Hand-assisted Laparoscopic Aortoiliac Surgery: Preliminary Report of 25 cases

Introduction: Since a few years vascular surgeons are developing laparoscopic vascular techniques. We report our preliminary results in this area, using the hand-assisted technique.

Materials and methods: Twenty-five patients were operated between February and December 2001 using the HandPort®-system. Indications were occlusive aortoiliac disease or infrarenal aortoiliac aneurysmal disease. Results: Mean operating time was 180’; mean aortic clamping time was 37’; mean blood loss was 521 mL. Mean laparotomy length was 7,9 cm. A conversion to a larger laparotomy was necessary in two patients. Mean hospital stay was seven days. Operative mortality was 4% (one postoperative death).

Conclusions: Hand-assisted laparoscopic aortoiliac surgery is feasible in community hospital settings.     

Robot-assisted aortoiliac reconstruction: A review of 30 cases

OBJECTIVE: The feasibility of laparoscopic aortic surgery with robotic assistance has been sufficiently demonstrated. Reported is the clinical experience of robot-assisted aortoiliac reconstruction for occlusive disease and aneurysm performed using the da Vinci system. METHODS: Between November 2005 and June 2006, 30 robot-assisted laparoscopic aortoiliac procedures were performed. Twenty-seven patients were prospectively evaluated for occlusive disease, two patients for abdominal aortic aneurysm, and one for common iliac artery aneurysm. Dissections of the aorta and iliac arteries were performed laparoscopically using a transperitoneal direct approach technique, a modification of the Stádler method. The robotic system was used to construct anastomoses, to perform thromboendarterectomies and, in most of the cases, for posterior peritoneal suturing. RESULTS: Robot-assisted procedures were successfully performed in all patients. The robot was used to perform both the abdominal aortic and common iliac artery aneurysm anastomoses, the aortoiliac reconstruction with patch, and to complete the central, end-to-side anastomosis in another operation. Median operating time was 236 minutes (range, 180 to 360 minutes), with a median clamp time of 54 minutes (range, 40 to 120 minutes). Operative time is defined as the time elapsed from the initial incision to final skin closure. Median anastomosis time was 27 minutes (range, 20 to 60 minutes), and median blood loss was 320 mL (range, 100 to 1500 mL). No conversion was necessary, 30-day survival was 100%, median intensive care unit stay was 1.8 days, and median hospital stay was 5.3 days. A regular oral diet was resumed after a mean time of 2.5 days. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery is a feasible technique for aortoiliac surgery. The da Vinci robotic system facilitated the creation of the aortic anastomosis and shortened aortic clamp time in comparison with our laparoscopic techniques.     

Operative results and outcome of twenty-four totally laparoscopic vascular procedures for aortoiliac occlusive disease

Purpose: The study objective was to apply laparoscopic techniques to conventional bypass procedures for aortoiliac occlusive disease. Methods: From October 1995 to August 1997, we performed seven iliofemoral (IFB), five unilateral aortofemoral (UAFB), and 11 aortobifemoral (AFB) bypass procedures and one aortic endarterectomy (TEA) totally laparoscopic. A transabdominal approach with pneumoperitoneum was preferred, and only laparoscopic vascular instruments were used. Endoscopic intervention followed principles of vascular surgery. As in open surgery, we used Dacron grafts and polypropylene sutures. Results: Twenty procedures were carried out totally laparoscopic; four conversions to open surgery were necessary. Severe complications included one postoperative respiratory failure requiring ventilatory support for four days, and one iliac vein lesion with subsequent open surgery. Mean operating time was 258 ± 49 minutes for IFB, 218 ± 54 minutes for UAFB, 279 ± 69 minutes for AFB, and 290 minutes for aortic TEA. Mean blood loss was 92 ± 49 ml for IFB, 390 ± 316 ml for UAFB, 563 ± 516 ml for AFB, and 100 ml for aortic TEA. Mean postoperative stay was 7.4 days for IFB, 7.8 days for UAFB, and 10.1 days for AFB. After the aortic TEA, the patient was discharged on day 6. At control examination all grafts were patent; two patients had mild claudication because of one progressive disease and one distal suture stenosis. Conclusion: Laparoscopic vascular surgery for aortoiliac occlusive disease is feasible, safe, and effective. At the beginning, a cooperation between experienced laparoscopists and vascular surgeons is needed to overcome procedural challenge, because operating time and conversion rate decrease with growing experience. The advantages observed in the majority of our patients were minimal tissue trauma, decreased blood loss, and faster postoperative recovery when compared with patients who had open aortic surgery at our institution. Further evidence has to be gained by clinical trials to define the role of laparoscopic vascular surgery for aortoiliac occlusive disease. (J Vasc Surg 1998;28:136-42.)     

Laparoscopy versus open left lateral segmentectomy for recurrent pyogenic cholangitis

Background: Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis (RPC) is a common disease in Southeast Asia. Its classical presentation is repeated attacks of cholangitis with multiple recurrences of bile duct stones. The stones are commonly located in the left lateral segments (2 and 3) and therefore complete clearance is difficult to achieve by either endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or surgical exploration of the common bile duct. The definitive treatment usually involves resection of the stone-harboring segments. The recent advent in laparoscopic surgery has shown that hand-assisted laparoscopic segmentectomy is a safe and feasible, alternative. This study aimed to compare hand-assisted laparoscopic segmentectomy with open segmentectomy in patients with recurrent, RPC. Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed a prospectively maintained database of both open and laparoscopic treatments for RPC in a single center between 1994 and 2004. During this period, patients with RPC and left intrahepatic (segments 2 and 3) ductal stones not amendable to endoscopic treatment were recruited for analysis. Patients with concomitant gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones were offered left lateral segmentectomy with cholecystectomy and exploration of the common bile duct. Selected patients would have choledochoduodenostomy drainage during the same operation. The operations were performed via either the hand-assisted laparoscopic approach or the open approach using an ultrasonic surgical aspirator. The two cohorts were compared with respect to perioperative parameters to determine whether there would be any advantage in attempting hand-assisted laparoscopic segmentectomy. Results: During the study period from 1994 to 2004, 17 patients underwent left lateral segmentectomy for RPC. Of the 17 patients, 10 had hand-assisted laparoscopic resections, and 7 underwent open resections. All open resections were performed before 1999. Despite the small number of patients and potential type 2 error, there were no differences in age, sex distribution, number of cholangitic attacks, sessions of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography before surgery, or number of previous operation between the two groups. The median operating time was shorter in the open group (232.5 vs 150 min; p = 0.007), whereas the median blood loss was similar (350 vs 400 ml; p = 0.551). The median postoperative stay was 8 days for hand-assisted laparoscopic group versus 14 days for the open group. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.019). There was one open conversion in the hand-assisted laparoscopic group because of intraoperative bleeding from the left hepatic vein. Postoperative complication rates were lower in hand-assisted laparoscopic group, but the difference was not statistically significant (20% vs 57%; p = 126). The intramuscular pethidine requirement again was less in hand-assisted laparoscopic group (0 vs 600 mg; p = 0.002). There was no operative mortality in either group of patients. No recurrent cholangitis was noted in either groups during the median follow-up period of more than 3 years. Conclusion: This study not only confirmed the feasibility of hand-assisted laparoscopic segmentectomy for recurrent pyogenic cholangitis, but also showed that this treatment approach is associated with less pain and shorter hospital stay. However, hand-assisted laparoscopic segmentectomy is a lengthier operation and technically more challenging. Nevertheless, the authors believe that with more experience and further improvement of ancillary technology, this procedure can become a standard treatment for recurrent pyogenic cholangitis in selected cases.     

Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy: initial experience and outcomes

Background: Although surgical resection currently is the preferred treatment for fit patients with resectable esophageal cancers, it is associated with a relatively high risk of morbidity and significant perioperative mortality. Currently, a range of open surgical approaches are used. More recently, minimally invasive approaches have become feasible, with the potential to reduce perioperative morbidity. This study investigated the outcomes from one such approach. Methods: Outcome data were collected prospectively for 36 consecutive patients who underwent a minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. A three-stage approach was used, with all the patients undergoing a thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization, combined with either open or hand-assisted laparoscopic abdominal gastric mobilization, and open cervical anastomosis. An open abdominal approach was used for 15 of the patients and a hand-assisted laparoscopic approach for 21. A total of 34 patients had invasive malignancy, whereas 2 had preinvasive disease. A group of 23 patients (68%) who had invasive malignancies also received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Results: The mean operating time ranged from 190 to 360 min (mean, 263 min). The median postoperative hospital stay was 16 days. In-hospital mortality was 5.5% (2/36), and perioperative morbidity was 41%. The perioperative outcomes for patients undergoing an open abdominal approach and those who had hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery were similar. For the patients who underwent a hand-assisted laparoscopic abdominal procedure, the total operating time was shorter (248 vs 281 min), and the blood loss was less (223 vs 440 ml). The median follow-up period was 30 months. The 4-year survival predicted by Kaplan–Meir for the 34 patients with invasive malignancy was 44%. Conclusion: The outcome for esophagectomy using thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization, with or without hand-assisted laparoscopic abdominal surgery, was comparable with data from conventional open surgical approaches. These approaches can be performed with an acceptable level of perioperative morbidity. Further application of these techniques, with close scrutiny of outcome data, is appropriate.     

Total laparoscopic aortic repair for occlusive and aneurysmal disease: first 95 cases.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the outcome of our preliminary experience with total laparoscopic aortic repair in patients with occlusive or aneurysmal disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From September 2002 to April 2005, we performed 95 consecutive total laparoscopic aortic repair procedures including 72 for aortic occlusive disease (group A) and 23 for abdominal aortic aneurysm (group B). RESULTS: In group A, mean operating time was 216+/-50 min with a mean clamp time of 57+/-21 min and surgical conversion was required in two cases (2.7%). No postoperative death occurred but there were three postoperative complications necessitating re-intervention (retroperitoneal hematoma, embolic ischemia, and early prosthetic infection). Mean duration of hospitalization was 8 days (range, 5-42 days). All grafts were patent at 2 months. In group B, mean operating time was 251+/-57 min with a mean clamp time of 101+/-15 min and surgical conversion was required in seven cases (30%). There was one postoperative death (4.3%) due to pulmonary embolism and one non-fatal complication (retroperitoneal hematoma). Mean duration of hospitalization was 6.4 days (range, 4-12 days). All grafts were patent at 2 months. CONCLUSION: Total laparoscopic repair is feasible and safe for occlusive and aneurysmal aortic disease. Operators must acquire technical skills using simulators.     

Hand-assisted laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass for occlusive disease. Early and mid-term results.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the early and mid-term results of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) for aorto-iliac reconstruction. DESIGN: Prospective survey. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between February 2002 and January 2004, 46 patients received an aortobifemoral bypass for advanced occlusive disease by HALS. RESULT: There was one conversion to open surgery. Mortality was 4.5%. The median return to solid oral diet took 36 h (24-182), the median hospital stay was 5 days (3-26). Primary patency rate at 1 year was 97.5%. The incidence of incisional hernia was 19.5%. CONCLUSIONS: HALS aorto-iliac reconstruction should be considered as a minimal invasive technique with good early and mid-term results.     

A Comparison between Minilaparotomy and Standard Median Laparotomy for Reconstruction of Aorto-Iliac Occlusive Disease

Objective : Minimally invasive surgical procedures have become increasingly used in all surgical branches. In this respect we compared the minilaparotomy (ML) technique with standard median laparotomy (SML) for the surgical treatment of aorto-iliac occlusive disease .

Methods : 120 patients were included in this prospective study, with 60 patients in the minilaparotomy group and 60 patients in standard median laparotomy group. The two approaches were used within the same time period. Both groups were compared in terms of operating and aortic cross clamp time, the amount of blood transfusion, length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital, and time for normalization of bowel functions.

Results : There were no significant differences in terms of the amount of blood transfusion, or aortic cross clamp time. The minilaparotomy approach has the advantages of less operating time, earlier return to a general diet, decreased length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital and reduced cost.

Conclusions : As a conclusion, we believe that the minilaparotomy technique will be the standard treatment of choice for aorto-iliac occlusive disease in the future with reduced use of facilities and lower cost than the laparoscopic or the standard technique.     

Hand-assisted laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass grafting

OBJECTIVE: Aortobifemoral bypass grafting is a durable operation for arterial reconstruction in patients with symptomatic aortoiliac occlusive disease. In several small laparoscopic series technically demanding aortic operations have been described that have not gained widespread acceptance or applicability. To simplify the laparoscopic approach to the aorta, we have developed a technique of aortobifemoral bypass grafting that uses hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) to minimize the complexity of aortic dissection and reconstruction. METHODS: Five patients with symptomatic aortoiliac occlusive disease underwent successful HALS aortobifemoral bypass grafting. With the use of a specialized sleeve device (Hand-Port), an operative hand was introduced into the laparoscopic field while pneumoperitoneum was maintained. Laparoscopic dissection of the infrarenal aorta was then performed with retraction provided by the operative hand. Proximal aortic anastomosis was performed with an open technique through the same 7.5-cm Hand-Port incision, and femoral anastomoses were performed in the standard fashion. RESULTS: Five hand-assisted laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass grafts were performed (two end-to-end, three end-to-side proximal anastomoses). Mean operative time was 231 minutes. Mean blood loss was 440 mL. All patients underwent extubation immediately after surgery, were ambulatory on postoperative day (POD) 1, and were tolerating their diet by POD 3. The mean length of hospital stay was 3.8 days. One patient was discharged on POD 5 and started a clear liquid diet after a self-limiting postoperative ileus. All patients were asymptomatic and back to full activity/work by 14.6 days postoperatively, on average (range, 11-20 days). CONCLUSION: The HALS offers the advantages of tactile feedback, flexible retraction, and the introduction of conventional surgical instruments, all of which extend laparoscopic surgery and its established benefits to a wide array of more complex surgical problems, including major vascular surgery. Ease of performance, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery times all suggest that HALS may become a valuable adjunct to conventional aortobifemoral bypass grafting.     

Minimal invasive approach of gastric and esophageal mobilization in total pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy

Background: To evaluate early results in total pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy (PLE) by minimally invasive approaches for patients suffered from pharyngoesophageal tumor. Methods: Between April 1998 and September 2001, 12 consecutive patients underwent either total laparoscopic (n = 9) or hand-assisted laparoscopic (n = 3) gastric mobilization plus transhiatal esophageal resection in total PLE. The operative data and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. Results: Total PLE by minimally invasive approach was successfully performed in 11 patients, and 1 patient required conversion due to uncontrolled bleeding. The median total operative time was 8.5 h (range, 5–11 h) and the abdominal laparoscopic stage usually took less than 4 h. The median time for extubation was 2 days (range, 1–4 days) and the median ICU stay was 2 days (range, 1–20 days). There was no 30-day mortality, and major complications occurred in 5 patients (42%). Conclusion: Minimally invasive PLE is a feasible and safe alternative to conventional open surgery for patients with pharyngoesophageal carcinoma.     

Hand-assisted videolaparoscopic surgery of the abdominal aorta: preliminary experience with the first 9 cases

Laparoscopic surgery decreases postoperative pain, shortens hospital stay, and returns patients to full functional status more quickly than open surgery in a variety of surgical procedures. This study was undertaken to evaluate laparoscopic techniques as applied to aortic surgery. Nine patients underwent elective hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery, 8 for obliterative disease and 1 for an aneurysm of the abdominal aorta. Five patients had a left aorto-femoral bypass, 3 patients an aorto-bifemoral bypass, and 1 patient an aorto-aortic bypass after aneurysmectomy. There were no laparotomic conversions and all procedures were completed with transperitoneal hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Mean aortic clamping time was 39 minutes and mean operative time 194 minutes. Mean blood loss was 500 ml and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 4.2 days without major complications. At control examinations all grafts were patent. Hand-assisted laparoscopic aortic surgery is feasible, safe, and effective. In selected cases it may be a valid surgical procedure in addition to conventional and endovascular surgery. The advantages observed in our patients were minimal tissue trauma, less postoperative pain and faster postoperative recovery.     

Laparoscopic resection of the pancreas: a feasibility study of the short-term outcome

Background: Laparoscopic resection is not an established treatment for tumors of the pancreas. We report our preliminary experience with this innovative approach to pancreatic disease. Methods: Thirty two patients with pancreatic disease were included in the study on an intention-to-treat basis. The preoperative indications for surgery were as follows: neuroendocrine tumors (n=13), unspecified tumors (n=11), cysts (n=2), idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura with ectopic spleen (n=2), annular pancreas (n=1), trauma (n=1), aneurysm of the splenic artery (n=1), and adenocarcinoma (n=1). Results: Enucleations (n=7) and distal pancreatectomy with (n=12) and without splenectomy (n=5) were performed. Three patients underwent laparoscopic exploration only. Four procedures (13%) were converted to an open technique. One resection was converted to a hand-assisted procedure. The mortality rate for patients undergoing laparoscopic resection was 8.3% (two of 24). Complications occurred after resection in nine of 24 procedures (38%). The median hospital stay was 5.5 days (range, 2–22). Postoperatively, opioid medication was given for a median of 2 days (range, 0–13). Conclusion: Resection of the pancreas can be performed safely via the laparoscopic approach with all the potential benefits to the patients of minimally invasive surgery.     

Newly designed retraction devices for intestine control during laparoscopic aortic surgery

Background: Recent clinical studies have demonstrated the feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for aortic occlusive and aneurysmal disease. However, transperitoneal aortic access is compromised by poor exposure in the operative field from uncontrolled bowel. The retractors that are currently available are inadequate for this task. The development of new retractors would help to facilitate laparoscopic aortic surgery. Methods: Six female piglets (28–30 kg) in each group underwent laparoscopy with pneumoperitoneum (12 mmHg). Exposure of the infrarenal aorta and cross-clamping were undertaken through a transperitoneal approach. Two paddles inserted in a polyester bilayer (mobile device, group A) or a mesh net fixed to the abdominal wall (fixed device, group B) were used to retain the bowel. Aortotomy and suturing were performed to mimic a vascular procedure. After bleeding was controlled, the intraabdominal pressure (IAP) was lowered to 6 mmHg, and retraction was assessed for 30 min. The main outcome measures were time to deploy the retractors, time to perform the vascular procedure, time to withdraw the devices, and total procedural time. Blood loss and frequency of retraction failure were also recorded. Results: Mean time to deploy the device was 22 ± 12 min in group A and 36 ± 34 min in group B (n.s.). Vascular surgery time averaged 60 ± 24 min in group A and 68 ± 16 min in group B (n.s.). The times to withdraw the nets were 3.6 ± 1.2 min and 13.5 ± 8.2 min, respectively (p < 0.05). Total surgery time was 155 ± 41 min vs 174 ± 49 min (n.s.). There were six retraction failures, five in group A and one in group B. When lower IAP was used, there was only one failure in each study group. Mean blood loss was <150 ml in both groups. There were no major complications. Conclusions: Both methods provided adequate exposure of the infrarenal aorta. Vascular surgery time and blood loss were similar for both groups. The movable device proved more usable and, at lower IAP, more effective. The results of this study demonstrate effective bowel retraction for laparoscopic aortic surgery. Received: 10 December 1998/Accepted: 13 May 1999     

Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: a single-institution experience

The purpose of this study was to examine the results of a single institution experience with hand-assisted laparoscopic colon resection for benign disease. We conducted a retrospective study of consecutive cases performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons at a single institution. From August 1999 to June 2001, 37 patients underwent hand-assisted laparoscopic colon resection. Seventeen patients were male, and 20 were female. Median patient age was 58 years (range 20-80). Indications for surgery were: polyp (13), uncomplicated diverticular disease (eight), complicated diverticular disease (i.e., colovesicular fistula, phlegmon, etc.) (seven), chronic constipation (four), rectal prolapse (two), ulcerative colitis (one), endometriosis (one), and fecal incontinence (one). Procedures performed were: sigmoidectomy (14), right colectomy (nine), low anterior resection (seven), subtotal colectomy (five), cecectomy (one), and transverse colectomy (one). Variables examined were: conversion to open procedure, operative time, blood loss, time to return of flatus, length of postoperative hospital stay, and complications. There were no deaths. One case was converted to celiotomy (unable to rule out malignancy). The median operative time was 122 minutes (range 32-240) with a median operative blood loss of 132 mL (range 0-300). Return of flatus was noted (median) at postoperative day 3 (range 1-5), and the median length of stay after operation was 4 days (range 2-8). One patient developed a superficial wound infection, and there was one pelvic abscess (drained percutaneously). One patient developed urinary retention. There were no reoperations. In this single-institution experience hand-assisted laparoscopic elective colectomy for benign disease was successful in both straightforward and complicated cases. A low conversion rate to celiotomy and favorable operative times compared with published "pure" laparoscopic results suggest a flatter learning curve for handoscopy while retaining the benefits of "minimally invasive" surgery such as early return of flatus and short postoperative hospital stay. For these reasons hand-assisted laparoscopy should be considered an acceptable technique in elective colon resection for benign disease.     

Video-assisted aortic surgery

BACKGROUND: There are several laparoscopic techniques that can be used to perform a total or video-assisted aorto-femoral bypass grafting procedure. Major drawbacks of laparoscopic aortic surgery are the long operating times and the steep learning curve required for these procedures. Hand-assisted laparoscopy is a novel technique that allows surgeons to use their hands and laparoscopic instruments in the operative field while maintaining a pneumoperitoneum. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective nonrandomized study was conducted in a community medical center. Any patient with aortoiliac occlusive disease or an abdominal aortic aneurysm who was determined to be suitable for a laparoscopic aorto-femoral bypass grafting procedure was included in the study. The main outcomes measured were: operating time, aortic cross-clamp time, incision size, complications, conversion rate to an open procedure, length of stay in the ICU, and postprocedural hospital stay. A concurrent control group of 20 patients was compared with the minimally invasive group. RESULTS: Forty-one consecutive patients were scheduled for the laparoscopic operation. Conversion to an open procedure was necessary in three patients. There were two major complications, including the development of renal failure in one patient who died 28 days postoperatively. The mean postprocedural hospital stay was 4.5 +/- 2.5 days (range 2 to 15 days). The mean operating time was 163.1 +/- 38.7 minutes, including an aortic cross-clamp time of 38.3 +/- 9.7 minutes. Postoperative hospital stay and the time required in the ICU were significantly shorter after the laparoscopic procedure compared with a conventional bypass grafting procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Hand-assisted laparoscopy is a minimally invasive technique with operating times and outcomes similar to those of conventional procedures. The possibilities of this technique in patients with aortoiliac disease should be evaluated in a prospective randomized study.     

Surgical Treatment of Liver Echinococcosis — the Role of Laparoscopy

Background: The surgical approach to liver echinococcosis is still a controversial issue. This study shows our results of surgical treatment of liver hydatid cysts during a 5-year period.

Methods: A prospective study of 21 patients operated on in a 5-year period (1999–2003), in Dubrava University Hospital in Zagreb, Croatia, with hepatic hydatid cyst. All patients were pre-operatively treated with albendazole. In 12 patients, total pericystectomy without opening the cyst cavity was performed, 9 open and 3 laparoscopic. In the other 9 patients, partial pericystectomy was done, 6 open and 3 laparoscopic.

Results: There was no mortality after 5–65 months follow-up, but in 1 patient, in the open partial pericystectomy group, recurrence of the disease occurred after 3 years. When a laparoscopic procedure was done, there were no complications or recurrence. The median operative duration for open surgery was 100.0 min (range 60.0-210.0), and for laparoscopic surgery 67.5 min (range 60.0-120.0). The median length of hospitalisation for open surgery was 8.0 days (range 7.014.0), and for laparoscopic surgery 5.0 days (range 4.0-7.0).

Conclusion: Total pericystectomy without opening the cyst cavity, preceded by pre-operative albendazole therapy is the method of choice for hepatic hydatid cyst treatment. Despite the small group of patients, our first results show laparo-scopic total pericystectomy without opening the cyst cavity, in the treatment of hepatic hydatid cyst, as a good alternative to open surgery in selected patients.     

Total laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass.

AIM: To assess the feasibility of aortobifemoral bypass by a laparoscopic approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS: During November 2002 through July 2003 a total of 21 patients with aorto-iliac occlusive disease underwent total laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass surgery. RESULTS: The median operative time was 240 (range 150-420) min with a median aortic cross-clamp time of 60 (30-120) min. Operating time was reduced with experience. The median blood loss was 500 (100-2500) ml. One conversion to open surgery for acute dilation of the small bowel was necessary. Post-operative complications occurred in five patients (coagulation problems, disseminated intravascular coagulation secondary to thrombosis of the left limb, cerebro-vascular accident, dyspnoea, lymph leak) and there was no peri-operative death. Median hospital stay was 7 (5-30) days. CONCLUSION: Aorto-bifemoral bypass using a total laparoscopic approach can be performed safely. As all new techniques, a learning curve is observed. This new technique should be evaluated in a larger randomised trial to assess its clinical value in comparison to conventional surgery.     

Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Aortobifemoral Bypass for Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease: Early Clinical Experience

BACKGROUND: Robotic technology may facilitate laparoscopic aortic reconstruction. We present our early clinical experience with laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass, aided by two different robotic surgical systems. METHODS: Between February 2002 and April 2004, we performed eight robot-assisted laparoscopic aorto-bifemoral bypasses for aortoiliac occlusive disease. All patients were male; median age was 55 years (range: 36-64). Dissection was performed laparoscopically and the robotic system was used to construct the aortic anastomosis. RESULTS: A robot-assisted anastomosis was successfully performed in seven patients. Median operative time was 405 min (range: 260-589), with a median clamp-time of 111 min (range: 85-205). Median blood loss was 900 ml (range: 200-5800). Median anastomosis time was 74 min (range 40-110). In two patients conversion was necessary, one due to bleeding of an earlier clipped lumbar artery after completion of the anastomosis, the other because of difficulties with the laparoscopic exposure of the aorta. On post-operative day 3 one patient died unexpectedly as a result of a massive myocardial infarction. Median hospital stay was 7.5 days (range: 3-57). CONCLUSION: Our initial experience with robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) shows it is a feasible technique for aortoiliac bypass surgery. However, laparoscopic aortoiliac surgery demands considerable experience and operative times need to be reduced before this technique can be widely implemented.     

Gasless laparoscopic aorto-bifemoral bypass grafting using self-designed abdominal lifting system

Severe aorto-iliac occlusive disease can cause disabling symptoms. The treatment of aorto-iliac occlusive disease has dramatically changed with the introduction of endoluminal techniques. However, according to the Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus for severe aorto-iliac disease, aorto-bifemoral bypass remains the therapy of choice. A recent addition to the open repair is laparoscopic-assisted aorto-bifemoral bypass, especially in occlusive arterial disease. In this article, we describe a new technique of performing gasless laparoscopic-assisted aorto-bifemoral bypass grafting with a self-designed abdominal wall-lifting system. We dealt with a patient who had a history of coronary artery disease and poor cardiopulmonary functional reserve. He had disabling symptoms of claudication and rest pain on bilateral lower extremities. Aorto-biliac-femoral occlusive disease was diagnosed in him, and he underwent the gasless laparoscopic-assisted aorto-bifemoral bypass. The total procedure time was 260 minutes. The patient was extubated 5 hours postoperatively. He was discharged home without complications 5 days after the surgery. This procedure is attractive not only to minimize the length of the wound and the time to extubation but also to avoid the possible lethal complications associated with the traditional laparascopic pneumoperitoneum. This device and technique can also provide a bridge for young or less-experienced surgeons to be familiar with total laparoscopic aortic surgery from traditional open repair.     

Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery of the infrarenal aorta

Background Recently introduced robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) facilitates endoscopic surgical manipulation and thereby reduces the learning curve for (advanced) laparoscopic surgery. We present our learning curve with RALS for aortobifemoral bypass grafting as a treatment for aortoiliac occlusive disease. Methods Between February 2002 and May 2005, 17 patients were treated in our institution with robot-assisted laparoscopic aorto-bifemoral bypasses. Dissection was performed laparoscopically and the robot was used to make the aortic anastomosis. Operative time, clamping time, and anastomosis time, as well as blood loss and hospital stay, were used as parameters to evaluate the results and to compare the first eight (group 1) and the last nine patients (group2). Results Total median operative, clamping, and anastomosis times were 365 min (range: 225–589 min), 86 min (range: 25–205 min), and 41 min (range: 22–110 min), respectively. Total median blood loss was 1,000 ml (range: 100–5,800 ml). Median hospital stay was 4 days (range: 3–57 days). In this series 16/18 anastomoses were completed with the use of the robotic system. Three patients were converted (two in group 1, one in group 2), and one patient died postoperatively (group 1). Median clamping and anastomosis times were significantly different between groups 1 and 2 (111 min [range: 85–205 min] versus 57.5 min [range: 25–130 min], p < 0.01 and 74 min [range: 40–110 min] versus 36 min [range: 22–69 min], p < 0.01, respectively) Total operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay showed no significant difference between groups 1 and 2. Conclusions Robot-assisted aortic anastomosis was shown to have a steep learning curve with considerable reduction of clamping and anastomosis times. However, due to a longer learning curve for laparoscopic dissection of the abdominal aorta, operation times were not significantly shortened. Even with robotic assistance, laparoscopic aortoiliac surgery remains a complex procedure. Presented at SAGES 2006, April 26–29 2006, Dallas, Texas, USA An erratum to this article can be found at