Avoidance of dental visits: the predictive validity of three dental anxiety scales

The purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for Corah's Dental Anxiety Scale (DAS) and two modified versions of it (MDAS; MDAS/4). A questionnaire was mailed to a simple random sample of 1,190 25-year-old residents in the west of Norway in 1997. Half the sample received DAS, the other half MDAS. The response rate after one reminder was 62%. The respondents completed the scales, gave demographic particulars and answered one question about dental visiting habits during the last 5 years plus an open-ended question about reasons for non-attendance. Using the answers to the latter question as validating criterion, it was found that, for all scales, sensitivity decreased while specificity improved when changing from a liberal to a stringent cut-off point. The scales gave low positive predictive values (< or = 0.26), but high negative predictive values (> or = 0.98). Since DAS and MDAS/4 gave almost identical findings, the two samples were combined. At a cut-off point > or = 13 sensitivity was 0.83, specificity 0.84, positive predictive value 0.18 and negative predictive value 0.99. The corresponding estimates when the cut-off point was > or = 15 were 0.67, 0.90, 0.22 and 0.98. It is concluded that, in this test, DAS and the two versions of MDAS gave acceptable, or near acceptable sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive values, but far too low positive predictive values to be useful for prediction at the individual level.     

Reliability and validity of the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) in a Turkish population

OBJECTIVES: Fear of dentistry is a common obstacle to obtaining dental care in Turkey. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability, validity and psychometric characteristics of the Turkish translation of the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) and compare it to the Dental Fear Survey (DFS) scores obtained in the same population. METHODS: The Turkish translated version of the MDAS was administered to 115 dental patients; 21 subjects who suffered from dental phobia, requiring general anesthesia for dental procedures, and 94 who did not have dental anxiety, in addition to 442 subjects from the general population. RESULTS: The Turkish translated version of the MDAS was internally consistent and reproducible. The patients with dentist phobia had the highest score. The Turkish MDAS correlated with the DFS (r = 0.80, P < 0.001). The MDAS scale correlated inversely (r = -0.14, P < 0.005) with level of education; however, it did not correlate with economic status. Women scored higher than men on the scale (mean = 12.3, SD = 5.2 vs. mean = 10.9, SD = 4.5, P < 0.005). At a cut-off point > or = 15, sensitivity was 0.80, specificity 0.74, positive predictive value 0.41 and negative predictive value 0.94. CONCLUSION: Although the specificity values were low, the Turkish MDAS demonstrated acceptable sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values. Thus, high reliability and validity of the MDAS supports its cross-cultural validity and indicated that it may be a valuable tool in quantifying fear of dentistry among Turks.     

Evaluating a single dental anxiety question in Finnish adults

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the psychometric properties (criterion validity, construct validity, sensitivity, and specificity) of a single-item question screening for dental anxiety in a Finnish adult population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 823 subjects, ranging in age from 18 to 87 years, answered a questionnaire comprising sections assessing the respondents' demographic profile and dental attendance patterns. A single dental anxiety question and the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) were included. The final response rate was 85%. RESULTS: Eight percent of the sample was highly dentally anxious using the MDAS cut-off point of 19 or above. Twelve percent of the respondents rated themselves as "very scared" on the single-item question. The percentage agreement between the single-item question and the MDAS was 93; the Kappa coefficient was 0.63. Specificity of the single question was 0.95 while sensitivity was 0.80 using the MDAS dichotomous classification. The single-item question related to age (p<0.001), gender (p<0.001), and dental attendance (p<0.001), as predicted. CONCLUSIONS: The single question has good validity, specificity, and sensitivity and may be used with confidence to assess dental fear in such situations as national health surveys or in routine dental practice where a multi-item dental anxiety questionnaire is not feasible.     

Evaluating a single dental anxiety question in Finnish adults

Objective. To evaluate the psychometric properties (criterion validity, construct validity, sensitivity, and specificity) of a single-item question screening for dental anxiety in a Finnish adult population. Material and methods. A total of 823 subjects, ranging in age from 18 to 87 years, answered a questionnaire comprising sections assessing the respondents’ demographic profile and dental attendance patterns. A single dental anxiety question and the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) were included. The final response rate was 85%. Results. Eight percent of the sample was highly dentally anxious using the MDAS cut-off point of 19 or above. Twelve percent of the respondents rated themselves as “very scared” on the single-item question. The percentage agreement between the single-item question and the MDAS was 93; the Kappa coefficient was 0.63. Specificity of the single question was 0.95 while sensitivity was 0.80 using the MDAS dichotomous classification. The single-item question related to age (p<0.001), gender (p<0.001), and dental attendance (p<0.001), as predicted. Conclusions. The single question has good validity, specificity, and sensitivity and may be used with confidence to assess dental fear in such situations as national health surveys or in routine dental practice where a multi-item dental anxiety questionnaire is not feasible.     

Dental anxiety among adults in Turkey

AIM: This aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of dental anxiety and related factors in a Turkish population. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The Turkish translation of the Dental Fear Scale (DFS) and the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) were administered to 115 dental patients consisting of 21 subjects who had dental phobia and of 94 patients who did not. The scales were also administered to a non-clinical general population (N=183). RESULTS: The Turkish version of the DFS was internally consistent and reproducible. The scale had strong correlations (r=0.80, p<0.001 ) with the MDAS. Female participants scored higher (45.2+/-18.1) on the scale than men (38.2+/-15.7). The DFS had a negative correlation (r=-0.25, p<0.001) with education level. There was a statistically significant difference between dental phobics and the remaining groups on the DFS total score. At a cut-off point 55, the sensitivity of the scale was 0.80, specificity 0.80, positive predictive value 0.48, and negative predictive value 0.95. Thirty-nine subjects (21.3%) in the general population had total scores above this cut-off point. CONCLUSION: Dental fear is common in clinical and non-clinical settings in Turkey. The good psychometric characteristics of the DFS among Turkish participants supports its cross-cultural validity.     

Evaluation of in-office dental unit waterline testing

In-office dental unit waterline (DUWL) testing systems are commercially available for monitoring DUWL bacteria. The current study compared Aquasafe, Petrifilm, and Heterotrophic Plate Count Sampler (HPCS) with R2A plating methodology, considered the gold standard for enumerating heterotrophic bacteria in potable water. Samples were collected from 20 dental units. Heterotrophic bacterial counts of ≤500 CFUs/mL were used as the cut-off for assessing in-office testing compared to R2A laboratory plating. Validity was assessed using sensitivity and specificity, along with positive and negative predictive values. Results were also compared using concordance and kappa statistics. All in-office tests demonstrated 100% specificity and positive predictive values, while sensitivity and negative predictive values were low (Petrifilm, 57%/50%; HPCS, 50%/46%; Aquasafe, 21%/35%). Concordance and kappa values for agreement with R2A plating were as follows: Petrifilm 70% (κ = 0.44), HPCS 65% (κ = 0.38), and Aquasafe 45% (κ = 0.14). In-office DUWL testing with Aquasafe, Petrifilm, and HPCS agreed poorly with R2A plating methodology and is not valid or reliable as a means of accurately monitoring bacterial density in DUWL. These in-office test systems should not be used for assessing compliance with the ADA and CDC standard for acceptable heterotrophic bacterial counts in DUWLs (≤500 CFUs/mL).     

Employing dmft score as a risk predictor for caries development in the permanent teeth in Japanese primary school girls

The aim of this study was to examine the significance of evaluating dmft for predicting the incidence of permanent teeth caries in Japanese girls. The subjects were two birth cohorts in a Primary girls' school: cohort I composed of 45 girls born in 1981 and 1982 and cohort II composed of 53 girls born in 1989 and 1990. In both cohorts, there was a significant correlation between the dmft score in the first grade and the DMFT score in the sixth grade. The validity of employing dmft score was examined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and risk ratios. The shape of the curve and areas under the curve were similar in the two cohorts. In cohort II, sensitivity and specificity for the optimal cut-off level (dmft >or= 5) were 0.519 and 0.923, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values for that level were 0.875 and 0.649, respectively. In cohort I, sensitivity and specificity were 0.741 and 0.722 for that level and positive and negative predictive values were 0.800 and 0.650, respectively. In both cohorts, the risk ratio for permanent teeth caries was significant for many cut-off levels of dmft. The results indicated that the dmft score is a useful predictor of the permanent teeth caries in Japanese primary school girls.     

牙科焦虑症对孕妇口腔健康状况的影响

目的：探讨牙科焦虑症对孕妇口腔健康状况的影响。方法：采用改良的牙科焦虑量表（MDAS）对安徽医科大学第一附属医院产科住院生产的542名孕妇进行调查,分析牙科焦虑症对其口腔健康状况的影响。结果：542名孕妇中,牙科焦虑程度较高者（MDAS≥15分）168例,牙科焦虑程度较低者（MDAS＜15分）374例,两组间患龋率差异无统计学意义（P＞0．05）;但牙科焦虑程度较高组的龋失补牙数（DMFT）和社区牙周指数（CPI）均高于牙科焦虑程度较低组,组间差异均有统计学意义（P＜0．01）。结论：牙科焦虑症可能对孕妇的口腔健康产生有害影响。     

Oral lesions as predictors of highly active antiretroviral therapy failure in Brazilian HIV-infected children

Objectives:  Evaluate the accuracy of HIV-related oral lesions to predict immune and virologic failure on HIV-infected children in use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART).
Study design:  Data for this cross-sectional analysis come from a longitudinal study being conducted through the HIV-AIDS Outpatient Unit, ENT Division, Hospital das Clinicas, Sao Paulo University Medical School. The study began in January 1990 and is still ongoing. The cut-off point for analyses purposes was December 2004. Subjects were 471 HIV-infected consecutive children attending the outpatient unit during this period, who enrolled regardless of medical or immunological status. The children have undertaken oral cavity examination, serum CD4⁺ T-lymphocyte count, and, 271 of them, viral load measurement. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and relative risk were calculated.
Results:  Oral lesions had moderate sensitivity, high specificity and positive predictive value to predict immune failure. It had low sensitivity and positive predictive value, and high specificity to predict virologic failure.
Discussion and conclusions:  Oral manifestations of HIV can be important markers for immune suppression and for virologic failure, in Brazilian children undergoing HAART.     

Dental anxiety, optimism–pessimism, and dental experience from childhood to adolescence

Abstract 94 adolescents, 58% of the original study group, participated in a 5-yr follow-up questionnaire study to assess the predictive power of self-reported dental anxiety, optimism–pessimism dimension, and previous dental experience on dental anxiety level over the 5-yr period. The mean values on Corah's Dental Anxiety Scale (DAS) and Dental Anxiety Question (DAQ) had increased for the girls and remained stable for the boys. The predictive power of DAS and DAQ on anxiety levels as measured by these same scales 5 yr later was weak to moderate, although statistically significant. The optimism–pessimism dimension and dental treatment experiences did not have any effect on dental anxiety changes from childhood to adolescence. DAS had an independent, weak, but statistically significant negative effect on optimistic disposition over the period. The internal reliability of DAS was high and highly similar results using DAS and DAQ were found. Except for significantly more dental experience in the drop-out group (n= 69) than in the current study group in the first study, there were no satistically significant differences in mean scores between the groups with respect to self-reported and clinical dental anxiety, and optimism. Methodological complications are discussed.     

Self - perceived and clinically diagnosed dental and periodontal health status among young adults and their implications for epidemiological surveys

BACKGROUND: Clinical (normative) and subjective (self-assessment) evaluation of caries and periodontal diseases have been reported to demonstrate a significant disparity. The dental public health team is obligated to recognize and understand this gap. The objectives of the study were to investigate the practical values of using questionnaires (self-perceived assessment) as compared to clinical examinations (normative assessment) and to evaluate the implications of the results in understanding the public's perception of oral health. METHODS: The investigation was performed on 4920, 21 year-old Israeli adults upon release from compulsory military service between 1996 and 1998. Participants were asked to fill in a questionnaire inquiring how they would rate their personal dental and periodontal health levels. Clinical examinations, employing the DMFT and CPITN indices, were performed to determine normative oral health status. Perceived and normative assessments were compared for sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and overall proportions using the clinical examinations as a gold standard. RESULTS: The sensitivity (disease perception) for dental status was found to be 0.34, while the specificity (health perception) was found to be 0.83. The positive predictive value for perceived dental status was found to be 0.68, whereas the negative predictive value was found to be 0.54. The sensitivity for perceived periodontal status was found to be 0.28, while the specificity was found to be 0.83. The positive predictive value for perceived periodontal status was found to be 0.05, whereas the negative predictive value was found to be 0.97. Regarding the overall proportions, a large discrepancy was found between self-assessment and professional assessment for both dental and periodontal health status. CONCLUSIONS: Self-assessment questionnaires were of low value in evaluating oral health status both in the individual and public levels, though perception levels of health were higher than that of disease. Findings reflects a low level of awareness of the public that may influence care-seeking behavior and highlight the importance of oral health promotion and the crucial need for public health action.     

What is the most fearful intervention in ambulatory oral surgery? Analysis of an outpatient clinic

The aim of this study was to evaluate the levels of fear and anxiety in patients undergoing different types of minor oral surgery procedures by using conventional rating scales adjusted to the population characteristics. A demographic form and translated versions of the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) and Dental Fear Survey (DFS) were completed by 500 patients having hard or soft tissue pathologies, third molar removal, implant placement, tooth extraction procedures and 200 non-clinical participants. MDAS and DFS were highly correlated (r=0.79; P<0.05). The structural properties of the MDAS were similar to the original, but the DFS required substantive changes to achieve comparable measurement properties. Anxiety levels decreased with age and were greater in females, those with higher education and following a previous unpleasant experience (P<0.05 for all). The third molar group scored higher than most of the surgical categories in both questionnaires (P<0.05 for each). DFS showed they tended to avoid surgical procedures and were more susceptible to environmental and chair-side effects (P<0.05 for all). Regarding oral surgery, third molar patients should be targeted to increase overall comfort of the treatment. Assessments should be adjusted to cultural differences.     

Fine needle aspiration cytology and frozen section in the diagnosis of malignant parotid tumours

The aim of this study was to determine the value of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and frozen section (FS) in the diagnosis of malignant parotid tumours. One hundred and thirty-eight patients who underwent FNAC and FS of a parotid tumour between 2006 and 2011 were analyzed retrospectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of FNAC and FS were determined using final histological diagnosis as the gold standard. Of the 138 tumours assessed in our study, 30 were malignant and 108 benign. For FNAC, the sensitivity was 73%, specificity 87%, positive predictive value 61%, and negative predictive value 90%. For FS, the sensitivity was 80%, specificity 98%, positive predictive value 92%, and negative predictive value 94%. Four false-negative results by FNAC were corrected by FS, and surgery was completed. Two false-positive results were identified by both FNAC and FS. FNAC is an important examination that provides valuable information for the preoperative diagnostic work-up and alerts the surgeon to the possible presence of malignancy. However, FNAC cannot be used alone, and FS has a very important place in the intraoperative management of parotid tumours.     

乳牙列龋病对早期第一恒磨牙龋病的预测研究

为了探讨乳牙列龋病对第一恒磨牙龋病的预测价值，本研究依据１６０名儿童５岁时乳牙列ｄｍｆｔ指数与其８、９或１０岁时第一恒磨牙ＤＭＦＴ指数的纵向资料，对乳牙龋病与第一恒磨牙龋病进行相关分析并计算以乳牙列龋病状况来预测第一恒磨牙龋病的特异性，敏感性，正确预测率，阳性及阴性预测值。结果显示：５岁时乳牙列ｄｍｆｔ与早期第一恒磨牙ＤＭＦＴ显著相关，敏感性与特异性之和最大值为１２８％，出现在ｄｍｆｔ为８时，此时     

Psychometric properties of Greek versions of the Modified Corah Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) and the Dental Fear Survey (DFS)

Background

A growing body of literature describes the performance of dental fear questionnaires in various countries. We describe the psychometric properties of Greek versions of the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) and the Dental Fear Survey (DFS) in adult Greek patients.

Methods

Greek versions of the MDAS and DFS were administered to two samples of adult dental patients. In the first sample, 195 patients attending one of three private practice dental offices in a large city in Greece completed the questionnaires in the waiting room before dental treatment. After treatment, their dentists (who did not know how the patients had answered the questionnaire) rated their anxiety during dental treatment. In the second sample, 41 patients attending a Greek university dental school clinic completed the questionnaire twice at two separate visits, in order to provide test-retest data. Cronbach's alpha was used to compute the internal consistencies, while Spearman's rho was used to compute the test-retest reliabilities. Construct validity was assessed by correlating the responses to the MDAS and DFS by Spearman's rho. Spearman's rho was also used to examine the criterion validities, by comparing the questionnaire responses with the dentists' ratings of anxiety.

Results

The internal consistencies for the MDAS were 0.90 and 0.92 in the two samples; for the DFS, the internal consistencies were 0.96 in both samples. The test-retest reliabilities were 0.94 for the MDAS and 0.95 for the DFS. The correlation between the two questionnaires was 0.89. The patients' responses to both questionnaires were significantly related to the dentists' ratings of their anxiety during dental treatment (both p values <0.001).

Conclusion

The results indicate that the Greek versions of the MDAS and DFS have good internal consistencies and test-retest reliabilities, as well as good construct and criterion validities. The psychometric properties of the Greek versions of these questionnaires appear to be similar to those previously reported in other countries.     

Effect of different diagnostic thresholds on dental caries calibration

OBJECTIVES: (a) To analyze the intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility (reliability) of a calibration trial, at different diagnostic thresholds of dental caries; (b) to verify the accuracy (benchmark validity) though sensitivity (S), specificity (SP), positive (PPV) and negative predictive (NPV) values. PARTICIPANTS: A group of dental examiners (n=11), who had previous experience in epidemiological surveys and six to seven-year-old children. Children were selected according to the dmft and dental caries activity. METHODS: Theoretical and clinical training and calibration exercises were arranged for a total of 28 hours. WHO criteria including the active initial lesions (IL) were used. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: WHO and WHO+IL diagnostic thresholds according to tooth and dental surface. RESULTS: Excellent mean results of intra and inter-examiner Kappa values were found for both diagnostic thresholds, according to tooth and surface, during the calibration phase. The most relevant errors were related to IL diagnosis and to the first permanent molars. When assessed against a benchmark examiner, moderate to high validity values were observed (0.71-1.00), with some loss mainly for sensitivity and positive predictive value, when including IL. CONCLUSION: It was possible and feasible to use the proposed methodology of this study in epidemiological surveys, even with the inclusion of IL. However, further examiner calibration studies are still needed in order to improve and establish a methodology of calibration with this new diagnostic threshold.     

A comparison of root caries diagnosis based on visual-tactile criteria and DIAGNOdent in vivo

Objectives

This clinical study aimed to evaluate the validity of using DIAGNOdent in diagnosing root caries, and to assess the sensitivity and specificity of different cut-off DIAGNOdent values in assessing root caries with reference to visual-tactile criteria.

Methods

Exposed root surfaces were assessed by one examiner for root caries on 266 subjects using visual-tactile criteria and DIAGNOdent 2095 after dental scaling. Associations between DIAGNOdent values and visual-tactile diagnosis of root caries were determined. The cut-off level for statistical significance was 0.05. The sensitivity and specificity of DIAGNOdent with difference cut-off points were analysed compared to visual-tactile diagnosis of root caries.

Results

There was significant difference between DIAGNOdent values obtained from sound and carious root surfaces (p < 0.001). On carious surfaces, active root caries obtained significantly higher DIAGNOdent values than inactive root caries (p < 0.001). With increasing cut-off point DIAGNOdent values from 5 to 35, sensitivity decreased from 91.4% to 16.2% and specificity increased from 64.4% to 98.2%. A cut-off point of DIAGNOdent value between 5 and 10 produced the highest combined sensitivity and specificity.

Conclusions

There was a significant difference in DIAGNOdent values between sound and carious root surfaces diagnosed by visual-tactile criteria supporting the validity of DIAGNOdent for assessing root caries. A DIAGNOdent value between 5 and 10 produced the highest combined sensitivity and specificity when visual-tactile assessment of root caries was regarded as the criterion. These findings have implications in using and explaining DIAGNOdent values in assessing root caries.     

A simplified dental examination for detection of cavitated carious lesions in school setting

Objective:  The objective of the study was to compare a simplified dental examination involving the use of a wooden spatula and a toothpick (TS examination) with the conventional dental mirror and probe examination (MP examination) for detection of cavitated carious lesions in schoolchildren.
Methods:  The study involved three groups of caries-positive schoolchildren aged 4–5, 9–10 and 13–14 years with 179, 188 and 202 children, respectively. All children were examined by a trained and calibrated examiner using a wooden spatula and a toothpick under natural light. After a week the same examiner examined the three groups of children by a dental mirror and a Community Periodontal Index (CPI) probe. 'Teeth' were considered as units of measurement for data analysis. The WHO recommended criteria (2) for decayed, missing and filled teeth were followed for recording dental caries on a specially designed recording form. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, false-positive rate and false-negative rate of TS examination were calculated using MP examination as the standard method.
Results:  The specificity of TS examination was well above 95% in three types of dentition. Although the sensitivity of this type of examination in deciduous and mixed dentitions was almost comparable with that of MP examination, it was the lowest for permanent dentition but still within the acceptable limits.
Conclusion:  The TS examination can provide an alternative to traditional MP examination to undertake regular check-ups of schoolchildren for dental caries.     

Assessment criteria for compliance with oral hygiene: application of ROC analysis

PURPOSE: Diabetes is an established risk factor for periodontal disease. Management of periodontal disease is highly dependent upon effective oral hygiene. Assessment of plaque and gingivitis has been commonly used and arbitrarily set in clinical practice to evaluate patients' adherence with oral hygiene recommendations. This study aims to determine an objective cut-off criterion for assessing oral hygiene compliance utilising a combination of plaque and bleeding scores. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 161 patients with diabetes, from a prospective clinical trial, provided the clinical periodontal parameters at baseline to be used to determine the oral hygiene compliance criterion in relation to a composite score of pocket depth, subgingival calculus and supragingival calculus. A sequence of different combinations of plaque and gingival bleeding scores were used. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve assessment, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were utilised for the determination of the criterion. RESULTS: The combination of 25% plaque scores and 15% gingival bleeding scores obtained the highest ROC value (using a probability cut-off of 0.5) of 0.868 with sensitivity 98.6%, specificity 75.0%, positive predictive value (PPV) 97.3% and negative predictive value (NPV) 85.7%. According to this criterion, amongst the cohort of subjects examined, 145 (90.1%) were categorised as non-compliant, and only 16 (9.9%) were considered compliant with oral hygiene at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Based upon the clinical periodontal parameters of subjects from this study, a combination of 25% plaque score and 15% bleeding score appears to be a valid target for determining compliance with oral hygiene in oral health programmes.