Similar Virologic and Immunologic Efficacy With Fosamprenavir Boosted With 100 mg or 200 mg of Ritonavir in HIV-Infected Patients: Results of the LESS Trial

Abstract

Purpose: Ritonavir (RTV) effectively boosts most protease inhibitors but is associated with significant dose-dependent adverse events (AEs). In an effort to better manage toxicities through a reduced dose of RTV, this study compared fosamprenavir (FPV) boosted with RTV 100 mg (FPV/r100) or with RTV 200 mg (FPV/r200) daily. Methods: This 24-week, open-label study enrolled patients taking a FPV/r200-containing regimen who had HIV RNA <400 copies/mL and randomized them 1:2 to continue that regimen or simplify to FPV/r100 once daily. Other medications were not altered. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients without suspected or confirmed virologic failure (HIV RNA ≥400 copies/mL) through week 24 by a missing/discontinuation equals failure (M/D=F) analysis. Noninferiority criteria were demonstrated if the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in the primary endpoint rates between groups was greater than ?12. Results: The 2 regimens met prespecified noninferiority criteria (FPV/r100, 92%; FPV/r200, 94%; 95% CI, ?9.36 to 5.12). At week 24, the percentage of patients with HIV RNA <50 copies/mL by M/ D=F was 83% in the FPV/r100 group and 85% in the FPV/r200 group. Drug-related grade 2?4 AEs were uncommon (FPV/r100, 4%; FPV/r200, 7%). Median changes in lipids were similar in both groups, with the exception of triglycerides (FPV/r100, ?21 mg/dL; FPV/r200, ?2 mg/dL). Conclusions: This 24-week study demonstrated that among previously suppressed patients, once-daily FPV/r100 was similar to FPV/r200 in virologic and immunologic effects but was associated with greater decreases from baseline in triglyceride levels.     

Once-daily regimen of saquinavir, ritonavir, didanosine, and lamivudine in HIV-infected patients with standard tuberculosis therapy (TBQD Study)

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of a once-daily regimen with didanosine, lamivudine, saquinavir, and low-dose ritonavir in antiretroviral (ARV)-naive patients with tuberculosis treated with rifampin and the influence of rifampin on plasma trough concentration (Ctrough) of saquinavir. METHODS: Single-arm, prospective, multicenter, open-label pilot study, including 32 adult ARV-naive subjects with HIV infection and tuberculosis under standard treatment that included rifampin (600 mg q.d.) and isoniazid (300 mg q.d.). After 2 months of tuberculosis treatment, patients were started on once-daily ARV therapy, consisting of didanosine, lamivudine, ritonavir (200 mg), and saquinavir soft gel capsules (1600 mg). HIV RNA level, CD4 cell count, clinical and laboratory toxicity, and saquinavir Ctrough during and after antituberculosis therapy were analyzed. RESULTS: After 48 weeks of follow-up, 20 of 32 patients (62.5%; 95% CI: 45.8% to 79.2%) in the intent-to-treat population and 20 of 28 (71.4%; 95% CI: 54.4% to 88.4%) in the on-treatment population had an HIV RNA level <50 copies/mL. Treatment tolerance was acceptable in all patients except for 2 with biologic hepatic toxicity leading to discontinuation. Seven patients had virologic failure. In 10 patients (36%), saquinavir Ctrough was <0.05 microg/mL during tuberculosis therapy and 5 of them had virologic failure. The median saquinavir Ctrough was 44% lower (interquartile range: 19% to 71%) with coadministration of rifampin than without. CONCLUSION: The combination of didanosine, lamivudine, saquinavir, and ritonavir may be a useful treatment regimen for patients with tuberculosis in whom a once-daily protease inhibitor-containing regimen is considered indicated. Nevertheless, on the basis of pharmacokinetic profile the dose of 1600/200 mg of saquinavir/ritonavir cannot be recommended. Further studies with higher doses of saquinavir (2000 mg) boosted with ritonavir are warranted.     

Atazanavir Plasma Concentrations Vary Significantly Between Patients and Correlate with Increased Serum Bilirubin Concentrations

Abstract

Background: Atazanavir (ATV) is recommended to be dosed at 400 mg once daily or 300 mg daily coadministered with 100 mg ritonavir (RTV). Method: 31 male patients receiving ATV either alone or boosted with RTV for more than 2 weeks had ATV concentration measured by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). ATV concentrations were adjusted to obtain a 24-hour trough level using a standard pharmacokinetic formula. Results: 25 samples were taken from patients who received 300 mg ATV, 6 with 200 mg, 3 with 400 mg, and 2 with 150 mg, all boosted with 100 mg RTV. In the unboosted group, patients received 400 mg (7) or 600 mg (2). The median adjusted 24-hour trough ATV concentration was 630 ng/mL (interquartile range [IQR] 355-1034) in the boosted and 113 ng/mL (IQR 50-225) in the unboosted group (p = .001). Median serum bilirubin concentration was 34 IU/L (IQR 27.5-49) and 41 IU/L (IQR 31-45) in the boosted and unboosted groups, respectively. In the boosted group, high ATV concentrations were significantly correlated with increased serum bilirubin concentrations (p = .003). Conclusion: ATV concentrations showed considerable interpatient variability. Bilirubin concentrations are an indicator of high ATV concentrations and may prove to be useful in selecting patients for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM).     

Treatment Durability,Effectiveness, and Safety with Atazanavir/Ritonavir-Based HAART Regimen in Treatment-Naïve HIV-lnfected Patients

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the durability of treatment, virological and immunologi-cal response, and safety of an atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/RTV)-based highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen in treatment-naïve HIV-infected patients. Methods: This was a multicentre retrospective study. Medical charts of antiret-roviral-na’i’ve HIV-infected adults who initiated ATV/RTV (300/100 mg) from January 2004 to December 2007 in 10 Canadian clinics were reviewed. Data were collected from time of ATV/RTV treatment initiation until discontinuation of ATV. Durability of treatment and time to virological response were estimated with Kaplan-Meier functions. Change in viral load, CD4 cell counts, and lipid parameters were assessed with linear regression analyses. Results: 176 patients were enrolled, 153 (86.9%) were male, and the majority (52.3%) were 40 to 54 years old. Duration of observation ranged from 1.6 to 56 months. The mean (S£) durability of treatment was 33.5 (0.7) months. There were 37 (21.0%) patients who discontinued ATV/ RTV, among whom 18 (10.2%) discontinued due to toxicity, suboptimal virological response, loss to follow-up, or death. The mean (S£) time to HIV viral load of <50 and <400 copies/mL was 6.6 (0.4) and 4.3 (0.3) months, respectively. At 96 weeks of treatment, least squares mean (LSM) estimated change in log₁₀(HIV copies/mL) was -2.94 (P < .001) and +245 cells/mL (P < .001) for CD4 cell count. A significant LSM increase in HDL-C of 0.24 mmol/L (P = .007 for trend over time) was also observed; total cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL-C increased over time but their change did not reach statistical significance. The most frequently reported adverse event was increased bilirubin (16.5%). Conclusions: ATV/RTV-based first-line HAART regimen demonstrated durability and effectiveness and was well tolerated in treatment-naïve HIV-infected patients.     

Once-Daily Abacavir/Lamivudine and Ritonavir-Boosted Atazanavir for the Treatment of HIV-1 Infection in Antiretroviral-Naïve Patients: A 48-Week Pilot Study

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the efficacy and safety of a once-daily (QD) regimen consisting of the co-formulation of abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) and atazanavir plus ritonavir (ATV-RTV) in antiretroviral (ART)-naïve patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA >5,000 copies/mL. Method: This open-label, multicenter study conducted between September 2004 and June 2006 included 112 patients who received ABC 600 mg/3TC 300 mg and ATV 300 mg-RTV 100 mg QD. Drug switches were permitted for ABC hypersensitivity and ATV-related hyperbilirubinemia. Primary endpoints were proportion of patients achieving HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 48 and treatment discontinuation due to study drugs. Results: A total of 111 patients were treated. At Week 48, the proportion of patients achieving HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL was 77% (85/111) by intent-to-treat (ITT) missing=failure, switch included response rate. Drug substitutions occurred in 8 (7%) patients for suspected ABC hypersensitivity reaction (HSR) and in 6 (5%) patients for ATV-related toxicities; only 1 patient discontinued study due to ABC HSR. Four patients met confirmed virologic nonresponse (HIV RNA ?400 copies/mL). Treatment-emergent drug resistance was rare, and no patient had virus that developed reduced susceptibility to ATV. Median change from baseline (95% confidence interval) in fasting lipids at Week 48 was 39 (26–66) mg/dL for triglycerides, 28 (22–38) mg/dL for total cholesterol (C), 14 (10.5–16) mg/dL for HDL-C, and 8 (2–16.5) mg/dL for LDL-C. Conclusion: ABC/3TC and ATV-RTV QD is an effective and well-tolerated regimen in ART-naïve patients through 48 weeks, with a modest impact on fasting lipids.     

Antiviral activity of enteric-coated didanosine,stavudine, and nelfinavir versus zidovudine plus lamivudine and nelfinavir

OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare the activity and safety of capsules containing enteric-coated beadlets of didanosine given once daily with stavudine and nelfinavir with that of a standard reference triple drug regimen of zidovudine plus lamivudine and nelfinavir. DESIGN: Multinational, 49-site, prospective, open-label, randomized, two-arm comparison study. PARTICIPANTS: HIV-infected subjects with limited or no previous antiretroviral therapy who had plasma HIV RNA levels of >or=2000 copies/mL and CD4 cell counts of >or=200/mm3 (511 were randomized to treatment groups, and 352 completed the study). INTERVENTIONS: Triple antiretroviral therapy for 48 weeks: didanosine EC (400 mg once daily), stavudine (40 mg twice daily), and nelfinavir (750 mg three times daily) or a twice-daily coformulation of zidovudine (300 mg) plus lamivudine (150 mg) and nelfinavir (750 mg three times daily). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Proportion of subjects with HIV RNA levels of <400 copies/mL at week 48 based on an "intent-to-treat, missing = treatment failure" analysis. RESULTS: The two treatment groups were similar in the proportion of treatment responders (i.e., HIV RNA level of <400 copies/mL), with 54% of subjects in the didanosine EC and zidovudine plus lamivudine treatment groups responding at week 48. Results of other analyses supported those of the primary analysis. The two study regimens were associated with similar numbers of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The antiviral efficacy of a triple combination regimen containing once-daily didanosine EC is similar to that of a reference triple combination regimen.     

A once-daily lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimen provides noninferior antiviral activity compared with a twice-daily regimen

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and noninferiority and to explore the efficacy of administration of once-daily versus twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected subjects. DESIGN: Randomized, open-label, multicenter, comparative study. METHODS: One hundred ninety antiretroviral-naive subjects with plasma HIV-1 RNA level >1000 copies/mL and any CD4 cell count were randomized to lopinavir/ritonavir at a dose of 800/200 mg administered once daily (n = 115) or lopinavir/ritonavir at a dose of 400/100 mg administered twice daily (n = 75). Subjects also received tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) at a dose of 300 mg and emtricitabine (FTC) at a dose of 200 mg administered once daily. RESULTS: The median baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA level and CD4 count were 4.8 log10 copies/mL and 216 cells/mm, respectively. Before week 48, 20% (once daily) and 29% (twice daily) subjects discontinued. Virologic responses of the subjects through 48 weeks were comparable; 70% (once daily) and 64% (twice daily) achieved an HIV-1 RNA level <50 copies/mL by intent-to-treat, noncompleter = failure analysis. No subject demonstrated LPV or TDF resistance, but 3 subjects (2 in the once-daily group, 1 in the twice-daily group) demonstrated FTC resistance. Mean increases in CD4 count were similar. Diarrhea (16% in the once-daily group, 5% in the twice-daily group; P = 0.036) was the most common moderate or severe study drug-related adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: Through 48 weeks, a once-daily regimen of lopinavir/ritonavir + TDF + FTC appears to have similar virologic and immunologic responses in antiretroviral-naive subjects as the same regimen with lopinavir/ritonavir administered twice daily. Both regimens were relatively well tolerated, and no LPV or TDF resistance was observed.     

Comparison of two indinavir/ritonavir regimens in the treatment of HIV-infected individuals

BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic enhancement of protease inhibitors (PIs) with low-dose ritonavir (RTV) for salvage therapy is increasingly common. The purpose of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of indinavir (IDV)/RTV at 800/200 mg (arm A) and 400/400 mg (arm B) administered twice daily in HIV-infected subjects failing their first PI-based regimen. METHODS: A phase I/II, randomized, open-label, 24-week study was conducted. Formal 12-hour pharmacokinetic evaluations were performed, and study visits occurred at baseline; at weeks 1, 2, and 4; and every 4 week thereafter for 24 weeks. Clinical symptoms and laboratory assessments were collected. Subjects were allowed to switch arms because of toxicity. RESULTS: Forty-four subjects were enrolled (22 per arm). IDV predose concentration, maximum plasma concentration and area under the curve were significantly higher in arm A. Fifty-five percent and 45% of subjects in arms A and B responded (<200 copies/mL at week 24; P = 0.76), respectively. CD4 cell responses were similar. All subjects had IDV-sensitive virus at baseline and at virologic failure. Tolerability was comparable, but all grade 3 or higher triglyceride increases occurred in arm B and more subjects in arm B switched because of toxicity (5 vs. 1 triglyceride increases). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest formal pharmacokinetic evaluation of 2 dosage combinations of IDV/RTV in HIV-infected individuals. Pharmacokinetic parameters were consistent with previous results in patients but lower than in seronegative controls. Both regimens exhibited similar tolerability and response rates. High toxicity with a low response suggests that the optimum IDV/RTV combination would include an RTV dose <400 mg and an IDV dose <800 mg in this population.     

Pharmacokinetics,Efficacy, and Safety of Darunavir/Ritonavir 800/100 mg Once-Daily in Treatment-Naïve and -Experienced Patients

Abstract

Darunavir is a new protease inhibitor (PI) with in vitro activity against wild-type and PI-resistant HIV; it is used with the pharmacokinetic booster ritonavir. The currently approved dose of darunavir/ritonavir is 600/100 mg twice-daily, licensed for treatment-experienced patients. However, during the clinical development of darunavir, a range of once-daily and twice-daily doses of darunavir/ritonavir were evaluated. The relatively long terminal elimination plasma half-life of darunavir (15 hours) supports once-daily dosing. In treatment-naïve patients, the ARTEMIS trial has shown high rates of HIV RNA suppression for darunavir-ritonavir at the 800/100 mg once-daily dose (84% with HIV RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 48) versus a control arm of lopinavir/ritonavir (78% with HIV RNA <50 copies/mL). In a population pharmacokinetic substudy, darunavir 24-hour minimum plasma concentration levels remained above the predefined EC₅₀ of 55 ng/mL for all 335 patients evaluated in the ARTEMIS trial. Once-daily darunavir/ritonavir has also been evaluated in treatment-experienced patients in the TMC114-C207 proof-of-principle trial and the POWER 1 and 2 trials. For the overall POWER trial population, with significant baseline resistance to PIs, the rates of HIV RNA suppression <50 copies/mL at Week 24 for darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once-daily were lower than for the 600/100 mg twice-daily dosage (31% vs. 47%, respectively). However, for patients with no genotypic darunavir resistance-associated mutations at baseline, rates of HIV RNA suppression were 62% and 67% for the 800/100 mg once-daily and 600/100 mg twice-daily doses. The current evidence from clinical trials of darunavir/ritonavir supports the efficacy of the 800/100 mg once-daily dose for treatment-naïve patients and further evaluation for treatment-experienced patients with no genotypic resistance to darunavir.     

ARIES 144 Week Results: Durable Virologic Suppression in HIV-Infected Patients Simplified to Unboosted Atazanavir/Abacavir/Lamivudine

Abstract

Background: The open-label study ARIES (http://ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00440947) utilized a ritonavir (/r)-boosted protease inhibitor treatment simplification strategy. Antiretroviral-naïve subjects received abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) + atazanavir/ ritonavir (ATV/r) from baseline through randomization at week 36, then maintained or discontinued ritonavir for an additional 108 weeks. Non-inferiority of the unboosted regimen was demonstrated at week 84. In this optional extension phase, virologic suppression and adverse events were assessed through week 144.Methods: Patients were randomized at week 36 if they had confirmed HIV RNA <50 copies/mL by week 30 and no previous virologic failure (VF; defined as failure to achieve HIV RNA <400 copies/mL or confirmed rebound after achieving HIV RNA ≥400 copies/mL). Three hundred sixty-nine subjects who completed 84 weeks in ARIES participated in the extension phase and maintained their randomized regimen for an additional 60 weeks post randomization.Results: At week 144, 146/189 (77%) versus 132/180 (73%) subjects in the unboosted ATV and ATV/r groups, respectively, maintained HIV RNA <50 copies/mL. Post randomization (weeks 36-144), treatment-related grade 2x–4 adverse events were more common in the ATV/r-treated (23%) compared to the ATV-treated (13%) group; the most frequently reported was increased serum bilirubin (6% of ATV-treated subjects vs 14 % of ATV/r-treated subjects). During the extension phase, 3% (11/369) of subjects met protocol-defined VF (5 ATV-treated and 6 ATV/ r-treated subjects); one ATV/r-treated subject had treatment-emergent major viral resistance-associated mutations. The median change in fasting triglycerides from baseline to week 144 was significantly different (P=.001) in the ATV-treated (-8.5 mg/dL) compared to the ATV/r-treated (28.5 mg/dL) groups.Conclusions: These long-term study results demonstrate that ATV in combination with ABC/3TC is a potent, well-tolerated regimen in patients who have achieved initial suppression on a ritonavir-boosted regimen.     

Steady-State Amprenavir,Tenofovir, and Emtricitabine Pharmacokinetics Before and After Reducing Ritonavir Boosting of a Fosamprenavir/Tenofovir/Emtricitabine Regimen from 200 mg to 100 mg Once Daily (TELEX II)

Abstract

Purpose: Evaluate how reducing ritonavir (RTV) boosting from 200 mg to 100 mg once daily (QD) affects steady-state pharmacokinetics of components of a fosamprenavir (FPV)-based regimen. Methods: Prospective, open-label, pharmacokinetic study in 12 HIV-infected patients stabilized on FPV/RTV 1400 mg/200 mg + tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)/emtricitabine (FTC) 300 mg/200 mg QD (TELEX II). Pharmacokinetics were assessed by noncompartmental analysis at baseline and 4 weeks after RTV reduction to 100 mg QD. Results: Baseline median minimum plasma concentration (C_min) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over 24 hours post dose (AUC_24h) were as follows: APV: 1,708 ng/mL, 84,260 h ? ng/mL; tenofovir: 53 ng/mL, 2,420 h ? ng/mL; FTC: 58 ng/mL, 9,190 h ? ng/mL; RTV: 80 ng/mL, 10,230 h ? ng/mL. Four weeks after reducing RTV, changes in C_min and AUC_24h were: APV: +26%, +0.6%; tenofovir: +77%, +30%; FTC: +188%, +13%; RTV –64%, –79%. Component plasma concentration ranges were consistent with historical values. Median APV C_min was 14.7-fold above the protein-binding-adjusted 50% inhibitory concentration of wild-type HIV. Four weeks after RTV reduction, HIV-1 RNA levels remained <50 copies/mL in all patients, median CD4+ count increased from 465 to 495 cells/mm³, and favorable lipid changes and no adverse events were observed. Conclusion: Reducing RTV boosting from 200 to 100 mg QD of FPV/TDF/FTC QD conferred no detrimental effect on APV, tenofovir, FTC, or RTV pharmacokinetics and maintained virologic suppression.     

Dose-finding study of once-daily indinavir/ritonavir plus zidovudine and lamivudine in HIV-infected patients

BACKGROUND: Strategies for treatment of HIV need to be considered in terms of combining potency, safety, and convenience of dosage. However, regimens including once-daily protease inhibitors are not yet available. We have performed a pilot study to determine an indinavir/ritonavir (IND/RTV) regimen for once-daily dosing, by monitoring plasma levels. METHODS: Antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected adults were eligible. Therapy was zidovudine/lamivudine 1 pill twice daily plus IND/RIT (liquid formulation) 800/100 mg twice daily with food. At 4-week intervals, plasma levels were measured and dosage of IND/RIT switched to 1000/100 mg daily and then 800/200 mg daily. If 12-hour minimum concentrations (Cmin12h) of IND were too low (<0.1 microg/ml) with IND/RIT 1000/100 mg once daily in the first half of the patients, it was planned to switch directly to 800/200 mg once daily in the other half. RESULTS: In all, 27 patients were recruited. Mean baseline CD4+ lymphocyte count was 107 x 106/L (range, 4-623 x 106/L). Eleven patients (40%) discontinued the study medication within the first 4 weeks due to clinical progression (n = 3) or grade 1-2 RTV related side effects (n = 8). Nine patients (group A) switched from 800/100 mg twice daily to 1000/100 mg once daily and then to 800/200 mg once daily. Seven patients (group B) switched directly to 800/200 mg once daily. At week 32, viral load was <5 copies/ml in 15 of 16 patients (94%). RTV levels were always <2.1 microg/ml. The mean and 95% confidence interval for IND Cmin and Cmax in microg/ml was: using IND/RTV 800/100 mg twice daily (n = 16) 1.4 (0.5-2.3) and 6.7 (4.4-9.1), respectively; using IND/RTV 1000/100 mg once daily (n = 9) 0.18 (0-0.41) and 8.6 (3.3-14), respectively; and using 800/200 mg once daily (n = 16) 0.38 (0-0.9), and 7.5 (0.8-14.8). For all 16 patients who received IND/RTV 800/100 mg twice daily, the Cmin value for IND was >/=0.1 microg/ml. Conversely, IND Cmin was <0.1 microg/ml in 4 of 9 receiving 1000/100 mg once daily but in only 1 of 16 receiving 800/200 mg once daily. CONCLUSION: Once-daily regimen of IND/RIT is feasible and deserves further evaluation in larger randomized trials. Liquid formulation of RIT was not well tolerated by our antiretroviral-naive patients despite lower than suggested doses.