Outcomes of palliative surgery for bone metastasis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the era of targeted therapy

IntroductionThe introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors has revolutionized treatment strategies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and has improved survival rates. The number of patients with bone metastases from RCC requiring surgery will increase as survival rates improve. However, there is insufficient evidence to standardize the treatment of bone metastases after the introduction of targeted therapy for metastatic RCC. We aimed to determine the outcomes of palliative surgical treatment of bone metastases in the extremities of patients with metastatic RCC.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 26 lesions from 17 patients who underwent surgery for extremity and acetabular bone metastases and were treated with targeted therapies for advanced RCC between 2008 and 2020. The median follow-up duration was 19 months (range, 4–76). We assessed the patients’ activities of daily living, quality of life, and pain and analyzed their postoperative values relative to preoperative values. Postoperative overall survival (OS), local progression-free survival (LPFS), and the factors affecting them were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.ResultsThe 5-year OS and LPFS rates were 39.5% and 65.6%, respectively. The factors affecting OS were sex, Katagiri score, visceral metastases, and preoperative targeted therapy, while the factors affecting LPFS were pathologic fractures and surgical technique.ConclusionIn this study, the postoperative outcomes of palliative surgery for bone metastases from metastatic RCC were good. We suggest that systemic treatment should be prioritized over local control for advanced bone metastasis in RCC and surgery before pathological fracture should be performed for local control.     

Targeted agents in metastatic Xp11 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion renal cell carcinoma (RCC): a report from the Juvenile RCC Network

BackgroundXp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is an RCC subtype affecting 15% of RCC patients <45 years. We analyzed the benefit of targeted therapy [vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-targeted agents and/or mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors] in these patients.Patients and methodsPatients with Xp11 translocation/TFE3 fusion gene metastatic RCC who had received targeted therapy were identified. Nuclear TFE3 positivity was confirmed by reviewing pathology slides. Responses according to RECIST criteria, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.ResultsOverall, 53 patients were identified; 23 had metastatic disease, and of these 21 had received targeted therapy (median age 34 years). Seven patients achieved an objective response. In first line, median PFS was 8.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.6–14.7 months] for sunitinib (n = 11) versus 2 months (95% CI 0.8–3.3 months) for cytokines (n = 9) (log-rank P = 0.003). Results for further treatment (second, third, or fourth line) were as follows: all three patients receiving sunitinib had a partial response (median PFS 11 months). Seven of eight patients receiving sorafenib had stable disease (median PFS 6 months). One patient receiving mTOR inhibitors had a partial response and six patients had stable disease. Median OS was 27 months with a 19 months median follow-up.ConclusionIn Xp11 translocation RCC, targeted therapy achieved objective responses and prolonged PFS similar to those reported for clear-cell RCC.     

Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with renal cell carcinoma in the UK: insights from the RECCORD registry

BackgroundThe aim of the RECCORD registry was to gather real-world UK data on the use of targeted therapies in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and assess clinical outcomes. Here, demographic and outcome data are presented with the treatment patterns and demographic profile of patients on the registry.Patients and methodsPatients were retrospectively identified at seven UK hospitals with large cancer centres in England (5), Scotland (1) and Wales (1). Anonymised data were collected through an online registry covering demographics, treatments and outcomes. Five hundred and fourteen UK adult patients with metastatic RCC were included in the study for analysis. Patients were included if they were treated for metastatic RCC at one of the seven centres, and started systemic anti-cancer treatment from March 2009 to November 2012 inclusive. In addition to demographic factors, the principal outcome measures were overall survival (OS), time to disease progression and toxicity.ResultsThe majority of first-line treatment was with sunitinib; first-line use of pazopanib increased as the study progressed. 15.8% of patients received second-line treatment, half of whom were prescribed everolimus. Median OS (from initiation of first-line treatment) was 23.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 18.6–29.1 months), similar to that reported for clinical trials of targeted RCC therapies [Ljungberg B, Campbell SC, Choi HY et al. The epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2011; 60: 615–621; Abe H, Kamai T. Recent advances in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Int J Urol 2013; 20: 944–955; Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Tomczak P et al. Overall survival and updated results for sunitinib compared with interferon alfa in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 3584–3590]. OS was significantly longer for those who received second-line treatment after disease progression (33.0 months; 95% CI 30.8–35.2 months) than those who did not (20.9 months; 95% CI 16.4–25.3 months; P = 0.008).ConclusionsRECCORD is a large ‘real-world’ database assessing metastatic RCC treatment patterns and outcomes. Treatment patterns changed over time as targeted therapies were approved and became widely available; survival data in RECCORD are consistent with those reported for systemic treatments in clinical trials. Kaplan–Meier analysis of results demonstrated that receiving second-line therapy was a major prognostic factor for longer OS.     

The Effect of Targeted Therapy on Overall Survival in Advanced Renal Cancer: A Study of the National Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Registry Database

IntroductionWith the advent and availability of targeted therapy, the treatment of advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) underwent a drastic change in 2005. The effect of this change on clinical outcome within the population has not been studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the overall survival (OS), before, and after availability of targeted therapy, for advanced RCC cases in the population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry.Materials and MethodsAll advanced (regional and distant stage) RCC cases diagnosed within the 2000 to 2008 time periods were included. Because SEER does not report the exact therapy, and because targeted therapy was initially approved in 2005, we evaluated and compared the OS outcomes of advanced RCC cases diagnosed between the years 2000 and 2003 (before targeted therapy era) with that of those diagnosed between 2005 and 2008 (targeted therapy era).ResultsThere was a significant improvement in OS for advanced RCC patients treated in the targeted therapy era (n = 12,330) compared with those treated in the era before targeted therapy (n =11,565) (median OS 20 months vs. 15 months, P = .0006). Multivariate analysis revealed that in the time period before targeted therapy, age older than 65 years, black race, and lack of nephrectomy were predictors of a shorter OS.ConclusionIn univariate and multivariate analysis, targeted therapy demonstrated improvement in OS. Increasing access to targeted therapies is likely to improve outcomes in advanced RCC.     

Treatment outcome for metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND: Most clinical trial reports in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) do not distinguish between histologic subtypes, making it difficult to assess specific treatment efficacy. The current retrospective study sought to define clinical features and outcome data for metastatic papillary RCC. METHODS: Clinical features, treatment outcome, and survival were evaluated in 38 patients with metastatic papillary RCC who underwent clinical evaluation at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) between 1985 and 2005. Twenty-three of 513 individuals were identified from a clinical trial database, 14 of 1895 from a surgery database, and 1 of 357 from a pathology database. A literature review of systemic therapy in metastatic papillary RCC was performed. RESULTS: Among the 38 patients, 30 had been treated at MSKCC with various systemic therapies, including cytokines. Twelve therapies resulted in stable disease, 30 in initial progression of disease, and 1 in an unknown response. One patient had a partial response to sunitinib, a novel multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The median overall survival time for the entire study group was 8 months (95% confidence interval, 5-12). A literature review on treatment of metastatic papillary RCC produced 4 reports, confirming a lack of efficacy for systemic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: A resistance to systemic therapy characterizes patients with metastatic papillary RCC. Further understanding of the genetics and molecular biology and subtypes involved may provide the basis for more effective agents. Treatment with targeted therapies or other experimental agents is warranted.     

Impact of resection and systemic therapy on the survival of patients with brain metastasis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Patients with brain metastasis (BM) from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are associated with poor prognosis. Between 1990 and 2015, data of consecutive RCC patients with BM were retrospectively analyzed from a urologic oncologic database. The treatment outcome was evaluated by overall survival (OS), which was defined as interval from initial diagnosis of BM to death or last follow-up. Statistical analyses of clinical and pathological variables were performed using Cox regression and the Kaplan–Meier method. A total of 116 RCC patients with BM were included. Median time from initial diagnosis of RCC to BM was 15.8 months (95?% CI 11.6–20.0). Median OS after diagnosis of brain metastases of the whole cohort was 5.8 months (95?% CI 4.3–7.2). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, age and histology of non-clear cell RCC were associated with poorer outcome, while targeted therapy (n?=?26) (OS 9.9 months, 95?% CI 3.3–16.5) and BM resection (n?=?33) (OS 24.7 months, 95?% CI 4–40) were associated with better survival. Furthermore, patients who underwent both targeted therapy and BM resection (n?=?5) had the best outcome with median OS of 52.4 months. In conclusion, BM from RCC is associated with a poor oncological outcome. Furthermore, age and histology of non-clear cell RCC are risk factors for poor prognosis. Patients with resectable BM may comprise a better prognostic group. Here, a better OS for resected than unresected patients was observed, which warrants BM resection. A combined modality approach of resection and targeted therapy appears to further improve the outcome of these patients while additional radiation seems to add no benefit.     

4th International Symposium on Leukemia and Lymphoma – Molecular Pharmacology and New Treatment Modalitie

Renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) represent one of the ten leading cancer entities with an increasing incidence especially in the western world. Unfortunately, about 25% of the patients develop metastatic RCC (mRCC) associated with a most unfavorable prognosis. In the recent years, various new agents targeting VEGF or VEGF receptor (VEGFR) or the mTOR pathway have been approved for the treatment of mRCC with significant prolongation of progression-free survival and, in part, of overall survival (OS). Targeting the mTOR kinase is an interesting option for mRCC. Temsirolimus, one of the available mTOR inhibitors, has been approved as a single agent in poor-risk mRCC patients based on the pivotal Phase III trial showing a significant superiority in OS versus IFN-α or temsirolimus + IFN-α, which has been verified by a pivotal Phase III trial. The benefit has been shown for clear cell carcinoma and papillary RCC as well. For poor prognosis patients, temsirolimus improves median survival by 3.6 months. In second-line treatment compared with sorafenib following first-line treatment with sunitinib temsirolimus showed a relative progression-free survival benefit for patients with nonclear cell RCC with temsirolimus. The median OS for the temsirolimus group was 12.27 and 16.64 months for the sorafenib group. In 2007, the US FDA granted approval for temsirolimus for the treatment of advanced RCC.     

Motexafin gadolinium for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: phase II study results

BACKGROUND: Thioredoxin reductase (Trx) has been implicated in activation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha, which is overexpressed in > 85% of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). We evaluated the safety and efficacy of motexafin gadolinium (MGd), a Trx inhibitor, as a single-agent therapy for metastatic RCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic RCC were infused daily with MGd 5 mg/kg on days 1-5 and days 15-19 of each 28-day cycle. Patients were evaluated for response on days 21-28 of every third cycle. Those with tumor response or stable disease (SD) continued treatment for < or = 12 cycles. Twenty-five patients with confirmed metastatic RCC were enrolled. All were evaluable for toxicity, and 20 were evaluable for response. RESULTS: While no clinical responses were observed, 8 patients had SD after 3 treatment cycles, as did 4 after 6 cycles. Median overall survival was 10.1 months, and median progression- free survival was 2.7 months. The most common treatment-related toxicities were grade 1/2 pain, nausea, skin discoloration, fatigue, blisters, and headache. The most common grade 3 toxicity was hypophosphatemia, observed in 5 patients. MGd was reasonably tolerated, and disease stabilization was observed in several patients with metastatic RCC. CONCLUSION: These results show promise for the use of MGd in combination with other molecularly targeted therapies in previously treated patients with metastatic RCC. However, further investigation of MGd alone for metastatic RCC is not recommended.     

Prognostic Significance of Pancreatic Metastases in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Systemic Therapy

BackgroundPancreatic metastases (PM) are rare in renal cell carcinoma. It has been suggested that patients with metastases to the pancreas have a more favorable prognosis, but little is known about the long-term outcomes with systemic therapy. We sought to understand the outcomes of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma with PM treated with systemic therapy.Patients and MethodsWe conducted a pooled analysis of 4736 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated on phase II/III clinical trials. Systemic therapies included anti-vascular endothelial growth factor targeted therapy, mammalian target of rapamycin-targeted therapy, and cytokine therapy.ResultsThe primary end point was overall survival (OS) in patients with versus without PM. Statistical analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression. Among 4736 patients, 235 (5.0%) were identified to have baseline PM at therapy initiation. The median OS in patients with PM was significantly prolonged with OS of 41.7 months versus 19.0 months (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.52; P < .0001). Similarly, progression-free survival was significantly prolonged in patients with PM (10.9 vs. 6.9 months; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.72; P = .004). The effect of PM on OS and progression-free survival was independent of other sites of metastasis or International mRCC Database Consortium risk group.ConclusionThe presence of PM in RCC is an independent positive predictor for survival and improved response to systemic therapy. These findings suggest RCC with PM is associated with favorable outcomes and further work to understand the underlying disease biology of these patients is warranted.     

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results of a population-based study with 25 years follow-up

BackgroundRenal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the sixth leading cause of death in developed countries. A third of all RCC patients are confronted with metastatic disease. Since their approval in 2005 and 2006 in the USA, new targeted therapies may lead to substantial progress. Thus, the aim of this cohort study was to present clinical characteristics and survival in metastatic RCC in a population-based sample before widespread implementation of these new therapies.MethodsPatients (2264) with metastatic RCC registered between 1978 and 2005 in the cancer registry of Munich, Bavaria were analysed.ResultsMedian survival and 5 year relative survival from the 1st metastases were 14.4 months and 21%, respectively. Median survival has slightly improved from 13.2 months in 1978–1987 to 15.6 months since 2002.ConclusionSurvival of patients with metastatic RCC did not substantially improve within the last three decades. Assuming that new targeted therapies are successful in the treatment of metastatic RCC, population-based data like these can provide a basis for assessing the progress shown in clinical studies and for surveying critically the future implementation of new therapies in routine care.     

Utilization of cytoreductive nephrectomy and patient survival in the targeted therapy era

We sought to analyze utilization and survival outcomes of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) before and after introduction of targeted therapy. We identified patients with metastatic RCC between 1993 and 2010 in the SEER registry and examined temporal trends in utilization. We performed a joinpoint regression to determine when changes in utilization of CN occurred. We fitted multivariable proportional hazard models in full and propensity score‐matched cohorts. We performed a difference‐in‐difference analysis to compare survival outcomes before and after introduction of targeted therapy. The proportion of patients undergoing CN increased from 1993 to 2004, from 29% to 39%. We identified a primary joinpoint of 2004, just prior to the introduction of targeted therapy. Beginning in 2005, there was a modest decrease in utilization of CN. CN was associated with a lower adjusted relative hazard (0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.34–0.43). Median survival among patients receiving CN increased in the targeted therapy era (19 vs. 13 months), while median survival among patients not receiving CN increased only slightly (4 vs. 3 months). Difference‐in‐difference analysis showed a significant decrease in hazard of death among patients who received CN in the targeted therapy era. Despite decreased utilization in the targeted therapy era, CN remains associated with improved survival. Prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm the benefit of CN among patients with metastatic RCC treated with novel targeted therapies.     

Implications of therapy choice on overall survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE: To compare the effect of high-dose interleukin-2 (HD IL-2) vs other cytokine therapies on 1-, 2, and 5-yr overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with untreated metastatic RCC treated by a single investigator. The different treatment groups included HD IL-2, low-dose IL-2 alone or in combination, interferon alpha alone and other therapies. The primary end point was survival from time of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 85 patients were studies with a median follow up of 13 mo (0.6-112.9). Median age at treatment was 59 yr with predominantly male patients and histology of clear cell type. Thirty-four percent received HD IL-2 and treatment was initiated less than 6 mo from the time of diagnosis in 66%. For all patients, median survival was 16 mo with a 5-yr survival of 12%. Two factors were good predictors of overall survival: Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of 100 (p < 0.0001) and soft tissue metastasis (p = 0.01). When comparing HD IL-2 to all other groups, median survival was 18 vs 14 mo and 1-yr survival was 74% vs 51%, respectively. CONCLUSION: HD IL-2 is associated with clinically meaningful improvement in median and 1-yr survival.     

Overall survival of first‐line axitinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Japanese subgroup analysis from phase II study

Subgroup analyses of a randomized global phase II study of axitinib showed objective response rate of 66% and median progression‐free survival of 27.6 months in treatment‐naïve Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This analysis evaluated overall survival (OS) and safety in 44 Japanese patients and compared the results with 169 non‐Japanese patients. In addition, baseline characteristics for predictive factors that may influence OS in first‐line metastatic RCC were explored in all patients using a Cox proportional hazard model. With median follow‐up of 33 months, fewer than half (16 of 44) of the Japanese patients had died and median OS was not reached (95% confidence interval [CI], 38.8 months–not estimable), whereas 107 of 169 (63%) non‐Japanese patients had died and median OS was 33.9 months (95% CI, 28.9–42.7). Estimated 1‐year, 2‐year and 3‐year survival probability (95% CI) was 86.4% (76.2–96.5), 75.0% (62.2–87.8) and 68.2% (54.4–81.9), respectively, in Japanese patients, and was higher than that in non‐Japanese patients (75.1% [68.4–81.8], 62.1% [54.5–69.7] and 47.2% [39.3–55.1], respectively). The updated safety analysis did not reveal any new adverse events of concern among Japanese or non‐Japanese patients. The multivariate analysis identified that lower baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, lower baseline tumor burden, and longer time from histopathological diagnosis to treatment were significant positive predictors of OS. The current analysis confirmed the clinical activity of axitinib in treatment‐naïve Japanese patients with metastatic RCC, with an acceptable toxicity profile.     

分子靶向药物给药模式对转移性结直肠癌患者生存的影响

目的 探讨两种不同类型靶向药物在不同给药模式下对转移性结直肠癌（mCRC）患者生存的影响。方法 回顾性分析135例接受过分子靶向治疗mCRC患者的临床病理特征、靶向治疗情况及随访资料,比较不同种类靶向药物及不同线数化疗联合靶向治疗对生存期（OS）的影响。结果 全组中接受抗EGFR单抗者、接受贝伐珠单抗者及接受抗EGFR单抗+贝伐珠单抗者的中位OS依次为20.7、24.4和41.6个月,接受两种靶向药物者比仅接受一种靶向药物者的中位OS有明显延长（P＜0.05）;一线化疗未联合靶向治疗者的中位OS为30.8个月,与一线化疗联合靶向治疗者的21.5个月相比,差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）;三线及以上联合靶向治疗者的中位OS为37.0个月,高于三线前均联合靶向治疗者的137个月,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）;接受过三种化疗药物（伊立替康、奥沙利铂、氟尿嘧啶）及贝伐珠单抗和抗EGFR单抗两种靶向药物的患者中,三线及以上使用靶向者的中位OS为50.6个月,与三线前使用靶向者的41.6个月比较,差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 接受过两类靶向药物治疗的mCRC患者比仅接受一类靶向药物者可能获得更好生存获益。患者使用靶向药物的时机并非越早越好,肿瘤生物学行为较好的患者更适合先化疗后靶向的治疗模式。     

Real World Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Melanoma Treated in Alberta,Canada: A Time-Era Based Analysis

Immune checkpoint and MAP kinase pathway inhibitors can significantly improve long-term survival for patients with melanoma. There is limited real-world data of these regimens’ effectiveness. We retrospectively analyzed 402 patients with unresectable and metastatic melanoma between August 2013 and July 2020 treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and MAP kinase pathway targeted therapy in Alberta, Canada. Overall survival (OS) was compared using Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses. Subgroup survival outcomes were analyzed by first-line treatment regime and BRAF mutation status. Three treatment eras were defined based on drug access: prior to August 2013, August 2013 to November 2016, and November 2016 to July 2020. Across each era, there were improvements in median OS: 11.7 months, 15.9 months, and 33.6 months, respectively. Patients with BRAF mutant melanoma had improved median OS when they were treated with immunotherapy in the first line as opposed to targeted therapy (median OS not reached for immunotherapy versus 17.4 months with targeted treatment). Patients with BRAF wild-type melanomas had improved survival with ipilimumab and nivolumab versus those treated with a single-agent PD-1 inhibitor (median OS not reached and 21.2 months). Our real-world analysis confirms significant survival improvements with each subsequent introduction of novel therapies for advanced melanoma.     

The association between antibiotic use and survival in renal cell carcinoma patients treated with immunotherapy: a multi-center study

BackgroundImmunotherapy improves overall survival (OS) in the second and later lines of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treatment. Recent studies have suggested that antibiotic (ATB) use either shortly before or after the start of immunotherapy could lead to decreased OS. Herein, we evaluate the impact of ATB use on OS in RCC patients treated with nivolumab in a multi-center cohort from Turkey.MethodsThe data of 93 metastatic RCC patients treated with nivolumab in the second line or later were retrospectively collected from 6 oncology centers. Previous treatments, sites of metastases, International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk classification, and ATB use in the three months before (-3) or three months after (+3) the start of immunotherapy were recorded together with survival data. The association of clinical factors with OS and progression-free survival (PFS) was analyzed with univariate and multivariable analyses.ResultsThe median age was 61 (interquartile range 54-67), and 76.3% of the patients were male. The median OS of the cohort was 23.75 ± 4.41, and the PFS was 8.44 ± 1.61 months. Thirty-one (33.3%) patients used ATBs in the 3 months before (-3) or 3 months after (+3) nivolumab initiation. In the multivariable analyses, ATB exposure (HR: 2.306, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.155-4.601, P = 0.018) and the presence of brain metastases at the baseline (HR: 2.608, 95% CI: 1.200-5.666, P = 0.015) had a statistically significant association with OS, while ATB exposure was the only statistically significant parameter associated with PFS (HR: 2.238, 95% CI: 1.284-3.900, P = 0.004).ConclusionIn our study, patients with ATB exposure in the 3 months before or 3 months after the start of immunotherapy had shorter OS. Our findings further support meticulous risk–benefit assessments of prescribing ATBs for patients who are either receiving or are expected to receive immunotherapy.     

ERCC1 Expression in Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Platinum-Based Chemotherapy

Background: Possible targeted therapies for metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) include cytotoxic chemotherapy that causes interstrand breaks (platinum-based drugs). The excision repair cross-complementation 1 (ERCC1) enzyme plays an essential role in the nucleotide excision repair pathway, removing platinum-induced DNA adducts and contributing to cisplatin resistance. Detecting ERCC1 overexpression is important in considering treatment options for metastatic TNBC, including individualized approaches to therapy, and may facilitate improved responses or reduction of unnecessary toxicity. We hypothesized that assigning cisplatin based on pretreatment ERCC1 expression would improve response and survival. This study was conducted to assess the impact of ERCC1 expression on PFS, OS and response rates in metastatic triple negative breast cancer patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Methods: From June 2012 to November 2013, 52 metastatic triple negative breast cancer patients were enrolled. ERCC1 protein expression was detected from pretreatment biopsies by Immunohistochemistry. All patients received cisplatin plus paclitaxel. The primary end point was the impact of ERCC1 expression on PFS and OS. Results: 34 patients (65.4%) showed positive ERCC1 expression while 18 (34.6%) proved negative. Positive ERCC1 expression was associated with short PFS (median, 5 months vs. 7 months; P = 0.043), short OS (median, 9 months vs. 11 months; P = 0.033) and poor response to cisplatin based chemotherapy (P = 0.046). Conclusions: This prospective study further validated ERCC1 as a reliable biomarker for customized chemotherapy in metastatic triple negative breast cancer patients. High expression of ERCC1 was thereby fond to be significantly associated with poor outcome in patients treated with platinum based chemotherapy.     

Clinicopathological and prognostic factors for long-term survival in Chinese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sorafenib: a single-center retrospective study

Data on long-term survival and prognostic significance of demographic factors and adverse events (AEs) associated with sorafenib, an orally administered multikinase inhibitor in Chinese population with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are limited. Outcome data from adult patients (n = 256) with advanced RCC who received sorafenib (400 mg twice daily) either as first-line or second-line therapy between April 2006 and May 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. The primary endpoint was median overall survival (OS), determined to be 22.2 (95% CI: 17.1–27.4) months, and the secondary endpoint was overall median progression-free survival (PFS), determined to be 13.6 (95% CI: 10.7–16.4) months at a median follow-up time of 61.8 (95% CI: 16.2–97.4) months. Analysis of the incidence of AEs revealed the most common side effect as hand-foot skin reactions (60.5%) followed by diarrhea (38.7%), fatigue (35.5%), alopecia (34.0%), rash (24.6%), hypertension (21.5%) and gingival hemorrhage (21.1%). Multivariate regression analysis revealed older age (≥ 58 years), lower Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center score, time from nephrectomy to sorafenib treatment, number of metastatic tumors and best response as significant and independent demographic predictors for improved PFS and/or OS (p ≤ 0.05). Alopecia was identified as a significant and independent predictor of increased OS, whereas vomiting and weight loss were identified as significant predictors of decreased OS (p ≤ 0.05). Sorafenib significantly improved OS and PFS in Chinese patients with advanced RCC. Considering the identified significant prognostic demographic factors along with the advocated prognostic manageable AEs while identifying treatment strategy may help clinicians select the best treatment modality and better predict survival in these patients.     

Effectiveness,safety and quality of life of trifluridine/tipiracil in pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Real-world data from the noninterventional TACTIC study in Germany

The prospective, multicenter, noninterventional TACTIC study assessed effectiveness and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a real-world setting in Germany, thus evaluating the external validity of the findings from the pivotal RECOURSE trial. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), safety, and quality of life (QoL). Subgroups comprised patients with good (<3 metastatic sites at inclusion, ≥18 months from diagnosis of first metastasis to inclusion) or poor (remaining patients) prognostic characteristics (GPC/PPC). GPC without liver metastases was considered best prognostic characteristics (BPC). In total, 307 eligible patients (pretreated or not suitable for other available therapies) were treated with FTD/TPI. Overall, median [95%-CI] OS was 7.4 months [6.4-8.6], median PFS was 2.9 months [2.8-3.3]. In BPC (n = 65) and GPC (n = 176) compared to PPC (n = 124) subgroup, median OS (13.3 [9.1-17.6] vs 8.9 [7.6-9.8] vs 5.1 [4.4-7.0] months) and median PFS (4.0 [3.3-5.3] vs 3.4 [3.0-3.7] vs 2.6 [2.4-2.8] months) were longer. Patient-reported QoL, assessed by validated questionnaires (EQ-5D-5L, PRO-CTCAE), was stable throughout FTD/TPI treatment. Predominant FTD/TPI-related adverse events of grades 3 or 4 were neutropenia (13.0%), leukopenia (7.5%), and anemia (5.2%). Altogether, palliative FTD/TPI therapy in patients with pretreated mCRC was associated with prolonged survival, delayed progression, maintained health-related QoL, and manageable toxicity. Low metastatic burden and indolent disease were favorable prognostic factors for survival. TACTIC confirms the effectiveness and safety of FTD/TPI, highlighting its value in routine clinical practice.     

Clinical Outcome of Turkish Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients with Currently Available Treatment Modalities - Single Center Experience

Background: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer-relateddeath among women in the developed countries. Despite advances in screening, improved local therapies andadjuvant systemic treatments, median survival of metastatic breast cancer patients (MBC) is in the range of 2-3years at most. We aimed to investigate whether the prognostic factors and therapeutic responses of our Turkishpatients are similar to those in the literature. Materials and Methods: We reviewed the medical records of MBCpatients who had been treated in our institution between 1999-2009 and analyzed their clinicopathological featuresand survival outcomes retrospectively Results: A hundred and sixty patients were included. Median age was47 (23-82), median follow up was 24 (2-186) months. At the time of diagnosis 59% of patients were under theage of 50 and 46% were postmenopausal. The majority (37%) had multiple sites of metastases. Forty percentreceived endocrine therapy and 40% chemotherapy as first line metastatic treatment. Thirty (20%) patientswere treated with molecular targeting agents like trastuzumab, lapatinib and sunitinib, frequently combinedwith a chemotherapy agent. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 32% and median OS was 38 months for thewhole group. Five year progression free survival (PFS) was 10% and median PFS was 10 months. Menopausalstatus, hormone receptor expression and disease free status had a significant impact on overall survival in themultivariate analysis (p 0.018, p 0.018 and p:0.003, respectively). Conclusions: All our patients were treated withthe modern oncologic therapies recommended by the international guidelines. From our data, MBC patientslive up to 3-4 years, indicating that further improvement beyond that requires development of new treatmentmodalities. The survival outcomes of our patients were consistent with the data reported in the literature.