A prospective multicenter evaluation of immediately functionalized tapered conical connection implants for single restorations in maxillary anterior and premolar sites: 3-year results

Objectives

This multicenter prospective clinical trial investigated immediately provisionalized, anodized, conical connection, tapered implants with platform shifting in maxillary anterior and premolar sites.

Materials and methods

Patients requiring single-tooth implant-supported restorations in maxillary anterior and premolar sites were enrolled. Implants were immediately provisionalized and evaluated at insertion, 6 months, and annually thereafter. Outcome measures were marginal bone level change (ΔMBL), cumulative survival rate (CSR), and success rate, soft-tissue parameters, and oral health impact profile (OHIP). ΔMBL and Pink Esthetic Score were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. CSR was calculated using life table analysis. Other soft-tissue parameters were analyzed using sign tests.

Results

Of 94 enrolled patients (99 implants), 84 (88 implants) attended the 3-year follow-up. After an initial bone loss between implant insertion and 6 months (− 0.92 ± 1.23 mm), bone levels stabilized from 6 months to 3 years (0.13 ± 0.94 mm) with no significant change. The 3-year CSR was 98.9%, and the cumulative success rate was 96.9%. Papilla index scores of 2 or 3 were observed at 88.6% of sites at the 3-year visit compared with 32.8% at implant insertion. Improvements were observed for all other outcomes, including bleeding on probing, esthetics, plaque, and OHIP.

Conclusions

This restorative protocol was associated with high primary stability, patient satisfaction, stable bone levels, and an overall improvement of the soft tissue outcomes over a 3-year period.

Clinical relevance

The presented treatment is a viable option for single-tooth restorations of maxillary anterior teeth and premolars with successful short- to mid-long-term clinical outcomes.

     

Implant-supported single-tooth restorations: a 5-year prospective study

BACKGROUND: Comparatively few studies are available reporting at least 5 years of follow-up data of implant-supported single-tooth replacements. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prospectively the 5-year outcome of implant-supported single-tooth prosthetic restorations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty subjects (mean age 41 years), 23 males and 17 females, who required single-tooth prosthetic replacement for a missing tooth were recruited. A total of 45 self-tapping implants (Astra Tech ST-implants)--40 in the maxilla and five in the mandible--were installed in a two-stage procedure. Abutment connection was performed 3-6 months after implant installation. Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed at the completion of the prosthetic treatment and once a year during a 5-year follow-up period. The analysis of peri-implant bone level alteration was performed on subject and implant levels and by the use of analysis of variance and binary logistic regression. RESULTS: Three patients were lost during the 5 years of follow-up. One implant was lost after 2.5 years in function and another four implants could not be accounted for at the 5-year follow-up examination. The overall failure rate at 5 years was 2.6% (subject level) and 2.3% (implant level). The mean loss of marginal bone at the implants during the first year in function was 0.06 mm (SD 0.67) on the subject level and 0.02 mm (0.65) on the implant level. During the subsequent 4 years the annual change in peri-implant bone level amounted to -0.02 mm (0.22) on both subject and implant levels. Thus, the mean total bone level change over the 5-year interval was -0.14 mm (1.04) on subject level and -0.11 mm (1.00) on the implant level of analysis (p>0.05). The frequency of implants with a 5-year bone loss of > or =1 mm was 13%. Approximately 50% of the implants demonstrated no bone loss. CONCLUSION: The present clinical trial on single-tooth replacements with the Astra Tech implant system demonstrated that the bone loss during the first year of function as well as annually thereafter was small.     

Interdisciplinary treatment planning for single-tooth restorations in the esthetic zone

This article presents a conservative approach for restoring single anterior teeth in patients with congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors, emphasizing the importance of interdisciplinary treatment planning. Minor orthodontic treatment was necessary to create the space for implant placement. Once the fixtures were inserted and the temporary abutments connected to the implants, the provisionals were relined with the use of a repositioning stone key. From the diagnostic wax-up, it was decided that in order to attain a satisfying final esthetic outcome, it was necessary to also restore the distal aspect of the central incisors and the right first premolar for anatomical and functional reasons. Finally, after having screwed the abutments on the implants, inducing a torque of 20 Ncm, the metal-ceramic restorations were cemented with temporary cement. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This article presents a systematic approach for restoring anterior teeth in the esthetic zone using a diagnostic additive wax-up and an interdisciplinary approach to optimize the final esthetic outcome.     

Morse taper connection implants supporting "planned" maxillary and mandibular bar-retained overdentures: a 5-year prospective multicenter study

Objectives: In contrast to the excellent long‐term outcomes described for implant‐supported mandibular overdentures, less favorable long‐term survival and success rates have been reported for maxillary implants supporting overdentures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment outcome of “planned” bar‐retained maxillary and mandibular overdentures supported by Morse taper connection implants, investigating implant survival, peri‐implant tissue health, marginal bone resorption and prosthetic complications. Material and methods: Over a 2‐year period, 60 patients were enrolled in this study, in four different clinical centers. The overdentures (maxilla 38, mandible 34) were planned with support from four implants anchored on a bar. A total of 288 Morse taper connection implants (Leone Implant System^®) were inserted (152 maxilla, 136 mandible). Implants were evaluated 5 years after insertion. Success criteria included the absence of pain, suppuration or clinical mobility, the distance between implant shoulder and first crestal bone–implant contact (DIB) <2 mm and no exudate history. Results: The overall 5‐year implant survival rate was 98% (maxilla 97.4%, mandible 98.6%), with 282 implants still in function. Among these surviving implants, 278 (98.6%) were classified in the success group. At the 5‐year examination, the mean DIB was 0.7 mm (±0.53). Few prosthetic complications were reported. Conclusions: With “planned” bar‐retained maxillary and mandibular overdentures supported by Morse taper connection implants, satisfactory survival and success rate can be achieved. To cite this article:
Mangano C, Mangano F, Shibli JA, Ricci M, Sammons R, Figliuzzi M. Morse taper connection implants supporting “planned” maxillary and mandibular bar‐retained overdentures: a 5‐year prospective multicenter study.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22 , 2011; 1117–1124
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.02079.x     

Influence of different implant-abutment connection designs on the mechanical and biological behavior of single-tooth implants in the maxillary esthetic zone: A systematic review

Statement of problem

A consensus regarding which implant-abutment connection type would perform best in the anterior maxilla is lacking.

Guided bone regeneration around single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone: a case series

The objective of this case series was to evaluate the clinical and histologic outcome of guided bone regeneration around simultaneously placed implants in sites with missing buccal bone walls. Eight weeks after tooth extraction, implants were inserted, and the sites were augmented in both the horizontal and vertical dimensions using a mineralized collagen bone substitute and a nonresorbable titanium-reinforced membrane. Six months later, small hard tissue biopsy specimens were harvested from the buccal bone walls at approximately mid-height of the original defect. The histologies revealed ongoing bone formation. Clinically, an adequate amount of hard and soft tissue volume had formed.     

A 3-year prospective clinical and radiologic analysis of early loaded maxillary dental implants supporting single-tooth crowns

In this study, 19 patients were treated with 36 Br?nemark System MK III TiUnite implants in the maxilla. Definitive implant-supported single crowns were delivered to patients 6 weeks after implant placement. Clinical and radiographic parameters were recorded at baseline, and at 1, 2, and 3 years. Both implant and prosthesis success rates were 94% after 3 years. The average marginal bone loss was 0.97 mm after 3 years. The results of this study indicate that 6-week early loading of TiUnite surface implants in the maxilla was reliable and predictable for this patient population and may offer an alternative to the standard loading protocol.     

Immediate loading of single-tooth ITI implants in the anterior maxilla: a prospective 5-year pilot study

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the success rate of immediately loaded single-tooth ITI solid plasma-sprayed (TPS) implants in the maxilla. Eight implants were loaded immediately after placement in eight different patients, and were followed for five years. Temporary acrylic resin restorations, which were fabricated from impressions that were taken immediately after implant placement, were connected one week later. These temporary restorations were adjusted in order to avoid any direct occlusive contacts. After six months, the provisional crowns were replaced by definitive ceramic crowns. Regular follow-ups were performed during the investigation period. No implants were lost, and the mean marginal bone level for the eight implants increased by 0.53 mm (range - 0.83 to + 1.54 mm) from placement to the final examination. Only minor complications were noted, and overall patient satisfaction was high.     

Clinical evaluation of small-diameter implants in single-tooth and multiple-implant restorations: a 7-year retrospective study

PURPOSE: Placement of small-diameter implants often provides a solution to space-related problems in implant restoration. This 7-year retrospective study presents results from 192 small-diameter implants placed in 165 patients from 1992 to 1996. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The dental records of each patient were reviewed. The implants, which were either 2.9 mm or 3.25 mm in diameter, were placed by 2 different surgeons. All prosthetic appliances were fabricated by the same prosthodontist. Ninety-four implants supported single-tooth cemented restorations; the remaining 98 implants supported cemented or screw-retained partial prostheses. RESULTS: The total implant survival rate was 95.3%. Four implants were lost at second-stage surgery, and 5 more were lost after loading. DISCUSSION: Small-diameter implants demonstrated a survival rate similar to those reported in previous studies of standard-size implants. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that small-diameter implants can be successfully included in implant treatment. They may be preferable in cases where space is limited.     

Radiographic and clinical evaluation of single-tooth Biolok implants: a 5-year study

PURPOSE: The purpose of this prospective clinical and radiographic study was to evaluate Biolok implants used for single-tooth replacement during 5 years of function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients received Biolok implants for single-tooth replacement. Clinical and radiographic recordings were made at baseline (placement of restoration) and at 1, 3, and 5 years. Plaque Index (PI), Gingival Index (GI), and clinical attachment level were the clinical parameters recorded. Clinical attachment level was measured using a customized probing template and a standard pressure electronic probe. Bone level changes were measured from standardized radiographs. Clinical attachment level and bone level were recorded to the nearest 0.1 mm. Correlations between clinical attachment level, bone level, PI, and GI were evaluated. RESULTS: The cumulative survival rate was 97.4% (38 of 39 implants). The mean clinical attachment level change over 5 years was a loss of 0.17+/-0.23 mm. Significant correlations between clinical attachment level change and PI were found at 3 and 5 years (P < .015). Significant correlations between clinical attachment level change and GI were not found (P >.05). Mean bone loss was 0.83+/-0.03 mm from baseline to 1 year, 0.26+/-0.03 mm from 1 year to 3 years, and 0.14+/-0.04 mm from 3 to 5 years. Significant correlations between bone level changes and PI or GI were not found (P > .05). DISCUSSION: Over a 5-year evaluation period, the bone levels and clinical attachment levels were stable. These results were consistent with other studies of single-tooth implants. CONCLUSIONS: After 5 years of function, the results suggest that Biolok implants can be successfully used for single-tooth replacement.     

Nonrigid connection of tooth with implants in the esthetic zone with a ceramic restoration: a clinical report

Restoring edentulous areas with fixed prostheses can be challenging, especially when key abutment teeth are missing and implant placement is not an option. Sometimes, clinicians are faced with situations where teeth have to be connected with implants even though long-term prognosis of those connections may be questionable. This clinical report presents a connection of 2 implants with 1 tooth in the esthetic zone with a nonrigid connection. Two zirconia custom abutments and 1 zirconia coping definitively cemented on the tooth were used. A zirconia superstructure, veneered with porcelain, was cemented with provisional cement on the abutments and the coping.     

Alumina ceramic implant abutments used for single-tooth replacement: a prospective 1- to 3-year multicenter study

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to compare results after 1 and 3 years when single crowns supported by CerAdapt (test) ceramic abutments or CeraOne (control) titanium abutments were loaded. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The material was divided into two groups: in group A, 69 (34 test, 35 control) abutments/crowns from all involved clinics were followed for 1 year; and in group B, 20 (10 test, 10 control) abutments/crowns from one of the clinics were followed for 3 years. RESULTS: No implant failed, giving a cumulative success rate of 100% for the implants. Two CerAdapt abutments in group A fractured, giving a cumulative success rate of 93% for the CerAdapt and 100% for the CeraOne abutments after 1 year. No abutment failed in group B, giving a cumulative success rate of 100% both for the CerAdapt and the CeraOne abutments between 1 and 3 years. The CerAdapt fractures might have been due to the fact that the abutments were impaired through too-extensive preparation and/or had been exposed to a too-high bending moment. Almost no marginal bone loss was recorded, indicating a stable bone situation both at CerAdapt and CeraOne abutments on single-tooth implants. Healthy conditions, with a relatively stable level of the periimplant mucosa in relation to the abutment/crown, were recorded for soft tissues both at CerAdapt and CeraOne abutments. Both clinicians and patients rated the esthetic result as excellent for practically all cases. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate the esthetic possibilities and the safety of single-tooth replacement when accepted treatment concepts are followed and documented components are used. The tested abutments worked well, although the fractured CerAdapt abutments indicate that ceramic abutments are more sensitive to handling procedures than the titanium abutments.     

Experimental zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study

PURPOSE: This prospective clinical study evaluated an experimental implant abutment made of densely sintered zirconia with respect to peri-implant hard and soft tissue reaction as well as fracture resistance over time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven consecutively treated patients with 54 single-tooth implants were included. Zirconia abutment ingots were individually shaped and set on the implants with gold screws. All-ceramic (Empress I) crowns were cemented using a composite cement. At the 1- and 4-year examinations, reconstructions were evaluated for technical problems (fracture of abutment or crown, loosening of abutment screw). Modified Plaque and simplified Gingival Indices were recorded at implants and neighboring teeth, and peri-implant bone levels were radiographically determined. RESULTS: All but 1 of the 27 patients with 53 restorations could be evaluated at 1 year, and 36 restorations in 18 patients were evaluated 4 years after abutment and crown insertion. The median observation period for the reconstructions was 49.2 months. No abutment fractures occurred. Abutment screw loosening was reported for 2 restorations at 8 months and 27 months, respectively. Mean Plaque Index was 0.4 (SD 0.6) at abutments and 0.5 (SD 0.6) at teeth; mean Gingival Index was 0.7 (SD 0.5) at abutments and 0.9 (SD 0.5) at teeth. Mean marginal bone loss measured 1.2 mm (SD 0.5) after 4 years of functional loading. CONCLUSION: Zirconia abutments offered sufficient stability to support implant-supported single-tooth reconstructions in anterior and premolar regions. The soft and hard tissue reaction toward zirconia was favorable.     

Immediately restored single implants in the aesthetic zone of the maxilla using a novel design: 1-year report

Objectives: To evaluate immediate placement and immediate restoration of a novel implant with a 12°‐angled prosthodontic platform, in fresh extraction sockets of the aesthetic zone of the maxilla. Materials and methods: Tapered, roughened surface implants of 4 mm (n=15) or 5 mm (n=13) diameter were placed in 27 participants (mean age: 47.1 years; range: 21–71 years) requiring an immediate replacement of single anterior maxillary teeth. Provisional screw‐retained all‐ceramic crowns were placed within 4 h following optical impressions. At 8 weeks (baseline), definitive screw‐retained all‐ceramic crowns were placed in occlusion. Results: Twenty‐six of the 28 implants met the inclusion criteria at surgery. Marginal bone levels revealed bone gain between surgery and baseline, and between baseline and 1 year of 0.2 mm (SD 0.75) and 0.78 mm (SD 2.45). Mean mid‐buccal mucosal margins showed gains of 0.2 mm (SD 0.44). Prosthodontic maintenance and the aesthetics of the screw‐retained implant crowns were facilitated by the external hex 12°‐angled prosthodontic platform on the novel implant design, re‐orientating the access cavity to the palatal or occlusal surfaces. All‐ceramic implant crowns showed a high success rate with low maintenance issues over 1 year. Conclusion: Tapered, roughened‐surfaced implants with a novel 12°‐angled prosthodontic platform immediately placed in fresh extraction sockets, immediately restored with provisional crowns and subsequent definitive crowns at 8 weeks were successful for 1 year. To cite this article:
Brown SDK, Payne AGT. Immediately restored single implants in the aesthetic zone of the maxilla using a novel design: 1‐year report.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22 , 2011; 445–454.     

Adjacent implant-supported restorations in the esthetic zone: understanding the biology

Traditionally, when considering adjacent implants in the esthetic zone, clinicians have encountered problems associated with deficient interproximal soft tissues. These discrepancies were often solved either by fabricating restorations with long interproximal contacts or by adding pink ceramics, both of which represent an esthetic compromise in today's demanding standard of care for restorative dentistry.
This challenge has led to the recent introduction of scalloped implants. An understanding of the biology of wound healing of bone and soft tissue around implants and the remodeling process with implant-supported restorations allows the dental team to offer patients an alternative restorative solution consisting of combining conventional flat prosthetic table implants and scalloped implants.     

Immediate loading versus immediate provisionalization of maxillary single-tooth replacements: a prospective randomized study with BioComp implants.

PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective randomized study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of immediately loaded solid plasma sprayed (TPS) BioComp (BioComp Industries BV, Vught, The Netherlands) implants versus immediate provisionalized but non-loaded BioComp implants in the anterior and premolar region of the maxilla. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients (31 females and 17 males) with a mean age of 42.3+/-13.1 years (range 19 to 78 years) were included in the study. Fifty threaded TPS implants were placed and provisionalized within 24 hours after surgery. The patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups. In the immediate loaded (IL) group (n=24) the occlusion of the provisional was designed with normal contacts in centric relation and at lateral excursions, while in the non-immediate loaded (IP) group (n=24) the provisional restoration was adjusted to clear all occlusal contacts or contacts at lateral excursions. Patients were instructed to eat a soft diet and to avoid placing food in the area of the provisional crown during the first 6 weeks. Regular clinical and radiographic controls were performed and the survival rate and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were evaluated at delivery of the definitive restoration at 6 months. At 1 year, radiographic coronal bone defects and gingival esthetics between the 2 groups were assessed. RESULTS: Of the IL group, 2 fixtures were lost, while 3 implants were lost in the IP group. The failing implants showed increasing mobility at 2 to 3 weeks after insertion, and were removed. The remaining 45 implants were stable at every subsequent follow-up examination, and 6 months after implant placement, ISQ values were measured. The mean ISQ value in the IL group was 63.7+/-5.8 versus 63.2+/-4.3 for the IP group (P=.78). The mean mesial marginal bone loss after 12 months in the IL group was 0.27+/-0.2 mm versus 0.28+/-0.22 mm in the IP group (P=.9). The mean distal marginal bone loss after 12 months in the IL group was 0.19+/-0.15 mm versus 0.2+/-0.11 mm in the IP group (P=.87). All implants of the IL group had an ideal gingival buccal margin, versus 91% of the IP group. Full regeneration of the mesial interdental papilla was observed in 70% of the IL group versus 91% of the IP group, while full regeneration of the distal papilla was observed in 91% of both the IL and IP implants. CONCLUSION: No significant differences in ISQ mean values in radiographic bone loss and gingival esthetics were found between immediate non-loaded provisionalization and immediately loaded BioComp implants in the maxilla.