Sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar fusion. A study with anesthetic blocks

Low back pain persisting or appearing after a technically successful lumbar fusion challenges clinicians. In this context, the sacroiliac joint could be a possible source of pain, but the frequency of its responsibility is not really known. We used sacroiliac anesthetic blocks, the gold standard for diagnosis, to determine this frequency. Our second goal was to search predictive factors for a positive block. Our prospective series consisted of 40 patients with persistent low back pain after a technically successful fusion who received a sacroiliac anesthetic block under fluoroscopic control. The diagnostic criterion was a relief of more than 75% of the pain on a visual analog scale. We found a 35% rate of positive blocks. The only criterion that characterized these patients was a postoperative pain different from the preoperative pain in its distribution ( p =0.017). A free interval of more than 3 months between surgery and appearance of the pain had an indicative value ( p =0.17). An increased uptake in the sacroiliac on bone scintigraphy or a past history of posterior iliac bone-graft harvesting had no significant value ( p =0.74 and p =1.0, respectively). The sacroiliac joint is a possible source of pain after lumbar fusion. The anesthetic block under fluoroscopic control remains the gold standard.     

Low back pain and its relation to the hip and foot

STUDY DESIGN: Case study. OBJECTIVE: To describe a treatment approach for a patient with recurrent low back pain who also had asymmetry in hip rotation between the left and right sides. BACKGROUND: The patient's chief complaint was dull, intermittent unilateral low back pain during the past 3 years. METHODS AND MEASURES: The patients was a 35-year-old man with recurrent unilateral low back pain. The findings of the physical therapy examination suggested sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Also, evaluation later showed evidence of unilateral excessive foot pronation on the same side of the excessive hip lateral rotation. The finding of excessive hip lateral rotation and excessive foot pronation on the same side of the unilateral low back pain suggested a possible connection between low back symptoms, hip, and lower extremity dysfunction. RESULTS: The treatment of the hip and the subtalar joint of the foot eliminated the reoccurrence of the patients signs and symptoms of sacroiliac joint dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: This case report demonstrates the successful treatment of a patient with low back pain who exhibited multiple impairments in the sacroiliac, hip, and subtalar joints.     

The role of sacroiliac joint dysfunction in the genesis of low back pain: the obvious is not always right

Background context It is a common practice to the link low back pain with protruding disc even when neurological signs are absent. Because pain caused by sacroiliac joint dysfunction can mimic discogenic or radicular low back pain, we assumed that the diagnosis of sacroiliac joint dysfunction is frequently overlooked. Purpose To assess the incidence of sacroiliac joint dysfunction in patients with low back pain and positive disc findings on CT scan or MRI, but without claudication or objective neurological deficits. Methods Fifty patients with low back pain and disc herniation, without claudication or neurological abnormalities such as decreased motor strength, sensory alterations or sphincter incontinence and with positive pain provocation tests for sacroiliac joint dysfunction were submitted to fluoroscopic diagnostic sacroiliac joint infiltration. Results The mean baseline VAS pain score was 7.8 ± 1.77 (range 5–10). Thirty minutes after infiltration, the mean VAS score was 1.3 ± 1.76 (median 0.000E+00 with an average deviation from median = 1.30) (P = 0.0002). Forty-six patients had a VAS score ranging from 0 to 3, 8 weeks after the fluoroscopic guided infiltration. There were no serious complications after treatment. An unanticipated motor block that required hospitalization was seen in four patients, lasting from 12 to 36 h. Conclusions Sacroiliac joint dysfunction should be considered strongly in the differential diagnosis of low back pain in this group of patients.     

Sacroiliac joint pain

The sacroiliac joint is a source of pain in the lower back and buttocks in approximately 15% of the population. Diagnosing sacroiliac joint-mediated pain is difficult because the presenting complaints are similar to those of other causes of back pain. Patients with sacroiliac joint-mediated pain rarely report pain above L5; most localize their pain to the area around the posterior superior iliac spine. Radiographic and laboratory tests primarily help exclude other sources of low back pain. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and bone scans of the sacroiliac joint cannot reliably determine whether the joint is the source of the pain. Controlled analgesic injections of the sacroiliac joint are the most important tool in the diagnosis. Treatment modalities include medications, physical therapy, bracing, manual therapy, injections, radiofrequency denervation, and arthrodesis; however, no published prospective data compare the efficacy of these modalities.     

Computed tomographic findings in patients with persistent sacroiliac pain after posterior iliac graft harvesting

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study of 24 sacroiliac joint computed tomographic (CT) scans of patients with persistent donor site pain. OBJECTIVE: To illustrate the computed tomographic findings of sacroiliac joints in patients who underwent posterior iliac bone graft harvesting with subsequent persistent donor site pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In a previous study the posterior iliac bone harvesting site was divided into three zones. Zone 1 carried no risk of violation of the synovial part of the sacroiliac joint. In Zones 2 and 3 there was a potential risk of violation to the synovial part of the sacroiliac joint. There is no study in the literature on the effect of violating the different parts of the sacroiliac joint during posterior iliac bone graft harvesting. METHODS: Computed tomographic scans of the sacroiliac joints of 22 patients with persistent pain in 24 sacroiliac joints after posterior iliac bone graft harvesting were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Of the 16 sacroiliac joints with evidence of disruption of the inner table at the ligamentous part, 10 showed mild degenerative changes, and 6 showed moderate changes. Three joints with evidence of disruption of the inner table at the synovial part showed severe degenerative changes. Five joints with no evidence of inner table disruption did not show degenerative changes. CONCLUSION: There is a high prevalence of inner table disruption in patients with persistent sacroiliac joint pain after posterior iliac bone graft harvesting. The computed tomographic scan showed that involvement of the synovial part caused more severe degenerative changes than involvement of the ligamentous part.     

Randomized Placebo-controlled Study Evaluating Lateral Branch Radiofrequency Denervation for Sacroiliac Joint Pain

Background: Sacroiliac joint pain is a challenging condition accounting for approximately 20% of cases of chronic low back pain. Currently, there are no effective long-term treatment options for sacroiliac joint pain.

Methods: A randomized placebo-controlled study was conducted in 28 patients with injection-diagnosed sacroiliac joint pain. Fourteen patients received L4-L5 primary dorsal rami and S1-S3 lateral branch radiofrequency denervation using cooling-probe technology after a local anesthetic block, and 14 patients received the local anesthetic block followed by placebo denervation. Patients who did not respond to placebo injections crossed over and were treated with radiofrequency denervation using conventional technology.

Results: One, 3, and 6 months after the procedure, 11 (79%), 9 (64%), and 8 (57%) radiofrequency-treated patients experienced pain relief of 50% or greater and significant functional improvement. In contrast, only 2 patients (14%) in the placebo group experienced significant improvement at their 1-month follow-up, and none experienced benefit 3 months after the procedure. In the crossover group (n = 11), 7 (64%), 6 (55%), and 4 (36%) experienced improvement 1, 3, and 6 months after the procedure. One year after treatment, only 2 patients (14%) in the treatment group continued to demonstrate persistent pain relief.     

42例腰椎融合术后难治性下腰痛的治疗体会

目的探讨腰椎融合术后骶髂关节病变的特点及治疗方法与疗效。方法回顾性分析42例因腰椎退变性滑脱、腰椎椎间盘突出、腰椎椎管狭窄曾行后路减压、后外侧或椎体间植骨融合及椎弓根内固定术,术后随访12～72个月(平均42.6个月)出现新的难治性持续性下腰痛症状的病例。本研究运用骶髂关节内封闭进行诊断性治疗。阳性标准:疼痛缓解≥75%,采用疼痛视觉模拟量表(visual analogue scale,VAS)进行定量分析。结果阳性12例(28.57%),是否融合L5/S1、术后疼痛缓解期是否≥3个月与诊断阳性率相关,有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论腰椎融合术后下腰痛部分可能是由骶髂关节病变引起的,L5/S1融合可能促进骶髂关节发生退变。症状以下腰痛症状为主者,手术应慎重。     

Poor outcome following bilateral sacroiliac joint fusion for degenerative sacroiliac joint syndrome

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcome of bilateral sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fusion, using a new technique, in patients with a chronic SIJ syndrome. Seventeen patients with chronic low back pain, with a positive response to specific diagnostic tests for the SIJ, were considered candidates for bilateral sacroiliac fusion. The surgical indication was based on the results of local anaesthetic joint infiltration, temporary external fixation or bone scan. Ten patients had had previous surgery on the lumbar spine. Bilateral posterior SIJ fusion was performed with internal fixation and decortication of the sacroiliac joint, using a separate approach to each joint. Local bone grafting was performed. At the time of follow-up (on average 39 months after surgery), 3 patients reported moderate or absent pain, 8 marked pain and 6 severe pain. Seven patients showed a symptomatic non-union; union occurred in only 6 cases. Eighteen percent of the patients were satisfied, but in the other 82% the results were not acceptable. Reoperation was performed in 65% of the patients. Our results with bilateral posterior SIJ fusion were disappointing, which may be related with difficulties in patient selection, as well as with surgical technique. Better diagnostic procedures and possibly other surgical techniques might provide more predictable results, but this remains to be demonstrated.     

Computed tomography findings in patients with sacroiliac pain

This retrospective study evaluated the diagnostic value of computed tomography in patients with sacroiliac pain. Computed tomography scans of the sacroiliac joints of 62 patients with sacroiliac joint pain were reviewed. The criteria to include the patient in the current study were pain relief after a local injection in the sacroiliac joint under computed tomography guidance, a physical examination consistent with a sacroiliac origin of the pain, and negative magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine. A control group consisted of 50 patients of matched age who had computed tomography scans of the pelvis for a reason other than pelvic or back pain. Computed tomography scans showed one or more findings in 57.5% and 31% of the sacroiliac joints in the symptomatic and the control groups, respectively. The computed tomography scans were negative in 37 (42.5%) symptomatic sacroiliac joints with a positive sacroiliac joint injection test. The sensitivity of computed tomography was 57.5 % and its specificity was 69%. The finding of the current study suggests limited diagnostic value of computed tomography in sacroiliac joint disease because of its low sensitivity and specificity. With clinical suspicion of a sacroiliac origin of pain, intraarticular injection is currently the only means to confirm that diagnosis.     

CT引导经皮置钉治疗病理性骶髂关节疼痛

目的：探讨在CT引导下经皮微创技术置入空心拉力螺钉治疗病理性骶髂关节疼痛。方法：骶髂关节转移肿瘤患者8例，男4例，女4例；年龄12～83岁，平均53岁。单侧转移5例，双侧3例。肺癌2例，乳腺癌1例，卵巢癌1例，非霍奇金淋巴瘤1例，横纹肌肉瘤1例，骨髓瘤1例，前列腺癌1例。试行在CT引导下经皮微创技术置入空心拉力螺钉稳定病理性骶髂关节不稳。术前和术后通过Ennek—ing疼痛评分进行比较。结果：8例均获随访，随访时间4个月～29个月，平均18．2个月。均1周内疼痛缓解，无并发症发生，3例术后6个月内死亡，余5例疼痛明显减轻。结论：CT引导下经皮置入空心拉力螺钉能有效缓解病理性骶髂关节不稳所致的疼痛。     

Absence de fiabilité des tests cliniques et des blocs pour le diagnostic positif de l’origine sacro-iliaque d’une douleur

Mapping studies of pain elicited by injections into the sacroiliac joints (SIJs) suggest that sacroiliac joint syndrome (SIJS) may manifest as low back pain, sciatica, or trochanteric pain. Neither patient-reported symptoms nor provocative SIJ maneuvers are sensitive or specific for SIJS when SIJ block is used as the diagnostic gold standard. This has led to increasing diagnostic use of SIJ block, a procedure in which an anesthetic is injected into the joint under arthrographic guidance. However, several arguments cast doubt on the validity of SIJ block as a diagnostic gold standard. Thus, the effects of two consecutive blocks are identical in only 60% of cases, and the anesthetic diffuses out of the joint in 61% of cases, often coming into contact with the sheaths of the adjacent nerve trunks or roots, including the lumbosacral trunk (which may contribute to pain in the groin or thigh) and the L5 and S1 nerve roots. These data partly explain the limited specificity of SIJ block for the diagnosis of SIJS and the discordance between the pain elicited by the arthrography injection and the response to the block. The limitations of provocative maneuvers and SIJ blocks may stem in part from a contribution of extraarticular ligaments to the genesis of pain believed to originate within the SIJs. These ligaments include the expansion of the iliolumbar ligaments, the dorsal and ventral sacroiliac ligaments, the sacrospinous ligaments, and the sacrotuberous ligaments (sacroiliac joint lato-sensu). They play a role in locking or in allowing motion of the SIJs. Glucocorticoids may diffuse better than anesthetics within these ligaments. Furthermore, joint fusion may result in ligament unloading.     

Lateral branch blocks as a treatment for sacroiliac joint pain: A pilot study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pain arising from the sacroiliac (SI) joint is a common cause of low back pain for which there is no universally accepted, long-term treatment. Previous studies have shown radiofrequency (RF) procedures to be an effective treatment for other types of spinal pain. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of reducing SI joint pain by percutaneous RF lesioning of the nerves innervating the SI joint. METHODS: Eighteen patients with confirmed SI joint pain underwent nerve blocks of the L4-5 primary dorsal rami and S1-3 lateral branches innervating the affected joint. Those who obtained 50% or greater pain relief from these blocks proceeded to undergo RF denervation of the nerves. RESULTS: Thirteen of 18 patients who underwent L4-5 dorsal rami and S1-3 lateral branch blocks (LBB) obtained significant pain relief, with 2 patients reporting prolonged benefit. At their next visit, 9 patients who experienced >50% pain relief underwent RF lesioning of the nerves. Eight of 9 patients (89%) obtained >/=50% pain relief from this procedure that persisted at their 9-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with SI joint pain who respond to L4-5 dorsal rami and S1-3 LBB, RF denervation of these nerves appears to be an effective treatment. Randomized, controlled trials are needed to further evaluate this procedure.     

Detection of sacroiliac injury by bone scanning in fractures of the pelvis and its clinical significance

Fifteen patients with stable pelvic fractures were investigated by technetium bone scanning of the pelvis and subsequently reviewed to study their recovery from this injury. Eleven of these patients had a significantly raised uptake of isotope over the ipsilateral sacroiliac joint suggesting a bone injury in this region, probably as a result of micro-avulsion fractures. All patients, with one exception, made a full recovery from their fractures within 4 months.

We conclude from this that the region of the sacroiliac joint is frequently injured in isolated fractures of the pubic rami, but in the short term this has a good prognosis.     

Single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) scan–positive facet joints and other spinal structures in a hospital-wide population with spinal pain

Background contextThe current criterion standard for zygapophyseal (facet) joint pain diagnosis is placebo-controlled triple comparative local anesthetic facet joint or medial branch blocks. Single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) scanning is a less invasive modality that has been widely used in patients with spinal pain for the diagnosis of facet joint arthritis. Previous studies have shown that SPECT results correlate well with response to facet joints steroid injections.PurposeTo evaluate the prevalence of SPECT scan–positive facet joints and other spinal areas in different age groups in a hospital-wide population with spinal pain.Study designRetrospective study.MethodsThis study included 534 patients who underwent a SPECT scan for spinal pain over 7.5 years in our hospital. All referrals from all doctors for any cervical or lumbar spinal pain were included, and the results were reviewed.ResultsA total of 486 patients (91.1%) had at least one positive abnormality on SPECT scan; 81.3% had increased uptake in different structures and regions of the spine. This included 42.8% increased uptake in the facet joint 29.8% in the vertebral bodies/end plates, and 5.9% in sacroiliac joints. The prevalence of increased uptake in the lumbosacral and cervical spine was 44% and 37%, respectively. When patients were divided into five age groups (below 40, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69, and 70 years and older), there was a significantly higher increased prevalence in advancing age groups.ConclusionsIn a hospital-wide population with spinal pain, there is a 42.88% prevalence of increased uptake in the facet joint on SPECT. The incidence increases significantly with advancing age. SPECT can play a role in investigating patients with spinal pain.     

Provocative sacroiliac joint maneuvers and sacroiliac joint block are unreliable for diagnosing sacroiliac joint pain

Mapping studies of pain elicited by injections into the sacroiliac joints (SIJs) suggest that sacroiliac joint syndrome (SIJS) may manifest as low back pain, sciatica, or trochanteric pain. Neither patient-reported symptoms nor provocative SIJ maneuvers are sensitive or specific for SIJS when SIJ block is used as the diagnostic gold standard. This has led to increasing diagnostic use of SIJ block, a procedure in which an anesthetic is injected into the joint under arthrographic guidance. However, several arguments cast doubt on the validity of SIJ block as a diagnostic gold standard. Thus, the effects of two consecutive blocks are identical in only 60% of cases, and the anesthetic diffuses out of the joint in 61% of cases, often coming into contact with the sheaths of the adjacent nerve trunks or roots, including the lumbosacral trunk (which may contribute to pain in the groin or thigh) and the L5 and S1 nerve roots. These data partly explain the limited specificity of SIJ block for the diagnosis of SIJS and the discordance between the pain elicited by the arthrography injection and the response to the block. The limitations of provocative maneuvers and SIJ blocks may stem in part from a contribution of extraarticular ligaments to the genesis of pain believed to originate within the SIJs. These ligaments include the expansion of the iliolumbar ligaments, the dorsal and ventral sacroiliac ligaments, the sacrospinous ligaments, and the sacrotuberous ligaments (sacroiliac joint lato-sensu). They play a role in locking or in allowing motion of the SIJs. Glucocorticoids may diffuse better than anesthetics within these ligaments. Furthermore, joint fusion may result in ligament unloading.     

CT引导下经皮空心拉力螺钉固定治疗骶髂关节损伤

目的:探讨CT引导下经皮空心钛合金拉力螺钉内固定治疗骶髂关节损伤的临床疗效。方法:骶髂关节损伤患者36例,其中男26例,女10例;年龄19~68岁,平均35岁。ISS评分平均19分。按Tile分类:B1型6例,B2型16例,B3型4例;C1型4例,C2型3例,C3型3例。入院至手术时间平均5d。采用CT引导下经皮空心钛合金拉力螺钉内固定术治疗,硬膜外麻醉下共置入48枚空心钛合金拉力螺钉。结果:手术时间30~110min,平均42min;术中失血10~35ml,平均18ml。1例因肺功能障碍延迟手术,1例行开颅术,死于多脏器衰竭。术后随访3~27个月,平均17.9个月。依据骨盆创伤治疗标准,影像学评价优29例,良6例,差1例;临床评价优23例,良13例。并发症包括轻度下腰痛1例、骶尾部痛1例。结论:CT引导下经皮空心钛合金拉力螺钉内固定治疗骶髂关节损伤,置钉精确,安全有效,并发症少。     

An electrophysiologic study of mechanoreceptors in the sacroiliac joint and adjacent tissues

STUDY DESIGN: The somatosensory afferent units in the sacroiliac joint of an animal model were investigated using an electrophysiologic technique. OBJECTIVES: To identify the mechanosensitive receptive fields in the sacroiliac joint, and to determine their distribution and characteristics. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The sacroiliac joint is considered to be a source of lower back pain. Although there have been clinical studies on the diagnosis of sacroiliac joint pain, no satisfactory diagnostic method other than joint blocks has been reported. It still is not clear whether the sacroiliac joints actually transmit pain to the central nervous system. The sensory innervation of the sacroiliac joint has not been fully characterized neurophysiologically. METHODS: Experiments were performed on 10 adult cats weighing 2.6 to 4 kg. The animals were anesthetized with intravenous sodium pentobarbital. An L4-L7 laminectomy was performed. The L4-L6 dorsal roots were cut at their proximal ends, split, and draped over a bipolar recording electrode. Glass probes were used to search the sacroiliac joint and adjacent tissues for mechanosensitive units. When units were identified, they were stimulated electrically to obtain conduction velocities and by Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments to determine mechanical thresholds. RESULTS: In the sacroiliac joint and adjacent muscles, 29 discrete mechanosensitive units were identified. Of these 29 units, 26 were found in the posterior sacroiliac ligament and the remaining 3 in the adjacent muscles. Also, 16 units (55%) were identified in the proximal third of the sacroiliac joint. Conduction velocities of the units ranged from 3.1 to 22 m/second (average, 9.2 m/second), and 26 units were group III. Mechanical thresholds of the units ranged from 4.6 to 164.3 g (average, 69.7 g). Whereas 28 units (96.6%) had thresholds higher than 7 g, one unit (3.4%) had a threshold lower than 7 g. CONCLUSIONS: Group III units with mechanical thresholds higher than 7 g may serve as nociceptors, and units with thresholds of lower than 7 g may serve as proprioceptors. The current study showed that most of the units in the sacroiliac joint were high-threshold group III units that perhaps had a nociceptive function. This result suggests that the sacroiliac joint may be a source of lower back pain in humans. This study also showed that the sacroiliac joint has little proprioceptive function.     

Functional and radiographic outcome of sacroiliac arthrodesis for the disorders of the sacroiliac joint.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The sacroiliac joint is known to be a possible cause of chronic low back pain, but the diagnosis and treatment of disorders of the sacroiliac joint have been difficult and controversial. PURPOSE: To describe the outcome of sacroiliac joint arthrodesis for sacroiliac joint disorders, with the hypothesis that sacroiliac arthrodesis leads to improved postoperative function. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Consecutive case series performed in an academic medical institution. PATIENT SAMPLE: The patient population consisted of 20 patients undergoing sacroiliac joint arthrodesis between December 1994 and December 2001. Patients undergoing concomitant procedures at the time of sacroiliac joint arthrodesis were excluded. The 3 men and 17 women in the study group had an average age of 45.1 years (range 21.8-66.4 years), a mean duration of symptoms of 2.6 years (range 0.5-8.0 years), and a mean follow-up period of 5.8 years (range 2.0-9.0 years). OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures included general health and function, clinical evaluation, and radiographic assessment. METHODS: For all 20 patients, nonoperative treatment had failed, and for all, the diagnosis was confirmed by pain relief with intraarticular sacroiliac joint injections under fluoroscopic guidance. Sacroiliac joint arthrodesis (via a modified Smith-Petersen technique) was recommended only when a positive response to the injection was noted, and patients had recurrence of symptoms after the initial positive response. Preoperative and postoperative general health and function were assessed via the 36-item Short-Form (SF-36) Health Survey and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Modems Instrument, which were collected prospectively. Medical records and plain radiographs were reviewed retrospectively to determine the clinical and radiographic outcome. RESULTS: Multiple etiologies of sacroiliac symptoms were observed: sacroiliac joint dysfunction (13 patients), osteoarthritis (5 patients), and spondyloarthropathy and sacroiliac joint instability (1 each). Seventeen patients (85%) had solid fusion. Fifteen patients (75%) completed preoperative and postoperative SF-36 forms. Significant (p< or =.05) improvement occurred in the following categories: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, role emotional, and neurogenic and pain indices. Improvement (not statistically significant) was also noted in general and mental health. CONCLUSIONS: For carefully selected patients, sacroiliac arthrodesis appears to be a safe, well-tolerated, and successful procedure, leading to significant improvement in functional outcome and a high fusion rate. To the authors' knowledge, the current report is the largest series to document the functional and radiographic outcome of sacroiliac joint arthrodesis.     

Interexaminer reliability of three methods of combining test results to determine side of sacral restriction, sacral base position, and innominate bone position

CONTEXT: Sacroiliac joint dysfunction is diagnosed based on the combined results of several palpatory examinations. Previous studies have compared the interexaminer reliability of only one of these methods of diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: To compare the interexaminer reliability of three methods of combining palpatory examinations to determine the side of sacroiliac joint dysfunction, sacral base position, and innominate bone position. DESIGN: Blinded single-cohort reliability study. METHODS: Patients with low back pain underwent two identical sets of palpatory examinations given by two physicians, separately, at a university spine center. The results of each set were compiled and interpreted by three methods: using the test result with the highest interexaminer reliability (method 1), requiring at least one test result to be abnormal for the variable to be abnormal (method 2), and requiring all test results to be abnormal for the variable to be abnormal (method 3). The kappa was calculated for each method. RESULTS: There were 24 subjects (mean age, 68.3 years), of which 15 (62%) were women. The kappa was consistently higher with method 1, at 0.47, 0.08, and 0.32 for the sacral position, innominate bone position, and side of sacroiliac joint dysfunction, respectively. Corresponding values for method 2 were 0.09, 0.4, and 0.16, and for method 3 were 0.16, 0.1, and -0.33. CONCLUSION: Using the results of the most reliable examination consistently has the best interexaminer reliability.