<Superscript>18</Superscript>F-FDG PET/CT and 3.0-T whole-body MRI for the detection of distant metastases and second primary tumours in patients with untreated oropharyngeal/hypopharyngeal carcinoma: a comparative study

Purpose  

The aim of this prospective study was to compare the diagnostic value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and 3.0-T whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) for the assessment of distant metastases and second primary cancer (SPC) in patients with untreated oropharyngeal or hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OHSCC).     

Breast cancer detection using high-resolution breast PET compared to whole-body PET or PET/CT

Purpose

To compare the performance characteristics of positron emission mammography (PEM) with those of whole-body PET (WBPET) and PET/CT in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

Methods

A total of 178 women consented to PEM for presurgical planning in an IRB-approved protocol and also underwent either WBPET (n?=?69) or PET/CT (n?=?109) imaging, as per usual care at three centers. Tumor detection sensitivity, positive predictive values, and ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake were compared between the modalities. The effects of tumor size, type, and grade on detection were examined. The chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare distributions between groups, and McNemar’s test was used to compare distributions for paired data within subject groups, i.e. PEM versus WBPET or PEM versus PET/CT.

Results

The mean age of the women was 59?±?12 years (median 60 years, range 26–89 years), with a mean invasive index tumor size of 1.6?±?0.8 cm (median 1.5 cm, range 0.5–4.0 cm). PEM detected more index tumors (61/66, 92 %) than WBPET (37/66, 56 %; p?<?0.001) or PET/CT (95/109, 87 % vs. 104/109, 95 % for PEM; p?<?0.029). Sensitivity for the detection of additional ipsilateral malignancies was also greater with PEM (7/15, 47 %) than with WBPET (1/15, 6.7 %; p?=?0.014) or PET/CT (3/23, 13 % vs. 13/23, 57 % for PEM; p?=?0.003). Index tumor detection decreased with decreasing invasive tumor size for both WBPET (p?=?0.002) and PET/CT (p?<?0.001); PEM was not significantly affected (p?=?0.20). FDG uptake, quantified in terms of maximum PEM uptake value, was lowest in ductal carcinoma in situ (median 1.5, range 0.7–3.0) and invasive lobular carcinoma (median 1.5, range 0.7–3.4), and highest in grade III invasive ductal carcinoma (median 3.1, range 1.4–12.9).

Conclusion

PEM was more sensitive than either WBPET or PET/CT in showing index and additional ipsilateral breast tumors and remained highly sensitive for tumors smaller than 1 cm.     

Evaluation of integrated whole-body PET/CT in the detection of recurrent ovarian cancer

PURPOSE: To assess the usefulness and reliability of integrated whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients in whom recurrent ovarian cancer is suspected. METHODS: Integrated whole-body PET/CT imaging was performed in 19 patients with suspected ovarian cancer recurrence. CT, PET and fused PET/CT images were evaluated separately and imaging results were compared with pathological findings and clinical follow-up after 6 months. RESULTS: Of the 19 patients studied, 11 were found to have recurrent cancer. In 8 of these 11 patients, recurrence was diagnosed by CT, PET and fused PET/CT. In the remaining three patients, only PET and PET/CT showed a recurrent tumour, while CT was negative. Twelve localisations of ovarian cancer recurrence could be detected by CT, 17 by PET and 18 by PET/CT. In one patient with pulmonary metastases in CT and in the CT component of PET/CT, PET was negative. In the case of three metastases in the diaphragm, the spleen and the thoracic wall, respectively, the determination of the exact localisation was only possible by fused PET/CT. CONCLUSION: In patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, PET/CT detects more lesions than PET or CT alone. PET/CT permits the exact anatomical localisation of pathologic tracer uptake and can thus direct further treatment to the precise site of tumour recurrence. Hence, PET/CT should be considered for follow-up of patients with ovarian cancer.     

全身MRI/DWI影像融合恶性肿瘤检出的诊断正确性与PET/CT的对照性研究

目的与PET/CT对照,前瞻性评价全身T2加权(wbT2)、全身扩散加权成像(wbDWI)与wbT2/wbDWI融合影像对恶性肿瘤检出的诊断正确性。方法 64例病人[男44例,     

Diagnostic accuracy of whole-body MRI/DWI image fusion for detection of malignant tumours: a comparison with PET/CT

Objective

To prospectively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of whole-body T2-weighted (wbT2), whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (wbDWI) and wbT2/wbDWI image fusion for malignant tumour detection compared with PET/CT.

Methods

Sixty-eight patients (44 men; 60?±?14?years) underwent PET/CT for staging of malignancy and were consecutively examined by 1.5-Tesla MRI including wbT2 and wbDWI. Two radiologists independently assessed wbDWI, wbT2, wbT2 + wbDWI (side-by-side) and wbT2 + wbDWI + wbT2/wbDWI image fusion for the presence of malignancy. PET/CT served as a reference standard.

Results

PET/CT revealed 374 malignant lesions in 48/64 (75%) patients. Detection rates and positive predictive value (PPV) of wbT2 and wbDWI alone were 64% and 84%, and 57% and 93%, respectively. Detection rates and PPV of wbT2 and wbDWI for side-by-side analysis without and with fused images were 72% and 89%, and 74% and 91%, respectively. The detection rate was significantly higher with side-by-side analysis and fused image analysis compared with wbT2 and wbDWI alone (p?=?.0159; p?<?.0001). There was no significant difference between fused image interpretation and side-by-side analysis.

Conclusions

WbDWI allows detection of malignant lesions with a similar detection rate to wbT2. Side-by-side analysis of wbT2 and wbDWI significantly improves the overall detection rate and fused image data provides no added value.     

Comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI in breast cancer patients: Lesion detection and quantitation of 18F-deoxyglucose uptake in lesions and in normal organ tissues

Purpose

To compare the performance of PET/MRI imaging using MR attenuation correction (MRAC) (DIXON-based 4-segment -map) in breast cancer patients with that of PET/CT using CT-based attenuation correction and to compare the quantification accuracy in lesions and in normal organ tissues.

Methods

A total of 36 patients underwent a whole-body PET/CT scan 1 h after injection and an average of 62 min later a second scan using a hybrid PET/MRI system. PET/MRI and PET/CT were compared visually by rating anatomic allocation and image contrast. Regional tracer uptake in lesions was quantified using volumes of interest, and maximal and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmax and SUVmean, respectively) were calculated. Metabolic tumor volume (MTV) of each lesion was computed on PET/MRI and PET/CT. Tracer uptake in normal organ tissue was assessed as SUVmax and SUVmean in liver, spleen, left ventricular myocardium, lung, and muscle.

Results

Overall 74 FDG positive lesions were visualized by both PET/CT and PET/MRI. No significant differences in anatomic allocation scores were found between PET/CT and PERT/MRI, while contrast score of lesions on PET/MRI was significantly higher. Both SUVmax and SUVmean of lesions were significantly higher on PET/MRI than on PET/CT, with strong correlations between PET/MRI and PET/CT data (ρ = 0.71–0.88). MTVs of all lesions were 4% lower on PET/MRI than on PET/CT, but no statistically significant difference was observed, and an excellent correlation between measurements of MTV with PET/MRI and PET/CT was found (ρ = 0.95–0.97; p < 0.0001). Both SUVmax and SUVmean were significantly lower by PET/MRI than by PET/CT for lung, liver and muscle, no significant difference was observed for spleen, while either SUVmax and SUVmean of myocardium were significantly higher by PET/MRI. High correlations were found between PET/MRI and PET/CT for both SUVmax and SUVmean of the left ventricular myocardium (ρ = 0.91; p < 0.0001), while moderate correlations were found for the other normal organ tissues (ρ = 0.36–0.61; p < 0.05).

Conclusions

PET/MRI showed equivalent performance in terms of qualitative lesion detection to PET/CT. Despite significant differences in tracer uptake quantification, due to either methodological and biological factors, PET/MRI and PET/CT measurements in lesions and normal organ tissues correlated well. This study demonstrates that integrated whole-body PET/MRI is feasible in a clinical setting with high quality and in a short examination time.     

全身MRI与PET/CT在淋巴瘤骨髓浸润诊断及预后中的作用

淋巴瘤是一种血液系统恶性肿瘤。淋巴瘤骨髓浸润(BMI)使疾病分期上升至IV期, 是疾病进展、预后较差的标志。常规部位的骨髓活检(BMB)具有创伤性, 且检出率低。PET/CT与全身MRI的出现, 丰富了BMI的检测手段。PET/CT与全身MRI对于淋巴瘤, 尤其是侵袭性淋巴瘤BMI均具有较高的检出率, 二者孰高孰低, 尚未定论。对于红骨髓、良性骨髓病变(炎症等)、淋巴瘤BMI病灶以及肿瘤治疗后骨髓的变化与骨髓残留或复发病灶, 全身MRI很难区分, 而PET/CT却可以很好地鉴别这些病灶。但是, PET/CT存在电离辐射; 对于惰性淋巴瘤的BMI, 超出PET/CT分辨率的病灶, 可能出现假阴性; 某些情况会限制PET/CT的使用, 包括18F-FDG生理性摄取量可能发生改变的正常组织、18F-FDG摄取相关性炎症、高血糖或高胰岛素血症导致的18F-FDG分布的改变、肿瘤患者治疗后出现的骨髓活化等。然而, 这些情况可以使用全身MRI。因此, 全身MRI和PET/CT相辅相成, 优势互补, 但二者均不能代替BMB。对于常规BMB阴性, 但影像学提示阳性的患者, 在影像学引导下进行BMB, 可以提高BMI的检出率。另外, 全身MRI阳性的淋巴瘤BMI患者与全身MRI阴性的淋巴瘤BMI患者相比, 前者预后可能较差。     

Standardized uptake values for [F] FDG in normal organ tissues: Comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI

Purpose

To compare maximum and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmax/mean) of normal organ tissues derived from [¹⁸F]-fluoro-desoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) using MR attenuation correction (MRAC) (DIXON-based 4-segment μ-map) with [¹⁸F]-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) using CT-based attenuation correction (CTAC).

Methods and materials

In 25 oncologic patients (15 men, 10 women; age 57 ± 13 years) after routine whole-body FDG-PET/CT (60 min after injection of 290 ± 40 MBq [¹⁸F]-FDG) a whole-body PET/MRI was performed (Magnetom Biograph mMR™, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). Volumes of interest of 1.0 cm³ were drawn in 7 physiological organ sites in MRAC-PET and the corresponding CTAC-PET images manually. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated to compare MRAC- and CTAC based SUV values; Wilcoxon-Matched-Pairs signed ranks test was performed to test for potential differences.

Results

The mean delay between FDG-PET/CT and PET/MRI was 92 ± 18 min. Excellent correlations of SUV values were found for the heart muscle (SUVmax/mean: R = 0.97/0.97); reasonably good correlations were found for the liver (R = 0.65/0.72), bone marrow (R = 0.42/0.41) and the SUVmax of the psoas muscle (R = 0.41). For subcutaneous fat, the correlation coefficient was 0.66 for SUVmean (p < 0.05). Correlations between MRAC and CTAC were non-significant for SUVmean of the psoas muscle, SUVmax of subcutaneous fat, SUVmax and SUVmean of the lungs, SUVmax and SUVmean of the blood-pool. The median SUVmax and SUVmean in MRAC-PET were lower than the respective CTAC values in all organs (p < 0.05) but heart (SUVmax) and the bone marrow (SUVmean).

Conclusion

In conclusion, in oncologic patients examined with PET/CT and PET/MRI SUVmax and SUVmean values generally correlate well in normal organ tissues, except the lung, subcutaneous fat and the blood pool. SUVmax and SUVmean derived from PET/MRI can be used reliably in clinical routine.     

MRI and PET/CT of patients with bone metastases from breast carcinoma

3.0Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was compared with combined 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with suspected bone metastases from breast cancer. A prospective clinical study was performed in 13 female breast cancer patients (mean age 61years; range 45-85 years). The spine was imaged in the sagittal plane with T1-weighted (T1), short tau inversion recovery (STIR), and T2-weighted fat-saturated (T2) sequences. The pelvis was imaged similarly in the coronal plane. Axial DWI was performed from the skull base to the mid-thigh. MRI and PET/CT were performed in all patients at a maximum interval of 10 working days and at least 14 days after chemotherapy. MRI was reviewed by two radiologists, and their consensus on potential metastases in 27 predefined locations was recorded. The predefined locations were the vertebral bodies (24), the left (1) and right (1) pelvic bones, and the sacral bone (1). The PET/CT was reviewed by a radiologists and a nuclear medicine physician. MRI detected 59 of the 60 active metastases found with our gold standard modality PET/CT. T1 had the highest sensitivity (98%) but rather low specificity (77%), but with the addition of STIR and DWI, the specificity increased to 95%. The additional metastases detected with MRI most likely represented postherapeutic residual scars without active tumour. In conclusion, 3.0Tesla MRI with T1, STIR, and DWI is useful for the clinical evaluation of bone metastases from breast cancer and compares well to PET/CT.     

Comparison of lesion detection and quantitation of tracer uptake between PET from a simultaneously acquiring whole-body PET/MR hybrid scanner and PET from PET/CT

Purpose

PET/MR hybrid scanners have recently been introduced, but not yet validated. The aim of this study was to compare the PET components of a PET/CT hybrid system and of a simultaneous whole-body PET/MR hybrid system with regard to reproducibility of lesion detection and quantitation of tracer uptake.

Methods

A total of 46 patients underwent a whole-body PET/CT scan 1?h after injection and an average of 88?min later a second scan using a hybrid PET/MR system. The radioactive tracers used were ¹⁸F-deoxyglucose (FDG), ¹⁸F-ethylcholine (FEC) and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE (Ga-DOTATATE). The PET images from PET/CT (PET_CT) and from PET/MR (PET_MR) were analysed for tracer-positive lesions. Regional tracer uptake in these foci was quantified using volumes of interest, and maximal and average standardized uptake values (SUV_max and SUV_avg, respectively) were calculated.

Results

Of the 46 patients, 43 were eligible for comparison and statistical analysis. All lesions except one identified by PET_CT were identified by PET_MR (99.2?%). In 38 patients (88.4?%), the same number of foci were identified by PET_CT and by PET_MR. In four patients, more lesions were identified by PET_MR than by PET_CT, in one patient PET_CT revealed an additional focus compared to PET_MR. The mean SUV_max and SUV_avg of all lesions determined by PET_MR were by 21?% and 11?% lower, respectively, than the values determined by PET_CT (p?<?0.05), and a strong correlation between these variables was identified (Spearman rho 0.835; p?<?0.01).

Conclusion

PET/MR showed equivalent performance in terms of qualitative lesion detection to PET/CT. The differences demonstrated in quantitation of tracer uptake between PET_CT and PET_MR were minor, but statistically significant. Nevertheless, a more detailed study of the quantitative accuracy of PET_MR and the factors governing it is needed to ultimately assess its accuracy in measuring tissue tracer concentrations.