Ⅲ型肝门部胆管癌的外科治疗（附35例分析）

目的总结Ⅲ型肝门部胆管癌的手术经验。方法回顾性分析我院1999年1月至2006年12月，行手术切除的35例Ⅲ型肝门部胆管癌的临床资料。Ⅲa型16例，行肝门部胆管切除8例，行联合右半肝＋右侧尾状叶切除7例，行联合右半肝＋尾状叶切除、门静脉分叉部切除主干左支吻合1例。Ⅲb型19例，行肝门部胆管切除8例，行联合左半肝＋左侧尾状叶切除9例，行联合左半肝＋尾状叶切除、门静脉分叉部切除主干右支吻合1例．行联合左半肝＋尾状叶切除、门静脉分叉部切除主干右支吻合、肝固有动脉分叉部切除主干右支吻合1例。结果本组32例获得随访，随访时间18～113个月。肝门部胆管切除病例术后病理根治性切除率为37．5％，联合肝叶切除病例术后病理根治性切除率73．7％，3例联合肝叶切除＋血管切除病例均获术后病理根治性切除。肝门部胆管切除术后并发症发生率为31．3％，联合肝叶切除组术后并发症发生率为31．6％。3例联合肝叶切除＋血管切除病例术后均无胆肠吻合口漏、肝断面坏死、胆漏等严重并发症。结论联合肝叶切除，必要时行受累分叉部血管切除重建，有益于提高Ⅲ型肝门部胆管癌的根治性切除率，且不增加术后并发症的发生率。     

Safety of Conservative Management of Bile Leakage after Hepatectomy with Biliary Reconstruction

Background  The risks associated with the conservative management of bile leakage after hepatectomy and associated cholangiojejunostomy are not well defined. Aim  The aim of this study was to evaluate incidence and severity of complications associated with bile leakages after liver resection with biliary reconstruction. Patients and methods  Clinical data from 1,034 consecutive patients who underwent liver resection were prospectively collected and reviewed. Bile leakage occurred in 25 out of 119 patients (21.0%) who underwent hepatectomy with biliary reconstruction (group 1) and in 42 out of 915 patients (4.6%) without biliary anastomosis (group 2; p < 0.001). Serum albumin and bilirubin levels were the only preoperative factors significantly different between the two groups. Lymphadenectomy was more frequently performed in patients of group 1 (88% vs 16.7, p < 0.001). Results  Mortality rates were similar in the two groups (8% in group 1 vs 2.3% in group 2, p = 0.28). One or more postoperative complications occurred in 68% in group 1 and in 40.4% in group 2 (p = 0.02). The incidence of sepsis (32% vs 7.1%, p = 0.01), intra-abdominal abscess (12% vs 0, p = 0.04), and abdominal bleeding (28% vs 0, p = 0.006) was significantly higher in group 1. Bile leaks spontaneously healed in 52% of patients in group 1 vs 76.2% in group 2 (p = 0.04). In order to identify independent predictive factors for abdominal bleeding, we compared clinical data of patients with abdominal bleeding (seven patients) and without abdominal bleeding (18 patients) after hepatectomy and biliary reconstruction. Stepwise logistic regression analysis identified the number of reconstructed bile ducts as an independent predictive factor of abdominal bleeding (p = 0.038). Conclusions  Conservative management of bile leakage after liver resection with biliary reconstruction is associated with higher rates of morbidity. The most severe complication is abdominal bleeding, which is related to the number of bile ducts requiring reconstruction.     

No-touch resection of hilar malignancies with right hepatectomy and routine portal reconstruction

Background/Purpose  Locoregional recurrence following resection of hilar biliary cancers could be caused by the microscopic dissemination of cancer cells during dissection of the portal vein from the involved bile duct at the hilar region. This retrospective study assessed the feasibility and safety of a new procedure consisting of right-sided hepatectomy, caudate lobectomy, and bile duct resection combined with routine resection of the portal bifurcation to enable no-touch resection of hilar malignancies. Methods  Of 64 patients who underwent right-sided hepatectomy for hilar biliary cancer, the portal bifurcation was routinely resected by the above new procedure in 25 patients, based on preoperative imaging diagnoses. Perioperative outcomes were compared with those in patients who underwent conventional portal reconstruction (n = 18) and with those in patients who had preservation of the portal bifurcation (n = 21). Results  Perioperative data from patients with routine portal reconstruction were similar to those in the patients with conventional portal reconstruction and the patients without portal reconstruction. There were no postoperative complications directly related to portal reconstruction. Conclusions  No-touch resection of hilar malignancies with right hepatectomy and the routine use of portal reconstruction was feasible and safe. The oncologic impact of this technique merits further evaluation.     

Preoperative Biliary Drainage Increases Infectious Complications after Hepatectomy for Proximal Bile Duct Tumor Obstruction

Background  The role of preoperative biliary drainage before liver resection in jaundiced patients remains controversial. The objective of this study is to compare the perioperative outcome of liver resection for carcinoma involving the proximal bile duct in jaundiced patients with and without preoperative biliary drainage. Methods  Seventy-four consecutive jaundiced patients underwent hepatectomy for carcinoma involving the proximal bile duct from January 1989 to June 2006 and their data were retrospectively analyzed. Fourteen patients underwent biliary drainage before portal vein embolization and were excluded from the study. Thirty patients underwent biliary drainage before hepatectomy and 30 underwent liver resection without preoperative biliary drainage. All patients underwent resection of the extrahepatic bile duct. Results  Overall mortality and operative morbidity were similar in the two groups (3% vs. 10%, p = 0.612 and 70% vs. 63%, p = 0.583, respectively). The incidence of noninfectious complications was similar in the two groups. There was no difference in hospital stay between the two groups. Patients with preoperative biliary drainage had a significantly higher rate of infectious complications (40% vs. 17%, p = 0.044). At multivariate analysis, preoperative biliary drainage was the only independent risk factor for infectious complication in the postoperative course (RR = 4.411, 95%CI = 1.216-16.002, p = 0.024). Even considering patients with preoperative biliary drainage in whom the bilirubin level went below 5 mg/dl, the risk of infectious complications was higher compared with patients without biliary drainage (47.6% vs. 16.6%, p = 0.017). Conclusions  Overall mortality and morbidity after liver resection are not improved by preoperative biliary drainage in jaundiced patients. Prehepatectomy biliary drainage increases the incidence of infectious complications.     

Surgical resection for non-Asian intrahepatic lithiasis: The Brazilian experience

BackgroundIntrahepatic lithiasis (IHL) is a rare disease in the western world. Complications associated with IHL include acute cholangitis, liver atrophy, secondary biliary cirrhosis, and risk for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Liver resection is considered the treatment of choice for IHL. The objective of this study was to analyze patients who underwent liver resection for non-Asian hepatolithiasis.Methods127 patients with symptomatic non-Asian hepatolithiasis underwent resection in six institutions. Demographic data, clinical presentation, diagnosis, classification according to stone location, presence of atrophy, bile duct stricture, biliary cirrhosis, incidence of cholangiocarcinoma, treatment and postoperative course were evaluated.Results52 patients (40.9%) were male and the mean age was 46.1 years. Sixty-six patients (51.9%) presented with history of cholangitis. Stones were located in the left lobe in 63 (49.6%), and right lobe in 28 patients (22.0%). Atrophy was observed in 31 patients (24.4%) and biliary stenosis in 18 patients (14.1%). The most common procedure performed was left lateral sectionectomy in 63 (49.6%) patients, followed by left hepatectomy in 36 (28.3%), right hepatectomy in 19 (15.0%), and associated hepaticojejunostomy in 28 (22.0%). Forty-two patients (33.0%) presented postoperative complications and the most common were biliary fistula (13.3%) and surgical site infection (7.0%). Postoperative mortality was 0.7%. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was observed in 2 patients (1.5%). Recurrence was identified in 10 patients (7.8%), mostly with bilateral stones and/or hepaticojejunostomy.ConclusionLiver resection is the standard treatment for symptomatic unilateral or complicated IHL with good operative results. Risk of cholangiocarcinoma was low in non-Asian patients.     

Anatomic versus non-anatomic resection of hepatocellular carcinoma with microvascular invasion: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The efficacy of anatomical resection (AR) and non-anatomical resection (NR) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with microvascular invasion (MVI) remains unknown. This study compared the safety and outcomes of these surgical procedures. A systematic literature search was conducted. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS). Overall hazard ratio (HR) was calculated from Kaplan–Meier plots and outcomes using random-effects models. There was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the AR and NR groups (risk ratio [RR]: 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72–1.17, p = 0.496). OS was higher with AR at 1 year (RR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.45–0.98, p = 0.037), 3 years (RR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.50–0.82, p = 0.000), and 5 years (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.65–0.89, p = 0.001). AR was associated with a higher OS rate (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.47–0.82, p = 0.001). AR was associated with improved DFS at 1 year (RR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.52 to 0.82, p = 0.000), 3 years (RR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.86, p = 0.000), and 5 years (95% CI: 0.75 to 0.94, p = 0.002). Compared with NR, AR had significant advantages on overall HR of DFS (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.91, p = 0.012). In conclusion, AR was associated with higher rates of OS and DFS in HCC patients with MVI. Thus, for well-presented liver function HCC patients which are predicted to have positive MVI, AR is recommended.     

Association between Kasai portoenterostomy at low caseload centres and transplant complications in children with biliary atresia

BackgroundKasai portoenterostomy (KPE) is the preferred treatment for biliary atresia (BA) patients. It has been shown that the center caseload of KPE impacts on native liver survival. We aimed to define the impact of KPE caseload on complications at the time of liver transplantation (LT).MethodsRetrospective data collection of LT for BA performed in our tertiary center between 2010 and 2018. The patients were grouped according to the caseload of the center that performed KPE: Group A (≥5 KPE/year) and Group B (<5 KPE/year). We analyzed total transplant time (TTT), hepatectomy time, amount of plasma and red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, occurrence of bowel perforations at LT.ResultsAmong 115 patients, Group A (n 44) and Group B (n 71) were comparable for age, sex, PELD score, TTT. The groups differed for: median hepatectomy time (57 min, IQR = 50–67; vs 65, IQR 55–89, p = 0.045); RBC transfusions (95 ml, IQR 0–250; vs 200 ml, IQR 70–500, p = 0.017); bowel perforations (0/44 vs 15/71, p = 0.001). One-year graft loss in Group A vs Group B was 1/44 vs 7/71 (p = 0.239), whereas deaths were 0/44 vs 5/71 respectively (p = 0.183); 5/15 patients who had a perforation eventually lost the graft.ConclusionsThis study found an association between KPE performed in low caseload center and the incidence of complications at LT. These patients tend to have a worse outcome. The centralization of KPE to referral center represents an advantage at the time of LT.Mini abstractWe studied the impact of Kasai portoenterostomy (KPE) caseload on complications at the time of liver transplantation (LT), in 115 patients. We found an association between KPE performed in low caseload center and increased bowel perforations and blood transfusions. We suggest to centralize to experienced center all children requiring KPE.     

Integration of a dedicated management protocol in the care of pediatric liver cancer: From specialized providers to complication reduction

IntroductionUp to a third of children undergoing partial hepatectomy for primary hepatic malignancies experience at least one perioperative complication, with a presumed deleterious effect on both short- and long-term outcomes. We implemented a multidisciplinary treatment protocol in the management of these patients in order to improve complication rates following partial hepatectomy.MethodsA retrospective chart review was completed for all patients < 18 years of age who underwent liver resection at our institution between 2002 and 2019 for primary hepatic cancer. Demographic, intraoperative, postoperative, pathologic, and outcome data were analyzed for perioperative complications using the CLASSIC and Clavien-Dindo (CD) scales, event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS).ResultsA total of 73 patients were included in the analysis with 33 prior-to and 40 after dedicated provider protocol implementation. Perioperative complication rates decreased from 52% to 20% (p = 0.005) with major complications going from 18% to 10% (p = 0.31). On multivariable logistic regression, protocol implementation was associated with a reduction in any (OR 0.29 [95% CI 0.09 – 0.89]) but not major complications. On multivariate cox models, post protocol implementation was associated with improved event free survival (EFS) (HR 0.19 (0.036 – 0.195). Among patients with a diagnosis of hepatoblastoma (n = 62), the occurrence of a major perioperative complication was associated with a worse EFS (HR=5.45, p = 0.03) on multivariate analysis, however this did not translate into an impact on overall survival.ConclusionsOur results demonstrate that, for children with primary liver malignancies, a dedication of patients to high-volume surgeons can improve rates of complications of liver resections and may improve the oncological outcome of hepatoblastoma.     

The differential effect of BMI on prosthetic versus autogenous breast reconstruction: A multivariate analysis of 12,986 patients

BackgroundThe comparative safety of breast reconstruction in obese patients remains to be clearly defined. This study utilized multi-institutional data to characterize the effect of body mass index (BMI) on breast reconstruction outcomes.MethodsUtilizing Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, patients undergoing tissue expander, pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap, latissimus dorsi flap, and free flap breast reconstruction were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Patients were stratified as obese (BMI ≥ 30) and non-obese (BMI < 30). Overall postoperative morbidity, flap complications, non-flap complications, and reoperation rates were compared among the groups.ResultsOf 12,986 patients who underwent breast reconstruction, 3636 (28.0%) were obese. Overall morbidity was significantly elevated in obese patients across all forms of reconstruction (p < 0.05). BMI was correlated with increased surgical complications for tissue expander, pedicled TRAM, and free flap reconstructions (OR = 1.09, OR = 1.05, OR = 1.10, respectively; p < 0.05). Medical complications were higher in obese patients undergoing tissue expander and pedicled TRAM reconstructions (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001), but no significant difference was observed in latissimus and free flap reconstruction patients. Compared with obese tissue expander recipients, obese patients reconstructed using autologous tissue had higher rates of reoperations (12.8% versus 9.1%), overall morbidity (18.0% versus 9.5%), surgical (12.7% versus 8.3%), and medical complications (9.0% versus 2.2%).ConclusionsThe NSQIP database allows for evaluation and comparison of reconstructive outcomes in the obese population. Increased BMI was associated with higher morbidity in autologous reconstruction than tissue expander reconstruction. Among autologous procedures, latissimus flaps experienced the lowest captured 30 day morbidity.     

联合肝切除术结合肝动脉重建治疗10例肝门部胆管癌临床分析

目的分析联合肝切除术结合肝动脉重建治疗肝门部胆管癌10例患者的应用效果。方法回顾性分析2016年1月至2017年2月10例均接受联合肝切除术结合肝动脉重建治疗的肝门部胆管癌患者资料,分析手术情况、围术期并发症及随访结果。结果10例患者中实施左半肝联合尾状叶切除4例(Ⅲb型),右半肝联合尾状叶切除3例(Ⅲa型),尾状叶切除2例(Ⅱ型),切除肝门部胆管及部分左内叶、右前叶及尾状叶1例(Ⅳ型);接受肝右动脉切除重建6例,肝固有动脉切除重建4例;R0切除率为80.0%,围术期均无死亡病例,术后胆瘘、消化道出血、肝动脉血栓继发胆道感染各1例(10.0%),均经保守治疗后症状好转;术后随访9~24个月,3例患者分别因肿瘤复发、肝动脉血栓、肝脓肿而死亡,术后24个月的生存率为70.0%(7/10)。结论给予肝门部胆管癌患者联合肝切除术结合肝动脉重建治疗可提高R0切除率,改善肝功能,且患者围术期并发症少、术后生存率高。     

Liver resective surgery: a multivariate analysis of postoperative outcome and complication

Introduction

Notwithstanding technical advances and high experience of liver resection of specialized centers, the rate of complications after surgical resection could be high. In this study, we analyzed causes and foreseeable risk factors linked to postoperative morbidity on the ground of data derived from a single center surgical population.

Materials and methods

From September 1989 to March 2005, 134 consecutive patients had liver resection for Hcc and 153 consecutive patients with liver metastasis (derived from either colorectal cancer or noncolorectal cancer) at our department. We performed 22 major hepatectomy, 20 left hepatectomy, 14 trisegmentectomy, 77 bisegmentectomy and/or left lobectomy, 74 segmentectomy, and 80 wedge resection.

Results

In-hospital mortality rate was 4.5%, about 7% in Hcc cases and 2.6% in liver metastasis. Morbidity rate was 47.7%, caused by the rising of ascites (10%), temporary impairment liver function (19%), biliary fistula (6%), hepatic abscess (25%), hemoperitoneum (10%), and pleural effusion (30%) sometimes combined each other. Some variables, associated with the technical aspects of surgical procedure, are responsible of the rising of complication as: Pringle maneuver length of more than 20 minutes (p=0.001); the type of liver resection procedure [major hepatectomy (p=0.02), left hepatectomy (p=0.04), trisegmentectomy (p=0.04), bisegmentectomy and/or left lobectomy (p=0.04)]; and the request of an amount of blood transfusion of more than 600 cc (p=0.04). Also, both liver dysfunction, in particular Child A vs B and C (p=0.01), and histopathological grading (p=0.01) are associated with a high rate of postsurgical complication in Hcc cases.

Conclusion

We make the following recommendations: every liver resection should be planned after intraoperative ultrasonography, anatomical surgical procedure should be preferred instead of wedge resection, and modern devices should be used, like Argon Beam and Ligasure^® dissector, to reduce the incidence of both intraoperative and postoperative bleeding and biliary leakage.

     

Single vs Multiple Arterial Reconstructions in Living Donor Liver Transplant

BackgroundIt is true that multiple arterial reconstructions are sometimes required in living donor liver transplant (LDLT). However, the best procedure is still controversial regarding arterial reconstruction in liver grafts with multiple arteries.MethodsA total of 93 patients, 55 right lobe grafts and 38 left lobe grafts, who underwent LDLT at our university from 2003 to 2017 were enrolled for this study. Regarding arterial reconstruction in grafts with multiple hepatic arteries, the dominant artery was reconstructed first. Subsequently, when both the pulsating arterial flow from the remaining artery stumps and the intra-graft arterial flow by Doppler ultrasonography were confirmed, the remaining arteries were not reconstructed. The patients were divided into the following 3 groups: (1) single artery/single reconstruction (n = 81), (2) selective arterial reconstruction of multiple arterial grafts (n = 7), and (3) multiple arterial reconstructions (n = 5).ResultsA total of 12.9% (12/93; right lobe: 2/55; left lobe 10/38) of grafts had multiple arteries. The incidence of multiple arteries was significantly higher in the left lobe grafts (P = .0029). The arterial diameters (SD) of multiple arterial grafts were narrower (2.43 [0.84] mm) than single arterial grafts (3.70 [1.30] mm) (P = .0135). Extra-anatomic arterial reconstruction were frequently required in multiple arterial reconstructions (group 1 and 2 vs 3) (P = .0007). The strategy of selective arterial reconstruction with the above criteria did not negatively affect the rates of biliary complications or the overall patient survival (P = .52).ConclusionsIt can be argued that selective arterial reconstructions demonstrated acceptable outcomes in LDLT, provided that the above criteria were satisfied.     

Factors affecting acid base status during hepatectomy in cirrhotic patients

ObjectiveTo study acid base changes during hepatectomy in cirrhotic patients and their relations to intraoperative variables and different preoperative scoring systems used to asses hepatic patients.MethodsAfter obtaining approval of the Ethics and Research Committee of the National Liver Institute – Menoufia University and written informed patient consent, 80 patients scheduled for hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma were included in the study. Anesthesia was induced with propofol, fentanyl, and rocuronium then maintained with desflurane and 50% O₂ in air. Samples for arterial blood gases and serum lactate were withdrawn from a left radial artery catheter just before the start of resection of liver parenchyma and immediately after its completion. Intraoperative events were recorded including use of Pringle maneuver and fluids and blood products infusions.ResultsNo differences were found in study parameters between Child class A and B patients except for the preresection lactate (p = 0.02). Patients with MELD score <11 had higher preresection HCO₃ (p = 0.004), higher BE (p = 0.002), and lower lactate (p = 0.001) than patients with MELD score ?11. These findings were true also for patients with MELD-Na score <11 as they had higher preresection HCO₃ (p = 0.001), higher BE (p = 0.001), and lower lactate (p < 0.001) than patients with MELD-Na score ?11. All patients had significant decrease in pH (p < 0.001), HCO₃ (p < 0.001), and BE (p < 0.001) and significant increase in lactate (p < 0.001). These changes were augmented by intraoperative RBCs and FFP transfusion, using Pringle maneuver, but type of hepatectomy had significant effect only on HCO₃ and BE. Again these changes in pH, HCO₃, BE, and lactate were more obvious in patients with preoperative MELD score ?11, and this was also true in patients with preoperative MELD-Na score ?11 only with HCO₃, BE, and lactate, but not with pH.ConclusionChanges occurred in acid base status during hepatectomy in cirrhotic patients are affected by the preoperative condition of the patient (MELD and MELD-Na scores) as well as by intraoperative transfusion of blood products, use of Pringle maneuver and to a lesser extent by major versus minor hepatectomy.     

Preoperative Chemotherapy Does Not Increase Morbidity or Mortality of Hepatic Resection for Colorectal Cancer Metastases

Hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer (mCRC) is best treated with a multidisciplinary approach. Conflicting data exist regarding the impact of preoperative chemotherapy on morbidity and mortality after hepatectomy. We hypothesized that preoperative chemotherapy does not adversely impact complications or mortality associated with hepatectomy. A retrospective analysis was performed and included patients with mCRC who underwent hepatectomy from 1996 to 2006. Patients were separated into two groups: those who received preoperative chemotherapy and those who did not. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the factors associated with morbidity and mortality. Kaplan–Meier analyses were performed to determine disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). One hundred eighty-six patients were analyzed: 112 (60%) received preoperative chemotherapy for a median of 4.2 months. Eighty patients (43%) underwent major hepatectomy. When comparing the two groups, there were no differences in hepatic tumor size (median 3 cm; p = 0.35), type of resection (p = 0.62), stage (p = 0.44) or location (p = 0.10) of the primary tumor, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (p = 0.80), or number of nodes in lymphadenectomy (p = 0.62). Only number of positive nodes after colectomy (p = 0.02), age (p ≤ 0.0001), and combined resection/radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (p = 0.004) were statistically different between the two groups. There was no difference in rates of morbidity (p = 0.81), mortality (p = 0.29), DFS (p = 0.25) or OS (p = 0.30). We conclude that the use of preoperative chemotherapy did not increase the risk of complications or death for patients undergoing hepatectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Pre-hepatectomy chemotherapy appears to be safe and is an important part of the multidisciplinary approach for this disease.     

Higher body mass index is a more important risk factor than sarcopenia for complications in reconstruction of the deep inferior epigastric perforator

BackgroundIn recent years, breast reconstruction using autologous tissue after breast cancer surgery has become a common procedure. This study investigated the association between the occurrence of complications in breast reconstruction using deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps and patient risk factors among Asian women.MethodsThis study included cases of breast reconstruction using DIEP flaps performed at our institution. We retrospectively investigated the relationship between preoperative and operative patient factors and postoperative complications by collecting data from medical records. Sarcopenia was also evaluated by calculating psoas muscle index from the area of the iliopsoas muscle at the level of the third lumbar vertebra using images from preoperative computed tomography. Postoperative complications were compared between a low-body mass index (BMI) group and a high-BMI group, defined using BMI values of <25 kg/m² and ≥25 kg/m², respectively.ResultsA total of 129 cases of breast reconstruction using DIEP flaps were included in this analysis. The frequency of postoperative complications was significantly higher in the high-BMI group, including for skin flap necrosis of the breast (p = 0.03), recipient-site infection (p = 0.03), and donor-site seroma (p = 0.003). Moreover, abdominal circumference correlated significantly with recipient-site infection (p = 0.01) and donor-site seroma (p = 0.002). Sarcopenia did not show significant correlations with any complications.ConclusionBMI was identified as a risk factor for the occurrence of postoperative complications in breast reconstruction using the DIEP flap, but sarcopenia was not.     

A Single-Center's Early Surgical Outcomes of Living Donor Liver Transplantation

BackgroundLiving donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has become an increasingly common surgical option because the number of cadaveric donors is insufficient to fulfill the organ needs of patients facing end-stage cirrhosis. Many centers are investigating different surgical techniques to achieve lower complication rates. We aimed to examine our complication rates in light of demographic data, graft data, and perioperative findings as a single-center experience.MethodsThe study included one hundred and three patients who underwent LDLT for end-stage liver cirrhosis. Demographic data; sex; age; blood group; Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score; Child score; etiology; liver side; graft-to-recipient weight ratio; hepatic artery, portal vein, and bile anastomosis type rates; anhepatic phase; cold ischemia time; operation time; and blood product transfusion rates were analyzed. Biliary complications in patients with single or multiple biliary anastomoses, right or left liver transplants, and with or without hepatic artery thrombosis were analyzed statistically.ResultsThere was no significant difference in biliary complications between patients who underwent single or multiple bile anastomosis (P = .231) or patients receiving right lobe and left lobe transplants (P = .315). Although there was no statistically significant difference in the rate of portal vein thrombosis between the regular and reconstructed portal vein anastomosis groups (P = .693), the postoperative portal vein thrombosis rate was statistically higher in patients with left lobe transplants (P = .044).ConclusionsVascular and biliary complication rates can be reduced with increasing experience.     

Complications of laser enucleation of the prostate: Results at two institutions

ObjectiveBenign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) is a common disease with bothersome symptoms. Conventional transurethral resection of prostate is the gold standard surgical treatment. Recently, various laser enucleation techniques of the prostate for BPH have been adopted worldwide. We report perioperative and postoperative complications with the modified Clavien classification system at two institutions.Materials and methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis through chart review among patients who had undergone laser enucleation of the prostate for BPH in two tertiary referral centers between January, 2009 and December, 2012. The primary outcome was peri- and postoperative complications, whereas secondary outcome was duration of hospital stay and catheterization. The mean age of 271 patients was 72.1 years (range, 51–93 years). Their mean prostate volume was 62.8 mL (range, 22–270 mL). Fifty-seven (21%) patients had prostate volume > 80 mL. There were 101 patients and 169 patients in the diode and thulium groups, respectively.ResultsNo patients had Grade 5 complications. There were Grade 4a complications in three (1.1%) patients, Grade 3a in 22 (8.1%) patients, Grade 2 in nine (3.3%) patients, and Grade 1 in 62 (22.9%) patients. The prostate volume > 80 mL was not significantly related to higher complication rate (p = 0.456). The average duration of hospital stay and catheterization were 3.05 ± 0.75 days and 2.25 ± 1.29 days. Four patients (1.5%) needed secondary resection for residual prostate tissue. The complication rate of acute urine retention (AUR; p = 0.285), urethral stricture (p = 0.996), minor (p = 0.430), major (p = 0.371), or all complications (p = 0.105) was not statistically different between diode and thulium groups.ConclusionLaser enucleation of the prostate was a safe treatment with low significant complication rate, even for large-volume prostates. The complication rates between diode and thulium lasers were not significantly different. The reoperation rate of laser enucleation was very low but patients with extremely large prostate volume may have higher risk.     

Postreperfusion Biopsy as a Predictor of Biliary Complication After Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation. A Retrospective Cohort Study

BackgroundIschemia reperfusion injury (IRI) on postreperfusion biopsies is associated with worse outcomes after liver transplantation, although the influence on biliary complications (BC) remains poorly studied. Therefore, the primary aim of our study was to assess the influence of IRI on the incidence of BC. A secondary aim was to assess the influence of steatosis on biliary complications and determine factors that predictor BC.MethodsWe report a retrospective cohort study including patients with liver transplantation and postreperfusion injury. Biopsies were classified as relevant and nonrelevant ischemia reperfusion injury for assessment of BC. BC included anastomotic stricture, ischemic cholangiopathy, leaks, and bilomas. Independent predictive factors of biliary complications were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses.Results302 patients were included, and 125 patients fulfilled the criteria for relevant IRI (41.4%). Worse IRI was not associated with biliary complications (42.5% vs 40.1%; P = .68), nor was liver graft steatosis associated with BC (40.5% vs 41.5%, P = .95). The median time until biliary complications did not differ between the 2 groups (2 months; interquartile range = 1-15 vs 3 months; interquartile range = 1-12.5; P = .18). Hepatic artery thrombosis (odds ratio [OR] = 3.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-8.2; P = .004), older donor age (OR = 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1-4.1; P = .024), and prolonged cold ischemia time (OR = 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.2) were independent factors of biliary complications.ConclusionSevere IRI on the postreperfusion injury does not predict development of biliary complications.     

The value of three-dimensional visualization techniques in hepatectomy for complicated hepatolithiasis: A propensity score matching study

ObjectiveThe present study aimed to investigate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of three-dimensional visualization technique (3DVT)-guided hepatectomy in the treatment of complicated hepatolithiasis.MethodsThe clinical and follow-up data of 279 patients with complicated hepatolithiasis were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into a 3DVT group (group A, 66 cases) and a non-3DVT group (group B, 213 cases). After baseline data were balanced using propensity score matching (PSM), the clinical characteristics and follow-up data of the two groups were observed.ResultsAfter 1:1 PSM, 58 patients in each group were successfully matched with each other. When the groups were compared, the surgical duration (p = 0.033) and intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.002) of group A were lower than those of group B. The immediate stone clearance rate (91.4% vs. 75.9%, p = 0.024) and quality of life outcome (p = 0.034) of group A were significantly higher than those of group B. Logistic regression analysis showed that history of two or more biliary tract operations (odds ratio [OR] = 6.544, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.193–35.890, p = 0.031), bilateral stone distribution (OR = 4.198, 95% CI = 1.186–14.854, p = 0.026), and Geng grade III or IV (OR = 12.262, 95% CI = 2.224–67.617, p = 0.004) were independent risk factors for poor outcomes in patients with complicated hepatolithiasis.ConclusionCompared to conventional imaging examinations, 3DVT can be used to guide and achieve accurate preoperative diagnosis of complicated hepatolithiasis and has good safety, feasibility, and efficacy.     

Comparison of surgical outcomes for laparoscopic liver resection of large hepatocellular carcinomas: A retrospective observation from single-center experience

Background/purposeAlthough laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is a common surgical procedure for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), its suitability for large HCCs (≥5 cm) remains controversial. This study compared surgical outcomes of open hepatectomy with LLR for large HCCs.MethodsA total of 313 patients with HCC who underwent hepatectomy between January 2010 and June 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. Demographic data, short-term outcomes, and long-term survivals were analyzed.ResultsAmong patients with large HCCs (n = 122), the open group (n = 85) had larger tumor sizes (10.91 ± 4.72 vs. 7.45 ± 2.95 cm; p < 0.001) and more advanced stages (stages 3/4: 71.8% vs. 45.9%; p = 0.029) than the LLR group (n = 37), while LLR group achieved less blood loss (623.24 ± 841.75 mL vs. 1091.76 ± 1004.72 mL, p = 0.014) and shorter LOS (9.00 ± 5.13 d vs. 12.82 ± 8.51 d, p = 0.013). There were no significant differences in complication and mortality rates between groups. The 5-year overall and recurrence-free survival rates between the two groups were not significantly different (p = 0.408 and 0.644 respectively). The surgical outcomes showed equal benefit of the two operation types.ConclusionWith sufficient surgeon experience and appropriate patient selection, LLR is a feasible treatment choice for large HCCs.