ED与LUTS药物治疗的相关性研究

目的探索、研究勃起功能障碍(ED)和下尿路症状(LUTS)在药物治疗方面是否存在相关性。方法本组研究对象80例病人均患有ED和LUTS,分为3组,每例研究对象在初诊时,必须填写IIEF-5、IPSS评分表,作为研究开始的基线。A组服用两地那非,B组服用多沙唑嗪控释片,C组联合应用西地那非和多沙唑嗪控释片。用药6个月后再次填写IIEF-5和IPSS评分表以作对比。用方差分析检验方法,进行用药前后数据统计学分析。结果3组治疗前后IIEF-5、IPSS评分变化差异均有编者计学意义,C组(联合用药组)变化最大(P<0.001)。结论ED与LUTS相互影响,ED患者LUTS发生率明显升高,而LUTS患者的ED危险性亦显著增加。西地那非可显著改善ED患者合并的LUTS症状,多沙唑嗪可改善LUTS患者的性功能;西地那非联合多沙唑嗪治疗ED、LUTS患者具协同作用。     

伴有下尿路症状的良性前列腺增生患者勃起功能状况及坦索罗辛的干预研究

目的:研究伴有下尿路症状(LUTS)的良性前列腺增生(BPH)对患者性功能的影响及坦索罗辛干预的效果。方法:192例典型的伴有LUTS的BPH患者治疗前进行国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、生活质量评分(QOL)、勃起功能障碍国际问卷5(IIEF-5)调查,同时检测最大尿流率(Qm ax)。然后随机分两组,治疗组(103例)给予坦索罗辛0.2 mg,对照组(89例)应用安慰剂,1次/d,疗程8周。分析治疗前不同因素对性功能的影响和治疗后LUTS及性功能改善情况。结果:192例患者治疗前IPSS评分3~32(20.20±6.81)分,QOL评分0~6(4.51±0.76)分,Qm ax 8~30(9.6±8.79)m l/s,IIEF-5评分1~24(9.80±8.62)分。勃起功能障碍(ED)发生率75%(144/192)。统计学显示:IPSS和IIEF-5有明显的相关性(r=-0.312,P<0.001)。年龄与IPSS和IIEF-5均有明显的相关性(r=0.203,P<0.005和r=-0.571,P<0.001)。对照组治疗后各项指标变化差异无显著性,治疗组治疗后各项指标较治疗前有明显改善(P<0.001),好于对照组(P<0.001)。结论:年龄和LUTS是性功能障碍的危险因素,LUTS的严重程度与性功能障碍的发展密切相关。坦索罗辛在改善LUTS的同时可明显改善患者的性功能状况。     

下尿路症状合并勃起功能障碍联合用药的有效性和安全性

目的:评价多沙唑嗪、非那雄胺和西地那非联合治疗BPH相关的LUTS和ED的有效性和安全性。方法:采用双盲、随机、安慰剂对照的临床研究,84例患者随机分入A、B、C组,A组服用多沙唑嗪、非那雄胺和安慰剂,B组服用多沙唑嗪、安慰剂和西地那非,C组服用多沙唑嗪、非那雄胺和西地那非。16周后比较各组的IIEF-5、IPSS、Qmax、夜尿次数和残余尿等,并记录不良反应。结果:A、B、C组的IIEF-5分别提高10.2%、57.1%和57.6%,IPSS分别降低22.2%、20.8%和20.1%。18例(21.4%)患者有较轻的不良反应。结论:多沙唑嗪、非那雄胺和西地那非联合治疗BPH相关的LUTS和ED是安全有效的。     

The effectiveness of sildenafil citrate in patients with erectile dysfunction and lower urinary system symptoms and the significance of asymptomatic inflammatory prostatitis

We evaluated the effectiveness of sildenafil citrate on lower urinary system symptoms (LUTS) by using symptom score scales. We also evaluated whether or not the presence of asymptomatic inflammatory prostatitis had an effect on the alteration in the symptom scores. A total of 36 male patients were included in the study. For all the cases, 'International Prostate Symptom Score' (IPSS), 'National Health Institute Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index' (NIH-CPSI) and 'International Index of Erectile Function' (IIEF-5) were investigated and the scores were calculated in the first visit. Sildenafil citrate was given for 30 days and at the second visit IPSS, NIH-CPSI and IIEF-5 scores were once more analyzed. Afterwards, the alterations of the scores between visits were statistically compared. Mean age of the 36 cases included in the study was 59.03±1.35. When the alterations in parameters of first visit and second visit were evaluated, we found a statistically significant increase in IIEF-5 and a statistically significant decrease in IPSS, IPSS-QOL (Quality of Life). In addition, when the cases were divided into two groups with and without asymptomatic inflammatory prostatitis, in the cases with asymptomatic inflammatory prostatitis, sildenafil citrate caused improvement only in ED, but had no effect on LUTS. Sildenafil citrate use in cases with LUTS and ED has an improving effect on LUTS as well as ED. However, in cases with asymptomatic inflammatory prostatitis, sildenafil citrate did not lead to an improvement in LUTS.     

A randomised, placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy of twice-daily vardenafil in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia

INTRODUCTION: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is associated with bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and reduced patient quality of life (QoL). Phosphodiesterase (type) 5 (PDE5) inhibitors such as vardenafil are commonly used for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED), but have also been shown to improve the symptoms of BPH. This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigated the effects of vardenafil on LUTS and QoL in men with BPH/LUTS, with or without concomitant ED. METHODS: Men aged 45-64 yr with BPH/LUTS and an International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) > or =12 were randomised to receive either 10mg vardenafil or placebo twice daily. LUTS were assessed with the use of two primary efficacy parameters, IPSS score and maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), as well as postvoid residual (PVR) urine volume; ED was measured with the use of the erectile function (EF) domain score of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF); and QoL was assessed with the Urolifetrade mark QoL-9 questionnaire. RESULTS: After 8 wk of treatment, there was a significant improvement in the IPSS total score in the vardenafil group compared with placebo (-5.9 and -3.6, respectively; p=0.0013). Nominally significant improvements in irritative and obstructive IPSS subscores (p=0.0017 and p=0.0081, respectively), EF (p=0.0001), and Urolife QoL-9 (p<0.0001) were also associated with vardenafil treatment. Qmax and PVR urine volume did not change significantly with treatment, although baseline values were already considered close to normal. Vardenafil was generally well tolerated, with most adverse events considered mild or moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Vardenafil treatment significantly improved LUTS, EF, and QoL in men with BPH/LUTS. Vardenafil may be considered a promising treatment option for men with symptoms secondary to BPH.     

A combined analysis of double-blind trials of the efficacy and tolerability of doxazosin-gastrointestinal therapeutic system, doxazosin standard and placebo in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE: To report an integrated analysis of two previous studies fully characterizing the clinical utility of the controlled-release gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) formulation of doxazosin in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two pivotal randomized, double-blind studies of doxazosin GITS for BPH were assessed by an integrated analysis. Both studies included a 2-week washout period, a 2-week single-blind placebo run-in phase, and a 13-week double-blind treatment phase. One study compared doxazosin GITS, doxazosin standard (-S) and placebo in 795 men; the other compared doxazosin GITS and doxazosin-S in 680 men. Doxazosin GITS was initiated at 4 mg once daily and titrated to 8 mg once daily after 7 weeks, and doxazosin-S was initiated at 1 mg once daily and titrated to a maximum of 8 mg once daily over 7 weeks as needed to achieve optimal symptom control. The primary outcome measures were mean changes from baseline to the final visit for the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) in the per-protocol population. Numerous symptom- and urinary-related secondary outcomes were assessed, as were effects of therapy on male erectile dysfunction measured using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) in one study. RESULTS: Both doxazosin GITS and doxazosin-S significantly improved the symptoms of BPH, as shown by a 45% reduction for each in total IPSS from baseline to final visit, compared with a 34% reduction in patients on placebo. Doxazosin GITS and doxazosin-S produced comparable improvements in Qmax that were significantly greater than with placebo, with a greater improvement sooner after treatment with doxazosin GITS than with doxazosin-S. Nearly half of the patients on doxazosin GITS had symptom relief at the 4-mg starting dose. A similar number of patients in both doxazosin groups were titrated to the maximum dose. Secondary outcomes were consistent with the primary effects. Both doxazosin GITS and doxazosin-S produced significant improvements in sexual function according to IIEF scores among those with dysfunction at baseline. The overall incidence of adverse events was similar among patients treated with doxazosin GITS and placebo, and slightly lower than those on doxazosin-S. There was no apparent difference in the type of adverse events reported for the two formulations of doxazosin, although most adverse events were reported at a lower frequency with doxazosin GITS. CONCLUSION: Doxazosin GITS is significantly more effective than placebo in reducing the clinical symptoms of BPH and improving Qmax, and as effective as doxazosin-S. Both doxazosin formulations improved sexual function in patients with BPH and sexual dysfunction at baseline. Doxazosin GITS produced a therapeutic effect equivalent to that of doxazosin-S, but with fewer titration steps and a slightly lower overall incidence of adverse events.     

Initial combined treatment with anticholinergics and α-blockers for men with lower urinary tract symptoms related to BPH and overactive bladder: a prospective, randomized, multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination treatment using anticholinergics with α-blocker for initial treatment of both overactive bladder (OAB) and other lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), secondary to BPH. A 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at four urology clinics in Korea, involving men, aged 50 years or older, with LUTS related to BPH and OAB. A total of 176 patients were randomly assigned to receive doxazosin (4 mg) plus placebo or doxazosin (4 mg) plus tolterodine SR (4 mg), once a day for 12 weeks. Changes from baseline in total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), bladder diary variables, patient perception of bladder condition (PPBC), uroflowmetry, postvoid residual volume and IPSS subscores (voiding and storage) were analyzed. Of the 176 enrolled patients, 91 had doxazosin gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) and placebo, and 85 had combined medication with doxazosin GITS and tolterodine SR. Compared with the doxazosin plus placebo group, the doxazosin plus tolterodine group showed significant reductions in IPSS storage subscore and improvement in the quality of life item, urgency episodes, as well as in micturition frequency at weeks 4 and 12. However, it failed to improve PPBC at week 4 as well as at week 12. Earlier intervention with anticholinergics plus α-blocker was tolerated well, including the questions about urinary retention (n=1) and dry mouth (n=2). Initial combination treatment of anticholinergics plus α-blocker showed positive results for men with LUTS related to BPH and OAB symptoms and did not increase the risk of urinary retention.     

万艾可治疗ED时对BPH引起LUTS改善的研究

目的 :探索、研究万艾可在治疗阴茎勃起功能障碍 (ED)时对由良性前列腺增生 (BPH)引起的下尿路症状(LUTS)的影响。　方法 :32例ED同时伴有BPH的研究对象 ,采用IIEF 5问卷表和IPSS评分表 ,在服用万艾可前和服药后 6个月分别各填写一次 ,应用单因素方差分析对所得到的前后评分进行统计学分析。结果 :在服药前32例ED中 ,轻、中、重分别为 14、13、5例 ,BPH中轻、中、重分别为 3、15、14例 ;服药后IIEF 5评分平均上升4 2 .36 % ,IPSS评分平均下降 2 0 .14 % ,两者在统计学上都有显著性差异 ,P <0 .0 1。　结论 :在治疗中老年性ED合并BPH中 ,应用万艾可既能治疗ED ,取得完美的性生活 ,又能达到改善由BPH引起的LUTS。万艾可是一治疗ED有效的药物 ,但对于前列腺基质平滑肌亦有辅助性松弛作用 ,因此也有助于BPH时LUTS的缓解。     

Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with mirodenafil and α1-blocker for benign prostatic hyperplasia-induced lower urinary tract symptoms accompanied by erectile dysfunction: a multicenter, open-label, prospective study

This study was conducted to determine whether mirodenafil 100 mg, when administered on demand to patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who are receiving α1-blocker therapy, is safe with regard to the cardiovascular system and whether it improves lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and sexual function. The study involved 121 LUTS/BPH patients who had been treated for at least 3 months with α1-blockers before being administered with mirodenafil 100 mg on demand. Before the start of mirodenafil administration, the blood pressure, heart rate, international prostate symptom score (IPSS)/quality of life (QoL), peak urine flow rate (Qmax), post-voiding residual urine volume (PVR), and international index of erectile function-5 (IIEF-5) of each patient were measured. At 4 and 8 weeks after commencing mirodenafil administration, the blood pressure and heart rate were measured again, any adverse effects of mirodenafil were assessed, and sexual function and voiding symptoms were re-evaluated. Of the 121 patients, 73 (60.3%) completed the 8-week clinical trial. Significant changes in blood pressure and heart rate were not observed during the study. Significant improvements in the IIEF-5 and the IPSS/QoL, but not the Qmax or PVR, were observed. The results of this study suggest that the administration of mirodenafil 100 mg on demand may induce few hypotensive interactions and may be acceptably effective with regard to improving LUTS and sexual function.     

Efficacy of alfuzosin and sildenafil combination in male patients with lower urinary tract symptoms

Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and erectile dysfunction (ED) are frequently encountered in ageing males. We compared the efficacy of alfuzosin 10 mg alone or in combination with sildenafil 50 mg in the treatment of LUTS due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. One hundred male patients older than 45 years were randomized to two groups containing 50 patients each; one group receiving alfuzosin 10 mg and the other group alfuzosin 10 mg combined with sildenafil 50 mg. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), maximum flow rate (Q(max)), prostate volume and post-void residual urine were evaluated. The mean age was 60.2 ± 17.8. Mean data of evaluated parameters in both groups at the end of 3rd month compared with baseline values are given respective order as; 5.1 (26.8%) and 5.8 (28.2%) points decreases in IPSS; 1.6 (41.1%) and 1.8 (45%) points decreases in QoL; and 3.4 (29.6%) and 3.4 (33%) points increases in Q(max) . The outcomes of our study cannot be interpreted in such a way to report that alpha blocker-PDE5 inhibitor combination has a better efficacy than alpha blocker treatment alone in patients with LUTS.     

Association between ED and LUTS in Japanese motorcyclists

Recently, the association between motorcycling and erectile dysfunction (ED) has been reported. Also, lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) were reported to be associated with ED. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association of ED with LUTS in motorcyclists. We investigated the prevalence and the status of ED using a 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) in 150 motorcyclists. ED was diagnosed when the IIEF-5 score was less than 17. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was also applied, and the relationship between IIEF-5 and IPSS was evaluated. Of the 150 motorcyclists, 37 (25%) had ED, and 31 (21%) had moderate or severe symptoms of LUTS (IPSS >or=8). The IIEF-5 was significantly associated with the severity of IPSS (P=0.002) and age (P<0.0001). The IIEF-5 was also significantly associated with the scores of both voiding (P<0.0001) and storage symptoms (P=0.001). On stepwise logistic regression analysis, age and storage symptoms are independent risk factors for ED in motorcyclists. LUTS seemed to be associated with ED in motorcyclists.     

Combination of alfuzosin and sildenafil is superior to monotherapy in treating lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile dysfunction

OBJECTIVES: This pilot study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of the alpha(1)-blocker alfuzosin 10mg once daily (OD), the PDE-5 inhibitor sildenafil 25mg OD, and the combination of both on lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and erectile dysfunction (ED). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Men aged 50-76 yr with previously untreated LUTS and ED were randomized to receive alfuzosin (n=20), sildenafil (n=21), or the combination of both (n=21) for 12 wk. Changes from baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), voiding diary, maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual urine (PVRU) volume, and erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) were assessed at week 12. RESULTS: Improvement of IPSS was significant with the three treatments but greatest with the combination (-24.1%) compared with alfuzosin (-15.6%) and sildenafil (-11.8%) [corrected] alone (p<0.03). Frequency, nocturia, PVR, and Qmax were significantly improved with alfuzosin only and the combination. Improvement in IIEF was slight with alfuzosin (16.7%), marked with sildenafil (49.7%), and greatest with the combination (58.6%). Likewise, increases in the frequency of penetration (Q3) and of maintained erection (Q4) were greater with the combination therapy (65.2% and 68.2%, respectively) than with sildenafil (41.7% and 59.1%, respectively) and alfuzosin (27.3% and 33.3%, respectively) alone. All three treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, the combination of alfuzosin 10 mg OD and sildenafil 25 mg OD is safe and more effective than monotherapy with either agent to improve both voiding and sexual dysfunction in men with LUTS suggestive of BPH.     

Controlled-release doxazosin in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of controlled-release doxazosin for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). SCOPE: In this open-label, noncontrolled, observational surveillance study, 3684 men with BPH received 4-8 mg of controlled-release doxazosin gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) for 6 months; 3283 (89.1%) patients completed the trial. Changes in urinary symptoms and quality of life were assessed using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Blood pressure and adverse events were assessed. CONCLUSION: After 6 months' treatment with doxazosin GITS resulted in significant improvements in IPSS. BP was reduced only in hypertensive patients. Doxazosin, GITS was well tolerated.     

速尿联合多沙唑嗪治疗BPH/LUTS患者夜尿增多的研究

目的:探讨速尿联合多沙唑嗪治疗BPH/LUTS患者夜尿增多的疗效及安全性。方法:将64例BPH/LUTS夜尿增多患者随机均分为两组,一组患者给予多沙唑嗪(4 mg/d),另一组患者给予速尿(睡前6 h40 mg)联合多沙唑嗪,两组患者分别治疗4周后,记录并分析治疗前后患者的尿量、IPSS评分、QOL评分、血电解质和血浆渗透压变化情况。结果:速尿联合多沙唑嗪组与单用多沙唑嗪组比较,夜尿次数明显减少(P<0.01),白天尿量增加(P<0.01),夜间尿量减少(P<0.01),总尿量无明显改变(P>0.05),IPSS评分下降(P<0.05),QOL评分明显下降(P<0.01),血钠、钾、氯、渗透压无明显变化(P>0.05)。结论:速尿联合多沙唑嗪治疗BPH/LUTS患者夜尿增多的疗效明显,4周的治疗是安全的。     

Sildenafil influences lower urinary tract symptoms

OBJECTIVE: To assess the possible relationship between erectile dysfunction (ED) and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men, and whether treatment of their ED with sildenafil influences their LUTS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 112 men with ED attending the andrology outpatient clinic were offered oral sildenafil and reviewed 1 and 3 months after treatment. They completed the International Index of Erectile Function and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaires at baseline and each review. Scores were designated to indicate the visit number and differences between the visits calculated. RESULTS: A third of the men had an initial IPSS of > 7; there was no relationship between baseline urinary and sexual function scores. After treatment with sildenafil, the urinary scores at 3 months correlated strongly with the sexual function scores. There was a significant inverse relationship between the baseline IPSS and sexual function scores after treatment. The overall trend in the IPSS was towards improvement after treatment with sildenafil. CONCLUSIONS: In men with ED there is no relationship between sexual function scores and urinary symptom scores before treating ED. Treatment with sildenafil appears to improve urinary symptom scores. A lower IPSS at baseline appears to predict a better response to ED therapy with sildenafil.     

男性下尿路症状和勃起功能障碍的相关性分析

目的:了解社区年龄≥50岁男性人群中有下尿路症状(LUTS)者ED的患病情况,评估LUTS(梗阻症状、刺激症状)和ED之间的相关性。方法:2006年10～11月对社区年龄≥50岁、有固定性伴侣的男性进行IPSS、IIEF-5调查,调查对象均签署知情同意书,完成规定问诊及相关检查,应用统计学方法对IPSS评分、梗阻症状评分以及刺激症状评分与勃起功能之间的相关性进行分析。结果:共调查245例,171例有LUTS患者中ED患病率为81.9%(140/171),无LUTS患者74例作为对照组,ED患病率为29.7%(22/74)。LUTS组中各年龄组ED的患病率分别为:50～59岁73.1%(38/52)、60～69岁82.1%(46/56)、≥70岁88.9%(56/63),各年龄组之间IPSS、IIEF-5比较差异有显著性(P<0.01),各年龄组之间轻、中、重度ED所占比例比较差异有显著性(P<0.01)。LUTS组中IPSS评分程度分布:轻度80例(46.8%)、中度67例(39.2%)、重度24例(14.0%),不同程度LUTS中ED者所占比例分别为:轻度LUTS71.3%(57/80)、中度LUTS89.6%(60/67)、重度LUTS95.8%(23/24),LUTS程度和ED患病率之间有显著相差性(r=0.52,P<0.01)。171例平均梗阻症状评分(3.1±3.6)分,梗阻症状与IIEF-5评分相关系数r=-0.41(P<0.01),平均刺激症状评分(6.8±4.9)分,刺激症状与IIEF-5评分相关系数r=-0.59(P<0.01)。结论:社区LUTS人群中ED有较高的患病率,LUTS程度和ED患病率显著性正相关,与梗阻症状相比刺激症状对中老年男性性生活的影响更大。在治疗LUTS的同时应该考虑ED问题,以求更有效改善患者生活质量。     

Comparison of two alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonists, naftopidil and tamsulosin hydrochloride, in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized crossover study

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of two alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists, alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor-selective tamsulosin hydrochloride and alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor-selective naftopidil, in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients (mean age 72.4 years, sd 4.3, range 66-79) with LUTS (International Prostate Symptom Score, IPSS >8) secondary to BPH were enrolled in a randomized crossover study. Seventeen patients were initially prescribed naftopidil 50 mg for 4 weeks, followed by tamsulosin 0.2 mg for 4 weeks (group A); another 17 were initially prescribed tamsulosin 0.2 mg, followed by naftopidil 50 mg (group B). Patients changed to the alternative treatment after a 1-week washout period. Efficacy criteria were improvement in LUTS (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), uroflowmetry, and pressure-flow study (PFS) values based on the treatment with each agent. RESULTS: At baseline there were no significant differences between the groups in IPSS, QoL, uroflowmetry values or PFS values, except for the volume at maximum desire to void. After treatment with each agent, the IPSS and QoL were significantly improved and the reduction in bladder outlet obstruction confirmed by PFS. Naftopidil was significantly more effective than tamsulosin in relieving nocturia. The increases from baseline (before treatment) to the endpoint (after treatment with each agent) in the volume at first desire and maximum desire to void were significantly higher with naftopidil than with tamsulosin. Involuntary contractions disappeared in two patients with relief of nocturia with naftopidil, but not with tamsulosin. The decrease in other symptoms of the IPSS, QoL, increase in uroflowmetry values and changes in other PFS values were similar for both agents. CONCLUSIONS: The two agents provided similar efficacy in the treatment of LUTS with BPH. However, naftopidil was better than tamsulosin for nocturia. The disappearance of involuntary contraction and the greater increase in first-desire volume with naftopidil may be associated with the relief of nocturia. The alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor antagonist is effective in alleviating both voiding and storage symptoms. The alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor antagonist may be more effective than the alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor antagonist in LUTS with BPH.     

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is prevalent, bothersome and underdiagnosed in patients consulting urologists for benign prostatic syndrome (BPS)

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of erectile dysfunction (ED) in patients visiting office-based urologists in Germany because of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and to evaluate the impact of ED on quality of life (QoL) in these patients. METHODS: 500 office-based urologists in Germany were invited to evaluate 20 consecutive patients for erectile dysfunction, who presented because of BPH-related LUTS. Physicians provided information on demographic factors, duration and treatment history of BPH, severity of LUTS, ED risk factors, and assessed the patient for the clinical diagnosis of ED. Patients were asked to complete the German version of the IPSS to measure LUTS severity. ED-patients quantified erectile dysfunction and impact on quality of life with validated German questionnaires (Cologne assessment of male erectile dysfunction KEED, and Qol-Med). RESULTS: Office-based urologists were aware of ED in 37.3% of 8768 patients presenting for LUTS before the study, 14.7% of patients were treated for ED. After the study-related assessment, physicians diagnosed ED in 62.1% of these patients and planned treatment in 46.9%. Severity of LUTS and ED prevalence correlated significantly after age-stratification. The incidence of ED was increased in patients with established ED risk factors. Mean QoL-Med score (best QoL: 100, worst QoL: 0) was 53.8 in patients with ED and 50.1 in ED-patients considering treatment. CONCLUSION: ED is highly prevalent in LUTS patients visiting an office-based urologist and is accompanied by a profound impact on the quality of life. Apparently, even during an urological consultation many ED-patients are hesitant to actively ask for treatment. Sexual issues should become key considerations for physicians managing patients with LUTS, especially since effective and well established oral treatment for ED is available.     

Efficacy and safety of tamsulosin hydrochloride compared to doxazosin in the treatment of Indonesian patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia

AIM: The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of tamsulosin hydrochloride and doxazosin in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: The safety and efficacy of tamsulosin (0.2 mg) and doxazosin (2 mg) was determined after once daily administration for 6 weeks in an open-label, randomized, multicenter study of 101 men with BPH. The International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS), maximal urinary flow rates (Qmax), average urinary flow rates (Qave) and residual urine were determined at baseline and again at 6 weeks as efficacy parameters. The primary parameters used for safety evaluation were vital signs (blood pressure and heart rate) and adverse events. The number of patients with a clinically significant response to treatment with tamsulosin or doxazosin was determined and defined as those with >20% improvement from the baseline Qmax or >20% decrease in total IPSS. RESULTS: The total IPSS decreased significantly in both the tamsulosin and doxazosin groups compared to baseline. There was a significant difference in the decrease in total IPSS between two groups. Qmax, Qave and residual urine significantly improved only in the tamsulosin group. There were no significant differences in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure or heart rate profile in the tamsulosin group; however, doxazosin resulted in a significant difference in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Tamsulosin was well tolerated; only three patients (6%) in the tamsulosin group reported an adverse event (dizziness) while 11 patients (22%) in the doxazosin group reported an adverse event (dizziness), one of whom withdrew from the study. CONCLUSIONS: Tamsulosin was shown to be more effective than doxazosin in the treatment of LUTS due to BPH.     

Are lower urinary tract symptoms associated with erectile dysfunction in aging males of Taiwan?

INTRODUCTION: This study was conducted to evaluate the relationship between lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and erectile dysfunction (ED) in aging males of Taiwan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A free health screening for aging males (>or=45 years old) was conducted in Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital in August 2004. LUTS and ED were assessed by validated symptom scales: the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5). The subjects also completed a health and demographics questionnaire and underwent detailed physical examination, serum prostate-specific antigen level determination, and transrectal ultrasonography. RESULTS: The final study population consisted of 141 patients with a mean age of 59.8 years. The severity of LUTS and ED increased with age. After controlling for comorbidities, age (p<0.001) and IPSS score (p<0.001) were significantly associated with the IIEF-5 score. Furthermore, men with moderate to high IPSS scores were more likely to have ED as compared with those with mild symptoms after age adjustment (age-adjusted odds ratio 3.27, p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: ED and LUTS are highly prevalent in our study population, and this prevalence increases with age. ED is significantly associated with the severity of LUTS after controlling for age and comorbidities. These results highlight the clinical importance of evaluating LUTS in patients with ED and the need to consider sexual issues in the management of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.