Relative dependence of diameters of branches in coronary bifurcations after stent implantation in main vessel--importance of carina position

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Bifurcation lesions are relatively frequently encountered in everyday interventional practice. Stenting of the vessel chosen to be main (usually the larger one) frequently leads to stenosis at the ostium of the side branch (SB) and compromises its flow (side branch compromise--SBC). The relative dependence of main and side branch diameters, based on the concept of carina displacement of stent struts, was examined in a cohort of patients with bifurcation stenting. METHODS: We accept that the basic mechanism for SBC after stent placement in the parent vessel is carina shifting from expanded stent struts. The ostial SB minimal lumen diameter (MLD), percentage diameter stenosis (%DS) at maximal and calculated actual carina displacement, as well as distal limb diameter (DLD) in the main branch were calculated and compared with actually observed values. RESULTS: A group of 55 consecutive patients with acceptable quality angiograms formed the study population. General patient characteristics were similar to other bifurcation studies. Left anterior descending artery was predominantly treated in 73% of patients. There was worsening SB ostial stenosis after stent implantation (%DS increase from 48%+/-23% to 69%+/-21%, p <0.001) and final improvement because of kissing balloon inflation or SB postdilatation (post vs. final-69+/-21% and 53+/-25%, p<0.001). Stent implantation causes straightening of the main vessel, evident from a significant increase in angle C (pre- 148 degrees +/-19 degrees vs. 156 degrees +/-16 degrees after stenting, p=0.007). Relations between observed and predicted values for main branch DLD and %DS demonstrated a good correlation between predicted and observed values (for DLD r=0.66, p<0.001, and for %DS r=0.53, p <0.001). There was an excellent fit of regression lines between theoretical predictions and actual measurements for side branches (MLD r=0.91, p<0.001, %DS r=0.89, p<0.001).CONCLUSIONS: Carina displacement from stent struts is a major mechanism governing changes in coronary bifurcations after main vessel stenting. Improvement in the ostium of the side branch causes shifting back of the carina and a decrease of main vessel diameter. The long-term consequences of this phenomenon are not currently known.     

Theoretical prediction of side branch compromise after main branch stenting in coronary bifurcation

One of the main problems of treatment of bifurcation lesions is side branch (SB) stenosis appearing after stent placement in the main vessel.The aim of this study was to create quantitative method for prediction of side branch compromise extent.We accepted that the main mechanism for SB ostial stenosis is flow divider (FD) displacement from stent struts after stent implantation in the main vessel.Using easily measurable parameters from coronary angiography,as SB diameter,angle α (initial angle between axes of parent vessel and SB axis) and angle α' (angle between above mentioned axes after stent placement) we can calculate percentage diameter stenosis at branch ostium (%DS):%DS = sin (α - α')/(tan α).In boundary condition of full FD displacement %DS = cos α.We tested our theoretical predictions with fluoroscopic observation of elastic wall model of bifurcation (45°distal angle between branches)permitting wall deformations with stent.There is full coincidence of values of %DS and percentage area stenosis (%AS).The regular formulas for calculations of %DS and %AS overestimate stenosis severity between 10% and 25%.Our model tests have shown full coincidence between predicted values for %DS and observed values.We demonstrate that part of the SB ostium is not visible in regular angiography and contributes to ostial lumen area.This is a method that permits quantitative prediction of side branch compromise.     

The Carina Angle—New Geometrical Parameter Associated with Periprocedural Side Branch Compromise and the Long‐Term Results in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions with Main Vessel Stenting Only

Background: The two main problems unresolved in coronary bifurcation stenting are periprocedural side branch compromise and higher restenosis at long term. The purpose of this study is to reveal the link between periprocedural side branch compromise and long‐term results after main vessel stenting only in coronary bifurcations. Methods: Eighty‐four patients formed the study population. The inclusion criteria were good‐quality angiograms, with maximal between‐branch angle opening, no overlap, permitting accurate angiographic analysis. Carina angle (α)—the distal angle between main vessel (MV) before bifurcation and side branch (SB)—was measured pre‐ and poststenting. Clinical follow‐up 9–12 months was obtained with coronary angiography if needed. Results: The patient population was high‐risk with 33% diabetics and 84% two‐ and three‐vessel disease. Ninety‐five stents were implanted in 92 lesions, with three T‐stenting cases. Drug‐eluting stents were implanted in 54%. Kissing‐balloon (KBI) or sequential inflation was performed in 35%. SB functional closure occurred in 17.4%, with independent predictors α < 40° and diameter ratio MB/SB >1.22. After 12±4 months there were five myocardial infarctions (6%) and 13 (15%) target lesion revascularization procedures. Independent predictors of major cardiovascular events were carina angle <40°, MB lesion length >8 mm, negative change of between‐branch angle, DES usage, and KBI. Conclusions: Smaller carina angle with straightening of MV—main branch from stent implantation in coronary bifurcations predicted higher SB compromise, restenosis, and MACE rates during follow‐up of 1 year.     

Preintervention angiographic and intravascular ultrasound predictors for side branch compromise after a single-stent crossover technique

A single stent crossover technique is the most common approach to treating bifurcation lesions. In 90 bifurcation lesions with side branch (SB) angiographic diameter stenosis <75%, we assessed preintervention intravascular ultrasound (IVUS; of main branch [MB] and SB) predictors for SB compromise (fractional flow reserve [FFR] <0.80) after a single stent crossover. Minimal lumen area (MLA) was measured within each of 4 segments (MB just distal to the carina, polygon of confluence, MB just proximal to polygon of confluence, and SB ostium). All lesions showed Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow in the SB after MB stenting. Although angiographic diameter stenosis at the SB ostium increased from 26 ± 15% before the procedure to 36 ± 21% after stenting (p = 0.001), FFR <0.80 was observed in only 16 patients (18%). Negative remodeling (remodeling index <1) was seen in 83 (92%) lesions but did not correlate with FFR after stenting. Independent predictors for FFR after stenting were maximal balloon pressure (p = 0.002) and MLA of SB ostium before percutaneous coronary intervention (p <0.001), MLA within the MB just distal to the carina (p = 0.025), and plaque burden at the SB ostium before percutaneous coronary intervention (p = 0.005), but not angiographic poststenting diameter stenosis or minimal lumen diameter. For prediction of FFR <0.80 after percutaneous coronary intervention, the best cutoff of MLA within the SB ostium before percutaneous coronary intervention was 2.4 mm(2) (sensitivity 94%, specificity 69%). Also, the cutoff of plaque burden within the SB ostium before percutaneous coronary intervention was ≥51% (sensitivity 75%, specificity 71%). In 67 lesions with an MLA ≥2.4 mm(2) or plaque burden <50% before percutaneous coronary intervention, 63 (94%) showed FFR ≥0.80. However, FFR <0.80 was seen in only 12 (52%) of 23 lesions with an MLA <2.4 mm(2) and plaque burden ≥50%. In conclusion, there do not appear to be reliable IVUS predictors of functional SB compromise after crossover stenting.     

Extension Distance Mismatch—An Unrecognized Factor for Suboptimal Side Branch Ostial Coverage in Bifurcation Lesion Stenting

Background: The unsatisfactory side branch (SB) ostial strut coverage remains a problem in coronary bifurcation stenting. Both the surplus and lack of struts at SB ostium may be the causative mechanism. We propose that the inability of available stents to cover the “extension distance” of the bifurcation region is the cause of in‐stent restenosis. Methods: The extension distance (ED) is defined as the maximal distance at the carina tip, which must be covered by the stent struts to ensure optimal coverage of the main branch (MB) and SB openings. A mathematical model was created, representing the key factors that govern geometrical reconfigurations after stent implantation in bifurcations. There are two options—with and without bifurcation region deformation. The theoretical assumptions were tested on a bifurcation model (soft polyvinylchloride polymer tubes) permitting free wall deformations and the following parameters: Parent Vessel, MB, SB diameters of 3.5, 3.0, and 2.5 mm, respectively, with an angle of 45° between the MB and SB. After stenting, final KBI with 3.5 mm and 3.0 mm balloons was performed up to 20 atm. Results: After the carina displacement, the ED, which has to be covered, is considerably smaller if the suboptimal result (DS >50%) at the SB ostium is acceptable. The maximal EDs from the bench test measurements are: Vision, Abbott Vascular – 5.62 mm ± 0.04; Liberte, Boston Scientific Corp. – 5.2 mm ± 0.03; Chopin2, Balton – 4.58 mm ± 0.05; Volo, Invatec – 4.41 mm ± 0.04; Driver, Medtronics – 4.39 mm ± 0.04; BxSonic, Cordis, J&J – 4.48 mm ± 0.05. The theoretical maximal ED of the model is 6.91 mm—28–62% larger than actually observed with different stents. Conclusions: The achievement of perfect ostial coverage of the SB is unsatisfactory with most of the currently available stents, especially when poststenting excessive dilation of the ostium of the SB is performed. (J Interven Cardiol 2010;23:305–318)     

Limited balloon expansion through the struts of the Palmaz-Schatz and NIR stents compared with the Multi-Link stent

After placing a stent in the main vessel of a bifurcation lesion, it is sometimes necessary to perform further balloon inflation in order to treat an ostial lesion in a side branch. The stent struts may prevent full balloon expansion at the ostium of a side branch, resulting in residual ostial stenosis. The degree of completeness of balloon inflation may vary significantly depending on the stent design and structure. A model of a bifurcation lesion with an angle of 45 degrees was created from acrylic resin. The diameters of the main vessel and the side branch were both 3.5 mm. Deployment of the Palmaz-Schatz stent (n=5), NIR stent (n=5) or Multi-Link stent (n=5) was performed in the main vessel with a 3.5-mm balloon catheter inflated to 12 atm. A 3.5-mm balloon catheter was then inflated to 12 atm through the stent struts of the main vessel and into the ostium of the side branch. The degree of completeness of balloon inflation (% balloon expansion) was calculated as (smallest diameter of balloon catheter/reference diameter of balloon catheter) x 100%. The minimal lumen diameter (MLD) and cross-sectional area (CSA) at the ostium of the side branch created with the stent struts were also measured. Limited balloon expansion through the struts was observed with the Palmaz-Schatz stent and the NIR stent, but almost full balloon expansion was observed with the Multi-Link stent (% balloon expansion: Palmaz-Schatz stent 80%, NIR stent 60%, Multi-Link stent 94%, p<0.01). The MLD and CSA of the dilated struts, representing the ostium of the side branch, of the Palmaz-Schatz stent (2.2+/-0.1 mm, 4.5+/-0.3 mm2) and the NIR stent (1.8+/-0.1 mm, 3.1+/-0.3 mm2) were significantly smaller compared with those of the Multi-Link stent (3.0+/-0.2 mm, 8.4+/-0.6 mm2) (p<0.01). The struts of the Palmaz-Schatz stent and the NIR stent deployed in the main vessel of a bifurcation prevent full expansion of a balloon catheter inflated at the side branch ostium. In contrast, almost full balloon expansion through the struts of the Multi-Link stent is achieved.     

Dedicated bifurcation stents – Mechanistic,hardware, and technical aspects

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in bifurcation lesions is associated with lower success rate, higher acute complication rates and higher event rates in follow-up.The reason for this higher than usual complication rate relates to the relationship between anatomy, flow, and atheroma distribution in bifurcation lesions.Further, stenting these lesions can be a prolonged procedure and can be technically more demanding. The most common complication is the loss of significant side branch (SB). Main vessel (MV) stenting may enhance the carina displacement and atheroma shift across the SB ostium leading to SB ostium narrowing.Finally, complications, if they occur, are more difficult to manage. Dedicated bifurcation stent has been developed to overcome the number of limitations associated with conventional bifurcation PCI. The main advantage of most dedicated bifurcation stents is to allow the operator to perform the procedure on a bifurcation lesion without the need to rewire the SB.     

Difference in security of stent jail between Palmaz-Schatz, NIR, and Multi-Link stents: the effect of balloon inflation through stent struts.

After placing a stent in the main vessel of a bifurcation lesion, it is often necessary to perform further balloon inflation or stent placement through the stent struts in order to treat a lesion of the secondary vessel or side branch. This balloon inflation with dilatation through the cells of the stent in the main vessel results in stent strut disfigurement. This disfigurement causes various degrees of stenosis within the main vessel secondary to stent strut deformity. The degree of strut deformity, and therefore stenosis, may vary significantly depending on stent design and structure. A model of a bifurcation lesion with an angle of 45 degrees was created from acrylic resin. The diameters of the main vessel and the secondary vessel were both 3.5 mm. Deployment of the Palmaz-Schatz stent (PS, n = 5), NIR stent (n = 5), or Multi-Link stent (n = 5) was performed in the main vessel with a 3.5-mm balloon catheter inflated to 6 atm. A second 3.5-mm balloon catheter was then inflated to 6 atm through the stent struts of the main vessel and into the ostium of the secondary vessel. The minimal lumen diameter (MLD) and cross-sectional area (CSA) at the ostium of the side branch and the stenosis within the main vessel were then measured, taking into account the stent deformity that occurred. Kissing balloon dilatation with two 3.5-mm balloon catheters was then performed and the stenosis secondary to stent deformity in the main vessel was remeasured. The MLD of the Multi-Link stent at the side-branch ostium was greater compared with those of the Palmaz-Schatz stent or the NIR stent (2.4 +/- 0.1, 1.6 +/- 0.1, 1.7 +/- 0.1 mm, P < 0.01) and CSA (4.9 +/- 0.5, 2.7 +/- 0.3, 2.5 +/- 0.3 mm(2), P < 0.01). Balloon inflation through the stent struts caused stent deformity that resulted in some degree of stenosis within the stent of the main vessel in all three stent types. Kissing balloon inflation reduced, but never eliminated, this stenosis. The percent stenosis in the main vessel secondary to stent deformity (PS 34% +/- 9%, NIR 25% +/- 8%, Multi-Link 34% +/- 7%, NS) and residual stenosis postkissing balloon inflation (PS 12% +/- 1%, NIR 10% +/- 3%, Multi-Link 14% +/- 3%, NS) were not significantly different among these three stents. At the side-branch ostium, the MLD and CSA were significantly greater for the Multi-Link stent compared with those of the Palmaz-Schatz or NIR stent. Balloon inflation through the stent struts caused stent deformity that resulted in stenosis within the stent in the main vessel. Kissing balloon inflation reduced this stenosis, but some residual stenosis always remained. The stenoses within the main vessel did not differ among the three stent types. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 48:230-234, 1999.     

The AST petal dedicated bifurcation stent: first-in-human experience.

The aim of this first-in-human study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the novel AST petal side-access bifurcation stent. Outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcations remain inferior to those of nonbifurcated lesions. Even with drug-eluting stents, restenosis occurs especially at the side-branch (SB) ostium. The petal stent uniquely deploys strut elements into the SB, supporting the ostium and carina. The primary endpoint of this 13-patient prospective registry was in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Secondary end points included acute minimum lumen diameter (MLD) at the SB ostium, lesion success, device success, procedural success, 30-day MACE, and 4-month SB ostial MLD. The study lesion was successfully treated in 13 patients with the study stent being successfully implanted in 12. Target lesions were left anterior descending coronary artery in nine subjects, left circumflex in three, and right coronary artery in one. In-hospital MACE were limited to two non-Q-wave myocardial infarctions. In-stent main branch MLD increased from a mean of 0.63 +/- 0.45 mm to 2.61 +/- 0.47 mm at the index procedure and for this initial bare metal version of the stent, 4-month mean MLD measured 1.02 +/- 0.42 mm and there was target vessel revascularization on two patients. The feasibility of safely deploying this first-generation petal stent was demonstrated in selected patients with challenging coronary bifurcation lesions. It is a promising platform for drug delivery, with unique scaffolding of the side-branch ostium.     

Assessment with optical coherence tomography of a new strategy for bifurcational lesion treatment: The Tryton Side‐Branch Stent

The Tryton‐Side Branch Stent? (Tryton Medical, Inc., Newton, MA, USA) is a dedicated stent designed to provide complete carinal coverage of bifurcational lesions. After implantation of a 18 mm cobalt chromium Tryton stent from the left circumflex into the obtuse marginal branch, recrossing with an everolimus eluting Promus stent and final kissing balloon dilatation, optical coherence tomography (OCT) (LightLab Imaging Inc., Westford, MA, USA) was performed with a non‐occlusive technique with motorized pullback (3 mm/s) during continuous pump injection of iso‐osmolar contrast, in both LCx and OM1. OCT imaging showed good strut apposition at the level of the carina, with full coverage and no stent protrusion at the ostium of the side branch. Few malapposed struts were present in the proximal main vessel in the segment of stent superimposition, with a maximal separation from to the vessel wall of 160 μm. The implantation of the Tryton‐Side Branch Stent? allowed full coverage of the side branch ostium with uniform apposition of the stent struts at the level of the carina assessed by OCT. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Drug‐eluting stents in bifurcation lesions: To stent one branch or both?

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare two techniques to treat bifurcation lesions: a single drug-eluting stent (DES) implanted in the main branch combined with balloon dilatation for the side branch vs. stenting of both branches (double stent). BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention in coronary bifurcation lesions remains challenging. Although DES reduce restenosis in lesions, the double stent procedure has not shown clear advantages over a single stent with balloon dilation. METHODS: Fifty-three symptomatic patients with true bifurcation lesions were treated using either the double stent technique (n = 25) or one stent in the parent vessel plus balloon angioplasty of the side branch (n = 28). Procedural results and major adverse cardiac event rates (MACE: cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization (TVR)) were compared. RESULTS: Angiographic procedural success (residual stenosis <30% in both branches) was 75% in the single stent group and 100% in the double stent group (P = 0.01). All differences were due to residual stenosis of the side branch. Clinical follow-up (6-18 months) was available for all patients; 90.5% of patients had a coronary angiography or nuclear stress test. Three patients (11%) in the single stent group and two (8%) in the double stent group had ischemia-driven TVR (P = NS). Asymptomatic angiographic restenosis (>50% diameter stenosis) in the ostium of the side branch was seen in two patients in the double-stent group. At 6 months, MACE-free was comparable between groups (89.3% vs. 88%, P = 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: When treating bifurcation lesions with sirolimus-eluting stents, restenosis following a single stent procedure is comparable to stenting both parent and side branch vessels. Thus, stenting the main-branch lesion, coupled with balloon angioplasty in the side branch, produces a high success rate and good clinical outcomes at 6 months.     

Simple and complex stent strategies for bifurcated coronary arterial stenosis involving the side branch origin

Coronary lesions located in major bifurcations constitute a challenge for the use of stents. Although the occlusion of a side branch covered by a stent is infrequent, the maintenance of a patent, stenosis-free bifurcation may result in a complex procedure. Between September 1994 and April 1998, 70 patients were treated by stent implantation for coronary bifurcation stenosis. The side branch always had a diameter >2 mm. The pairs of treated arteries were: left anterior descending (LAD)/diagonal artery in 32 patients, circumflex/obtuse marginal in 26, right coronary/posterior descending artery in 5, and LAD/circumflex in 7. We applied 2 different techniques of stent implantation: (1) deployment of 1 stent in the parent vessel covering the takeoff of the side branch and subsequent angioplasty of the side branch across the metallic structure (group A, n = 47 patients), and (2) implantation of 1 stent at the ostium of the side branch and complete reconstruction of the entire bifurcation with additional implantation of 1 or 2 stents at the parent vessel (group B, n = 23 patients). There were no significant differences between groups at baseline variables. Procedural success was similar in both groups: 42 (89%) in group A versus 21 (91%) in group B. However, major cardiac events at 18 months follow-up were higher in group B (event-free probability 44% vs 75%, p <0.05). Selected patients with coronary stenosis at major bifurcations can be treated with an acceptable rate of primary and late success. Complex techniques providing radical stent reconstruction of the bifurcation seems to provide no advantages over the simpler stent jail followed by ostial side branch balloon dilation.     

Immediate results of bifurcational stenting assessed with optical coherence tomography

Background : A tubular stent may adapt with difficulty to coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs). Methods : Time domain or frequency domain (FD) optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed to assess strut apposition immediately after stent implantation across four segments inside the bifurcation, in a consecutive series of patients. OCT pullbacks were performed in the main vessel (MV). Results : A total of 13,142 struts in 45 CBL in 41 patients were assessed. Strut malapposition was significantly more frequent in the half bifurcation facing the side‐branch (SB) ostium (42.9%) than in the proximal segment of the bifurcation 11.8%, half bifurcation opposite the SB 6.7%, or the distal segment 5.7% (all P < 0.0001). Lesions (n = 15) treated with stenting of both MV and SB had a total higher rate of malapposition than those (n = 30) treated with stenting of the MV only (17.6% vs. 9.5%; P = 0.0014). In latter group, lesions treated with FD‐OCT‐guided stent implantation (n = 13) presented a lower rate of malapposition than those treated with conventional angiographic‐guided stent implantation (n = 17) (7.1% vs. 17.5%; P = 0.005). Conclusions : In CBL, strut malapposition is particularly high at the SB ostium. However, a strategy of stenting MV only with adjunctive FD‐OCT guidance is associated with lower rates of malapposition. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

光学相干断层成像评价药物洗脱支架置入术后晚期支架贴壁不良

目的 探讨药物洗脱支架(DES)置入术后晚期支架贴壁不良的特点.方法 分析32例(包括51支血管、共置入71个支架)置入DES 1年后[(14.8±5.2)个月]行光学相干断层成像(OCT)检查的患者资料,对支架节段的OCT图像每间隔0.5 mm取1帧图像进行分析,找出贴壁不良的支架金属结构,测量支架到参照血管内壁的距离及支架表面内膜厚度,分析晚期支架贴壁不良的特点.结果 OCT检查在7例(21.9%)患者中检出支架贴壁不良,其中4例合并支架段血管的正性重构,1例重叠置入支架,2例发现由血栓覆盖支架金属结构,7例患者随访期间无心脏不良事件发生.97.6%的支架金属结构完全贴壁并不同程度的内膜覆盖,2.4%的支架金属结构贴壁不良,包括1.2%的支架金属结构位于血管分支开口.位于血管分支开口的支架金属结构与其他贴壁不良支架表面的内膜覆盖厚度差异无统计学意义[(0.06±0.05)mm比(0.05±0.03)mm,P>0.05].绪论晚期支架贴壁不良见于DES置入最初的贴壁不良、血管壁正性重构、重叠置入支架以及支架金属结构位于分支血管开口;贴壁不良的支架金属结构表面亦有不同程度的内膜覆盖.     

A modified balloon crush approach improves side branch access and side branch stent apposition during crush stenting of coronary bifurcation lesions.

OBJECTIVES: Despite the advent of drug eluting stents and newer interventional techniques designed to treat the main vessel and side branch in bifurcation stenoses, optimal treatment of the side branch remains problematic. We aimed to assess the feasibility of a modified balloon crush technique for percutaneous treatment of coronary bifurcation stenoses. BACKGROUND: Use of the crush technique in bifurcation stenoses remains limited by access to the side branch after main vessel stent deployment, as well as limitations of side branch stent deployment. The modified balloon crush technique aims to improve side branch access and stent apposition. METHODS: The modified balloon crush is similar to the previously described balloon crush technique. Following side branch stent deployment, a balloon positioned in the main vessel is deployed to crush the proximal side branch stent. A guide wire is then placed into the side branch with a subsequent high-pressure balloon inflation at the side branch ostium. This opens the stent struts at the ostium of the side branch, facilitating future passage of the guide wire following main vessel stent deployment, prior to kissing balloon inflation. RESULTS: We performed this modification of the crush technique safely in 10 patients. We were successful in obtaining side branch access in nine of ten patients following initial main vessel stent deployment. In the only failure, there was a 90 degrees angle between the main vessel and side branch. CONCLUSIONS: The modified balloon crush technique can be safely performed, while optimizing side branch access and side branch stent apposition.     

Simultaneous kissing drug-eluting stent technique for percutaneous treatment of bifurcation lesions in large-size vessels.

Treatment of bifurcation lesions is associated with high procedural complications and restenosis rate due to plaque shift, suboptimal angiographic results, difficulty in crossing the stent struts, and incomplete coverage of the side-branch ostium. The simultaneous kissing stent (SKS) technique involves two stents, one in main vessel (MV) and one in the side branch (SB) with overlapping stents in the MV proximally, extending proximally the carina of bifurcation. We analyzed our first 200 consecutive patients (202 lesions) who underwent SKS technique for true bifurcation lesions using sirolimus eluting stents, with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Procedural success was 100% for MV and 99% for SB using SKS technique, with clinical success rate of 97%. In-hospital and 30-day major adverse cardiac events were 3% and 5%, respectively, with a procedure time of 36 +/- 14 min. At mean follow-up of 9 +/- 2 months, the incidence of target lesion revascularization was 4% in the entire group. Therefore, SKS technique using sirolimus-eluting stents may become an effective treatment strategy for large-size bifurcation lesions. However, in order to establish its superiority, SKS technique needs to be compared in a randomized manner with conventional stent techniques.     

Transverse partial stent ablation with rotational atherectomy for suboptimal culotte technique in left main stem bifurcation

Longitudinal rotational atherectomy of metal struts is well described as bail‐out strategy to treat undilatable instent restenosis. Ablation of metal stent struts jailing the ostium of a major side branch in a coronary bifurcation is not described. In the current report, we describe a case of “transverse” rotational atherectomy to treat a failure of culotte stenting in a left main stem bifurcation. We document for the first time in vivo and in man the effect of this strategy using optical coherence tomography.     

Stenting of bifurcation lesions: a rational approach

The occurrence of stenosis in or next to coronary bifurcations is relatively frequent and generally underestimated. In our experience, such lesions account for 15%-18% of all percutaneous coronary intervention > (PCI). The main reasons for this are (1) the coronary arteries are like the branches of a tree with many ramifications and (2) because of axial plaque redistribution, especially after stent implantation, PCI of lesions located next to a coronary bifurcation almost inevitably cause plaque shifting in the side branches. PCI treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions remains challenging. Balloon dilatation treatment used to be associated with less than satisfactory immediate results, a high complication rate, and an unacceptable restenosis rate. The kissing balloon technique resulted in improved, though suboptimal, outcomes. Several approaches were then suggested, like rotative or directional atherectomy, but these techniques did not translate into significantly enhanced results. With the advent of second generation stents, in 1996, the authors decided to set up an observational study on coronary bifurcation stenting combined with a bench test of the various stents available. Over the last 5 years, techniques, strategies, and stent design have improved. As a result, the authors have been able to define a rational approach to coronary bifurcation stenting. This bench study analyzed the behavior of stents and allowed stents to be discarded that are not compatible with the treatment of coronary bifurcations. Most importantly, this study revealed that stent deformation due to the opening of a strut is a constant phenomenon that must be corrected by kissing balloon inflation. Moreover, it was observed that the opening of a stent strut into a side branch could permit the stenting, at least partly, of the side branch ostium. This resulted in the provocative concept of "stenting both branches with a single stent." Therefore, a simple approach is currently implemented in the majority of cases: stenting of the main branch with provisional stenting of the side branch. The technique consists of inserting a guidewire in each coronary branch. A stent is then positioned in the main branch with a wire being "jailed" in the side branch. The wires are then exchanged, starting with the main branch wire that is passed through the stent struts into the side branch. After opening the stent struts in the side branch, kissing balloon inflation is performed. A second stent is deployed in the side branch in the presence of suboptimal results only. Over the last 2 years, this technique has been associated with a 98% angiographic success rate in both branches. Two stents are used in 30%-35% of cases and final kissing balloon inflation is performed in > 95% of cases. The in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rate is around 5% and 7-month target vessel revascularization (TVR) is 13%. Several stents specifically designed for coronary bifurcation lesions are currently being investigated. The objective is to simplify the approach for all users. In the near future, the use of drug-eluting stents should reduce the risk of restenosis.     

Percutaneous coronary intervention for major bifurcation lesions using the simple approach: risk of myocardial infarction

Background Recent data has suggested that simple (main vessel only) stenting is the preferred approach for patients with bifurcation lesions. We sought to determine the feasibility and outcomes of this approach in a year long inclusive registry. Methods From August, 2004–2005, a registry of 1,600 consecutive patients undergoing PCI was reviewed. Patients undergoing PCI for major bifurcation lesions––≥70% stenosis in a major (≥2 mm) side branch and/or main vessel––were identified by review of the angiograms. Angiographic, clinical and treatment predictors of final SB compromise (≥70% stenosis and/or less than TIMI 3 final flow) were identified. Results Hundred and fifty eight patients who underwent initial stenting of the main vessel with subsequent rescue of the side branch if SB compromise occurred (“Provisional Main Vessel Stenting”) comprised the analysis population. Permanent SB compromise occurred in 16% of patients and was associated with an increased risk of large periprocedural MI and renal failure. Independent predictors of permanent SB compromise were lack of pre-PCI beta blockers, presence of diabetes mellitus, main vessel eccentric lesion and small SB vessel diameter. Conclusion Among unselected patients with major bifurcation lesions undergoing a “simple” stenting approach, there is a significant rate of large periprocedural infarction and side branch compromise.     

Long-term outcome of simultaneous kissing stenting technique with sirolimus-eluting stent for large bifurcation coronary lesions.

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of simultaneous kissing stenting with sirolimus-eluting stent (SES). BACKGROUND: Percutaneous intervention for bifurcation coronary lesions is still challenging. METHODS: This study was designed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of 36 consecutive patients with large bifurcation coronary lesions who underwent simultaneous kissing stenting with SES. RESULTS: Lesion location was unprotected left main in 29 patients (81%) and anterior descending artery in 7 (19%). The patients received a combination of aspirin and clopidogrel for 6 months and cilostazol for 1 month. Mean proximal reference diameter was 4.05 +/- 0.68 mm. Compared with the side branch (SB), the main vessel (MV) involved longer lesions (25.8 +/- 17.0 mm vs. 10.2 +/- 10.8 mm, P < 0.001) and smaller preprocedural minimal lumen diameters (1.02 +/- 0.53 mm vs. 1.46 +/- 0.78 mm, P = 0.006) and was treated with larger stents (3.1 +/- 0.3 mm vs. 3.0 +/- 0.3 mm, P = 0.006). Angiographic success rate was 100%. Over the follow-up of 26.7 +/- 8.6 months, no deaths, myocardial infarctions or stent thromboses occurred. Target lesion revascularization was performed in five patients (14%). Overall angiographic restenosis occurred in 5/30 patients (17%), consisting of 4 (13%) at MV and 3 (10%) at SB. At follow-up angiography, a membranous diaphragm at the carina was identified in 14 patients (47%), but only one of whom was associated with angiographic restenosis. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous kissing stenting with SES appears a feasible stenting technique in large bifurcation coronary lesions. However, a new angiographic structure of carinal membrane developed in a half of patients at follow-up and its influence needs to be further investigated.