Distinction of endometrial stromal sarcomas from 'hemangiopericytomatous' tumors using a panel of immunohistochemical stains.

Endometrial stromal sarcomas are low-grade malignant tumors that may pose a diagnostic challenge, especially when they are present in an extrauterine site. Owing to the presence of an arborizing vasculature and cells with an undifferentiated appearance, endometrial stromal sarcomas can be confused with several soft-tissue neoplasms. We studied 17 endometrial stromal sarcomas, eight hemangiopericytomas, 14 solitary fibrous tumors, and 16 synovial sarcomas immunohistochemically, detecting the following antigens: CD10, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, bcl-2, CD34, smooth muscle antigen, epithelial membrane antigen and cytokeratin (AE1/AE3). Most endometrial stromal sarcomas stained positively for CD10 (16/17), estrogen receptor (17/17), progesterone receptor (15/17), and bcl-2 (17/17). Staining with antismooth muscle antigen was seen in 11 of 17 cases of endometrial stromal sarcoma, with more intense staining seen in areas showing smooth muscle differentiation. Staining with AE1/3 was seen in four of 17 endometrial stromal sarcomas, with two of the positive cases containing epithelioid cells. None of the endometrial stromal sarcomas expressed epithelial membrane antigen or CD34. More than half of the hemangiopericytomas (4/8) and solitary fibrous tumors (9/14) cases demonstrated CD10 expression either focally or in a patchy cytoplasmic and membranous pattern. Hemangiopericytomas, solitary fibrous tumors, and synovial sarcomas did not express estrogen receptor. Four of eight hemangiopericytomas and seven of 14 solitary fibrous tumors also showed patchy progesterone receptor expression. CD34 expression was identified in six of eight hemangiopericytomas and 13 of 14 solitary fibrous tumors, but we did not find expression of CD34 in synovial sarcoma. Differences between endometrial stromal sarcoma and other soft-tissue tumors were detected for all of the immunohistochemical markers (P<0.05), except anti-bcl-2 and AE1/3. Antibodies against CD10 mark a substantial number of hemangiopericytomas and solitary fibrous tumors (albeit not diffusely) and should always be combined with antiestrogen receptor and CD34 when the differential diagnosis includes endometrial stromal sarcoma. Unlike estrogen receptor antibodies, progesterone receptor antibodies show at least focal nuclear staining in most hemangiopericytomas, solitary fibrous tumors and rare synovial sarcomas, and are not useful for this differential diagnosis. All endometrial stromal sarcomas expressed bcl-2, mostly in a diffuse pattern, but this did not distinguish between endometrial stromal sarcoma and mimics. We therefore recommend the use of a small antibody panel comprising anti-CD10, anti-estrogen receptor, and anti-CD34 to distinguish endometrial stromal sarcomas from tumors with a predominant hemangiopericytomatous growth pattern.     

Endometrial stromal tumors: an update on a group of tumors with a protean phenotype

Endometrial stromal tumors are reviewed with emphasis on their wide morphologic spectrum and problems in differential diagnosis, highlighting issues that have received particular attention in the recent literature. These neoplasms are divided into two major categories--endometrial stromal nodules and endometrial stromal sarcomas--a distinction made on the basis of the lack of significant infiltration at the periphery of the former. The division of endometrial stromal sarcomas into low-grade and high-grade categories has fallen out of favor and the designation endometrial stromal sarcoma is now considered best restricted to neoplasms that were formally referred to as "low-grade" stromal sarcoma. Endometrial sarcomas without recognizable evidence of a definite endometrial stromal phenotype, designated poorly differentiated "endometrial sarcomas," are almost invariably high grade and often resemble the mesenchymal component of a malignant mullerian mixed tumor. Two features of endometrial stromal tumors that may cause confusion are smooth muscle differentiation and epithelial patterns. Cases in the former category often have a characteristic "starburst" pattern of collagen formation. The most common epithelial patterns resemble those seen in ovarian sex-cord stromal tumors. Much less common is endometrioid gland differentiation. Some endometrial stromal tumors have a prominent fibrous or myxoid appearance and the myxoid tumors should be distinguished from myxoid leiomyosarcoma. Other unusual features of endometrial stromal tumors are also discussed. Lesions in the differential diagnosis of uterine endometrial stromal neoplasms include highly cellular leiomyoma, cellular intravenous leiomyomatosis, adenomyosis with sparse glands, metastatic carcinoma, and lymphoma. Endometrial stromal sarcomas at extrauterine sites may be primary or metastatic from a uterine tumor, the latter sometimes being occult and difficult to definitively establish, particularly if there is a history of a remote hysterectomy for "leiomyomas." Endometrial stromal sarcomas of the ovary, whether primary or metastatic, may be difficult to distinguish from ovarian sex-cord stromal tumors. Extragenital endometrial stromal sarcomas may be confused with diverse lesions such as gastrointestinal stromal tumors, hemangiopericytoma, lymphangiomyomatosis, or mesenchymal cystic hamartoma of the lung. Immunohistochemistry may play a role in evaluating these tumors and in some instances establishing the diagnosis although conventional light microscopic analysis suffices in the majority of cases. The unusual tumor, the "uterine tumor resembling an ovarian sex-cord tumor," is also considered in this review as it is almost certainly of endometrial stromal derivation in many cases. These neoplasms may have a striking resemblance to granulosa cell tumors or Sertoli cell tumors, including those with a retiform pattern, and have recently been shown to be frequently inhibin positive.     

Uterine tumour resembling an ovarian sex cord tumour

Endometrial stromal sarcomas account for 0.25% of all uterine malignancies. These tumours were originally divided into low grade and high grade stromal sarcomas, but the recent World Health Organisation classification (2003) recognises low grade stromal sarcoma and undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma. Low grade sarcomas may exhibit other forms of differentiation, including smooth muscle and sex cord differentiation. In the latter form, the tumour contains epithelial-like or sex cord-like elements often with epithelioid appearance, arranged in nests, cords, trabeculae, solid, or tubular structures. If this element predominates, the tumour is considered to be a uterine tumour resembling ovarian sex cord tumour, and may cause diagnostic difficulties. This case report describes the histological and immunohistochemical features of a uterine stromal sarcoma showing exclusively a pattern reminiscent of ovarian sex cord tumour.     

Myxoid mixed low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and smooth muscle tumor of the uterus. Case report

We report the case of a 73-year-old female with myxoid mixed low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and smooth muscle tumor of the uterus. Grossly, the tumor sized 130 x 130 x 100 mm involved the uterine corpus almost in its entirety. Histologically, the tumor consisted of two cell types. In some areas, the tumor cells showed typical features of endometrial stromal tumors and resembled stromal cells of proliferative endometrium. In other areas, however, the tumor showed smooth muscle features and consisted of larger mostly epitheloid cells with a moderate amount of cytoplasm. In all areas, myxoid changes and multiple hyalinizing giant rosettes were present. The tumor infiltrated the myometrium in a pattern typical of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells showed expression of vimentin, estrogen and progesterone receptors and variable expression of CD10, α-smooth muscle actin, desmin, h-caldesmon, and cytokeratin AE1/AE3. Other markers examined including CD99, α-inhibin, cytokeratin CAM5.2, S-100 protein, and HMB45 were negative. To the best of our knowledge, mixed low-grade endometrial stromal and smooth muscle tumor with myxoid changes has not been described to date.     

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma with an extensive epithelial-like element

A case of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma with extensive epithelial-like element (ELE) is reported. This tumor was composed of classical endometrial stromal sarcoma (CESS) showing diffuse proliferation, and ELE occupying approximately 72% of the tumor mass. On immunohistochemistry, ELE was negative for sex-cord differentiation markers, and was positive for myogenic markers used in our investigation, and had a particularly prominent positivity for alpha-smooth muscle actin within the ELE. Therefore, it was considered that ELE showed no true sex cord feature, but smooth muscle differentiation. Moreover, ELE was also positive for CD10, suggesting that it was derived from CESS. It has been reported that there is a distinct clinical behavior between endometrial stromal tumors with abundant ELE and those with limited ELE. In the present case, the Ki-67 labeling index was markedly higher in CESS than in ELE. Therefore, a difference in cell proliferative activity between ELE and CESS might underlie a different clinical prognosis.     

Sarcomas of the uterus: immunohistochemical characterization and diagnosis]

Pathologic findings and immunohistochemical characterizations of 18 cases of uterine sarcomas were studied. In endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS), 5 out of 10 cases had ovarian sex cord-like pattern and 4 out of 10 cases had smooth muscle differentiation. Immunohistochemical findings showed vimentin, desmin and cytokeratin positive in 9/10, 6/10, 2/10 cases respectively which reflects that ESS may differentiate into both epithelium and muscle components morphologically. In malignant mixed Mullerian tumors (MMT), its carcinomatous structure may be positive about vimentin, and its sarcomatous structure may be positive to the epithelium markers, which indicates that both the sarcoma and carcinoma structures have possibly a common origin. It is considered to be of value for the diagnosis of MMT, if the tumor has differentiated both epithelium and mesoderm components or to be positive to myoglobin, NSE* in immunoreaction, accompanying with the morphologic characterizations of the tumor.     

Role of Electron Microscopy in Metastatic Endometrial Stromal Tumors

Endometrial stromal tumors may pose a problem in diagnosis when they appear as metastatic lesions without a known primary tumor. To determine the usefulness of electron microscopy in identifying them in these situations, optimally fixed low-grade stromal sarcomas (five), normal endometrial specimens (six), and malignant mesodermal mixed tumors (four) were studied. The endometrial stromal sarcomas had a general resemblance to normal proliferative endometrial stroma, being composed of undifferentiated cells, fibroblasts, and myofibroblasts. One stromal tumor showed evidence of partial epithelial differentiation. One of the four malignant mesodermal mixed tumors had a fibrosarcomalike component, but there was insufficient resemblance to normal endometrial stroma to indicate a relationship between the two. Together with a review of the literature, this study indicates that electron microscopy is useful in the diagnosis of low-grade endometrial stromal tumors by demonstrating characteristic cellular findings as well as a lack of features specific for other round cell and spindle cell neoplasms.     

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma with intracardiac extension. Evolution of extensive smooth muscle differentiation and usefulness of immunohistochemistry for its recognition and distinction from intravenous leiomyomatosis.

This case, a rare example of low-grade endometrial stroma sarcoma with extensive smooth muscle differentiation which extended to the inferior vena cava and cardiac chambers closely resembling intravenous leiomyomatosis grossly and microscopically, illustrates the importance of extensive sectioning and the usefulness of immunohistochemistry. Although spindle cell components arranged in interlacing bundles consistent with smooth muscle differentiation were recognizable in the primary tumor (on retrospective review), extensive smooth muscle differentiation in the recurrent tumors masked prototypical morphologic features of stromal sarcoma and only small neoplastic stromal components were preserved in limited areas, leading to initial failure to distinguish the lesion from intravenous leiomyomatosis. The immunophenotyping disclosed two distinct cell populations in the tumor: i.e. vimentin-positive and smooth muscle marker negative stromal cells, and vimentin-negative spindle-shaped desmin-positive smooth muscle cells. Our observation suggests that the predominance of a smooth muscle component in such a tumor can be misleading and does not always warrant a diagnosis of intravenous leiomyomatosis, nor does it predict a benign clinical course. This case also provides an insight into the relationship of the endometrial stroma and myometrium, and their cell of origin and the histogenesis of endometrial stromal sarcoma.     

Uterine tumor resembling ovarian sex-cord tumor--a case report and review of the literature

A uterine tumor resembling an ovarian sex-cord tumor (UTROSCT) is a very rare lesion with only 38 cases reported in the literature so far. Here, we show an additional case of a pure UTROSCT with a DNA stemline at 1c in a 49-year-old woman presenting with abnormal vaginal bleeding. Problems in differential diagnosis arise mainly due to the variable histological picture of UTROSCT. Immunohistochemically, these tumors express cytokeratin, epithelial membrane antigen, vimentin, and smooth muscle actin. Moreover, in some cases, CD99 and alpha-inhibin are detectable. Although 36% of UTROSCT have infiltrative margins, almost all of them behave benignly. It is thus questionable whether the same prognostic criteria apply for these tumors as for endometrial stromal sarcomas. However, in the so-called mixed UTROSCT, the endometrial stromal sarcoma component determines the outcome.     

Synovial sarcoma: ultrastructural and immunohistochemical features of epithelial differentiation in monophasic and biphasic tumors

Nineteen synovial sarcomas, six biphasic and 13 monophasic tumors, were examined by light and electron microscopy and immunohistochemically for the presence of the epithelial markers keratin and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA). Ultrastructurally, intercellular spaces with processes are present to varying degrees in the spindle cell component of all synovial sarcomas, and junctional specializations occur in most cases. Tumors of the two types differ in their content of external (basal) lamina, which encloses the epithelial component of all biphasic tumors and is detectable in the spindle cell component of two thirds of them, but is absent from the majority of monophasic tumors. Keratin and EMA were demonstrated in both components of all six biphasic tumors. Of the 13 monophasic tumors, keratin was present in nine, EMA in eight, and at least one epithelial marker in ten. Synovial sarcoma is regarded as a distinctive soft tissue tumor with variable epithelial-like differentiation. The use of electron microscopy can increase the specificity of immunohistochemical studies of soft tissue sarcomas and allow more accurate differentiation of monophasic synovial sarcoma from other spindle cell tumors, particularly those that do not express markers.     

Expression of androgen receptors in benign and malignant endometrial stromal neoplasms

Several studies have shown that endometrial stromal neoplasms express estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER, PR). To our knowledge, the presence or absence of androgen receptors (AR) in these rare uterine neoplasms has not been investigated. Tumors (n=20)—3 endometrial stromal nodules, 14 low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESS, low grade), and 3 high-grade endometrial sarcomas (undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma, UES)—were studied. Immunohistochemical analyses for ER, PR, and AR were performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded archival material. Positive immunoreactions for ER and PR were observed in 14 (70%) and 17 (85%) cases, respectively. Furthermore, 9 cases (45%) were positive for AR. Among 17 ESS and UES cases, 7 (41%) revealed positivity for AR. Two of three benign stromal nodules were also positive for AR. Moreover, one of the three high-grade sarcomas (undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma) was negative for both ER and PR, but showed positive reaction for AR. In summary, ARs are expressed in 45% of endometrial stromal neoplasms. In addition to determination of ER and PR, the results of immunohistochemical examination of AR in these rare uterine tumors may have some impact on the postoperative management of the patients.     

Steroid hormone receptors in endometrial stromal sarcomas. A biochemical and immunohistochemical study.

Seven cases of endometrial stromal sarcoma (five low grade and two high grade) were analyzed immunohistochemically for the presence of estrogen and progesterone receptors. In four cases (three low grade and one high grade), these results were compared to biochemical findings. All low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas were positive for progesterone receptors using immunohistochemical techniques. These results correlated well with biochemical evaluation of progesterone receptors. The high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas were negative for progesterone and estrogen receptors by both methods. The advantages of immunohistochemical evaluation of steroid receptors have been well established in breast and endometrial carcinomas. This study demonstrates the usefulness of this technique in endometrial stromal sarcomas.     

Cytogenetic and molecular aberrations in endometrial stromal tumors

Endometrial stromal tumors (ESTs) are rare uterine mesenchymal tumors, comprising <10% of all uterine mesenchymal neoplasms. The latest World Health Organization classification divides endometrial stromal tumors into 3 categories based on morphologic features: endometrial stromal nodule (ESN), low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, and undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma. Specific cytogenetic aberrations and molecular genetic alterations have recently been identified in endometrial stromal tumors, providing insights into their molecular biology, potential diagnostic markers, and possible therapeutic targets. Currently, recurrent chromosomal rearrangements resulting in gene fusion play a substantive role in the pathogenesis of endometrial stromal nodules, endometrial stromal sarcomas, and a small subset of undifferentiated endometrial sarcomas. Loss of heterozygosity of tumor suppressor genes and deregulation of the Wnt signaling pathway have also been implicated in EST tumorigenesis. In this review, we summarize the recent advances in the molecular pathology of endometrial stromal tumors.     

Mesenchymale Uterustumoren

Uterine stromal neoplasms are classified into endometrial stromal nodules and stromal sarcomas, as well as undifferentiated sarcomas. The two former groups demonstrate identical histological composition, consisting of small monomorphous cells with scant cytoplasm and round nuclei and typically contain numerous arteriolar-type vessels. Stromal tumors are distinct from stromal nodules by virtue of their myometrial and vascular invasion. Undifferentiated sarcomas consist of polymorphic cells and lack any cytological similarity to the stroma of normal proliferative endometrium. There is no smooth or striated muscle differentiation. Adenosarcomas are mixed neoplasms with a low grade stromal sarcoma component containing benign glands, which are surrounded by condensed neoplastic stroma. Typical uterine tumors resembling ovarian sex cord tumors (UTROSCT Type2) show predominant sex cord differentiation in a well circumscribed nodule. Focal sex cord differentiation may occur in stromal nodules and stromal sarcomas (UTROSCT Type2).     

Endometrial stromal tumors: Diagnostic updates and challenges

Endometrial stromal tumors are rare uterine mesenchymal tumors of endometrial stromal origin. They are classified into endometrial stromal nodule, low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma by the current (2020) WHO classification. Correct diagnosis of endometrial stromal tumors is critical for proper patient management. However, due to infrequent encounters, overlapping morphological features and immunohistochemical profiles, the differential diagnoses among endometrial stromal lesions and their morphologic mimics are often challenging. Partially with our own experience, here we review and summarize the tumor morphology, immunohistochemical phenotype, as well as molecular feature of endometrial stromal tumors and key differential diagnoses, emphasizing the newest developments and their utilization in daily practice.     

Comparative clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical analysis of uterine sarcomas diagnosed using the World Health Organization classification system

Uterine sarcomas are rare tumors that account for 3% to 7% of uterine cancers. Their histopathologic classification was revised by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2003. The objectives of this study were to determine the frequency of different subtypes of uterine sarcoma applying the WHO criteria to a series of cases, compare the outcome of patients with different subtypes, and compare their immunoprofiles using a panel of immunomarkers. Thirty-four uterine sarcomas were identified for a 20-year period (1988-2008). Eighteen benign tumors of smooth muscle or endometrial stromal origin served as a comparison group. A tissue microarray was prepared and immunostaining performed for 10 selected oncoproteins involved in cell proliferation (Ki-67, P53, p16, and phosphatase and tensin homolog [PTEN]), cell differentiation (CD10, h-caldesmon, estrogen receptor, and progesterone receptor), and apoptosis (bcl-2 and Twist). Hierarchical clustering analysis of the immunohistochemical results was performed. The uterine sarcomas were classified as follows: 20 leiomyosarcomas, 9 endometrial stromal sarcomas, and 5 undifferentiated endometrial sarcomas. The outcome for patients with uterine sarcoma was poor, irrespective of histologic type, even for those with stage I tumors. Of the patients with follow-up available, 12 (67%) of 18 with leiomyosarcoma, 4 of 5 with undifferentiated sarcoma, and 4 of 7 with endometrial stromal sarcoma experienced recurrence and 8 patients with high-grade sarcomas died of tumor. In our series, most uterine sarcomas were leiomyosarcomas. Comparison was made between leiomyosarcomas that recurred and those with a favorable outcome and 3 patients with leiomyosarcoma without evidence of recurrence on long-term follow-up had tumors that were negative/low expressors of Ki-67, p53, p16, and Twist, with strong expression of bcl-2. A subset of undifferentiated endometrial sarcomas composed of cells with uniform nuclei may be a separate entity from those with nuclear anaplasia and may be related to low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas. It may be possible to identify a subset of leiomyosarcomas with a favorable prognosis based on staining with a panel of immunomarkers for cell proliferation and apoptosis.     

CD10 is a sensitive and diagnostically useful immunohistochemical marker of normal endometrial stroma and of endometrial stromal neoplasms

AIMS: The CD10 antigen is expressed in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and follicle centre cell lymphoma. A recent study investigating the expression of CD10 in a wide range of non-haematopoietic neoplasms found positive staining in a small number of endometrial stromal sarcomas as well as in normal endometrial stroma. The present study aimed to ascertain whether CD10 positivity is indeed found in normal endometrial stroma and endometrial stromal neoplasms. Staining of a range of tumours which can be confused morphologically with endometrial stromal neoplasms was also undertaken to ascertain whether antibodies against CD10 are of value in a diagnostic sense. METHODS AND RESULTS: Neoplasms included in the study were endometrial stromal nodule (n=1), low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) (n=13), high-grade ESS (n=6), mixed endometrial stromal-smooth muscle tumour (n=1), uterine cellular leiomyoma (n=10), uterine leiomyosarcoma (n=5), adult granulosa cell tumour (AGCT) (n=10), undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma (n=6), uterine carcinosarcoma with an endometrial stromal component (n=1) and type II uterine mesenchymal tumour with sex cord-like elements (n=1). Cases of proliferative (n=5), secretory (n=5) and atrophic (n=3) endometrium were also stained. There was positive staining of stroma but not of glands in all cases of non-tumorous endometrium. There was positive staining of the endometrial stromal nodule and of all low-grade ESS. Staining in these varied but was often diffuse and of moderate to strong intensity. There was positive staining of four of six high-grade ESS, but this was usually focal. There was also positive staining of the endometrial stromal component in the mixed endometrial stromal-smooth muscle tumour and in the uterine carcinosarcoma. Most cellular leiomyomas were completely negative although three exhibited weak positivity. There was some positivity, usually focal or weak, of three of five leiomyosarcomas. Most AGCT and undifferentiated carcinomas were completely negative although one case of each exhibited focal staining. There was focal staining of the type II uterine mesenchymal tumour with sex cord-like elements. CONCLUSION: CD10 is a reliable and sensitive immunohistochemical marker of normal endometrial stroma. Positivity, which is often strong and/or diffuse is found in endometrial stromal nodules and low-grade ESS. Positive staining with CD10, when strong and diffuse, may be useful in distinguishing these tumours from histological mimics, especially cellular leiomyoma and AGCT which are generally negative. In this situation, CD10 should be used as part of a panel which might include desmin and alpha-inhibin depending on the differential diagnosis considered. Positive staining with CD10 in a high-grade uterine sarcoma which is negative with muscle markers might indicate endometrial stromal differentiation and identify a group of neoplasms which it is correct to diagnose as high-grade ESS rather than undifferentiated uterine sarcoma.     

Endometrial stromal sarcoma of the uterus with rhabdoid features

A case of endometrial stromal sarcoma of the uterus with rhabdoid features, occurring in a 57 year old woman is reported. Electron microscopy and immunohistochemistry revealed that the rhabdoid cells contained intermediate filaments which were positive for vimentin, cytokeratin, alpha-smooth muscle actin, and muscle specific actin, but not for myoglobin and desmin. This indicated that the tumor in this case differed somewhat from the three rhabdoid tumors and an endometrial stromal sarcoma with rhabdoid differentiation previously reported and that, therefore, these tumors were heterogeneous.     

Epithelioid sarcoma: the spectrum of ultrastructural differentiation in seven immunohistochemically defined cases

Seven epithelioid sarcomas were examined by light and electron microscopy and by immunohistochemical methods for the presence of vimentin and the epithelial markers keratin and epithelial membrane antigen. All the tumors displayed vimentin and both epithelial markers. Electron microscopy showed a spectrum of cellular differentiation from primitive fibrohistiocytic cells to epithelial-type cells with junctions, microvilli, and tonofilaments. Spindle cells showed myofibroblastic and fibroblastic differentiation. Epithelioid sarcoma appears to be a tumor of primitive cells with the potential for mesenchymal and epithelial differentiation, like some embryonic tumors.     

子宫内膜间质肉瘤伴多成分分化

目的 探讨子宫内膜间质肉瘤伴多成分分化的临床、病理特征,及其鉴别诊断及预后的意义。方法 观察１７例子宫内膜间质肉瘤的组织形态,部分病例辅以免疫组织化学染色或电镜观察。结果 １３例低度恶性及４例高度恶性子宫内膜间质肉瘤表现多成分分化,其中１３例伴性索样分化,１０例伴平滑肌分化,２例伴骨分化,１例伴横纹肌分化,有９例同时伴２种多成分分化。结论 无论低度恶性或高度恶性的子宫内膜间质肉瘤均可伴多成分分化,以性索样分化与平滑肌分化最常见,少见伴骨分化或横纹肌分化。子宫内膜间质肉瘤的预后与多成分分化的数量及类型关系不大。