Adrenal suppression with dry powder formulations of fluticasone propionate and mometasone furoate

Mometasone furoate (MF) and fluticasone propionate (FP) are high potency inhaled corticosteroids. The systemic bioavailability of MF is claimed to be negligible, leading to a minimal potential for systemic adverse effects. We assessed the overnight urinary cortisol/creatinine as the primary outcome of adrenal suppression in 21 patients with persistent asthma (mean FEV1 = 91%). Patients were randomized in a crossover fashion to receive 2 weekly consecutive doubling incremental doses of either FP Accuhaler (500, 1,000, and 2,000 microg/day) or MF Twisthaler (400, 800, and 1,600 microg/day). For the 21 per protocol completed patients, there was significant suppression of overnight urinary cortisol/creatinine with high and medium doses of both drugs-as geometric mean fold suppression (95% confidence interval) from baseline: FP 2,000 microg, 1.85 (1.21-2.82, p = 0.002); FP 1,000 microg, 1.45 (1.07-1.96, p = 0.02); MF 1,600 microg, 1.92 (1.26-2.93, p = 0.001); and MF 800 microg, 1.39 (1.04-1.88, p = 0.02). For secondary outcomes of 8:00 A.M. plasma cortisol, serum osteocalcin, and early morning urinary cortisol/creatinine, there was significant suppression with MF and FP at the highest dose. Our data refute the assertion that MF has negligible systemic bioavailability and a lower potential for systemic adverse effects compared with FP.     

Therapeutic ratio of inhaled corticosteroids in adult asthma. A dose-range comparison between fluticasone propionate and budesonide, measuring their effect on bronchial hyperresponsiveness and adrenal cortex function

Inhaled corticosteroids have become the mainstay treatment of bronchial asthma. However, simultaneous evaluations of efficacy and side effects are few. This study aimed to compare the relative effect of fluticasone propionate (FP) and budesonide (BUD) on bronchial responsiveness and endogenous cortisol secretion in adults with asthma. The study was double-blind and included 66 adults with asthma, who were randomized to FP (n = 33) or BUD (n = 33). Prestudy, all participants were clinically stable, using inhaled corticosteroids and hyperresponsive to methacholine. Eligible patients were randomized to three consecutive 2-wk periods with either FP 250 microg twice daily, FP 500 microg twice daily, and FP 1,000 microg twice daily, or BUD 400 microg twice daily, BUD 800 microg twice daily, and BUD 1,600 microg twice daily, delivered by Diskhaler and Turbuhaler, respectively. Before randomization and at the end of each treatment, bronchial methacholine PD(20), 24-h urinary cortisol excretion (24-h UC), plasma cortisol, serum osteocalcin, and blood eosinophils were determined. The relative PD(20) potency between FP and BUD was 2.51 (95% CI, 1.05-5.99; p < 0. 05), while the relative 24-h UC potency was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.44-0.83; p < 0.01). The differential therapeutic ratio (FP/BUD) based on PD(20) potency and 24-h UC was 4.18 (95% CI, 1.16-15.03; p < 0.05). The difference in systemic potency was also seen for plasma cortisol, serum osteocalcin, and blood eosinophils. Therapeutic ratio over a wide dose range, determined by impact on bronchial responsiveness and endogenous corticosteroid production, seems to favor FP.     

A double-blind, placebo-controlled steroid-sparing study with budesonide Turbuhaler in Japanese oral steroid-dependent asthma patients. Japanese Pulmicort Turbuhaler study group

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the oral steroid-sparing capacity of budesonide Turbuhaler. METHODOLOGY: One hundred and thirteen oral steroid-dependent patients were treated for 6 months with placebo or budesonide 800 microg or 1600 microg daily. Every second week the oral steroid dose was reduced if asthma control permitted. RESULTS: The reductions in oral steroid doses were 9, 35 and 60% in the placebo and budesonide 800 microg and 1600 microg groups, respectively. Oral steroid treatment could be discontinued in 4% (placebo), 15% (800 microg) and 23% (1600 microg). Mean peak expiratory flow values increased by 21 and 24 L/min in the budesonide groups but decreased by 6 L/min in the placebo group. Asthma attack, activity and sleep scores remained unchanged showing maintained efficacy. Plasma cortisol levels increased and an adrenocorticotropic hormone test showed improved adrenocortical response in both budesonide groups, indicating improved safety. Adverse drug reactions were infrequent and mild in all study groups. CONCLUSION: Budesonide Turbuhaler, 800 microg and 1600 microg daily, resulted in a significant reduction in oral steroid usage in steroid-dependent patients. The effect was achieved with maintained asthma control together with improvements in lung and adrenal functions.     

Comparison of high and low dose of the inhaled steroid, budesonide, as an initial treatment in newly detected asthma

The importance of early initiation of inhaled steroids even in mild asthma has been documented in several studies. It is not, however, clear whether the treatment should be started with a high or a low dose of the inhaled steroid. We have compared the effects of high and low dose inhaled steroid, budesonide, in patients with newly detected asthma. We studied 101 adult patients with newly detected bronchial asthma who were without inhaled steroid or any regular pharmacological treatment for their asthma. The patients were randomly allocated to two treatment groups: one to receive 800 microg inhaled budesonide per day and the other to receive 200 microg inhaled budesonide per day. The drugs were given with a Turbuhaler dry powder inhaler. During the 3-month treatment period, no significant differences between the treatment groups were noted in morning or evening PEF values, in spirometric parameters, in asthmatic symptoms or in the use of rescue beta2-agonists. The decrease in bronchial hyperresponsiveness was, however, more marked in the high dose budesonide group, reaching a borderline significance (P=0.10 high vs. low dose budesonide). In addition, in serum markers of asthmatic inflammation significant differences were shown between the treatment groups. The decrease in the number of blood eosinophils during the treatment was more marked in the high dose budesonide group (P=0.02; high vs. low dose budesonide). In serum ECP no change was observed in the low dose budesonide group, but a marked decrease in the high-dose budesonide group (P=0.008; high vs. low dose budesonide). The change was even more marked with regard to serum EPX (P=0.005; high vs. low dose budesonide). Our results support the view that the treatment of newly detected asthma should be started with a high dose of inhaled steroid. The low dose may not be enough to suppress asthmatic inflammation despite good clinical primary response.     

Dysfonctionnement nasal chronique et obstruction des voies aériennes périphériques

Allergic rhinitis often occur at the same time with many upper and lower airway diseases in which there is asthma. Many patients without clinical asthma may have an asymptomatic bronchial hyperreactivity and an allergic rhinitis at the same time. An overview of these actual knowledges is done including clinical, respiratory functional explorations, therapeutic studies, as well as those observed in chronic nasal dysfunctions (allergic or non allergic eosinophilic rhinitis, nasal polyposis, chronic rhinitis).Objectives. – The aim of this study is to determine bronchial hyperresponsiveness of a chronic nasal dysfunction population having allergic or non allergic rhinitis.Material and methods. – Retrospective study of respiratory functional explorations (using a methacholine provocation test) among non asthmatic patients consulting for rhinology-allergy diseases but with broncho-pulmonary symptomatology.Results. – It has been observed an allergic rhinitis population without upper bronchial hyperreactivity but with a small airway obstruction revealed or worsened during the methacholine bronchoprovocation test.Conclusion. – Chronic nasal dysfunction and small airway obstruction are correlated. This association shows an airway inflammation from the nose through the small bronchi. As upper bronchial hyperreactivity can precede asthma, a small airway obstruction could precede a bronchial hyperreactivity. Nasal chronic dysfunction treatment could act upon small airway obstruction, or central bronchial hyperreactivity or asthma appearance.     

Effect of budesonide on the perception of induced airway narrowing in subjects with asthma.

The perception of bronchoconstriction may be modulated by airway inflammation. However, the effect of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) treatment on perception in subjects with asthma has received limited study. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of inhaled budesonide on the perception of breathlessness induced by histamine challenge. Thirty-five subjects with poorly controlled asthma were randomized to receive budesonide (1,600 or 3,200 microg/d) for 8 wk, followed by 8 wk at 1,600 microg/d and subsequent downtitration according to a clinical algorithm. Borg scores were recorded during histamine challenges performed at baseline and at 8, 16, 24, 48, and 72 wk. Perception was estimated as the slope of Borg/% fall FEV(1). The Borg/FEV(1) slope increased significantly after 8 wk of budesonide (0.09 [0.08-0.12] to 0.15 [0.11-0.19], p = 0.002), and remained increased compared with baseline values at all subsequent visits. There were no significant differences in Borg/ FEV(1) slope between subjects who were and were not taking ICS at study entry. The magnitude of change in the Borg/FEV(1) slope did not differ significantly between treatment groups and was not related to changes in baseline FEV(1), airway hyperresponsiveness, blood eosinophils, or serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP). We conclude that treatment with budesonide enhances the perception of airway narrowing, but the effect is unrelated to budesonide dose, or to changes in circulating eosinophil markers.     

Determinants of the severity of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in patients with asthma.

AIM: In examining the mechanisms of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB), it is important to determine which factors most strongly affect the severity of EIB. We determined such factors in patients with asthma by stepwise multiple-regression analysis. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with asthma underwent pulmonary function tests, methacholine provocation test, and sputum induction. Eosinophilic inflammatory indices and airway vascular permeability index (ratio of albumin concentrations in induced sputum and serum) were examined in sputum samples, and then an exercise test was performed by all asthmatics. RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between the severity of EIB and degree of eosinophilic inflammation in induced sputum. Moreover, there was a significant correlation between the severity of EIB and airway vascular permeability index. Although we could not find a significant correlation between the severity of EIB and 1-sec forced expired volume, 20% provocation concentration of (PC20) methacholine tended to be correlated with the severity of EIB. By stepwise multiple-regression analysis, we also found that airway vascular permeability index, eosinophil cationic protein levels in sputum, and PC20 methacholine are independent predictors of the severity of EIB. CONCLUSION: We found that airway vascular hyperpermeability, eosinophilic inflammation, and bronchial hyperreactivity are independent factors predicting the severity of EIB.     

Determinants of the Severity of Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction in Patients with Asthma

Aim. In examining the mechanisms of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB), it is important to determine which factors most strongly affect the severity of EIB. We determined such factors in patients with asthma by stepwise multiple-regression analysis. Methods. Twenty-three patients with asthma underwent pulmonary function tests, methacholine provocation test, and sputum induction. Eosinophilic inflammatory indices and airway vascular permeability index (ratio of albumin concentrations in induced sputum and serum) were examined in sputum samples, and then an exercise test was performed by all asthmatics. Results. There was a significant correlation between the severity of EIB and degree of eosinophilic inflammation in induced sputum. Moreover, there was a significant correlation between the severity of EIB and airway vascular permeability index. Although we could not find a significant correlation between the severity of EIB and 1-sec forced expired volume, 20% provocation concentration of (PC₂₀) methacholine tended to be correlated with the severity of EIB. By stepwise multiple-regression analysis, we also found that airway vascular permeability index, eosinophil cationic protein levels in sputum, and PC₂₀ methacholine are independent predictors of the severity of EIB. Conclusion. We found that airway vascular hyperpermeability, eosinophilic inflammation, and bronchial hyperreactivity are independent factors predicting the severity of EIB.     

A double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-response study with budesonide Turbuhaler in Japanese asthma patients. Japanese Pulmicort Turbuhaler study group

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the dose-response for inhaled budesonide via Turbuhaler in Japanese patients with mild to moderate asthma. METHODOLOGY: Inhaled budesonide 100 microg, 200 microg, 400 microg or placebo was administered twice daily via Turbuhaler for 6 weeks, to 267 adult Japanese patients (mean age 51 years) with mild-to-moderate, non-steroid-dependent bronchial asthma, in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel group study. The patients had to be symptomatic for more than 3 days/week and have an average morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) 50-80% of predicted normal value. RESULTS: The response to budesonide was rapid, all treatments showing a significant improvement in morning PEF after 1 week (P<0.05). During week 6, mean improvements of 15, 45, 53 and 71 L/min were observed for the placebo, 200 microg, 400 microg and 800 microg budesonide groups, respectively. Compared with placebo all improvements in the budesonide groups were statistically significant and a significant dose-response was demonstrated (P<0.001). The difference between the 200 microg and 800 microg doses was significant. Also, for several secondary efficacy variables (e.g. evening PEF, symptom score, treatment score, daily activity score and sleep score) significant dose-responses were shown. Other variables included the investigators' assessments of improvement and usefulness. They also showed statistically significant dose-response relationships and confirmed the rapid onset of action. Budesonide was well tolerated at all tested doses, with a low incidence of adverse events, all of which were minor in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Budesonide Turbuhaler in the doses 100 microg to 400 microg twice daily was effective, well tolerated and showed a rapid onset of action in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma. Dose-response was demonstrated for several variables of clinical efficacy.     

Asthmatic bronchitis

Asthmatic bronchitis is a term that encompasses a large number of patients who generally smoke cigarettes and demonstrates chronic mucous hypersecretion and airway hyperreactivity. These patients are frequently labelled simply as asthmatic. In this setting, however, "asthma" is a nonspecific term applied to patients with a variety of symptoms. On the basis of history, bronchodilator response, and response to bronchoprovocating agents, it is frequently difficult to differentiate between groups of chronic bronchitics and asthmatics. Subjects with chronic bronchitis clearly demonstrate bronchial hyperreactivity to bronchoprovocating agents. This response does not appear to be due to an abnormality in bronchial smooth muscle. Chronic bronchitics may also respond to a variety of bronchodilating agents, again demonstrating the presence of bronchial hyperreactivity. Potential mechanisms for the observed bronchial hyperreactivity include reduced airway caliber, reduced resistance to airway narrowing, and airway inflammation. Airway inflammation may be the common link between airflow obstruction and airway hyperreactivity frequently seen in these patients. The finding of airway hyperreactivity in chronic bronchitis has implications far beyond simple therapeutic considerations and may lead to a better understanding of bronchial hyperreactivity under any circumstance.     

Randomized comparison of the efficacy and safety of ciclesonide and budesonide in adolescents with severe asthma

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of ciclesonide compared with budesonide in adolescents with severe asthma. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study, patients aged 12-17 years with severe asthma were treated with budesonide 400 microg once daily (QD) in a 2-week run-in period. At randomization, eligible patients were assigned 2:1 to ciclesonide 320 microg QD (ex-actuator) or budesonide 800 microg QD (metered dose), respectively, in the evening. Forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV(1)) was the primary variable. Patients recorded asthma symptom score and rescue medication use in diaries. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs) and 24-h urine cortisol. RESULTS: Four hundred and three patients were randomized. Ciclesonide 320 microg QD and budesonide 800 microg QD significantly increased FEV(1) (least-squares mean: 505 and 536 mL, respectively; both p<0.0001 versus baseline) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Lower limits of the 95% confidence intervals (ITT: -138 mL; per-protocol: -122 mL) were above the non-inferiority limit (-150 mL). Median percentage of days without asthma symptoms and without rescue medication use was 84% with ciclesonide and 85% with budesonide. AEs were unremarkable, with no cases of confirmed candidiasis. Median creatinine-adjusted urine cortisol significantly decreased with budesonide treatment (15.9-13.7 nmol cortisol/mmol creatinine; p=0.0086 versus baseline), but not with ciclesonide (p=0.1125). CONCLUSIONS: Ciclesonide 320 microg QD showed similar efficacy to budesonide 800 microg QD in adolescents with severe asthma. Ciclesonide was well tolerated and, unlike budesonide, had no effect on urine cortisol levels. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT No.: 2004-001233-41.     

Comparable effects of inhaled fluticasone propionate and budesonide on the HPA-axis in adult asthmatic patients

This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre cross-over study compared the effects on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis of fluticasone propionate (750 microg twice daily given via the Diskus) and budesonide (800 microg twice daily given via the Turbuhaler). Two treatment periods of 2 weeks each were preceded by a 2-week run-in period and separated by a 2-week washout period. During run-in and washout, patients received beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) or budesonide at a constant dose of 1500-1600 microg day(-1). Sixty patients aged 18-75 years with moderate to severe asthma not fully controlled by treatment with 1500-1600 microg day(-1) budesonide or BDP entered run-in and 45 completed the study. HPA axis suppression was assessed by morning serum cortisol (area under the curve from 08.00 to 10.30 hours) and 12-h nocturnal urinary cortisol excretion, measured at the end of run-in (baseline 1), at the end of washout (baseline 2), and at the end of each treatment period. Neither budesonide nor fluticasone produced significant suppression of either parameter compared to baselines. Only a few patients had serum-cortisol and urinary cortisol values below the normal range, before and after treatment. This shows that the patients did not have adrenal suppression before entering the study. The ratio between the AUC serum cortisol measured after fluticasone treatment and after budesonide treatment was 0.99 (95% CI 0.92-1.06), indicating equivalent effects on the HPA axis. This result was achieved after having omitted two patients' results, due to their very sensitive reaction to budesonide, but not to fluticasone. Two exacerbations of acute asthma occurred during budesonide treatment and none during fluticasone treatment. Both treatments were well tolerated. In conclusion, budesonide 1600 microg day(-1) via Turbuhaler and fluticasone propionate 1500 microg day(-1) via Diskus had no clinical effects on the HPA axis in patients with moderate to severe asthma.     

Determinants of the bronchodilation response to salbutamol on histamine-induced bronchoconstriction

Assessment of the bronchodilation response to short-acting beta2-adrenoreceptor agonists on pharmacologically induced bronchoconstriction has often been used to investigate airway smooth muscle beta2-adrenoreceptor function. However, little is known about factors affecting this response. In the present study, the bronchodilation response to 0.2 mg of salbutamol on histamine-induced bronchoconstriction was assessed in 101 steroid-na?ve asthmatic subjects. The associations of the response with a wide range of challenge procedure-related variables, clinical asthma severity indicators, and blood markers of airway inflammation were investigated. The response was re-assessed after 6 and 12 weeks' therapy with inhaled budesonide. Baseline FEV1, final histamine concentration, and the maximal fall in FEV1 explained 35-59% of the total variation in the response to salbutamol, depending on the index chosen to express the response. Serum concentration of myeloperoxidase, an index of neutrophilic inflammation, was associated with a poor response. The preceding week daily PEF variation, rescue bronchodilator use, severity of asthmatic symptoms, blood eosinophil count, and serum eosinophilic cationic protein and eosinophilic protein X concentrations were not associated with the response. The salbutamol response seemed to diminish during budesonide treatment but when adjusted by the challenge procedure-related variables the treatment effect vanished. In conclusion, the bronchodilation response to salbutamol on histamine-induced bronchoconstriction is largely determined by challenge procedure-related variables. It seems to be unrelated to the clinical severity of asthma and is not affected by treatment with inhaled corticosteroids. Neutrophilic airway inflammation may be associated with a poor response.     

Determinants of the Severity of Exercise‐Induced Bronchoconstriction in Patients with Asthma

Aim. In examining the mechanisms of exercise‐induced bronchoconstriction (EIB), it is important to determine which factors most strongly affect the severity of EIB. We determined such factors in patients with asthma by stepwise multiple‐regression analysis. Methods. Twenty‐three patients with asthma underwent pulmonary function tests, methacholine provocation test, and sputum induction. Eosinophilic inflammatory indices and airway vascular permeability index (ratio of albumin concentrations in induced sputum and serum) were examined in sputum samples, and then an exercise test was performed by all asthmatics. Results. There was a significant correlation between the severity of EIB and degree of eosinophilic inflammation in induced sputum. Moreover, there was a significant correlation between the severity of EIB and airway vascular permeability index. Although we could not find a significant correlation between the severity of EIB and 1‐sec forced expired volume, 20% provocation concentration of (PC₂₀) methacholine tended to be correlated with the severity of EIB. By stepwise multiple‐regression analysis, we also found that airway vascular permeability index, eosinophil cationic protein levels in sputum, and PC₂₀ methacholine are independent predictors of the severity of EIB. Conclusion. We found that airway vascular hyperpermeability, eosinophilic inflammation, and bronchial hyperreactivity are independent factors predicting the severity of EIB.     

Optimal asthma control, starting with high doses of inhaled budesonide.

The aim of this study was to determine whether outcomes in poorly controlled asthma can be further improved with a starting dose of inhaled budesonide higher than that recommended in international guidelines. The study had a parallel-group design and included 61 subjects with poorly controlled asthma, randomized to receive 3,200 microg or 1,600 microg budesonide daily by Turbuhaler for 8 weeks (double-blind), then 1,600 microg x day(-1) for 8 weeks (single-blind), followed by 14 months of open-label budesonide dose down-titration using a novel algorithm, with a written asthma crisis plan based on electronic peak expiratory flow monitoring. The primary outcome variable for weeks 1-16 was change in airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), and, for the open-label phase, mean daily budesonide dose. By week 16, there were large changes from baseline in all outcomes, with no significant differences between the 3,200- and 1,600-microg x day(-1) starting dose groups (AHR increased by 3.2 versus 3.0 doubling doses, p=0.7; morning peak flow increased by 134 versus 127 L x min(-1), p=0.8). Subjects starting with 3,200 microg x day(-1) were 3.8 times more likely to achieve AHR within the normal range, as defined by a provocative dose of histamine causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (PD20) of > or = 3.92 micromol by week 16 (p=0.03) [corrected]. During dose titration, there was no significant difference in mean budesonide dose (1,327 versus 1,325 microg x day(-1), p>0.3). Optimal asthma control was achieved in the majority of subjects (at completion/withdrawal: median symptoms 0.0 days x week(-1), beta2-agonist use 0.2 occasions x day(-1), and PD20 2.4 micromol). In subjects with poorly controlled asthma, a starting dose of 1,600 microg x day(-1) budesonide was sufficient to lead to optimal control in most subjects. The high degree of control achieved, compared with previous studies, warrants further investigation.     

Effect of disease duration on dose-response of inhaled budesonide in asthma

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) represent first-line treatment in persistent asthma with clinical studies showing benefits of initiating therapy early. Whether treatment should be started with a high or low dose remains controversial. We investigated the importance of disease duration on the response to the starting dose of the ICS, budesonide, in asthma patients not previously treated with ICS. METHODS: Forty patients with newly detected asthma (symptoms for <12 months) and 41 patients with established asthma (mean duration 5.2 years, range 2-11) were randomized (double-blind, parallel-group) to treatment with budesonide Turbuhaler 100 or 400microg twice daily or placebo for 12 weeks. RESULTS: For morning peak expiratory flow (mPEF), all four budesonide treatments resulted in statistically significant improvements from baseline and, after 12 weeks, the changes in all four groups were statistically significantly greater than placebo. In patients receiving early treatment, no significant differences were seen between budesonide doses. In patients with established symptoms, 800microg/day improved mPEF significantly more than 200microg/day. The 800microg/day dose in the early treatment group improved mPEF significantly more than in the delayed treatment group. Changes in forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1), the concentration of inhaled histamine causing a 20% drop in FEV1, and use of as-needed medication behaved in very similar ways to mPEF. Asthma symptoms were reduced in all budesonide groups without a difference between doses. CONCLUSION: In patients with newly detected asthma treated early the initial ICS dose is not important. In contrast, in patients with symptoms for a longer duration a high starting dose improves airway function and hyperresponsiveness significantly better than a low dose.     

Leukotriene modifier vs inhaled corticosteroid in mild-to-moderate asthma: clinical and anti-inflammatory effects

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Evidence for the anti-inflammatory activity of leukotriene receptor antagonists in humans is somewhat limited. There are also no data comparing the anti-inflammatory effects of leukotriene receptor antagonists with those of inhaled corticosteroids. This study was designed to assess the clinical efficacy and anti-inflammatory effects of leukotriene receptor antagonist plus low-dose inhaled corticosteroids compared to those of a high-dose inhaled corticosteroid in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma. METHODS: Forty-nine patients with newly diagnosed asthma were recruited. They were randomly assigned to groups that received, for a 6-week period, either (1) budesonide, 600 microg bid (1,200 microg/d) or (2) budesonide, 200 microg (400 microg/d), and zafirlukast, 20 mg bid. The variables of asthma control were recorded daily. Sputum induction and methacholine provocation tests were performed. RESULTS: The results indicated that the administration of a low-dose inhaled corticosteroid plus zafirlukast was as effective as that of a high-dose inhaled corticosteroid regarding clinical improvement and anti-inflammatory effects (ie, eosinophil percentage, and eosinophilic cationic protein [ECP] and cysteinyl leukotriene C4 levels in induced sputum). Nineteen (group 1, 8 patients; group 2, 11 patients) of 49 patients (38.8%) had returned to normal airway responsiveness after treatment. Among these patients, 16 patients (84.2%) had normal ECP levels and 10 patients (52.6%) had normal percentages of eosinophils. ECP level, but not the eosinophil percentage, was significantly associated with symptom scores. The peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) showed a significant correlation with the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) instead of with symptom scores. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a leukotriene modifier to treatment with low-dose inhaled corticosteroids is equivalent to treatment with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids in patients with newly diagnosed mild-to-moderate asthma. In addition to symptoms and PEFR, the monitoring of ECP and PC20 may be of great value in achieving optimal control of asthma.     

Formoterol added to low-dose budesonide has no additional antiinflammatory effect in asthmatic patients

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Adding inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists to a low dose of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) results in better asthma control than increasing the dose of ICSs. An important, but as yet unresolved, question is whether this is due to an additional reduction of airway inflammation. DESIGN: Double-blind, parallel-group trial. PATIENTS: Forty asthma patients (FEV1, 50 to 90% predicted; provocative concentration of a substance [methacholine] causing a 20% fall in FEV1 of < 8 mg/mL; no ICSs in the last 4 weeks). INTERVENTIONS: Randomization to 8 weeks of treatment with 100 microg of budesonide bid plus placebo (BUD200) or 100 microg of budesonide bid plus 12 microg of formoterol (BUD200 + F). Then the dose of budesonide (BUD) was increased to 400 microg bid in both groups for another 8 weeks. Bronchial biopsy specimens were collected before, and after 8 and 16 weeks of treatment. Eosinophils (major basic protein [MBP]) and mast cells (tryptase) were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: BUD200 reduced the MBP staining (p = 0.008) and tryptase staining (p = 0.048) in the epithelium compared to baseline levels. There were no significant differences between the BUD200 and BUD200 + F groups. In both groups, increasing the dosage of BUD to 800 microg had no significant additional antiinflammatory effect. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that BUD administered at a low dose has significant antiinflammatory effects in patients with mild asthma. No significant additional antiinflammatory effects could be demonstrated either by adding formoterol or by increasing the dose of BUD.     

Airway inflammation, airway responsiveness and cough before and after inhaled budesonide in patients with eosinophilic bronchitis.

Eosinophilic bronchitis is a common cause of chronic cough, characterized by sputum eosinophilia similar to that seen in asthma, but unlike asthma the patients have no objective evidence of variable airflow obstruction or airway hyperresponsiveness. The reason for the different functional associations is unclear. The authors have tested the hypothesis that in eosinophilic bronchitis the inflammation is mainly localized in the upper airway. In an open study the authors measured the lower (provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (PC20)) and upper (PC25 MIF50) airway responsiveness to histamine, lower and upper airway inflammation using induced sputum and nasal lavage, in II patients with eosinophilic bronchitis. The authors assessed changes in these measures and in cough reflex sensitivity to capsaicin and cough severity after 400 microg of inhaled budesonide for 4 weeks. A nasal eosinophilia was present in only three patients with one having upper airway hyperresponsiveness. Following treatment with inhaled corticosteroids the geometric mean sputum eosinophil count decreased from 12.8% to 2.9% (mean difference 4.4-fold, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.14-10.02), the mean +/- sem cough visual analogue score on a 100 mm scale decreased from 27.2 +/- 6.6 mm to 12.6 +/- 5.7 mm (mean difference 14.6, 95% CI 9.1-20.1) and the cough sensitivity assessed as the capsaicin concentration required to cause two coughs (C2) and five coughs (C5) improved (C2 mean difference 0.75 doubling concentrations, 95% CI 0.36-1.1; C5 mean difference 1.3 doubling concentration, 95% CI 0.6-2.1). There was a significant positive correlation between the fold change in sputum eosinophil count and doubling dose change in C5 after inhaled budesonide (r=0.61). It is concluded that upper airway inflammation is not prominent in eosinophilic bronchitis and that inhaled budesonide improves the sputum eosinophilia, cough severity and sensitivity suggesting a causal link between the inflammation and cough.     

Quantification of the Effect of Inhaled Budesonide on Airway Inflammation in Intermittent Asthma by Bronchitis Index

The bronchitis index (BI) is a scoring system for the visual quantification of airway inflammation by flexible bronchoscopy. A prospective study was carried out to determine whether patients with intermittent asthma present a considerable visible airway inflammation. Ten steroid-naive patients with intermittent asthma taking only inhaled β₂-agonists were enrolled and received budesonide (800 μg/day) over a period of 4 weeks. The airway inflammation was assessed by flexible electronic videobronchoscopy before and after the steroid treatment phase and quantified using the BI. Despite normal pulmonary function, all patients with intermittent asthma showed a marked visible airway inflammation that was reversed by a 4-week treatment with the inhaled steroid budesonide. The present study demonstrates that the BI may be useful as a clinical research tool for the assessment and quantification of airway inflammation in asthma. Furthermore, our results support the widely recognized theory that airway inflammation is present even in patients with mild asthma, and emphasize the necessity of an early therapy with inhaled steroids.