Low vs Standard Pressures in Gynecologic Laparoscopy: a Systematic Review

Background:

The optimal intraperitoneal pressure during laparoscopy is not known. Recent literature found benefits of using lower pressures, but the safety of doing abdominal surgery with low peritoneal pressures needs to be assessed. This systematic review compares low with standard pneumoperitoneum during gynecologic laparoscopy.

Database:

We searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials comparing intraperitoneal pressures during gynecologic laparoscopy. Two authors reviewed references and extracted data from included trials. Risk ratios, mean differences, and standard mean differences were calculated and pooled using RevMan5. Of 2251 studies identified, three were included in the systematic review, for a total of 238 patients. We found a statistically significant but modest diminution in postoperative pain of 0.38 standardized unit based on an original 10-point scale (95% confidence interval [CI], –0.67 to –0.08) during the immediate postoperative period when using low intraperitoneal pressure of 8 mm Hg compared with ≥12 mm Hg and of 0.50 (95% CI, –0.80 to –0.21) 24 hours after the surgery. Lower pressures were associated with worse visualization of the surgical field (risk ratio, 10.31; 95% CI, 1.29–82.38). We found no difference between groups over blood loss, duration of surgery, hospital length of stay, or the need for increased pressure.

Conclusion:

Low intraperitoneal pressures during gynecologic laparoscopy cannot be recommended on the behalf of this review because improvement in pain scores is minimal and visualization of the surgical field is affected. The safety of this intervention as well as cost-effectiveness considerations need to be further studied.     

Role of Laparoscopy in Penetrating Abdominal Trauma: A Systematic Review

Background

Debate remains regarding the optimum role of laparoscopy in the setting of trauma although it can offer advantages over traditional exploratory laparotomy. Laparoscopy can be a screening, diagnostic or therapeutic tool in trauma. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the role of laparoscopy in penetrating abdominal trauma

Methods

The PUBMED database was searched with the keywords “Laparoscopy AND Trauma”. Additional citation searching and searching of the grey literature was conducted. Relevant studies were chosen on the basis of the defined inclusion and exclusion criteria and quality was assessed where appropriate using the Downs and Black checklist

Results

In total, 51 studies were included in the analysis of which only 13 were prospective. In most studies, laparoscopy was used as a screening, diagnostic or therapeutic tool. In total, 2569 patients underwent diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) for penetrating abdominal trauma (PAT), 1129 (43.95 %) were positive for injury. 13.8 % of those with injury had a therapeutic laparoscopy. In total 33.8 % were converted to laparotomy, 16 % of which were non-therapeutic and 11.5 % of them were negative. 1497 patients were spared a non-therapeutic laparotomy. Overall, 72 patients suffered complications, there were 3 mortalities and 83 missed injuries. Sensitivity ranged from 66.7–100 %, specificity from 33.3–100 % and accuracy from 50–100 %. 23 of the 50 studies reported sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 100 %, including the four most recent studies. In general the quality of the reported studies was poor. When used for cohort studies, the mean Downs and Black checklist score was 13.25 out of a possible total of 28.

Conclusions

In summary, laparoscopy in PAT may have an important role in a selected subgroup of patients, with surgeon expertise also an important factor. Laparoscopy has screening, diagnostic and therapeutic roles, particularly where diaphragm injury is suspected. It is extremely sensitive in determining need for laparotomy but detects hollow visceral injuries less reliably. It has potential as a therapeutic tool in centres with appropriate expertise. The development of specific guidelines or protocols may increase the value of laparoscopy in trauma but this would require more evidence of a higher quality.     

The Effectiveness of Surgical Interventions in the Management of Malunited Calcaneal Fractures: A Systematic Review

Nonoperative management may result in calcaneal malunion with consequences of pain, deformity, and functional limitation. The aim of this review was to proffer an evidence-based scientific account of the effectiveness of contemporary surgical procedures in the management of malunited calcaneal fractures after initial conservative management. This systematic review included studies that evaluated the surgical procedures in the management of calcaneal malunion and systematically searched studies published between January 2005 and June 2016. The search was conducted using the following search engines: the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed/ MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Academic Search Premier, and Open Grey. Methodologic assessment was conducted using the Cochrane Risk of Bias In nonrandomized Studies- of Interventions assessment tool version 7. Ten observational studies (212 patients) were included in this review. Five articles explored various means of achieving subtalar arthrodesis, 2 articles evaluated joint-sparing osteotomies, 1 examined corrective osteotomy for extra-articular os calcis malunion, and 2 articles explored combined procedures based on the Stephen and Sanders calcaneal malunion classification. Clinical and methodologic heterogeneity did not allow quantitative pooling of results. The overall risk of bias was considered moderate in 7 studies and 3 were considered at high risk of bias. The inability for any study to be considered at low risk of bias in this review might be mainly attributed to the lack of a valid and reliable outcome measure for the assessment of foot and ankle conditions. There is clear evidence that appropriately indicated procedures are effective in terms of pain alleviation, correction of deformity, and improved function. However, long-term outcomes may improve the acceptability to joint-preserving osteotomies, subtalar arthrodesis with the VIRA implant and subtalar distraction osteogenesis.     

Surgical Skills Lab: A Hub for Competency Training

ABSTRACT

Simulation is considered to be a paradigm shift in surgical education and skills acquisition. Today simulation is accepted to be a new concept not only for Surgery but also for the entire health education. This paper aims to improve the awareness of simulation technology and is to assist those individuals and institutions who are in the process of building a simulation centre or envisioning the formation of a simulation program in their future endeavors. The author shares his experience with the medical community and provides information to access other resources in support of simulation programs.