Associations between food insecurity, supplemental nutrition assistance program (SNAP) benefits, and body mass index among adult females

Obesity disproportionately affects low-income and minority individuals and has been linked with food insecurity, particularly among women. More research is needed to examine potential mechanisms linking obesity and food insecurity. Therefore, this study's purpose was to examine cross-sectional associations between food insecurity, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits per household member, perceived stress, and body mass index (BMI) among female SNAP participants in eastern North Carolina (n=202). Women were recruited from the Pitt County Department of Social Services between October 2009 and April 2010. Household food insecurity was measured using the validated US Department of Agriculture 18-item food security survey module. Perceived stress was measured using the 14-item Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale. SNAP benefits and number of children in the household were self-reported and used to calculate benefits per household member. BMI was calculated from measured height and weight (as kg/m²). Multivariate linear regression was used to examine associations between BMI, SNAP benefits, stress, and food insecurity while adjusting for age and physical activity. In adjusted linear regression analyses, perceived stress was positively related to food insecurity (P<0.0001), even when SNAP benefits were included in the model. BMI was positively associated with food insecurity (P=0.04). Mean BMI was significantly greater among women receiving <$150 in SNAP benefits per household member vs those receiving ≥$150 in benefits per household member (35.8 vs 33.1; P=0.04). Results suggest that provision of adequate SNAP benefits per household member might partially ameliorate the negative effects of food insecurity on BMI.     

An Increase in SNAP Benefits Did Not Impact Food Security or Diet Quality in Youth

BackgroundLow diet quality during childhood and adolescence is associated with adverse health outcomes later in life. Diet quality is generally poor in American youth, particularly in youth of low socioeconomic status. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the primary safety net to help low-income households afford a healthy diet. Yet self-selection into the program creates challenges in estimating the relationship between SNAP and diet outcomes.ObjectiveThis study examined how the increase in SNAP benefits during the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) affected food security and diet quality in low-income youth.DesignThis analysis used a difference-in-differences design and data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2008 to 2011-2012 waves.Participants/settingThe sample included children and adolescents aged 2 to 18 years with household income ≤250% of the Federal Poverty Line. Food security and diet outcomes in SNAP-eligible youth (n = 2,797) were examined, with children in nearly SNAP-eligible households serving as a comparison group (n = 1,169). The diet quality analysis stratified the sample by age range.Main outcome measuresThe study assessed food security and 6 dietary outcomes: 2 nutrients (sodium and fiber), 3 food categories (fruit, vegetables, and sugar-sweetened beverages), and 1 measure of overall diet quality (Healthy Eating Index 2010).Statistical analysis performedLogistic regression and linear regression were used to estimate the relationship between SNAP eligibility and child food security and diet.ResultsIn unadjusted analysis, approximately 64% of SNAP-eligible children were food secure before ARRA and 73% were food secure while ARRA was in effect. Using logistic regression in a difference-in-differences framework, the ARRA SNAP benefit increase was not significantly associated with food security (odds ratio 1.37, P = 0.43). Diet quality of SNAP-eligible children was low, scoring a 46 out of 100 on the Healthy Eating Index 2010. Measures of diet quality did not significantly change from the pre-ARRA period to the ARRA period; this did not differ by age range.ConclusionsThe increase in SNAP benefits during ARRA did not significantly impact food security or diet quality in low-income children and adolescents. Additional research to better understand how SNAP benefits impact dietary choice is warranted.     

Unemployment,SNAP Enrollment,and Food Insecurity Before and After California's COVID-19 Shutdown

ObjectivesTo examine whether the decrease in very low food security (VLFS) observed in California shortly after California's coronavirus disease (COVID-19) shutdown remained throughout Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2020. To investigate associations among unemployment, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) enrollment, and VLFS across FFY 2020.MethodsTelephone interview responses from mothers from randomly sampled households from low-income areas throughout California to the 6-item US Department of Agriculture Food Security Survey Module identified VLFS families. Logistic regression examined VLFS rates before vs after California's COVID-19 shutdown, with race/ethnicity, age, and education as covariates. Pearson correlations were calculated for unemployment, SNAP enrollment, and VLFS.ResultsMost (66.4%) of the 2,682 mothers were Latina. VLFS declined from 19.3% before to 14.5% after California's COVID-19 shutdown (adjusted odds ratio, 0.705; P = 0.002). The correlation for unemployment and SNAP household participation was 0.854 (P = 0.007), and for SNAP participation and VLFS was −0.869 (P = 0.005).Conclusions and ImplicationsPublicly-funded assistance programs may lower food insecurity, even during a time of increased economic hardship. Examining the specific factors responsible for the observed decline in VLFS has merit. Whether VLFS remains below the rate observed before California's COVID-19 shutdown is worthy of ongoing study.     

The Use of Charitable Food Assistance Among Low-Income Households in the United States

BackgroundAbout 11% of US households are food insecure, and many of those households seek charitable food assistance (CFA). However, little is understood about the nutritional composition of the diets of households receiving CFA, or the relationship between CFA and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) usage among low-income households.ObjectiveThe aim of the study was to compare the nutritional quality of foods obtained by CFA clients to those of similar nonclients. Furthermore, the study examined the timing of CFA use relative to the timing of SNAP use among CFA clients during the week.Design/participantsAnalyses were conducted using 2012 US Department of Agriculture National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey (FoodAPS), which collected data for 4826 households’ food acquisitions during a 7-day survey week. Sixty-seven households reported using CFAs during the survey week.Main outcomes measureThe nutritional quality of food was measured by the ratios between food acquisition quantities and the US Department of Agriculture Thrifty Food Plan consumption recommendations. The date of SNAP use was compared with that of CFA use for CFA clients who were also SNAP recipients.Statistical analyses performedPropensity score matching was utilized to construct a matching sample of CFA clients and nonclients. T tests were used to compare the means of variables.ResultsCFA clients were more likely to be food insecure (48% vs 28%, P < .001) and less likely to have access to a car (61.2% vs 84.8%, P < .001) than CFA nonclients. CFAs represent an important source of foods for CFA clients, taking up 28% of their total food at home acquisitions. CFA clients obtained more nonstarchy vegetables than matched nonclients. Furthermore, among the 45% of CFA clients who also participated in SNAP, the majority (52.4%) of them used SNAP benefits within 10 days of SNAP benefits distribution while most (67.9%) of those households used CFAs starting on day 11 or later after SNAP benefits were allocated.ConclusionsCFAs provide a substantial portion of the diets of their clients and, in particular, for foods that constitute components of healthy diets. For the proportion of CFA clients who received SNAP, this study finds evidence that CFA clients relied more on CFAs when their SNAP benefits were likely to run low.     

Food Insecurity and Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption Among WIC-Enrolled Families in the First 1,000 Days

ObjectiveDetermine the association between household food insecurity and habitual sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption among Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)–enrolled families during the first 1,000 days.MethodsCross-sectional analysis of pregnant women and mothers of infants aged under 2 years in the WIC was performed. Families recruited sequentially at consecutive visits completed food insecurity and beverage intake questionnaires; estimated logistic regression models controlled for sociodemographic characteristics.ResultsOf 394 Hispanic/Latino mothers and 281 infants, 63% had household food insecurity. Food insecurity significantly increased odds of habitual maternal (unadjusted odds ratio (OR), 2.39; 95% CI, 1.27–4.47; P = .01) and infant SSB consumption (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.15–3.65; P = .02), and the relationship was not attenuated by maternal age, education, or foreign-born status.Conclusions and ImplicationsFood insecurity increased odds of habitual SSB consumption in WIC families. Interventions to curb SSB consumption among WIC-enrolled families in the first 1,000 days in the context of household food insecurity are needed.     

Food-Seeking Behaviors and Food Insecurity Risk During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic

ObjectiveFood insecurity risk increases among disaster-struck individuals. The authors employed the social determinants of health framework to (1) describe the characteristics and food-seeking behaviors of individuals coping with the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and (2) evaluate the relationship between these factors and food insecurity risk.DesignA cross-sectional Qualtrics survey was administered May 14–June 8, 2020.ParticipantsAdults living in New York were recruited online (n = 410).Main Outcome MeasureFood insecurity risk.AnalysisLogistic regression analyses were conducted using a model-building approach.ResultsA total of 38.5% of the sample was considered food insecure after the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak. The final model revealed that not knowing where to find help to acquire food, reporting that more food assistance program benefits would be helpful, being an essential worker, having general anxiety, and being a college student were risk factors for food insecurity regardless of demographic characteristics.Conclusions and ImplicationsWith more individuals experiencing food insecurity for the first time, there is a need for enhanced outreach and support. The findings complement emerging research on food insecurity risk during and after the pandemic and can help to inform food assistance programs and policies.     

Food insecurity of people with disabilities who were Medicare beneficiaries during the COVID-19 pandemic

BackgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, 54 million people in the United States were food insecure (2020). People with disabilities (PWD) who were Medicare beneficiaries were especially vulnerable to food insecurity prior to the pandemic.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to explore COVID-19 pandemic food insecurity among PWD who were Medicare beneficiaries.MethodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of the United States Census Bureau COVID-19 Household Pulse Survey data about the food security of 70,171 PWD who were Medicare beneficiaries (under 65), and a comparison group of 1.1 million non-Medicare beneficiaries (under 65). Data were weighted using frequency person-weights.ResultsOnly 44.3% of PWD who were Medicare beneficiaries had enough of the foods they wanted to eat during the pandemic. Reasons for food insecurity included: could not afford to purchase more food (56.9%); stores did not have the food they wanted (31.4%); afraid to go out to get more food (30.0%); could not get out to get more food (21.5%); and could not get food delivered (8.5%). PWD who were Medicare beneficiaries were more likely to be food insecure than non-Medicare beneficiaries. There were also disparities in food insecurity among PWD who were Medicare beneficiaries themselves with household size, Medicaid beneficiaries, gender, race, education, martial status, household income, and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) all impacting food security.ConclusionsA multipronged approach that addresses not only food-related public health, but also other systems and structures is critical to end food insecurity.     

“Now I Feel a Little Bit More Secure”: The Impact of SNAP Enrollment on Older Adult SSI Recipients

In June 2019, California expanded Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) eligibility to Supplemental Security Income (SSI) beneficiaries for the first time. This research assesses the experience and impact of new SNAP enrollment among older adult SSI recipients, a population characterized by social and economic precarity. We conducted semi-structured, in-depth interviews with 20 SNAP participants to explore their experiences with new SNAP benefits. Following initial coding, member-check groups allowed for participants to provide feedback on preliminary data analysis. Findings demonstrate that SNAP enrollment improved participants’ access to nutritious foods of their choice, contributed to overall budgets, eased mental distress resulting from poverty, and reduced labor spent accessing food. For some participants, SNAP benefit amounts were too low to make any noticeable impact. For many participants, SNAP receipt was associated with stigma, which some considered to be a social “cost” of poverty. Increased benefit may be derived from pairing SNAP with other public benefits. Together, the impacts of and barriers to effective use of SNAP benefits gleaned from this study deepen our understanding of individual- and neighborhood-level factors driving health inequities among low-income, disabled people experiencing food insecurity and SNAP recipients.     

Persistent and Episodic Food Insecurity and Associated Coping Strategies Among College Students

ObjectiveTo determine the rates of episodic and persistent food insecurity among college students and whether coping strategies employed differs on the basis of food security status.DesignOnline cross-sectional survey administered in March 2021.SettingA large Midwestern university.ParticipantsA random sample of students (n = 5,000) were invited to participate via email with a response rate of 20% (n = 888).Main Outcome MeasuresFood insecurity was assessed using the 10-item US Department of Agriculture Adult Food Security Survey Module. Food acquisition and management coping strategies were measured using modified questionnaires.AnalysisPearson's chi-squared tests, 1-way ANOVAs, and post hoc analyses were conducted to examine associations of sociodemographic factors and coping strategies with food security status. Linear regression models were used to estimate the association between the coping strategies scale and subscales with food insecurity status.ResultsThe food insecurity rate was 22%, with 11% and 10% of students experiencing episodic and persistent food insecurity, respectively. Coping strategies varied significantly by food security status (P < 0.001), with students facing persistent food insecurity employing coping strategies most frequently.Conclusions and ImplicationsFuture research is needed to better understand the persistent nature of food insecurity and coping strategies to develop tailored policies and programs for the college student population.     

COVID-19 Benefits and Dietary Behaviors Among Mothers From Low-Income,Food-Insecure Households

ObjectiveTo examine the dietary behaviors of mothers from very low food security (VLFS) households following the availability of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) unemployment and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits.MethodsDiet and food security status were obtained from 2,584 California mothers during Federal Fiscal Year 2020. Fruits, vegetables, and 100% fruit juice (FV100%FJ), sugar-sweetened beverages, and water intake, and Healthy Eating Index-2015 scores, were compared across 4 groups (before vs after COVID-19 benefits by VLFS vs non-VLFS households) with race/ethnicity and age as covariates.ResultsBefore COVID-19 benefits, VLFS was associated with fewer cups of FV100%FJ (P = 0.010), more fluid ounces of sugar-sweetened beverages (P = 0.004), and poorer diet quality (P = 0.003). After COVID-19 benefits, mothers from VLFS vs non-VLFS households reported similar dietary outcomes. VLFS mothers reported 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.53–1.38) more cups of FV100%FJ after COVID-19 benefits.Conclusions and ImplicationsCoronavirus disease 2019 benefits may have reduced dietary inequities among low-income families. Associations between increased Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and unemployment benefits and decreased costs associated with the negative health outcomes linked to food insecurity and poor diets would be of value.     

Household Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participation is Associated With Higher Fruit and Vegetable Consumption

ObjectiveExamine whether differences were present by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participation in dietary patterns, achievement of dietary recommendations, and food security for children (aged 7–18 years) receiving free/reduced-price school meals.MethodsCross-sectional study. Caregiver–child dyads at a pediatric clinic completed validated surveys. Food security, dietary patterns, and achievement of dietary recommendations were compared between child SNAP participants/nonparticipants.ResultsAmong 205 caregivers, 128 (62.4%) reported SNAP participation. Percentages of child SNAP participants/nonparticipants meeting recommendations were largely nonsignificantly different and overwhelmingly low. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participants reported higher mean daily servings of vegetables (P = 0.01) and fruits (P = 0.01) than nonparticipants. Caregiver-reported household food security was not significantly different between SNAP participants and nonparticipants (P = 0.44).Conclusions and ImplicationsIn this study, child-reported fruit/vegetable intakes were significantly higher among SNAP participants than nonparticipants, suggesting child SNAP participants may experience small but noteworthy benefits related to fruit/vegetable consumption. Additional supports are needed to achieve dietary recommendations.     

Qualitative Evaluation of Drivers of Eating Decisions among SNAP Participants in Mississippi

ObjectiveTo explore food-related decision patterns among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients in Mississippi.DesignA qualitative design was used to conduct focus groups (n = 18) based on the Health Belief Model with low-income female caregivers of children aged under 13 years.SettingMississippi.ParticipantsCluster sampling was used to recruit participants (n = 126) from the 4 regional divisions of Mississippi State University Extension.Phenomenon of InterestDrivers of eating decisions among SNAP participants.AnalysisFocus groups were recorded, transcribed, and coded by 2 independent coders using thematic analysis.ResultsDrivers of food selection often overlapped with barriers to healthy eating. Participants used many strategies to manage costs and viewed healthy foods as out of reach and quick to perish. Cost, taste preferences, habits, and family factors were primary drivers of food selection and preparation; each of these presented barriers to healthier eating. Health was most often shared as a driver of food selection once disease was established. Participants reported a variety of strategies used in striving for healthier eating.Conclusions and ImplicationsFocusing on ways to manage the costs of healthy foods, honor taste preferences, and work within habits/families may enhance efforts to support healthy eating among SNAP participants.     

Newly Food-Insecure College Students in Appalachia During the COVID-19 Pandemic

ObjectiveThis study investigated if the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic influenced college student food insecurity and factors that might contribute to a student becoming newly food insecure.DesignA convenience sample was assessed using a cross-sectional survey.SettingOnline.ParticipantsCollege students (n = 2,018) enrolled at a land-grant institution in Appalachia.Main Outcome Measure(s)Food insecurity was assessed using the Hunger Vital Sign with reference before COVID-19 and since COVID-19. Demographic and pandemic-specific questions and their associations with food insecurity status were assessed.AnalysisStudents were categorized as food secure (food secure before and since COVID-19 or food insecure in the year before COVID-19 but not food insecure since COVID-19), consistently food insecure (food insecure before and since COVID-19), and newly food insecure (food secure before but food insecure since COVID-19). Multivariate logistic regression was used to investigate the relationship between new food insecurity and contributing factors.ResultsOf respondents, 68.4% were food secure, 16.5% were consistently food insecure, and 15.1% were newly food insecure. Loss of employment, increased grocery expenditure, anxiety, and a perceived threat posed by COVID-19 were significant indicators of students being newly food insecure.Conclusions and ImplicationsMore students were facing food insecurity as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Continued advocacy for sustainable solutions to college food insecurity is needed.     

Bidirectional Relationship Between Food Insecurity and Housing Instability

BackgroundDue to the commonality of material hardship, food insecurity and housing instability are highly correlated. There is a need to assess the bidirectional relationship between food insecurity and housing instability over time.ObjectivesTo examine the potential bidirectional associations between food insecurity and housing instability over a 2-year period.DesignTwo time points from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study were used to conduct an analysis on 2368 families.Participants/settingAt baseline (1998-2000), researchers recruited primarily unmarried mothers after giving birth from 75 hospitals in 20 cities across the United States. Participants were followed up when the child was 3 years old (2001-2003) and 5 years old (2003-2005).Main outcomes measuredFood insecurity was assessed using the 18-item US Department of Agriculture’s Food Security Survey. Housing instability was assessed using 6 items that describe housing related hardship.Statistical analyses performedCross-lagged path analyses using structural equation modeling were conducted to test bidirectional relationship of food insecurity and housing instability over time, controlling for sociodemographic characteristics.ResultsFamilies who experienced food insecurity at time 1 were 62% higher odds of experiencing housing instability at time 2 (odds ratio: 1.624, B = 0.485, 95% confidence interval: 0.199, 0.778), controlling for time 1 housing instability, concurrent food insecurity, and covariates. Families who experienced housing instability at time 1 were 40% increased odds of experiencing food insecurity at time 2 (odds ratio: 1.404, B = 0.339, 95% confidence interval: 0.071, 0.619), controlling for food insecurity at time 1, concurrent housing instability, and covariates.ConclusionsThe relationships between food insecurity and housing instability were highly correlated over time, controlling for covariates that are associated with socioeconomic status. Currently, programs designed to reduce food insecurity and housing instability function in isolation. Consolidating antipoverty programs or increasing referrals to various programs may help to reduce these 2 types of economic hardships.     

Food insecurity and food choices in rural older adults with diabetes receiving nutrition education via telemedicine

ObjectiveTo evaluate differences between rural older adults with diabetes reporting the presence or absence of food insecurity with respect to meal planning, preparation, shopping, obesity, and glycemic control after receiving nutrition counseling through telemedicine.MethodsFood insecurity data were obtained by telephone survey (n = 74). Group differences for continuous variables were measured by t tests; categorical variables by Pearson chi-square tests.ResultsParticipants reporting mild food insecurity (23%) had higher body mass index (35.5 ± 7.1 kg/m² vs 30.5 ± 6.0 kg/m², P = .01) and lower household incomes (P = .03) and were more likely to consider cost of ingredients in food preparation compared to food-secure participants (P = .03). Most purchased fresh produce (97%) and considered the dietitian's advice when purchasing food. Both groups report similar adherence to dietitians' advice and had similar glycemic control.Conclusions and ImplicationsStrategies to address higher levels of obesity associated with food insecurity are needed.     

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program,Food Insecurity,Dietary Quality,and Obesity Among US Adults

Objectives. We examined whether Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participation changes associations between food insecurity, dietary quality, and weight among US adults.Methods. We analyzed adult dietary intake data (n = 8333) from the 2003 to 2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Bivariate and multivariable methods assessed associations of SNAP participation and 4 levels of food security with diet and weight. Measures of dietary quality were the Healthy Eating Index 2010, total caloric intake, empty calories, and solid fat; weight measures were body mass index (BMI), overweight, and obesity.Results. SNAP participants with marginal food security had lower BMI (1.83 kg/m²; P < .01) and lower probability of obesity (9 percentage points; P < .05). SNAP participants with marginal (3.46 points; P < .01), low (1.98 points; P < .05), and very low (3.84 points; P < .01) food security had better diets, as illustrated by the Healthy Eating Index. Associations between SNAP participation and improved diet and weight were stronger among Whites than Blacks and Hispanics.Conclusions. Our research highlights the role of SNAP in helping individuals who are at risk for food insecurity to obtain a healthier diet and better weight status.Food insecurity, broadly defined as having limited access to adequate food,1 is associated with increased stress levels and reduced overall well-being.2 In addition, food insecurity has been shown to diminish dietary quality and affect nutritional intake and has been associated with chronic morbidity (e.g., type 2 diabetes, hypertension) and weight gain.1,3–5 In 2012, approximately 14.5% of US households (17.6 million households) experienced food insecurity, of whom 5.7% (7.0 million households) experienced very low food security (i.e., reduction in food intake).6 The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), formerly known as food stamps, is the largest government assistance program in the United States and seeks to alleviate food insecurity in US households.7 SNAP has the potential to mitigate the adverse effects of food insecurity on health outcomes not only through attenuating food insecurity but also by enhancing the dietary quality of its participants.8,9Although cross-sectional studies have found no significant differences in food insecurity levels between SNAP participants and nonparticipants,10,11 in a longitudinal study, Nord observed a 28% reduction in the odds for very low food security among households that remained on SNAP throughout the year relative to those who left before the last 30 days of the year.12 In addition, studies by Leung and Villamor13 and Webb et al.14 found that independent of food insecurity, SNAP participation is associated with the increased likelihood of obesity, and other studies have observed lower dietary quality specifically among SNAP participants.15,16 Kreider et al. used partial identification bounding methods to take into account the endogenous selection and misreporting of SNAP enrollment and found that SNAP reduced the prevalence of food insecurity, poor general health, and obesity among children.17Thus, the interrelationships among SNAP participation, food insecurity, dietary quality, and weight status warrant further investigation to inform SNAP programming, policy, and outreach to ultimately improve the health and well-being of SNAP participants. We explored these relationships in data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) over multiple years. We aimed to determine mitigating effects SNAP participation might have on the association of food insecurity with dietary quality and obesity among a nationally representative sample of US adults.     

Participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and Dietary Behaviors: Role of Community Food Environment

BackgroundThe United States Department of Agriculture’s Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the country’s largest nutrition assistance program for low-income populations. Although SNAP has been shown to reduce food insecurity, research findings on the diet quality of program participants are inconsistent.ObjectiveThis study evaluated whether the community food environment is a potential moderator of the association between SNAP participation and eating behaviors.DesignThis cross-sectional study used participant data from a telephone survey of 2,211 households in four cities in New Jersey. Data were collected from two cross-sectional panels from 2009 to 2010 and 2014. Food outlet data were purchased from commercial sources and classified as supermarkets, small grocery stores, convenience stores, or limited service restaurants.Participants/settingAnalysis is limited to 983 respondents (588 SNAP participants) with household incomes below 130% of the federal poverty level.Main outcome measuresEating behaviors were assessed as frequency of consumption of fruit, vegetables, salad, and sugar-sweetened beverages.Statistical analyses performedInteraction and stratified analyses using gamma regression determined the differences in the association between SNAP participation and eating behaviors by the presence or absence of food outlets adjusted for covariates.ResultsSNAP participation was associated with a higher frequency of consuming sugar-sweetened beverages (P<0.05) when respondents lived within ¼ to ½ mile of a small grocery store, supermarket, and limited service restaurant. SNAP participants who did not live close to a convenience store reported a lower frequency of sugar-sweetened beverage consumption (P=0.01), and those living more than ½ mile away from a supermarket reported a lower frequency of fruit consumption (P=0.03).ConclusionsThe findings from this study suggest that the community food environment may play a role in moderating the association between SNAP participation and eating behaviors. Although SNAP participation is associated with some unhealthy behaviors, this association may only hold true when respondents live in certain food environments.