Recovery of FEV1 after histamine challenge in asthmatic children

Factors that influence the time necessary for complete recovery of FEV₁ after inhaling histamine were analysed in forty-five children with asthma. These included the initial bronchial obstruction (baseline FEV₁), the provocation dose of histamine producing a 20% fall in FEV₁ (PD₂₀) and the fall in FEV₁ after the histamine challenge. In addition it was also investigated whether a second challenge carried out after complete recovery of FEV₁ would produce a reproducible PD₂₀-histamine value. The time for complete recovery varied widely from 15 to more than 75 min. The time needed for complete recovery of FEV₁ after the histamine challenge seems to be mainly determined by the PD₂₀ value. The other factors such as initial bronchial obstruction and the fall in FEV₁ after the challenge showed no significant relationship with the recovery time. A second challenge with histamine resulted in a highly reproducible PD₂₀ value. The clinical implication of this study is that other tests can only be performed when FEV₁ has returned to 95% of baseline.     

Eosinophil activity markers in peripheral blood have high predictive value for bronchial hyperreactivity in patients with suspected mild asthma

The present study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of eosinophils and markers of their activity for bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) in a population of patients with recently developed clinical symptoms of asthma. The activation of eosinophils was estimated by measuring eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in serum. In addition, flow cytometry was used to measure the expression of the EG2-epitope on intracellular ECP in eosinophils from peripheral blood. Twenty-eight consecutive patients with clinical history of asthma were studied. Of the 28 patients, 18 had a positive bronchial challenge test measured as PD₂₀≤ 1600 μg histamine. A significantly higher concentration of eosinophils and a trend to higher ECP in the peripheral blood was found in the hyperreactive group than in the nonreactive group. However, the intracellular expression of ECP did not correlate with the PD₂₀ value, and no significant difference between the groups was found. With one eosinophil activity marker, either serum ECP or EG2, BHR could be predicted in 70% of the patients. If we combined any two of the activity markers (serum ECP, EG2, or the percentage of eosinophils), the predictive value increased to 100%. We conclude that the blood eosinophil concentration, as well as, to some extent, serum ECP, has a high specificity for BHR in patients with recently developed clinical symptoms of asthma. Despite normal bronchial reactivity, some patients had signs of activated eosinophils, i.e., high serum ECP and increased EG2 expression. Thus, these markers may reflect early stages in the development of BHR. Our results also indicate that a combined evaluation of percentage of eosinophils and of eosinophil activity markers is of clinical value to predict BHR.     

Predictors of early- and late-phase reactions to bronchial allergen challenge

The influence of inhaled steroids and predictive factors on the response to bronchial allergen challenge (BCA) was evaluated in. 80 asthmatics allergic to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Der p). All underwent BCA with Der p and measurement of early (EAR) and late asthmatic reaction (LAR). The cumulative dose of allergen producing 20% fall in FEV₁, in the EAR (PD₂₀) was calculated. Bronchial histamine provocation, conjunctival provocation test (CPT), and skin prick test with Der p extract were performed. Specific IgE to Der p in serum (RAST), blood eosinophil (EOS) count, serum eosinophil cationic protein, and eosinophil protein X were measured. Thirty patients (38%) were treated with inhaled steroids. All patients had at least a 20% fall in FEV₁ in EAR. Some 42% of nonsteroid- and 33% of steroid-treated patients had LAR with fall in peak flow of at least 20%. For patients not treated with steroid, 35% of variation in PD₂₀ was explained by RAST and histamine reactivity, and 53% of variation of observed PD₂₀ could be predicted. The baseline FEV₁, EOS, and EAR explained 28% of variation in LAR, and 28% of variation in observed LAR could be predicted. For patients treated with steroids, 38% of variation in PD₂₀ was explained by EOS and histamine reactivity, and only 18% of variation of observed PD₂₀ could be predicted. For patients treated with steroids, it was impossible to predict LAR. We conclude that to achieve a quantitative estimation of allergen-specific EAR and LAR, BCA cannot be replaced by the tests used in this study. Treatment with inhaled steroids modifies the response to BCA, making quantitative prediction of EAR less accurate and prediction of the magnitude of LAR impossible.     

Plasma histamine and bronchial reactivity in allergic asthma

Histamine is an important mediator of allergic inflammation and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), a hallmark of asthma. Studies on the relationship between plasma histamine and BHR in allergic asthmatic patients have yielded controversial results. We therefore measured plasma histamine and bronchial reactivity in 30 nonsmoker volunteers taking no medication. Eleven were normal subjects; 19 were stable, mildly allergic asthmatic patients. Venous blood was taken to measure blood cells and basal plasma histamine by radioimmunoassay. After blood sampling, all subjects underwent a measurement of PC₂₀M (concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV₁). Mean plasma histamine levels were 0.21 ± 0.1 ng/ml and 0.44 ± 0.3 ng/ml in normal and asthmatic subjects, respectively (P<0.05). We found a significant increase of blood eosinophils and basophils in asthmatic patients, and a positive correlation between plasma histamine and circulating basophils. PC₂₀M was greater than 16 mg in normal volunteers, and mean PC₂₀M was 2.1 ± 2 mg/ml in asthmatic patients. PC₂₀M did not correlate with plasma histamine levels, but it did so negatively with blood eosinophils. The increased plasma histamine concentration in mildly atopic asthmatic patients might be a consequence of the high basophil releasability of atopies and the higher basophil counts in allergic asthma. Plasma histamine is thus unlikely to be a determinant of BHR in asthma.     

Serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) as a marker of disease activity and treatment efficacy in seasonal asthma

This study was carried out to determine whether serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) represents a sensitive marker for disease activity in atopic asthmatic patients during the pollen season. The study, in double-blind fashion, was performed between February and June 1994. Two groups of 10 seasonal asthmatic patients randomly received two different treatments. The first group was treated with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 500 μg bid; the second received a matched placebo (P). At the beginning and every month, blood samples for determination of ECP and eosinophil count were collected and lung function (FEV₁) and methacholine responsiveness (PD₂₀) were performed. Subjects recorded daily symptoms of asthma, salbutamol consumption, and peak expiratory flow (PEF) values. In the P group, all indices, except FEV₁, showed significant changes during the pollen season ( P < 0.001). In the BDP group, significant changes were detected for symptom score ( P < 0.01), salbutamol consumption ( P < 0.01), and eosinophil number ( P < 0.05). Between the two groups, significant differences for symptom score ( P < 0.001), salbutamol consumption ( P < 0.001), ECP levels ( P < 0.05), eosinophil count ( P < 0.02), PD₂₀ methacholine ( P < 0.02), and PEF values ( P < 0.01) were detected. Changes in serum ECP significantly correlated with changes in other parameters ( P < 0.001), except FEV₁. Our results provide evidence that serum ECP is a sensitive marker for monitoring of the disease activity in seasonal asthma. Furthermore, it may offer a useful tool for estimating treatment efficacy.     

Effect of nedocromil on bronchospasm induced by inhalation of substance P in asthmatic subjects

Several studies have demonstrated that neuropeptides are present in peptidergic fibres of bronchial tissue. The aim of the present study was to evaluate in vivo the effect of nedocromil sodium (2 × 2 mg) on bronchospasm induced by inhalation of substance P. Six moderate asthmatic patients, mean age 25.17 years, were studied. Airway response was measured as FEV₁ and the dose of substance P (using a dose range of 23–736 nmol) producing a 20% decrease in FEV₁ (PD₂₀) was calculated from the individual semilogarithmic dose-response curves. Patients were studied on 3 separate days in a randomized, double-blind manner. On the first day a baseline PD₂₀ value was determined. On subsequent days substance P challenge was performed after pretreatment (20 min before challenge) with either placebo or nedocromil sodium. Student's paired t -test and Wilcoxon's test were used for statistical analysis. The results of this study demonstrated that inhalation of substance P causes a dose-dependent bronchoconstriction and that the bronchoconstriction induced by substance P can be prevented by pre-treatment with nedocromil sodium.     

Impact of allergic rhinitis on asthma: effects on bronchial hyperreactivity

Background:  Remarkable relationship exists between upper and lower airways. Bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) is a paramount feature of asthma and may be considered a strong risk factor for the onset of asthma in patients with allergic rhinitis.
Objective:  This study is aimed at evaluating the presence of BHR in a large group of patients with moderate-severe persistent allergic rhinitis alone, and at investigating possible risk factors related to severe BHR.
Methods:  Three hundred and forty-two patients with moderate-severe persistent allergic rhinitis were prospectively and consecutively evaluated. Clinical examination, skin prick test, spirometry and bronchial methacholine (MCH) test were performed in all patients.
Results:  Twenty-two (6.4%) patients had severe BHR, 74 (21.6%) patients had mild BHR and 192 (56.2%) had borderline BHR; 54 (15.8%) patients had a negative MCH test. The logistic regression analysis evidenced that trees and house dust mites sensitization (OR_Adj: 8.1), rhinitis duration > 5 years (OR_Adj: 5.4) and FEV₁ ≤ 86% of predicted (OR_Adj: 4.0) were significantly associated with severe BHR. The discriminative ability of this model is appreciably satisfactory, being the AUC = 0.90.
Conclusion:  This study highlights the close link between upper and lower airways and the role of some risk factors, such as tree and mite sensitization, > 5-year duration, and ≤ 86% FEV₁ values, as risk factors for severe BHR in patients with moderate-severe persistent allergic rhinitis alone. Therefore, BHR is frequently present in patients with chronic rhinitis and should be suspected in the presence of defined risk factors.     

Studies on histamine metabolism in allergen-induced asthma

The excretion of histamine (Hi) and its metabolite methythistamine (MeHi)was determined in separated fractions of urine up to 12h alter standardized allergen provocations in 18 adult patients wild defined extrinsic bronchial asthma. The main histamine metabolite, methylimidazoleacetic acid (MelmAA), was measured in six of the patients.
After positive provocations (decrease in FEV₁ > 20%) the excretion of Hi was significantly increased during 3h and that of MeHi during 4h after challenge. Negative provocations (decrease in FEV₁ <20%) were not followed by any changes in the excretion of Hi and MeHi. MelmAA excretion increased in five out of six patients after positive provocation. It was calculated that the increased excretion of Hi and its metabolites after a positive provocation corresponded to a release of about 1 mg histamine in the body or about 1 μg/g lung tissue if all histamine was liberated in the lung.
Pretreatment with two anti-allergic drugs, disodium cromoglycate and ICI 74.917, giving significant allergen protection, resulted in a smaller increase of the excretion of both Hi and MeHi, indicating an inhibition of histamine release in vivo.     

Role of symptoms and lung function in determining asthma control in smokers with asthma

Background:  Cigarette smoking in asthma increases the severity and accelerates the decline in lung function. The relative role of symptoms and lung function in determining asthma control in smokers with asthma is not known.
Aim of the study:  The aim of this study was to compare asthma control in smokers vs never-smokers with asthma, using the validated Juniper asthma control questionnaire (ACQ), and assess if any difference was because of a particular symptom or the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁) value.
Methods:  This was a cross-sectional study of 134 asthmatics (74 never-smokers and 60 smokers) with ≥15% reversibility in FEV₁ after salbutamol. All subjects completed the ACQ, recording FEV₁ and asthma symptoms (night awakening, morning symptoms, dyspnoea, wheeze, activity limitation and use of reliever inhaler).
Results:  Compared with the never-smokers, smokers with asthma had significantly worse median (IQR) total asthma control score [1.6 (1.1–2.3) vs 2.8 (1.7–3.4); ( P  < 0.0001)] and in each of the six individual symptom question scores ( P  < 0.001), but no difference in FEV₁ levels ( P  = 0.908).
Conclusion:  Asthma control is significantly worse in asthmatics who smoke compared with never-smokers, with all symptoms related to asthma control uniformly worse in smokers, independent of FEV₁.     

Smoke exposure interacts with ADAM33 polymorphisms in the development of lung function and hyperresponsiveness

Introduction:  ADAM33 is the first identified asthma gene by positional cloning, especially asthma combined with bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR). Moreover, ADAM33 is associated with early-life lung function and decline of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) in the general population. In utero and postnatal cigarette smoke exposure (CSE) are associated with reduced lung function, and development of BHR and asthma. We hypothesized that this may occur via interaction with ADAM33.
Aim:  To replicate the role of ADAM33 in childhood lung function and development of BHR and asthma. Furthermore, we investigated gene–environment interaction of ADAM33 with in utero and postnatal CSE in the Dutch PIAMA cohort.
Methods:  Six ADAM33 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were genotyped. Rint was measured at age 4 and 8 years, FEV₁ and BHR at age 8 years; asthma was based on questionnaire data at age 8.
Results:  In the total cohort, the rs511898 A, rs528557 C, and rs2280090 A alleles increased the risk to develop asthma (+BHR). There existed interaction between in utero but not postnatal CSE and the rs528557 and rs3918396 SNPs with respect to development of BHR, the rs3918396 SNP with Rint at age 8 and the rs528557 SNP with FEV₁% predicted.
Conclusions:  We confirm associations between ADAM33 and the development of asthma (+BHR). This is the first study suggesting that interaction of in utero CSE with ADAM33 results in reduced lung function and the development of BHR, which needs further confirmation.     

Airway inflammation in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with special emphasis on the antigen-presenting dendritic cell: influence of treatment with fluticasone propionate

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the airways characterized by variable airflow limitation and airway hyperresponsiveness. The type of inflammatory response in asthma is compatible with a major contribution of professional antigen-presenting cells. The airways in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are also markedly inflamed; however, the predominant types of inflammatory cells and the main anatomical site of the lesion appear to differ from those in asthma. COPD is characterized by reduced maximum expiratory flow and slow forced emptying of the lungs. Steroids are the most prominent medication used in the treatment of asthma and COPD; however, the beneficial effect of steroid treatment in COPD is subject of debate. We investigated the efficacy of fluticasone propionate (FP) treatment in atopic asthmatics and in COPD patients with bronchial hyperreactivity who smoke. The effect of the treatment on bronchial hyperreactivity and indices of the methacholine dose–response curve were analysed, as well as indices of inflammation of the airway mucosa with special emphasis on the antigen presenting dendritic cell. Treatment of allergic asthmatic patients resulted in improvement of lung function (FEV₁), a decrease in bronchial hyperresponsiveness and a decrease of maximal airway narrowing. During the FP-treatment of COPD patients, FEV₁ remained stable, while FEV₁ deteriorated significantly in the placebo group. Therefore, steroid treatment may have a beneficial effect in COPD patients with bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR). Since immunohistochemical analysis of bronchial biopsy specimens from asthma and COPD patients show disease-specific aspects of inflammation, the anti-inflammatory effect of FP is obtained through modulation of different cell populations in asthma and COPD.     

High-dose inhaled steroids in the management of asthma A comparison of the effects of budesonide and beclomethasone dipropionate on pulmonary function, symptoms, bronchial responsiveness and the adrenal function

Svendsen UG, Frølund L, Heinig JH, Madsen F, Nielsen NH, Weeke B. High-dose inhaled steroids in the management of asthma. A comparison of the effects of budesonide and beclomethasone dipropionate on pulmonary function, symptoms, bronchial responsiveness and the adrenal function.
The efficacy of budesonide (800 μg b.d.) and beclomethasone dipropionate (750 μg b.d.) in controlling the symptoms of asthma, pulmonary function, bronchial responsiveness to histamine, and adrenal function, was assessed in a double-blind, double-dummy cross-over study of 36 adult chronic asthmatic patients. The patients, the majority of whom were assessed to be affected to a severe degree, were insufficiently controlled in their current regimen of inhaled steroids and/or inhaled and oral bronchodilators. A 2 weeks baseline period preceded 6 weeks of treatment with each of the study drugs. Both treatment groups showed improvements from baseline in clinical assessment of lung function carried out after the first 6 weeks of treatment. No significant differences were seen throughout the entire 12 weeks study, when comparing the effects of the treatments on FEV₁ FVC, PEF or the histamine PC₂₀. Asthma severity, symptom score and inhaled bronchodilator use showed the same results after both treatments. It is concluded that inhalations of budesonide and beclomethasone dipropionate in high doses are equally potent in the treatment of severe asthma. There is no significant influence on the adrenal function and no significant side effects during a period equal to that of the present study.     

Effect of ethanol on airway caliber and nonspecific bronchial responsiveness in patients with alcohol-induced asthma

No study has investigated the effects of ethanol on bronchial responsiveness in patients with alcohol-induced asthma, although acetaldehyde, which is a metabolite of ethanol and is thought to be a main factor in alcohol-induced asthma, causes both bronchoconstriction and bronchial hyperresponsiveness. The purpose of this study was to investigate the direct action of ethanol on the airway in patients with alcohol-induced asthma. First, we investigated the bronchial response to inhalation of ascending doses (5, 10, and 20%) of ethanol in nine patients with alcohol-induced asthma. Then, the bronchial responsiveness to methacholine was measured in 14 patients who were pretreated with saline or 20% ethanol in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover fashion. Ascending doses of inhaled ethanol caused no significant changes in FEV₁. The methacholine concentrations producing a 20% fall in FEV₁ (PC₂₀-MCh) after 20% ethanol (0.769 mg/ml, GSEM 1.514) were significantly ( P = 0.0357) higher than those after saline (0.493 mg/ml, GSEM 1.368). This indicates that ethanol has a reducing effect on nonspecific bronchial responsiveness in patients with alcohol-induced asthma; this paper is the first report on the effects of ethanol on bronchial responsiveness.     

Comparison of the effects on bronchial hyperresponsiveness of antiallergic agents and beclomethasone dipropionate in long-term bronchial asthma

The effect of antiallergic agents (DSCG (disodium cromoglycate), ketotifen, and ibudilast) and beclomethasone dipropionate inhaler (BDI) on bronchial hyperresponsiveness to histamine inhalation was retrospectively assessed in 72 asthmatic patients with more than a year's duration of the disease. Decrease in bronchial hyperresponsiveness to histamine was observed in 10 out of the 33 (30%) antiallergic-agents-treated patients (group A, mean duration = 7.8 months), in 12 of 19 (63.2%) BDI-treated patients (group B, 6.2 months), but only 2 of the 20 (10%) control patients (group C, 7.8 months). Improvement of histamine PC₂₀ was from 310 to 597 μg/ml ( P <0.01) in group A, from 308 to 1622 μg/ml ( P <0.0005) in group B, and from 575 to 525 μg/ml (NS) in group C. A significant decrease in the peripheral eosinophil count was observed only in group B. The improvement in bronchial hyperresponsiveness was parallel with that of asthmatic symptoms; the percentage of patients becoming symptom-free rose from 12 to 42%, 5 to 89%, and 5 to 20% in groups A, B, and C, respectively. Out of 11 unimproved patients in group A, 7 showed a significant improvement in their histamine PC₂₀ by BDI treatment (mean PC₂₀: 311 → 1828 μg/ml). These results suggest that BDI might be more effective than antiallergic agents in the treatment of patients with long-standing bronchial asthma.     

Comparison of four different measures of bronchial responsiveness in asthmatic children

Although several tests are available to assess the presence and severity of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), there is no agreement on the most appropriate stimulus. The most commonly used stimuli are methacholine, histamine, and exercise. Daily peak expiratory flow (PEF) variation has been reported to correlate with the severity of BHR, and in recent years this has been widely used because of its noninvasiveness and ease of performance. This study was carried out to determine the relationship among these four commonly used measures of bronchial responsiveness in asthmatic children. For this purpose, 12 asthmatic children of varying disease severity were recruited. Subjects underwent three challenges on 3 separate days in 1 week. During the week preceding the challenges (methacholine, histamine, and exercise), patients recorded PEF three times a day. All patients had PC₂₀ less than 8 mg/ml with methacholine and histamine. Patients with PC₂₀ greater than 3.5 mg/ml for both methacholine or histamine had negative exercise challenges. The strongest correlation was between histamine and methacholine ( r =0.95). Exercise-induced bronchospasm had substantial and significant correlation with the other three measures. No significant correlation was observed between PEF variability and histamine or methacholine. The varying degrees of relationships among the four commonly used measures suggests that each method yields information on different but related phenomena. More than one measure may be required to detect the different aspects of asthmatic bronchial responsiveness.     

Comparative study of the effects of nedocromil sodium (4 mg) and sodium cromoglycate (10 mg) on adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic subjects

The effect of nedocromil sodium (4 mg; 7.8 × 10⁻⁶ m ) on adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction was compared with that of a higher dose of sodium cromoglycate (10 mg; 24.1 × 10⁻⁶ m ). Eleven allergic asthmatic patients (mean age 26.28 ± 12.21 years) were studied. Adenosine (0.03–4.00 mg) was administered as nebulized aerosol. The dose of adenosine producing a 20% change in FEV₁(PD₂₀) was calculated from the individual semi-logarithmic dose-response curves. Patients were studied on 4 separate days. On the first day the adenosine challenge was performed; on subsequent days patients were pretreated (20 min before challenge) with either placebo or test drug (nedocromil sodium 2 × 2 mg or sodium cromoglycate 2 × 5 mg) administered by pressurized aerosol in a randomized, double-blind manner. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way analysis of variance. Neither sodium cromoglycate nor nedocromil sodium showed a significant bronchodilator effect. In patients treated with placebo, inhalation of adenosine produced a dose-related bronchoconstriction with a geometric mean PD₂₀ of 0.42 mg. After drug administration the mean PD₂₀ values were 1.29 mg with sodium cromoglycate and 2.30 mg with nedocromil sodium. Both drugs produced a significant increase in mean PD₂₀ value in comparison with placebo and baseline ( P < 0.01). These results demonstrate that nedocromil sodium (4 mg) is significantly more potent than a larger dose of sodium cromoglycate (10 mg) in inhibiting adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction ( P < 0.05).     

Inhaled lysine acetylsalicylate (L-ASA) attenuates histamine-induced bronchoconstriction in asthma

When administered by inhalation, histamine provokes dose-related bronchoconstriction in asthmatic subjects mainly by a direct activation of histamine H1-receptors on airway smooth muscle. However, little is known of the change in airway responsiveness to histamine after cyclooxygenase blockade. The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of the potent cyclooxygenase inhibitor, lysine acetylsalicylate (L-ASA), administered by inhalation on histamine-induced bronchoconstriction in a group of 16 asthmatic subjects. The subjects studied attended the laboratory on four separate occasions to receive nebulized L-ASA (solution of 90 mg/ml) or matched placebo (glycine solution of 30 mg/ml) 15 min before bronchoprovocation tests with histamine and methacholine in a randomized, double-blind order. Changes in airway caliber were followed as forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁), and agonist responsiveness was expressed as the provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV₁ from baseline (PC₂₀). Administration of both L-ASA and glycine solution caused a small but significant acute fall in FEV₁ from baseline, which returned to normal within 15 min. When compared to placebo, inhaled L-ASA reduced the airway responsiveness to histamine in 13 of the 16 subjects studied, the geometric mean (range) values for PC₂₀ histamine increasing significantly ( P < 0.001) from 1.72 (0.13–5.49) mg/ml to 3.31 (0.36–12.00) mg/ml after placebo and L-ASA, respectively. No significant change in airway responsiveness to methacholine was recorded after L-ASA. Acute administration of L-ASA by inhalation protects the asthmatic airways against histamine-induced bronchoconstriction, thus suggesting that endogenous prostaglandins may play a contributory role in the airways response to histamine in human asthma.     

Measurement of serum levels of eosinophil cationic protein to monitor patients with seasonal respiratory allergy induced by Parietaria pollen (treated and untreated with specific immunotherapy)

This trial studied the behavior of a marker of eosinophilicc inflammation, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), in the peripheral blood of two groups of subjects with seasonal allergic respiratory symptoms (rhinitis and mild bronchial asthma) induced by pollen allergens of Parietaria judaica (P.j.) (One group treated and another untreated with specific immunotherapy [SIT], to determine what contribution these serial measurements might provide, in comparison with various other tools now available for pollinosis monitoring. In a previously randomized order, we selected 25 patients with monitoring. In a previously randomized order, we selected 25 patients with monosensitization to P.j. pollen allergens: among them, 12 had started SIT with a P.j. extract in autumn 1993. As a control group, 13 patients were untreated. All patients were studied with various tests at four different times: time I - November 1993; time II - February 1994; time III - end of May 1994; and lime IV - September 1994. Blood samples for determination of serum HOP were collected at each time. Methacholine challenge tests were performed at times I and III. A pollen count was also carried out. A statostocally significant difference ( P < 0.05) was observed in mean ECP levels at times I and II in SIT treated and untreated patients The interaction between groups and time was not significant. No statistically significant difference was found between PD₂₀ FEV₁ values at times I and III in either group. After I year of treatment, we did not find any effect of SIT on bronchial hyperresponsiveness or on ECP Serum values.     

Testing bronchial hyper-responsiveness: provocation or peak expiratory flow variability?

BACKGROUND: Assessing bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR) is a main diagnostic criterion of asthma. Provocation testing is not readily available in general practice, but peak expiratory flow (PEF) is. Several guidelines promote the use of PEF variability as a diagnostic tool for BHR. This study tested the agreement between histamine challenge testing and PEF variability, and the consequences for diagnosing asthma. AIM: To investigate the possibility of assessing BHR by PEF variability, using a histamine provocation test as a reference. METHOD: Subjects with signs of symptoms indicating asthma (persistent or recurrent respiratory symptoms or signs of reversible bronchial obstruction) (n = 323) were studied. They had been identified in a population screening for asthma. A histamine provocation test and PEF variability were assessed over a three-week period. Asthma was defined as signs or symptoms together with a reversible airflow obstruction or BHR to the histamine challenge test. BHR was defined as a PC20 histamine of < or = 8 mg/ml or a PEF variability of > or = 15%. Overall correlation between PC20 and PEF variability was calculated using Spearman's rho. Furthermore, a decision tree was constructed to clarify the role of BHR in diagnosing asthma. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients had a reversibility in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of > or = 9% predicted, 131 patients showed a PC20 of < or = 8 and 11 patients had a PEF variability of > or = 15%. Overall correlation was poor at only -0.27 (P < 0.0001). One hundred and fourteen of the 131 patients diagnosed as having asthma when the histamine challenge test was used were not diagnosed by PEF variability. CONCLUSION: PEF variability cannot replace bronchial provocation testing in assessing BHR. This indicates that PEF variability and bronchial provocation do not measure the same aspects of BHR. If BHR testing is required in diagnosing asthma, a bronchial provocation test has to be used in general practice as well.     

Relationship between oxidative stress-related biomarkers and antioxidant status with asthma and atopy in young adults: a population-based study

Background and aim Enhanced oxidative stress has been described in adults who suffer from symptoms of asthma and poor lung function. This study assessed the relation between markers of oxidative stress and antioxidant status and lung function, symptoms of asthma, atopy and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) in young adults.
Methods A sub-sample of 589 individuals aged 22–28 years, selected from a total of 1232 included in a survey assessing early and current risk factors for chronic diseases, participated in the study. Participants were from an agricultural area of Chile, responded to a Spanish version of the European Community Respiratory Health Survey questionnaire, were skin tested to eight allergens, and challenged with methacholine to assess BHR. Five hundred and eighty-five individuals had measures of plasma biomarkers ferric reducing ability of plasma, uric acid, protein carbonyls and 564 had 8-iso-prostaglandin F_2α (8-iso-PGF_2α) assessed.
Results All participants had detectable plasma 8-iso-PGF_2α and carbonyl levels. There was no indication for an association between markers of antioxidant status or oxidative stress with any of the outcomes studied.
Conclusion The levels of oxidative stress-related biomarkers and antioxidant status in plasma may not be related to asthma in the general population in the absence of more severe symptoms or exacerbations.