Radiotherapy versus chemotherapy plus radiotherapy in surgically treated IIIA N2 non-small-cell lung cancer

Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. Phase II trials utilizing preoperative chemotherapy in selected patients have achieved complete resection rates of 50%-70% with 3-5 year failure-free survival rates of 15%-33%. Between October 1992 and November 1994, 57 adults (50 of whom were evaluable) with surgically staged IIIA NSCLC and pathologically documented ipsilateral mediastinal nodal involvement (N2) were enrolled in a Cancer and Leukemia Group B randomized trial. Preoperative therapy was thought to be critical to facilitating surgical resectability. For patients randomized to the radiotherapy/surgery/radiotherapy (RSR) arm (n = 24), treatment consisted of preoperative radiation therapy (RT) at 40 Gy, surgery, and then additional RT at 14-20 Gy. For patients randomized to the chemotherapy/surgery/chemotherapy/radiotherapy (CSCR) arm (n = 26), treatment consisted of 2 cycles of cisplatin/etoposide with filgrastim support (PE) followed by surgery, 2 more cycles of PE, then RT 54-60 Gy. The total dose of RT on either arm was 54 Gy if completely resected or 60 Gy if incompletely resected or unresected. Clinical characteristics were well balanced between the two arms. Thoracotomy was performed in 42 patients (84%), 28 (67%) of whom had complete resection. The median failure-free and overall survival rates were 12 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9-23 months) and 23 months (95% CI, 19 months-infinity) for the RSR arm and 11 months (95% CI, 5-20 months) and 18 months (95% CI, 12-32 months) for the CSCR arm. The rates of overall and complete surgical resection, downstaging of nodal involvement, and failure-free (P = 0.92) and overall survival (P = 0.41) did not differ between the two treatment arms. Moreover, in this trial, the chemotherapy regimen was sufficiently toxic to have had a lower completion rate of prescribed therapy in the CSCR arm than in the RSR arm.     

Functional polymorphisms of the microsomal epoxide hydrolase gene: a reappraisal on a early-onset lung cancer patients series

As concomitant chemoradiotherapy for stage III NSCLC is associated with survival advantage in comparison to a sequential approach, we conducted a phase III randomised study aiming to determine the best sequence and safety of chemotherapy (CT) and chemoradiotherapy (CT-RT), using a regimen with cisplatin (CDDP), gemcitabine (GEM) and vinorelbine (VNR). Unresectable stage III NSCLC patients received CDDP (60 mg/m(2)), GEM (1g/m(2), days 1 and 8) and VNR (25mg/m(2), days 1 and 8) with reduced dosage of GEM and VNR during radiotherapy (66Gy). Two cycles of CT with radiotherapy followed by two further cycles of CT alone were administered in arm A or the reverse sequence in arm B. The study was prematurely closed for poor accrual due to administrative problems. Forty-nine eligible patients were randomised. Response rates and median survival times were, respectively 57% (95% CI: 36-78%) and 17 months (95% CI: 9.3-24.6 months) in arm A and 79% (95% CI: 64-94%) and 23.9 months (95% CI: 13.3-34.5 months) in arm B (p>0.05). Chemotherapy dose-intensity was significantly reduced in arm A. Grade 3-4 oesophagitis occurred in 5 patients. One case of grade 5 radiation pneumonitis was observed. In conclusion, chemoradiotherapy with CDDP, GEM and VNR appears feasible as initial treatment or after induction chemotherapy. Consolidation chemoradiotherapy seems less toxic with a better observed response rates and survival although no valid conclusion can be drawn from the comparison of both arms.     

Alternating chemotherapy and accelerated split-course irradiation in locally advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with locally advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), which is usually unresectable, is very poor, and patient survival rarely reaches 1 year. However, prolonged survival correlated with objective responses has been observed among patients with intrathoracic disease treated with a combination of cytotoxic drugs and local irradiation despite the lack of consensus regarding the schedule of such combined therapy. From October 1989 to November 1993, a Phase II study was conducted to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of alternating chemotherapy and accelerated split-course radiotherapy in the treatment of patients with locally advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Sixty-three consecutive patients with unresectable Stage III NSCLC entered this study. The treatment was composed of 3 cycles of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy at 4-week intervals. Chemotherapy with cisplatin (30 mg/m2/day) and etoposide (100 mg/m2/day) was delivered intravenously on Days 1, 2, and 3, followed by radiotherapy on Days 4-8. A course of radiotherapy consisted of 1.5 gray (Gy) per fraction twice a day (3 Gy per day) for 5 consecutive days, for a total dose of 15 Gy. Response was assessed after 3 courses, for a total irradiation dose of 45 Gy. In cases of objective antitumoral response with operable tumor, surgery was performed. A fourth course of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, for a total dose up to 60 Gy in 12 weeks, was administered to all patients. Two additional courses of chemotherapy were given, for a total of six. RESULTS: Of the 63 patients, 62 were evaluable for response. Six had a complete remission and 36 a partial response, resulting in an overall response rate of 67.7%. Nine patients underwent surgery (pneumonectomy for seven patients and lobectomy for two patients), and the complete disappearance of any residual tumor was documented histologically in four. Of the 290 chemotherapy courses delivered, there were 31 of Grade 3-4 toxicity, mainly leukopenia and vomiting. The median times of freedom from disease progression and overall survival were 8 months (confidence interval [CI], 7-9.5) and 14 months (CI, 10-22), respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates of the 62 patients were 54%, 35%, and 21%, respectively. Patients who responded had a significantly longer median survival (16 months) than nonresponders (7 months) (P = 0.02). However, there was no difference in the survival of resected and nonresected patients. CONCLUSIONS: This treatment schedule resulted in a high response rate with prolonged survival. However, the toxicity of this approach was not negligible, even though it did not preclude this strategy. This combined modality must be compared with other combinations of alternating or sequential chemoradiotherapy.     

Short-course versus split-course radiotherapy in metastatic spinal cord compression: results of a phase III, randomized, multicenter trial.

PURPOSE: Hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) is often used in the treatment of metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). This randomized trial was planned to assess the clinical outcome and toxicity of two different hypofractionated RT regimens in MSCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred patients with MSCC were randomly assigned to a short-course RT (8 Gy x 2 days) or to a split-course RT (5 Gy x 3; 3 Gy x 5). Only patients with a short life expectancy entered the protocol. Median follow-up was 33 months (range, 4 to 61 months). RESULTS: A total of 276 (92%) patients were assessable; 142 (51%) treated with the short-course and 134 (49%) treated with the split-course RT regimen. There was no significant difference in response, duration of response, survival, or toxicity found between the two arms. When short- versus split-course regimens were compared, after RT 56% and 59% patients had back pain relief, 68% and 71% were able to walk, and 90% and 89% had good bladder function, respectively. Median survival was 4 months and median duration of improvement was 3.5 months for both arms. Toxicity was equally distributed between the two arms: grade 3 esophagitis or pharyngitis was registered in four patients (1.5%), grade 3 diarrhea occurred in four patients (1.5%), and grade 3 vomiting or nausea occurred in 10 patients (6%). Late toxicity was never recorded. CONCLUSION: Both hypofractionated RT schedules adopted were effective and had acceptable toxicity. However, considering the advantages of the short-course regimen in terms of patient convenience and machine time, it could become the RT regimen of choice in the clinical practice for MSCC patients.     

Randomized trial of radiation therapy versus concomitant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for advanced-stage oropharynx carcinoma

BACKGROUND: We designed a randomized clinical trial to test whether the addition of three cycles of chemotherapy during standard radiation therapy would improve disease-free survival in patients with stages III and IV (i.e., advanced oropharynx carcinoma). METHODS: A total of 226 patients have been entered in a phase III multicenter, randomized trial comparing radiotherapy alone (arm A) with radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy (arm B). Radiotherapy was identical in the two arms, delivering, with conventional fractionation, 70 Gy in 35 fractions. In arm B, patients received during the period of radiotherapy three cycles of a 4-day regimen containing carboplatin (70 mg/m(2) per day) and 5-fluorouracil (600 mg/m(2) per day) by continuous infusion. The two arms were equally balanced with regard to age, sex, stage, performance status, histology, and primary tumor site. RESULTS: Radiotherapy compliance was similar in the two arms with respect to total dose, treatment duration, and treatment interruption. The rate of grades 3 and 4 mucositis was statistically significantly higher in arm B (71%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 54%-85%) than in arm A (39%; 95% CI = 29%-56%). Skin toxicity was not different between the two arms. Hematologic toxicity was higher in arm B as measured by neutrophil count and hemoglobin level. Three-year overall actuarial survival and disease-free survival rates were, respectively, 51% (95% CI = 39%-68%) versus 31% (95% CI = 18%-49%) and 42% (95% CI = 30%-57%) versus 20% (95% CI = 10%-33%) for patients treated with combined modality versus radiation therapy alone (P =.02 and.04, respectively). The locoregional control rate was improved in arm B (66%; 95% CI = 51%-78%) versus arm A (42%; 95% CI = 31%-56%). CONCLUSION: The statistically significant improvement in overall survival that was obtained supports the use of concomitant chemotherapy as an adjunct to radiotherapy in the management of carcinoma of the oropharynx.     

Long-term results of conventional radiotherapy versus accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy versus concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy in locoregionally advanced carcinoma of the oropharynx

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: To compare conventional fractionation (CF) radiation therapy (RT), arm A, versus a split-course accelerated hyperfractionated schedule (S-AHF), arm B, versus CFRT plus concomitant chemotherapy (CT), arm C, in terms of five-year survival and toxicity for squamous cell tumors of the oropharynx. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: Between January 1993 and June 1998, 192 previously untreated patients with stage III and IV oropharyngeal carcinoma (excluding T1N1 and T2N1) were enrolled in a multicenter randomized phase III trial (ORO 93-01). In arms A and C, 66 to 70 Gy in 33 to 35 fractions was administered five days a week for six and a half to seven weeks. In arm B, the dose delivered was 64 to 67.2 Gy in two fractions of 1.6 Gy every day, five days a week, with a planned two-week split at 38.4 Gy. In arm C the CT regimen consisted of three cycles of carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CBDCA 75 mg/m2 on days 1 to 4 and 5-FU 1000 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1 to 4 every 28 days). RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found in five-year overall survival (P = 0.39): 21% for arm A, 21% for arm B, and 40% for arm C. Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in terms of five-year relapse-free survival: 15% for arm A, 17% for arm B, and 36% for arm C. There was a slight trend towards better five-year locoregional control (P = 0.07) for the combined arm: patients without locoregional relapse were 48% in arm C, 21% in arm A and 18% in arm B. Locoregional control was significantly better when arm C was compared with arms A and B combined (P = 0.02; arm A+B 20%; arm C 48%). Distant metastases were fairly balanced in the three arms (A: 14; B: 9; C: 11), with a tendency towards more frequent isolated distant metastasis development in arm C (8 of 11 [72%] versus 7 of 23 [30%] in arms A+B). Five-year second-tumor-free survival was 85%. The 13 second tumors were equally distributed and were mainly correlated with tobacco and alcohol consumption (five lung, two esophagus, two oral cavity, one larynx, one pancreas, one hepatocarcinoma, one myeloma). Arm C showed slightly more G3+ late side effects involving subcutaneous tissues and mucosa, although significant late sequelae were relatively uncommon and the mucosal side effects were mostly transient. The occurrence of persistent G3 xerostomia was comparable in the three treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained with the combination of CT and RT compared with RT alone did not reach statistical significance, but combined treatment almost doubled the five-year overall survival, relapse-free survival and locoregional control rate. Patients with advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the oropharynx who are medically suitable for the combined approach should be treated with a combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The occurrence of second tumors is relatively common in these patients and may contribute substantially to the causes of death.     

Combination of 5-FU cisplatinum and hypofractionated irradiation followed by split-course radiotherapy in 47 patients with unresectable non small cell lung cancer.

Forty-seven patients with unresectable non small cell lung carcinoma, 15 stage IIIA, 31 stage IIIB, 1 stage IV (cervical lymphadenopathy) were treated with a combination of three courses of chemotherapy and hypofractionated irradiation followed after 3 weeks by split course radiotherapy. Each course was repeated every 3 weeks with the following sequence: Cisplatinum (CDDP) (20 mg/m2) was given in a 20-min infusion, followed by a 2-h infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (400 mg/m2) on days 1, 2, 5 and 6. Radiation with a dose of 3 Gy on the target volume was given on days 3 and 4--in one fraction for the former 27 patients, in 2 fractions of 1.5 Gy for the latter 20 patients with a 6-h interval--after a 2-h infusion of 5-FU (400 mg/m2). The results remain disappointing: the objective response rate was 53%, the median survival was 10 months for the series, and the one-year survival 47%. The median survival was 14 months for IIIA, 10 months for IIIB and IV. Regarding the therapeutic regimen there seems to be less morbidity with 2 fractions per day for which the median survival is nearly the same at 10 months (1 fraction/day) versus 12 months (2 fractions/day).     

Irinotecan and cisplatin with concurrent split-course radiotherapy in locally advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer: a multiinstitutional phase 2 study

BACKGROUND: The purpose was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan and cisplatin with concurrent split-course thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in locally advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer. METHODS: Fifty patients fulfilling the following eligibility criteria were enrolled: chemotherapy-naive, good performance status (PS, 0-2), age <75, stage III, and adequate organ function. The patients received irinotecan 60 mg/m(2) intravenously on Days 1, 8, and 15, and cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) intravenously on Day 1 in the first group. The doses were reduced to 50 and 60 mg/m(2), respectively, in the second group. Two cycles of chemotherapy were repeated every 4 weeks. Split-course thoracic radiotherapy of 2 Gy/day commenced on Day 2 of each chemotherapy cycle, with 28 and 32 Gy administered in the first and second cycles, respectively. RESULTS: Fifty patients were eligible and 48 (16 in the first, 32 in the second group) patients were assessable for response, toxicity, and survival. The overall response was 83% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70%-93%). Grade 4 leukopenia, neutropenia, grade 3 or 4 diarrhea, pneumonitis, esophagitis, and fatigue occurred in 21%, 48%, 19%, 10%, and 19%, respectively. The median time to progression was 8.2 months. The median overall survival time and the 2- and 5-year survival rates were 20.1 months, 47.1%, and 17.1%, respectively. In subgroup analysis, grade 4 neutropenia, grade 3 or 4 diarrhea, the overall response, and the median survival times of the first/second groups were 63%/41%, 19%/19%, 75%/88%, and 13.1/33.4 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This combined modality of irinotecan and cisplatin with concurrent TRT is active and further investigations are warranted at the second group dose level.     

A prospective, randomised study to compare two palliative radiotherapy schedules for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

A prospective randomised study compared two palliative radiotherapy schedules for inoperable symptomatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). After stratification, 100 patients were randomly assigned to 20 Gy/5 fractions (fr)/5 days (arm A) or 16 Gy/2 fr/day 1 and 8 (arm B). There were 90 men and 10 women aged 47-81 years (mean 66), performance status 1-4 (median 2). The major clinical characteristics and incidence and degree of initial disease-related symptoms were similar in both groups. Treatment effects were assessed using patient's chart, doctor's scoring of symptomatic change and chest X-ray. Study end points included degree and duration of symptomatic relief, treatment side effects, objective response rates and overall survival. A total of 55 patients were assigned to arm A and 45 to arm B. In all, 98 patients received assigned treatment, whereas two patients died before its termination. Treatment tolerance was good and did not differ between study arms. No significant differences between study arms were observed in the degree of relief of all analysed symptoms. Overall survival time differed significantly in favour of arm B (median 8.0 vs 5.3 months; P=0.016). Both irradiation schedules provided comparable, effective palliation of tumour-related symptoms. The improved overall survival and treatment convenience of 2-fraction schedule suggest its usefulness in the routine management of symptomatic inoperable NSCLC.     

局限期小细胞肺癌胸部放疗靶区的前瞻性随机对照研究

目的 通过开展前瞻性随机对照研究探讨局限期小细胞肺癌(SCLC)胸部不同放疗靶区对预后的影响。方法 选取2002-2017年中山大学肿瘤医院及浙江省肿瘤医院收治的接受2程EP方案诱导化疗后无疾病进展的309例局限期SCLC患者。随机分为照射化疗后残留肿瘤组(159例)和照射化疗前原发病灶组(150例)。2个组患者均采用累及野照射纵隔阳性淋巴结的完整结区。胸部放疗采用45 Gy分30次3周完成,2 次/d,与第3程EP方案化疗同步进行。共化疗4-6程。放化疗后疗效评价完全缓解及部分缓解的患者接受全脑预防性放疗25 Gy分10次2周完成或30 Gy分15次3周完成。采用Kaplan-Meier法分析生存数据。结果 照射化疗后残留肿瘤组和化疗前原发病灶组1、2、5年局部控制率分别为79.4%、61.5%、60.1%和79.8%、66.5%、57.3%(P=0.73)。化疗后残留肿瘤组和化疗前原发病灶组中位生存时间分别为22.1个月(95%CI:18.2~26.0)和26.9个月(95%CI:23.5~30.3),1、3、5、7年总生存率分别为81.1%、31.6%、23.9%、 22.2%和85.3%、36.6%、26.1%、20.0%(P=0.51)。化疗后残留肿瘤组和化疗前原发病灶组2-3级急性放射性食管炎发生率分别为32.9%和43.2%(P=0.01),2-3级肺纤维化发生率分别为2.0%和10.9%(P=0.01)。结论 对于诱导化疗后的局限期SCLC,胸部放疗可仅照射化疗后残留原发灶,纵隔淋巴结引流区可常规采用累及野放疗。     

Overall survival after concurrent cisplatin-radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

This phase III randomized study compared concurrent cisplatin-radiotherapy (CRT) versus radiotherapy (RT) alone in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. A total of 350 patients were randomly assigned to receive external RT alone or concurrently with cisplatin at a dosage of 40 mg/m(2) weekly. The primary endpoint was overall survival, and the median follow-up was 5.5 years. The 5-year overall survival was 58.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 50.9% to 66.2%) for the RT arm and 70.3% (95% CI = 63.4% to 77.3%) for the CRT arm. In Cox regression analysis adjusted for T stage, age, and overall stage, the difference in overall survival was statistically significantly in favor of concurrent CRT (P = .049, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.71 [95% CI = 0.5 to 1.0]). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that there was no difference between overall survival in the arms for T1/T2 stage (P = .74, HR = 0.93 [95% CI = 0.59 to 1.4]), whereas there was a difference between the arms for T3/T4 stage (P = .013, HR = 0.51 [95% CI = 0.3 to 0.88]), favoring the CRT arm. The regimen of weekly concurrent CRT is a promising standard treatment strategy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.     

A multicenter phase III trial comparing irinotecan-gemcitabine (IG) with gemcitabine (G) monotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer

Our purpose was to determine the response rate and median and overall survival of gemcitabine as monotherapy versus gemcitabine plus irinotecan in advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma who were chemotherapy and radiotherapy naive were enrolled. Patients were centrally randomised at a one-to-one ratio to receive either gemcitabine monotherapy (900 mg m(-2) on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks (arm G), or gemcitabine (days 1 and 8) plus irinotecan (300 mg m(-2) on day 8) (arm IG), repeated every 3 weeks. The total number of cycles administered was 255 in the IG arm and 245 in the G arm; the median number of cycles was 3. In all, 145 patients (71 in arm IG and 74 in arm G) were enrolled; 60 and 70 patients from arms IG and G, respectively, were evaluable. A complete clinical response was achieved in three (4.3%) arm G patients; nine (15%) patients in arm IG and four (5.7%) in arm G achieved a partial response. The overall response rate was: arm IG 15% and arm G 10% (95% CI 5.96-24.04 and 95% CI 2.97-17.03, respectively; P=0.387). The median time to tumour progression was 2.8 months and 2.9 months and median survival time was 6.4 and 6.5 months for the IG and G arms, respectively. One-year survival was 24.3% for the IG arm and 21.8% for the G arm. No statistically significant difference was observed comparing gemcitabine monotherapy versus gemcitabine plus irinotecan in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer, with respect to overall and 1-year survival.     

A randomized study comparing two different schedules of administration of cisplatin in combination with gemcitabine in advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND: This randomized trial was designed to investigate the feasibility, toxicity, and activity of two different schedules of gemcitabine plus cisplatin in previously untreated patients with advanced (International Union Against Cancer (UICC) Stage IIIB-IV) nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). METHODS: From February 1997 to September 1998, 82 patients with advanced NSCLC were entered onto the study and were randomized to gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on Days 1, 8, and 15 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on Day 2 (arm A) or Day 15 (arm B) every 28 days. RESULTS: All the patients were assessable for toxicity (arm A/arm B: 151/177 cycles; median, 4 of 5 cycles per patient), and the following Grade 3-4 toxicities were reported (percentage of cycles in arm A vs. arm B): anemia, 7.9% and 2.3% (P < 0.05); leukopenia, 6.0% and 6.7%; thrombocytopenia, 15.0% and 1.6% (P < 0.01); no World Health Organization (WHO) Grade 3-4 nonhematologic toxicities were observed. These side effects led to gemcitabine dose reductions in 35.1% of courses in arm A and 22.0% of courses in arm B (P < 0.05) and to gemcitabine omissions in 28.5% of courses in arm A versus 7.3% of courses in arm B (P < 0.01). Dose intensities (DIs) of gemcitabine were 607.5 mg/m(2)/week in arm A and 711.6 mg/m(2)/week in arm B (P < 0.01); DIs of cisplatin were 18. 1 mg/m(2)/week in arm A and 18.8 mg/m(2)/week in arm B. The total delivered doses of gemcitabine were 9315.5 mg/m(2) in arm A and 12, 631.0 mg/m(2) in arm B (P < 0.01); the total delivered doses of cisplatin were 277.1 mg/m(2) in arm A and 333.0 mg/m(2) in arm B (P < 0.01). Response rates according to intention to treat were 40.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.5-55.3) in arm A and 45% (95% CI, 29.5-60.5) in arm B. The overall median duration of response was 7.4 months; the median time to disease progression was 6 months (95% CI, 3-9) in arm A and 9 months (95% CI, 4-14) in arm B (P < 0.02); the median overall survival was 10 months (95% CI, 7.0-12.5) in arm A and 17 months (95% CI, 13.0-21.6) in arm B (P < 0.01); the 1-year survival rates were 34% and 63%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that arm B (cisplatin on Day 15) is less toxic than arm A (cisplatin on Day 2) and allows the administration of significantly higher total doses and dose intensities of chemotherapy. No significant differences in response rates were observed between the two schedules; patients on arm B experienced a significantly more prolonged progression free and overall survival; however, the study was not powered to detect differences in these outcomes.     

A randomised trial of accelerated and conventional radiotherapy for stage III and IV squamous carcinoma of the head and neck: a Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group Study.

PURPOSE: The aims of this randomized controlled trial were to determine whether there were differences in the disease-free survival (DFS) and toxicity between conventional radiotherapy (CRT) and a continuous 3 week accelerated radiotherapy regimen (ART) in stage III and IV squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx and hypopharynx. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients from 14 centres throughout Australia and New Zealand were randomly assigned to either CRT, using a single 2 Gy/day to a dose of 70 Gy in 35 fractions in 49 days or to ART, using 1.8 Gy twice a day to a dose of 59.4 Gy in 33 fractions in 24 days. Treatment allocation was stratified for site and stage. The accrual began in 1991 and the trial was closed in 1998 when the target of 350 patients was reached. RESULTS: The median potential follow-up time was 53 months (range, 14-101). The DFS at 5 years was 41% (95% CI, 33-50%) for ART and 35% (95% CI, 27-43%) for CRT (P=0.323) and the hazard ratio was 0.87 in favour of ART (95% CI, 0.66-1.15). The 5-year disease-specific survival rates were 40% for CRT and 46% for ART (P=0.398) and the loco-regional control was 47% for CRT vs. 52% for ART (P=0.300). The respective hazard ratios were 0.88 (95% CI, 0.65-1.2) and 0.85 (0.62-1.16), favouring the accelerated arm. In the ART arm, confluent mucositis was more severe (94 vs. 71%; P<0.001) and peaked about 3 weeks earlier than in the CRT arm, but healing appeared complete in all cases. There were statistically significant reductions in the probability of grade 2 or greater late soft tissue effects over time in the ART arm (P<0.05), except for the mucous membrane where late effects were similar in both arms. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in DFS, disease-specific survival and loco-regional control have not been demonstrated. ART resulted in more acute mucosal toxicity, but this did not result in greater prolongation of the treatment time compared with the CRT arm. There were less late effects in the ART arm, with the exception of late mucosal effects. This trial has confirmed that tumour cell repopulation occurs during conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. However, it has also provided additional evidence that overall improvements in the therapeutic ratio using accelerated fractionation strategies are seriously constrained by the need to limit total doses to levels that do not exceed acute mucosal tolerance. The accelerated schedule tested has been shown in this trial to be an acceptable alternative to conventionally fractionated irradiation to 70 Gy.     

Continuously infused carboplatin used as radiosensitizer in locally unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicenter phase III study.

PURPOSE: To determine the radiosensitizing effect of prolonged exposure of carboplatin in patients with locally unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically proven NSCLC, performance score <2, weight loss <10%, and normal organ functions were randomized between carboplatin 840 mg/m2 administered continuously during 6 weeks of radiotherapy or thoracic radiotherapy alone (both 60 Gy). Toxicity was evaluated with National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI CTC) and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria. Quality of life was measured with European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30/LC13 questionnaires. RESULTS: One-hundred and sixty patients were included. Pathologically confirmed persistent tumor was present in 53% of patients in the combination arm versus 58% in the radiotherapy alone arm (P=0.5). Median survival in the combination arm was 11.8 [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.3-14.2] months and in the radiotherapy alone arm 11.7 (95% CI 8.1-15.5) months; progression-free survival was not different between arms [6.8 and 7.5 months, respectively (P=0.28)]. Acute toxicity was mild, late toxicity was radiation-induced cardiomyopathy (three patients) and pulmonary fibrosis (five patients). Quality of life was not different between arms, but in all measured patients cough and dyspnea improved, pain became less, and slight paresthesia developed 3 months after treatment. CONCLUSION: Addition of continuously administered carboplatin as radiosensitizer for locally unresectable NSCLC does not improve local tumor control or overall survival.     

Split-course versus continuous thoracic radiation therapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: final report of a randomized phase III trial

The optimal integration of radiation and chemotherapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains unclear. This phase III trial was conducted to determine whether chemotherapy plus interdigitating split-course thoracic radiation therapy (RT) improved survival compared with standard-dose continuous thoracic RT. One hundred fourteen patients were randomized to receive 50 Gy thoracic RT delivered in 2.0-Gy fractions given continuously (5 weeks) concurrent with the first 2 cycles of chemotherapy (arm A) or 50 Gy delivered via an interdigitating split course in 2.5-Gy fractions (8 weeks) concurrent with the first 3 cycles of chemotherapy (arm B). During the split-course RT, once-daily radiation was delivered on days 8-17 of each of the first two 21-day cycles and days 8-11 of the third 21-day cycle. All patients received the following chemotherapy: cisplatin/etoposide on cycles 1, 2, and 5 and cyclophosphamide/vincristine/doxorubicin on cycles 3, 4, and 6. Prophylactic cranial irradiation was recommended after a complete response to all therapy. One hundred ten eligible patients were randomized. Grade 3/4 esophagitis was reported in 9% of patients receiving continuous thoracic RT versus 4% of patients receiving split-course RT. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was common in both treatment arms. Complete/partial response was observed in 80% of patients on arm A versus 84% on arm B. Overall survival rates at 5 years were 18% and 17% for arms A and B, respectively. Interdigitating split-course thoracic RT delivered in 2.5-Gy fractions was tolerable in patients with limited-stage SCLC but did not provide a survival advantage.     

Intermediate stage Hodgkin's disease: preliminary results on 210 patients treated with four ABVD chemotherapy cycles plus extended versus involved field radiotherapy

BACKGROUND: To improve long-term survival by reducing toxicity in intermediate stage Hodgkin's disease patients, we compared the effects of involved field (IF) versus extended field (EF) irradiation administered after four cycles of ABVD regimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and ten Hodgkin's disease patients, at clinical stage II with risk factors and III without risk factors, were enrolled in the randomized study HD94. After four courses of ABVD regimen, patients who achieved complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR) were randomly assigned to the IF or EF arm. The Kaplan-Meier method was adopted to estimate overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 78 months (range 13-111 months), OS was 98% and 96%, respectively, in the EF and IF arms; RFS was 94% and 91%, respectively, in the EF and IF arms. Conclusion: We confirm the efficacy of four cycles of ABVD regimen, with suitable dose intensity, and radiotherapy as consolidation therapy, in intermediate stage Hodgkin's disease patients (CR = 99.5% and OS = 95%). We also found that involved field radiotherapy results were as effective as extended field, without acute toxicity.     

The role of split-course hypofractionated palliative radiotherapy in head and neck cancer

Aims

A significant proportion of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma are unsuitable for radical treatment due to factors including tumour stage, performance status and co-morbidity. Palliative radiotherapy has a useful role in the control of local symptoms. This study documented the outcome with split-course hypofractionated radiotherapy.

Materials and methods

Thirty-three previously untreated patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma were treated with palliative intent with split-course radiotherapy, with an initial 20 Gy in five fractions over 1 week, a 2 week gap, and then a further 20 Gy in five fractions over 1 week at the Yorkshire Cancer Centre between January 2004 and December 2007. Data were collected retrospectively from case notes and radiotherapy records.

Results

Thirty (91%) patients had stage IV A-B disease. World Health Organization performance status was 2 or 3 in 19 (58%) patients. The median age was 76 years (range 48-91 years). Twenty-five (76%) patients were men. Symptomatic improvement was reported in 26 (79%) patients at 4-6 weeks of follow-up. Thirteen (39%) patients had a complete tumour response and 11 (33%) patients had a partial response as assessed clinically, and in some cases radiologically. The median overall survival was 9 months (range 3-43 months). Progression-free survival at 1 and 2 years was 35 and 25%, respectively. Overall survival at 1 and 2 years was 42 and 34%, respectively. Treatment was generally well tolerated; admission for nasogastric feeding and/or supportive care was required in only six patients. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade 3 toxicity was documented for skin in one patient, for mucosa in two patients and for oesophagitis in three patients.

Conclusion

Split-course hypofractionated radiotherapy is an effective palliative regimen with acceptable toxicity.     

Sequential combination of 5-fluorouracil, cis-platinum and irradiation in unresectable non-small cell lung cancer

Twenty patients with unresectable non-small cell lung carcinoma, 15 stage III and 5 stage IV (supraclavicular lymphadenopathy) were treated with a combination of three courses of chemotherapy and hypofractionated irradiation followed after 3 weeks by split-course radiotherapy. Each course was repeated every 3 weeks with the following sequence. Cis-platin (CDDP) (20 mg/m2) was given in a 20-min infusion, followed by a 2-h infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (400 mg/m2) on days 1, 2, 5 and 6. Radiation with a dose of 3 Gy on the target volume was given on days 3 and 4, after a 2-h infusion of 5-FU (400 mg/m2). Split course of irradiation consisted of 16 Gy in 5 fractions repeated after 3 weeks interval. The objective response rate was 75%. Median follow-up was 24 months, the median survival was 14 months. The 1-year survival was 53% and the 2-year survival was 16%.     

Concomitant radiotherapy with mitomycin C and bleomycin compared with radiotherapy alone in inoperable head and neck cancer: final report

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of concomitant irradiation with mitomycin C and bleomycin in patients with inoperable head and neck carcinoma with radiotherapy alone.

Methods and materials: Between March 1991 and December 1993, 64 patients with inoperable head and neck carcinoma (41 with oropharyngeal site) were randomized to radiotherapy alone (group A) or radiotherapy combined with simultaneous application of mitomycin C and bleomycin (group B). In both groups patients were irradiated five times weekly with 2 Gy to a total dose of 66–70 Gy. The planned concomitant treatment in group B was: bleomycin 5 units twice a week IM, total dose 70 units, mitomycin C 15 mg/m² IV after delivery of 10 Gy, and 10 mg/m² IV on the last day of radiotherapy. To enhance the effect of these two drugs, patients received also nicotinamide, chlorpromazine, and dicoumarol.

Because significantly better results were achieved in arm B for patients with inoperable oropharyngeal carcinoma, the study was closed and such patients were after December 1993 routinely treated with the combined therapy (as in arm B). Until October 1996, we treated and followed up 48 such consecutive patients.

Results: Median follow-up of our study patients is 42 months. Complete remission (CR) rate in group A was 31% and in group B 59% (p = 0.04); disease-free survival (DFS) in group A was 8% and in group B 37% (P = 0.01); and overall survival (OS) was 7% in group A and 26% in group B (p = 0.08). CR rate for patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma was 29% in group A (N = 21) and 75% in group B (N = 20) (p = 0.007); DFS in group A was 10% and in group B 48% (p = 0.001); and the OS was 10% in group A and 38% in group B (p = 0.019). In patients with inoperable oropharyngeal carcinoma treated after December 1993, complete remission was achieved in 32/48 (67%, 95% CI: 52%–80%). DFS at the median follow-up of 14 months was 60% (95% CI 43–77%) and OS 58% (95% CI 42–74%).

Conclusion: From the results of our study it seems that the concomitant treatment significantly improves CR rate, DFS, and OS in patients with inoperable oropharyngeal carcinoma in comparison with radiotherapy alone.