Le Fort I osteotomy and soft tissue response: A retrospective cohort study comparing three different techniques

The aim of this study was to evaluate the nasolabial soft tissues effects in three different Le Fort I osteotomy techniques using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) evaluation of three-dimensional (3D) volume surfaces.A retrospective study was designed, and three groups were evaluated: group 1, patients who underwent conventional Le Fort I osteotomy; group 2, patients who underwent subspinal Le Fort I osteotomy; and group 3, patients who underwent conventional Le Fort I osteotomy with ANS recontouring or removal. CBCT evaluation was performed at two time points: T0, 1 week before surgery; T1, 6 months after surgery.A total of 90 patients were enrolled in this study (group 1: 30; group 2: 30; group 3: 30). Mean maxillary advancement was 4.26 mm. For group 1, mean change in inter-alar width was 2.29 ± 1.57 mm (minimum -2mm; maximum 6.1 mm; for group 2 it was 1.20 ± 1.56 mm (minimum ?1.7 mm; maximum 5.9 mm), and for group 3 was 1.84 ± 1.76 mm (minimum ?2.3 mm; maximum 5.9 mm). For group 1, mean change in alar base width was 1.69 ± 2.32 mm (minimum ?4.8 mm; maximum 6,1 mm); in group 2 it was 0.85 ± 2.08 mm (minimum -4mm; maximum 6 mm), and group 3 was 1.21 ± 1.83 mm (minimum -2mm; maximum 5 mm). Results showed statistically significant differences in nasolabial area (P < 0.001).Within the limitations of the study it seems that subspinal Le Fort I osteotomy should be preferred when the priority is to avoid changes to the nasolabial region.     

Comparison of scleral show alterations following Le Fort I osteotomy with either maxillary impaction or lengthening

This study aimed at evaluating changes in scleral show following Le Fort I osteotomy with either impaction or lengthening of the mid face. Patients who underwent Le Fort I osteotomy were included. The patients were divided according to the direction of the movement: group 1 underwent maxillary advancement and impaction, while group 2 underwent maxillary advancement and lengthening. Standardized preoperative and 6-month postoperative photos were superimposed using Microsoft PowerPoint. The inferior visible scleral area was assessed with landmarks and measured separately using ImageJ software. Marked scleral surface area was determined using pixel count. A total of 36 consecutive patients were included. The mean maxillary advancement in the patients was 4.16 ± 2.14 mm. The mean impaction in group 1 (n= 21) was 1.06 ± 1.49 mm, while the mean vertical lengthening in group 2 (n = 15) was 1.54 ± 1.65 mm. The difference in improvement in the inferior scleral show between the groups was not statistically significant. Preoperative (180 ± 118.2 mm) and postoperative (147.75 ± 92.2 mm) scleral show significantly improved (p = 0.012) in both groups. Scleral show can be overlooked for movements under 6 mm while planning for maxillary orthognathic movement, as it improves regardless of the desired movement.     

Fractures of the atrophic, edentulous maxilla during Le Fort I osteotomy

The incidence of unfavorable fractures of the maxilla during Le Fort I osteotomy was compared between patients with atrophic, edentulous maxillae and patients with normal dentate maxillae. Unfavorable fractures frequently occurred in atrophic, edentulous maxillae. The most common maxillary fracture involved the junction of the horizontal plate of the palatine bone and posterior part of the maxilla. Prevention strategies and treatment options are discussed.     

Surgical complications of segmental Le Fort I osteotomy

Segmental maxillary osteotomy is a useful adjunct in orthognathic surgery for the correction of vertical and transverse maxillary deformities, but we know of few published reports that document complications. We evaluated the complication rates associated with segmental maxillary surgery in our unit by retrospective review of medical records, radiographs, and study models of 85 consecutive patients (mean age 23.3 years, range 14–51; male:female ratio 1:2) treated from 1995 to 2009. Types of deformity were anterior open bite (n = 30, 35%), transverse maxillary deficiency (n = 24, 28%), anterior open bite with transverse maxillary deficiency (n = 28, 33%), and anterior vertical maxillary excess (n = 3, 4%). There were 70 tripartite (82%), 13 bipartite (15%), and two quadripartite (2%) maxillas. Twenty-one patients (25%) had bone grafts. Fixation was done using titanium miniplates in 80 patients (94%), and titanium miniplates and resorbable plates in five (6%). The overall complication rate was 27%. Three patients (4%) had devitalisation of teeth, three (4%) developed minor periodontal defects, and one had tooth loss. Eight patients (9%) had plates removed, and two patients developed persistent postoperative palatal fistula. There was no segmental loss of bone or teeth. Our results show that complications in this cohort were relatively low, and that segmental maxillary surgery is safe as an adjunct in carefully selected cases.     

Le Fort Ⅰ型截骨术在唇腭裂正颌外科中的应用与评价

目的:观察分析Le Fort Ⅰ型截骨术在唇腭裂正颌外科中的应用效果.方法:回顾2004年3月至2006年12月武汉大学口腔医学院口腔颌面外科收治的唇腭裂患者的临床资料,并进行总结与分析,所有患者均进行了以Le Fort Ⅰ型截骨术为主的正颌外科治疗.结果:共收集相关病例16例,其中男9例,女7例,平均年龄22.4岁.术前∠SNA平均73.2°,术后LSNA平均79.5°;上颌前移距离平均8.13mm.平均随访时间7.3个月.所有患者术后面容改善明显,经正畸治疗后咬合关系满意.结论:以Le Fort Ⅰ型截骨术为主的正颌外科治疗,可以显著改善唇腭裂患者的颌骨与面容畸形.     

Le Fort I osteotomy using an ultrasonic bone curette to fracture the pterygoid plates

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the advantageous use of an ultrasonic bone curette and to assess the mobilization of the pterygoid process after a Le Fort I osteotomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 14 Japanese adults (ranging in age from 17 to 30 years, mean 22.4) with jaw deformities diagnosed as mandibular prognathism or bimaxillary asymmetry underwent Le Fort I osteotomy with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy or intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy. During the Le Fort I osteotomy, the Sonopet UST-2000 ultrasonic bone curette was used to fracture the pterygoid process slightly above the level of the maxillary osteotomy without damaging the descending palatine artery or other blood vessels and nerves. After surgery, the pterygoid process osteotomy and its mobility were evaluated from three-dimensional computed tomographic images. RESULTS: In all cases, the mobility of the pterygoid process could be achieved by using the device safely with minimal bleeding and no notable complications. The maxillary segment could be fixed in an ideal position and in all 14 cases, an ideal profile was achieved. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonic bone curette offers a safe procedure for performing pterygoid process fractures without damaging the surrounding tissue such as the descending palatine artery.     

Comparison between patient specific implants and conventional mini-plates in Le Fort I osteotomy with regard to infections: No differences in up to 3-year follow-up

Individually designed osteotomies and milled or printed patient-specific osteosynthesis materials are rapidly becoming a standard in maxillofacial reconstructive surgery. The benefits of using patient-specific implants (PSIs) in orthognathic surgery are especially clear in complex cases, and for this reason they are rapidly becoming common practice. We have earlier reported the benefits related to the use of PSIs as reposition and fixation system in Le Fort I osteotomy. The aim of this study was to compare complications associated with fixation with PSIs (31 patients) versus conventional mini-plates (37 patients) in Le Fort I osteotomy. No statistically significant differences in infection, reoperations or soft tissue problems were observed between the two systems used. Interestingly, three of the 37 patients in the mini-plate group underwent reoperation due to insufficient advancement or malocclusion, whereas none of the patients in the PSI group needed reoperation. In conclusion, PSIs are reliable for use in orthognathic surgery, with no signs of infection associated complications.     

Precise control of maxillary multidirectional movement in Le Fort I osteotomy using a surgical guiding device

We introduced a surgical protocol to achieve accurate maxillary multidirectional movement in Le Fort I osteotomies. This comprised a way of controlling precision and a guiding device together with prebent titanium plates. We evaluated the protocol using a semiautomated 3-dimensional assessment in 22 patients with maxillary multidirectional movement (movement in three or more of six directions). Operations were all done between October 2015 and April 2017 by the same surgeon, who followed the protocol strictly. To evaluate the accuracy, we measured the deviation of the orientation of landmarks and of the upper dentition. All cases were followed up for at least a year. They all involved maxillary movement in at least three directions, and nine involved movement in six. The guiding device was used intraoperatively in all cases. Vertical deviation of the segments of bone was often detected during removal of bone, and sagittal deviation in three cases, but we found no transverse deviations. The assessment of accuracy showed that the mediolateral, anteroposterior, and superoinferior translations of landmarks were all less than 1 mm, with mean values of 0.29, 0.43, and 0.39 mm, respectively. The pitch, roll, and yaw of the upper dentition were also less than 1°, with mean values of 0.60°, 0.35°, 0.36°, respectively. The proposed protocol allowed accurate reposition of the maxilla with multidirectional movement during Le Fort I osteotomy.     

Evaluation of Post-operative Complication Rate of Le Fort I Osteotomy: A Retrospective and Prospective Study

Le Fort I osteotomy has become a routine procedure in elective orthognathic surgery. This procedure is often associated with significant but rare post-operative complications. The study was conducted to evaluate the rate of post-operative complications following conventional Le Fort I osteotomy. Twenty-five healthy adult patients who had to undergo Le Fort I osteotomy without segmentalization of maxilla were included in the study based on indications of surgery. All the patients were followed up for a period of 6 months post-operatively to assess the rate of various post-operative complications such as neurosensory deficit, pulpal sensibility, maxillary sinusitis, vascular complications, aseptic necrosis, unfavourable fractures, ophthalmic complications and instability or non-union of maxilla, etc. The results of our study showed a post-operative complications rate of 4 %. Neurosensory deficit and loss of tooth sensibility were the most common findings during patient evaluation at varying follow-up periods while one patient presented with signs and symptoms of maxillary sinusitis post-operatively. Neurosensory as well as sinusitis recovery took place in almost all the patients within 6 months. It was concluded that thorough understanding of pathophysiological aspects of various complications, careful assessment, treatment planning and the use of proper surgical technique as well as instrumentation may help in further reducing the complication rate.     

Higher need for removal of osteosynthesis material after multi-piece versus one-piece Le Fort I osteotomy: A retrospective study of 339 patients

The aim of the present study was to identify the risk factors for removal of osteosynthesis material after multi-piece Le Fort I osteotomy compared to standard one-piece Le Fort I osteotomy (LF1).Medical files of patients treated with multi-piece or one-piece LF1 were retrospectively reviewed, including the indication for removal and time between insertion and removal. A total of 339 patients were included: 290 patients with LF1 and 49 patients with multi-piece LF1.Patients undergoing multi-piece LF1 had 2.7-times significantly higher (p < 0.001) relative risk of osteosynthesis removal in the upper jaw (42.9%) than patients undergoing LF1 (15.9%). Significant independent predictors of removal of osteosynthesis material after multi-piece LF1 were older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0–1.2; p = 0.028), simultaneous bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (OR 7.8, 95% CI 1.2–50.3; p = 0.031), and no previous surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03–0.69; p = 0.15).Significantly higher removal rates of osteosynthesis material were found after multi-piece LF1. Therefore, all patients must be informed of the higher risk for removal of osteosynthesis material when undergoing a multi-piece LF1.     

Comparison of postoperative skeletal stability of maxillary segments after Le Fort I osteotomy,using patient-specific implant versus mini-plate fixation

BackgroundThree-dimensionally (3D) designed osteotomies and customised osteosynthesis are rapidly becoming standard in maxillofacial reconstructive and deformity surgery. Patient-specific implants (PSIs) have been in use for a few years in orthognathic surgery as well. In Le Fort I osteotomy, wafer-free fixation of the maxillary segment can be performed by individually manufactured cutting and drill guides together with PSIs.AimThis retrospective study was performed to compare the postoperative skeletal stability of the maxillary segment fixed by patient-specific implants versus mini-plates after Le Fort I osteotomy.PatientsFifty-one patients were divided into subgroups according to the fixation method and the advancement of the sub-spinal point. The postoperative skeletal stability of the maxillary segment was evaluated from lateral cephalometric radiographs one year postoperatively.ResultsNo statistically significant differences were found between the postoperative skeletal stability of the PSI and mini-plate fixed maxillae. Prospective studies, possibly with 3D fusion analysis, are warranted to confirm the results.ConclusionThe choice between the two fixation methods does not seem to affect the postoperative skeletal stability of the maxillary segments.     

Precision of Le Fort I osteotomy: planning versus outcome. A multi-centre retrospective study

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of Le Fort I surgery by comparing planned surgical movements with actual outcomes.

Materials and methods: A minimum number of seven consecutive cases that had undergone a Le Fort I osteotomy procedure alone or in combination with a mandibular osteotomy from six different hospital units in the East of England between 2009 and 2010 were identified. A total of 56 cases met the inclusion criteria where surgical splints were used and model surgery had been performed. Pre- and post-operative lateral cephalograms were digitised using Dolphin^© imaging software (Version 10.0) and three cephalometric points were assessed to measure precision of surgical movements: A point (A-pt); Upper incisor tip (U1 tip); and Upper first molar occlusal point (U6 occ). The final position of the maxilla was compared to the planned position.

Results: In 71% of cases surgical movements were within 2?mm and 20% of this group were within 1?mm of the predicted position. The mean accuracy was 1.39?mm (SD 0.92?mm) for the former and 0.78?mm (SD 0.58?mm) for the latter. Accuracy correlated negatively with increased surgical complexity, particularly posterior differential impactions of the maxilla. There was no statistically significant difference between centres.

Conclusions: Pre-operative surgical planning of Le Fort I osteotomies was generally accurate. This study demonstrates that different operators across six centres produced consistent surgical outcomes and this confirms previously reported data.     

Severe unilateral scissor bite and bimaxillary protrusion treated by horseshoe Le Fort I osteotomy combined with mid-alveolar osteotomy

This report describes an orthognathic surgical case employing horseshoe Le Fort I osteotomy (HLFO) combined with mid-alveolar osteotomy and bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO) for a patient with severe unilateral scissor bite and bimaxillary protrusion. A female patient (aged 26 years, 2 months) presented with a chief complaint of dysmasesis caused by scissor bite on the right side. The clinical examination revealed difficulty in lip closure and a convex profile. Overerupted right maxillary premolars and molars and lingual tipping of the right mandibular premolars and molars were indicated before treatment. After 3 months of presurgical orthodontic treatment, two-jaw surgery involving a combination of HLFO with mid-alveolar osteotomy and BSSRO was performed. A good interdigitation in the right side was established by superior-posterior-medial movement of the dento-alveolar segment of the maxilla. Next, both the maxilla and mandible were moved superiorly and posteriorly to correct the improper lip protrusion, thereby improving the patient''s profile. Our results suggest that this new orthognathic surgery technique—achieved by combining HLFO with mid-alveolar osteotomy and BSSRO—is effective for adult patients exhibiting severe unilateral scissor bite and bimaxillary protrusion.     

Reaching the vertical versus horizontal target position in multi-segmental Le Fort I osteotomy is more difficult,but yields comparably stable results to one-segment osteotomy

This retrospective cohort study evaluated the postoperative outcomes of preoperatively planned positional changes for Le Fort I osteotomy in 77 patients (average age 26.6 years). Movement relapse and planning accuracy were evaluated by lateral cephalometric analysis, with an average follow-up of 257 days. In one-segment osteotomy cases, 73% of the horizontal movements were positioned within 2 mm of the surgical plan. With posterior–inferior repositioning of the maxilla, results fell within 2 mm of the prescribed plan in 60% of cases. Maxillary advancement and superior repositioning proved more stable than inferior maxillary repositioning. Relapse did not differ between three-piece and one-piece osteotomies for any movements; however, in three-piece cases, only half of the positional changes on average stayed within 2 mm of the prescribed surgical plan. Relapse did not vary with bone grafting among the groups. To summarize, in most Le Fort I osteotomy cases, the surgical plan is achieved within 2 mm, with posterior extrusion of the maxilla showing the greatest deviation both in reaching the target and maintaining the result achieved. Although maxillary segmentation makes the surgical plan more difficult to achieve, the results are at least as stable as those of one-piece osteotomies.     

Cranial nerve injuries in Le Fort I osteotomy: a systematic review

The aim of this systematic review was to describe the anatomical and surgical factors related to cranial nerve injuries in Le Fort I osteotomy. The protocol of this systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). Two independent reviewers performed an unrestricted electronic database search in the MEDLINE/PubMed, LILACS, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to and including August 2018. Thirty-two articles were selected for data extraction and synthesis: 30 studies were identified in the main search and two by a manual search. The level of agreement between the reviewers was considered excellent (κ = 0.779 for study selection and κ = 0.767 for study eligibility). This study revealed that the main nerve affected was the trigeminal nerve, followed by the oculomotor, abducens, optic, facial, and vagus and accessory nerves. Cleft lip and palate patients presented the highest incidence of cranial nerve damage. Cranial nerve damage after Le Fort I osteotomy is not rare. Anatomical and structural knowledge of the patient are necessary in order to minimize the risks of cranial nerve injury in Le Fort I osteotomy.     

Le Fort I 型截骨术相关骨性解剖标志的多层CT测量研究

目的:应用多层CT影像测量上颌与LeFortI型截骨手术相关骨性解剖标志,为避免损伤腭降动脉提供指导.方法:选择60例正常成人上颌多层CT扫描图像,应用efilm1.94图像处理软件测量.结果:颧牙槽嵴至翼腭管的距离平均为26mm;翼突的宽度平均为13mm;犁状孔边缘至翼腭管的距离平均为37mm;前后鼻棘的距离为47mm;犁状孔边缘至翼腭管连线与矢状面的角度为7°8'.结论:参照测量获得的解剖数据在术中能降低腭降动脉损伤的发生率.     

Immediate loading of dental implants placed in severely resorbed edentulous maxillae reconstructed with Le Fort I osteotomy and interpositional bone grafting

Background: Reconstruction and rehabilitation of atrophic maxillae with bone grafts is a lengthy and demanding procedure. This study reports the immediate loading of 50 implants placed on six extremely atrophied edentulous maxillae reconstructed with Le Fort I osteotomy and iliac bone grafting. Methods: Six patients, aged 49 to 68 years, with severely atrophied maxillae were treated with Le Fort I osteotomy and iliac bone grafting to allow for implant‐borne prosthetic rehabilitation. Four to 5 months thereafter, 50 implants (seven to 10 per patient) were placed in reconstructed maxillae and immediately functionally loaded with a screw‐retained definitive prosthesis. The patients were followed by clinical and radiographic examinations for 24 months after prosthetic loading. Results: The grafting procedure and healing period before implant placement were uneventful in all patients. Two implants were lost within 2 months after prosthesis insertion in two patients, with an overall survival rate of 96%. The prostheses success rate was 100%. At the end of the follow‐up period, all remaining implants appeared clinically healthy; crestal bone loss was >1.7 mm for six implants, resulting in a cumulative success rate of 84%. Conclusion: Immediate loading of implants placed after Le Fort I osteotomy and interpositional iliac bone grafting could be considered a viable protocol to rehabilitate extremely atrophied edentulous maxillae, considerably reducing the treatment time.     

Three-dimensional analysis of nasolabial soft tissue changes after Le Fort I osteotomy: a systematic review of the literature

A systematic review was conducted to investigate the three-dimensional (3D) effect of Le Fort I osteotomy on the nasolabial soft tissues. The literature search was conducted using the MEDLINE (accessed via PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane electronic databases until January 2018. A total of 333 studies were identified (PubMed, n = 292; Embase, n = 41; Cochrane Library, n = 0). Seventeen met the inclusion criteria. The studies were essentially retrospective. The risk of bias was considered high in 15 studies, medium in one study, and low in one study. 3D soft tissue analysis was performed at least 6 months after surgery (mean 8.3 months). The main image acquisition technique reported was cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), associated or not with 3D photography. Approximately 50% of the studies performed two-jaw surgery, 25% performed maxillary surgery only, and the other 25% included heterogeneous intervention groups. The most reported nasolabial changes were anterior and lateral movements of the nasomaxillary soft tissues and upper lip, together with anterior and superior movement of the nasal tip. The alar cinch suture and V–Y closure technique seemed to have little effect in counteracting the undesirable postoperative nasolabial changes. CBCT superimposition presented a reliable 3D assessment for simultaneous measurement of skeletal and soft tissue changes.     

Scleral exposure alterations following Le Fort I osteotomy (with and without maxillary impaction) in skeletal class III patients: A before-and-after clinical trial

Purpose

Exposure of sclera below the iris in natural head positions is aesthetically undesirable. Studies on post-surgical changes in inferior scleral exposure following orthognathic surgery are scarce and mostly retrospective. The aim of this clinical trial is to examine the effect of Le Fort I osteotomy, a procedure for correction of malocclusion and maxillo-mandibular deformities, on the inferior scleral exposure and overall scleral surface area in skeletal class III patients.

Evaluation of an interactive multi-media device for delivering information on Le Fort I osteotomy

This study was carried out on volunteers to evaluate a newly developed interactive software package aimed at informing prospective Le Fort I osteotomy patients regarding the surgical technique and possible complications. The aim of the study was to compare two methods of information delivery; a multi-media tablet device delivering both graphic and verbal information, and an audio device delivering essentially the same information in verbal form only. The null hypothesis was that there would be no difference between the efficiencies of the two methods. The subjects' ability to recall the information delivered by both devices was assessed using a questionnaire. The tablet device participants scored an average of 15.48 points, while the audio device participants scored an average of 268 points. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001), suggesting that the multi-media tablet device was more effective method.