Salvage living donor liver transplantation versus repeat liver resection for patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma and Child-Pugh class A liver cirrhosis: A propensity score-matched comparison

Following curative liver resection (LR), resectable tumor recurrence in patients with preserved liver function leads to deciding between a repeat LR and a salvage liver transplantation (LT), if a donor’s liver is available. This retrospective study compared survival outcomes and recurrence pattern following salvage living donor LT (LDLT) and repeat LR in patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent repeat LR (n = 163) or LDLT (n = 84) for recurrent HCC following curative resections, between January 2005 and December 2017 at a single institution. A 1:1 propensity score matching led to 42 patients per group. Disease-specific and recurrence-free survival were significantly better in the salvage LDLT group than in the repeat LR group (p = .042; HR = 2.40; 95% CI, 0.69–6.00 and p < .001; HR = 4.23; 95% CI, 2.05–8.71, respectively). Despite significant differences in recurrence patterns between the two groups (p = .019), the patient death rates, after recurrence, were similar for both groups (p = .760). This study indicates that salvage LDLT is superior to repeat LR for treating patients with transplantable, intrahepatic HCC recurrence, even in patients with Child-Pugh class A liver cirrhosis.     

Living donor liver transplantation or resection for Child‐Pugh A hepatocellular carcinoma patients with multiple nodules meeting the Milan criteria

The optimum primary treatment strategy for early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with multiple nodules remains unclear. We aimed to compare the outcomes of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) with that of liver resection (LR) for early Child‐Pugh A HCC patients with multiple nodules meeting the Milan criteria. From January 2007 to July 2012, 67 of 375 patients with early HCC in our centre fulfilled the inclusion criteria (group LDLT, n = 34 versus group LR, n = 33). Patient and tumour characteristics, operative data, postoperative course and outcomes were analysed retrospectively. The postoperative mortality and rate of major complications were similar in both groups. The 5‐year overall survival (OS; 76.5% vs. 51.2%, P = 0.046) and recurrence‐free survival (RFS; 72.0% vs. 19.8%, P = 0.000) were better in group LDLT than that in group LR. The 5‐year OS and RFS were similar between patients with tumours located in the same lobe (TSL) and those in the different lobes (TDL) after LDLT, whereas the 5‐year RFS was better in patients with tumours in TSL (30.6% vs. 0%, P = 0.012) after LR. In conclusion, primary LDLT might be the optimum treatment for early HCC patients with multiple nodules meeting the Milan criteria.     

Two-step Selection Criteria for Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

We have proposed risk factors for tumor recurrence, such as tumor nodule ≥5 cm and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin ≥300 mAU/mL after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this study was to clarify the risk factors for HCC recurrence and mortality within our criteria. We enrolled 152 adult recipients who had undergone LDLT for end-stage liver disease with HCC who met our criteria. The recurrence-free survival rates after LDLT were calculated. Risk factors for tumor recurrence were identified. On univariate analysis, factors affecting recurrence-free survival were pretransplant treatment for HCC, neutrophil-to-lumphocyte ratio (NLR) >4, alpha-fetoprotein ≥400 ng/mL, ≥5 nodules, and bilobar tumor distribution. Multivariate analysis identified that NLR >4 and ≥5 nodules were independent risk factors for tumor recurrence after LDLT (P = .003 and P = .002, respectively). Two-step selection criteria enable selection of patients who have high-risk of tumor recurrence.     

Improved Results of a Surgical Resection for the Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Purpose

This study was designed to analyze the clinical outcomes of the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and to evaluate the efficacy of a surgical resection in treating such a recurrence.

Methods

A total of 101 adult LDLT recipients with HCC between 1996 and 2007, including 17 who had recurrent HCC, were reviewed. The endpoints analyzed were survival from time of transplant and survival from time of recurrence. Recipient demographics, laboratory valuables, and tumor characteristics were analyzed. Any medical or surgical treatments that had been administered for any recurrence also were considered.

Results

The mean duration until the initial recurrence after LDLT and the mean duration until death after the initial recurrence were 12.9 months and 12.0 months, respectively. A univariate analysis showed that gender, interferon therapy, early posttransplant tumor recurrence, and eligibility for a surgical resection all had a beneficial impact on survival from tumor recurrence. A surgical resection of tumor relapse was the most important variable in our study, and therefore the patients were divided into two groups: surgical therapy group (n = 9), and nonsurgical therapy group (n = 7). Interestingly, the overall survival rates of the surgical group were significantly better than those of the nonsurgical group and were similar to that of the patients without HCC recurrence.

Conclusions

Surgical therapy might be useful for patients who experience a recurrence of HCC after LDLT to improve their outcome, when such treatment is available.     

Preoperative Alpha-Fetoprotein and Radiological Total Tumor Diameter as Predictors of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence After Liver Transplantation

BackgroundLiver transplantation is a unique treatment opportunity for patients with chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Selection of HCC patients for transplantation was revolutionized by Milan-based criteria, but tumor recurrence and shortage of organs are still a major concern. Nowadays, additional preoperative tumor parameters can help to refine the graft allocation process. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value and cut-off points of pretransplant serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels and radiological tumor parameters on liver transplantation outcomes.MethodsThis is a single-team retrospective cohort of 162 consecutive deceased donor liver transplants (DDLT) with pathologically confirmed HCC. Pretransplant serum AFP levels and radiological tumor parameters were retrieved from a preoperative follow-up. Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves were used to evaluate cut-off points for each outcome. Multivariate Cox regression model was used to assess the predictors of HCC relapse and recipient mortality.ResultsTwelve recipients (7.4%) had HCC recurrence after transplantation, with median survival time of 5.8 months. Pretransplant AFP ≥30 ng/mL (hazard ratio [HR]: 13.84, P = .003) and radiological total tumor diameter (TTD) ≥5 cm (HR: 12.89, P = .005) were independent predictors for HCC relapse. Moreover, pretransplant AFP ≥150 ng/mL was independently associated with recipient mortality (HR: 4.45, P = .003).ConclusionsPretransplant AFP levels and radiological TTD were independently associated with HCC relapse and recipient mortality after DDLT, with different cut-off points predicting different outcomes. These findings may contribute to improving decision-making in the context of liver transplantation for HCC patients.     

Living Donor Liver Transplantation Versus Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Within or Beyond the Milan Criteria: Comparable Long-Term Outcomes

BackgroundThe long-term outcomes after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) vs deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain controversial. We compared the long-term outcomes between LDLT and DDLT in patients with HCCs within or beyond the Milan criteria.MethodsThis retrospective study included 896 patients who underwent liver transplantation (829 LDLTs and 67 DDLTs) for HCC from June 2005 to May 2015. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method with log-rank test.ResultsRFS at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years after LDLT was 89.6%, 84.6%, 82.4%, and 79.6%, respectively, and, after DDLT, was 92.4%, 86.2%, 82.4%, and 82.4%, respectively, and OS at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years after LDLT was 96.1%, 88.1%, 85.6%, and 82.7%, respectively, and, after DDLT, was 97.0%, 83.6%, 82.1%, and 77.3%, respectively, with no significant differences in RFS (P = .838) or OS (P = .293) between groups. No statistically significant differences after LDLT or DDLT were identified in RFS (89.8% vs 98.1%, respectively, at 5 years; P = .053) or OS (90.4% vs 90.6% , respectively, at 5 years; P = .583) for HCCs meeting the Milan criteria as well as for those beyond the Milan criteria (RFS, 37.8% vs 28.6%, respectively, at 5 years; P = .560 and OS, 57.3% vs 50.0%, respectively, at 5 years; P = .743).ConclusionsPatients who underwent LDLT for HCCs showed comparable long-term outcomes to patients who underwent DDLT. Patients with HCCs within the Milan criteria demonstrated acceptable long-term outcomes after both LDLT and DDLT.     

Clinical analysis of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after living donor liver transplantation

This study aimed to analyze the clinical outcomes and factors influencing the outcome in the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Between October, 1997 and September, 2010, 25 (16.0%) of 156 patients who had undergone LDLT for HCC experienced recurrence. All patients with recurrence, with a single exception, were in the high‐risk group. Among patients with recurrence, 76.0% of patients experienced recurrence within one yr after LDLT. One‐ and five‐yr survival rates of recurred patients were 56.0% and 8.6%, respectively. Among them, 32% of patients were treated with curative‐intent treatment, and their one‐ and five‐yr survival rates were 62.5% and 25.0%, respectively. Beyond the Milan criteria at liver transplantation (LT) (p = 0.032), multiple recurrence (p = 0.001), and palliative treatment for recurrent tumors (p = 0.049) were related to poor survival after recurrence. Additionally, the independent prognostic factors included multiple recurrence (p = 0.005) and the Milan criteria at LT (p = 0.047). Because almost all recurrent cases belonged to the high‐risk group and recurred within two yr, the high‐risk group should undergo close follow‐up for early detection and be treated with liver‐directed therapies. Although the prognosis of recurrent HCC after LDLT is poor, long‐term survival can be expected on a single recurrence and curative treatment.     

Maternal grafts protect daughter recipients from acute cellular rejection after pediatric living donor liver transplantation for biliary atresia

Some studies have found that gender mismatch between donors and recipients are related to poor graft prognosis after liver transplantation. However, few studies have investigated the impact of gender mismatch on acute cellular rejection (ACR) in pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). This retrospective study investigated the clinical significance of these factors in ACR after pediatric LDLT. Between November 2001 and February 2012, 114 LDLTs were performed for recipients with biliary atresia (BA) using parental grafts. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses to identify the factors associated with ACR. The donor–recipient classifications included mother donor to daughter recipient (MD; n = 43), mother to son (n = 18), father to daughter (FD; n = 33), and father to son (n = 20) groups. The overall incidence rate of ACR in the recipients was 36.8%. Multivariate analysis showed that gender mismatch alone was an independent risk factor for ACR (P = 0.012). The FD group had a higher incidence of ACR than the MD group (P = 0.002). In LDLT, paternal grafts with gender mismatch were associated with a higher increased incidence of ACR than maternal grafts with gender match. Our findings support the possibility that maternal antigens may have an important clinical impact on graft tolerance in LDLT for patients with BA.     

Overexpression of miR-21 Is Associated With Recurrence in Patients With Hepatitis B Virus–Mediated Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Liver Transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) is the best treatment option for hepatitis B virus (HBV)–mediated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Nevertheless, recurrence is the most important issue after LT. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the relation of dysregulated expression of microRNAs (miRNAs) in recurrence formation in HBV-mediated HCC cases. A total of 42 HBV-mediated HCC patients were evaluated in this study.Among 21 miRNAs, the expression level of miR-106a and miR-21 were higher and miR-143 and miR145 were lower in patients with HCC compared with noncancerous liver tissues (P = .0388, P = .0214, P = .0321, and P = .002, respectively). Compared with nonrecurrent patients, the expression level of miR-21 was 3.54-fold higher and miR-145 was 2.42-fold lower in patients with recurrence during the 5-year follow-up (P = .004 and P = .032; respectively). In addition, according to multivariate Cox regression analysis, the overexpression of miR-21 was found to be a prognostic indicator in HBV-mediated HCC patients (P = .002).In conclusion, we show a significant association between high expression of miR-21 and recurrence in HBV-mediated HCC. Therefore, up-regulation of miR-21 could serve as a promising prognostic marker for HCC.     

Prediction of early allograft dysfunction using serum phosphorus level in living donor liver transplantation

Serum phosphorus is greatly affected by liver surgeries, but its change after liver transplantation has not yet been clarified. We investigated the predictive role of serum phosphorus for early allograft dysfunction (EAD) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Perioperative factors, including serum phosphorus level, of 304 patients who underwent LDLT were retrospectively studied and compared between patients with and without EAD after LDLT. Potentially significant factors (P < 0.15) in univariate comparisons were subjected to multivariate logistic regression analysis to develop a prediction model for EAD. A total of 48 patients (15.8%) met the EAD criteria. Patients with EAD experienced more severe preoperative disease conditions, higher one‐month mortality and more elevated serum phosphorus concentrations during the first week after surgery compared with patients without EAD (P = 0.016). Multivariate analysis showed that a serum phosphorus level ≥4.5 mg/dl on postoperative day 2 was an independent predictor of EAD occurrence after LDLT (relative risk: 2.36, 95% confidence interval [1.18–4.31], P = 0.017), together with a history of past abdominal surgery, emergency transplantation and preoperative continuous veno‐venous haemodiafiltration. These data indicate that hyperphosphataemia during the immediate postoperative days could be utilized as a predictor of EAD after LDLT.     

Recurrence at surgical margin following hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases is not associated with R1 resection and does not impact survival

BackgroundResection margin status has traditionally been associated with tumor recurrence and oncological outcome following liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. Previous studies, however, did not address the impact of resection margin on the site of tumor recurrence and did not differentiate between true local recurrence at the resection margin and recurrence elsewhere in the liver. This study aimed to determine whether positive resection margins determine local recurrence and whether recurrence at the surgical margin influences long-term survival.MethodsClinicopathological data and oncological outcomes of patients who underwent curative resection for colorectal liver metastases between 2012 and 2017 at 2 major hepatobiliary centers (Bern, Switzerland, and Berlin, Germany) were assessed. Cross-sectional imaging following hepatectomy was reviewed by radiologists in both centers to distinguish between recurrence at the resection margin, defined as hepatic local recurrence, and intrahepatic recurrence elsewhere. The association between surgical margin status and location of tumor recurrence was evaluated, and the impact on overall survival was determined.ResultsDuring the study period, 345 consecutive patients underwent hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Histologic surgical margins were positive for tumor cells (R1) in 63 patients (18%). After a median follow-up time of 34 months, tumor recurrence was identified in 154 patients (45%). Hepatic local recurrence was not detected more frequently after R1 than after R0 resection (P = .555). Hepatic local recurrence was not associated with worse overall survival (P = .436), while R1 status significantly impaired overall survival (P = .025). Additionally, overall survival was equivalent between patients with hepatic local recurrence and patients with any intrahepatic and/or extrahepatic recurrence. In patients with intrahepatic recurrence only, oncological outcomes improved if local hepatic therapy was possible (resection or ablation) in comparison to patients treated only with chemotherapy or best supportive care (3-year overall survival: 85% vs 39%; P < .0001).ConclusionThe incidence of hepatic local recurrence after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases is independent of R1 resection margin status. Additionally, hepatic local recurrence at the resection margin is not associated with worse overall survival compared with any other intra- or extrahepatic recurrence. Therefore, R1 status at hepatectomy seems to be a surrogate factor for advanced disease without influencing location of recurrence and thereby oncological outcome. This finding may support decision-making when extending the indication for surgery in borderline resectable colorectal liver metastases.     

Preoperative prediction score of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence in living donor liver transplantation: Validation of SNAPP score developed at Asan Medical Center

The previously proposed scoring systems are not readily available because of the lack of simplicity for predicting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence. We aimed to develop and validate the new score system, which can predict HCC recurrence after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) by using morphologic and biologic data. Predictors for HCC recurrence after LDLT were developed (n = 627) and validated (n = 806) in 1433 patients for whom we could collect information to date between 2007 and 2016 at Asan Medical center (AMC) to create the SNAPP score (tumor S ize and N umber, alpha-fetoprotein [A FP], vitamin K absence-II [P IVKA-II], positron emission tomography [P ET]). On logistic regression based on 3-year recurrence-free survival, the SNAPP factors were independently associated with HCC recurrence. The SNAPP score was highly predictive of HCC recurrence (C statistic, 0.920), and 5-year post-LT recurrence rates were significantly different between low, intermediate, and high SNAPP score groups. The performance of the SNAPP score (C-index [95% confidence interval], 0.840 [0.801-0.876]) on predicting tumor recurrence after LDLT was better than that of the New York/California, the Risk Estimation of Tumor Recurrence After Transplant (RETREAT), and the Model of Recurrence After Liver Transplant (MoRAL) score. The SNAPP score provides excellent prognostication after LDLT for HCC patients. Hence, we can help voluntary patients’ decisions about whether to undergo LDLT or not.     

Liver stiffness measurement predicts short-term and long-term outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after curative liver resection

Background and aimHepatocellular carcinoma is one of the commonest cancer in the world. Despite curative resection, recurrence remains the largest challenge. Many risk factors were identified for predicting recurrence, including liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Transient elastography (Fibroscan) is an accurate tool in measuring liver fibrosis. This study aimed to evaluate the use of preoperative liver stiffness measurement (LSM), with Fibroscan in predicting long-term recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after curative resection.MethodA prospective cohort study was conducted from February 2010 – June 2017 in Prince of Wales hospital. All consecutive patients with HCC undergone hepatectomy were included. Demographic factors, preoperative LSM, tumor characteristics and operative details were assessed. Primary outcome and secondary outcome were overall survival and disease free survival at 1 year, 3 year and 5 year respectively.ResultsA total of 401 cases were included. Patients with LSM ≥12kPa had significantly lower 5-year overall survival rate (75.1% vs 57.3%, p < 0.001) and disease free survival rate (45.8% vs. 26.7%, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, pre-operative creatinine and vascular invasion of tumor were significant factors in predicting early recurrence (p = 0.012 and p = 0.004). LSM ≥12kPa were the only significant factor in predicting late recurrence (p = 0.048).ConclusionPre-operative liver stiffness measurement could predict the late recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection.     

Long‐term results for living donor liver transplant recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma using intraoperative blood salvage with leukocyte depletion filter

Massive intraoperative bleeding during liver transplantation often requires large amounts of blood products. The goal of this study was to investigate long‐term outcomes of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent intraoperative use of intraoperative blood salvage (IBS) and leukocyte depletion filter (LDF). In this study, we included 230 LDLT recipients with HCC from two transplantation centers, between February 2002 and December 2007. Group 1 patients (n = 121) underwent intraoperative IBS with LDF and group 2 patients (n = 109) did not. The amount of autotransfused, filtered red blood cells (RBCs) in group 1 was 1590.2 ± 1486.8 ml, which corresponded to 5.9 units of allogenic leukocyte‐depleted RBCs saved. The incidences of renal dysfunction, postoperative bleeding, and urinary tract infection in group 2 were higher than in group 1 (P < 0.05). Recurrence‐free survival rates for 1, 3, and 5 years were 91.3%, 83.3%, and 83.3%, respectively, in group 1, and 84.6%, 79.0%, and 77.4%, respectively, in group 2 (P = 0.314). IBS using LDF does not increase the risk of cancer recurrence during LDLT for recipients with HCC. Therefore, the use of IBS with LDF appears to be safe for LDLT recipients with HCC.     

Liver Resection in Transplanted Patients: A Single-Center Western Experience

Background

Liver resection (LR) in liver transplant (OLT) recipients, an extremely rare situation, who performed on 8 recipients.

Methods

This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data concerned 8 (0.66%) 1198 LR cases among OLT performed from 1997 to 2011. We analyzed demographic data, surgical indications, and postoperative courses.

Results

The indications were resectable recurrent hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC, n = 3), persistent fistula from a posterior sectorial duct (n = 1), recurrent cholangitis due to anastomotic stricture on the posterior sectorial duct (n = l), hydatid cyst (n = l), left arterial hepatic thrombosis with secondary ischemic cholangitis (n = 1), and a large symptomatic biliary cyst (n = 1). The mean interval time to liver resection was 23.7 months (range, 5–47). LR included right hepatectomy (n = 1), right posterior hepatectomy (n = 1), left lobectomy (n = 4), pericystectomy (n = 1), or biliary fenestration (n = 1). Which there was no postoperative mortality, the global morbidity rate was 62% (5/8). The mean follow-up after LR was 92 months (range, 11–156). No patients required retransplantation. None of the 3 patients who underwent LR for HCC showed a recurrence.

Conclusions

LR in OLT recipients is safe, but associated with a high morbidity rate. This procedure can avoid retransplantation in highly selected patients, presenting a possible option particularly for transplanted patients with a resectable, recurrent HCC.     

Liver transplantation versus liver resection for colorectal liver metastasis: a survival benefit analysis in patients stratified according to tumor burden score

Liver transplantation (LT) for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) may provide excellent survival rates in patients with unresectable disease. High tumor load is a risk factor for recurrence and low overall survival (OS) after liver resection (LR). We tested the hypothesis that LT could offer better survival than LR in patients with high tumor load. LR performed at Padua University Hospital for CRLM was compared with LT for unresectable CRLM performed both at Oslo and Padua. High tumor load was defined as tumor burden score (TBS) ≥ 9, and inclusion criteria were as in the SECA-I transplant study. 184 patients were eligible: 128 LRs and 56 LTs. 5-year OS after LR and LT was 40.5% and 54.7% (P = 0.102). In the high TBS cohort, 5-year OS after LR and LT was 22.7% and 52.2% (P = 0.055). In patients with Oslo score ≤ 2 and TBS ≥ 9 (13 LR; 24 LT) the 5-year OS after LR and LT was 14.6% and 69.1% (P = 0.002). The corresponding disease-free survival (DFS) was 0% and 22.9% (P = 0.005). Selected CRLM patients with low Oslo score and high TBS could benefit from LT with survival outcomes that are far better than what is achieved by LR.     

Comparison of Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Resection in Patients with Cirrhosis to Its Occurrence in a Surveilled Cirrhotic Population

The presence of cirrhosis is the only risk factor that is advocated for recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) 2 years after hepatic resection compared with noncirrhotic control subjects; however, data for cohorts of exclusively patients with cirrhosis are lacking. This study was designed to assess risk factors and annual incidence of early (<2 years) and late (>2 years) recurrence after resection of cirrhosis and to compare these findings with those of patients with cirrhosis enrolled in HCC surveillance programs (HCC occurrence). Data from 204 patients with cirrhosis resected for HCC and 150 surveilled for cirrhosis were retrospectively collected and compared using propensity score matching to overcome biases of nonrandomized study. Risk factors for early recurrence (incidence = 21.8%/year) were higher serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels, poorly differentiated tumor, and presence of microvascular invasion (P < 0.05). Risk factors for both late recurrence (18.4%/year) and HCC occurrence (3.3%/year) were male gender, older age, and higher serum transaminase levels; multiple primary tumors and higher AFP were additional risk factors for late recurrence and HCC occurrence respectively (P < 0.05). After propensity adjustment, resected patients with less than two risk factors for late recurrence showed an annual incidence of HCC (6.2%/year) similar to that of surveilled patients with ≥2 risk factors (5.8%/year; P = 0.898). Early and late recurrence of HCC for patients with cirrhosis after resection have distinct risk factors. Annual incidence of HCC 2 years or more after resection may be similar to that of general patients because the same risk factors are involved; assessment of these characteristics could be useful in tailoring clinical management.     

Re-evaluation of lipiodolized transarterial chemoembolization therapy for intrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after curative liver resection

Background/Purpose  While lipiodolized transarterial chemoembolization (lip-TACE) is effective for treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), its effect for treating recurrent HCC after curative liver resection needs to be clarified. Methods  Of 163 patients who had undergone curative liver resection between 1992 and December 2003, 65 patients (39.8%) had recurrent HCC in the liver without extrahepatic recurrence and were indicated for lip-TACE. The overall survival rate after lip-TACE was calculated, and its correlation with factors such as the histology of the primary HCC and background noncancerous tissue were analyzed. Results  The overall survival rates after lip-TACE after the detection of the first recurrent HCC were 82.6%, 44.5%, and 24.8% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The factors affecting patient survival after lip-TACE were microscopic portal venous involvement of HCC at liver resection, grade of inflammation in the noncancerous liver parenchyma, and recurrence within 1 year after the initial liver resection. Multivariate analysis showed that the period between the resection and first recurrence had the highest hazard ratio. Conclusions  Lip-TACE is a reasonable procedure for treating recurrent HCC in selected patients who are not eligible for hepatic re-resection. When HCC recurred within 1 year from the primary liver resection, the effect of lip-TACE on patient survival was limited.     

Incidence and risk factors for new‐onset diabetes in living‐donor liver transplant recipients

With the increased number of long‐term survivors after liver transplantation, new‐onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is becoming more significant in patient follow‐up. However, the incidence of new‐onset diabetes after living‐donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has not been well elucidated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for NODAT in adult LDLT recipients at a single center in Japan. A retrospective study was performed on 161 adult patients without diabetes who had been followed up for ≥three months after LDLT. NODAT was defined according to the 2003 American Diabetes Association/World Health Organization guidelines. The recipient‐, donor‐, operation‐, and immunosuppression‐associated risk factors for NODAT were assessed. Overall, the incidence of NODAT was 13.7% (22/161) with a mean follow‐up of 49.8 months. In a multivariate analysis, the identified risk factors for NODAT were donor liver‐to‐spleen (L‐S) ratio (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.022, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.001–0.500, p = 0.017), and steroid pulse therapy for acute rejection (HR = 3.320, 95% CI = 1.365–8.075, p = 0.008). In conclusion, donor L‐S ratio and steroid pulse therapy for acute rejection were independent predictors for NODAT in LDLT recipients. These findings can help in screening for NODAT and applying early interventions.     

Graft size and donor age are independent factors for graft loss in adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation using the left liver

Background/purpose  Graft survival is affected by various factors, such as preoperative state and the ages of the recipient and donor, as well as graft size. The objective of this study was to analyze the risk factors for graft survival. Methods  From September 1997 to July 2005, 24 patients who had undergone living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) were retrospectively analyzed. Sixteen patients survived and the eight graft-loss cases were classified into two groups according to the cause of graft loss: graft dysfunction without major post-transplantation complications (graft dysfunction group; n = 3), and graft dysfunction with such complications (secondary graft dysfunction group; n = 5). Various factors were compared between these groups and the survival group. Results  Mean donor age was 31.9 years in the survival group and 49.2 years in the secondary graft dysfunction group (P = 0.024). Graft weight/recipient standard liver volume ratios (G/SLVs) were 36.7% in the survival group, and 26.2% in the graft dysfunction group (P = 0.037). The postoperative mean PT% for 1 week was 48.6% in the survival group and 38.1% in the secondary graft dysfunction group (P = 0.05). Conclusions  Our surgical results demonstrated that G/SLV and donor age were independent factors that affected graft survival rates.