Intraoperative multimodal analgesic bundle containing dexmedetomidine and ketorolac may improve analgesia after robot-assisted prostatectomy in patients receiving rectus sheath blocks

BackgroundMinimally invasive robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) has replaced open prostatectomy. However, RALP does not reduce postoperative pain compared to the open approach. We explored whether bundled intraoperative intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine and ketorolac reduced opioid requirements during the 24 h after RALP.MethodsEighty patients (two parallel groups) were enrolled in this prospective non-randomized study from September 2020 to November 2020. All received preoperative rectus sheath blocks for analgesia after RALP. A multimodal analgesic bundle (dexmedetomidine and ketorolac) was administered intraoperatively in the study group (n = 39) but not in the control group (n = 40). The total postoperative opioid requirements (expressed in milligrams of intravenous morphine) and pain scores (derived using a visual analog scale) were compared between the two groups up to 24 h after surgery.ResultsThe two groups were demographically similar. During surgery, patients in the study group received less remifentanil and more ephedrine than controls. The study group required significantly less opioids during the 24 h after surgery (28.3 vs. 40.0 mg, p = 0.006). The between-group pain scores differed significantly at 1 and 6 h after surgery. All other postoperative characteristics were comparable between the two groups.ConclusionsThe intraoperative multimodal analgesic bundle (intravenous dexmedetomidine and ketorolac) improved postoperative analgesia after RALP in patients with rectus sheath blocks, as evidenced by the opioid-sparing effect after surgery.     

The impact of ultrasound-guided transmuscular quadratus lumborum block combined with local infiltration analgesia for arthroplasty on postoperative pain relief

Study objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided transmuscular quadratus lumborum block (QLB) combined with local infiltration analgesia (LIA) for pain management and recovery in patients who have undergone total hip arthroplasty (THA) via a posterolateral approach.DesignThis was a prospective, randomized controlled trial.SettingWe collected data in the preoperative area, operating room, and bed ward.PatientsA total of 80 patients with American Society of Anesthesiology functional status scores of II-III were included and assigned to two groups, and all 80 patients were included in the final analysis.InterventionsAll included patients were randomly assigned to the nerve block (group N) or the control group (group C). Patients in the group N received transmuscular QLB combined with LIA, while patients in the group C received only LIA.MeasurementsThe primary outcome was postoperative pain during the first active motion: it was measured at six hours after surgery and assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes were the resting VAS scores in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and at 2, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after surgery; VAS scores during motion at 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after surgery; intraoperative consumption of opioids; postoperative consumption of morphine hydrochloride; frequency of sleep interruption due to pain on the night of surgery; time until the first “walk out of the bed” after surgery; muscle strength of the quadriceps femoris; and postoperative adverse effects.Main resultsCompared to the group C, patients in the group N had significantly lower VAS scores during motion at 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery, as well as lower resting VAS scores in the PACU and at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery. Patients in the group N also consumed significantly smaller amounts of intraoperative opioids and morphine after surgery. Patients in the group N reported significantly fewer interruptions in sleep due to pain on the night of surgery and were able to “walk out of the bed” significantly earlier than those in the group C. There was no significant difference between the two groups in muscle strength of the quadriceps femoris or incidence of postoperative adverse effects.ConclusionsCompared to treatment with LIA alone, ultrasound-guided transmuscular QLB combined with LIA can provide better postoperative pain relief and enhance the recovery of THA patients, since it does not cause quadriceps femoris muscle weakness and is associated with significantly lower need for intraoperative opioids.     

Bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion: A randomized controlled trial

Study objectiveSpinal fusion surgery is associated with severe postoperative pain. We examined whether bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block could alleviate postoperative pain in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion.DesignBlinded, randomized, controlled study.SettingTertiary university hospital, operating room, postoperative recovery room and ward.PatientsSixty patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I or II scheduled for lumbar spinal fusion surgery were randomized into the erector spinae plane block group (ESPB group) and the control group in a 1:1 ratio.InterventionsPre-operative ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block was performed in the ESPB group, while sham subcutaneous infiltration was performed in the control group.MeasurementsThe primary outcome was pain intensity at rest within 12 h postoperatively using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes included NRS pain scores at rest and on movement, postoperative opioid consumption and proportions of patients requiring opioid during the first 48 h after surgery.Main resultsThe ESPB group (n = 30) showed significantly lower pain scores at rest at 4 h after surgery (estimated mean difference − 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.4 to −0.8, p < 0.001), at 8 h (−1.3, 95% CI -1.9 to −0.6, p < 0.001), and at 12 h (−0.7, 95% CI -1.3 to −0.1, p = 0.023). The two groups showed similar pain scores at rest at 24 h after surgery (estimated mean difference − 0.2, 95% CI -0.8 to 0.5) and 48 h (−0.3, 95% CI -0.8 to 0.2). The ESPB group also showed significantly lower pain score on movement at 4 h after surgery (−1.5, 95% CI -2.5 to −0.6). The ESPB group showed a significantly smaller proportion of patients requiring sufentanil within 12 h after surgery (p = 0.020), and the group consumed significantly less sufentanil during that period (p = 0.042).ConclusionsBilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block improves postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion.     

Combination of oral clonidine and intravenous low-dose ketamine reduces the consumption of postoperative patient-controlled analgesia morphine after spine surgery

ObjectiveBecause ketamine, clonidine, and morphine modulate nociceptive pain, coadministration of these drugs would augment the activity of postoperative analgesic drugs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of coadministration of ketamine and clonidine on postoperative morphine consumption in patients after spine surgery.MethodsThe patients undergoing spine surgery were allocated randomly to one of the four study groups, which are as follows: group M (n = 12), intravenously (IV) administered patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine alone; group MK (n = 12), IV-PCA morphine plus intra- and postoperative ketamine; group MC (n = 13), IV-PCA morphine plus oral clonidine premedication; group MCK (n = 12), IV-PCA morphine plus intra- and postoperative ketamine and clonidine premedication. The patients in the MC and MCK groups received 4 μg/kg clonidine orally, whereas those in the MK and MCK groups received IV bolus of ketamine (10 mg) at a rate of 2 mg/kg/hour during anesthesia. Patients were arranged to use IV-PCA mode for administration of drugs, which was programmed to deliver a bolus dose of 2-mg morphine (groups M and MC), or boluses of 2-mg morphine and 2-mg ketamine (groups MK and MCK). Scores of visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, morphine requirement, vital signs, nausea, sedation, and other side effects were followed up to 60 hours after surgery.ResultsAlthough there were significant differences in VAS pain scores at rest 24–48 hours after the surgery, the VAS pain score at movement was similar among the groups. The number of PCA request and cumulative morphine requirement were significantly lower in the MCK group than in the M group.ConclusionThis study results show that the administration of perioperative low-dose ketamine combined with clonidine premedication could reduce the consumption of postoperative PCA morphine following spine surgery.     

Halving the usage of rigid-soled postoperative shoes does not affect outcomes in forefoot reconstruction surgery

BackgroundPostoperative shoes are commonly used after forefoot surgery. This study’s aim was to demonstrate that reducing rigid-soled shoe time to 3 weeks neither compromises functional outcomes nor does it produce complications.MethodsProspective cohort study: 6 weeks versus 3 weeks of rigid postoperative shoe (100 and 96 patients respectively), after forefoot surgery with stable osteotomies. Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) and pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were studied preoperative and one year postoperative. Radiological angles were also assessed after removing the rigid shoe and at 6 months.ResultsThe MOXFQ index and pain VAS depicted similar results in each group (group A: 29.8 and 25.7; group B: 32.7 and 23.7) with no differences between them (p = .43 Vs. p = .58). Moreover, no differences were reported in their differential angles (HV differential-angle p = .44, IM differential-angle p = .18) or in their complication rate.ConclusionIn forefoot surgery with stable osteotomies, shortening the postoperative shoe time to 3 weeks, neither impairs clinical results nor the initial correction angle.     

Periarticular multimodal drug injection does not improves early postoperative analgesia compared with continuous interscalene brachial plexus block after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A retrospective single-center comparative study

BackgroundAlthough continuous interscalene brachial plexus block (CISBPB) is common method in pain management following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR), little is known about the analgesic effects of periarticular multimodal drug injection (PMDI) for ARCR. This retrospective study sought to clarify which technique could provide the best analgesic effect after ARCR.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who underwent ARCR performed by the same surgeon at our institution between June 2016 and November 2017. Patients who underwent surgery before January 2017 received CISBPB and those who underwent surgery after February 2017 received PMDI for postoperative pain control. Both treatment groups also received fentanyl by intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA). Postoperative pain was evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h and need for IV-PCA at 8, 16, and 24 h.ResultsTwenty-eight patients received CISBPB and 21 received PMDI. According to the VAS scores, the postoperative analgesic effect was significantly better in the CISBPB group during the first 6 h (p < 0.05). Total fentanyl consumption by IV-PCA during the first 8 postoperative h was significantly greater in the PMDI group than in the CISBPB group.ConclusionsPMDI does not improve early postoperative analgesia after ARCR compared with CISBPB. CISBPB had a significantly better analgesic effect in the first 8 h postoperatively.Level of evidenceLevel III.     

Ankle block in forefoot reconstruction before or after inflation of tourniquet—Does timing matter?

BackgroundForefoot surgery causes postoperative pain frequently requiring strong painkillers. Regional blocks are now increasingly used in order to control postoperative pain especially in the first 24 h when the pain is at its worst. We conducted a prospective study to see if timing of ankle block i.e. before or after inflation of tourniquet showed any difference in efficacy in postoperative pain control in first 24 h.MethodsA prospective randomised study was conducted between September 2010 and August 2011 involving 60 patients. Group A (n = 30) had the ankle block administered after and Group B (n = 30) had a block before inflation of a thigh tourniquet. Patients were given assessment forms to chart their pain on visual analogue scale (VAS) score at 4 h and 24 h postoperatively.ResultsBoth groups demonstrated good postoperative pain control. Average VAS pain score at four and twenty fours after surgery was 2.5 and 4.5 in Group A and 3.9 and 6.3 in Group B respectively. Pain control, both at 4 and 24 h surgery was better in Group A but this was statistically significant only at 24 h.ConclusionsA regional anaesthetic ankle block should be routinely used in forefoot surgery to control postoperative pain. The ankle block should be applied after the inflation of tourniquet as this appears to provide better pain control.     

Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) following video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: Comparison of epidural PCA and intravenous PCA

ObjectivesTo compare the efficacy and side effects of epidural patient-controlled analgesia (EPCA) with those of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IVPCA) in fast-track video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lobectomy.Patients and methodsEPCA or IVPCA was chosen by patients and was started immediately following tracheal extubation in the wake of completion of VATS lobectomy. EPCA analgesia was carried out with the PCA device programmed to deliver a bolus dose of 3 mL of 0.1% bupivacaine combined with 1.2 μg/mL fentanyl, and continuous epidural infusion at a rate of 4 mL/hour through an epidural catheter placed at the T_6-7 or T_7-8 level. IVPCA was made possible by a patient controlled infusion pump programmed to deliver 0.1% morphine with a loading dose of 3 mg, and the controlled bolus of 1 mg, at a lockout interval of 5 minutes. A rescue dose of 5 mg intravenous morphine was available for all patients in postoperative care unit. Pain management was assessed with visual analog scale at rest (VAS-R) and during motion (VAS-M); side effects including nausea, vomiting, pruritus, dizziness and sleepiness were recorded and analyzed from postoperative Day 1 (POD1) to Day 3 (POD3).ResultsThis study included 105 patients. Satisfactory pain control was achieved, although 9/70 patients in the EPCA group and 5/35 patients in the IVPCA group needed rescue morphine in the recovery room. The VAS-R was significantly higher on POD1 than on POD2 or POD3 in both groups (p < 0.001). The VAS-R and VAS-M were comparable in both groups on POD1 and POD3 but significant lower VAS-M was seen in the EPCA group on POD2 (p = 0.008). Higher incidence of dizziness was found in the IVPCA group on POD1 (p = 0.044) but the EPCA group had a higher incidence of pruritus on POD2 (p = 0.024) and POD3 (p = 0.03).ConclusionOur results indicated that the necessity of pain control was higher on POD1 for VATS lobectomy. Both EPCA and IVPCA can provide an adequate, continuous and effective means for postoperative pain management and a lower VAS-M was found in EPCA on POD2.     

Application of a new serratus anterior plane block in modified radical mastectomy under ultrasound guidance: A prospective,randomized controlled trial

Study objectivesPost-operative pain is a significant concern following modified radical mastectomy in breast cancer patients. The serratus anterior plane block has recently been described as an effective technique for post-operative analgesia of modified radical mastectomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of a new serratus anterior plane (SAP) block for post-operative pain of mastectomy.DesignA randomized controlled trial.SettingSingle university teaching hospital, from October 2019 to April 2020.PatientsEighty-seven female breast cancer patients aged 30–81 years scheduled for unilateral modified radical mastectomy.InterventionsParticipants were randomly allocated to receive either general anesthesia plus SAP block (SAP block group, n = 43) or general anesthesia alone (Control group, n = 44). A single injection of 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine was administered into fascial plane between the pectoralis major and the serratus anterior in SAP block group. In the Control group, no block intervention was applied.MeasurementsThe primary outcome measure of the study was the VAS pain scores at different time-points (1, 6, 12, 24, 48 h) after modified radical mastectomy whereas the secondary outcome measures were the consumption of opioid analgesics.Main resultsBreast cancer patients in SAP block group had lower VAS pain scores compared with the Control group during the early post-operative period (1 h and 6 h after modified radical mastectomy), both at rest and with movement. In addition, the consumption of propofol was similar in two groups (P = 0.406), and the consumption of sufentanil and remifentanil in SAP block group were significantly lower than that of Control group (P = 0.000 and P = 0.000, respectively).ConclusionsSAP block significantly attenuated post-operative pain and decreased opioids consumption in breast cancer patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy.Trial registrationThis trial is registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1900026989).     

Efficacy of Two Unique Combinations of Nerve Blocks on Postoperative Pain and Functional Outcome After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective,Double-Blind,Randomized Controlled Study

BackgroundThis study aimed to explore the efficacy of two unique combinations of nerve blocks on postoperative pain and functional outcome after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsPatients scheduled for TKA were randomized to receive a combination of adductor canal block (ACB) + infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the posterior knee block (IPACK) + sham obturator nerve block (ONB) + sham lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block (LFCNB) (control group), or a combination of ACB + IPACK + ONB + sham LFCNB (triple nerve block group), or a combination of ACB + IPACK + ONB + LFCNB (quadruple nerve block group). All patients received local infiltration analgesia. Primary outcome was postoperative morphine consumption. Secondary outcomes were the time until first rescue analgesia, postoperative pain assessed on the visual analog scale (VAS), QoR-15 score, functional recovery of knee, and postoperative complications.ResultsCompared with the control group, the triple and quadruple nerve block groups showed significantly lower postoperative morphine consumption (17.2 ± 9.7 mg vs. 11.2 ± 7.0 mg vs. 11.4 ± 6.4 mg, P = .001). These two groups also showed significantly longer time until first rescue analgesia (P = .007 and .010, respectively, analyzed with Kaplan-Meier method), significantly lower VAS scores on postoperative day 1 (P < .01), significantly better QoR-15 scores on postoperative days 1 and 2 (P < .001), and significantly better functional recovery of knee including range of motion (P = .002 and .001 on postoperative days 1 and 2), and daily ambulation distance (P < .001 and P = .004 on postoperative days 1 and 2). However, the absolute change in morphine consumption, VAS scores, and QoR-15 scores did not exceed the reported minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) (morphine consumption: 10 mg; VAS scores: 1.5 at rest and 1.8 during movement; QoR-15 scores: 8.0). The MCIDs of other outcomes have not been reported in literature. The triple and quadruple nerve block groups showed no significant differences in these outcomes between each other. The three groups did not show a significant difference in complication rates.ConclusionAdding ONB or ONB + LFCNB to ACB + IPACK can statistically reduce morphine consumption, improve early pain relief, and functional recovery. However, the absolute change in morphine consumption, VAS scores, and QoR-15 scores did not exceed the MCIDs. Based on our findings and considering the sample size of this study, there is not enough clinical evidence to support the triple or quadruple nerve block use within a multimodal analgesic pathway after TKA.     

Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing open radical prostatectomy: A randomized,placebo-controlled trial

Study objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block on postoperative pain in radical prostatectomy, which leads to both visceral and somatic pain.DesignProspective, randomized, placebo controlled, double-blinded.SettingUniversity hospital.PatientsA total of ASA I-III, 50 patients aged 18–65 who were scheduled for elective open radical prostatectomy surgery.InterventionsPatients were randomly allocated to receive an ultrasound-guided ESP block, with either local anesthetic (10 mL of 1% lidocaine +10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine) or placebo bilaterally.MeasurementsThe primary outcome was morphine consumption in the first 24 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes were NRS pain scores at rest and coughing, intraoperative remifentanil consumption and need for rescue analgesic during the first 24 h after surgery.Main resultsBoth NRS scores for post-anesthesia care unit and NRS_rest scores for 1st hours were lower in Group ESPB (p < 0.001 and p = 0.033, respectively). Cumulative morphine consumption at 24 h post-surgery was similar between the groups (p = 0.447). Rescue analgesic requirement was higher in the placebo injection group than in the ESPB group at the 1st postoperative hour (p = 0.002).ConclusionsIn open radical prostatectomies, except for the first hour, ESP block is ineffective for pain scores and on morphine consumption compared to the placebo injection group in the postoperative period.     

Efficacy of Systemic Steroid Use Given One Day After Total Knee Arthroplasty for Pain and Nausea: A Randomized Controlled Study

BackgroundSystemic steroid has been used to control pain and nausea in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but most studies recommend a single dose administration prior to, or during, surgery. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of administration on 1 day postoperatively.MethodsPatients who were scheduled to undergo TKA were randomly assigned to the following groups: control group, receiving normal saline injection; group 1, receiving 10 mg dexamethasone intravenously (IV) 1 hour before surgery; group 2, receiving 0.1 mg/kg dexamethasone (IV) 24 hours after surgery; or group 3, receiving 0.2 mg/kg dexamethasone (IV) 24 hours after surgery (n = 44-46 per group). Primary outcomes were pain and nausea visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes were analgesic administration, rescue antiemetic administration, C-reactive protein, range of motion, and complications.ResultsPostoperative pain and nausea remained high for 48 hours post-TKA. Group 1 had lower pain and nausea VAS scores than did the control group (P < .01) for only 24 hours post-TKA. Groups 2 and 3 had lower pain and nausea VAS scores than did the control group and group 1 (P < .01) 48 hours post-TKA. Analgesic and antiemetic administration were significantly lower in groups 2 and 3 than in the control group during 48 hours after TKA. There were no differences in C-reactive protein level and range of motion, and complications were not detected.ConclusionThe effect of preoperative and postoperative administration of dexamethasone for controlling pain and nausea was observed only for 24 hours. Considering that severe pain and nausea persisted for more than 48 hours after TKA, additional administration of dexamethasone at 1 day postoperatively is suggested.Level of EvidenceLevel I.     

Inter-semispinal plane (ISP) block for postoperative analgesia following cervical spine surgery: A prospective randomized controlled trial

Study objectiveWe evaluated the perioperative analgesic effects of the inter-semispinal plane (ISP) block in patients undergoing posterior cervical spine surgery.DesignProspective, randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial.SettingOperating room and surgical ward.Patients60 patients aged 18–60 years of either gender, ASA I-II, undergoing elective posterior cervical spine surgery.InterventionsPatients were randomly assigned into a control group (general anesthesia only), ISP group received bilateral ultrasound guided ISP block at the level of C5 using 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25% on each side.MeasurementsVisual analog scale (VAS), intraoperative fentanyl and 24 h postoperative pethidine consumptions and time to first rescue analgesic request were documented.Main resultsThe median (quartiles) of 24 h postoperative rescue pethidine consumption was significantly lower in the ISP group [0 (0–46.25) mg] compared to that of the control group [143 (116.75–169.00) mg]; P < 0.001). VAS was significantly lower in the ISP group at 30 min, 1 h, 2 h,4 h, 6 h, 8 h and 12 h postoperative compared to control group (P < 0.05). At 18 and 24 h, VAS was not significantly different between groups. The median (quartiles) of intraoperative fentanyl consumption in the ISP group [0 (0–40.75) μg] was significantly lower compared to that of the control group [63.5 (39.5–90.25) μg]; P < 0.001]. The time to first rescue analgesic administration was significantly longer in the ISP group compared to the control group (P < 0.001).ConclusionBilateral ultrasound-guided ISP block can provide decreased 24 h postoperative analgesic consumption as well as lower pain scores in the first 12 postoperative hours in patients undergoing posterior cervical spine surgery.     

Preoperative use of gabapentin decreases the anesthetic and analgesic requirements in patients undergoing radical mastectomy

Background/aimGabapentin is an anticonvulsant drug that is safe and effective for the treatment of neuropathic pain syndrome, as well as postoperative pain with good results. This prospective randomized study was done to evaluate the effects of preoperative administration of oral gabapentin (1200 mg) on the intraoperative fentanyl and isoflurane consumption, postoperative analgesic requirements and postoperative pain in patients undergoing radical mastectomy.MethodsSixty ASA I and II patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups to receive oral gabapentin 1200 mg, 2 h before surgery (G group) or control (C group). General anesthesia was induced and maintained at bispectral index value between 40 and 60. During surgery the end-tidal isoflurane concentrations required to maintain adequate depth of anesthesia and the required incremental doses of intraoperative fentanyl were recorded. Postoperative pain was assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS) at rest for 24 h. Postoperatively, whenever visual analogue scale (VAS) was more than 5 or on patients’ demand, analgesia in both groups was provided with diclofenac sodium (1 mg/kg IM) or tramadol hydrochloride (1 mg/kg IV) as needed. VAS, analgesics requirements, and side-effects were assessed for 24 h postoperatively.ResultsIntraoperative fentanyl and postoperative analgesic consumption were significantly lower in G group than C group (P < 0.001). Patients in the G group had significantly lower end-tidal concentrations of isoflurane required to maintain adequate depth of anesthesia (P < 0.05). VAS was significantly lower in G group than C group at the first three measurement times (P < 0.01). The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was significantly lower in G group than C group (30% versus 60% of patients, respectively, P < 0.05). The incidence of dizziness was significantly higher in the G group than C group (26% versus 3.3% of patients, respectively, P < 0.05).ConclusionGabapentin (1200 mg) administered orally 2 h before surgery decreased the intraoperative fentanyl and isoflurane consumption, postoperative analgesic requirements, postoperative pain, and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, but increased dizziness.     

Effectiveness of Periarticular Injection After Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty for Displaced Femoral Neck Fracture in Elderly Patients: A Double Blinded Randomized,Controlled Study

BackgroundBipolar hemiarthroplasty is a standard treatment for displaced femoral neck fracture in elderly with a normal acetabulum. Several studies have shown controversial results regarding postoperative visual analogue scale, opioid consumption, and the effectiveness of periarticular injection in hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is going to identify the effectiveness of periarticular injection after bipolar hemiarthroplasty compared with the patients treated with conventional pain control.MethodsA prospective, randomized, controlled study was performed for displaced femoral neck fracture in elderly who underwent bipolar hemiarthroplasty from 2017 to 2019. Patients were classified into two groups: Periarticular injection (PAI) group and nonperiarticular injection (non-PAI) group. All patients were recorded pain score (VAS) during admission. Morphine usage was collected in both groups including its side effects.ResultsThere was no difference in demography, intraoperative parameters, ambulatory status, and length of stay in both groups. Postoperative VAS at 8,16, 24, 60 hours, and before discharge in the non-PAI group was significantly higher than the PAI group (P = .001, P = .006, P = .002, P = .003, and P = .001, respectively). Morphine consumption at 8 hours after surgery was significantly higher in the non-PAI group than the PAI group (P = .001).ConclusionsIntraoperative, periarticular injection may be used as an adjunctive pain management in bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture in elderly.Level of Evidencelevel I, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.     

The analgesic efficacy of iPACK after knee surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

Study objectiveThe novel infiltration between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee (iPACK) has been described to relieve posterior knee pain after knee surgery. The study objective is to determine whether iPACK provides analgesia after knee surgery when compared with a control group.DesignSystematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.SettingOperating room, postoperative recovery area and ward, up to 24 postoperative hours.PatientsPatients scheduled for knee surgery under general or spinal anaesthesia.InterventionsWe searched five electronic databases for randomized controlled trials comparing iPACK with a control group.MeasurementsThe primary outcome was rest pain score scores on a visual analogue scale (VAS) of 0–10 at 12 h postoperatively, analysed according to the nature of surgery (total knee arthroplasty vs. anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction) and the use of multimodal analgesia. Secondary outcomes included rest and dynamic pain scores, intravenous morphine-equivalent consumption at 2 h and 24 h, and functional outcomes including ambulation distance and range of motion at discharge.Main resultsSix trials involving 687 patients were included, all of which received total knee arthroplasty only. When compared with a control group, iPACK significantly reduced rest pain scores at 12 h, with a mean difference (95% CI) of −1.0 (−1.5 to −0.5), I² = 93%, p = 0.0003, without subgroup differences for postoperative multimodal analgesia (p = 0.15). Secondary pain outcomes were inconsistently improved with iPACK. Functional outcomes were either similar between groups or had clinically unimportant differences. The overall quality of evidence was moderate.ConclusionsThere is moderate level evidence that iPACK might provide analgesia for posterior pain after total knee arthroplasty when compared with a control group at 12 h, but was not associated with any other meaningful benefits. Based on these results, there is currently limited evidence supporting the use of iPACK as a complement to adductor canal block for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty.     

Pre-emptive multimodal analgesic bundle with transversus abdominis plane block enhances early recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BackgroundAs postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy may delay recovery and discharge, a multimodal and pre-emptive analgesic approach is necessary. This study demonstrated that a multimodal analgesic bundle improves postoperative recovery, using the Quality of Recovery-40K (QoR-40K) questionnaire during the first 24 h after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.MethodsIn this prospective non-randomized study with two parallel groups, 80 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were allocated into either the multimodal analgesia group or the conventional analgesia group. The multimodal analgesia group received a pre-emptive analgesic bundle (preoperative intravenous administration of paracetamol, ketorolac, and dexamethasone, and a posterior approach to the transversus abdominis plane block), while the conventional analgesia group did not. The primary outcome was the QoR-40K score during the first 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes were the peak visual analog scale pain score at rest and the incidence rates of rescue analgesic use and nausea/vomiting during the first 24 h after surgery.ResultsThe QoR-40K score was higher in the multimodal analgesia group than in the conventional analgesia group (196 [190–199] vs. 182 [172–187], p < 0.001). The peak visual analog scale pain score was significantly lower in the multimodal analgesia group than in the conventional analgesia group. Multimodal analgesia also reduced the incidence rates of rescue analgesic use and postoperative nausea/vomiting (22.5% [95% CI, 9.6–35.4%] vs. 55.0% [39.6–70.4%], p = 0.003), compared to conventional analgesia.ConclusionsMultimodal analgesia significantly improves the quality of early postoperative recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, as shown by the QoR-40K score.     

Intra-articular injection versus interscalene brachial plexus block for acute-phase postoperative pain management after arthroscopic shoulder surgery

BackgroundThe minimally invasive approach of arthroscopic shoulder surgery is beneficial; however, for optimal outcomes, perioperative pain management is essential. This cross-sectional study aimed to examine the analgesic effectiveness of intra-articular injection (IA) versus interscalene brachial plexus block (ISPB) among patients treated with arthroscopic shoulder surgeries.MethodsWe reviewed 100 consecutive patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopic surgery, of whom 50 each underwent IA (February 2019─January 2020; IA group) and ISPB (October 2018─July 2019; ISPB group). The primary outcome was the postoperative pain score measured using a Wong–Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale preoperatively and at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively. We performed multiple regression analysis to examine whether IA/ISPB selection is associated with acute-phase postoperative pain and adjusted for intra-articular injection, interscalene brachial plexus block, postoperative pain management, arthroscopic shoulder surgery, IA with 10 mg of morphine previously reported prognostic factors for postoperative pain (e.g., surgical procedures, operative time, older age, and preoperative pain). Furthermore, we examined induction time, total pentazocine dosage, and total postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) events.ResultsThere were no significant differences between the IA and ISPB groups in perioperative pain control during the acute-phase periods (p = 0.12, repeated analysis of variance). The difference in anesthesia method was not a prognostic factor for acute-phase postoperative pain (p = 0.11). The IA group (15.06 ± 4.00 min) had a significantly shorter mean anesthesia induction time than the ISPB group (29.23 ± 9.22 min) (p = 0.0001). There was no significant between-group difference in the total pentazocine dosage during the first 7 days (p = 0.3934) postoperatively. PONV was observed in eight (17.0%) and two (4.2%) patients in the IA and ISPB groups, respectively. There was no significant between-group difference in the PONV incidence (p = 0.1582).ConclusionsThere was no significant difference in acute-phase postoperative pain management between the IA and ISPB groups. The induction time was significantly shorter in IA.IRBApproval number: UOEHCRB20-078, IRB approval date: September 9th, 2020; study duration: October 2018 to January 2020.     

The predictive significance of bone mineral density on postoperative pain relief in knee osteoarthritis patients after total knee arthroplasty: A prediction model

BackgroundBone mineral density (BMD) may be an important factor affecting the clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, further information regarding BMD in postoperative pain relief is not present yet. This study aims to gain further insight into the predictive significance of BMD in postoperative pain relief in knee osteoarthritis (KOA) patients after TKA.Methods156 KOA patients treated by TKA were included in this study. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to measure the pain intensity in patients within one year after TKA. The patients were divided into good pain relief group (the improvement of VAS ≥ 3) and poor pain relief group (the improvement of VAS < 3). BMD and other clinical characteristics were also collected. Logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) were used to evaluate the predictive significance of BMD. Subgroup analysis was used to compare the difference of postoperative pain between High BMD group and Low BMD group extra.Results34 (21.8%) patients had poor pain relief after TKA. Logistic regression analysis indicated that age, BMD, preoperative hospital for special surgery (HSS) scores, preoperative VAS score and postoperative posterior slope angles (PSA) were the risk factors of poor pain relief (P < 0.05). Using BMD as a predictor, the optimum cut-off value of poor pain relief was T-level = ?3.0 SD in the ROC curve, where sensitivity and specificity were 73.5% and 83.7%, respectively. Based on this cut-off value, obvious pain relief was observed in the High BMD group compared with Low BMD group from the 6th month after TKA in the subgroup analysis (P < 0.05).ConclusionsBMD is an effective predictor for postoperative pain relief in KOA patients after TKA, and the poor pain relief should be fully considered especially when BMD T-level ≤ ?3.0 SD.