Adequacy of Pacing Rate During Exercise in Rate Responsive Ventricular Pacing

Our objective was to determint; the adequate pacing rate during exercise in ventricular pacing by measuring exercise capacity, cardiac output, and sinus node activity. Eighteen patients with complete AV block and an implanted pacemaker underwent cardiopulmonary exercise tests under three randomized pacing rates: fixed rate pacing (VVJ) at 60 beats/min and ventricular rate-responsive pacing (VVIR) programmed to attain a heart rate of about 110 beats/min ar 130 beats/min (VVIR 110 and VVIR 130, respectively) at the end of exercise. Compared with VVI and VVIR 130, VVIR 110 was associated with an increased peak oxygen uptake(VVIR 110:20.3 ± 4.5 vs VVI: 16.9 ± 3.1; P < 0.01; and VVIR 130: 19.0 ± 4.1 mL/min per kg, respectively; P < 0.05) and a higher oxygen uptake at anaerobic threshold (15.3 ± 2.7, 12.7 ± 1.9; P < 0.01, and 14.6 ± 2.6 mL/min per kg; P < 0.05). The atrial rate during exercise expressed as a percentage of the expected maximal heart rate was lower in VVIR 110 than in VVI or VVIR 130 (VVIR 110: 75.9%± 14.6% vs VVI: 90.6%± 12.8%; P < 0.01; VVIR 110 vs VVIR 130: 89.1%± 23.1%; P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in cardiac output at peak exercise between VVIR 110 and VVIR 130. We conclude that a pacing rate for submaximal exercise of 110 beats/min may be preferable to that of 130 beats/min in respect to exercise capacity and sympathetic nerve activity.     

Clinical Study of a New Activity Sensor for Rate Adaptive Pacing Controlled by Electrical Signals Generated by the Kinetic Energy of a Moving Magnetic Ball

A new rate adaptive pacemaker (Sensorithm) controlled by an activity sensor providing electrical signals induced by a magnetic ball moving freely in an elliptical cavity surrounded by two copper coils, was implanted in ten patients; mean age of 75 years (range 64–89). Six patients had atrioventricular block and four had sinus node disease. In auto-set testing procedure during a 1-minute walk in the corridor, a slope resulting in a maximum rate of 95 beats/min was selected in every patient, and a medium reaction time was programmed. During graded treadmill exercise tests the heart rate increased 63 ± 7 beats/min to 135 ± 6 beats/min in rate adaptive pacing mode (VVIR), and 15 ± 6 beats/min (P < 0.0001) in ventricular pacing mode (VVI). The symptom-limited exercise time was 9.1 ± 1.1 minutes and 8.2 ±1.2 minutes (P = NS), and the exercise distance was 501 ± 95 meters and 428 ± 92 meters (P < 0.05) in VVIR and VVI pacing mode, respectively. The maximum oxygen uptake was 20.6 ± 2.6 mL/kg per minute in VVIR pacing and 18.1 ± 2.1 mL/kg per minute (P < 0.05) in VVI pacing. The delay time until the pacing rate increased 10% of the total rate increase at onset of treadmill exercise was 4.4 ± 0.7 seconds. Assuming a linear relation between metabolic workload and heart rate response from rest to the age predicted maximum heart rate, a deviation of heart rate ranging from 13.5 ± 11.2% to –1.6 ± 5.2% from the expected heart rate at mid-point and endpoint of each quartile of workload was observed during treadmill testing. Conclusions : By using a 1 -minute walk test for selecting an appropriate slope setting, Sensorithm provided a significant and proportional heart rate increase during exercise resulting in an improvement of exercise capacity during VVIR pacing compared to VVI pacing.     

New Concept in Activity-Controlled Pacemakers: Clinical Results With an Accelerometer-Based Rate Adaptive Pacing System

An accelerometer-based rate adaptive generator (EXCEL VR) has been introduced. A preclinical group of 22 subjects with strap-on devices was observed and reported. A clinical protocol including observation of rate adaptive response to typical daily activities and incremental exercise on a treadmill was administered in seven implanted patients. Indications for implantation in these patients was either second- or third-degree atrioventricular block (five patients, VVIR pacing mode) and sick sinus syndrome (two patients, AAIR pacing mode). Mean pacing rates were 50 ppm (supine), 56 ppm (standing), 77 ppm (descending the stairs), 81 ppm (slow walk), 83 ppm (slow stair climb), 91 ppm (fast walk), and 92 ppm (fast stair climb). When the arm proximal to the pulse generator was exercised, the rate rose to 92 ppm. When the distal arm was strained, the rate was 63 ppm. During treadmill testing, rates between 82 ppm (2 km/hour) and 104 ppm (5 km/hour) were observed. This accelerometer-based rate adaptive pulse generator provided a proportional response to graded activities of treadmill exercise and daily living in these groups of preclinical and clinical subjects.     

Superior Cardiac Hemodynamics of Atrioventricular Synchrony Over Rate Responsive Pacing at Submaximal Exercise: Observations in Activity Sensing DDDR Pacemakers

LAU, C.-P., ET AL.: Superior Cardiac Hemodynamics of Atrioventricular Synchrony Over Rate Responsive Pacing at Submaximal Exercise: Observations in Activity Sensing DDDR Pacemakers. The relative hemodynamic profile between dual chamber pacing (DDD) and activity sensing rate responsive pacing (VVIR) was compared in ten patients with dual chamber rate responsive pacemakers (Synergist 11). With a double blind, randomized exercise protocol, DDDR pacemakers were programmed into VVI, VVIR, and DDD (AV interval 150 msec) modes and in seven patients the test in the DDD mode was repeated with the AV interval programmed at 75 msec. A treadmill exercise test of 6-minutes duration (2 stages, Stage 1 at 2 mph, 0% gradient and Stage II at 2 mph, 15% gradient) was performed at each of the programmed settings, with a rest period of 30 minutes in between tests. Cardiac output was assessed using continuous-wave Doppler sampling ascending aortic flow and expressed as a percentage of the value achieved during VVI pacing. During exercise, pacing rate between DDD and VVIR pacing was similar but was higher with DDD at the first minute of recovery (91 ± 4vs 81 ± 3 beat/min, respectively). Cardiac output was significantly higher at rest, during low level exercise, and recovery with DDD pacing compared with VVIR pacing (resting: 21 ± 14 vs -2 ± 7%; Stage I: 36 ± 6 vs 16 ± 7%; Stage II: 25 ± 15 vs 10 ± 8%; recovery: 26 ± 12 vs 4 ± 9%; p < 0.05 in all cases). Systolic blood pressure was significantly higher during low level of exercise in the DDD mode. Shortening of the AV interval to 75 msec did not significantly affect cardiac output during exercise, but cardiac output after exercise was reduced (2 ± 6 vs 23 ± 6% at an AV interval of 150 msec, p < 0.02). By enhancing the stroke volume, DDD pacing improves cardiac hemodynamics at rest, during low level exercise, and early postexercise recovery.     

Efficacy of Ventricular Rate Stabilization by Right Ventricular Pacing During Atrial Fibrillation

To assess the effect of right ventricular pacing on rate regularity during exercise and daily life activities, 16 patients with sinoatrial disease and chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) were studied. Incremental ventricular pacing was commenced at 40 beats/min until > 95% of ventricular pacing were achieved during supine, sitting, and standing. Thirteen patients also underwent randomized paired submaximal exercise tests in either a fixed rate mode (VVI) or a ventricular rate stabilization (VRS) mode in which the pacingrate was set manually at 10 beats/min above the average AF rate duringthe last minute of each exercise stage. The pacing interval for rate regularization was shortest during standing (692 ± 26 ms) compared with either supine or sitting (757 ± 30 and 705 ± 26 ms, respectively, P < 0.05). During exercise, VRS pacing significantly increased the maximum rate (119 ± 5.2 vs 106 ± 4.2 ms, P < 0.05), percent of ventricular pacing (85%± 5% vs 23%± 7%, P < 0.05), rate regularity index (5.8%± 1.6% vs 13.4%± 1.9%, P < 0.05), and maximum level of oxygen consumption (12.4 ± 0.5 vs 11.3 ± 0.5 ml/kg, P < 0.05) compared with VVI pacing. There was no change in oxygen pulse or difference in symptom scores in this acute study between the two pacing modes. It is concluded that right ventricular pacing may significantly improve rate regularity and cardiopulmonary performance in patients with chronic AF. This may be incorporated in a pacing device for rate regularization of AF using an algorithm that is rate adaptive to postural and exercise stresses.     

Effects of Chronotropic Responsive Cardiac Pacing on Ventilatory Response to Exercise in Patients with Complete AV Block

To identify the effect of chronotropic responsive cardiac pacing on the ventilatory response to exercise, ten selected patients with complete atrioventricular block underwent paired cardiopulmonary exercise tests in fixed rate ventricular (WI) and dual chamber (DDD) or rate responsive ventricular (VVIR) pacing modes. Compared to VVI pacing, DDD or VVIR pacing increased peak oxygen uptake (P < 0.005) and augmented anaerobic threshold (P < 0.001), In eight patients, dyspnea was the major symptom limiting exercise with VAT pacing and this was markedly attenuated with DDD or VVIR pacing. In all patients, ventilation (VE) and the ratio of ventilation to CO₂ production (VE/VCO₂) were consistently higher with VVI pacing during exercise. To compare the response of the two pacing modes at the same workloads in an aerobic condition, we measured ventilatory variables 1 minute prior to the anaerobic threshold obtained with VVI pacing. When DDD or VVIR pacing was compared with VVI pacing, VE and VE/VCO₂ significantly decreased from 20.5 ± 5.3 L/min to 18.3 ± 5.0 L/min (P < 0.005) and from 35.9 ± 5.8 to 31.9 ± 5.0 (P < 0.003), respectively. Respiratory frequency rose significantly more with VVI pacing (P < 0.001) despite an unchanged tidal vohame. Although peak VE did not differ between the two pacing modes, VE/VCO₂ at the peak exercise increased significantly more with VVI pacing (P < 0.005). Respiratory frequency also rose more with VVI pacing (P < 0.005) and tidal volume did not change. This study suggests that chronotropic responsive cardiac pacing attenuates the exertional dyspnea by improving the ventilatory response to exercise as well as increasing the cardiac output in patients with complete atrioventricular block.     

The Effects of Rate-Adaptive Atrial Pacing Versus Ventricular Backup Pacing on Exercise Capacity in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Background: Atrial rate-adaptive pacing may improve cardiopulmonary reserve in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
Methods: A randomized, blinded, single-crossover design enrolled dual-chamber implantable defibrillator recipients without pacing indications and an ejection fraction ≤40% to undergo cardiopulmonary exercise treadmill stress testing in both atrial rate-adaptive pacing (AAIR) and ventricular demand pacing (VVI) pacing modes. The primary endpoint was change in peak oxygen consumption (VO₂). Secondary endpoints were changes in anaerobic threshold, perceived exertion, exercise duration, and peak blood pressure.
Results: Ten patients, nine males, eight with New York Heart Association class I, mean ejection fraction 24 ± 7%, were analyzed. Baseline VO₂ was 3.6 ± 0.5 mL/kg/min. Heart rate at peak exercise was significantly higher during AAIR versus VVI pacing (142 ± 18 vs 130 ± 23 bpm; P = 0.05). However, there was no difference in peak VO₂ (AAIR 23.7 ± 6.1 vs VVI 23.8 ± 6.3 mL/kg/min; P = 0.8), anaerobic threshold (AAIR 1.3 ± 0.3 vs VVI 1.2 ± 0.2 L/min; P = 0.11), rate of perceived exertion (AAIR 7.3 ± 1.5 vs VVI 7.8 ± 1.2; P = 0.46), exercise duration (AAIR 15 minutes, 46 seconds ± 2 minutes, 54 seconds vs VVI 16 minutes, 3 seconds ± 2 minutes, 48 seconds; P = 0.38), or peak systolic blood pressure (AAIR 155 ± 22 vs VVI 153 ± 21; P = 0.61) between the two pacing modes.
Conclusion: In this study, AAIR pacing did not improve peak VO_2, anaerobic threshold, rate of perceived exertion, or exercise duration compared to VVI backup pacing in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and no pacing indications.     

Two-Year Experience with Rate-Modulated Pacing Controlled by Mixed Venous Oxygen Saturation

Mixed venous oxy-hemoglobin saturation (M_VO₂) is a physiological variable with several features that might be desirable as a control parameter for rate adaptive pacing. Despite these desirable characteristics, the long-term reliability of the M_VO₂ sensor in vivo is uncertain. We, therefore, designed a study to prospectively evaluate the long-term performance of a permanently implanted M_VO₂ saturation sensor in patients requiring VVIR pacing. Under an FDA approved feasibility study, eight patients were implanted with a VVIR pulse generator and a right ventricular pacing lead incorporating an M_VO₂ sensor. In order to accurately assess long-term stability of the sensor, patients underwent submaximal treadmill exercise using the Chronotropic Assessment Exercise Protocol (CAEP) at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months following pacemaker implantation. Paired maximal exercise testing using the CAEP was also performed with the pacing system programmed to the VVI and VVIR modes in randomized sequence with measurement of expired gas exchange after 6 weeks and 12 months of follow-up. During maximal treadmill exercise the peak exercise heart rate (132 ± 9 vs 71.5 ± 5 beats/min, P < 0.00001) and maximal rate of oxygen consumption (1,704 ± 633 vs 1382 ± 407 mL/min, P = 0.01) were significantly greater in the VVIR than in the VVI pacing mode. Similarly, the duration of exercise was greater in the VVIR than the VVI pacing mode (8.9 ± 3.6 min vs 7.6 ± 3.7 min, P = 0.04). The resting M_VO₂ and the M_VO₂ at peak exercise were similar in the VVI and VVIR pacing modes (P = NS). However, the M_VO₂ at each comparable treadmill exercise stage was significantly higher in the VVIR mode than in the VVI mode (CAEP stage 1 (P = 0.005), stage 2 (P = 0.04), stage 3 (P = 0.008), and stage 4 (P = 0.04). The correlation between M_VO₂ and oxygen consumption (VO₂) was excellent (r = -0.93). Telemetry of the reflectance of red and infrared light and M_VO₂ in the right ventricle during identical exercise workloads revealed no significant change over the first 12 months of follow-up (ANOVA, P = NS). The chronotropic response to exercise remained proportional to VO₂ in all patients over the first 12 months of follow-up. The time course of change in M_VO₂ during maximal exercise was significantly faster than for VO₂. At the 18- and 24-month follow-up exercise tests, a significant deterioration of the sensor signal with attenuation of chronotropic response was noted for 4 of the 8 subjects with replacement of the pacing system required in one patient because of lack of appropriate rate modulation. Rate modulated VVIR pacing controlled by right ventricular M_VO₂ provides a chronotropic response that is highly correlated with VO₂. This parameter responds rapidly to changes in workload with kinetics that are more rapid than those of VO₂. Appropriate rate modulation provides a higher M_VO₂ at identical workloads than does VVI pacing. Although the M_VO₂ sensor remains stable and accurate over the first year following implantation, significant deterioration of the signal occurs by 18–24 months in many patients.     

Quality of Life in Patients with Rate Responsive Pacemakers: A Randomized, Cross-Over Study

Eleven patients with rate responsive pacemakers (7 men, 4 women, mean age 41 years with a range of 23-60) were randomly assigned to a cross-over study in order to assess their overall exercise capacity and quality-of-life (QOL) scores. All of the pacemakers were implanted for complete AV block or sick sinus syndrome. The pacemakers were randomly programmed into VVI or rate responsive (VVIR) pacing modes for 3-week study periods in each mode. At the end of each period, an exercise test was performed and the QOL was evaluated by the "Hacettepe Quality-of-Life Questionnaire". All patients exercised longer in the VVIR mode (mean 10.54 ± 0,73 min) than in the VVI mode (mean 7.81 ± 0.62 min) (P < 0.05). QOL scores were also found to be significantly higher in the VVIR mode (mean 173.81 ± 16.22 points) compared to the VVI mode (mean 156.27 ± 21.22 points) (P < 0.01). In conclusion, our results suggest that VVIR pacing offers a better QOL in addition to an improved exercise capacity, compared to the single chamber nonrate modulated pacing (VVI).     

Failure of Rate Responsive Ventricular Pacing to Improve Physiological Performance in the Univentricular Heart

The physiological efficacy of single chamber, rate responsive ventricular pacing (VVIR) is unknown for symptomatic patients following the Fontan procedure for univentricular hearts. A total of six postoperative children, ages 6–21 years (mean 13), with symptomatic bradycardia requiring pacing therapy, underwent comparative treadmill exercise testing in randomized fixed rate (VVI) and VVIR pacing modes. In all instances, implanted activity pulse generators (Medtronic Model 8403) were programmed to identical age-appropriate low paced rates during WI and VVIR modes with the upper rate response at 150 ppm. All studies were performed at least 2 weeks apart. Physiological values of heart rate, blood pressure, work rate (watts), oxygen comsumption (VO₂), carbon dioxide production (VCO₂), and respiratory exchange ratio (RER) were monitored continuously during each test using a 1 minute incremental treadmill protocol. Ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT) was calculated from VO₂, VCO₂, and minute ventilation. The results demonstrated that although there was a significant increase in paced heart rate per minute throughout exercise (P < 0.01) with VVIR pacing, maximum watts, VO₂, and VAT remained unchanged. These findings indicate that in spite of an improved chronotropic response to exercise, children with Univentricular hearts following the Fontan procedure continue to demonstrate altered hemodynamics which negate potential benefits of VVIR pacing.     

Dual Sensor VVIR Mode Pacing: Is It Worth It?

Dual sensor ventricular demand rate responsive (VVIR mode) pacing was compared with single sensor rate responsive pacing to assess whether this new development should be more widely incorporated in modern pacemaker devices. A within patient randomized, double-blind crossover study involving ten patients, mean age 67.4 years (70% male), had Medtronic Legend Plus dual sensor VVIR pacemakers implanted for high grade A V block and chronic or persistent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Performance values were compared to 20 healthy control subjects of a similar age and gender. Patients were both subjectively and objectively assessed after 2 weeks of out-of-hospital activity in VVIR mode (minute ventilation sensing), VVIR mode (activity sensing), VVIR mode (dual sensor), and VVI mode (no rate response). All patients were assessed for subjective preference for, and objective improvement in, any pacing modality as assessed by standardized daily activity protocols and graded exercise treadmill testing. Subjective perception of exercise capacity and functional status was significantly lower in VVI mode (P < 0.05) compared to any of the VVIR modes, which did not differ. After completion of the study 70% of patients chose VVIR as their preferred mode, with 30% expressing no preference. Forty percent preferred activity sensor WIR mode pacing, 30% preferred dual sensor VVIR mode pacing, and 70% found either dual sensor WIR mode, minute ventilation sensor WIR mode, or both modalities least acceptable. No patient found activity sensing WIR mode least acceptable. Graded treadmill testing revealed significantly lower exercise tolerance during WI mode pacing (P < 0.01) compared to the VVIR modalities, which did not differ. Overall, chronotropic response was best with dual sensor pacing during standardized daily activity protocols and during the standard car journey. The data from this study suggest that there is no marked clinical advantage obtained from the use of dual sensor devices over current activity sensing ventricular demand rate responsive pacemakers, but with the probable added disadvantages of increased size, complexity, cost, and decreased longevity.     

Efficacy and Safety of Rate Responsive Pacing in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Angina Pectoris

The present study included 17 patients with angina pectoris and coronary artery disease in whom a rate responsive ventricular pacemaker (Medtronic Activitrax) had been implanted. All patients had an exclusively paced rhythm. Single blinded, random, cross-over treadmill tests in the rate responsive pacing mode (VVIR) and in the fixed-rate demand mode (VVI) were performed, with an interval of 4-6 weeks. Mean exercise duration increased by 25% during VVIR pacing. Maximal heart rate increased significantly during VVIR compared to VVI pacing (VVI = 74 +/- 2 bpm, VVIR = 116 +/- 8 bpm, P less than 0.001) as did the rate-pressure product (VVI = 10.850 +/- 1,124, VVIR = 16.628 +/- 2,110, P less than 0.001). Despite improved performance, the number of anginal attacks per week and the nitroglycerin consumption did not show a significant difference between the two pacing modes. It is concluded that rate responsive pacing is beneficial and safe in patients with angina pectoris and coronary artery disease.     

Activity-Sensing Rate Responsive Versus Conventional Fixed-Rate Pacing: A Comparision of Rate Behavior and Patient Well-Being During Routine Daily Exercise

Rate responsive single chamber pacing (WIR) may be the pacemaker of choice in pafients who are not suitable candidates for a dual chamber system. Several studies, most of them performed in an exercise laboratory, have shown a significantly higher exercise capacity demonstrating an improvement in cardiac output and anaerobic threshold compared to conventional fixed rate pacing (VVT). Expressing our idea that stress testing in an “artificial environment” on a bicycle or motor driven treadmill has its limitations and may be difficult to extend into patient's daily life, we designed an outdoor study imitating patient's daily activity. Twenty-one patients with an activity-sensing rate responsive pacemaker performed in a double blind fashion in VVI and VVIR mode the following test circuit: walking 170 meters on flat ground, 210 meters incline, climbing a flight of stairs, and the same circuit in reverse order, and therefore “downhill”. Heart rate behavior was recorded by Holter monitoring and patients subjective feelings of well-being, i.e. fatigue and dyspnea were also evaluated, VVIR pacing responded promptly to exercise, i.e., walking on a flat ground, but no further significant increase in pacing rate was observed in relationship to the strength of physical activity while walking inclined or climbing stairs. While patients became exhausted, a nonphysiological decrease in heart rate sometimes occurred. Despite these limitations 6 of 12 patients who had a paced-only rhythm while exercising in both VVI and VVIR mode reported feeling significantly belter in the VVIR mode, expressing less dyspnea and fatigue. In contrast, two of nine patients having only intermittently paced rhythm preferred the VVIR mode. Patients with lower ejection fraction (EF) were more likely to show subjectively a benefit while exercising in VVIR mode, compared to those with less reduced or normal EF. Despite the technical limitations of using a piezo crystal for rate adaptation, WIR pacing is an important option in paced-only patients, but it seems less beneficial in patients with only intermittent paced rhythm.     

Delayed Exercise Rate Response Kinetics Due to Sensor Cross-Checking in a Dual Sensor Rate Adaptive Pacing System: The Importance of Individual Sensor Programming

By cross-checking the relative sensor activation between a nonspecific and specific sensor during extraneous interference, a multisensor rate adaptive pacemaker may he able to limit inappropriate rate responses. The effects of activity (ACT) sensor programming on rate response kinetics of a QT and ACT dual sensor VVIR pacemaker with sensor cross-checking algorithm were studied in four patients with atrial fibrillation and complete heart block. The rate adaptive setting of each sensor was individually optimized, and an equal rate contribution for the QT and ACT sensors (QT = ACT) was used in the dual sensor VVIR mode. Three maximal treadmill exercise tests were performed in random order in three different VVIR modes driven by QT only, QT = ACT, and in the dual sensor mode with the most sensitive (low threshold) ACT setting. In the two dual sensor modes, the time for onset of rate response (delay time) was reduced (both < 15 sec) compared with QT only VVIR mode (233 ± 70 sec). However, the time to 50% of rate response in the low ACT threshold dual sensor mode was delayed compared with to QT = ACT (450 ± 110 [95% confidence interval 234–666] vs 311 ± 103 [109–513]sec, P < 0.05) and was similar to the QT only mode (401 ± 120 [l66–636]sec). The time to reach 90% of rate response was similar in the three modes tested. The resting activity counts registered by the ACT sensor were < 5 and 16 ± 2 counts/mm in the optimally programmed and low threshold ACT settings, respectively. This resulted in sensor cross-checking at rest in the overprogrammed dual sensor VVIR mode, thereby limiting the rate response. Thus, the combined sensor system provides a faster initial response to exercise than the QT only sensor. Programming the ACT threshold to low will prevent this faster response because of sensor cross-checking.     

Clinical Comparison of Acute Single to Dual Chamber Pacing in Chronotropically Incompetent Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Dual chamber, rate responsive (DDDR) pacing is felt to be superior to ventricular, rate responsive (VVIR) pacing since it more closely mimics the normal electrical and hemodynamic activity of the heart. This reasoning has been used to justify the higher initial costs and increased complexity of dual chamber systems. This study was designed to determine if objective criteria could be identified during acute testing to justify implanting a dual chamber instead of a single chamber system in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Eight patients with DDDR pacemakers (implanted for chronotropic incompetence) and left ventricular dysfunction underwent exercise radionuclide angiography and graded exercise treadmill testing. Each patient performed the tests in the single (VVIR) and dual (DDDR) chamber modes in a randomized, blinded fashion. We found that objective parameters such as ejection fraction (31%± 13% vs 31%± 10%), exercise tolerance (6.1 ± 2.7 min vs 6.3 ± 2.9 min), oxygen consumption (VO₂) (941 ± 286 mL/min vs 994 ± 314 mL/min), carbon dioxide production (VCO₂) (995 ± 332 mL/min vs 1054 ± 356 mL/min), and maximum attainable workload (43 ± 24 W vs 46 ± 22 W) did not differ between the single and dual chamber pacing modes. These findings suggest that in the acute setting, the additional cost and complexity of dual chamber, rate responsive pacing cannot be justified by objective improvements in exercise tolerance in patients with underlying left ventricular dysfunction.     

Comparative Evaluation of Rate Modulated Dual Chamber and VVIR Pacing

JUTZY, R.V., ET AL.: Comparative Evaluation of Rate Modulated Dual Chamber and VVIR Pacing. While dual chamber pacing is considered superior to VVI pacing at rest, there is a continuing debate as to the relative benefit of AV synchrony versus rate increase with exercise. To evaluate this question and to correlate different methods of evaluation, 14 patients with DDDR pacemakers were studied using serial treadmill exercise test with a CAEP protocol. Patients were exercised in DDD, DDDR, and VVIR modes. Echo-Doppler cardiac outputs were determined and pulmonary gas exchange was measured during exercise. There was a significant improvement in cardiac output with exercise in the DDDR versus VVIR modes, and in DDDR versus DDD modes in patients with chronotropic incompetence. There were small increases in exercise duration in DDDR versus VVIR modes, and small but consistent increases in VO, at all levels of exercise, though not statistically significant. In this group of patients, DDDR pacing was superior to VVIR pacing, and superior to DDD pacing when chronotropic incompetence was present.     

Quantitative Comparison of Rate Response and Oxygen Uptake Kinetics Between Different Sensor Modes in Multisensor Rate Adaptive Pacing

Although multisensor pacing may mitigate the inadequacy of rate adaptation in a single sensor system, the clinical role of multisensor driven rate adaptive pacing remains unclear. The cardiopulmonary performance of six patients (mean age 63.5 ± 10 years) who had undergone the implant of combined QT and activity VVIR (Topaz®) pacemakers was assessed during submaximal and maximal treadmill exercise with the rate response sensor randomly programmed to either single sensor mode. QT and activity (ACT), or dual sensor mode, with equal contribution of QT and ACT (QT = ACT). The rate of response, the proportionality, oxygen kinetics, and maximal exercise performance of the various sensor modes during exercise were measured and compared. The ACT sensor mode “overpaced” and the QT and QT = ACT sensor modes “underpaced” during the first three quartiles of exercise (P < 0.05). The ACT sensor mode also gave the fastest rate of response with the shortest delay (13 ± 1.5 sec vs 145 ± 58 sec and 41 ± 17 sec, P < 0.05), time to 50% rate response (39 ±2.7 sec vs 275 ± 48 sec and 203 ± 40 sec, P < 0.05), and time to 90% of rate response (107 ± 21 sec vs 375 ± 34 sec and 347 ± 34 sec, P < 0.05) and a smaller oxygen debt (0.87 ± 0.16 L vs 1.10 ± 0.2 L and 1.07 ± 0.18 L, P < 0.05) compared to the QTand QT = ACT sensor modes, respectively. These differences were most significant at low exercise workloads. Thus, different sensor combinations resuh in different rate response profiles and oxygen delivery, especially during low level exercise. However, the observed oxygen kinetics difference was workload dependent, and its clinical relevance remains to be tested. Despite the marked difference in exercise rate profile and oxygen kinetics, there was no difference in the maximal oxygen uptake, anaerobic threshold, and exercise duration between the various sensor modes during maximal exercise.     

Rate Modulated Pacing Based on Right Ventricular dP/dt: Quantitative Analysis of Chronotropic Response

Right ventricular contractility increases in response to catecholamine stimulation and greater ventricular preload, factors that increase with exercise workload. Thus, the maximum systolic dP/dt may be a potentially useful sensor to control the pacing rate of a permanent pacing system. The present study was designed to test the long-term performance of a permanent pacemaker that modulates pacing rate based on right ventricular dP/dt and to quantitatively analyze the chronotropic response characteristics of this sensor in a group of patients with widely varying structural heart diseases and degrees of hemodynamic impairment. A permanent pacing system incorporating a high fidelity pressure sensor in the lead for measurement of right ventricular dP/dt was implanted in 13 patients with atrial arrhythmias and AV block, including individuals with coronary artery disease, hypertension, severe obstructive pulmonary disease with prior pneumonectomy, atrial septal defect, dilated cardiomyopathy, restrictive cardiomyopathy, and mitral stenosis. Patients underwent paired treadmill exercise testing in the VVI and VVIR pacing modes with measurement of expired gas exchange and quantitative analysis of chronotropic response using the concept of metabolic reserve. The peak right ventricular dP/dt ranged from 238–891 mmHg/sec with a pulse pressure that ranged from 19–41 mmHg. There was a positive correlation between the right ventricular dP/dt and pulse pressure (r = 0.70, P = 0.012). The maximum pacing rate and VO_2max were 72 ± 6 beats/min and 12.61 ± 4.0 cc O₂/kg per minute during VVI pacing and increased to 124 ± 18 beats/min and 15.89 ± 5.9 cc 0₂/kg per minute in the VVIR pacing mode (P < 0.0003 and P < 0.002, respectively). The integrated area under the normalized rate response curve was 96.7 ± 45.7% of expected during exercise and 100.1 ± 43.4% of expected during recovery. One patient demonstrated an anomalous increase in pacing rate in response to a change in posture to the left lateral decubitus position. Thus, the peak positive right ventricular dP/dt is an effective rate control parameter for permanent pacing systems. The chronotropic response was proportional to metabolic workload during treadmill exercise in this study population with widely varying forms of structural heart disease.     

Quality-of-Life in DDDR Pacing: Atrioventricular Synchrony or Rate Adaptation?

Al though differences in exercise performance have been observed between different rate adaptive modes, the relative impact of atrioventricular (AV) synchrony and rate adaptation on quality of life (QOL) have not been determined. Thirty-three patients with either sinoatrial disease (18) or complete atrioventricular (AV) block (15) received DDDR pacemakers (16 minute ventilation sensing, 17 activity sensing). There were 11 males and 22 females, with a mean age of 66 ± 1 (range 39–78) years. The study was a double-blind, triple cross-over study comparing DDDR, DDD, and VVIR modes. At the end of each 8-week study period in each mode, QOL was assessed by a questionnaire evaluating patients' functional class (Classes I-IV), physical malaise inventory (41 items), illness perception (43 items), and overall QOL rating based on a 48 items measure covering different aspects of the patients' daily life adjustment. Two patients required early crossover from VVIR mode during the study. Patients experienced significantly fewer physi cal malaise such as temperature intolerance, dyspnea, and palpitations in the DDDR mode, compared with either DDD or VVIR pacing. DDDR pacing reduced the perception of illness in 5 of 43 items compared to VVIR pacing, and improved stamina and appetite compared to DDD pacing. The overall QOL score was 102 ± 2, 105 ± 2, 113 ± 2 in the DDDR, DDD, and VVIR modes, respectively, with a higher score indicating a poorer QOL (DDDR/DDD vs VVIR, P < 0.02). There was no change in functional classes between the three pacing modes. In conclusion, VVIR pacing has a lower QOL compared with DDD pacing, which can be further enhanced with rate augmentation.     

Improvement of exercise tolerance by single lead VDD pacemaker: evaluation using cardiopulmonary exercise test

We used a cardiopulmonary test to assess the physiological benefit of single lead VDD pacing in ten patients (six men, four women; aged 32-84 years, mean 69 years) with atrioventricular block. Maximal symptom-limited treadmill exercise test using a ramp protocol was performed under VDD and VVIR or VVI pacing (VVI) in random sequence. The pacemaker was then programmed to the VDD mode, and Holter ECG was recorded in nine patients. Compared with findings during the VVI, the VDD mode had a greater chronotropic response (mean maximal heart rate, VDD 106 +/- 17 beats/min vs VVI 79 +/- 19 beats/min, P = 0.03), and was associated with prolongation of exercise duration (VDD 11.2 +/- 2.9 minute vs VVI 10.5 +/- 3.1 minute; P = 0.01), and the onset of anaerobic threshold at a higher oxygen uptake (VDD 12.4 +/- 3.4 mL/min per kilogram vs VVI 10.0 +/- 2.1 mL/min per kilogram; P < 0.01). Atrial sensing was recognized in almost all normal sinus P waves for all cases examined using Holter ECG. Thus, chronotropic response during exercise by VDD pacemaker improved exercise tolerance, indicating that a VDD pacemaker might be useful for patients requiring physical activity.