Solid splenic masses: evaluation with 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Our objective was to assess the role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of solid splenic masses in patients with a known malignancy and in incidentally found lesions in patients without known malignancy. METHODS: Two groups of patients were assessed: (a) 68 patients with known malignancy and a focal lesion on PET or a solid mass on CT portions of the PET/CT study; and (b) 20 patients with solid splenic masses on conventional imaging without known malignancy. The standard of reference was histology (n = 16) or imaging and clinical follow-up (n = 72). The lesion size, the presence of a single versus multiple splenic lesions, and the intensity of (18)F-FDG uptake expressed as a standardized uptake value (SUV) were recorded. The ratio of the SUV in the splenic lesion to the background normal splenic uptake was also calculated. These parameters were compared between benign and malignant lesions within each of the 2 groups of patients and between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in differentiating benign from malignant solid splenic lesions in patients with and without malignant disease were 100%, 100%, 100%, and 100% versus 100%, 83%, 80%, and 100%, respectively. In patients with known malignant disease, an SUV threshold of 2.3 correctly differentiated benign from malignant lesions with the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 100%, 100%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. In patients without known malignant disease, false-positive results were due to granulomatous diseases (n = 2). CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET can reliably discriminate between benign and malignant solid splenic masses in patients with known (18)F-FDG-avid malignancy. It also appears to have a high NPV in patients with solid splenic masses, without known malignant disease. (18)F-FDG-avid splenic masses in patients without a known malignancy should be further evaluated as, in our series, 80% of them were malignant.     

Accuracy of PET for diagnosis of solid pulmonary lesions with 18F-FDG uptake below the standardized uptake value of 2.5.

Benign and malignant pulmonary lesions usually are differentiated by 18F-FDG PET with a semiquantitative 18F-FDG standardized uptake value (SUV) of 2.5. However, the frequency of malignancies with an SUV of <2.5 is significant, and pulmonary nodules with low 18F-FDG uptake often present diagnostic challenges. METHODS: Among 360 consecutive patients who underwent 18F-FDG PET to evaluate pulmonary nodules found on CT, we retrospectively analyzed 43 who had solid pulmonary lesions (excluding lesions with ground-glass opacity, infiltration, or benign calcification) with an SUV of <2.5. The uptake of 18F-FDG was graded by a visual method (absent, faint, moderate, or intense) and 2 semiquantitative methods (SUV and contrast ratio [CR]). Final classification was based on histopathologic findings or at least 6 mo of clinical follow-up. RESULTS: We found 16 malignant (diameter, 8-32 mm) and 27 benign (7-36 mm) lesions. When faint visual uptake was the cutoff for positive 18F-FDG PET results, the receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) analysis correctly identified all 16 malignancies and yielded false-positive results for 10 of 27 benign lesions. Sensitivity was 100%, specificity was 63%, and the positive and negative predictive values were 62% and 100%, respectively. When an SUV of 1.59 was the cutoff for positive 18F-FDG PET results, the ROC analysis revealed 81% sensitivity, 85% specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 77% and 89%, respectively. At a cutoff for positive 18F-FDG PET results of a CR of 0.29, the ROC analysis revealed 75% sensitivity, 82% specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 71% and 85%, respectively. The areas under the curve in ROC analyses did not differ significantly among the 3 analyses (visual, 0.84; SUV, 0.81; and CR, 0.82). Analyses of intra- and interobserver variabilities indicated that visual and SUV analyses were quite reproducible, whereas CR analysis was poorly reproducible. CONCLUSION: These results suggested that for solid pulmonary lesions with low 18F-FDG uptake, semiquantitative approaches do not improve the accuracy of 18F-FDG PET over that obtained with visual analysis. Pulmonary lesions with visually absent uptake indicate that the probability of malignancies is very low. In contrast, the probability of malignancy in any visually evident lesion is about 60%.     

18F-FDG PET/CT显像在肾上腺转移瘤中的诊断价值和预测分析

目的探讨18F-FDG PET/CT显像在肾上腺转移瘤中的诊断价值及预测价值。方法回顾性分析2012年12月至2016年10月行PET/CT检查的95例无症状的肾上腺病变患者,分为肾上腺转移瘤组（40例）和肾上腺良性病变组（55例）,分别测量肾上腺病灶大小、CT值、最大标准化摄取值（SUV_max）、肾上腺病灶SUV_max/肝脏本底SUV_max比值（SUV_max比值）,分别进行单因素检验、独立样本t检验、Mann-Whitney U秩和检验统计分析。采用多因素Logistic回归分析肾上腺转移瘤的危险预测因素,并采用受试者工作特征（ROC）曲线分析确定肾上腺转移瘤与良性病变鉴别诊断的最佳临界点。结果110个肾上腺病灶中良性病变60个,转移瘤50个,大小为0.65~5.70 cm,平均（1.65±0.82）cm。CT值-20.4~46.8 HU,平均（24.2±14.9）HU。SUV_max为1.1~31.9,平均4.5±4.6。SUV_max比值为0.44~14.5,平均1.99±2.15。单因素分析得出两者在病灶大小、CT值、SUV_max、SUV_max比值之间的差异均有统计学意义（Z=-4.908、-6.030、-7.966、-8.252,均P < 0.001）;多因素Logistic回归分析显示SUV_max比值是影响肾上腺转移瘤发生的独立因素,ROC曲线分析得出SUV_max比值=1.24为鉴别诊断肾上腺转移瘤与良性病变的最佳临界点,灵敏度和特异度分别为90.0%和93.3%。结论18F-FDG PET/CT显像对肾上腺转移瘤具有较高的诊断价值。SUV_max比值是肾上腺转移瘤的独立危险预测因素,鉴别诊断肾上腺良性病变与转移瘤的SUV_max比值最佳临界点为1.24。     

Focal thyroid lesions incidentally identified by integrated 18F-FDG PET/CT: clinical significance and improved characterization.

In this retrospective study, we investigated whether the (18)F-FDG uptake pattern and CT findings improved the accuracy over the standardized uptake value (SUV) for differentiating benign from malignant focal thyroid lesions incidentally found on (18)F-FDG PET/CT. We also defined the prevalence of these lesions and their risk for cancer. METHODS: (18)F-FDG PET/CT was performed on 1,763 subjects without a previous history of thyroid cancer from May 2003 to June 2004. Two nuclear medicine physicians and 1 radiologist interpreted PET/CT images, concentrating on the presence of focal thyroid lesions, the maximum SUV of the thyroid lesion, the pattern of background thyroid (18)F-FDG uptake, and the CT attenuation pattern of the thyroid lesion. RESULTS: The prevalence of focal thyroid lesions on PET/CT was 4.0% (70/1,763). Diagnostic confirmation was done on 44 subjects by ultrasonography (US)-guided fine-needle aspiration (n = 29) or US with clinical follow-up (n = 15). Among 49 focal thyroid lesions in these 44 subjects, 18 focal thyroid lesions of 17 subjects were histologically proven to be malignant (papillary cancer in 16, metastasis from esophageal cancer in 1, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in 1). Therefore, the cancer risk of focal thyroid lesions was 36.7% on a lesion-by-lesion basis or 38.6% on a subject-by-subject basis. The maximum SUV of malignant thyroid lesions was significantly higher than that of benign lesions (6.7 +/- 5.5 vs. 10.7 +/- 7.8; P < 0.05). When only the maximum SUV was applied to differentiate benign from malignant focal thyroid lesions for the receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) of PET was 0.701. All 16 focal thyroid lesions with very low attenuation or nonlocalization on CT images, or with accompanying diffusely increased thyroid (18)F-FDG uptake, were benign. When those lesions were regarded as benign lesions, irrespective of the maximum SUV, the AUC of PET/CT was significantly improved to 0.878 (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Focal thyroid lesions incidentally found on (18)F-FDG PET/CT have a high risk of thyroid malignancy. Image interpretation that includes (18)F-FDG uptake and the CT attenuation pattern, along with the SUV, significantly improves the accuracy of PET/CT for differentiating benign from malignant focal thyroid lesions.     

Characterization of the normal adrenal gland with 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Prior studies have documented increased (18)F-FDG adrenal activity in both benign and malignant pathologic conditions. When whole-body PET imaging is performed without CT anatomic coregistration, however, the normal adrenal gland is difficult to recognize. The purpose of this study was to investigate the normal adrenal appearance and standardized uptake value (SUV) using (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging. METHODS: Twenty patients with lymphoma with normal-appearing adrenal glands on prior CT examination (less than a 5% pretest likelihood of adrenal involvement) were studied. PET/CT imaging was performed 2 h after intravenous administration of (18)F-FDG. Unenhanced CT scans were acquired for attenuation correction and anatomic coregistration. PET images were reconstructed using an ordered-subsets expectation maximization algorithm and were corrected for body weight, dose, and radioactive decay. Ability to confirm visualization of the adrenal glands was determined for (18)F-FDG PET alone and for (18)F-FDG PET/CT by a consensus of 2 readers, and uptake of (18)F-FDG in the adrenal gland was compared with liver activity and scored visually (0 = no visualization, 1 = activity less than in liver, 2 = activity equal to liver activity, and 3 = activity greater than in liver). RESULTS: The 2 readers agreed on visualization of the adrenal glands with PET alone for 2 of 40 (5%) glands. With PET/CT, the readers agreed on visualization of 27 of 40 (68%) adrenal glands. Visual scores for normal adrenal activity ranged from 0 to 3, and maximum SUVs ranged from 0.95 to 2.46. Visual scoring of adrenal activity correlated well with both mean and maximal SUV (mean SUV vs. visual score: slope = 0.96, r = 0.88; maximum SUV vs. visual score: slope = 0.99, r = 0.87). CONCLUSION: PET/CT permits more reliable visualization of normal adrenal glands than does PET alone. Visual assessment of adrenal uptake correlates well with SUV measurement, and readers of PET/CT need to be aware of the wide range of normal adrenal uptake.     

Differentiating adrenal adenomas from nonadenomas using (18)F-FDG PET/CT: quantitative and qualitative evaluation

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the ability of (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) PET/CT to distinguish adrenal adenomas from nonadenomas in patients with suspected malignancy. METHODS: Fifty-nine adrenal masses were evaluated with coregistered (18)F-FDG PET (PET/CT). Two reviewers independently graded uptake of (18)F-FDG by visual inspection of the adrenal mass in comparison to liver and background. CT attenuation value of the adrenal mass and the standardized uptake value (SUV) of the mass, liver, background, and primary neoplasm (when visible) were measured. Mean SUVs of the adrenal mass, liver, and background and ratios of the SUVs were calculated. RESULTS: Of 47 adenomas, 43 measured <10 HU on unenhanced CT. Of 12, 12 nonadenomas measured >10 HU on unenhanced CT. Using qualitative assessment of FDG activity in the adrenal mass compared with liver, adenomas were less than, equal to, or more active than the liver in 51%, 38%, and 10%, respectively. Nonadenomas were less than, equal to, or more active than liver in 0%, 25%, and 75%, respectively. The mean SUV of adenomas (4.2) was significantly lower (P = .002) than that of their primary malignancies (9.2) but not that of liver (4.3). The mean SUV of adenomas was not significantly different than that of nonadenomas (5.2), but the mean adrenal/liver ratio (1.0) for the adenomas was significantly lower (P = .006) than that of the nonadenomas (2.1). CONCLUSION: Adrenal adenomas were better differentiated from nonadenomas using unenhanced CT measurements in combination with ratios of the SUVs. Adrenal mass activity, which was visibly less than liver, was more specific for adenoma, whereas adrenal mass activity visibly greater than liver was more specific for malignancy.     

Diagnostic usefulness of FDG PET for pancreatic mass lesions

The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of [18F]2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with a pancreatic mass by comparing the results with those of X-ray computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. METHODS: Eighty-six patients with pancreatic lesions, included 65 malignant tumors and 21 benign masses (55 masses were proven histologically and the others were diagnosed clinically), were studied. The diagnostic factors of CT and MR imaging were evaluated, and those of FDG PET were also evaluated for malignant and benign masses by visual interpretation and quantitative interpretation with the standardized uptake value (SUV) and SUVgluc which was designed to reduce the effects of a high blood sugar level. Visual interpretations were evaluated only in FDG PET images, and quantitative interpretations were evaluated by referring to CT and/or MR imaging. The correlation between SUV and the degree of histological differentiation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma was investigated. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy for CT imaging were 91, 62, 88, 68 and 84%, and for MR imaging 78, 70, 88, 54 and 76%, respectively. In visual interpretation of FDG PET images, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy were 82, 81, 93, 59 and 81%, respectively. Significant differences between malignant and benign lesions existed in SUV and SUVgluc (p < 0.0001, each). With the cutoff value of SUV as 2.1 and SUVgluc as 2.2, the accuracy of diagnosis was maximal. With that cutoff value, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy for SUV were 89, 76, 92, 70 and 86%, and for SUVgluc 91, 76, 92, 73 and 87%, respectively. The sensitivity and NPV of SUVgluc were higher than those of SUV, which suggests that SUVgluc may be more useful in reducing the number of overlooked malignant tumors. The specificity and PPV of FDG PET were superior to those of CT and MR imaging. There were no significant differences between the SUVs of moderately differentiated adenocarcinomas and those of well differentiated adenocarcinomas. CONCLUSION: To improve the diagnostic procedure for classifying masses, FDG PET with not only SUV but also SUV corrected by the blood sugar level is required in addition to morphological diagnosis by CT and/or MR imaging.     

双时相18F-FDG PET显像用于肿瘤良恶性鉴别诊断

目的探讨双时相^18F-FDG PET显像在肿瘤良恶性鉴别中的临床价值。方法52例单次显像难以鉴别病变性质的患者行双时相全身^18 F-FDG PET／CT显像，将显像结果与病理学检查结果对照。结果43例延迟显像SUV升高的患者中有39例经病理检查证实为恶性病变，4例为良性病变；9例延迟显像SUV降低的患者中有7例经病理检查证实为良性病变，2例为恶性病变。灵敏度为95．1％，准确性为88．5％，特异性为63．6％，阳性预测值为90．7％，阴性预测值为7／9例。结论双时相^18F—FDG PET对良恶性病变的鉴别具有较高的灵敏度和准确性。     

18F-FDG PET/CT显像诊断心包恶性病变的价值

目的 评价18F-脱氧葡萄糖（FDG）PET/CT对心包恶性病变的诊断价值.方法 对23例心包积液患者进行18F-FDG PET/CT显像,并采用两独立样本非参数检验分析良恶性病灶最大标准摄取值（SUVmax）差异有无统计学意义.结果 经病理检查证实恶性心包积液14例,良性心包积液9例.1例PET/CT假阴性,2例PET/CT假阳性.18F-FDG PET/CT鉴别诊断良恶性心包积液的灵敏度、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为92.9%（13/14）、7/9、87.0%（20/23）、86.7%（13/15）和7/8.良、恶性病变的SUVmax中位值分别为2.2和6.0,两者间比较差异有统计学意义（z=-3.279,P=0.001）.结论 18F-FDG PET/CT是评价心包恶性病变较好的无创性手段,对良恶性心包积液的诊断与鉴别诊断有一定临床价值.     

The role of 18F-FDG PET in staging and early prediction of response to therapy of recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are gaining the interest of researchers because of impressive metabolic response to the targeted molecular therapeutic drug imatinib mesylate. Initial reports suggest an impressive role for (18)F-FDG PET in follow-up of therapy for these tumors. However, the role of (18)F-FDG PET versus that of CT has not been established. Therefore, we compared the roles of (18)F-FDG PET and CT in staging and evaluation of early response to imatinib mesylate therapy in recurrent or metastatic GIST. METHODS: The study included 54 patients who underwent (18)F-FDG PET and CT scans within 3 wk before initiation of imatinib mesylate therapy. Forty-nine of these patients underwent repeat scans 2 mo after therapy. The numbers of sites or organs containing lesions on (18)F-FDG PET and CT scans were compared. Corresponding lesions on (18)F-FDG PET and CT scans or those confirmed to be malignant in appearance by other imaging modalities or on follow-up were considered true positives. Lesions seen on (18)F-FDG PET or CT scans but not seen or confirmed to be of benign appearance with other imaging modalities or on follow-up were considered false positives. Measurements of the maximum standard uptake value (SUV) on (18)F-FDG PET scans and tumor size on CT scans were used for quantitative evaluation of early tumor response to therapy. RESULTS: A total of 122 and 114 sites and/or organs were involved on pretherapy (18)F-FDG PET and CT scans, respectively. The sensitivity and positive predictive values (PPVs) for CT were 93% and 100%; whereas these values for (18)F-FDG PET were 86% and 98%. However, the differences between these values for CT and (18)F-FDG PET were not statistically significant (P = 0.27 for sensitivity and 0.25 for PPV). This suggests comparable performance of (18)F-FDG PET and CT in staging GISTs. Repeat scans at 2 mo after therapy showed agreement between (18)F-FDG PET and CT scans in 71.4% of patients (57.1% having a good response to therapy and 14.3% lacking a response). Discrepant results between (18)F-FDG PET and CT were recorded for 28.6% of the patients. (18)F-FDG PET predicted response to therapy earlier than did CT in 22.5% of patients during a longer follow-up interval (4-16 mo), whereas CT predicted lack of response to therapy earlier than (18)F-FDG PET in 4.1%. One patient did not undergo long-term follow-up. These findings suggest that (18)F-FDG PET is superior to CT in predicting early response to therapy in recurrent or metastatic GIST patients. CONCLUSION: The performances of (18)F-FDG PET and CT are comparable in staging GISTs before initiation of imatinib mesylate therapy. However, (18)F-FDG PET is superior to CT in predicting early response to therapy. Thus, (18)F-FDG PET is a better guide for imatinib mesylate therapy.     

18F-FDG PET显像在胰腺恶性病变鉴别诊断及转移灶探查中的应用价值

目的研究18F-FDGPET显像在胰腺恶性肿瘤诊断与鉴别诊断中的应用价值。方法 40例临床疑为胰腺恶性病变的患者均行18F-FDGPET显像,对显像结果进行目测法及SUV值半定量分析,并结合CT,MRI等影像学检查进行综合诊断,最后诊断根据手术病理或经4个月以上随访证实。结果如果以SUV为2.5作为鉴别诊断胰腺病灶良恶性的阈值,24例证实为胰腺癌患者中18F-FDGPET显像正确诊断22例,16例胰腺良性病变患者18F-FDGPET检出13例,其灵敏度、特异度及准确性分别为91.7%（22/24）,81.3%（13/16）及87.5%（35/40）;而结合CT,MRI等其他检查结果进行综合诊断,其诊断灵敏度、特异度及准确性分别为91.7%（22/24）、87.5%（14/16）及90%（36/40）。恶性病变的SUV平均值为4.6±2.6,良性病变的SUV平均值为2.3±1.5,良恶性病变间SUV平均值差异有统计学意义（P〈0.01）。在转移灶的检出中,18F-FDGPET显像发现了全部38处转移灶,并发现6处CT,MRI未能发现的远处转移病灶,排除了1例CT认为是胰周转移性淋巴结肿大的病例。结论 18F-FDGPET对鉴别诊断胰腺良恶性肿瘤的灵敏度、特异性较高,尤其在远处转移灶的探查中有较高应用价值。     

Comparison of delayed enhanced CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of adrenal masses in oncology patients

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively compare delayed enhanced computed tomography (CT) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET)/CT (PET/CT) evaluating adrenal masses in oncology patients undergoing both examinations. METHODS: Twenty adrenal masses in 14 patients were retrospectively included. For delayed enhanced CT, a metastasis was diagnosed if a mass had an absolute percentage loss of enhancement value of less than 60%. For PET/CT, a metastasis was diagnosed if a mass had FDG uptake equal to or greater than that of the liver. RESULTS: The adrenal masses were confirmed as 8 metastases and 12 adenomas by pathological examinations in 5 patients and follow-up CT examinations in 9 patients. The sensitivity and specificity for adenoma at delayed enhanced CT were all 100% and were 88 (7/8) and 75% (9/12) for PET/CT, respectively. Delayed enhanced CT correctly characterized 1 more metastasis and 3 more adenomas than PET/CT. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed enhanced CT might characterize adrenal masses in oncology patients more exactly than PET/CT.     

18F-FDG PET for the diagnosis and grading of soft-tissue sarcoma: a meta-analysis.

PET using (18)F-FDG is increasingly used for the diagnosis and grading of tumors. Several studies have been performed that evaluate the diagnostic and grading performance of (18)F-FDG PET for soft-tissue sarcoma, but each study has had a limited sample size. Therefore, we undertook a comprehensive meta-analysis of the evidence. METHODS: Relevant studies were identified from MEDLINE and EMBASE. Diagnostic and grading performance were evaluated for qualitative visualization; standard uptake value (SUV, cutoffs of 2.0 and 3.0); and metabolic rate of glucose (MRG, cutoff of 6.0 micro mol/100 g/min). Quantitative data synthesis included independent weighting of sensitivity and specificity, construction of summary receiver operating characteristic curves, and pooled analyses. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 15 studies with 441 soft-tissue lesions (227 malignant, 214 benign). For diagnosis of malignant versus benign lesions, typical pairs of sensitivity and specificity estimates from the summary receiver operating characteristic curves were 92% and 73% for qualitative visualization; 87% and 79% for SUV 2.0; 70% and 87% for SUV 3.0; and 74% and 73% for MRG 6.0. Diagnostic performance was similar for primary and recurrent lesions. By qualitative interpretation, (18)F-FDG was positive in all intermediate/high-grade tumors (95% confidence interval [CI], 97.3%-100%), 74.4% (95% CI, 58.6%-85.9%) of low-grade tumors, and 39.3% (95% CI, 29.1%-50.3%) of benign lesions (including 11 of 12 inflammatory lesions). Using an SUV cutoff of 2.0, respective rates were 89.4% (95% CI, 79.4%-95.6%), 33.1% (95% CI, 15.6%-55.3%), and 19.1% (95% CI, 10.6%-30.5%). Limited data on comparisons with MRI and CT showed no differences against (18)F-FDG PET in diagnosing recurrent and metastatic disease. CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET has very good discriminating ability in the evaluation of both primary and recurrent soft-tissue lesions. (18)F-FDG PET may be helpful in tumor grading but offers inadequate discrimination between low-grade tumors and benign lesions.     

Adrenal lesions: characterization with fused PET/CT image in patients with proved or suspected malignancy--initial experience

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the accuracy of the fused positron emission tomographic (PET)/computed tomographic (CT) image for characterization of adrenal lesions in patients who have proved malignancy or are suspected of having malignancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was received for this retrospective HIPAA-compliant study, and informed consent was waived. Forty-one adrenal lesions in 38 patients (21 men, 17 women; mean age, 66 years; range, 37-86 years) were evaluated with PET/CT. Of the 41 lesions, nine were assumed to be malignant with documentation of enlargement (n = 8) or reduction in size in response to treatment (n = 1), and 32 were assumed to be benign with documentation of stability for 6 months (n = 31) or with confirmation with biopsy results (n = 1). The PET examination findings were positive when adrenal lesion maximum standardized uptake values (SUVs) exceeded hepatic maximum SUVs. CT contrast medium washout analysis was used to further characterize two lesions with PET findings positive for malignancy. The t test was used to assess significant (P < .05) differences between fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake of benign lesions and that of malignant lesions. RESULTS: At PET/CT, findings for all malignant lesions were positive (mean adrenal lesion-liver activity ratio, 4.04; range, 1.53-17.08). Of the 32 benign lesions, most (30 of 32) had activity less than that of the liver (mean ratio, 0.66; range, 0.22-0.94). PET/CT demonstrated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of 100%, 93.8%, 81.8%, 100%, and 95.1%, respectively. Incorporating contrast material-enhanced CT with delayed imaging increased specificity to 100% because two lesions with PET findings positive for malignancy were characterized as benign. There was a significant difference between maximum SUV (P < .05) and the ratio of adrenal lesion-liver FDG activity (P < .001) in benign versus malignant adrenal lesions. CONCLUSION: PET/CT provides a powerful combination of functional and attenuation information for adrenal lesion characterization. All malignant lesions were detected at PET/CT, with no false-negative results.     

Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in staging and follow-up of lymphoma in pediatric and young adult patients

OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT in pediatric patients with Hodgkin disease (HD) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 31 patients, mean age 12.9 +/- 5.1, HD (n = 24), and NHL (n = 7) underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT at diagnosis (n = 31 studies) and later in the course of the disease (n = 75 studies). The findings of PET/CT were correlated with diagnostic CT and clinical follow-up. RESULTS: PET/CT findings resulted in a change of disease staging in 10 patients (32.3%), upstaging in 7 (22.6%) and downstaging in 3 (9.6%). On a lesion analysis, 164 disease sites were detected by PET/CT of which 38 were overlooked by DCT.At mid-treatment, PET was negative in 28 out of 31 patients (90%) with negative predictive value of 96% as all latter patients except for 1, were disease free (mean 15.4 +/- 8.8 months). The positive predictive value of persistent increased 18F-FDG uptake was 100% as 3 patients with latter findings had active disease. On the CT part, 76 residual masses were identified in 22 patients. Increased 18F-FDG uptake was detected in 11 masses in 4 patients who had active disease. Remaining 65 PET negative masses were false positive findings. The positive predictive value of residual CT mass was 14%. CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT is associated with change in staging in approximately 1 out of 3 pediatric patients with HD and NHL. When used for monitoring response to treatment, a negative study is associated with disease-free period, even when residual mass is detected. A positive PET study indicates residual malignant disease.     

18F-FDG PET/CT联合肺动脉灌注成像指数在单发肺结节中的应用价值

目的探讨18F-FDG PET/CT联合320容积CT双入口灌注成像(DI-CTP)肺动脉灌注指数(PPI)对单发性肺结节的鉴别诊断价值。方法搜集经病理证实40例单发性肺结节患者的18F-FDG PET/CT及320排CT灌注成像影像资料(恶性结节24例、良性结节16例),PET/CT以结节18F-FDG摄取值SUV≥2.5为诊断恶性结节阈值,18F-FDG PET/CT联合PPI则在SUV≥2.5诊断阈值的基础上综合PPI<50%判定,并分析SUV与PP均值在良恶性结节间差异性及相关性。结果PET/CT联合PPI正确诊断38例,其中恶性结节22例、良性结节16例,误诊2例。18F-FDG PET/CT联合PPI诊断肺单发结节的敏感性91.6%,特异性100%,准确性95.0%;18F-PDG摄取值SUV在良、恶性结间差异无统计学意义(t=1.66,P>0.05),而PPI均值在良、恶性结节间差异有统计学意义(t=-3.14,P<0.01);SUV与PPI间相关性无统计学意义(r=0.20,P>0.05)。结论18F-FDG PET/CT联合PPI可以提高诊断肺单发肺结节敏感性、特异性和准确性,减少误诊率。     

Utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT uptake patterns in Waldeyer's ring for differentiating benign from malignant lesions in lateral pharyngeal recess of nasopharynx.

Focally increased (18)F-FDG uptake in the lateral pharyngeal recess (LPR) of the nasopharynx due to a benign or malignant lesion is not an uncommon finding on PET images. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether, on PET/CT images, (18)F-FDG uptake occurs with characteristic patterns and intensities in various regions of Waldeyer's ring that can improve our ability to differentiate benign from malignant lesions. METHODS: Data generated from the (18)F-FDG PET/CT images of 1,628 subjects in our cancer-screening program were analyzed. Increased uptake in the LPR was observed in 80 subjects (4.9%) presenting with benign lesions, including 53 subjects without and 27 subjects with symptoms of upper airway discomfort. In addition, 30 healthy controls and 21 patients with newly diagnosed nasopharyngeal carcinoma were recruited for this study. Visual uptake, measurements of the lesions' standardized uptake value (SUV), and any abnormalities on PET/CT were evaluated. The receiver-operating-characteristic curve and area under the curve were applied to evaluate the discriminating power. RESULTS: Increased (18)F-FDG uptake (SUV, mean +/- SD) was found in the LPR, with a statistically significant (P < 0.001) difference between benign lesions (3.0 +/- 1.16) and malignant lesions (7.03 +/- 3.83). However, associated increased uptake exclusively in the palatine tonsil, lingual tonsil, and submandibular gland was found in both asymptomatic and symptomatic subjects. The ratio of LPR uptake to palatine tonsil uptake (N/P ratio) in benign lesions (0.81 +/- 0.37) was significantly (P < 0.001) lower than that in malignant lesions (2.30 +/- 1.62). Higher incidences of asymmetric (18)F-FDG LPR uptake, cervical lymph node uptake, and asymmetric wall thickening of the LPR on CT were observed in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. When an SUV of less than 3.9 and an N/P ratio of less than 1.5 were used as cutoff points in subjects showing the combination of symmetric uptake in the LPR and normal or symmetric wall thickening, and detectable lymph node uptake, the area under the curve for benign lesions on PET/CT was 0.932 +/- 0.042 (95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.98), with a sensitivity of 90.4% and a specificity of 93.8%. CONCLUSION: The intensity and patterns of (18)F-FDG uptake in various regions of Waldeyer's ring along with CT scan findings provide a feasible modality to differentiate benign from malignant nasopharyngeal lesions.     

Malignant involvement of the spine: assessment by 18F-FDG PET/CT.

The purpose of the study was to assess the role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the assessment of secondary malignant involvement of the spinal column. METHODS: In 51 patients, 242 lesions at the spinal region detected on (18)F-FDG PET/CT were interpreted separately on PET, CT, and fused PET/CT images, including differentiation between benign and malignant lesions and the level in the vertebral column. CT evaluation also included the type of bony lesion (osteolytic, osteoblastic, or mixed) and accompanying soft-tissue abnormalities; for example, epidural masses and tumor involvement of the neural foramina. RESULTS: Of the 242 lesions detected on PET/CT, PET alone identified 220 lesions and CT alone identified 159; 217 (90%) were malignant and 25 benign. (18)F-FDG PET alone detected significantly more malignant lesions than did CT alone (96% vs. 68%, respectively, P < 0.001). The specificity was 56% for both PET alone and CT alone. PET alone was incorrect in determining the level of abnormality within the vertebral column in 33 (15%) lesions and in determining the part of the vertebra involved in 40 (18%) lesions. In 17 (33%) patients, either epidural extension of tumor (n = 7 lesions), neural foramen involvement of tumor (n = 7 lesions), or a combination of both (n = 11 lesions) was detected. On a patient-based analysis, the sensitivity of PET and of PET/CT for the detection of spinal metastasis was 98% and 74%, respectively (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET/CT has better specificity for detection of malignant involvement of the spine than does (18)F-FDG PET. It allows for precise localization of lesions and identifies accompanying soft-tissue involvement, which is of potential neurologic significance.     

18 F-FDG PET/CT in diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of patients with cardiac masses: a retrospective study

Correct diagnosis and prognostic assessment of cardiac masses are crucial before therapy. We evaluated the diagnostic and prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with cardiac masses. 18F-FDG PET/CT images of 64 patients with 65 cardiac masses were retrospectively analysed (34 men, 30 women; average age, 51.2 ± 17.5 years). Comparisons of CT features and 18F-FDG metabolic indices between benign and malignant entities, as well as among primary and secondary malignancies and lymphoma, were performed. The diagnostic values of PET/CT for distinguishing benign versus malignant masses were calculated. PET/CT data were further assessed for the predictive value for overall survival (OS) using the Cox proportional hazards model to assess potential independent predictors. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to assess the value of PET/CT for prognostication. Statistically significant differences in various morphological features and metabolic indices between benign and malignant masses were found. An SUVmax of 6.75 was the optimal cutoff value to differentiate between benign and malignant masses, and the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 92.11%, 88.89%, 90.77%, 92.11%, and 88.89%, respectively. Taking CT features and SUVmax ≥ 6.75 as a criterion, the values were 76.32%, 100.00%, 86.15%, 100.00%, and 75.00%, respectively; taking ≥ 3 CT features or SUVmax ≥ 6.75 as a criterion, the values were 94.74%, 88.89%, 92.31%, 92.31%, and 92.31%, respectively, indicating optimal diagnostic performance when paired with the anatomic information provided by the CT component. A univariate analysis of OS determined that surrounding tissue infiltration, epicardial infiltration, necrosis, multiple chambers or vessel involvement, distant metastasis, SUVmax, SUVmean, metabolic tumour volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were significant predictors of survival. In the multivariate analysis, only SUVmax ≥ 6.715 was significant (P < 0.01). Median OS was 1460 days for SUVmax < 6.715 and 342 days for SUVmax ≥ 6.715 (P < 0.01). 18F-FDG PET/CT is helpful in the diagnosis of cardiac masses before treatment and has value in detecting extracardiac primary or secondary tumours. 18F-FDG PET/CT could also be a promising tool to provide prognostic information for these patients, especially SUVmax displaying independent prognostic value.     

Evaluation of Adrenal Masses in Lung Cancer Patients Using F-18 FDG PET/CT

Purpose

The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic efficacy of PET/CT using various parameters for the characterization of adrenal nodules in lung cancer patients.

Methods

Sixty-one adrenal nodules in 51 lung cancer patients were evaluated. The final diagnosis was based on histology (n = 2) or imaging follow-up (n = 59, range of follow-up: 7–57 months, median 27 months). Each adrenal nodule was analyzed using four parameters of PET/CT: the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max), the adrenal nodule/liver ratio of the SUV (SUV ratio), Hounsfield units (HU) and size. The optimal cutoff of each parameter for the identification of metastatic nodule was determined by ROC analysis and then the diagnostic efficacy was compared among the parameters.

Results

Of the 61 adrenal nodules, 45 (73%) were considered metastasis. The optimal cutoff values of the parameters were SUV_max >2.7, SUV ratio >1.3, HU >18 and size >20 mm, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy by SUV_max >2.7 were 88.9%, 87.5% and 88.5%, and those by SUV ratio >1.3 were 84.4%, 100% and 88.5%, respectively. The combination of SUV ratio >1.3 and HU >18 had sensitivity of 97.7%, specificity of 81.2% and accuracy of 93.4% to predict adrenal metastasis in patients with lung cancer.

Conclusion

SUV ratio from F-18 FDG PET/CT could identify the adrenal metastasis in lung cancer patients. The combination of SUV ratio and HU can improve the accuracy of differentiating benign and metastatic adrenal lesions in lung cancer patients.