Electrophysiological Characteristics of Localized Reentrant Atrial Tachycardia Occurring After Catheter Ablation of Long-Lasting Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Background: Mapping of recurrent atrial tachycardia (AT) after extensive ablation for long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is complex. We sought to describe the electrophysiological characteristics of localized reentry occurring after ablation of long-lasting persistent AF.
Methods: Out of 70 patients undergoing catheter ablation of long-lasting persistent AF, 9 patients (13%, 55 ± 8 years, 8 males) in whom localized reentry was demonstrated in a repeat ablation were studied. Localized reentry was defined as reentry in which the circuit was localized to a small area and did not have a central obstacle. The mechanism of AT was determined by electroanatomical and entrainment mapping.
Results: Nine localized reentries with cycle length of 243 ± 41 ms were mapped in 9 patients. The location of AT was the left atrial appendage in 4 patients, anterior left atrium in 2, left septum in 2, and mitral isthmus in 1. In all ATs, a critical isthmus of <10 mm in width was identified in the vicinity of the prior linear lesions or ostia of isolated pulmonary veins. Ablation of the critical isthmus, which was characterized by continuous low-voltage activity (median voltage: 0.15 mV, mean duration: 117 ± 31 ms), terminated AT and rendered it noninducible. Additionally, ablation was performed for all of inducible ATs. At 11 ± 7 months after the procedure, 8 of 9 patients (89%) were free from any arrhythmias.
Conclusions: After ablation of long-lasting persistent AF, localized reentry may arise from a site in the vicinity of the prior ablation lesions. Ablation of the critical isthmus eliminates the arrhythmia.     

Distinct Electrocardiographic Form of Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmia Originating From the Left Bundle Branch

Most premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) arise from the right or left ventricular outflow tract. Some VPCs originate near the His‐bundle region. However, there remains a paucity of information on PVCs originating directly from the cardiac conduction system. We describe 2 cases with idiopathic frequent PVCs that were mapped directly to the left bundle branch itself. We also provide an anatomic‐based mapping and ablation approach for management of these uncommon and challenging arrhythmias. In both cases we were able to either eliminate or significantly suppress the ectopic source by applying radiofrequency at this location without causing any significant impairment of the atrioventricular conduction.     

Macroreentrant Atrial Tachycardia in Patients without Previous Atrial Surgery or Catheter Ablation: Clinical and Electrophysiological Characteristics of Scar‐Related Left Atrial Anterior Wall Reentry

Scar‐Related Left Atrial Anterior Wall Reentry. Introduction: Macroreentrant atrial tachycardia (MRAT) has been described most frequently in patients with prior cardiac surgery. Left atrial tachycardia and flutter are common in patients who undergo atrial fibrillation ablation; however, few reports describe left atrial MRAT involving the regions of spontaneous scarring. Here, we describe left atrial MRAT in patients without prior cardiac surgery or catheter ablation (CA) and discuss the clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of tachycardia and outcome of CA. Methods and Results: An electrophysiological study and CA were performed in 6 patients (3 men; age 76 ± 6 years) with MRAT originating from the left atrial anterior wall (LAAW). No patient had a history of cardiac surgery or CA in the left atrium. Spontaneous scars (areas with bipolar voltage ≤ 0.05 mV) were observed in all patients. The activation map showed a figure‐eight circuit with loops around the mitral annulus (4 counterclockwise and 2 clockwise) and a low‐voltage area with LAAW scarring. The mean tachycardia cycle length was 303 ± 49 milliseconds. The conduction velocity was significantly slower in the isthmus between the scar in the LAAW and the mitral annulus than in the lateral mitral annulus (0.17 ± 0.05 m/s vs 0.94 ± 0.35 m/s; P = 0.003). Successful ablation of the isthmus caused interruption of the tachycardia and rendered it noninducible in all patients. Conclusion: Spontaneous LAAW scarring is an unusual cause of MRAT, showing activation patterns with a figure‐eight configuration. Radiofrequency CA is a feasible and effective treatment in such cases. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 24, pp. 404‐412, April 2013)     

Clinical Significance of Early Recurrences of Atrial Tachycardia After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Early Recurrence After AF Ablation. Background: Atrial tachycardia (AT) commonly recurs within 3 months after radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it remains unclear whether early recurrence of atrial tachycardia (ERAT) predicts late recurrence of AF or AT. Methods: Of 352 consecutive patients who underwent circumferential pulmonary vein isolation with or without linear ablation(s) for AF, 56 patients (15.9%) with ERAT were identified by retrospective analysis. ERAT was defined as early relapse of AT within a 3‐month blanking period after ablation. Results: During 21.7 ± 12.5 months, the rate of late recurrence was higher in patients with ERAT (41.1%) compared with those without ERAT (11.8%, P < 0.001). In a multivariable model, positive inducibility of AF or AT immediately after ablation (65.2% vs 36.4%, P = 0.046; odd ratio, 3.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.0–14.6) and the number of patients who underwent cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation (73.9% vs 42.4%, P = 0.042; odd ratio, 4.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.1–19.5) were significantly related to late recurrence in the ERAT group. The duration of ablation (174.3 ± 62.3 vs 114.7 ± 39.5 minutes, P = 0.046) and the procedure time (329.3 ± 83.4 vs 279.2 ± 79.7 minutes, P = 0.027) were significantly longer in patients with late recurrence than in those without late recurrence following ERAT. Conclusions: The late recurrence rate is higher in the patients with ERAT compared with those without ERAT following AF ablation, and is more often noted in the patients who underwent CTI ablation and had a prolonged procedure time. Furthermore, inducibility of AF or AT immediately after ablation independently predicts late recurrence in patients with ERAT. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 1331‐1337, December 2010)     

Induced Atrial Tachycardia After Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Electrophysiological Characteristics and Impact of Catheter Ablation on the Follow-Up Results

Introduction: Atrial tachycardia (AT), including focal and reentrant AT, can occur after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI). The aim of this study was to investigate the electrophysiological characteristics of induced AT and its clinical outcome.
Methods and Results: In our series of 160 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), 45 ATs were induced by high-current burst pacing after CPVI in 26 patients. All induced ATs were mapped using a three-dimensional ( 3D) mapping system. Noninducibility was the endpoint of the ablation of the AT. Gap-related AT was considered if the AT was related to the CPVI lesions. A 16-slice multidetector computed tomography scan was performed in all patients to correlate the anatomical structure with electroanatomical mapping. Thirty-five (78%) reentrant ATs and 10 (22%) focal ATs were identified. Of those, 34 were gap-related ATs (24 reentrant and 10 focal ATs). Reentrant AT had more gaps in the left atrial appendage ridge than did focal AT (39.6% vs 0%, P = 0.02). Focal AT had a higher incidence of gap in the PV carina compared with reentrant AT (80% vs 10%, P < 0.001). Reentrant ATs were mostly terminated during the ablation creating the mitral and roof lines with crossing of the gaps. During a mean follow-up of 21 ± 8 months, only one patient (0.6%) with induced mitral reentry had a recurrent AT.
Conclusion: The location of the AT gap may be related with the complex anatomy of the LA. The induced ATs after CPVI can be eliminated by catheter ablation.     

Outcome of Ablation for Sustained Focal Atrial Tachycardia in Patients With and Without a History of Atrial Fibrillation

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the long-term results of ablation for sustained focal atrial tachycardia in patients with and without a history of atrial fibrillation.Methods: A history of atrial fibrillation was documented in 25 of 111 patients (23%) with focal atrial tachycardias. We studied the results of focal ablation during a follow-up of 27 ± 22 months.Results: Enlargement of left atrium (Odds ratio 2.99) and septal origin of the atrial focus (Odds ratio 5.68) were independent predictors of coexisting atrial fibrillation. Patients with a septal origin of the focal atrial tachycardia were older (62 vs. 54 years) and had a higher rate of structural heart disease than patients with a non-septal site of origin (51 vs. 29%). A higher rate of atrial fibrillation was found in patients with anteroseptal (56%), midseptal (50%) and posteroseptal (36%) atrial tachycardias than in patients with focal atrial tachycardias arising from the crista terminalis (9%), the tricuspid (12%) and mitral annulus (0%), the ostia of thoracic veins (17%) and other right atrial (27%) and left atrial free wall sites (10%). During the follow-up, atrial fibrillation was documented in 3% of patients without preexisting atrial fibrillation. In patients with focal atrial tachycardia and a history of atrial fibrillation, at least one episode of atrial fibrillation was documented during follow-up in 64% of patients, but 60% of patients reported marked symptomatic improvement.Conclusion: An increased rate of coexisting atrial fibrillation was found in patients with a septal origin of focal atrial tachycardia. Ablation of the focal atrial tachycardia may eliminate both arrhythmias, but patients with a history of atrial fibrillation may still be prone to recurrences of atrial fibrillation after focal ablation.     

Speech‐Induced Atrial Tachycardia: An Unusual Presentation of Supraventricular Tachycardia

A 63‐year‐old male radio announcer was admitted with a narrow complex, long RP tachycardia. While in the awake state, the patient spoke in his radio voice, initiating and maintaining the tachycardia. Three‐dimensional electroanatomic mapping during electrophysiology study localized the tachycardia to the ostium of the right superior pulmonary vein. After single radiofrequency energy application, no further arrhythmias were inducible with speech. At more than 1 year of follow‐up, the patient had no recurrences and continues to work as a radio announcer.     

Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Clinical and Electrophysiological Features and Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Following Elimination of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Introduction: Clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) have not been studied in a large patient cohort. We aimed to define the clinical features and cardiac electrophysiological characteristics of these patients, and to examine the incidence and identify predictors of AF recurrences after elimination of AVNRT. Methods and Results: Thirty-six patients with AVNRT and documented paroxysmal AF (Group 1) and 497 patients with AVNRT alone undergoing ablation in the same period (Group 2) were studied. There were no significant differences between groups regarding clinical features, except age, which was higher in Group 1 (p < 0.001). Presence of atrial vulnerability (induction of AF lasting > 30 seconds) and multiple AH jumps (≥50 ms) before ablation were significantly more prevalent in Group 1 (p < 0.001, p = 0.010 respectively). During follow-up of 34 ± 11 months, AF recurred in 10 patients (28%) in Group 1, while 2 patients in Group 2 (0.4%) developed paroxysmal AF (p < 0.001). Univariate predictors of AF were: left atrial diameter > 40 mm (p = 0.001), presence of mitral or aortic calcification (p = 0.003), atrial vulnerability after ablation (p = 0.015) and valvular disease (p = 0.042). However, independent predictors of AF recurrences were left atrial diameter > 40 mm (p = 0.002) and the presence of atrial vulnerability after ablation (p = 0.034). Conclusion: In patients with both AVNRT and paroxysmal AF, the recurrence rate of AF after elimination of AVNRT is 28%. Left atrial diameter greater than 40 mm and atrial vulnerability after elimination of AVNRT are independent predictors of AF recurrences in the long term.     

Long‐Term Outcome Following Successful Catheter Ablation of Atrial Tachycardia Originating From the Pulmonary Veins: Absence of Late Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial Fibrillation and Pulmonary Vein Tachycardia . Objectives: This study aimed to characterize the long‐term outcome and incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients following catheter ablation of focal atrial tachycardia (AT) from the pulmonary veins (PV). Background: Although both AT and AF may originate from ectopic foci within PVs, it is unknown whether PV AT patients subsequently develop AF. Methods: Twenty‐eight patients with 29 PV ATs (14%) from a consecutive series of 194 patients who underwent RFA for focal AT were included. Patients with concomitant AF prior to the index procedure were excluded. Results: The minimum follow‐up duration was 4 years; mean age 38 ± 18 years with symptoms for 6.5 ± 10 years, having tried 1.5 ± 0.9 antiarrhythmic drugs. The distribution of foci was: left superior 12 (41%), right superior 10 (34%), left inferior 5 (17%), and right inferior 2 (7%). The focus was ostial in 93% and 2–4 cm distally within the vein in 7%. Mean tachycardia cycle length was 364 ± 90 ms. Focal ablation was performed in 25 of 28 patients. There were 6 recurrences with 5 from the original site. Twenty‐six patients were available for long‐term clinical follow‐up. At a mean of 7.2 ± 2.1 years, 25 of 26 (96%) were free from recurrence off antiarrhythmic drugs. No patients developed AF. Conclusions: Focal ablation for tachycardia originating from the PVs is associated with long‐term freedom from both AT and AF. Therefore, although PV AT and PV AF share a common anatomic distribution, PV AT is a distinct clinical entity successfully treated with focal RFA and not associated with AF in the long term. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. pp. 747‐750, July 2010)     

Electrocardiographic Diagnosis of Atrial Tachycardia: Classification,P‐Wave Morphology,and Differential Diagnosis with Other Supraventricular Tachycardias

Atrial tachycardia is defined as a regular atrial activation from atrial areas with centrifugal spread, caused by enhanced automaticity, triggered activity or microreentry. New ECG classification differentiates between focal and macroreentrant atrial tachycardia. Macroreentrant atrial tachycardias include typical atrial flutter and other well characterized macroreentrant circuits in right and left atrium. Typical atrial flutter has been described as counterclockwise reentry within right atrial and it presents a characteristic ECG “sawtooth” pattern on the inferior leads. The foci responsible for focal atrial tachycardia do not occur randomly throughout the atria but tend to cluster at characteristic anatomical locations. The surface ECG is a very helpful tool in directing mapping to particular areas of interest. Atrial tachycardia should be differentiated from other supraventricular tachycardias. We propose a diagnostic algorithm in order to help the physician to discriminate among those. Holter analysis could offer further details to differentiate between atrial tachycardia and another supraventricular tachycardia. However, if the diagnosis is uncertain, it is possible to utilize vagal maneuvers or adenosine administration. In conclusion, in spite of well–known limits, a good interpretation of ECG is very important and it could help the physician to manage and to treat correctly patients with atrial tachycardia.     

The Response of Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia to Overdrive Atrial and Ventricular Pacing:

Pacing During Supraventricular Tachycardia. Introduction: Standard electrophysiologic techniques generally allow discrimination among mechanisms of paroxysmal Supraventricular tachycardia. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the response of paroxysmal Supraventricular tachycardia to atrial and ventricular overdrive pacing can help determine the tachycardia mechanism. Methods and Results: Fifty-three patients with paroxysmal Supraventricular tachycardia were studied. Twenty-two patients had the typical form of atrioventricular (AV) junctional (nodal) reentry, 18 patients had orthodromic AV reentrant tachycardia, 10 patients had atrial tachycardia, and 3 patients had the atypical form of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. After paroxysmal Supraventricular tachycardia was induced, 15-beat trains were introduced in the high right atrium and right ventricular apex sequentially with cycle lengths beginning 10 msec shorter than the spontaneous tachycardia cycle length. The pacing cycle length was shortened in successive trains until a cycle of 200 msec was reached or until tachycardia was terminated. Several responses of paroxysmal Supraventricular tachycardia to overdrive pacing were useful in distinguishing atrial tachycardia from other mechanisms of paroxysmal Supraventricular tachycardia. During decremental atrial overdrive pacing, the curve relating the pacing cycle length to the VA interval on the first beat following the cessation of atrial pacing was flat or upsloping in patients with AV junctional reentry or AV reentrant tachycardia, but variable in patients with atrial tachycardia. AV reentry and AV junctional reentry could always be terminated by overdrive ventricular pacing whereas atrial tachycardia was terminated in only one of ten patients (P < 0.001). The curve relting the ventricular pacing cycle length to the VA interval on the first postpacing beat was flat or upsloping in patients with AV junctional reentry and AV reentry, but variable in patients with atrial tachycardia. The typical form of AV junctional reentry could occasionally be distinguished from other forms of paroxysmal Supraventricular tachycardia by the shortening of the AH interval following tachycardia termination during constant rate atrial pacing. Conclusions: Atrial and ventricular overdrive pacing can rapidly and reliably distinguish atrial tachycardia from other mechanisms of paroxysmal Supraventricular tachycardia and occasionally assist in the diagnosis of other tachycardia mechanisms. In particular, the ability to exclude atrial tachycardia as a potential mechanism for paroxysmal Supraventricular tachycardia has important implications for the use of catheter ablation techniques to cure paroxysmal Supraventricular tachycardia.