Comparison of conventional,photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine

Statement of problemConventional implant impressions by using elastomeric impression material have been reported as a more reliable technique for a complete-arch implant record compared with intraoral scanner procedures. Photogrammetry technology may provide a reliable alternative to digital scanning or a conventional impression; however, its accuracy remains unclear.PurposeThe purpose of this in vitro study was to measure and compare the implant abutment replica positions of the definitive cast with the implant abutment replica positions obtained by the conventional technique, photogrammetry, and 2 intraoral scanners.Material and methodsAn edentulous maxillary cast with 6 implant abutment replicas (RC analog for screw-retained abutment straight) was prepared. Three impression techniques were performed: the conventional impression technique (CNV group) by using a custom tray elastomeric impression procedure after splinting the impression copings at room temperature (23°C), photogrammetry (PG group) technology (Icam4D), digital scans by using 2 different IOSs following the manufacturer′s recommended scanning protocol, namely IOS-1 (iTero Element) and IOS-2 (TRIOS 3) groups (n=10). A coordinate measuring machine (CMM Contura G2 10/16/06 RDS) was used to measure the implant abutment replica positions of the definitive casts and to compare the linear discrepancies at the x-, y-, and z-axes and the angular distortion of each implant abutment replica position by using a computer aided-design software program (Geomagic) and the best fit technique. The 3D linear gap discrepancy was calculated. Measurements were repeated 3 times. The Shapiro-Wilk test revealed that the data were not normally distributed; therefore, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to analyze the data, followed by pairwise Mann-Whitney U tests (α=.05).ResultsSignificant y-axis linear and XY and YZ angular discrepancies were found among the CNV, PG, IOS-1, and IOS-2 groups (P<.05). The PG group obtained a significantly higher distortion on the y-axis and 3D gap compared with all the remaining groups (P=.004). The 3D discrepancy of the CNV group was 11.7 μm, of the IOS-1 group was 18.4 μm, of the IOS-2 was 21.1 μm, and of the PG group was 77.6 μm. In all groups, the interquartile range was higher than the median errors from the discrepancies measured from the definitive cast, indicating that the relative precision was low.ConclusionsThe conventional technique reported the lowest 3D discrepancy for the implant abutment position translation capabilities of all the implant techniques evaluated. The intraoral scanners tested provided no significant differences in linear distortion compared with the conventional method. However, the photogrammetry system tested provided the least accurate values, with the highest 3D discrepancy for the implant abutment positions among all the groups.     

摄影测量与传统印模技术制取牙列缺失种植修复印模精度的比较研究

目的:通过体外实验对比摄影测量与传统印模技术制取牙列缺失种植修复印模的精度。方法:选择1例2019年9月就诊于首都医科大学口腔医学院种植中心的74岁男性上颌牙列缺失患者的上颌石膏模型,其上含螺丝固位基台替代体8个。通过开窗夹板式印模复制该石膏模型,将复制模型作为参考模型。由同1名主治医师用两种方法制取参考模型种植体基台...     

Evaluation of the trueness and precision of eight extraoral laboratory scanners with a complete-arch model: a three-dimensional analysis

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the trueness and precision of eight different extraoral laboratory scanners using three-dimensional (3D) analysis method.MethodAn arch-shaped master model was designed with a computer software (Rapidform XOR2) and manufactured with a 3D printer (Projet 3510 MP). Then the master model was digitized with an industrial 3D scanner (ATOS Core 200). With each scanner master model was scanned ten times and stereolithography (.stl) data were imported into 3D analysis software (Geomagic Control). Accuracy was determined with evaluating trueness and precision.ResultsTrueness of the scanners were 27.5 μm for 7 series; 30.9 μm for D640; 26.8 μm for D710; 33.3 μm for Activity 102; 32.4 μm for Tizian Smart-Scan; 21.6 μm for NeWay; 26.1 μm for inEOS X5 and 17,47 μm for D2000. 28.2 μm for laser; 32.9 μm for white light and 21.7 μm for blue light scanners. Significant differences were found between scanners (p < .001), (p < .001). Precision of the scanners were 30.1 μm for 7 series; 31.7 μm for D640; 26.3 μm for D710; 22.7 μm for Activity 102; 25.1 μm for Tizian Smart-Scan; 15.7 μm for NeWay; 26.1 μm for inEOS X5; 16.6 μm for D2000. 29.2 μm for laser; 24.4 μm for white light and 19.2 μm for blue light scanners. Significant differences were found between scanners (p < .001), (p = .027).ConclusionsThe systems that had the best combination of trueness and precision for complete-arch scanning were D2000 and NeWay. Scanners using blue-light showed more accurate results than the white-light and laser scanners.     

重度牙周炎患者的全口种植时机考量

种植已成为预备行全口重建的重度牙周炎患者的常规治疗手段。然而,重度牙周炎患者的全口种植时机仍有争议。该文将从重度牙周炎的感染控制、角化黏膜、术前美学和功能评估及手术导板四个方面对预备行全口种植治疗的重度牙周炎患者的种植时机予以讨论。     

Maxillary and mandibular complete-arch implant rehabilitation using a complete digital workflow: A case report

This article summarizes the clinical steps involved in maxillary and mandibular complete-arch implant rehabilitation using a complete digital workflow. The maxillary arch was recorded using the double digital scan technique, and the mandibular arch using the triple digital scan technique. The digital protocol used in this case report allowed the recording of implant positions via scan bodies, soft tissues, and, most importantly, the interocclusal relationship in the same visit. A new technique for mandibular digital scan was described that uses soft tissue landmarks by creating windows in the patient's provisional prostheses to superimpose the three digital scans and consequently fabricate and verify the maxillary and mandibular prototype prostheses and definitive complete-arch zirconia prostheses.     

Maxillary complete-arch implant-supported restoration: A digital scanning and maxillomandibular relationship workflow

Intraoral scanners are increasingly used as a replacement for conventional impressions, including the capturing of edentulous arches, although their use may be clinically challenging. This technique article describes the fabrication and use of a custom scanning device to scaffold an intraoral complete-arch scan of at least 6 implant scan bodies in the edentulous maxilla while simultaneously capturing the maxillomandibular relationship for the purpose of establishing a digital workflow to fabricate a maxillary complete-arch implant-supported prosthesis.     

种植天然牙联合全牙弓即刻固定修复的失败原因分析

目的:通过对一例种植牙和天然牙联合即刻修复的病例进行长达三年追踪观察,从多角度对种植体失败的原因进行分析,为将来的临床治疗提供可供借鉴的经验.方法:两年间,临床共植入8枚种植体,修复方式先后采用了15-25种植牙天然牙联合的即刻修复,15-25种植支持的固定修复+16,17;26,27精密附着体活动修复,覆盖义齿修复.结果:植入的8枚种植体中有5枚种植体失败,与种植体联合即刻修复的2颗天然牙齿被拔除.结论:种植体和天然牙联合的即刻修复风险很高,临床在进行类似设计时,应当认真分析患者的实际条件,方可避免失败.     

Discrepancy at the implant abutment-prosthesis interface of complete-arch cobalt-chromium implant frameworks fabricated by additive and subtractive technologies before and after ceramic veneering

Statement of problemSelective laser melting additive manufacturing (AM) technologies can be used to fabricate complete-arch cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) implant-supported prostheses. However, the discrepancy at the implant-prosthesis interface with these fabrication techniques and after ceramic veneering remains unclear.PurposeThe purpose of the present in vitro investigation was to measure the discrepancy at the implant abutment-prosthesis interface before and after the ceramic veneering of frameworks fabricated by using subtractive and selective laser melting AM technologies.Material and methodsA completely edentulous cast with 6 implant abutment replicas (Multi-unit Abutment RP Replicas; Nobel Biocare Services AG) was prepared. A total of 20 Co-Cr frameworks were fabricated using subtractive or computer numerical control milling (CNC group) and additive (AM group) technologies (n=10). A coordinate measurement machine was used to measure the linear and angular discrepancy at the implant abutment-prosthesis interface. Subsequently, a ceramic veneer was applied to each framework following the same standardized protocol. A bonding layer (Chromium-Cobalt Bonding; Bredent), 2 opaquer layers (Powder opaque and liquid UF; Creation CC), a layer of dentin ceramic (Dentine A3; Creation CC), a layer of enamel ceramic (Enamel S-59; Creation CC), and a glaze layer (Glaze paste and Liquid GL; Creation CC) were applied following the manufacturer’s firing protocol. Coordinate measurement machine assessment was repeated to measure the linear and angular discrepancies after ceramic veneering procedures. Data were analyzed by using the Wilcoxon signedrank and Mann-Whitney U tests (α=.05).ResultsNo statistically significant differences (P>.05) were demonstrated in assessing the discrepancies at the implant abutment-prosthesis interface between the groups except for the XZ angle of the CNC group (P<.05). Ceramic techniques produced significantly higher linear and angular discrepancies in both groups (P<.001) with a mean ±standard deviation increase in the 3-dimensional gap of 36.9 ±15.6 μm in the CNC group and 38.9 ±16.6 μm in the AM group. The AM group presented significantly higher discrepancy in the x-axis than the CNC group (P<.001).ConclusionsManufacturing procedures did not significantly influence the discrepancy at the implant abutment-prosthesis interface, which was significantly increased after ceramic veneering, except for the XZ angle of the CNC group. The differences between the discrepancies at the implant abutment-prosthesis interface before and after ceramic application revealed no significant discrepancies among the groups, except in the AM group that presented a significantly higher discrepancy on the x-axis compared with the CNC group.     

Retrospective evaluation of complete-arch fixed partial dentures connecting teeth and implant abutments in patients with normal and reduced periodontal support

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The clinical outcome of complete-arch fixed prostheses supported by implants and natural tooth abutments in patients with normal or reduced periodontal support has been reported by few studies, with controversial results. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report on the implant success rate, prosthetic complications, and the occurrence of tooth intrusion, when complete-arch fixed prostheses, supported by a combination of implants and teeth, were fabricated for patients with normal and reduced periodontal support. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Nineteen patients with residual teeth that served as abutments were consecutively treated with combined tooth- and implant-supported complete-arch fixed prostheses and were retrospectively evaluated after a period varying from 24 to 94 months. Nine patients showed reduced periodontal support as a result of periodontal disease and treatment (RPS group), and 10 patients had normal periodontal support of the abutment teeth (more than 2/3 of periodontal support [NPS group]). Ninety implants and 72 tooth abutments were used to support 19 fixed partial dentures. Screw- and cement-retained metal-ceramic and metal-resin prostheses were fabricated with rigid and nonrigid connectors. Implant survival and success rates, occurrence of caries and tooth intrusion, and prosthetic complications were recorded. The number of teeth, implants, prosthetic units, fixed partial dentures, and nonrigid connectors were compared with a t test to assess differences between the 2 groups, while data for the occurrence of intrusions and prosthetic complications were compared with the Fisher exact test (alpha=.05). RESULTS: One of the 90 implants was lost (99% survival rate) over 24 to 94 months, while 3 implants showed more than 2 mm of crestal bone loss (96% success rate) over the same period. No caries were detected, but 5.6% (4/72) of the abutment teeth exhibited intrusion. Intrusion of abutment teeth was noted in 3 patients who had normal periodontal support (13% of teeth in NPS group) of the abutment teeth and was associated with nonrigid connectors. No intrusion of teeth was noted in the patients exhibiting reduced periodontal support regardless of the type of connector or when a rigid connector was used for either group. The number of intruded teeth was significantly greater in patients with intact periodontal support (P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: Complete-arch fixed prosthesis supported by implant and tooth abutments may be associated with intrusion of teeth with intact periodontal support when nonrigid connectors are used to join the implant- and tooth-supported sections of the prostheses. However, fixed partial dentures supported by implants and teeth with reduced periodontal support were not associated with tooth intrusion, regardless of the type of connectors used.     

Vibration characteristics of ultrasonic scalers assessed with scanning laser vibrometry

OBJECTIVES: Scanning laser vibrometry is a non-invasive method of accurately measuring the vibratory characteristics of oscillating objects. The aim of this study was to observe, using a scanning laser vibrometer (SLV), the vibration patterns of dental ultrasonic scaler tips and to assess the effects of water flow rate and power setting on these patterns whilst operating the tips in an unloaded environment. METHODS: A 30kHz ultrasonic scaler (TFI-10, Dentsply) was fixed in position and a laser beam from the SLV was focused onto the tip. The laser, guided by a virtual measurement grid, was scanned over the oscillating tip surface. Scans were taken with the laser beam perpendicular to the long axis of the front face of the tip. RESULTS: Oscillation frequencies and the displacement amplitude at the unconstrained end of the tip were measured for various power/water settings. Vibration nodal positions were recorded for the various settings and were found to occur approximately 4mm from the free end of the tip. At low and medium power settings, tip displacement amplitude was reduced by increased water flow. At high power settings, combined with a high flow rate, the water leaves the body of the instrument as a jet. This left the tip relatively unconstrained, allowing it to oscillate at increased displacement amplitudes. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the SLV is able to accurately characterise the movement of oscillating ultrasonic scaler tips. The tips are affected by power setting and water flow rates.     

Trueness and precision of digital impressions obtained using an intraoral scanner with different head size in the partially edentulous mandible

Purpose

It remains unclear whether digital impressions obtained using an intraoral scanner are sufficiently accurate for use in fabrication of removable partial dentures. We therefore compared the trueness and precision between conventional and digital impressions in the partially edentulous mandible.

Impact of scanning strategy on the accuracy of complete-arch intraoral scans: a preliminary study on segmental scans and merge methods

PURPOSEThis study investigated the accuracy of full-arch intraoral scans obtained by various scan strategies with the segmental scan and merge methods.MATERIALS AND METHODSSeventy intraoral scans (seven scans per group) were performed using 10 scan strategies that differed in the segmental scan (1, 2, or 3 segments) and the scanning motion (straight, zigzag, or combined). The three-dimensional (3D) geometric accuracy of scan images was evaluated by comparison with a reference image in an image analysis software program, in terms of the arch shape discrepancies. Measurement parameters were the intermolar distance, interpremolar distance, anteroposterior distance, and global surface deviation. One-way analysis of variance and Tukey honestly significance difference post hoc tests were carried out to compare differences among the scan strategy groups (α = .05).RESULTSThe linear discrepancy values of intraoral scans were not different among scan strategies performed with the single scan and segmental scan methods. In general, differences in the scan motion did not show different accuracies, except for the intermolar distance measured under the scan conditions of a 3-segmental scan and zigzag motion. The global surface deviations were not different among all scan strategies.CONCLUSIONThe segmental scan and merge methods using two scan parts appear to be reliable as an alternative to the single scan method for full-arch intraoral scans. When three segmental scans are involved, the accuracy of complete arch scan can be negatively affected.     

Digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: evaluation of anthropometric precision and accuracy using a Genex 3D camera system.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the precision and accuracy of facial anthropometric measurements obtained through digital three-dimensional (3D) photogrammetry. DESIGN: Nineteen standard craniofacial measurements were repeatedly obtained on 20 subjects by two independent observers, using calipers and 3D photos (obtained with a Genex 3D camera system), both with and without facial landmarks labeled. Four different precision estimates were then calculated and compared statistically across techniques. In addition, mean measurements from 3D photos were compared statistically with those from direct anthropometry. RESULTS: In terms of measurement precision, the 3D photos were clearly better than direct anthropometry. In almost all cases, the 3D photo with landmarks labeled had the highest overall precision. In addition, labeling landmarks prior to taking measurements improved precision, regardless of method. Good congruence was observed between means derived from the 3D photos and direct anthropometry. Statistically significant differences were noted for seven measurements; however, the magnitude of these differences was often clinically insignificant (< 2 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Digital 3D photogrammetry with the Genex camera system is sufficiently precise and accurate for the anthropometric needs of most medical and craniofacial research designs.     

Accuracy of impression scanning compared with stone casts of implant impressions

Statement of problem

Accurate virtual implant models are a necessity for the fabrication of precisely fitting superstructures.