pelvic floor dyssynergia and 10 with slow transit) meeting the Rome II criteria for constipation, and unresponsive to conventional treatments, entered the study. Clinical evaluation and anorectal manometry were performed basally and three months after a cycle of electromyographic biofeedback and muscle training; moreover, a clinical interview was obtained one year after biofeedback. Patients with slow-transit constipation also had colonic transit time reassessed at one year. RESULTS: Clinical variables (abdominal pain, straining, number of evacuations/week, use of laxatives) all significantly improved in both groups at three-month assessment; anorectal manometric variables remained unchanged, apart from a significant decrease of sensation threshold in the pelvic floor dyssynergia group and of the maximum rectal tolerable volume in the slow-transit constipation group. At one-year control, 50 percent of patients with pelvic floor dyssynergia still maintained a beneficial effect from biofeedback, whereas only 20 percent of those complaining of slow-transit constipation did so. Moreover, the latter displayed no improvement in colonic transit time. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, patients with pelvic floor dyssynergia are likely to have continued benefit from biofeedback training in the time course, whereas its effects on slow-transit constipation seems to be maximal in the short-term course.     

Electromyography of the pelvic floor musculature in the assessment of obstructed defecation symptoms

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to use electromyography to examine the behavior of the external sphincter, puborectalis muscle, and pubococcygeus muscle during attempted defecation in patients with symptoms of obstructed defecation and in normal subjects to highlight differences of clinical significance. METHODS: A total of 35 patients (31 females) aged 20 to 80 (mean, 53.7±13.3) years with unprepared bowel who had normal colon transit time and obstructed defecation symptoms and 12 voluntary control subjects (7 females) aged 23 to 68 (mean, 48±11.5) years underwent an electromyography evaluation of the activity of the external sphincter, puborectalis muscle, and pubococcygeus muscle during attempted defecation. The patients were also examined in separate sessions with defecography and anal manometry. RESULTS: During attempted defecation, puborectalis muscle and external sphincter always reacted in the same manner. When evaluated with pubococcygeus muscle, three main patterns of activity were observed either in patients or in controls: 1) coordinated activation pattern; 2) coordinated inhibition pattern; and 3) uncoordinated or equivocal pattern: activation of pubococcygeus muscle with inhibition of puborectalis muscle/external sphincter, activation followed by inhibition of the three muscles, and activation followed by inhibition of pubococcygeus muscle and no change in the others. We never observed activation of puborectalis muscle/external sphincter concomitant with inhibition of pubococcygeus muscle. The inhibitory coordinated pattern occurred significantly (P = 0.01) more frequently in controls than in patients. These subjects also presented a significantly (P = 0.01) lower frequency of pubococcygeus muscle inhibition. CONCLUSIONS: Either activation or inhibition appears as a physiological behavior, possibly adopted in different circumstances, of the pelvic floor muscles during attempted defecation. The higher prevalence of coordinated inhibitory patterns in normal subjects and the lower frequency of pubococcygeus muscle inhibition in patients with symptoms of obstructed defecation, however, suggests that a loss of inhibition capacity progressing from pubococcygeus muscle to puborectalis muscle/external sphincter muscles could determine the insurgence of obstructed defecation symptoms in some subjects, who should therefore benefit from biofeedback retraining aimed at reacquisition of the inhibition capacity of all muscles of the pelvic floor during defecation.Deceased.Supported by a grant (60%) from the Ministry of Scientific and Technological Research, Italy.Presented at the Joint Meeting of the Israel Society of Colon and Rectal Surgery and the Mediterranean Society of Coloproctology, Nazareth, Israel, September 24 to 27, 2000.     

Does water-perfused catheter overdiagnose anismus compared to balloon probe?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the manometric assessment of straining effort as if to defecate and rectoanal inhibitory reflex obtained with a rectosphincteric balloon probe and with a water-perfused catheter in the same subject. METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers underwent two manometric assessments of anal sphincter function and electromyographic (EMG) surface recordings. one with a rectosphincteric balloon and one with a water-perfused catheter, 7 days apart in random order. RESULTS: Increased EMG activity in the external anal sphincter in the midst of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex (P < 0.001) and during straining for defecation (P < 0.001) was more frequently observed with the perfused system than with the balloon probe. There was a discrepancy between the EMG activity of the external anal sphincter and the anal pressures during straining recorded with the perfused system. Duration of the reflex elicited by rectal distension with 10 and 20 ml of air was significantly greater with the rectosphincteric balloon than with the perfused catheter (P = 0.02 and P = 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSION: Water instilled in the anal canal by the perfused system induces artifacts in EMG recording and active anal contractions. These artifacts and induced contractions could lead to an erroneous diagnosis of anismus, particularly if pelvic floor EMG is only taken into account for the diagnosis of anismus.     

This Month in Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the manometric assessment of straining effort as if to defecate and rectoanal inhibitory reflex obtained with a rectosphincteric balloon probe and with a waterperfused catheter in the same subject. Methods: Twelve healthy volunteers underwent two manometric assessments of anal sphincter function and electromyographic (EMG) surface recordings, one with a rectosphincteric balloon and one with a water-perfused catheter, 7 days apart in random order. Results: Increased EMG activity in the external anal sphincter in the midst of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex ( P < 0.001) and during straining for defecation ( P < 0.001) was more frequently observed with the perfused system than with the balloon probe. There was a discrepancy between the EMG activity of the external anal sphincter and the anal pressures during straining recorded with the perfused system. Duration of the reflex elicited by rectal distension with 10 and 20 ml of air was significantly greater with the rectosphincteric balloon than with the perfused catheter ( P = 0.02 and P = 0.05, respectively). Conclusion: Water instilled in the anal canal by the perfused system induces artifacts in EMG recording and active anal contractions. These artifacts and induced contractions could lead to an erroneous diagnosis of anismus, particularly if pelvic floor EMG is only taken into account for the diagnosis of anismus.     

The role of biofeedback in the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders

Biofeedback is a form of treatment that has no adverse effects and can be provided by physician extenders. The therapy relies on patients' ability to learn how to influence their bodily functions through dedicated machinery and teaching. This Review provides a comprehensive overview of all potential therapeutic applications of biofeedback for functional constipation, fecal incontinence, functional anorectal pain, IBS, functional dyspepsia, and aerophagia. Practical clinical applications of biofeedback therapy supported by randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) are limited to fecal incontinence and dyssynergic defecation. For fecal incontinence, RCTs suggest that biofeedback combining strength training and sensory discrimination training is effective in approximately 75% of patients and is more effective than placebo. However, verbal feedback provided by a therapist during extended digital examination may be equally effective, and children whose fecal incontinence is associated with constipation plus fecal impaction do no better with biofeedback than medical management. For dyssynergic defecation, RCTs show that biofeedback combining pelvic floor muscle relaxation training, practice in defecating a water-filled balloon, and instruction in effective straining is effective in approximately 70% of patients who have failed to respond to laxative treatment. For both incontinence and dyssynergic defecation, the benefits of biofeedback last at least 12 months.     

A combined electromyographic and cineradiologic investigation in patients with defecation disorders

Records from 20 patients on whom defecography and electromyography were performed simultaneously because of defecation disorders were analyzed. According to the electromyographic investigation, the patients could be divided into three main groups: 1) normal sphincter reaction; 2) paradoxical sphincter reaction; and 3) combined reaction. Group A was characterized by a marked reduction of muscular activity during emptying and a pronounced closing reflex after emptying. This was followed by return of normal tonic activity. Patients in group B had no relaxation of the sphincters during emptying but a pronounced increased activity in the external sphincter and the puborectalis muscle. They also had severe emptying difficulties at defecography. No closing reflex was seen. In group C the electrical activity in the sphincters increased during moderate straining and when emptying was complete a clear closing reflex was seen. In this study, a dynamic visualization of the defecation together with a registration of electromyographic activity in the striated anal sphincters was performed. It was shown that patients with paradoxical sphincter reaction were lacking a closing reflex after emptying was complete. This has not been reported previously and is important evidence for the paradoxical defecation pattern. It was also shown that the patients with rectoceles had paradoxical sphincter reaction.     

Is anorectal endosonography valuable in dyschesia?

AIMS: Dyschesia can be provoked by inappropriate defecation movements. The aim of this prospective study was to demonstrate dysfunction of the anal sphincter and/or the musculus (m.) puborectalis in patients with dyschesia using anorectal endosonography. METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients with a medical history of dyschesia and a control group of 20 healthy subjects underwent linear anorectal endosonography (Toshiba models IUV 5060 and PVL-625 RT). In both groups, the dimensions of the anal sphincter and the m. puborectalis were measured at rest, and during voluntary squeezing and straining. Statistical analysis was performed within and between the two groups. RESULTS: The anal sphincter became paradoxically shorter and/or thicker during straining (versus the resting state) in 85% of patients but in only 35% of control subjects. Changes in sphincter length were statistically significantly different (p<0.01, chi(2) test) in patients compared with control subjects. The m. puborectalis became paradoxically shorter and/or thicker during straining in 80% of patients but in only 30% of controls. Both the changes in length and thickness of the m. puborectalis were significantly different (p<0.01, chi(2) test) in patients versus control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Linear anorectal endosonography demonstrated incomplete or even absent relaxation of the anal sphincter and the m. puborectalis during a defecation movement in the majority of our patients with dyschesia. This study highlights the value of this elegant ultrasonographic technique in the diagnosis of "pelvic floor dyssynergia" or "anismus".     

Randomized,Controlled Trial Shows Biofeedback to be Superior to Alternative Treatments for Patients with Pelvic Floor Dyssynergia-Type Constipation

Purpose This study was designed to determine whether biofeedback is more effective than diazepam or placebo in a randomized, controlled trial for patients with pelvic floor dyssynergia-type constipation, and whether instrumented biofeedback is necessary for successful training. Methods A total of 117 patients participated in a four-week run-in (education and medical management). The 84 who remained constipated were randomized to biofeedback (n=30), diazepam (n=30), or placebo (n=24). All patients were trained to do pelvic floor muscle exercises to correct pelvic floor dyssynergia during six biweekly one-hour sessions, but only biofeedback patients received electromyography feedback. All other patients received pills one to two hours before attempting defecation. Diary data on cathartic use, straining, incomplete bowel movements, Bristol stool scores, and compliance with homework were reviewed biweekly. Results Before treatment, the groups did not differ on demographic (average age, 50 years; 85 percent females), physiologic or psychologic characteristics, severity of constipation, or expectation of benefit. Biofeedback was superior to diazepam by intention-to-treat analysis (70 vs. 23 percent reported adequate relief of constipation 3 months after treatment, chi-squared=13.1, P<0.001), and also superior to placebo (38 percent successful, chi-squared=5.7, P=0.017). Biofeedback patients had significantly more unassisted bowel movements at follow-up compared with placebo (P=0.005), with a trend favoring biofeedback over diazepam (P=0.067). Biofeedback patients reduced pelvic floor electromyography during straining significantly more than diazepam patients (P<0.001). Conclusions This investigation provides definitive support for the efficacy of biofeedback for pelvic floor dyssynergia and shows that instrumented biofeedback is essential to successful treatment. Support by NIDDK - Grant #R01DK57048, General Clinical Research Center, UNC at Chapel Hill, grant #RR00046, Sandhill? Scientific, Incorporated, Jansen Pharmaceuticals, Milan Pharmaceuticals. Presented at meeting of The American College of Gastroenterology, Honolulu, Hawaii, October 30 to November 2, 2005.     

The spastic pelvic floor syndrome

In 12 patients with constipation, it was detected by defecography that, during straining, the anorectal angle did not increase, but remained at 90 degrees. These patients were unable to excrete barium. since the anorectal angle is a measure of activity of the pelvic floor musculature, a dysfunction of this muscle was suspected. In order to determine whether this abnormality represented a true functional disorder or just a voluntary contraction of the pelvic floor muscles due to embarrassment, we performed electromyographic, manometric, and transit time studies in these patients. The electromyographic studies confirmed the persistent contraction during defecation straining. Both manometry and electromyography revealed normal muscle function at rest and during squeezing. Colonic transit time studies demonstrated rectal retention in nine of 12 patients, indicating outlet obstruction. Persistent contraction of the pelvic floor muscles, for which we propose the name “spastic pelvic floor syndrome,” represents a functional disorder of normal pelvic floor muscles, causing a functional outlet obstruction. Read at the meeting of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, San Diego, California, May 5 to 10, 1985.     

Behavioral medicine treatment in chronic constipation with paradoxical anal sphincter contraction

Nine women and five children with severe chronic constipation received behavioral medicine therapy. Before treatment, all patients had a paradoxical contraction of the external anal sphincter at defecation attempts as demonstrated with electromyography and/or anorectal manometry. An electromyographic biofeedback device connected to an anal probe was used for the training that was performed on a regular toilet seat during five 1-hour sessions. Thirteen of the patients improved considerably and could learn to defecate spontaneously, and the use of laxatives ceased or diminished. Simultaneously with improvement, the paradoxical anal contraction disappeared. The results remained after 6 months, although two of the patients had received booster sessions of biofeedback training during follow-up.This study was supported financially by the Örebro County Research Committee.     

Paradoxical sphincter reaction is influenced by rectal filling volume

PURPOSE: Paradoxical sphincter reaction is frequently found in constipated patients but sometimes also in incontinent patients and in asymptomatic subjects. Its significance in defecation disorders has, therefore, been debated. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether paradoxical sphincter reaction is influenced by rectal filling volume. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with defecation disorders and paradoxical sphincter reaction shown by electromyography were reinvestigated with an extended electromyographic investigation while in the lying position and while in the sitting position, with 50-ml, 100-ml, and 150-ml water-filled rectal balloons. RESULTS: All 18 patients showing paradoxical sphincter reaction in the first investigation also showed the reaction at the second investigation in the lying position with a 0-ml volume of rectal contents. In the sitting position, with a volume of 150 ml of rectal contents, the increase in electromyographic activity disappeared in seven patients (39 percent) and no longer showed paradoxical sphincter reaction. Electromyography showed decreased activity in one patient and unchanged activity in six patients during straining. A closing reflex was seen after completed straining in all of these seven patients. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that paradoxical sphincter reaction diagnosed by electromyography is influenced by the rectal filling volume and might diminish when the rectum is filled with contents. The conventional electrophysiologic technique in the diagnosis of paradoxical sphincter reaction might, therefore, overdiagnose this condition.     

Magnetic resonance imaging of anatomic and dynamic defects of the pelvic floor in defecatory disorders

OBJECTIVE: Endoanal ultrasound identifies anal sphincter anatomy, and evacuation proctography visualizes pelvic floor motion during simulated defecation. These complementary techniques can evaluate obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence. Our aim was to develop a single, nonionizing, minimally invasive modality to image global pelvic floor anatomy and motion. METHODS: We studied six patients with fecal incontinence and seven patients with obstructed defecation. The anal sphincters were imaged with an endoanal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) coil and endoanal ultrasound (five patients). MR fluoroscopy acquired images every 1.4-2 s, using a modified real-time, T2-weighted, single-shot, fast-spin echo sequence, recording motion as patients squeezed pelvic floor muscles and expelled ultrasound gel; no contrast was added to other pelvic organs. Six patients also had scintigraphic defecography. RESULTS: Endoanal ultrasound and MRI were comparable for imaging defects of the internal and external sphincters. Only MRI revealed puborectalis and/or external sphincter atrophy; four of these patients had fecal incontinence. MR fluoroscopy recorded pelvic floor contraction during squeeze and recorded relaxation during simulated defecation. Corresponding comparisons for angle change and perineal descent during defecation were not significant; only MRI, but not scintigraphy, identified excessive perineal descent in two patients. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic MRI is a promising single, comprehensive, nonradioactive modality to measure structural and functional pelvic floor disturbances in defecatory disorders. This method may provide insights into mechanisms of normal and disordered pelvic floor function in health and disease.     

Manometric and radiologic investigations and biofeedback treatment of chronic idiopathic anal pain

In 12 patients suffering from chronic idiopathic anal pain, the rectosphincteric function was studied using manometric and x-ray techniques. The results of manometric investigations were compared with those obtained in 12 healthy volunteers. In all patients, the resting pressure in the anal canal was significantly higher than in control subjects. In 10 patients, defecography revealed abnormalities of the pelvic muscles. We treated the patients by using biofeedback techniques, consisting of voluntary modifications of the state of contraction of the external sphincter. In all cases, pain disappeared after a mean of eight biofeedback training sessions. When noxious manifestations had disappeared, manometry showed a significant decrease in the anal canal resting pressure. Our results indicate 1) that chronic idiopathic anal pain is associated with abnormal anorectal manometric profiles, probably resulting from a dysfunctioning of the striated external anal sphincter, and 2) that biofeedback training is an effective treatment for chronic idiopathic anal pain.This work was supported by INSERM Grant No. 89/3h58/BCR/ CR/BD and by Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale.