Inhibition of thrombin generation by simvastatin and lack of additive effects of aspirin in patients with marked hypercholesterolemia

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of aspirin compared with simvastatin on thrombin generation in hypercholesterolemic men, and to establish whether the reduction of elevated blood cholesterol by simvastatin would affect the action of aspirin on thrombin formation. BACKGROUND: Aspirin inhibits thrombin formation, but its performance is blunted in hypercholesterolemia. By virtue of altering lipid profile, statins could be expected to influence thrombin generation. METHODS: Thirty-three men, aged 34 to 61 years, with minimal or no clinical symptoms, serum total cholesterol >6.5 mmol/liter and serum triglycerides <4.6 mmol/liter, completed the study consisting of three treatment phases. First, they received 300 mg of aspirin daily for two weeks (phase I), which was then replaced by simvastatin at the average dose of 24 mg/d for three months (phase II). In phase III, aspirin, 300 mg/day, was added for two weeks to simvastatin, the dose of which remained unchanged. Thrombin generation was assessed: 1) in vivo, by measuring levels of fibrinopeptide A (FPA) and prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2) in venous blood; and 2) ex vivo, by monitoring the rates of increase of FPA and F1+2 in blood emerging from standardized skin incisions of a forearm. A mathematical model was used to describe the kinetics of thrombin formation at the site of microvascular injury. RESULTS: Two-week treatment with aspirin had no effect on thrombin markers in vivo, while ex vivo it depressed the total amount of thrombin formed, though not the reaction rate. After simvastatin treatment, serum cholesterol decreased by 31% and LDL cholesterol by 42%, while thrombin generation became markedly depressed. In venous blood, FPA was significantly reduced. Concomitantly, the initial thrombin concentration and total amount of thrombin generated decreased significantly. Addition of aspirin to simvastatin (phase III) had no further effect on any of these parameters. CONCLUSIONS: In men with hypercholesterolemia, lowering serum cholesterol level by a three-month simvastatin treatment is accompanied by a marked reduction of thrombin generation both at basal conditions in venous blood and after activation of hemostasis by microvascular injury. Once blood cholesterol became reduced, adding aspirin to simvastatin did not enhance dampening of thrombin formation.     

Achievement of target plasma cholesterol levels in hypercholesterolaemic patients being treated in general practice

A total of 1028 hypercholesterolaemic men and women aged 18-75 participated in an open label, randomised, parallel group, 6-month treatment-to-target study conducted in 240 general practices throughout Australia. The study compared atorvastatin monotherapy with simvastatin monotherapy or, if necessary, with the combination of simvastatin and cholestyramine in terms of their abilities to achieve a plasma total cholesterol target of<5.0 mmol/l. The initial daily dose of each drug was 10 mg. If the target was not achieved, the dose was doubled at 6 week intervals to a maximum daily dose of 80 mg atorvastatin or 40 mg simvastatin, with the simvastatin supplemented if necessary with 4 g cholestyramine. The percentage of patients achieving the target at 10 and 20 mg doses of atorvastatin were comparable to 20 and 40 mg of simvastatin, respectively. Despite relatively high baseline levels of plasma total cholesterol (mean levels of 7.41 and 7.31 mmol/l in the atorvastatin and simvastatin groups, respectively) the majority of patients in each group achieved the plasma total cholesterol target of<5.0 mmol/l. Treatment with atorvastatin achieved the target in 83% of patients, while simvastatin (or simvastatin plus cholestyramine) achieved the target in 66% of the patients (P<0.005). The target was achieved with 10 mg atorvastatin in 38% of patients and with 10 mg simvastatin in 26% of cases (P<0.005). In patients whose baseline cholesterol levels were between 5.6 and 6.5 mmol/l, 95% of the atorvastatin group and 86% of the simvastatin group reached the target. Even with baseline cholesterol levels between 7.6 and 8.5 mmol/l, the target was reached in 78% of the atorvastatin group and 61% of the simvastatin group. It is thus realistic for general practitioners to expect the majority of their at risk patients to achieve target plasma cholesterol levels that have been shown in population studies to be associated with relatively low rates of coronary heart disease. These targets are achieved in significantly more patients and at lower mg doses with atorvastatin than simvastatin.     

Simvastatin in severe primary hypercholesterolemia: Efficacy,safety, and tolerability in 595 patients over 18 weeks

We report the results of an open multicenter study which evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of simvastatin in a large cohort of patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Against a background of standard dietary advice, the study enrolled 595 patients with total cholesterol ≥ 6.5 mmol/l and triglycerides < 6.0 mmol/l across 20 centers. After 4 weeks on placebo, treatment began with simvastatin 10 mg each night, titrating to 20 mg after 6 weeks, and then to 40 mg after 12 weeks if cholesterol levels still exceeded 5.5 mmol/l. By Week 18, 70% of patients were using 40 mg/day. After 18 weeks of treatment, the mean reductions (95% confidence interval) in total and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol were 30% (29-31%) and 38% (37-39%), respectively. There was a mean increase in high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol of 12% (10-13%), while triglycerides were reduced by a median 19% (16-23%). From a mean entry total cholesterol of 9.31 ± 2.15 mmol/l, 52% of patients achieved cholesterol levels ± 6.2 mmol/l on treatment. The changes noted were essentially independent of gender, age, or lipid phenotype (IIa vs. IIb). Compliance with prescribed medication was very good and the drug was well tolerated; only 3% of patients manifested a clinical adverse experience requiring discontinuation or a clinical adverse experience described as serious (associated with hospitalization or serious disability). Isolated laboratory adverse experience required discontinuation in 0.2% of patients. One in 3 patients manifested a clinical adverse experience and 1 in 10 a laboratory adverse experience. Adverse experiences occurred in the digestive system (10% of patients), nervous system/psychiatric (6%), skin/appendages (5%), musculoskeletal (4%), elevated muscle enzymes (5%), and elevated transaminases (2%). In the absence of a parallel control group, the proportion of the events attributable to simvastatin could not be ascertained. Simvastatin appears to be a well tolerated and highly efficacious drug for the management of severe primary hypercholesterolemia.     

急性冠脉综合征早期辛伐他汀治疗对血脂和炎症反应标记物的影响

目的　观察急性冠脉综合征 (ACS)早期辛伐他汀治疗对血脂和炎症反应标记物的影响及差异 ,探讨他汀类药物在ACS早期治疗中的作用。　方法　ACS住院患者 12 3例 ,入院后测定血浆甘油三酯 (TG)、总胆固醇(TC)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇 (LDL C)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇 (HDL C)、白细胞介素 6 (IL 6 )和C反应蛋白 (CRP)水平 ,然后随机分为辛伐他汀治疗组和非辛伐他汀治疗组。出院时重复测定上述指标。同期测定 15例慢性稳定性心绞痛 (CAP)患者和 15名健康者作对照比较。　结果　 1 ACS患者血浆TC、LDL C、IL 6、CRP显著高于健康者 (P <0 0 1) ,血浆LDL C、IL 6显著高于CAP患者 (P <0 0 1)。 2 出院与入院时比较 ,辛伐他汀组和非辛伐他汀组血浆IL 6、CRP显著降低 (P <0 0 1) ,出院时辛伐他汀组血浆IL 6、CRP也显著低于非辛伐他汀组 (P <0 0 1)。 3 据入院时血浆IL 6、CRP水平 ,把ACS患者分别分为IL 6、CRP高值组和低值组 ,出院与入院时比较 ,高值组和低值组血浆IL 6、CRP均显著降低 (P<0 0 1,P<0 0 1) ,但只有高值组 ,出院时辛伐他汀治疗者血浆IL 6、CRP显著低于非辛伐他汀治疗者 (P <0 0 1,P <0 0 5 )。　结论　ACS患者早期辛伐他汀治疗有明显抗炎症作用。     

Effects of simvastatin on C-reactive protein in mixed hyperlipidemic and hypertriglyceridemic patients

This study examined the effects of simvastatin on C-reactive protein (CRP) and other inflammatory markers in study subjects with significant elevations in triglyceride (TG) blood levels. CRP, vascular cellular adhesion molecule (VCAM), serum amyloid A (SAA), and interleukin 6 (IL-6) were measured in archived plasma samples from 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies designed to examine the lipid-altering efficacy of simvastatin in study subjects with elevated TGs. In the first study, 130 study subjects with mixed hyperlipidemia (low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol > or =130 mg/dl; TGs 300 to 700 mg/dl) received placebo or simvastatin 40 or 80 mg once daily for three 6-week periods in a complete-block crossover design. In the second study, 195 study subjects with hypertriglyceridemia (TGs 300 to 900 mg/dl) received daily doses of placebo or simvastatin 20, 40, or 80 mg for 6 weeks. Significant but weak correlations were observed between baseline CRP values and baseline levels of LDL cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, but not with TGs. CRP was also correlated with body mass index and fasting levels of glucose and insulin. Treatment with simvastatin 20, 40, and 80 mg led to significant reductions in CRP plasma levels versus placebo (p <0.05). Although CRP change was weakly correlated with changes in LDL cholesterol, TGs, and HDL cholesterol, results of regression analyses showed that only baseline CRP and treatment allocation were significant predictors of CRP response after 6 weeks of study drug administration. Simvastatin had no effect on VCAM, SAA, or IL-6. In summary, simvastatin significantly reduced CRP in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia and hypertriglyceridemia.     

Effects of simvastatin and atorvastatin on inflammation markers in plasma

OBJECTIVES: To study the effect of statins on plasma markers for inflammation. DESIGN: Patients with hypercholesterolemia were randomized in one of the following treatments: Simvastatin (S) + placebo: S 40 mg for 6 weeks - S 80 mg for 6 weeks - S 80 mg for 24 weeks and Atorvastatin (A) + placebo: A 20 mg for 6 weeks - A 40 mg for 6 weeks - A 80 mg for 24 weeks. SUBJECTS: Forty-seven patients with hypercholesterolemia were recruited in four different outpatient clinics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Samples were obtained at randomization after 6, 12 and 36 weeks. Plasma or serum was analysed for lipids and for inflammation markers: C-reactive protein (CRP), serum amyloid A (SAA), soluble phospholipase A2 (SPLA2), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). RESULTS: The reduction in LDL was similar for the two statins, except at the highest dose of atorvastatin (41 vs. 47%). The increase in HDL tended to be more pronounced in the simvastatin group, significantly so on the highest dose of atorvastatin (P < 0.05). CRP and SAA was significantly reduced by atorvastatin, whilst no reduction was seen for simvastatin. There was a significant difference in treatment effects between the two statins. Both statins caused a reduction in SPLA2. For IL-6 and ICAM-1 only small and inconsistent reductions were observed for both statins. CONCLUSION: Atorvastatin reduced the liver-derived acute-phase reactants, CRP and SAA, whilst the effect of simvastatin was small or absent. Small and inconsistent effects were seen for both statins on plasma levels of IL-6 and ICAM-1.     

辛伐他汀对正常血脂水平急性冠状动脉综合征患者早期炎症因子的干预观察

目的观察正常血脂水平急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者早期白介素-6(IL-6)和高敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)水平变化及辛伐他汀早期治疗对其干预效果。方法将血脂水平正常的 ACS患者随机分为辛代他汀治疗组(20 mg/d×4周)和常规治疗对照组(各40例),另选择同期健康对照者40例作为健康对照组。分析比较组间及两组ACS患者治疗前后血清IL-6和hs-CRP水平变化。结果两组ACS患者血脂水平与健康对照组比较无显著性差别,但其IL-6和hs—CRP水平均显著高于健康对照组(P<0．01);辛伐他汀治疗2周时血脂水平无显著变化,但IL-6和hs—CPP水平显著降低(P<0．01),治疗4周时血清总胆固醇和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇及IL-6、hs-CRP水平均显著降低 (P<0．05,P<0．01)且显著低于常规对照组(P<0．05)。结论血脂水平正常的ACS患者同样存在明显的炎症反应,辛伐他汀具有独立于调脂的抗炎作用,其快速抗炎作用在ACS患者早期治疗中可能具有重要意义。     

Comparison of effects of ezetimibe/simvastatin versus simvastatin versus atorvastatin in reducing C-reactive protein and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels

The lowering effects of ezetimibe/simvastatin combination therapy on low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) were compared with those of simvastatin or atorvastatin monotherapy in a large cohort of patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. To compare ezetimibe/simvastatin with simvastatin, data were combined from 3 identical, prospective 12-week trials in which patients were randomized to receive placebo; ezetimibe 10 mg; ezetimibe 10 mg added to simvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg; or simvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg. To compare ezetimibe/simvastatin with atorvastatin, data were analyzed from a phase III double-blind, active-controlled study in which patients were randomized equally to receive ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/10, 10/20, 10/40, or 10/80 mg or atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg for 6 weeks. When averaged across doses, ezetimibe/simvastatin produced significantly greater reductions compared with simvastatin alone in LDL cholesterol (52.5% vs 38.0%, respectively) and CRP levels (31.0% vs 14.3%, respectively). At each individual simvastatin dose, co-administration with ezetimibe produced significant further CRP reductions versus simvastatin alone. Ezetimibe/simvastatin was significantly more effective at lowering LDL cholesterol than atorvastatin when pooled across doses (53.4% vs 45.3%, respectively) and in each milligram-equivalent dose comparison. Reductions in CRP of similar magnitude were observed with ezetimibe/simvastatin and atorvastatin when averaged across doses and at each milligram-equivalent statin dose comparison. In conclusion, the lipid-modulating and anti-inflammatory effects of ezetimibe/simvastatin provide additional benefits not realized by statin monotherapy alone.     

Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of simvastatin and atorvastatin in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia

BACKGROUND: Simvastatin and atorvastatin are effective statins for treating hypercholesterolemia. HYPOTHESIS: The study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and tolerability of simvastatin 20 and 40 mg/day and atorvastatin 10 and 20 mg/day. METHODS: In this multinational, open-label, crossover study, 258 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia were randomized after 4 weeks of diet plus placebo to once-daily administration of a starting dose sequence of simvastatin (20 mg) or atorvastatin (10 mg), or a higher dose sequence of simvastatin (40 mg) or atorvastatin (20 mg) for 6 weeks. Patients were then switched after a 1-week washout to the corresponding starting or higher dose of the alternate drug for a second 6-week period. The primary endpoint was the mean percent change from baseline to Week 6 in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol; percent changes from baseline in total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and apolipoprotein B were also compared. Safety was assessed through adverse experiences and laboratory measurements. RESULTS: Both statins produced statistically significant improvements in all measured plasma lipids and lipoproteins. The main treatment comparison showed no statistically significant difference in changes in LDL cholesterol and triglycerides, whereby the overall effects were comparable when doses of 20 mg and 40 mg of simvastatin were compared with atorvastatin 10 mg and 20 mg. The mean percent reductions for LDL cholesterol from baseline to Week 6 ranged from 35-42% for the entire study cohort. An LDL cholesterol level < or = 130 mg/dl (3.4 mmol/l) was achieved in approximately 70% of patients treated with both drugs in this study. Simvastatin and atorvastatin were well tolerated at the doses studied. CONCLUSION: In patients with hypercholesterolemia, the most commonly used doses of simvastatin and atorvastatin produced similar changes in LDL cholesterol and achieved an LDL cholesterol level < or = 130 mg/dl (3.4 mmol/l) in a similar number of patients. Both statins were well tolerated.     

Comparison of the efficacy of simvastatin and standard fibrate therapy in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia and combined hyperlipidemia

Five multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies were conducted in France to compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily simvastatin treatment (10–40 mg/day) with conventional therapy with gemfibrozil 900 mg/day, ciprofibrate 100 mg/day, bezafibrate 400 mg/day, and fenofibrate 300 or 400 mg/day in a total of 800 patients with hypercholesterolemia. Simvastatin was associated with statistically significantly greater (p ? 0.01) mean percent reductions in plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol compared with each of the five fibrate regimens, even when administered at its recommended starting dose of 10 mg/day. Furthermore, approximately 90% of patients treated once daily with simvastatin experienced an at least 20% decrease in plasma LDL cholesterol compared with only 36 to 68% of patients treated with the individual fibrate agents (p ? 0.05). The effectiveness of simvastatin in reducing LDL cholesterol did not differ as a function of the baseline plasma concentrations of total cholesterol or triglycerides. In contrast, the effectiveness of fibrate therapy in lowering plasma LDL cholesterol levels was significantly diminished (p ? 0.05) among patients with triglyceride concentrations > 1.7 mmol/1. Plasma highdensity lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels were increased by approximately 10% after treatment with simvastatin or the fibrates. Although fibrate therapy was more effective overall in lowering plasma triglyceride levels, the effectiveness of simvastatin in reducing plasma triglyceride levels was generally 2- to 4-fold greater in patients with hypercholesterolemia associated with triglyceride levels ? 2.3 mmol/1 than in those with hypercholesterolemia associated with triglyceride levels < 2.3 mmol/1. The results of these studies confirm the superiority of simvastatin to standard fibrate therapy in reducing plasma levels of total and LDL cholesterol. They further indicate that once-daily treatment with simvastatin is effective in patients with isolated hypercholesterolemia or hypercholesterolemia associated with elevated triglyceride levels.     

Simvastatin inhibits interleukin-6 release in human monocytes stimulated by C-reactive protein and lipopolysaccharide

BACKGROUND: The accumulating evidence suggests that C-reactive protein (CRP) may have direct inflammatory effects on the vascular wall and that statin therapy may have important non-lipid anti-inflammatory effects confirmed by decreasing serum inflammatory markers, such as CRP. However, the effect of simvastatin on interleukin-6 (IL-6) release in cultured human monocytes was not investigated.DESIGN A prospective, human monocyte culture, simvastatin intervention study. METHODS: Monocytes were isolated from blood of healthy volunteers by the Ficoll density gradient and stimulated by broad concentrations of CRP (1-20 microg/ml) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 1-10 ng/ml) at indicated time points (0, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 h). Also 10-8-10-6 mol/l simvastatin was coincubated with cells in the presence of CRP and LPS. Measurements of IL-6 were performed from supernatants of cultured medium in duplicate, using a commercial assay kit. RESULTS: CRP and LPS induced the rapid release of IL-6, with significantly elevated levels in cultured supernatants at 4 h in the CRP group and at 2 h in the LPS group. The effects of CRP and LPS on IL-6 release of monocytes were dose and time dependent. A greater than 11-fold increase of IL-6 in the CRP group (20 microg/ml) and a greater than 26-fold increase in the LPS group (10 ng/ml) were observed at 24 h compared with the control group (945.7+/-98.3 pg/ml compared with 94.3+/-12.4 pg/ml and 1720.4+/-690.1 pg/ml compared with 70.1+/-16.7 pg/ml, P<0.001, respectively). However, 10-8-10-6 mol/l simvastatin inhibited significantly the production of IL-6 in monocytes stimulated by CRP and LPS in a dose-dependent manner, with the maximal inhibiting effect at a concentration of 10-6 mol/l (945.7+/-98.3 pg/ml compared with 180.9+/-31.2 pg/ml and 1720.4+/-690.1 pg/ml compared with 824.0+/-206.2 pg/ml, P<0.001 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: CRP and LPS could induce IL-6 release in human monocytes and simvastatin could inhibit this response in a dose-dependent manner, which may provide an insight into the mechanisms of anti-inflammatory or anti-atherosclerotic actions of simvastatin.     

Effect of statin therapy on dynamics of vascular endothelial growth factor and fibroblast growth factor in patients with ischemic heart disease

The aim of our study was to assess the influence of rosuvastatin on coronary angiogenesis. 30 male patients with chronic coronary heart disease and total cholesterol level > 5.2 mmol/l were treated with rosuvastatin 10 mg daily during 3 months. The serum level of total cholesterol (TC), LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C), HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (TG) as well as C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) were measured initially and in 3 months. There was the significant decreasing of TC, LDL-C and TG concentrations. IL-6 and CRP serum levels were also decreased after rosuvastatin therapy. Three months of treatment resulted to significant decrease of VEGF with no changes of bFGF levels. The correlation was not found between CRP and VEGF levels and between IL-6 and VEGF levels. Also there was no correlation between the degree of decreasing CRP and VEGF, and IL-6 and VEGF. So we have shown significant decreasing of VEGF serum levels on rosuvastatin therapy. It could be possible mechanism of plaque stabilization in patients with coronary heart disease.     

Rapid effects of simvastatin on lipid profile and C-reactive protein in patients with hypercholesterolemia

BACKGROUND: Rapid lowering of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels as well as C-reactive protein (CRP) by administration of drugs may produce early benefit to the coronary endothelium in patients with coronary heart disease and reduce angina and coronary events after revascularization. Limited information has been available in evaluating a potentially effective first 2-week therapeutic approach for the treatment of patients with hypercholesterolemia using a statin. HYPOTHESIS: The study was undertaken to investigate whether a rapid LDL cholesterol and CRP reduction can be achieved by 2-week simvastatin therapy using a common lipid-lowering protocol in patients with hypercholesterolemia. METHODS: Forty-two patients were randomly assigned to 20 or 40 mg/day of simvastatin. Blood samples were drawn at Day 0 and at Day 14 for measuring lipid profile, CRP levels, and hepatic enzymes in all patients. RESULTS: The results showed that both doses of simvastatin (20 and 40 mg) induced significant reductions in total cholesterol (TC, 25 and 38%) and LDL cholesterol (31 and 46%) compared with baseline. However, the highest dose of simvastatin (40 mg) resulted in significantly greater reductions in TC and LDL cholesterol (p = 0.04, p = 0.02, respectively) compared with the group receiving 20 mg (p < 0.04, p < 0.02, respectively). A less significant reduction was observed in mean triglycerides (TG) level (16 and 25%) compared with TC and LDL cholesterol. There was no significant difference in mean high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels compared with baseline in either group. In addition, both doses of simvastatin induced significant reductions in mean CRP levels on Day 14 (22.3 and 23.1%) in a non dose-dependent manner (p < 0.001, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that a common daily dose of simvastatin, especially 40 mg, is an effective 2-week therapy for patients with hypercholesterolemia, and benefit to the vascular endothelium can be derived quickly by reduction of CRP levels.     

Ezetimibe and simvastatin reduce inflammation, disease activity, and aortic stiffness and improve endothelial function in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of simvastatin and ezetimibe on inflammation, disease activity, endothelial dysfunction, and arterial stiffness in a cohort of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory condition associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Statins reduce inflammation and disease activity in RA patients, but whether this is due to pleiotropism or cholesterol lowering per se is unclear. METHODS: Twenty patients received 20 mg simvastatin or 10 mg ezetimibe each for 6 weeks in a randomized double-blind crossover study. Disease activity, blood pressure, aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV), brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD), and serum inflammatory markers were measured before and after each treatment. RESULTS: Both ezetimibe and simvastatin significantly reduced total cholesterol (-0.62 +/- 0.55 mmol/l and -1.28 +/- 0.49 mmol/l, respectively; p < 0.001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-0.55 +/- 0.55 mmol/l and -1.28 +/- 0.49 mmol/l; p < 0.0001), and C-reactive protein (-5.35 +/- 9.25 mg/l and -5.05 +/- 6.30 mg/l; p < 0.001). Concomitantly, Disease Activity Score (-0.55 +/- 1.01 and -0.67 +/- 0.91; p = 0.002), aortic PWV (-0.69 +/- 1.15 m/s and -0.71 +/- 0.71 m/s; p = 0.001), and FMD (1.37 +/- 1.17% and 2.51 +/- 2.13%; p = 0.001) were significantly improved by both drugs. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that both ezetimibe and simvastatin reduce disease activity and inflammatory markers to a similar extent in patients with RA. Therapy is also associated with a concomitant reduction in aortic PWV and improvement in endothelial function. This suggests that cholesterol lowering per se has anti-inflammatory effects and improves vascular function in RA.     

Low-dose simvastatin for the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia in recipients of cardiac transplantation.

There is increasing evidence that hypercholesterolaemia is an important contributor to the development of accelerated coronary arterial disease in the cardiac allograft. The optimal drug therapy of hypercholesterolaemia in recipients after cardiac transplantation, however, has not been defined. Simvastatin (an inhibitor of hydroxy-methyl glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase), at a dose of 10 mg/day, was administered to 12 recipients with serum total cholesterol greater than or equal to 7.8 mmol/l and serum triglyceride less than or equal to 4.5 mmol/l refractory to dietary measures during a follow-up period of 1-5 years after cardiac transplantation. All patients received maintenance doses of cyclosporin A and, in some instances, azathioprine and prednisolone. After 2 months treatment with simvastatin, serum total cholesterol was significantly reduced from 8.8 +/- 0.3 mmol/l (mean +/- SEM) to 5.5 +/- 0.5 mmol/l, P less than 0.001, low density cholesterol from 6.6 +/- 0.4 to 3.8 +/- 0.3 mmol/l, P less than 0.001 and triglycerides from 2.4 +/- 0.2 mmol/l to 1.8 +/- 0.2 mmol/l, P less than 0.005. These changes were maintained after a period of treatment of 8 months. Serum high density cholesterol, hepatic transaminase levels, serum creatinine, creatine kinase and cyclosporin A blood levels were not altered by treatment with simvastatin. It is concluded that, in this study group, low-dose simvastatin appears to be well tolerated and has favourable lipid modifying properties.     

Effects of Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and statin treatment on inflammatory markers and endothelial functions in patients with longterm rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and statins (hydroxy-methyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors) on inflammatory markers and endothelial functions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A total of 45 patients with longterm RA were randomized into 3 groups to receive 8 weeks of treatment with placebo (n = 15), simvastatin (20 mg/day, n = 15), or quinapril (10 mg/day, n = 15) as an adjunct to existing antirheumatic drug treatment. Factors with a role in the development of endothelial dysfunction, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, nitric oxide (NO), and serum cytokine concentrations including interleukin 1beta (IL-1beta), IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) were measured at baseline and in the posttreatment period. Brachial artery vasodilator responses were assessed by high resolution ultrasound to evaluate endothelial functions. RESULTS: Simvastatin treatment significantly decreased serum CRP and TNF-a [from 14 +/- 6 to 7 +/- 3 mg/l (p = 0.025) and 30 +/- 5 to 16 +/- 4 pg/ml (p = 0.012), respectively], while quinapril had no significant changes in these 2 measures. IL-1beta and IL-6 showed insignificant changes in patients in the 2 drug groups. Endothelium-dependent vasodilatation was improved significantly in the simvastatin group [from 5.3 +/- 1.1% to 8.9 +/- 1.4% (p = 0.025)], while there was no difference in endothelium-independent vasodilatation [9.0 +/- 1.8% to 11.2 +/- 2.5% (p = 0.17)]. The quinapril group showed no significant changes in both types of vasodilation although there was a tendency to an increase in endothelium-dependent vasodilatation [from 6.1 +/- 0.8% to 7.8 +/- 0.7% (p = 0.06)]. Treatment with the 2 drugs had no significant effects on resting arterial diameter. CONCLUSION: We show that simvastatin 20 mg daily improves endothelial function in patients with RA. Its beneficial effect may be attributed to lowering CRP and TNF-alpha concentrations. ACE inhibition with daily 10 mg quinapril was found to have no significant effects on inflammatory markers and endothelial vasodilator response.     

Effects of simvastatin on carotenoid status in plasma

Background and aims

Carotenoids are potent antioxidants mainly transported in the low density lipoprotein (LDL) fraction. They may also influence the immune response and inverse associations with inflammatory markers have been reported. We investigated whether simvastatin, by exerting both lipid-lowering and anti-inflammatory effects, altered the carotenoid status in plasma.

Methods and results

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study design was applied. Eighty volunteers with mild to moderate hypercholesterolemia received either simvastatin 40 mg or placebo for 6 weeks. Lipids, oxidized LDL (ox-LDL), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin (IL)-6, oxygenated carotenoids (lutein, zeaxanthin, β-cryptoxanthin) and hydrocarbon carotenoids (α-carotene, β-carotene, lycopene) were measured in plasma. Simvastatin use was associated with significant reductions in total cholesterol, LDL, ox-LDL and CRP. Simvastatin therapy also resulted in reduced plasma levels of both oxygenated and hydrocarbon carotenoids. However, when adjusted for lipids, all carotenoids except β-cryptoxanthin showed significant increases after simvastatin therapy. Both crude and lipid-adjusted carotenoids were inversely correlated with CRP and IL-6 in plasma but the change in carotenoid status during simvastatin therapy was not specifically related to any changes in inflammatory markers.

Conclusions

To summarize, the change in carotenoid status during simvastatin therapy was mainly attributed to the lowering of cholesterol and not to the suppression of inflammatory activity. After adjustment for lipids, the levels of lutein, lycopene, α-carotene and β-carotene were significantly increased by simvastatin suggesting an increased ratio of carotenoids per particle.     

Simvastatin inhibits the monocyte expression of proinflammatory cytokines in patients with hypercholesterolemia

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess if simvastatin has an anti-inflammatory activity in patients with hypercholesterolemia. BACKGROUND: Simvastatin, an inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-methyl-glutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, reduced cardiovascular events in patients with myocardial infarction and hypercholesterolemia. METHODS: Sixteen patients with polygenic hypercholesterolemia were randomly allocated to diet (n = 8) or diet plus 20 mg/day simvastatin (n = 8) for eight weeks. Before and at the end of treatment period, lipid profile and monocyte expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF) and interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta) were measured. RESULTS: At baseline no difference in lipid profile and monocyte expression of TNF and IL-1beta were observed between the two groups. In patients allocated to diet alone, no change in lipid profile and monocyte expression of TNF and IL-1beta was seen. In patients with diet plus simvastatin, significant decreases of total cholesterol (-27%, p<0.02), low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (-33%, p<0.02), and monocyte expression of TNF (-49%, p<0.02) and IL-1beta (-35%, p<0.02) were observed. At the end of treatment period, patients treated with simvastatin had lower cholesterol and monocyte TNF and IL-1beta than did patients assigned to diet alone. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that simvastatin possesses anti-inflammatory activity via the inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF and IL-1beta expressed by monocytes.     

Reduced levels of TNF alpha in hypercholesterolemic individuals after treatment with pravastatin for 8 weeks

BACKGROUND: cellular adhesion molecules (CAMs) expressed on the endothelial surface play a key role in the inflammatory process of atherosclerosis, and increased expression of CAMs has been shown in hypercholesterolemic individuals. The expression of CAMs is mediated by several cytokines including tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha) and interleukin 6 (IL-6). The aim of the present study was to assess the influence of pravastatin 40 mg per day on selected soluble CAMs; intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), vascular cellular adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1), E-selectin, P-selectin and some circulating markers of inflammation; C-reactive protein (CRP) and the cytokines TNF alpha and IL-6. 40 non-diabetic men, age below 70 years, with serum total cholesterol 6--10 mmol/l combined with HDL-cholesterol < or =1.2 mmol/l were included. The study was randomized, double blinded, placebo controlled, cross over designed with 8 weeks intervention periods. Fasting blood samples were drawn after 8 and 16 weeks. RESULTS (MEDIAN VALUES): significant reduction of total cholesterol was achieved after treatment with pravastatin (7.8 on placebo vs. 5.7 mmol/l on pravastatin). TNF alpha was significantly reduced after treatment with pravastatin (1.33 on placebo vs. 1.10 pg/ml on pravastatin, P=0.032), whereas no differences in the levels of the measured sCAMs, CRP and IL-6 were found. Subgroup analysis among smokers versus non-smokers showed a significant reduction in the level of TNF alpha only among the smokers. CONCLUSION: hypercholesterolemic individuals treated with pravastatin 40 mg per day for 8 weeks showed a statistically significant reduction in the levels of TNF alpha as compared with placebo.     

Effects of simvastatin on human T cells in vivo

OBJECTIVE: The use of statins has shown several anti-inflammatory actions, including modulatory effects on T cells in vitro. Since the effects on human T cells in vivo are less clarified, our aim was to investigate the effects of simvastatin on human T cells in vivo and ex vivo. METHODS AND RESULTS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study design was applied. Eighty volunteers with mild to moderate hypercholesterolemia received either simvastatin 40 mg or placebo for 6 weeks. The serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) were significantly reduced by simvastatin. The proportions of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets expressing early (CD25) or late (HLA-DR) activation markers, as assessed by flow cytometry, were not changed by simvastatin. However, simvastatin tended to increase the density of HLA-DR and L-selectin per CD8+ T cell. The T helper(h)1/Th2 response was evaluated by stimulatory assays followed by intra-cellular staining of interferon-gamma and interleukin-4. Simvastatin treatment did not affect the Th1 response but the results indicated a potential to suppress Th2. CONCLUSION: Simvastatin treatment resulted in a few discrete changes as regards peripheral T cells. However, the findings do not provide evidence that simvastatin-induced anti-inflammatory actions are related to any significant modulatory effects on human T cells in clinically healthy men with hypercholesterolemia.