Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Metaplastic Breast Cancer: Response Rates,Management, and Outcomes

IntroductionNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cance has not been well studied for metaplastic breast cancer (MBC), a rare but aggressive type of breast cancer.Materials and MethodsThe National Cancer Database was queried (2004-2017) for females with cM0 MBC who received NAC and definitive surgery with a pathologic staging record. Statistics included Kaplan-Meier overall survival (OS) analysis, multivariable logistic regression, and Cox proportional hazards modeling.ResultsOf 903 MBC patients, 88 (9.8%) experienced a pathologic complete response (pCR). The vast majority of ypT0 cases were initially cT1-2. On multivariable logistic regression, cT1 disease was a single factor that was associated with pCR. The majority of patients with MBC undergoing pCR still underwent mastectomy (62.5%) and sentinel node biopsy (67.1%). Axillary dissection was more common in non-pCR cases (49.3% vs. 29.6%, P = .001). The 5 year OS difference amongst MBC patients between pCR vs. RCB1-3 was significant (93 vs. 63%, P < .001). There was no difference observed between MpBC with pCR and non-MpBC invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) with pCR (93 vs. 93%), with pCR (P > .05 for all molecular subtypes).ConclusionThis study confirms that response rates of MBC to NAC are low, with pCR being relatively infrequent. However, early-stage MBC may be more likely to achieve pCR. These findings combined with emerging research on identifying favorable histopathologic subtypes of MBC may better elucidate subsets with higher proclivity for pCR, especially because these patients achieve satisfactory survival, comparable to that of IDC with pCR.     

Identification of a subpopulation of metastatic breast cancer patients with very high HER2 expression levels and possible resistance to trastuzumab

BackgroundPatients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) overexpressing HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) are currently selected for treatment with trastuzumab, but not all patients respond.Patients and methodsUsing a novel assay, HER2 protein expression (H2T) was measured in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded primary breast tumors from 98 women treated with trastuzumab-based therapy for MBC. Using subpopulation treatment effect pattern plots, the population was divided into H2T low (H2T < 13.8), H2T high (H2T ≥ 68.5), and H2T intermediate (13.8 ≤ H2T < 68.5) subgroups. Kaplan–Meier (KM) analyses were carried out comparing the groups for time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). Cox multivariate analyses were carried out to identify correlates of clinical outcome. Bootstrapping analyses were carried out to test the robustness of the results.ResultsTTP improved with increasing H2T until, at the highest levels of H2T, an abrupt decrease in the TTP was observed. KM analyses demonstrated that patients with H2T low tumors [median TTP 4.2 months, hazard ratio (HR) = 3.7, P < 0.0001] or H2T high tumors (median TTP 4.6 months, HR = 2.7, P = 0.008) had significantly shorter TTP than patients whose tumors were H2T intermediate (median TTP 12 months). OS analyses yielded similar results.ConclusionsMBC patients with very high levels of H2T may represent a subgroup with de novo resistance to trastuzumab. These results are preliminary and require confirmation in larger controlled clinical cohorts.     

Second invasive breast cancers in patients treated with breast-conserving therapy

ObjectiveSecond breast cancers after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) include ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) and metachronous contralateral breast cancer (CBC). Each IBTR is further classified as true recurrence (TR) or new primary tumor (NP). We aim to compare survival outcomes of TR, NP and CBC, and explore the optimal treatments.Methods168,427 patients with primary breast cancer who underwent BCT between 1990 and 2005 were identified in the SEER database. The risks of IBTR and CBC were estimated by annual hazard rate. The breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were assessed using multivariable Cox regression analysis.ResultsWith median follow-up of 13 years after BCT, 5413 patients developed an IBTR and 4050 patients had a CBC. The risk of IBTR peaked between 10 and 15 years after BCT, while the risk of CBC distributed evenly. 45.9% of IBTRs were classified as a TR and 54.1% as an NP. The time interval from primary breast cancer to NP was longer than to TR and CBC (P < 0.001). Patients with TR had a poorer BCSS than NP (P = 0.003) and CBC (P = 0.002). There was no difference in BCSS between mastectomy and repeat BCT for treating TR (P = 0.584) or NP (P = 0.243). The BCSS of CBCs treated with BCT was better than mastectomy (P = 0.010). Chemotherapy didn't improve the survival of patients with TR (P = 0.058). However, TRs with grade III or negative hormone receptors benefited from chemotherapy significantly.ConclusionPatients with TR had a poorer BCSS than NP and CBC. Classifying IBTR may provide clinical significance for treatments.     

Circulating tumor cells predict progression-free and overall survival in Chinese patients with metastatic breast cancer,HER2-positive or triple-negative (CBCSG004): a multicenter,double-blind,prospective trial

BackgroundThe aim of this multicenter, double-blind, prospective study was to evaluate the potential utility of circulating tumor cell (CTC) measurements in predicting responses to anticancer therapies, including response to human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2)-targeted agents, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in Chinese women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).Patients and methodsThree hundred MBC patients planned to complete three CTC blood draws and two imaging studies.ResultsA total of 294 of the 300 MBC patients enrolled from six leading Chinese cancer centers were assessable. In multivariate Cox regression analyses, the baseline CTC number remained an independent prognostic factor for PFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.93; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.39–2.69; P < 0.001) and OS (HR = 3.76; 95% CI = 2.35–6.01; P < 0.001). Similar results were observed for CTC counts at the first follow-up visit for both PFS (P = 0.049) and OS (P < 0.001).ConclusionsEnumeration of CTCs in Chinese MBC patients provides substantial prognostic information and is an independent factor associated with PFS and OS. Moreover, we demonstrated the prognostic value in the various disease subtypes, including HER-2-positive disease irrespective of therapy.     

Elucidating Determinants of Survival Disparities Among a Real-world Cohort of Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: A National Cancer Database Analysis

BackgroundDisparities in breast cancer survival by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status have been reported. However, it is unclear if these findings are reproducible among subpopulations. This study aimed to assess if socially oriented factors are predictive of overall survival (OS) among patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR⁺), human epidermal growth factor 2-positive (HER2⁺) metastatic breast cancer (MBC).Patients and MethodsWe analyzed patients with MBC included in the National Cancer Database diagnosed with HR⁺ and HER2⁺ disease treated between 2010 and 2015. Multivariate analyses describe the association between non-clinical prognostic factors and OS. A matched analysis, which balanced prognostic factors between whites and African Americans (AA), was also conducted.ResultsOf the 6200 patients analyzed, the majority were 50 years or older, white, and treated with hormonal therapy. Disparities in OS were observed; multivariate analysis revealed diminished survival was associated with low income (< $38K vs. ≥ $63K, hazard ratio [HR], 1.30; P < .001), having government insurance (government vs. private, HR, 1.55; P < .001), living closer to one’s treatment facility (< 4 miles vs. ≥ 18 miles, HR, 1.16; P = .04), and being AA (AA vs. white, HR, 1.20; P = .006). The mortality disparity attributed to race was insignificant in the matched analysis (AA vs. white, HR, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.98-1.30; P = .09).ConclusionsThis study confirms that the known sociodemographic disparities in OS among patients with MBC are similar within the HR⁺/HER2⁺ subpopulation. The discordance of outcomes between matched and unmatched analysis demonstrate that there is a highly vulnerable subgroup of AAs. Further investigation is required to determine if the identified associations are independently causal of poor prognosis.     

The impact of postmastectomy and regional nodal radiation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for clinically lymph node-positive breast cancer: a National Cancer Database (NCDB) analysis

BackgroundFollowing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), the optimal strategies for postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) and regional nodal irradiation (RNI) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) are controversial. In this analysis, we evaluate the impact of these radiotherapy (RT) approaches for women with clinically node-positive breast cancer treated with NAC in the National Cancer Database (NCDB).Patients and methodsWomen with cT1–3 cN1 M0 breast cancer treated with NAC were divided into four cohorts by surgery [Mastectomy (Mast) versus BCS] and post-chemotherapy pathologic nodal status (ypN0 versus ypN+). Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and RT approaches were analyzed using the log-rank test, multivariate Cox models, and propensity score-matched analyses.ResultsFrom 2003 to 2011, 15 315 cases were identified including 3040 Mast-ypN0, 7243 Mast-ypN+, 2070 BCS-ypN0, and 2962 BCS-ypN+ patients. On univariate analysis, PMRT was associated with improved OS for both Mast-ypN0 (P = 0.019) and Mast-ypN+ (P < 0.001) patients. On multivariate analyses adjusted for factors including age, comorbidity score, cT stage, in-breast pathologic complete response, axillary surgery, ypN stage, estrogen receptor status and hormone therapy, PMRT remained independently associated with improved OS among Mast-ypN0 [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.729, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.566–0.939, P = 0.015] and Mast-ypN+ patients (HR = 0.772, 95% CI 0.689–0.866, P < 0.001). No differences in OS were observed with the addition of RNI to breast RT for BCS-ypN0 or BCS-ypN+ patients. Propensity score-matched analyses demonstrated identical patterns of significance. On subset analysis, OS was improved with PMRT in each pathologic nodal subgroup (ypN0, ypN1, and ypN2-3) (all P < 0.05).ConclusionsIn the largest reported analysis of RT for cN1 patients treated with NAC, PMRT was associated with improved OS for all pathologic nodal subgroups. No OS differences were observed with the addition of RNI to breast RT.     

T1-2N0M0 Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Treated With Breast-Conserving Therapy Has Better Survival Compared to Mastectomy: A SEER Population-Based Retrospective Analysis

BackgroundFor early-stage breast cancer, the two current mainstay treatments are breast-conserving therapy (BCT; lumpectomy followed by radiotherapy [RT] and BCT) and mastectomy. Generally, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is more aggressive compared to hormone receptor–positive breast cancer. We sought to investigate the effect of BCT compared to mastectomy on overall survival (OS) and breast cancer–specific survival (BCSS) in T1-2N0M0 TNBC.Patients and MethodsA population-based retrospective analysis was performed using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients included in the analysis were divided into 3 groups according to surgical modality and RT: BCT, mastectomy alone, and mastectomy with RT. The survival end points were OS and BCSS, and survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test among treatment types.ResultsA total of 14,910 female subjects with T1-2N0M0 TNBC diagnosed between 2010 and 2014 were included. A total of 7381 patients had BCT; 6967 had mastectomy alone, and 562 had mastectomy with RT. Patients treated with BCT had better OS (log-rank P < .05) and BCSS (log-rank P < .05) than those receiving mastectomy with or without RT. The 5-year OS was 88.6% for BCT, 83.0% for mastectomy alone, and 79.6% for mastectomy with RT. The 5-year BCSS was 94.3% for BCT, 93.3% for mastectomy alone, and 83.7% for mastectomy with RT.ConclusionIn patients with T1-2N0M0 TNBC, BCT was associated with superior OS and BCSS compared to mastectomy with or without RT. After mastectomy, there was no evidence of survival benefit of RT.     

Relationship between lymphocytopenia and circulating tumor cells as prognostic factors for overall survival in metastatic breast cancer

IntroductionLymphocytopenia and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have been reported as independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC), and both have been associated with bone metastases. Our objective was to compare the prognostic significance of lymphocytopenia, CTC count, and extensive bone metastases (> 2 lesions) assessed by fluorine-18 (¹⁸F) fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG–PET/CT) in patients with MBC.Patients and MethodsThis is a retrospective study that included patients with MBC who were starting a new line of systemic therapy. The study population consisted of patients treated at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2004 and 2008 for whom baseline CTC count, lymphocyte counts, and FDG–PET/CT scans were available. Patients were stratified according to estrogen receptor status (positive vs. negative), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status (amplified vs. constitutive), baseline CTC counts per 7.5 mL of blood (< 5 CTCs/7.5 mL of blood vs. ≥ 5 CTCs/7.5 mL of blood), lymphocytopenia (< 1000 vs. ≥ 1000/μL), and extensive bone metastases (> 2 vs. ≤ 2 lesions).ResultsIn 195 assessable patients, the median OS was 27 months (range, 1 to > 45 months). In multivariate analysis, lymphocytopenia, ≥ 5 CTCs/7.5 mL of blood, estrogen receptor status, and line of therapy were the only predictive factors for progression-free survival (PFS) (2P = .001, 2P = .032, 2P = .029, and 2P = .002, respectively) and OS (2P = .001, 2P = .009, 2P = .004, and 2P = .024, respectively).ConclusionCTC measurement and lymphocytopenia are independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS in patients with MBC.     

Pooled analysis of individual patient data from capecitabine monotherapy clinical trials in locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer

We assessed the efficacy and safety of capecitabine across treatment lines, and the impact of patient and disease characteristics on outcomes using data from phase II/III trials. Individual patient data were pooled from seven Roche/Genentech-led trials conducted from 1996 to 2008 where single-agent capecitabine was the test or control regimen for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Data were analyzed from 805 patients: 268 in the first-line metastatic setting and 537 in the second-line or later setting. Baseline characteristics were balanced across treatment lines. Patients receiving second-line or later versus first-line capecitabine had lower objective response rates (ORR: 19.0 vs. 25.0?%, respectively, odds ratio 0.70; 95?% CI: 0.5?C1.0) and significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS: median 112.0?days [3.7?months] vs. 150.0?days [4.9?months]; p?<?0.0001) and overall survival (OS: median 396.0?days [13.0?months] vs. 666.0?days [21.9?months]; p?<?0.0001). In multivariate analysis by backward elimination, significantly improved ORR (p?=?0.0036), PFS (p?<?0.0001) and OS (p?<?0.0001) with capecitabine were demonstrated in patients with estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PgR)-positive versus both ER and PgR-negative tumors. Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) was the most common adverse event (AE) in 63?% of patients. Overall, 7?% of patients discontinued and two patients (<1?%) died from treatment-related AEs. Significantly improved survival was observed in patients developing capecitabine-related HFS (p?<?0.0001 PFS/OS) or diarrhea (p?=?0.004 OS; p?=?0.0045 PFS) versus patients without these events. In this pooled analysis of individual patient data, first-line capecitabine was associated with improved ORR, PFS, and OS versus second or later lines. Multivariate analyses identified greater ORR, PFS, and OS with capecitabine in patients with ER and/or PgR-positive versus ER/PgR-negative tumors. Safety was in-line with previous phase III trials in MBC.     

Survival outcomes of metastatic breast cancer patients by germline BRCA1/2 status in a large multicenter real-world database

The outcomes and best treatment strategies for germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCAm) carriers with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remain uncertain. We compared the overall survival and the first line progression free survival (PFS1) of patients with a gBRCAm identified at initiation of first-line treatment with those of BRCA wild-type (WT) and not-tested (NT) individuals in the ESME real-world database of MBC patients between 2008 and 2016 (NCT03275311). Among the 20 624 eligible patients, 325 had a gBRCAm, 1138 were WT and 19 161 NT. Compared with WT, gBRCAm carriers were younger, and had more aggressive diseases. At a median follow-up of 50.5 months, median OS was 30.6 (95%CI: 21.9-34.3), 35.8 (95%CI: 32.2-37.8) and 39.3 months (95% CI: 38.3-40.3) in the gBRCAm, WT and NT subgroups, respectively. Median PFS1 was 7.9 (95%CI: 6.6-9.3), 7.8 (95%CI: 7.3-8.5) and 9.7 months (95%CI, 9.5-10.0). In the multivariable analysis conducted in the whole cohort, gBRCAm status had however no independent prognostic impact on OS and PFS1. Though, in the triple-negative subgroup, gBRCAm patients had better OS and PFS1 (HR vs WT = 0.76; 95%CI: 0.60-0.97; P = .027 and 0.69; 95% CI: 0.55-0.86; P = .001, respectively). In contrast, in patients with HR+/HER2 negative cancers, PFS1 appeared significantly and OS non significantly lower for gBRCAm carriers (PFS1: HR vs WT = 1.23; 95%CI: 1.03-1.46; P = .024; OS:HR = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.97-1.52, P = .089). In conclusion, gBRCA1/2 status appears to have divergent survival effects in MBC according to IHC subtype.     

Effect of Breast Conservation Therapy vs Mastectomy on Overall Survival and Breast Cancer-Specific Survival Among Men With Stage I-II Breast Cancer: Analysis of SEER, 2000-2018

BackgroundMale breast cancer is a rare malignant tumor, and outcomes of breast conservation therapy (BCT) are currently lacking.MethodThe retrospective, population-based cohort study included 1369 stage I-II (T1–2 N0–1 M0) male breast cancer patients from the SEER database (2000-2018). The patients were grouped in two groups: BCT group and mastectomy group, according to surgical and radiation therapy. Kaplan-Meier method and univariable Cox proportional hazard analysis were used to compare overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) between two treatment groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the confounding factors.ResultsOf the 1369 men, 97 (7%) patients received BCT, 1272 (93%) received mastectomy alone. The 5- and 10-year OS rates were 92.3% and 80.7% for BCT group compared with 80.4% and 61.4% for mastectomy group. The 5- and 10-year BCSS rates were 96.5% and 93.9% for patients undergoing BCT, as compared with 93.1% and 84.4% for patients undergoing mastectomy. Compared with mastectomy group, BCT group showed improved OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.294; 95% CI 0.138-0.623, P = .002) and BCSS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.182; 95% CI 0.040-0.820, P = .027). Of the 791 patients with T1 stage, BCT showed insignificant association with OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.555; 95% CI 0.207-1.488, P = .242) and BCSS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.217; 95% CI 0.171-8.675, P = .844).ConclusionThe results of this cohort study suggest that BCT is at least equivalent to mastectomy in male breast cancer patients. The underlying mechanism of this association needs further research.     

Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Breast Cancer in a Phase I Clinic: The M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Experience

PurposePatients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) refractory to standard therapy have a poor prognosis. We assessed prognostic factors and clinical outcomes for patients with MBC referred to a phase I clinic focused primarily on targeted agents.Patients and MethodsWe reviewed the medical records of sequential patients with MBC who presented to our phase I clinic between September 2004 and May 2008 to assess baseline patient characteristics, overall survival (OS), and clinical benefit.ResultsA total of 92 patients were identified, with a median age of 53 years (range, 28–83 years). The median number of previous therapies was 5 (range, 1–16 therapies). Of 92 patients, 78 were eligible for and offered ≥ 1 phase I clinical trial. With a median follow-up of 7.4 months, the median OS was 6.7 months (95% CI, 5.2–9.7). In multivariate analysis, independent factors predicting shorter survival were ≥ 10 previous treatments (vs. < 10 previous treatments; hazard ratio [HR], 3.27; 95% CI, 1.37–7.81; P = .008), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 2/3 (vs. 0/1; HR, 2.92; 95% CI, 1.28–6.66; P = .01), and albumin level < 3.5 g/dL (vs. > 3.5 g/dL; HR, 2.88; 95% CI, 1.41–5.89; P = .004).ConclusionPatients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer referred for our phase I studies had a median survival of 6.7 months. Heavily pretreated disease, poor ECOG PS, and/or low albumin levels were associated with significantly shorter survival in a multivariate analysis.     

Survival differences among women with de novo stage IV and relapsed breast cancer

BackgroundThe objective of this retrospective study was to determine whether differences in survival exist between women with de novo stage IV and relapsed breast cancer.Patients and methodsThree thousand five hundred and twenty-four women with de novo stage IV or relapsed breast cancer diagnosed from 1992 to 2007 were identified. Disease-free interval (DFI) was defined as the time from the diagnosis of primary nonmetastatic breast cancer to the date of the first distant metastases. Kaplan–Meier product limit method was used to estimate overall survival (OS). Cox proportional hazards model was fitted to determine the association between metastatic disease (relapsed versus de novo) and OS after controlling for other patient/tumor characteristics.ResultsSix hundred and forty-three (18.2%) women had de novo stage IV disease and 2881 (81.8%) had relapsed disease. Median follow-up was 19 months. Median OS among patients with de novo stage IV and relapsed disease was 39.2 and 27.2 months, respectively (P < 0.0001). In the multivariable model, women with relapsed disease had an increased risk of death compared with patients with de novo disease (HR = 1.75, 95% confidence interval 1.47–2.08, P < 0.0001). When the multivariable model was stratified by DFI, women with relapsed disease with DFI <6 months, ≥6 months to <2 years, or ≥2 to <5 years each had a significantly higher risk of death compared with women with de novo stage IV disease. The risk of death was not statistically different among patients with relapsed disease with DFI >5 years compared with those with de novo disease.ConclusionsThis large cohort study provides further insight into the natural history of relapsed and de novo stage IV breast cancer. DFI plays an important role in the prognosis for patients with relapsed breast cancer.     

Locoregional Recurrence and Survival Outcomes in Breast Cancer Treated With Modern Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Contemporary Population-based Analysis

BackgroundData guiding radiotherapy (RT) decisions after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is largely retrospective, based on older treatment approaches without molecular subtype information. This study evaluated outcomes in breast cancer patients treated with modern NAC by molecular subtype and locoregional treatment.Materials and MethodsThere were 949 patients diagnosed between 2005 and 2016 treated with NAC followed by surgery ± locoregional radiotherapy (LRRT). Outcomes were 7-year locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and overall survival (OS).ResultsMedian follow-up was 6.5 years, 92% had cT2-4 and 72% cN1-3 disease. Subtypes were: 21% Luminal A, 18% Luminal B, 35% Her2+, and 21% triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Combined taxane and anthracycline-based NAC was used in 91.7% of cases. All patients with Her2+ disease received anti-Her2 therapy. After NAC, the majority (84.9%) underwent mastectomy, and received LRRT (86.1%). Only 11% had mastectomy without RT. Pathologic complete response (pCR) rates were 2.5% for Luminal A, 14.4% Luminal B, 27% TNBC, and 35.1% Her2+. Overall, adjuvant LRRT was associated with improved outcomes but was most significant for improved LRRFS in TNBC (92.5% vs. 68.5%, P < .001; Her2+ 95.4% vs. 93.6%, P = .81; Luminal A 97.4% vs. 100%, P = .49; Luminal B 89.7% vs. 100%, P = .17). On multivariable analysis, factors associated with reduced LRRFS were grade 3 histology (HR 4.96, P = .009) and no pCR (HR 7.0, P = .0008). Predictors of lower BCSS and OS were age >50, grade 3, cT3-4, lack of pCR, LRRT omission, and TNBC and Her2+ subtypes.ConclusionIn this analysis of patients treated with modern NAC, pCR rates varied by molecular subtype. Patients who did not receive LRRT, particularly those with TNBC, had lower survival compared to those treated with LRRT. These findings support the need for prospective studies to evaluate the safety of de-escalating RT after NAC.     

The impact of neoadjuvant systemic therapy on breast conservation rates in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer: Surgical results from a phase II randomized controlled trial

BackgroundNeoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) induces tumor shrinkage and boosts the chance of breast-conserving thearpy (BCT) in patients with breast cancer. However, only a few trials have evaluated the effect of NST in conversion from BCT ineligibility to BCT eligibility in HER2-positive breast cancer.MethodsWe conducted the surgical sub-study of a phase II randomized trial, which compared standard neoadjuvant treatment or an experimental treatment modified according to the interim Ki-67 evaluation in women with stage II or III HER2-positive breast cancer. The treating surgeons assessed eligibility for BCT before and after NST. We evaluated the change in BCT eligibility following NST. We also analyzed the type of surgery performed and the success rate of BCT.ResultsTwo hundred six patients were included in this study. Of these, 44.0% were considered BCT candidates at baseline, while 69.8% were deemed eligible for BCT after NST (P < 0.001). Among non-BCT candidates at baseline, 46% successfully converted to BCT candidates. Of 139 patients deemed eligible for BCT following NST, 84.2% attempted BCT, and successful BCT, defined as tumor-free at all surgical margins, was achieved in 96.8% of patients. Different treatment arms did not affect the rate of post-NST BCT eligibility (70.0% vs 69.7%).ConclusionsThis study demonstrated that NST resulted in an absolute increase of 25.8% in the rate of BCT eligibility in HER2-positive breast cancer. About a half of non-BCT candidates converted to BCT candidates. BCT was successful in most patients who attempted BCT. There were still patients who chose mastectomy even though they were deemed eligible for BCT. Patients considered BCT-ineligible due to large tumor size most likely converted to BCT-eligible with NST. On the other hand, NST had less impact on the surgical indication of patients with multicentric disease or probable poor cosmetic outcome.     

Gender Disparity in Breast Cancer: A Veteran Population-Based Comparison

BackgroundMale breast cancer (MBC) comprises <1% of all cancers and continues to rise. Because of rarity, there is paucity in the literature; therefore, management of MBC is generalized from female breast cancer (FBC).MethodsData from 152 VA Medical Centers were used to analyze the database of Veteran patient with breast cancer diagnosed between 1998 and 2016 using biostatistical software (SAS 9.3). Our primary objective is to compare patient's demographics, breast cancer characteristics, and outcomes for male and female Veterans.FindingIn total, 8864 patients' records were reviewed;1528 MBC were compared with 7336 FBC with a mean follow up time of 5.5 years (SD 4.17). The mean age at diagnosis was 68.6 years and 57.3 years for MBC and FBC, respectively (P < .0001). Higher numbers of MBC patients (95%) were >50 years of age compared to FBC patients (72%). More MBC patients (16.8 vs. 9.1% and 9 vs. 4%) presented with higher disease stage (III and IV, respectively). Estrogen receptor-positive tumors were more common in MBC (59 versus 52%). Hormonal treatment was received by 27% of MBC versus 19% FBC; chemotherapy 21.3% versus 41.5% and radiation 23.5% versus 60.9%. Forty-two percent MBC and 20% FBC Veterans died during study. Male patients had higher death rate 1.285 (95% CI: 1.150, 1.434, P < .0001) compared to females after adjusting data for age, race, stage, and grade.InterpretationTo the best of our knowledge, this is the largest comparison series of MBC and FBC to date in the Veterans population. The higher mortality rate in MBC patients may be due to late presentation, higher stage at the time of diagnosis and/or tumor biology. Veteran's exposures to hazardous materials during their military deployments as an additional factor for worse prognosis need further investigation.     

Worse prognosis of metaplastic breast cancer patients than other patients with triple-negative breast cancer

The present study was designed to assess the clinical characteristics and outcomes of metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) compared to general invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and the triple-negative subtype (TN-IDC). The study population included 35 MBC and 2,839 IDC patients, including 473 TN-IDC diagnoses, from the National Cancer Center, Korea between 2001 and 2008. The clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes were retrospectively reviewed. Mean age of patients was 47.4 years for the MBC group and 48.3 years for the IDC group. The MBC patients presented with a larger tumor size (≥T2, 74.3% vs. 38.8%, P < 0.001), more distant metastasis at the first diagnosis (8.6% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.04), higher histologic grade (grade 3, 65.7% vs. 41.4%, P < 0.001), fewer estrogen receptor (ER), and progesterone receptor (PgR) positivity (ER+, 5.7% vs. 65.4%, P < 0.001; PgR+, 8.6% vs. 55.8%, P < 0.001), higher Ki-67 expression (35.5 ± 26.2% vs. 20.6 ± 19.8%, P = 0.024), and more TN subtypes (80.0% vs. 16.7%, P < 0.001) compared to the IDC group. Fifteen (46.8%) MBC patients and 260 (9.3%) IDC patients experienced disease recurrence with a median follow-up of 47.2 months (range 4.9–100.6 months). MBC was a poor prognostic factor for disease recurrence and overall survival in univariate and multivariate analysis (HR 3.89 in recurrence, 95% CI: 1.36–11.14, P = 0.01; HR 5.29 in death, 95% CI: 2.15–13.01, P < 0.001). MBC patients also experienced more disease recurrence (HR 3.99, 95% CI: 1.31–12.19, P = 0.01) and poorer overall survival (HR 3.14, 95% CI: 1.19–8.29, P = 0.02) compared to the 473 TN-IDC patients, as reflected by aggressive pathological features. Patients with MBC appeared to have inherently aggressive tumor biology with poorer clinical outcomes than those with general IDC or TN-IDC.     

Adiposity,post-diagnosis weight change,and risk of cardiovascular events among early-stage breast cancer survivors

Purpose

We hypothesized different Overall Survival (OS) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after relapse vs de novo presentation.

Methods

We identified women in British Columbia with MBC diagnosed between 01/2001 and 12/2009. OS from MBC was calculated for relapsed vs de novo cohorts in 3 subgroups, based on hormone receptors (HR) and HER2 status. Age at MBC, disease-free interval (DFI), de novo vs relapsed, year of MBC diagnosis, and systemic treatment were entered into univariable and multivariable analyses.

Results

We identified 3645 pts with known HR of which 2796 had known HER2. Median follow-up was 91 months. Median OS was longer for de novo vs relapsed MBC: HR+/HER2- 34 versus 23 months (mos) (p < 0.0001), HR?/HER2- (TN) 11 versus 8 mos (p = 0.02), HER2+ 29 versus 15 mos (p < 0.0001). For TN disease, no variable independently discriminated a group with increased risk of death. For both the HR +/HER2- and the HER2 + groups, relapsed vs de novo status (HzR 1.4 [95% CI 1.2–1.5; p < 0.0001], and HzR 1.6 [95% CI 1.4–1.9; p < 0.0001], respectively) and age >50 (HzR 1.2 [95% CI 1.1–1.4; p = 0.001] and HzR 1.3 [95% CI 1.1–1.5; p = 0.01], respectively) were associated with increased risk of death on multivariable analysis.

Conclusion

These data provide information that may guide discussions about prognosis between physicians and patients with MBC. In addition, it highlights the importance of stratifying for initial stage at diagnosis in future MBC therapeutic trials.

     

Obesity and the outcome of young breast cancer patients in the UK: the POSH study

BackgroundObese breast cancer patients have a poorer prognosis than non-obese patients. We examined data from a large prospective cohort study to explore the associations of obesity with tumour pathology, treatment and outcome in young British breast cancer patients receiving modern oncological treatments.Patients and methodsA total of 2956 patients aged ≤40 at breast cancer diagnosis were recruited from 126 UK hospitals from 2001 to 2007. Height and weight were measured at registration. Tumour pathology and treatment details were collected. Follow-up data were collected at 6, 12 months, and annually.ResultsA total of 2843 eligible patients (96.2%) had a body mass index (BMI) recorded: 1526 (53.7%) were under/healthy-weight (U/H, BMI <25 kg/m²), 784 (27.6%) were overweight (ov, BMI ≥25 to <30), and 533 (18.7%) were obese (ob, BMI ≥30). The median tumour size was significantly higher in obese and overweight patients than U/H patients (Ob 26 mm versus U/H 20 mm, P < 0.001; Ov 24 mm versus U/H 20 mm, P < 0.001). Obese and overweight patients had significantly more grade 3 tumours (63.9% versus 59.0%, P = 0.048; Ov 63.6% versus U/H 59.0% P = 0.034) and node-positive tumours (Ob 54.6% versus U/H 49.0%, P = 0.027; Ov 54.2% versus U/H 49%, P = 0.019) than U/H patients. Obese patients had more ER/PR/HER2-negative tumours than healthy-weight patients (25.0% versus 18.3%, P = 0.001). Eight-year overall survival (OS) and distant disease-free interval (DDFI) were significantly lower in obese patients than healthy-weight patients [OS: hazard ratio (HR) 1.65, P < 0.001; DDFI: HR 1.44, P < 0.001]. Multivariable analyses adjusting for tumour grade, size, nodal, and HER2 status indicated that obesity was a significant independent predictor of OS and DDFI in patients with ER-positive disease.ConclusionsYoung obese breast cancer patients present with adverse tumour characteristics. Despite adjustment for this, obesity still independently predicts DDFI and OS.     

Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Male Patients With Stage IV Breast Cancer: A Population-based Study

Purpose

Male breast cancer (MBC) represents < 1% of breast cancer patients, and limited data exists regarding metastatic MBC. To better characterize this patient subset, we performed a population-based study examining prognostic factors among patients with stage IV MBC.