Exchange protein directly activated by cAMP plays a critical role in bacterial invasion during fatal rickettsioses

Rickettsiae are responsible for some of the most devastating human infections. A high infectivity and severe illness after inhalation make some rickettsiae bioterrorism threats. We report that deletion of the exchange protein directly activated by cAMP (Epac) gene, Epac1, in mice protects them from an ordinarily lethal dose of rickettsiae. Inhibition of Epac1 suppresses bacterial adhesion and invasion. Most importantly, pharmacological inhibition of Epac1 in vivo using an Epac-specific small-molecule inhibitor, ESI-09, completely recapitulates the Epac1 knockout phenotype. ESI-09 treatment dramatically decreases the morbidity and mortality associated with fatal spotted fever rickettsiosis. Our results demonstrate that Epac1-mediated signaling represents a mechanism for host–pathogen interactions and that Epac1 is a potential target for the prevention and treatment of fatal rickettsioses.Rickettsiae are responsible for some of the most devastating human infections (1–4). It has been forecasted that temperature increases attributable to global climate change will lead to more widespread distribution of rickettsioses (5). These tick-borne diseases are caused by obligately intracellular bacteria of the genus Rickettsia, including Rickettsia rickettsii, the causative agent of Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) in the United States and Latin America (2, 3), and Rickettsia conorii, the causative agent of Mediterranean spotted fever endemic to southern Europe, North Africa, and India (6). A high infectivity and severe illness after inhalation make some rickettsiae (including Rickettsia prowazekii, R. rickettsii, Rickettsia typhi, and R. conorii) bioterrorism threats (7). Although the majority of rickettsial infections can be controlled by appropriate broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy if diagnosed early, up to 20% of misdiagnosed or untreated (1, 3) and 5% of treated RMSF cases (8) result in a fatal outcome caused by acute disseminated vascular endothelial infection and damage (9). Fatality rates as high as 32% have been reported in hospitalized patients diagnosed with Mediterranean spotted fever (10). In addition, strains of R. prowazekii resistant to tetracycline and chloramphenicol have been developed in laboratories (11). Disseminated endothelial infection and endothelial barrier disruption with increased microvascular permeability are the central features of SFG rickettsioses (1, 2, 9). The molecular mechanisms involved in rickettsial infection remain incompletely elucidated (9, 12). A comprehensive understanding of rickettsial pathogenesis and the development of novel mechanism-based treatment are urgently needed.Living organisms use intricate signaling networks for sensing and responding to changes in the external environment. cAMP, a ubiquitous second messenger, is an important molecular switch that translates environmental signals into regulatory effects in cells (13). As such, a number of microbial pathogens have evolved a set of diverse virulence-enhancing strategies that exploit the cAMP-signaling pathways of their hosts (14). The intracellular functions of cAMP are predominantly mediated by the classic cAMP receptor, protein kinase A (PKA), and the more recently discovered exchange protein directly activated by cAMP (Epac) (15). Thus, far, two isoforms, Epac1 and Epac2, have been identified in humans (16, 17). Epac proteins function by responding to increased intracellular cAMP levels and activating the Ras superfamily small GTPases Ras-proximate 1 and 2 (Rap1 and Rap2). Accumulating evidence demonstrates that the cAMP/Epac1 signaling axis plays key regulatory roles in controlling various cellular functions in endothelial cells in vitro, including cell adhesion (18–21), exocytosis (22), tissue plasminogen activator expression (23), suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS-3) induction (24–27), microtubule dynamics (28, 29), cell–cell junctions, and permeability and barrier functions (30–37). Considering the critical importance of endothelial cells in rickettsioses, we examined the functional roles of Epac1 in rickettsial pathogenesis in vivo, taking advantage of the recently generated Epac1 knockout mouse (38) and Epac-specific inhibitors (39, 40) generated from our laboratory. Our studies demonstrate that Epac1 plays a key role in rickettsial infection and represents a therapeutic target for fatal rickettsioses.     

Predictive Value of Brain Natriuretic Peptides in Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis: Results from the ADEMEX Trial

Background and objectives: Natriuretic peptides have been suggested to be of value in risk stratification in dialysis patients. Data in patients on peritoneal dialysis remain limited.Design, setting, participants, & measurements: Patients of the ADEMEX trial (ADEquacy of peritoneal dialysis in MEXico) were randomized to a control group [standard 4 × 2L continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD); n = 484] and an intervention group (CAPD with a target creatinine clearance ≥60L/wk/1.73 m²; n = 481). Natriuretic peptides were measured at baseline and correlated with other parameters as well as evaluated for effects on patient outcomes.Results: Control group and intervention group were comparable at baseline with respect to all measured parameters. Baseline values of natriuretic peptides were elevated and correlated significantly with levels of residual renal function but not with body size or diabetes. Baseline values of N-terminal fragment of B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) but not proANP(1–30), proANP(31–67), or proANP(1–98) were independently highly predictive of overall survival and cardiovascular mortality. Volume removal was also significantly correlated with patient survival.Conclusions. NT-proBNP have a significant predictive value for survival of CAPD patients and may be of value in guiding risk stratification and potentially targeted therapeutic interventions.Plasma levels of cardiac natriuretic peptides are elevated in patients with chronic kidney disease, owing to impairment of renal function, hypertension, hypervolemia, and/or concomitant heart disease (1–7). Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and particularly brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels are linked independently to left ventricular mass (3–5,8–16) and function (3,6–17) and predict total and cardiovascular mortality (1,3,8,10,12,18) as well as cardiac events (12,19). ANP and BNP decrease significantly during hemodialysis treatment but increase again during the interdialytic interval (1,2,4,6,7,14,17,20–23). Levels in patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) have been found to be lower than in patients on hemodialysis (11,24–26), but the correlations with left ventricular function and structure are maintained in both types of dialysis modalities (11,15,27,28).The high mortality of patients on peritoneal dialysis and the failure of dialytic interventions to alter this mortality (29,30) necessitate renewed attention into novel methods of stratification and identification of patients at highest risk to be targeted for specific interventions. Cardiac natriuretic peptides are increasingly considered to fulfill this role in nonrenal patients. Evaluations of cardiac natriuretic peptides in patients on PD have been limited by small numbers (3,9,11,12,15,24–26) and only one study examined correlations between natriuretic peptide levels and outcomes (12). The PD population enrolled in the ADEMEX trial offered us the opportunity to evaluate cardiac natriuretic peptides and their value in predicting outcomes in the largest clinical trial ever performed on PD (29,30). It is hoped that such an evaluation would identify patients at risk even in the absence of overt clinical disease and hence facilitate or encourage interventions with salutary outcomes.     

N terminus of ASPP2 binds to Ras and enhances Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK activation to promote oncogene-induced senescence

The ASPP2 (also known as 53BP2L) tumor suppressor is a proapoptotic member of a family of p53 binding proteins that functions in part by enhancing p53-dependent apoptosis via its C-terminal p53-binding domain. Mounting evidence also suggests that ASPP2 harbors important nonapoptotic p53-independent functions. Structural studies identify a small G protein Ras-association domain in the ASPP2 N terminus. Because Ras-induced senescence is a barrier to tumor formation in normal cells, we investigated whether ASPP2 could bind Ras and stimulate the protein kinase Raf/MEK/ERK signaling cascade. We now show that ASPP2 binds to Ras–GTP at the plasma membrane and stimulates Ras-induced signaling and pERK1/2 levels via promoting Ras–GTP loading, B-Raf/C-Raf dimerization, and C-Raf phosphorylation. These functions require the ASPP2 N terminus because BBP (also known as 53BP2S), an alternatively spliced ASPP2 isoform lacking the N terminus, was defective in binding Ras–GTP and stimulating Raf/MEK/ERK signaling. Decreased ASPP2 levels attenuated H-RasV12–induced senescence in normal human fibroblasts and neonatal human epidermal keratinocytes. Together, our results reveal a mechanism for ASPP2 tumor suppressor function via direct interaction with Ras–GTP to stimulate Ras-induced senescence in nontransformed human cells.ASPP2, also known as 53BP2L, is a tumor suppressor whose expression is altered in human cancers (1). Importantly, targeting of the ASPP2 allele in two different mouse models reveals that ASPP2 heterozygous mice are prone to spontaneous and γ-irradiation–induced tumors, which rigorously demonstrates the role of ASPP2 as a tumor suppressor (2, 3). ASPP2 binds p53 via the C-terminal ankyrin-repeat and SH3 domain (4–6), is damage-inducible, and can enhance damage-induced apoptosis in part through a p53-mediated pathway (1, 2, 7–10). However, it remains unclear what biologic pathways and mechanisms mediate ASPP2 tumor suppressor function (1). Indeed, accumulating evidence demonstrates that ASPP2 also mediates nonapoptotic p53-independent pathways (1, 3, 11–15).The induction of cellular senescence forms an important barrier to tumorigenesis in vivo (16–21). It is well known that oncogenic Ras signaling induces senescence in normal nontransformed cells to prevent tumor initiation and maintain complex growth arrest pathways (16, 18, 21–24). The level of oncogenic Ras activation influences its capacity to activate senescence; high levels of oncogenic H-RasV12 signaling leads to low grade tumors with senescence markers, which progress to invasive cancers upon senescence inactivation (25). Thus, tight control of Ras signaling is critical to ensure the proper biologic outcome in the correct cellular context (26–28).The ASPP2 C terminus is important for promoting p53-dependent apoptosis (7). The ASPP2 N terminus may also suppress cell growth (1, 7, 29–33). Alternative splicing can generate the ASPP2 N-terminal truncated protein BBP (also known as 53BP2S) that is less potent in suppressing cell growth (7, 34, 35). Although the ASPP2 C terminus mediates nuclear localization, full-length ASPP2 also localizes to the cytoplasm and plasma membrane to mediate extranuclear functions (7, 11, 12, 36). Structural studies of the ASPP2 N terminus reveal a β–Grasp ubiquitin-like fold as well as a potential Ras-binding (RB)/Ras-association (RA) domain (32). Moreover, ASPP2 can promote H-RasV12–induced senescence (13, 15). However, the molecular mechanism(s) of how ASPP2 directly promotes Ras signaling are complex and remain to be completely elucidated.Here, we explore the molecular mechanisms of how Ras-signaling is enhanced by ASPP2. We demonstrate that ASPP2: (i) binds Ras-GTP and stimulates Ras-induced ERK signaling via its N-terminal domain at the plasma membrane; (ii) enhances Ras-GTP loading and B-Raf/C-Raf dimerization and forms a ASPP2/Raf complex; (iii) stimulates Ras-induced C-Raf phosphorylation and activation; and (iv) potentiates H-RasV12–induced senescence in both primary human fibroblasts and neonatal human epidermal keratinocytes. These data provide mechanistic insight into ASPP2 function(s) and opens important avenues for investigation into its role as a tumor suppressor in human cancer.     

Reconstitution of long and short patch mismatch repair reactions using Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins

A problem in understanding eukaryotic DNA mismatch repair (MMR) mechanisms is linking insights into MMR mechanisms from genetics and cell-biology studies with those from biochemical studies of MMR proteins and reconstituted MMR reactions. This type of analysis has proven difficult because reconstitution approaches have been most successful for human MMR whereas analysis of MMR in vivo has been most advanced in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here, we describe the reconstitution of MMR reactions using purified S. cerevisiae proteins and mispair-containing DNA substrates. A mixture of MutS homolog 2 (Msh2)–MutS homolog 6, Exonuclease 1, replication protein A, replication factor C-Δ1N, proliferating cell nuclear antigen and DNA polymerase δ was found to repair substrates containing TG, CC, +1 (+T), +2 (+GC), and +4 (+ACGA) mispairs and either a 5′ or 3′ strand interruption with different efficiencies. The Msh2–MutS homolog 3 mispair recognition protein could substitute for the Msh2–Msh6 mispair recognition protein and showed a different specificity of repair of the different mispairs whereas addition of MutL homolog 1–postmeiotic segregation 1 had no affect on MMR. Repair was catalytic, with as many as 11 substrates repaired per molecule of Exo1. Repair of the substrates containing either a 5′ or 3′ strand interruption occurred by mispair binding-dependent 5′ excision and subsequent resynthesis with excision tracts of up to ∼2.9 kb occurring during the repair of the substrate with a 3′ strand interruption. The availability of this reconstituted MMR reaction now makes possible detailed biochemical studies of the wealth of mutations identified that affect S. cerevisiae MMR.DNA mismatch repair (MMR) is a critical DNA repair pathway that is coupled to DNA replication in eukaryotes where it corrects misincorporation errors made during DNA replication (1–9). This pathway prevents mutations and acts to prevent the development of cancer (10, 11). MMR also contributes to gene conversion by repairing mispaired bases that occur during the formation of recombination intermediates (3, 4, 12). Finally, MMR acts to suppress recombination between divergent but homologous DNA sequences, thereby preventing the formation of genome rearrangements that can result from nonallelic homologous recombination (4, 13–15).Our knowledge of the mechanism of eukaryotic MMR comes from several general lines of investigation (3–9). Studies of bacterial MMR have provided a basic mechanistic framework for comparative studies (5). Genetic and cell-biology studies, primarily in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, have identified eukaryotic MMR genes, provided models for how their gene products define MMR pathways, and elucidated some of the details of how MMR pathways interact with replication (1–4). Reconstitution studies, primarily in human systems, have identified some of the catalytic features of eukaryotic MMR (7–9, 16, 17). Biochemical and structural studies of S. cerevisiae and human MMR proteins have provided information about the function of individual MMR proteins (6–9).In eukaryotic MMR, mispairs are bound by MutS homolog 2 (Msh2)–MutS homolog 6 (Msh6) and Msh2–MutS homolog 3 (Msh3), two partially redundant complexes of MutS-related proteins (3, 4, 18, 19). These complexes recruit a MutL-related complex, called MutL homoloh 1 (Mlh1)–postmeiotic segregation 1 (Pms1) in S. cerevisiae and Mlh1–postmeiotic segregation 2 (Pms2) in human and mouse (3, 4, 20–23). The Mlh1–Pms1/Pms2 complex has an endonuclease activity suggested to play a role in the initiation of the excision step of MMR (24, 25). Downstream of mismatch recognition is a mispair excision step that can be catalyzed by Exonuclease 1 (Exo1) (26–28); however, defects in both S. cerevisiae and mouse Exo1 result in only a partial MMR deficiency, suggesting the existence of additional excision mechanisms (26, 27, 29). DNA polymerase δ, the single-strand DNA binding protein replication protein A (RPA), the sliding clamp proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), and the clamp loader replication factor C (RFC) are also required for MMR at different steps, including activation of Mlh1–Pms1/Pms2, stimulation of Exo1, potentially in Exo1-independent mispair excision, and in the gap-filling resynthesis steps of MMR (3, 16, 17, 24, 27, 30–36). Although much is known about these core MMR proteins, it is not well understood how eukaryotic MMR is coupled to DNA replication (1, 2), how excision is targeted to the newly replicated strand (1, 25, 37–39), or how different MMR mechanisms such as Exo1-dependent and -independent subpathways are selected or how many such subpathways exist (1, 24, 27, 29).S. cerevisiae has provided a number of tools for studying MMR, including forward genetic screens for mutations affecting MMR, including dominant and separation-of-function mutations, the ability to evaluate structure-based mutations in vivo, cell biological tools for visualizing and analyzing MMR proteins in vivo, and overproduction of individual MMR proteins for biochemical analysis. However, linking these tools with biochemical systems that catalyze MMR reactions in vitro for mechanistic studies has not yet been possible. Here, we describe the development of MMR reactions reconstituted using purified proteins for the analysis of MMR mechanisms.     

Shigella reroutes host cell central metabolism to obtain high-flux nutrient supply for vigorous intracellular growth

Shigella flexneri proliferate in infected human epithelial cells at exceptionally high rates. This vigorous growth has important consequences for rapid progression to life-threatening bloody diarrhea, but the underlying metabolic mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here, we used metabolomics, proteomics, and genetic experiments to determine host and Shigella metabolism during infection in a cell culture model. The data suggest that infected host cells maintain largely normal fluxes through glycolytic pathways, but the entire output of these pathways is captured by Shigella, most likely in the form of pyruvate. This striking strategy provides Shigella with an abundant favorable energy source, while preserving host cell ATP generation, energy charge maintenance, and survival, despite ongoing vigorous exploitation. Shigella uses a simple three-step pathway to metabolize pyruvate at high rates with acetate as an excreted waste product. The crucial role of this pathway for Shigella intracellular growth suggests targets for antimicrobial chemotherapy of this devastating disease.Infectious diseases typically arise when pathogens grow to high tissue loads, causing extensive damage and immunopathology. An outstanding example is Shigella flexneri, which rapidly grow from a small infectious dose of 10–100 bacteria (1) to intestinal loads causing life-threatening bloody diarrhea (bacillary dysentery) within a few hours (2, 3). This vigorous Shigella growth occurs inside human colon epithelial cells and requires an integrated Shigella pathogenesis program, including a type three secretion system encoded on the Shigella virulence plasmid. Using this system, Shigella translocates enzymes into the host cell cytosol, where they target key cellular functions, allowing Shigella to enter the host cell and escape bacterial killing by innate immune responses (4). After Shigella reaches the host cell cytosol, many virulence factors are down-regulated (5), and Shigella starts rapid proliferation.Biomass generation at such high rates depends on extensive exploitation of intracellular host nutrients (6). The host cell cytoplasm contains hundreds of metabolites, but it is unclear which of these potential nutrients Shigella uses, how the host cell can supply them at sufficiently high rates to support rapid Shigella growth, and why host cells can sustain viability while being vigorously exploited by intracellular Shigella. For related enteroinvasive Escherichia coli, previous research has shown that glucose and other host metabolites, such as diverse amino acids, can be incorporated into the biomass of these closely related pathogens (7). However, quantitative data are still lacking, and energy production, which is usually a major part of nutrient use (8), could not be analyzed because of technical limitations.In general, pathogen metabolism has been recognized as a fundamentally important aspect of infectious diseases, but available data are mostly restricted to qualitative presence/absence of enzymes in pathogen genomes and metabolite or gene expression profiles in various infection models (9–13). Comprehensive quantitative studies on pathogen nutrition, metabolism, and growth are largely lacking. This limited knowledge reflects, in part, the fact that suitable methodologies are just becoming available. In this study, we combined various metabolomics approaches, proteomics, and microbial genetics to elucidate the metabolic basis of Shigella rapid growth in infected human host cells.     

Visualization of the type III secretion sorting platform of Shigella flexneri

Bacterial type III secretion machines are widely used to inject virulence proteins into eukaryotic host cells. These secretion machines are evolutionarily related to bacterial flagella and consist of a large cytoplasmic complex, a transmembrane basal body, and an extracellular needle. The cytoplasmic complex forms a sorting platform essential for effector selection and needle assembly, but it remains largely uncharacterized. Here we use high-throughput cryoelectron tomography (cryo-ET) to visualize intact machines in a virulent Shigella flexneri strain genetically modified to produce minicells capable of interaction with host cells. A high-resolution in situ structure of the intact machine determined by subtomogram averaging reveals the cytoplasmic sorting platform, which consists of a central hub and six spokes, with a pod-like structure at the terminus of each spoke. Molecular modeling of wild-type and mutant machines allowed us to propose a model of the sorting platform in which the hub consists mainly of a hexamer of the Spa47 ATPase, whereas the MxiN protein comprises the spokes and the Spa33 protein forms the pods. Multiple contacts among those components are essential to align the Spa47 ATPase with the central channel of the MxiA protein export gate to form a unique nanomachine. The molecular architecture of the Shigella type III secretion machine and its sorting platform provide the structural foundation for further dissecting the mechanisms underlying type III secretion and pathogenesis and also highlight the major structural distinctions from bacterial flagella.Type III secretion systems (T3SSs) are essential virulence determinants for many Gram-negative pathogens. The injectisome, also known as the needle complex, is the central T3SS machine required to inject effector proteins from the bacterium into eukaryotic host cells (1, 2). The injectisome has three major components: an extracellular needle, a basal body, and a cytoplasmic complex (3). Contact with a host cell membrane triggers activation of the injectisome and the insertion of a translocon pore into the target cell membrane. The entire complex then serves as a conduit for direct translocation of effectors (1, 2). Assembly of a functional T3SS requires recognition and sorting of specific secretion substrates in a well-defined order by the cytoplasmic complex (4, 5). Furthermore, genes encoding the cytoplasmic complex are regulated by physical and environmental signals (6), providing temporal control of the injection of effector proteins and thereby optimizing invasion and virulence.Significant progress has been made in elucidating T3SS structures from many different bacteria (7, 8). 3D reconstructions of purified injectisomes from Salmonella and Shigella, together with the atomic structures of major basal body proteins, have provided a detailed view of basal body architecture (9, 10). Recent in situ structures of injectisomes from Shigella flexneri, Salmonella enterica, and Yersinia enterocolitica revealed an export gate and the structural flexibility of the basal body (11, 12). Unfortunately, these in situ structures from intact bacteria (11, 12) did not reveal any evident densities related to the proposed model of the cytoplasmic complex (8, 13).The flagellar C ring is the cytoplasmic complex in evolutionarily related flagellar systems. It is composed of flagellar proteins FliG, FliM, and FliN and plays an essential role in flagellar assembly, rotation, and switching (14). Large drum-shaped structures of the flagellar C ring have been determined in both purified basal bodies (15, 16) and in situ motors (17–19). Similarly, electron microscopy analysis in Shigella indicated that the Spa33 protein (a homolog of the flagellar proteins FliN and FliM) is localized beneath the basal body via interactions with MxiG and MxiJ and is an essential component of the putative C ring (20). Recent experimental evidence suggests that the putative C ring provides a sorting platform for the recognition and secretion of the substrates in S. enterica (5). This sorting platform consists of three proteins, SpaO, OrgA, and OrgB, which are highly conserved among other T3SSs (21) (SI Appendix, Table S1). Despite its critical roles, little is still known about the structure and assembly of the cytoplasmic sorting platform in T3SS. In this study, we choose S. flexneri as a model system to study the intact T3SS machine and its cytoplasmic complex, mainly because a wealth of structural, biochemical, and functional information is available for the S. flexneri T3SS (22).     

Intracellular Shigella remodels its LPS to dampen the innate immune recognition and evade inflammasome activation

LPS is a potent bacterial effector triggering the activation of the innate immune system following binding with the complex CD14, myeloid differentiation protein 2, and Toll-like receptor 4. The LPS of the enteropathogen Shigella flexneri is a hexa-acylated isoform possessing an optimal inflammatory activity. Symptoms of shigellosis are produced by severe inflammation caused by the invasion process of Shigella in colonic and rectal mucosa. Here we addressed the question of the role played by the Shigella LPS in eliciting a dysregulated inflammatory response of the host. We unveil that (i) Shigella is able to modify the LPS composition, e.g., the lipid A and core domains, during proliferation within epithelial cells; (ii) the LPS of intracellular bacteria (iLPS) and that of bacteria grown in laboratory medium differ in the number of acyl chains in lipid A, with iLPS being the hypoacylated; (iii) the immunopotential of iLPS is dramatically lower than that of bacteria grown in laboratory medium; (iv) both LPS forms mainly signal through the Toll-like receptor 4/myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 pathway; (v) iLPS down-regulates the inflammasome-mediated release of IL-1β in Shigella-infected macrophages; and (vi) iLPS exhibits a reduced capacity to prime polymorfonuclear cells for an oxidative burst. We propose a working model whereby the two forms of LPS might govern different steps of the invasive process of Shigella. In the first phases, the bacteria, decorated with hypoacylated LPS, are able to lower the immune system surveillance, whereas, in the late phases, shigellae harboring immunopotent LPS are fully recognized by the immune system, which can then successfully resolve the infection.LPS is a glycolipid located in the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. It is composed of three covalently linked domains: lipid A, which is embedded in the outer membrane; the oligosaccharide core; and the O-polysaccharide or O-antigen, which cover the bacterial surface. During infections sustained by Gram-negative bacteria, detection of LPS initiates an acute inflammatory response as LPS, mainly by the lipid A, which is the real pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP), is sensed by the innate immune system, through the binding to the pattern recognition receptor (PRR) complex of myeloid differentiation protein 2 (MD-2) and Toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 (TLR4) (1–3). The downstream effects of LPS recognition elicit effector mechanisms aimed at pathogen eradication. However, LPS can also elicit an host reaction because it is a major mediator of pathologic processes (4). The strength of the innate immune response to LPS can be modulated by its chemical structure; specifically, a fine tuning of the lipid A structure can significantly affect the immunostimulatory properties of the whole LPS molecule (5, 6). There is a strong correlation between the number of acyl chains of lipid A and the immunological response via the TLR4 pathway. In general, hexaacylated lipid A species are agonists, whereas tetraacylated species are antagonists with a weak inflammatory potential (7). Gram-negative bacteria can synthesize a range of differentially acylated LPSs as a result of the LPS biosynthesis. Changes in lipid A acylation underlie the adaptation of pathogens to different hosts, such as Yersinia pestis (8), or to different phases of pathogenesis such as Salmonella typhimurium (9) or in the establishment of chronic infection such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10, 11).Shigella flexneri is a Gram-negative pathogen that infects humans. The ingestion of as few as 100 bacteria is sufficient to cause bacillary dysentery, a severe rectocolitis caused by the dramatic inflammatory reaction induced by Shigella invasion on the colonic and rectal mucosa (12). Shigella enters epithelial cells by injecting effectors via a type III secretion system (T3SS) (13), escapes from the phagocytic vacuole, and actively proliferates within the cytosol of infected cells (14, 15). Bacterial proliferation is a potent signal to initiate inflammation because intracellular shigellae activate NF-κB following recognition of peptidoglycan (PGN) by the PRR Nod1, leading to IL-8 production (16, 17). IL-8 attracts neutrophils that are required for the clearance of shigellae, but also participates in epithelial barrier destruction (18). In macrophages, Shigella is able to trigger the assembly of the inflammasome, an important defense mechanism that is part of the innate immune system (19). The inflammasome is a multiprotein complex that mediates activation of caspase-1, which promotes the secretion of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-18 as well as a cell death process called pyroptosis (20, 21). Different PRRs, i.e., TLRs and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptors (NLRs) contribute to the inflammasome assembly (22). In Shigella-infected macrophages, the activation of the NLRC4-mediated inflammasome triggers cell death and release of IL-1β and IL-18 (19, 23). Indeed, production of IL-1β is a paradigm of shigellosis: the chief role of this cytokine has been highlighted in vivo in several studies (24–26).In tissues of animals and in ex vivo human samples infected with Shigella (27), a huge amount of LPS is usually observed, reflecting the presence of living bacteria and/or of processed molecules. However, whether, how, and at to what extent this mass of LPS present in Shigella-infected tissues could play a role in the inflammation remains largely unknown.In 2002, D’Hauteville et al. reported that, in S. flexneri, the lack of msbB genes, msbB1 and msbB2, both encoding the enzyme myristoyl transferase, reduces lipid A acylation degree along with TNF-α production and epithelial lining inflammatory destruction in a rabbit model of Shigella infection (28, 29). This study suggests that LPS composition can greatly influence the degree of inflammation induced by Shigella.In line with these issues, here we intend to contribute to the understanding of the role played by LPS in Shigella pathogenesis. Hence, we addressed the question of whether Shigella could adapt the LPS structure to the host thereby exploiting the mechanism of LPS modification to hijack the innate immune response. With this aim, we extracted, purified, and analyzed the LPS of shigellae resident in epithelial cells. We detailed the immunopotential of this structure and compared it to that of conventionally grown bacteria. Together our results point to a key role for LPS during the Shigella invasive process.We report that (i) Shigella is able to modify the LPS composition, e.g., the lipid A and core domains, during proliferation within epithelial cells; (ii) the LPS of intracellular bacteria (iLPS) and that of bacteria conventionally grown (aLPS) differ in the number of acyl chains in lipid A, with iLPS being hypoacylated; (iii) the immunopotential of iLPS is dramatically lower than that of aLPS; (iv) both LPS forms signal mainly through the TLR4/MyD88 pathway; (v) iLPS influences the inflammasome-mediated production of IL-1β in Shigella-infected macrophages; and (vi) iLPS exhibits a reduced capacity to prime PMNs for an oxidative burst.     

Drosophila seminal protein ovulin mediates ovulation through female octopamine neuronal signaling

Across animal taxa, seminal proteins are important regulators of female reproductive physiology and behavior. However, little is understood about the physiological or molecular mechanisms by which seminal proteins effect these changes. To investigate this topic, we studied the increase in Drosophila melanogaster ovulation behavior induced by mating. Ovulation requires octopamine (OA) signaling from the central nervous system to coordinate an egg’s release from the ovary and its passage into the oviduct. The seminal protein ovulin increases ovulation rates after mating. We tested whether ovulin acts through OA to increase ovulation behavior. Increasing OA neuronal excitability compensated for a lack of ovulin received during mating. Moreover, we identified a mating-dependent relaxation of oviduct musculature, for which ovulin is a necessary and sufficient male contribution. We report further that oviduct muscle relaxation can be induced by activating OA neurons, requires normal metabolic production of OA, and reflects ovulin’s increasing of OA neuronal signaling. Finally, we showed that as a result of ovulin exposure, there is subsequent growth of OA synaptic sites at the oviduct, demonstrating that seminal proteins can contribute to synaptic plasticity. Together, these results demonstrate that ovulin increases ovulation through OA neuronal signaling and, by extension, that seminal proteins can alter reproductive physiology by modulating known female pathways regulating reproduction.Throughout internally fertilizing animals, seminal proteins play important roles in regulating female fertility by altering female physiology and, in some cases, behavior after mating (reviewed in refs. 1–3). Despite this, little is understood about the physiological mechanisms by which seminal proteins induce postmating changes and how their actions are linked with known networks regulating female reproductive physiology.In Drosophila melanogaster, the suite of seminal proteins has been identified, as have many seminal protein-dependent postmating responses, including changes in egg production and laying, remating behavior, locomotion, feeding, and in ovulation rate (reviewed in refs. 2 and 3). For example, the Drosophila seminal protein ovulin elevates ovulation rate to maximal levels during the 24 h following mating (4, 5), and the seminal protein sex peptide (SP) suppresses female mating receptivity and increases egg-laying behavior for several days after mating (6–10). However, although a receptor for SP has been identified (11), along with elements of the neural circuit in which it is required (12–14), SP’s mechanism of action has not yet been linked to regulatory networks known to control postmating behaviors. Thus, a crucial question remains: how do male-derived seminal proteins interact with regulatory networks in females to trigger postmating responses?We addressed this question by examining the stimulation of Drosophila ovulation by the seminal protein ovulin. In insects, ovulation, defined here as the release of an egg from the ovary to the uterus, is among the best understood reproductive processes in terms of its physiology and neurogenetics (15–27). In D. melanogaster, ovulation requires input from neurons in the abdominal ganglia that release the catecholaminergic neuromodulators octopamine (OA) and tyramine (17, 18, 28). Drosophila ovulation also requires an OA receptor, OA receptor in mushroom bodies (OAMB) (19, 20). Moreover, it has been proposed that OA may integrate extrinsic factors to regulate ovulation rates (17). Noradrenaline, the vertebrate structural and functional equivalent to OA (29, 30), is important for mammalian ovulation, and its dysregulation has been associated with ovulation disorders (31–38). In this paper we investigate the role of neurons that release OA and tyramine in ovulin’s action. For simplicity, we refer to these neurons as “OA neurons” to reflect the well-established role of OA in ovulation behavior (16–20, 22).We investigated how action of the seminal protein ovulin relates to the conserved canonical neuromodulatory pathway that regulates ovulation physiology (39–41). We found that ovulin increases ovulation and egg laying through OA neuronal signaling. We also found that ovulin relaxes oviduct muscle tonus, a postmating process that is also mediated by OA neuronal signaling. Finally, subsequent to these effects we detected an ovulin-dependent increase in synaptic sites between OA motor neurons and oviduct muscle, suggesting that ovulin’s stimulation of OA neurons could have increased their synaptic activity. These results suggest that ovulin affects ovulation by manipulating the gain of a neuromodulatory pathway regulating ovulation physiology.     

Potentiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy by growth hormone-releasing hormone agonists

The dismal prognosis of malignant brain tumors drives the development of new treatment modalities. In view of the multiple activities of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH), we hypothesized that pretreatment with a GHRH agonist, JI-34, might increase the susceptibility of U-87 MG glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) cells to subsequent treatment with the cytotoxic drug, doxorubicin (DOX). This concept was corroborated by our findings, in vivo, showing that the combination of the GHRH agonist, JI-34, and DOX inhibited the growth of GBM tumors, transplanted into nude mice, more than DOX alone. In vitro, the pretreatment of GBM cells with JI-34 potentiated inhibitory effects of DOX on cell proliferation, diminished cell size and viability, and promoted apoptotic processes, as shown by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide proliferation assay, ApoLive-Glo multiplex assay, and cell volumetric assay. Proteomic studies further revealed that the pretreatment with GHRH agonist evoked differentiation decreasing the expression of the neuroectodermal stem cell antigen, nestin, and up-regulating the glial maturation marker, GFAP. The GHRH agonist also reduced the release of humoral regulators of glial growth, such as FGF basic and TGFβ. Proteomic and gene-expression (RT-PCR) studies confirmed the strong proapoptotic activity (increase in p53, decrease in v-myc and Bcl-2) and anti-invasive potential (decrease in integrin α3) of the combination of GHRH agonist and DOX. These findings indicate that the GHRH agonists can potentiate the anticancer activity of the traditional chemotherapeutic drug, DOX, by multiple mechanisms including the induction of differentiation of cancer cells.Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is one of the most aggressive human cancers, and the afflicted patients inevitably succumb. The dismal outcome of this malignancy demands great efforts to find improved methods of treatment (1). Many compounds have been synthesized in our laboratory in the past few years that have proven to be effective against diverse malignant tumors (2–14). These are peptide analogs of hypothalamic hormones: luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH), growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH), somatostatin, and analogs of other neuropeptides such as bombesin and gastrin-releasing peptide. The receptors for these peptides have been found to be widely distributed in the human body, including in many types of cancers (2–14). The regulatory functions of these hypothalamic hormones and other neuropeptides are not confined to the hypothalamo–hypophyseal system or, even more broadly, to the central nervous system (CNS). In particular, GHRH can induce the differentiation of ovarian granulosa cells and other cells in the reproductive system and function as a growth factor in various normal tissues, benign tumors, and malignancies (2–4, 6, 11, 14–18). Previously, we also reported that antagonistic cytototoxic derivatives of some of these neuropeptides are able to inhibit the growth of several malignant cell lines (2–14).Our earlier studies showed that treatment with antagonists of LHRH or GHRH rarely effects complete regression of glioblastoma-derived tumors (5, 7, 10, 11). Previous studies also suggested that growth factors such as EGF or agonistic analogs of LHRH serving as carriers for cytotoxic analogs and functioning as growth factors may sensitize cancer cells to cytotoxic treatments (10, 19) through the activation of maturation processes. We therefore hypothesized that pretreatment with one of our GHRH agonists, such as JI-34 (20), which has shown effects on growth and differentiation in other cell lines (17, 18, 21, 22), might decrease the pluripotency and the adaptability of GBM cells and thereby increase their susceptibility to cytotoxic treatment.In vivo, tumor cells were implanted into athymic nude mice, tumor growth was recorded weekly, and final tumor mass was measured upon autopsy. In vitro, proliferation assays were used for the determination of neoplastic proliferation and cell growth. Changes in stem (nestin) and maturation (GFAP) antigen expression was evaluated with Western blot studies in vivo and with immunocytochemistry in vitro. The production of glial growth factors (FGF basic, TGFβ) was verified by ELISA. Further, using the Human Cancer Pathway Finder real-time quantitative PCR, numerous genes that play a role in the development of cancer were evaluated. We placed particular emphasis on the measurement of apoptosis, using the ApoLive-Glo Multiplex Assay kit and by detection of the expression of the proapoptotic p53 protein. This overall approach permitted the evaluation of the effect of GHRH agonist, JI-34, on the response to chemotherapy with doxorubicin.