Plasma gastric inhibitory polypeptide and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 levels after glucose loading are associated with different factors in Japanese subjects

Aims/Introduction: Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) are major incretins that potentiate insulin secretion from pancreatic β‐cells. The factors responsible for incretin secretion have been reported in Caucasian subjects, but have not been thoroughly evaluated in Japanese subjects. We evaluated the factors associated with incretin secretion during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in Japanese subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT). Materials and Methods: We measured plasma GIP and GLP‐1 levels during OGTT in 17 Japanese NGT subjects and evaluated the factors associated with GIP and GLP‐1 secretion using simple and multiple regression analyses. Results: GIP secretion (AUC‐GIP) was positively associated with body mass index (P < 0.05), and area under the curve (AUC) of C‐peptide (P < 0.05) and glucagon (P < 0.01), whereas GLP‐1 secretion (AUC‐GLP‐1) was negatively associated with AUC of plasma glucose (P < 0.05). The insulinogenic index was most strongly associated with GIP secretion (P < 0.05); homeostasis model assessment β‐cell was the most the strongly associated factor in GLP‐1 secretion (P < 0.05) among the four indices of insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity. Conclusions: Several distinct factors might be associated with GIP and GLP‐1 secretion during OGTT in Japanese subjects. (J Diabetes Invest, doi: 10.1111/j.2040‐1124.2010.00078.x, 2011)     

Effect of exercise combined with glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist treatment on cardiac function: A randomized double‐blind placebo‐controlled clinical trial

In patients with type 2 diabetes, both supervised exercise and treatment with the glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) receptor agonist (GLP‐1RA) liraglutide may improve cardiac function. We evaluated cardiac function before and after 16 weeks of treatment with the GLP‐1RA liraglutide or placebo, combined with supervised exercise, in 33 dysregulated patients with type 2 diabetes on diet and/or metformin. Early diastolic myocardial tissue velocity was improved by exercise in the placebo group (mean ± standard deviation [s.d.] ?7.1 ± 1.6 to ?7.7 ± 1.8 cm/s, P = .01), but not in the liraglutide group (?7.1 ± 1.4 to ?7.0 ± 1.4 cm/s, P = .60; between groups, P = .02). Similarly, the mean ± s.d. ratio of early and atrial mitral annular tissue velocities improved in the placebo group (1.0 ± 0.4 to 1.2 ± 0.4, P = .003), but not in the liraglutide group (1.0 ± 0.3 to 1.0 ± 0.3, P = .87; between groups, P = .03). We found no significant differences in heart rate, left ventricular (LV) structure or function within or between the groups. In conclusion, the addition of liraglutide to exercise in sedentary patients with dysregulated type 2 diabetes may blunt the suggested beneficial effect of exercise on LV diastolic function.     

Twelve weeks treatment with the DPP‐4 inhibitor,sitagliptin, prevents degradation of peptide YY and improves glucose and non‐glucose induced insulin secretion in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Aim: To examine the effects of 12 weeks of treatment with the DPP‐4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, on gastrointestinal hormone responses to a standardized mixed meal and beta cell secretory capacity, measured as glucose and non‐glucose induced insulin secretion during a hyperglycaemic clamp, in patients with type 2 diabetes. Method: A double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled study over 12 weeks in which 24 patients with T2DM were randomized to receive either sitagliptin (Januvia) 100 mg qd or placebo as an add‐on therapy to metformin. In week 0, 1 and 12 patients underwent a meal test and a 90‐min 20 mM hyperglycaemic clamp with 5 g of l ‐arginine infusion. Main outcome measure was postprandial total glucagon‐like peptide 1 (GLP‐1) concentration. Additional measures were insulin and C‐peptide, glycaemic control, intact and total peptide YY (PYY) and glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), and intact glucagon‐like peptide 2 (GLP‐2) and GLP‐1. Results: All patients [sitagliptin n = 12, age: 59.5 (39–64) years, HbA1c: 8.0 (7.3–10.0)%, BMI: 33.2 (29.3–39.4); placebo n = 12, age: 60 (31–72) years, HbA1c: 7.7 (7.1–9.8)%, BMI: 30.7 (25.7–40.5)] [median (range)] completed the trial. Sitagliptin treatment improved glycaemic control, had no effect on total GLP‐1, GIP or intact GLP‐2, but reduced total PYY and PYY_{3‐ 36}, and increased PYY_{1‐ 36} and intact incretin hormones. Sitagliptin improved first and second phases of beta cell secretion and maximal secretory capacity. All effects were achieved after 1 week. No significant changes occurred in the placebo group. Conclusion: The postprandial responses of total GLP‐1 and GIP and intact GLP‐2 were unaltered. PYY degradation was prevented. Glucose and non‐glucose induced beta cell secretion was improved. There was no difference in responses to sitagliptin between 1 and 12 weeks of treatment.     

Glucose‐dependent insulinotropic peptide secretion is induced by inflammatory stimuli in an interleukin‐1‐dependent manner in mice

Recently, glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) levels have been found to be increased in response to inflammatory stimuli, leading to insulin secretion and prevention of hyperglycaemia during endotoxemia in mice. In the present study, we assess the relevance of the other incretin hormone, glucose‐dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP), as a regulator of glucose metabolism under inflammatory conditions. We found that lipopolysaccharide (LPS) increased GIP secretion in a time‐ and dose‐dependent manner in C57BL/6J mice. To elucidate the underlying mechanisms, mice were injected with inflammatory cytokines known to be released by LPS. Circulating GIP levels significantly increased in response to interleukin (IL)‐1β but not IL‐6 or tumour necrosis factor (TNF)‐α administration. Using respective knockout mice we found that LPS‐mediated GIP secretion was selectively dependent on IL‐1 signalling. To evaluate the functional relevance of inflammatory GIP secretion we pretreated mice with the GIP‐receptor antagonist (Pro3)GIP. This blunted LPS‐induced TNF‐α and IL‐6 secretion but did not affect LPS‐induced insulin secretion or blood glucose‐lowering. In conclusion, GIP provides a novel link between the immune system and the gut, with proinflammatory‐immune modulatory function but minor glucose regulatory relevance in the context of acute endotoxemia.     

The once‐daily human glucagon‐like peptide‐1 analog,liraglutide, improves β‐cell function in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes

Aims/Introduction: β‐cell function was evaluated by homeostasis model assessment of β‐cell function (HOMA‐B) index, proinsulin:insulin and proinsulin:C‐peptide ratios in adult, Japanese type 2 diabetes patients receiving liraglutide. Materials and Methods: Data from two randomized, controlled clinical trials (A and B) including 664 Japanese type 2 diabetes patients (mean values: glycated hemoglobin [HbA_1c] 8.61–9.32%; body mass index [BMI] 24.4–25.3 kg/m²) were analyzed. In two 24‐week trials, patients received liraglutide 0.9 mg (n = 268) or glibenclamide 2.5 mg (n = 132; trial A), or liraglutide 0.6, 0.9 mg (n = 176) or placebo (n = 88) added to previous sulfonylurea therapy (trial B). Results: Liraglutide was associated with improved glycemic control vs sulfonylurea monotherapy or placebo. In liraglutide‐treated groups in trials A and B, area under the curve (AUC) _{insulin 0–3 h} was improved (P < 0.001 for all) and the AUC_{insulin 0–3 h}:AUC_{glucose 0–3 h} ratio was increased (estimated treatment difference [liraglutide–comparator] 0.058 [0.036, 0.079]). HOMA‐B significantly increased with liraglutide relative to comparator in trial B (P < 0.05), but not in trial A. The reduction in fasting proinsulin:insulin ratio was 50% greater than in comparator groups. Conclusions: In Japanese type 2 diabetes patients, liraglutide was associated with effective glycemic control, restoration of prandial insulin response and indications of improved β‐cell function. This trial was registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (trial A: no. NCT00393718/JapicCTI‐060328 and trial B: no. NCT00395746/JapicCTI‐060324). (J Diabetes Invest, doi: 10.1111/j.2040‐1124.2012.00193.x, 2012)     

Effect of single‐dose DPP‐4 inhibitor sitagliptin on β‐cell function and incretin hormone secretion after meal ingestion in healthy volunteers and drug‐naïve,well‐controlled type 2 diabetes subjects

To explore the effects of a single dose of the DPP‐4 inhibitor sitagliptin on glucose‐standardized insulin secretion and β‐cell glucose sensitivity after meal ingestion, 12 healthy and 12 drug‐naïve, well‐controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) subjects (mean HbA1c 43 mmol/mol, 6.2%) received sitagliptin (100 mg) or placebo before a meal (525 kcal). β‐cell function was measured as the insulin secretory rate at a standardized glucose concentration and the β‐cell glucose sensitivity (the slope between glucose and insulin secretory rate). Incretin levels were also monitored. Sitagliptin increased standardized insulin secretion, in both healthy and T2D subjects, compared to placebo, but without increasing β‐cell glucose sensitivity. Sitagliptin also increased active glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) and reduced total (reflecting the secretion) GIP, but not total GLP‐1 levels. We conclude that a single dose of DPP‐4 inhibition induces dissociated effects on different aspects of β‐cell function and incretin hormones after meal ingestion in both healthy and well‐controlled T2D subjects.     

Biological and functional characteristics of a novel low-molecular weight antagonist of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor, SKL-14959, in vitro and in vivo

Aim: We recently discovered a glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor antagonist, SKL‐14959. GIP plays a role in the glucose and lipid metabolism, and is associated with obesity and insulin resistance. Therefore, we aimed to ascertain the inhibitory potency and glucose and lipid metabolism of SKL‐14959. Methods: SKL‐14959 was evaluated for its binding affinity to each GIP, glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) and glucagon receptors by each labelled and non‐labelled ligand; GIP‐stimulated cyclic AMP (cAMP) production in CHO cells expressing human GIP receptor in vitro. Oral and intraperitoneal glucose tolerance tests (OGTT and IPGTT) were performed to examine the insulinotropic effect on endogenous and exogenous GIP. Oil tolerance tests were also conducted to examine the lipid metabolism and the postheparin plasma lipase activity, lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and hepatic lipase (HL). Result: SKL‐14959 selectively bound to GIP receptor and inhibited GIP‐stimulated cAMP production with the Ki value of 55 nM and an IC₅₀ value of 2.9 µM, respectively. SKL‐14959·Na significantly increased blood glucose levels, inhibited insulin secretion in OGTT and inhibited the plasma glucose lowering of exogenous GIP in IPGTT. Furthermore, SKL‐14959 increased plasma triacylglycerol (TG) levels as well as suppressed the postheparin plasma lipase activity in an oil load test. Conclusion: These data indicate that SKL‐14959 is distinguished in the physiological phenotype of GIP following direct binding to the receptor.     

Effects of DPP‐4 inhibitor linagliptin and GLP‐1 receptor agonist liraglutide on physiological response to hypoglycaemia in Japanese subjects with type 2 diabetes: A randomized,open‐label, 2‐arm parallel comparative,exploratory trial

Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 (DPP‐4) inhibitors reduce the risk of hypoglycaemia, possibly through augmentation of glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) action, but not that of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) on glucagon secretion. To examine this model in Japanese individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D), the effects of the DPP‐4 inhibitor linagliptin on glucagon and other counter‐regulatory hormone responses to hypoglycaemia were evaluated and compared with those of the GLP‐1 receptor agonist liraglutide in a multi‐centre, randomized, open‐label, 2‐arm parallel comparative, exploratory trial. Three‐step hypoglycaemic clamp glucose tests preceded by meal tolerance tests were performed before and after 2‐week treatment with the drugs. Glucagon levels were increased during the hypoglycaemic clamp test at 2.5 mmol/L. This increase was similar in the linagliptin and liraglutide groups, both before and after the 2‐week treatment. Changes in other counter‐regulatory hormones (ie, growth hormone, cortisol, epinephrine and norepinephrine) were also similar between the groups, but were suppressed substantially after 2‐week treatment compared to baseline. In conclusion, we confirmed that the glucagon response to hypoglycaemia was not affected by linagliptin or liraglutide treatment in Japanese individuals with T2D.     

Effect of liraglutide on ectopic fat in polycystic ovary syndrome: A randomized clinical trial

Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) were treated with the GLP‐1 receptor agonist liraglutide to investigate the effect on liver fat content, visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and the prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). In a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, randomized clinical trial 72 women with PCOS, with a BMI > 25 kg/m² and/or insulin resistance, were treated with liraglutide or received placebo 1.8 mg/d (2:1) for 26 weeks. Liver fat content was assessed by ¹ HMR spectroscopy, VAT by MRI, body composition by DXA, and glucose metabolism by oral glucose tolerance test. Compared with placebo, liraglutide treatment reduced body weight by 5.2 kg (5.6%), liver fat content by 44%, VAT by 18%, and the prevalence of NAFLD by two‐thirds (all P < .01). Sex‐hormone‐binding‐globulin (SHBG) levels increased by 19% (P = .03), and free testosterone decreased by 19% (P = .054). HbA1c, fasting glucose and leptin were reduced (all: P < .05), whereas measures of insulin resistance, adiponectin and glucagon did not change. In conclusion, 26 weeks of liraglutide treatment in PCOS resulted in significant reductions in liver fat content, VAT and the prevalence of NAFLD.     

Effects of glucose and meal ingestion on incretin secretion in Japanese subjects with normal glucose tolerance

Aims/Introduction: Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) are the major incretins; their secretion after various nutrient loads are well‐evaluated in Caucasians. However, little is known of the relationship between incretin secretion and differing nutritional loading in Japanese subjects. In the present study, we evaluated GIP and GLP‐1 secretion in Japanese subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) after glucose loading (75 g glucose and 17 g glucose) and meal ingestion. Materials and Methods: A total of 10 Japanese NGT subjects participated in 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), 17 g OGTT and meal tolerance test (MTT). Plasma glucose (PG), serum insulin (IRI), serum C‐peptide (CPR), plasma total GIP, and plasma total GLP‐1 levels during OGTT and MTT were determined. Results: Area under the curve (AUC)‐GIP was increased in proportion to the amount of glucose, and was highest in MTT, showing that GIP secretion is also stimulated by nutrients other than glucose, such as lipid. In contrast, although the larger glucose load tended to induce a larger GLP‐1 release, AUC‐GLP‐1 was not significantly different among the three loading tests (75 g OGTT, 17 g OGTT, MTT) irrespective of the kind or amount of nutrition load. Conclusions: Our results suggest that nutritional composition might have a greater effect on GIP secretion than that on GLP‐1 secretion in Japanese NGT subjects . (J Diabetes Invest, doi: 10.1111/j.2040‐1124.2011.00143.x, 2012)     

Running on mixed fuel‐dual agonistic approach of GLP‐1 and GCG receptors leads to beneficial impact on body weight and blood glucose control: A comparative study between mice and non‐human primates

Aim

We performed acute and chronic studies in healthy and diet‐induced obese animals using mouse‐specific or monkey‐specific dual GLP‐1R/GCGR agonists to investigate their effects on food intake, body weight, blood glucose control and insulin secretion. The selective GLP‐1R agonist liraglutide was used as comparator.

Methods

The mouse‐specific dual agonist and liraglutide were tested in lean wild type, GLP‐1R knockout and diet‐induced obese mice at different doses. A chronic study was performed in DIO mice to investigate the effect on body weight, food consumption and total energy expenditure (TEE) in obese and diabetic monkeys with a focus on body weight and energy intake.

Results

The mouse‐specific dual agonist and liraglutide similarly affected glycaemic control. A higher loss in body weight was measured in dual agonist‐treated obese mice. The dual agonist significantly enhanced plasma glucose excursion in overnight fed GLP‐1R^?/? mice, probably reflecting a potent GCGR agonist activity. It increased TEE and enhanced fat and carbohydrate oxidation, while liraglutide produced no effect on TEE. In obese and diabetic monkeys, treatment with the monkey‐specific dual agonist reduced total energy intake to 60%‐70% of baseline TEI during chronic treatment. A decrease in body weight and significant improvement in glucose tolerance was observed.

Conclusions

In DIO mice and non‐human primates, dual agonists elicited robust glycaemic control, similar to the marketed GLP‐1R agonist, while eliciting greater effects on body weight. Results from DIO mice suggest that the increase in TEE is caused not only by increased fat oxidation but also by an increase in carbohydrate oxidation.     

Regular low‐calorie sweetener consumption is associated with increased secretion of glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide

Low‐calorie sweeteners (LCSs) are widely used for weight control despite limited evidence of their effectiveness and studies linking LCS consumption with incident obesity. We tested the hypothesis that regular LCS consumption is associated with higher postprandial glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) secretion, which has been linked to obesity. We used data from participants in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging who had completed a diet diary, had at least one visit during which they underwent an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), and had no diabetes. Of 232 participants, 166 contributed 1, 39 contributed 2, and 27 contributed 3 visits, and 96 (41%) reported using LCS. Plasma OGTT samples were analysed for glucose, insulin and GIP. Fasting glucose, insulin and GIP levels were no different between LCS users and non‐users. The association of LCS use with 2‐hour OGTT responses after adjustment for covariates was non‐significant for glucose (P = .98) and insulin (P = .18), but significant for greater increase in GIP in LCS users (P = .037). Regular consumption of LCSs was associated with greater increases in GIP secretion after food intake, which may potentially lead to weight gain through the lipogenic properties of GIP.     

Glucagon‐like peptide 1‐potentiated insulin secretion and proliferation of pancreatic β‐cells GLP‐1促进胰岛素分泌和胰岛β细胞增殖的机制

Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) is the primary incretin hormone secreted from the intestine upon uptake of food to stimulate insulin secretion from pancreatic β‐cells. GLP‐1 exerts its effects by binding to its G‐protein coupled receptors and subsequently activating adenylate cyclase, leading to generation of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). cAMP stimulates insulin secretion via activation of its effectors PKA and Epac2 in pancreatic β‐cells. In addition to its insulinotropic effects, GLP‐1 also preserves pancreatic β‐cell mass by stimulating β‐cell proliferation. Unlike the action of sulphonylureas in lowering blood glucose levels, action of GLP‐1 is affected by and interplays with glucose levels. Due to such advantages, GLP‐1‐based therapeutics have been rapidly developed and used clinically for treatment of type 2 diabetes. However, molecular mechanisms underlying how GLP‐1 potentiates diminished glucose‐stimulated insulin secretion and β‐cell proliferation under diabetic conditions are not well understood. Here, we review the actions of GLP‐1 in regulation of insulin secretion and pancreatic β‐cell proliferation.     

Liraglutide,a once‐daily human GLP‐1 analogue,improves pancreatic B‐cell function and arginine‐stimulated insulin secretion during hyperglycaemia in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Aims To assess the effect of liraglutide, a once‐daily human glucagon‐like peptide‐1 analogue on pancreatic B‐cell function. Methods Patients with Type 2 diabetes (n = 39) were randomized to treatment with 0.65, 1.25 or 1.9 mg/day liraglutide or placebo for 14 weeks. First‐ and second‐phase insulin release were measured by means of the insulin‐modified frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test. Arginine‐stimulated insulin secretion was measured during a hyperglycaemic clamp (20 mmol/l). Glucose effectiveness and insulin sensitivity were estimated by means of the insulin‐modified frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test. Results The two highest doses of liraglutide (1.25 and 1.9 mg/day) significantly increased first‐phase insulin secretion by 118 and 103%, respectively (P < 0.05). Second‐phase insulin secretion was significantly increased only in the 1.25 mg/day group vs. placebo. Arginine‐stimulated insulin secretion increased significantly at the two highest dose levels vs. placebo by 114 and 94%, respectively (P < 0.05). There was no significant treatment effect on glucose effectiveness or insulin sensitivity. Conclusions Fourteen weeks of treatment with liraglutide showed improvements in first‐ and second‐phase insulin secretion, together with improvements in arginine‐stimulated insulin secretion during hyperglycaemia.     

Investigation of the effect of oral metformin on dipeptidylpeptidase‐4 (DPP‐4) activity in Type 2 diabetes1

Aims Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) is an insulinotropic hormone and major component of the enteroinsular axis. Its therapeutic potential in human diabetes is limited by rapid degradation and inactivation by the enzyme dipeptidylpeptidase‐4 (DPP‐4). We investigated the acute effects of metformin with and without food on DPP‐4 activity in Type 2 diabetes. Methods Ten subjects with Type 2 diabetes (6 male/4 female, age 65.8 ± 2.6 years, body mass index 30.0 ± 1.2 kg/m², glycated haemoglobin (HbA_1c) 6.3 ± 0.2%, mean ± sem ) received metformin 1 g orally or placebo together with a standard mixed meal (SMM) in a random crossover design. Six subjects re‐attended fasting and received metformin 1 g without a SMM. Results Following SMM (n = 10), DPP‐4 activity was not suppressed by metformin compared with placebo [area under curve (AUC)_{0–4 h} 1574 ± 4 vs. 1581 ± 8 μmol/ml/min, respectively]. Plasma glucose, insulin and active GLP‐1 were not different. However, DPP‐4 activity was suppressed with metformin following fasting compared with a SMM (n = 6) (AUC_{0–4 h} 1578 ± 4 vs. 1494 ± 9 μmol/min, P < 0.02). Metformin serum levels were significantly lower (P < 0.001) after SMM than fasting (AUC_{0–4 h} 350 ± 66 vs. 457 ± 55 mg/ml/min). Conclusion Metformin inhibits DPP‐4 activity in Type 2 diabetic patients in the fasting state but not when taken with a standard mixed meal. Metformin serum concentrations are lower if the drug is taken with food. These findings should be taken into account in establishing how to maximize efficacy of the drug.     

Metformin reduces the rate of small intestinal glucose absorption in type 2 diabetes

In rodents, metformin slows intestinal glucose absorption, potentially increasing exposure of the distal gut to glucose to enhance postprandial glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) secretion. We evaluated the effects of metformin on serum 3‐O‐methylglucose (3‐OMG; a marker of glucose absorption) and plasma total GLP‐1 concentrations during a standardized intraduodenal infusion of glucose and 3‐OMG in patients with type 2 diabetes. A total of 12 patients, treated with metformin 850 mg twice daily or placebo for 7 days each in a double‐blind, randomized, crossover design (14 days’ washout between treatments), were evaluated on days 5 or 8 of each treatment (6 subjects each). On each study day, 30 minutes after ingesting 850 mg metformin or placebo, patients received an infusion of glucose (60 g + 5 g 3‐OMG, dissolved in water to 240 mL) via an intraduodenal catheter over the course of 120 minutes. Compared with placebo, metformin was associated with lower serum 3‐OMG ( P < .001) and higher plasma total GLP‐1 ( P = .003) concentrations. The increment in plasma GLP‐1 after metformin vs placebo was related to the reduction in serum 3‐OMG concentrations ( P = .019). Accordingly, metformin inhibits small intestinal glucose absorption, which may contribute to augmented GLP‐1 secretion in type 2 diabetes.     

Chronic administration of DSP‐7238, a novel,potent, specific and substrate‐selective DPP IV inhibitor,improves glycaemic control and β‐cell damage in diabetic mice

Aims: The purpose of this study is to assess the in vitro enzyme inhibition profile of DSP‐7238, a novel non‐cyanopyrrolidine dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP) IV inhibitor and to evaluate the acute and chronic effects of this compound on glucose metabolism in two different mouse models of type 2 diabetes. Methods: The in vitro enzyme inhibition profile of DSP‐7238 was assessed using plasma and recombinant enzymes including DPP IV, DPP II, DPP8, DPP9 and fibroblast activation protein α (FAPα) with fluorogenic substrates. The inhibition type was evaluated based on the Lineweaver–Burk plot. Substrate selectivity of DSP‐7238 and comparator DPP IV inhibitors (vildagliptin, sitagliptin, saxagliptin and linagliptin) was evaluated by mass spectrometry based on the changes in molecular weight of peptide substrates caused by release of N‐terminal dipeptides. In the in vivo experiments, high‐fat diet‐induced obese (DIO) mice were subjected to oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) following a single oral administration of DSP‐7238. To assess the chronic effects of DSP‐7238 on glycaemic control and pancreatic β‐cell damage, DSP‐7238 was administered for 11 weeks to mice made diabetic by a combination of high‐fat diet (HFD) and a low‐dose of streptozotocin (STZ). After the dosing period, HbA1c was measured and pancreatic damage was evaluated by biological and histological analyses. Results: DSP‐7238 and sitagliptin both competitively inhibited recombinant human DPP IV (rhDPP IV) with K_i values of 0.60 and 2.1 nM respectively. Neither vildagliptin nor saxagliptin exhibited competitive inhibition of rhDPP IV. DSP‐7238 did not inhibit DPP IV‐related enzymes including DPP8, DPP9, DPP II and FAPα, whereas vildagliptin and saxagliptin showed inhibition of DPP8 and DPP9. Inhibition of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) degradation by DSP‐7238 was apparently more potent than its inhibition of chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) ligand 10 (IP‐10) or chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) ligand 12 (SDF‐1α) degradation. In contrast, vildagliptin and saxagliptin showed similar degree of inhibition of degradation for all the substrates tested. Compared to treatment with the vehicle, single oral administration of DSP‐7238 dose‐dependently decreased plasma DPP IV activity and improved glucose tolerance in DIO mice. In addition, DSP‐7238 significantly decreased HbA1c and ameliorated pancreatic damage following 11 weeks of chronic treatment in HFD/STZ mice. Conclusions: We have shown in this study that DSP‐7238 is a potent DPP IV inhibitor that has high specificity for DPP IV and substrate selectivity against GLP‐1. We have also found that chronic treatment with DSP‐7238 improves glycaemic control and ameliorates β‐cell damage in a mouse model with impaired insulin sensitivity and secretion. These findings indicate that DSP‐7238 may be a new therapeutic agent for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.     

Effects of liraglutide on cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 1 diabetes

We investigated the short‐term effect of adding liraglutide 1.8 mg once daily to insulin treatment on cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 1 diabetes. In total, 100 overweight (BMI ≥25 kg/m²) adult patients (age ≥18 years) with type 1 diabetes and HbA1c ≥ 8% (64 mmol/mol) were randomized to liraglutide 1.8 mg or placebo added to insulin treatment in a 24‐week double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled trial. At baseline and after 24 weeks of treatment, 24‐hour blood pressure and heart rate, pulse pressure, pulse wave velocity and carotid intima‐media thickness were evaluated. Compared with placebo, liraglutide increased 24‐hour heart rate by 4.6 beats per minute (BPM); P = .0015, daytime heart rate by 3.7; P = .0240 and night‐time heart rate by 7.5 BPM; P < .001 after 24 weeks. Diastolic nocturnal blood pressure increased by 4 mm Hg; P = .0362 in the liraglutide group compared with placebo. In conclusion, in patients with long‐standing type 1 diabetes, liraglutide as add‐on to insulin increased heart rate and did not improve other cardiovascular risk factors after 24 weeks of treatment.     

Differential effects of once‐weekly glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist dulaglutide and metformin on pancreatic β‐cell and insulin sensitivity during a standardized test meal in patients with type 2 diabetes

This substudy of the AWARD‐3 trial evaluated the effects of the once‐weekly glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist, dulaglutide, versus metformin on glucose control, pancreatic function and insulin sensitivity, after standardized test meals in patients with type 2 diabetes. Meals were administered at baseline, 26 and 52 weeks to patients randomized to monotherapy with dulaglutide 1.5 mg/week (n = 133), dulaglutide 0.75 mg/week (n = 136), or metformin ≥1500 mg/day (n = 140). Fasting and postprandial serum glucose, insulin, C‐peptide and glucagon levels were measured up to 3 h post‐meal. β‐cell function and insulin sensitivity were assessed using empirical variables and mathematical modelling. At 26 weeks, similar decreases in area under the curve for glucose [AUC_glucose (0–3 h)] were observed among all groups. β‐cell function [AUC_insulin/AUC_glucose (0–3 h)] increased with dulaglutide and was unchanged with metformin (p ≤ 0.005, both doses). Dulaglutide improved insulin secretion rate at 9 mmol/l glucose (p ≤ 0.04, both doses) and β‐cell glucose sensitivity (p = 0.004, dulaglutide 1.5 mg). Insulin sensitivity increased more with metformin versus dulaglutide. In conclusion, dulaglutide improves postprandial glycaemic control after a standardized test meal by enhancing β‐cell function, while metformin exerts a greater effect on insulin sensitivity.