Predictive and Prognostic Role of Metabolic Response in Patients With Stage III NSCLC Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to assess the predictive and prognostic role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in candidates with stage III non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Patients and MethodsSixty-six patients with stage III NSCLC treated with induction chemotherapy from March 2013 to December 2017 were retrospectively identified. Response assessment were evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria. 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters were analyzed as absolute values as well as percentage changes (Δ) between 2 consecutive scans, for primary tumor (T) and for regional lymph nodes (N). All clinical variables and metabolic parameters were compared with treatment response and correlated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), based on a median follow-up of 9.4 months.ResultsPost-induction therapy standardized uptake value (SUV)max_T, SUVmean_T, metabolic tumor volume (MTV_T), and total lesion glycolysis of the tumor (TLG_T) varied significantly between responders and non-responders (6.6 vs. 13.8; P = .001; 4.2 vs. 8.1; P < .001; 6 vs. 17.9; P = .002; and 24.1 vs. 136.3; P < .001, respectively). Likewise, percentage changes (Δ_T) were significantly different between the 2 groups (P < .001). Along with primary tumor, also post-SUVmax_N, post-SUVmean_N, and post-TLG_N (P = .024, P = .015, and P = .024, respectively), as well as all percentage changes (Δ_N) were different between responders and non-responders. RECIST 1.1 and EORTC response classifications were discordant in 27 patients (40.9%; κ = 0.265; P = .003). On multivariate analysis, post-TLG_N was an independent predictor for both PFS and OS, whereas RECIST 1.1 was a predictor only for OS.ConclusionsSeveral metabolic parameters may differentiate responders from non-responders following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage III NSCLC. As compared with RECIST 1.1, EORTC seems to be more appropriate for evaluation therapeutic response. Finally, post-TLG_N has significant prognostic information.     

Interim Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography for Early Metabolic Assessment of Therapeutic Response to Chemotherapy for Metastatic Transitional Cell Carcinoma

BackgroundThe prognostic impact of early metabolic response by fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) after 2 cycles of first-line chemotherapy is still unrecognized in metastatic transitional cell carcinoma (TCC).Patients and MethodsPatients with metastatic TCC receiving the modified combination of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC), according to institutional protocol, underwent computed tomography (CT) and FDG-PET imaging at baseline, a restaging with PET imaging after 2 cycles only (PET2), and a CT (± FDG-PET) scan at the end of treatment and during follow-up. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated with the Kaplan–Meier method; univariate (UVA) and multivariate (MVA) Cox models were fitted. Prespecified variables were the presence of visceral metastases, nodal or soft tissue disease, and early PET response.ResultsIn the period from May 2010 to October 2012, 31 patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 received the modified MVAC regimen every 3 weeks. In all, 6 patients (19.3%) had a complete response (CR) and 17 (54.8%) a partial metabolic response (PR), 4 had stable disease (SD), and 4 progressed. PET2 responders had a median PFS of 8 months (95 % CI, 7-11 mo) compared with 3 months (95 % CI, 2-5 mo) of patients without response (P = .024). They also had a significant benefit in 8-month PFS (P < .001 via Klein test) and 15-month OS (P = .016). PET2 response was significant for PFS in both UVA and MVA Cox models (P = .027 and P = .023, respectively).ConclusionPET response after 2 cycles of first-line chemotherapy, compared with detection by early CT, was associated with longer PFS and OS in advanced TCC and warrants further investigation in the field.     

The Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Predicting the Response to PD-1 Blocking Immunotherapy in Advanced NSCLC Patients with High-Level PD-L1 Expression

BackgroundThe objective of this study was to evaluate if ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT)-derived parameters are useful in predicting response and survival after programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blocking immunotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC characterized by a high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (≥50%) on immunohistochemistry.Patients and MethodsIn 30 patients with advanced stage IV non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and high PD-L1 expression, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT parameters before start of treatment with PD-1 blocking immunotherapy were evaluated retrospectively. In 24 out of the 30 patients, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was available 8 to 9 weeks after start of the treatment. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) and metabolic responses assessed on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT were compared.ResultsMedian follow-up was 20 months (range, 4.2-37.6). Median PD-L1 expression was 80%. The objective response rate with RECIST 1.1 was 53.3%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-37.8), and median overall survival (OS) was 14.9 months (95% CI, 2.4-38.2). Baseline ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT parameters did not differ between responders and non-responders (all P > .05). The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was the only ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT parameter associated with PFS (P = .04), with a trend for OS (P = .06). At first evaluation, response according to total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were associated with PFS and OS (both P < .0001). This was not the case for RECIST 1.1 (P = .29 for PFS and P = .38 for OS).ConclusionClinical response and survival were independent from metabolic tumor volume at baseline. Reduction of metabolic tumor volume after 8 to 9 weeks of treatment was a better predictor for prolonged survival than RECIST 1.1.     

Disease Burden on PET Predicts Outcomes for Advanced NSCLC Patients Treated with First-Line Immunotherapy

BackgroundFirst-line immunotherapy (IMT), with or without cytotoxic chemotherapy, is now recommended for most patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with no targetable mutations. We reviewed outcomes for NSCLC patients treated with first-line IMT at our institution to test the hypothesis that measures of disease burden on staging FDG-PET/CT have prognostic value.Materials and MethodsPatient, disease, and treatment details were collected. A gradient-based segmentation tool was used to delineate each PET-avid extracranial lesion. Numbers of extrathoracic lesions and metabolic tumor volumes were tabulated. Oligometastatic disease (OMD) was defined as having ≤3 extrathoracic lesions, with any number of thoracic lesions. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates following initiation of IMT were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and predictors of PFS and OS were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models and logrank tests.ResultsOne hundred twenty-four patients met inclusion criteria, and 1143 lesions were contoured. The presence of OMD was associated with favorable PFS (median 13.1 vs. 6.9 months; P = .016) and favorable OS (median 36.5 vs. 15.4 months; P = .002). In multivariable models, OMD was associated with favorable PFS (HR = 0.64; P = .034) and favorable OS (HR = 0.61; P = .063), and metabolic tumor volumes exceeding the cohort median (88 cc) was associated with inferior OS (HR = 1.85; P = .028).ConclusionFor advanced NSCLC patients receiving first-line IMT, the presence of extrathoracic OMD and low volumetric disease burden on PET are favorable prognostic factors that could be useful stratification factors in clinical trials and may influence clinical decisions about local and systemic therapy.     

Long-term Survival with 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-directed Therapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with Synchronous Solitary Brain Metastasis

AimsAt diagnosis, <1% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have synchronous solitary brain metastasis (SSBM). In prior cohorts without 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) staging, definitive treatment to intracranial and intrathoracic disease showed a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 11–21%. We investigated the long-term survival outcomes for patients with SSBM NSCLC, diagnosed in the FDG-PET/CT era and treated definitively with local therapies to both intracranial and intrathoracic sites of disease.Materials and methodsThis retrospective study assessed patients staged with FDG-PET/CT who received definitive lung and SSBM treatment from February 1999 to December 2017. A lung-molecular graded prognostic assessment (lung-molGPA) score was assigned for each patient using age, performance status score, and, where carried out, molecular status. Overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using Kaplan–Meier methods. Cox proportional hazard models determined OS and PFS prognostic factors.ResultsForty-nine patients newly diagnosed with NSCLC and SSBM had a median age of 63 years (range 34–76). The median follow-up of all patients was 3.9 years. Thirty-three patients (67%) had ≥T2 disease, 23 (47%) had ≥N2. At 2 years, 45% of first failures were intracranial only (95% confidence interval 30–59). At 3 and 5 years, OS was 45% (95% confidence interval 32–63) and 30% (95% confidence interval 18–51), respectively. In ≥N1 disease, 5-year OS was 34% (95% confidence interval 18–63). The 3- and 5-year PFS was 8% (95% confidence interval 3–22) and 0%, respectively. Higher lung-molGPA was associated with longer OS (hazard ratio 0.26, 95% confidence interval 0.11–0.61, P = 0.002). Higher lung-molGPA (hazard ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.15–0.71, P = 0.005) and lower N-stage (hazard ratio 1.56, 95% confidence interval 1.13–2.15, P = 0.007) were associated with longer PFS.ConclusionsDefinitive treatment of patients with NSCLC and SSBM staged with FDG-PET/CT can result in 5-year survivors, including those with ≥N1 disease.     

PTEN Loss as a Predictor of Tumor Heterogeneity and Poor Prognosis in Patients With EGFR-mutant Advanced Non–small-cell Lung Cancer Receiving Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

BackgroundRapid disease progression of patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been recently associated with tumor heterogeneity, which may be mirrored by coexisting concomitant alterations. The aim of this analysis was to investigate the correlation between loss of function of PTEN and the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in this population.Materials and MethodsArchival tumor blocks from patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who were administered upfront tyrosine kinase inhibitors were retrospectively collected. The status of 4 genes (PTEN, TP53, c-MET, IGFR) was evaluated by immunohistochemistry, and it was correlated with overall response rate, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsFifty-one patients were included. In multivariate analysis, PTEN loss (hazard ratio [HR], 3.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.56-7.66; P = .002), IGFR overexpression (HR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.03-4.77; P = .04), liver metastases (HR, 3.55; 95% CI, 1.46-8.65; P = .005), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥ 1 (HR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.04-6.34; P = .04) were significantly associated with shorter PFS. Patients with PTEN loss had a median PFS of 6 months (2-year PFS, 11.6%), whereas patients without PTEN loss had a median PFS of 18 months (2-year PFS, 43.6%) (log-rank P < .005). In the multivariate analysis, PTEN loss (HR, 5.92; 95% CI, 2.37-14.81; P < .005), liver metastases (HR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.06-6.51; P = .037), and ECOG PS ≥ 1 (HR, 2.80; 95% CI, 1.15-6.81; P = .024) were significantly associated with shorter OS. Patients with PTEN loss had a median OS of 6 months (2-year OS, 12.2%), whereas in patients without PTEN loss, OS was not reached (2-year OS, 63.9%) (log-rank P < .0005).ConclusionsA low-cost and reproducible immunohistochemistry assay for PTEN loss analysis represents a potential tool for identifying tumor heterogeneity in patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC.     

Second Primary Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer After Head and Neck Cancer: A Population-Based Study of Clinical and Pathologic Characteristics and Survival Outcomes in 3597 Patients

IntroductionRetrospective studies have shown an increased risk of second primary lung cancer in patients with a history of head and neck cancer (HNC). No population-based study has examined the overall survival (OS) outcomes of patients with second primary non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after HNC comparison with patients with first primary NSCLC.Patients and MethodsIndividuals with histologically confirmed NSCLC diagnosed after nonmetastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNC-NSCLC; n = 3597) were identified in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 registries (1988-2013). OS and baseline characteristics were compared in patients with first primary NSCLC (NSCLC-1; n = 365,551) in the same registries.ResultsSquamous NSCLC was more common in HNC-NSCLC (n = 745 [64.1%] localized, n = 833 [71.9%] regional, and n = 811 [63.5%] distant) than in the NSCLC-1 (n = 30,901 [38.3%] localized, n = 50,557 [48.2%] regional, and n = 53,720 [29.8%] distant; P < .001). The leading cause of death in HNC-NSCLC was NSCLC (n = 2183; 60.6%), and median OS after localized, regional, and distant NSCLC diagnosis was 2.50 years, 1.17 years, and 5 months, respectively. For NSCLC-1, median OS was 4.58 years, 1.58 years, and 6 months, respectively. These differences were significant (P < .001). In multivariable analysis, a history of HNC remained associated with worse OS for localized (hazard ratio [HR], 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-1.51; P < .001), regional (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.19-1.35; P < .001) and distant (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.04-1.18; P < .01) stage NSCLC.ConclusionA history of HNC adversely affects OS in patients who subsequently develop NSCLC. This OS decrement might have implications for NSCLC surveillance and NSCLC therapy selection in this population.     

Incorporation of the SUVmax Measured From FDG PET and Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio Improves Prediction of Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Locally Advanced Non–small-cell Lung Cancer

IntroductionThe aim of the present study was to investigate the value of incorporation 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for improving prediction of clinical outcomes of patients with locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (LA NSCLC).Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively enrolled 138 patients with unresectable LA NSCLC at our institution from July 2010 to August 2017. Spearman correlation analyses were used to estimate the correlations between SUVmax and NLR level. The univariate and multivariate Cox survival analyses were used to evaluate the prognostic indicators, including the incorporation of SUVmax and NLR. We defined the SUVmax and NLR grade (SNG = 0, 1, or 2) score as the number of risk factors among (1) SUVmax > 11.95 and (2) NLR > 3.82. The SNG score prognostic value was evaluated for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsUnivariate analysis showed that tumor stage, SUVmax, SUVmean, NLR, and SNG score were significantly associated with OS and PFS in patients with LA NSCLC. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test demonstrated significant differences in both OS and PFS among patients in SNG score (OS, P < .001; PFS, P < .001). Spearman correlation analyses showed that SUVmax had a correlation with the NLR (r = 0.237; P = .005). In subgroup analyses for patients with tumor pathologic stage IIIA/IIIB, we found that the SNG score was significantly associated with OS and PFS in each subgroup (P < .001, P < .001 for OS and P = .027, P < .001 for PFS, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that the SNG score was a significantly independent prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio, 1.612; 95% confidence interval, 1.157-2.246; P = .005) and PFS (hazard ratio, 2.241; 95% confidence interval, 1.486-3.379; P < .001).ConclusionIncorporation of the SUVmax and NLR improves prediction of clinical outcomes in patients with LA NSCLC.     

Metabolic tumor volume is an independent prognostic factor in patients treated definitively for non-small-cell lung cancer

PurposeFluorine-18 flurodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging has rapidly become the standard of care for staging patients with lung cancer. We evaluated the prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume (MTV), a measure of tumor burden on FDG-PET imaging, in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated definitively.Methods and MaterialsA retrospective review identified 61 patients with NSCLC who underwent FDG-PET imaging for pretreatment staging. Metabolically active tumor regions were segmented on the PET scans semiautomatically to calculate the total body MTV. We determined the relationship of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with MTV in the entire cohort, and in the subgroup treated definitively.ResultsThe estimated median PFS and OS for the entire cohort were 11.1 months and 18.9 months. Higher MTV was significantly associated with worse OS (P = 0.00075) and PFS (P = 0.00077). For definitively treated patients, when MTV was analyzed as a binary value above or below the median value, 2-year PFS was 60% versus 39.7% (median PFS 34.9 vs. 11.9 months) and 2-year OS was 79.7% versus 33.3% (median OS 41.9 vs. 18.9 months), respectively (log-rank P = 0.12 for PFS and P = 0.066 for OS). When MTV was analyzed as a continuous variable, multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated a trend to worse PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.31; P = 0.12) and significantly worse OS (HR = 1.53; P = 0.018) with increasing MTV after controlling for known prognostic variables.ConclusionTumor burden as assessed by MTV yields prognostic information on survival beyond that of established prognostic factors in patients with NSCLC treated definitively.     

Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes Predict Survival in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients With Monomorphic Post-transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorders

IntroductionThe tumor microenvironment (TME) in post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) remains unexplored. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are prognostic in other lymphomas. We assessed the prognostic impact of TILs in monomorphic B-cell PTLD.MethodsTIL density (CD3+ cells/mm²) was determined by CD3 immunohistochemistry in archived diagnostic biopsies from patients diagnosed with monomorphic B-cell PTLD.ResultsAmongst monomorphic PTLDs (N = 107), low TIL-count was associated with inferior 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) (41% versus 86%, P = .003) and 2-year overall survival (OS) (52% versus 93%, P = .003) by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Low TIL-count was significant on Cox univariate regression for inferior PFS (HR 4.5, 95% CI 2.0-9.9, P < .001) and OS (HR 4.6, 95% CI 1.8-11.8, P < .001). Multivariate analysis with clinical variables (age ≥60 years, high LDH, stage III/IV, CNS involvement) and TIL-count showed significance for PFS (HR 3.3, 95% CI 1.3-8.3, P = .010) and a non-significant trend for OS (HR 2.6, 95% CI 0.9-7.3, P = .064). A composite score including TILs and clinical variables (age ≥60 years, high LDH, stage III/IV, CNS involvement) effectively stratified monomorphic PTLD patients by PFS and OS (2-year OS: low-risk 93%, intermediate-risk 61%, high-risk 23%, P < .001).ConclusionsThe TME and TILs are prognostically relevant in monomorphic PTLD. Prognostic models including measures of the TME may improve risk stratification for patients with monomorphic PTLDs.     

First-line Pembrolizumab Versus Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Non–small-cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

BackgroundThis study aimed to comprehensively review the available evidence regarding the efficacy of first-line pembrolizumab for advanced/metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and to compare pembrolizumab monotherapy versus pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone.Materials and MethodsA search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases was performed in July 2018, and abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology meetings (2015-2018) were reviewed. Summaries of the results were pooled using a random-effect model to determine the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A network meta-analysis was used to indirectly compare pembrolizumab monotherapy with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy.ResultsA total of 4 relevant phase III trials comprising 2754 patients were identified. Pembrolizumab (with or without chemotherapy) led to significant improvements in OS and PFS, irrespective of the programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS). In particular, for the subgroup with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%, the HR of PFS was 0.49 (95% CI, 0.32-0.76; P = .001), and that of OS was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.45-0.73; P < .001). In terms of PFS, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was superior to pembrolizumab monotherapy with an HR of PFS 0.52 (95% CI, 0.27-0.99; P = .048) for the subgroup with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%.ConclusionsFor patients with NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy has a better PFS than pembrolizumab monotherapy in this meta-analysis. To confirm this finding, a prospective phase III trial that directly compares the treatments is warranted.     

Postoperative Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced NSCLC: Implications for Shifting to Conformal,High-Risk Fields

BackgroundTo examine the effect of radiotherapy field size on survival outcomes and patterns of recurrence in patients treated with postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the records of 216 patients with T1-4 N1-2 NSCLC following surgery and PORT using whole mediastinum (WM) or high-risk (HR) nodal fields from 1998 to 2015. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted using Cox proportional hazards modeling for outcomes and logistic regression analysis for treatment toxicities.ResultsMedian follow-up was 28 months (interquartile range [IQR] 13-75 months) and 38 months (IQR 19-73 months) for WM (n = 131) and HR (n = 84) groups, respectively. Overall survival (OS) was not significantly different between groups (median OS: HR 49 vs. WM 32 months; P = .08). There was no difference in progression-free survival (PFS), freedom from locoregional recurrence (LRR), or freedom from distant metastasis (P > .2 for all). Field size was not associated with OS, PFS, or LRR (P > .40 for all). LRR rates were 20% for HR and 26% for WM groups (P = .30). There was no significant difference in patterns of initial site of LRR between groups (P > .1). WM fields (OR 3.73, P = .001) and concurrent chemotherapy (odds ratio 3.62, P = .001) were associated with grade ≥2 toxicity.ConclusionsLocoregional control and survival rates were similar between PORT groups; an improved toxicity profile was observed in the HR group. Results from an ongoing prospective randomized clinical trial will provide further insight into the consequences of HR PORT fields.     

Prognostic value of 18F‐fluoroazomycin arabinoside PET/CT in patients with advanced non‐small‐cell lung cancer

This study evaluated the prognostic value of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) using ¹⁸F‐fluoroazomycin arabinoside (FAZA) in patients with advanced non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared with ¹⁸F‐fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). Thirty‐eight patients with advanced NSCLC (stage III, 23 patients; stage IV, 15 patients) underwent FAZA and FDG PET/CT before treatment. The PET parameters (tumor‐to‐muscle ratio [T/M] at 1 and 2 h for FAZA, maximum standardized uptake value for FDG) in the primary lesion and lymph node (LN) metastasis and clinical parameters were compared concerning their effects on progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In our univariate analysis of all patients, clinical stage and FAZA T/M in LNs at 1 and 2 h were predictive of PFS (P = 0.021, 0.028, and 0.002, respectively). Multivariate analysis also indicated that clinical stage and FAZA T/M in LNs at 1 and 2 h were independent predictors of PFS. Subgroup analysis of chemoradiotherapy‐treated stage III patients revealed that only FAZA T/M in LNs at 2 h was predictive of PFS (P = 0.025). The FDG PET/CT parameters were not predictive of PFS. No parameter was a significant predictor of OS. In patients with advanced NSCLC, FAZA uptake in LNs, but not in primary lesions, was predictive of treatment outcome. These results suggest the importance of characterization of LN metastases in advanced NSCLC patients.     

Early Response to Chemotherapy in Patients With Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Assessed by [18F]-Fluoro-Deoxy-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography

BackgroundThis study aimed to demonstrate that patients who exhibit a tumor metabolic response to first-line chemotherapy seen on FDG-PET and computed tomography (CT) would survive longer than those who did not show such a response, comparing this evaluation with the morphologic response seen on CT.Patients and MethodsImages were acquired in 22 consecutive patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) randomized to receive carboplatin/paclitaxel/sorafenib or placebo. FDG-PET was performed within 4 weeks before (PET1) and 2 weeks after starting treatment (PET2). Similarly, CT (CT1) was performed at baseline and then every 2 cycles (6 weeks) during treatment (CT2). Responders and nonresponders were identified with FDG-PET, and metabolic response was then compared with morphologic changes detected by spiral CT.ResultsTwenty-one of 22 patients completed this study. In terms of progression-free survival (PFS) (45 vs. 22.2 weeks) and overall survival (OS) (77 vs. 47.7 weeks), we observed a trend that was not statistically significant for patients whose response after 2 weeks of treatment was seen on FDG-PET (P = .22 for PFS; P = .15 for OS).ConclusionPatients with advanced NSCLC who had a positive outcome, as evidenced by prolonged survival, were those who showed a tumor metabolic response seen on FDG-PET.     

Minimal Residual Disease and Survival Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BackgroundPatients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who achieve undetectable minimal residual disease (U-MRD) (ie, < 10^-4 detectable leukemic cells in peripheral blood or bone marrow) have better outcomes than those with detectable MRD. To assess the magnitude of improvement of progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) in patients who achieved U-MRD after upfront chemotherapy (CT) or chemo-immunotherapy (CIT), we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis.Materials and MethodsThe screening process adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Guidelines. The search strategy yielded 365 records, including 22 articles assessed for eligibility.ResultsEleven studies comprising 2457 patients with CLL treated in upfront with CT or CIT were considered suitable for inclusion in the quantitative meta-analysis. Nine studies (n = 2088) provided data on the impact of MRD on PFS and 6 (n = 1234) on OS. MRD was the main endpoint in only 2 of these studies (n = 213). Tests of heterogeneity revealed significant differences among studies for PFS and OS, which highlights differences across studies. U-MRD status was associated with significantly better PFS overall (P < .001) and in patients who achieved conventional complete remission (P = .01). Regarding OS, U-MRD predicted longer OS globally (P < .001) but not in patients having achieved complete remission (P = .82).ConclusionsU-MRD status after treatment with CT or CIT in newly diagnosed CLL is associated with long-term survival. These findings provide quantitative evidence to support the integration of MRD assessment as an end point in clinical trials of CLL.     

A Randomized Phase II Study of Perioperative Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab Versus Postoperative Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab in Patients With Upfront Resectable Hepatic Colorectal Metastases

IntroductionWhether patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) gain a survival benefit from perioperative chemotherapy remains controversial. The benefit of including bevacizumab in chemotherapy also remains unclear.Material and MethodsSeventy-six patients with CRLM were randomly assigned to either 6 cycles of FOLFOX (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin)/FOLFIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and irinotecan) with bevacizumab before and after surgery or 12 cycles after surgery. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test.ResultsThe median PFS of all patients was 37.4 months at 5.4 years follow-up, and the median overall survival (OS) was not reached. The PFS between the perioperative group and the postoperative group did not reveal a statistical difference (P = .280). The OS was significantly better in the perioperative group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI],) 0.35-1.02; P = .049). In subgroup patients with carcinoembryonic antigens (CEA) ≥ 5 ng/mL or those with over 2 liver metastases, perioperative group had longer OS than postoperative group (CEA: HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.25-0.93; P = .030; number of liver metastases: HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.30-0.99; P = .049). The largest liver metastases size, disease-free interval, and sidedness did not affect PFS or OS. There was no difference between the 2 groups in postoperative complications with bevacizumab or adverse events during chemotherapy.ConclusionsIn patients with resectable CRLMs, perioperative chemotherapy had no effect on PFS, but improved OS. Patients with high CEA levels or over 2 liver metastases may benefit from perioperative chemotherapy.     

Antibiotic Treatment is an Independent Poor Risk Factor in NSCLC But Not in Melanoma Patients Who had Received Anti-PD-1/L1 Monotherapy

BackgroundAntibiotic treatment may reduce the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy by disrupting gut microbiome. We aimed to study the association of antibiotics and survival outcomes in advanced cutaneous melanoma and non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who had received anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy.Patients and MethodsA total of 222 melanoma and 199 NSCLC patients had received anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy in 5 Finnish hospitals between January 2014 and December 2020. Clinical characteristics, antibiotic and corticosteroid treatment, and survival outcomes were retrospectively collected from hospital and national medical records.ResultsThere were 32% of melanoma and 31% of NSCLC patients who had received antibiotic treatment (ABT) 3 months before to 1 month after the first anti-PD-1/L1 antibody infusion. In survival analyses, early antibiotic treatment was associated with inferior overall survival (OS) (ABT 19.2 [17.6-43.7] vs. no ABT 35.6 [29.3-NA] months, P = .033) but not with inferior progression-free survival (PFS) (ABT 5.8 [3.0-12.6] vs. no ABT 10.2 [7.7-15.3] months, P = .3) in melanoma patients and with inferior OS (ABT 8.6 [6.4-12.3] vs. no ABT 18.5 [15.1-21.6] months, P < .001) and PFS (ABT 2.8 [2.1-4.5] vs. no ABT 5.6 [4.4-8.0] months, P = .0081) in NSCLC patients. In multivariable analyses, ABT was not an independent risk-factor for inferior OS and PFS in melanoma but was associated with inferior OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.12 [1.37-3.28]) and PFS (HR 1.65 [1.10-2.47]) in NSCLC after adjusted for other risk factors.ConclusionsEarly ABT was an independent poor risk factor in NSCLC patients who had received anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy but not in melanoma patients. The weight of ABT as a poor risk factor might depend on other prognostic factors in different cancers.     

Efficacy and Safety of Brigatinib Compared With Crizotinib in Asian vs. Non-Asian Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic ALK–Inhibitor-Naive ALK+ Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Final Results From the Phase III ALTA-1L Study

BackgroundBrigatinib is a next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy in locally advanced and metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in crizotinib-refractory and ALK inhibitor-naive settings. This analysis assessed brigatinib in Asian vs. non-Asian patients from the first-line ALTA-1L trial.Patients and MethodsThis was a subgroup analysis from the phase III ALTA-1L trial of brigatinib vs. crizotinib in ALK inhibitor–naive ALK+ NSCLC. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by blinded independent review committee (BIRC). Secondary endpoints included confirmed objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS) in the overall population and BIRC-assessed intracranial ORR and PFS in patients with brain metastases.ResultsOf the 275 randomized patients, 108 were Asian. Brigatinib showed consistent superiority in BIRC-assessed PFS vs. crizotinib in Asian (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.35 [95% CI: 0.20-0.59]; log-rank P = .0001; median 24.0 vs. 11.1 months) and non-Asian (HR: 0.56 [95% CI: 0.38-0.84]; log-rank P = .0041; median 24.7 vs. 9.4 months) patients. Results were consistent with investigator-assessed PFS and BIRC-assessed intracranial PFS. Brigatinib was well tolerated. Toxicity profiles and dose modification rates were similar between Asian and non-Asian patients.ConclusionEfficacy with brigatinib was consistently better than with crizotinib in Asian and non-Asian patients with locally advanced or metastatic ALK inhibitor-naive ALK-+ NSCLC. There were no clinically notable differences in overall safety in Asian vs. non-Asian patients.     

Metabolic Activity on [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Glucose Transporter-1 Expression Might Predict Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Limited Disease Small-Cell Lung Cancer Who Receive Concurrent Chemoradiation

BackgroundLimited disease small-cell lung cancer responds well to concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT), but shows high relapse rate and short RFS. We aimed to evaluate tumor metabolic activities measured using FDG-PET as a prognostic factor and analyze its relationships with markers of tumor biologic behavior.Patients and MethodsForty-one LD-SCLC patients receiving 4 cycles of EP (etoposide 120 mg/m², days 1-3; cisplatin 60 mg/m², day 1), 2 cycles of EP (etoposide 130 mg/m², days 1-3; cisplatin 30 mg/m², day 1)-CCRT were enrolled. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUV; SUVmax) of primary tumor was revised with SUV of liver (SUVlivermax). Differences between pre-, posttreatment average SUV uptake of primary tumor, and intrathoracic lymph nodes were presented as ΔSUVliveravg. Thirty-one tumor biopsy specimens were immunostained for GLUT-1, Bcl-2, and HIF-1α.ResultsThe median overall survival (OS), and RFS were 13.7 and 10.4 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, pretreatment lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and ΔSUVliveravg correlated with RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.8, P = .043; HR, 0.3, P = .004). Sex, LDH, objective tumor metabolic response, and SUVlivermax correlated with OS (HR, 12.1, P = .006; HR, 3.7, P = .037; HR, 10.1, P = .008; and HR, 0.2, P = .014, respectively). High GLUT-1 positivity (> 75%), and LDH level (> 400 U/L) correlated with better objective response rate (P = .012) and HIF-1α immunoreactivity score (P = .029).ConclusionΔSUVliveravg and GLUT-1 expression might predict RFS and ORR in patients with LD-SCLC treated with definitive CCRT.     

Impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT staging on management and prognostic stratification in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A prospective observational study

BackgroundAccurate assessment of the extent of cancer is essential for appropriate treatment planning and outcome prediction. This study prospectively evaluated whether adding ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) to the routine initial staging practice in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) improved management and prognosis.MethodsAll consecutive patients with newly diagnosed HNSCC who presented in October 2010 – December 2012 underwent conventional workups (CWU) followed by PET/CT. The clinical stage and management plans before and after PET/CT were compared. PET/CT was deemed to have no/low, moderate, and high impact on management planning depending on whether PET/CT changed the treatment modality or goal. The appropriateness of PET/CT staging and management impact was confirmed by histopathology and clinical follow-up, and its association with survival was analysed.FindingsOf the 248 patients, PET/CT changed the Tumour Node Metastasis (TNM) classification in 79 (31.9%). In the patients with discordant staging, PET/CT staging was significantly more sensitive and accurate than CWU staging (both P < 0.001). PET/CT had high or moderate impact on management in 39 (15.7%) patients. Patients with PET/CT upstaged disease had significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than patients with no CWU-stage changes (3-year PFS = 56.8% versus 74.5%, P = 0.043; 3-year OS = 61.3% versus 85.3%, P = 0.006). Multivariate analyses revealed that PET/CT staging and second primary cancer were independent predictive factors for both PFS and OS (P < 0.05, each).Interpretations¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT added important staging information that improved management and prognostic stratification in HNSCC.