A comparison of blind and lightwand-guided tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask

We have tested the hypothesis that intubation success rates, haemodynamic changes, airway complications and postoperative pharyngolaryngeal morbidity differ between blind and lightwand-guided intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask airway. One hundred and twenty paralysed anasthetised adult patients (ASA I-II, no known or predicted difficult airways) were assigned in a random manner to one of two equal-sized groups. In the blind group, patients were intubated blindly through the intubating laryngeal mask airway. In the lightwand group, patients were intubated through the intubating laryngeal mask airway assisted by transillumination of the neck with a lightwand. A standard sequence of adjusting manoeuvres was followed if resistance occurred during intubation or if transillumination was incorrect. The number of adjusting manoeuvres, time to intubation, intubation success rates, haemodynamic changes (pre-induction, pre-intubation, postintubation), oesophageal intubation, mucosal trauma (blood detected), hypoxia (oxygen saturation < 95%) and postoperative pharyngolaryngeal morbidity (double-blinded) were documented. Overall intubation success was similar (blind, 93%; lightwand, 100%), but time to successful intubation was significantly shorter (67 vs. 46 s, p = 0. 027) and the number of adjusting manoeuvres was significantly fewer (p = 0.024) in the lightwand group. There were no significant differences in blood pressure or heart rate between the groups at any time. Oesophageal intubation occurred more frequently in the blind group (18 vs. 0%, p = 0.002). The incidence and severity of mucosal injury, sore throat and hoarseness were similar between the groups. We conclude that lightwand-guided intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask is superior to the blind technique.     

Awake tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask

PURPOSE: To report successful awake insertion of the intubating laryngeal mask (Fastrach) and subsequent tracheal intubation through it, in a patient with predicted difficult tracheal intubation, due to limited mouth opening, and difficult ventilation through a facemask, due to a large mass at the corner of the mouth. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 53-yr-old woman with a large post-gangrenous mass on the right cheek to the angle of the mouth was scheduled for its resection. The right side of her face was damaged by a bomb attack followed by cancrum oris 50 yr ago. The distance between the incisors during maximum mouth opening was 2 cm and that between the gums on the right side < 1 cm. After preoxygenation and 50 micrograms fentanyl and 30 mg propofol i.v., propofol was infused at 2 mg.kg-1.hr-1. Lidocaine, 8%, was sprayed on the oropharynx. A #4 intubating laryngeal mask was inserted with a little difficulty. A fibrescope was passed through a 7.5-mm ID RAE tracheal tube, and the combination was easily passed through the laryngeal mask into the trachea. General ansthesia was then induced. Finally, the intubating laryngeal mask was removed, while the RAE tube was being stabilized using an uncuffed 6.0-mm ID tracheal tube. CONCLUSION: Awake tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask is a useful technique in patients with limited mouth opening in whom ventilation via a facemask is expected to be difficult.     

The intubating laryngeal mask airway in failed fibreoptic intubation

PURPOSE: Prediction of difficult tracheal intubation is not always reliable and management with fibreoptic intubation is not always successful. We describe two cases in which blind intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA FasTrach) succeeded after fibreoptic intubation failed. CLINICAL FEATURES: The first patient, a 50 yr old man, was scheduled for elective craniotomy for intracerebral tumour. Difficulty with intubation was not anticipated. Manual ventilation was easily performed following induction of general anesthesia, but direct laryngoscopy revealed only the tip of the epiglottis. Intubation attempts with a styletted 8.0 mm endotracheal tube and with the fibreoptic bronchoscope were unsuccessful. A #5 FasTrach was inserted through which a flexible armored cuffed 8.0 mm silicone tube passed into the trachea at the first attempt. The second patient, a 43 yr old man, presented with limited mouth opening, swelling of the right submandibular gland that extended into the retropharynx and tracheal deviation to the left. He was scheduled for urgent tracheostomy. Attempted awake fibreoptic orotracheal intubation under topical anesthesia showed gross swelling of the pharyngeal tissues and only fleeting views of the vocal cords. A #4 FasTrach was easily inserted, a clear airway obtained and a cuffed 8.0 mm silicone tube passed into the trachea at the first attempt. CONCLUSION: The FasTrach may facilitate blind tracheal intubation when fibreoptic intubation is unsuccessful.     

Malposition of the epiglottis after tracheal intubation via the intubating laryngeal mask

The intubating laryngeal mask has been reported to be a successful method of tracheal intubation although advancement of the tracheal tube via the laryngeal inlet into the trachea cannot be seen. Damage to the larynx or other tissues may occur during blind passage of a tracheal tube. We report a case in which the tracheal tube, advanced blindly, tucked the epiglottis into the laryngeal inlet, resulting in oedema of the epiglottis. This case illustrates the potential for airway obstruction after extubation when using the intubating laryngeal mask as a blind intubation guide.      

Feasibility of flexible lightwand-guided tracheal intubation with the intubating laryngeal mask during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation by an emergency physician

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We tested the feasibility of using the intubating laryngeal mask airway Fastrach (ILMA) as a ventilatory device and for flexible lightwand-guided tracheal intubation for out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation by an emergency physician. METHODS: After completion of a training programme, a single experienced emergency physician used the technique for all patients requiring out-of-hospital tracheal intubation over a 10-month period. If access to the head and neck was limited, the intubating laryngeal mask airway was inserted from below and to the side, otherwise it was inserted from above the head. Data about the time for the ambulance to reach the patient, whether or not access to the head and neck was limited, whether or not circulation was successfully restored, and the insertion and intubation success rates were noted. RESULTS: The mean (range) time for the ambulance to reach the patient was 12 (10-20) min. Access to the head and neck was limited in 8/37 (22%). Circulation was successfully restored in 10/37 (27%). The intubating laryngeal mask airway was successfully inserted at the first attempt in 35/37 (95%) and at the second attempt in 2/37 (5%). The tracheal tube was successfully inserted in 25/37 (67.5%) at the first attempt, 7/37 (19%) at the second attempt and 5/37 (13.5%) at the third attempt. There were no overall failures for intubating laryngeal mask airway insertion or tracheal intubation. There were no differences in success rate between positions. Oesophageal intubation was detected and corrected in 2/37 (5%). CONCLUSION: The intubating laryngeal mask airway has a high success rate as a ventilatory device and as a flexible lightwand-guided airway intubator during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation by a well-trained emergency physician. This technique may be particularly useful when there is limited access to the head and neck.     

The intubating laryngeal mask Use in failed and difficult intubation

The use of the intubating laryngeal mask in three patients is described. In two patients for whom tracheal intubation using traditional techniques had failed, the intubating laryngeal mask was used to achieve successful tracheal intubation. The trachea of one of these patients was subsequently re-intubated for a second procedure using the same technique. A third patient with a cervical spine fracture whose trachea was electively intubated using the intubating laryngeal mask is also presented.     

Detection and correction of accidental oesophageal intubation during flexible lightwand-guided intubation via the intubating laryngeal mask

In the following two-part study, we determined the efficacy of observation of the light glow to detect correct placement of the tracheal tube after lightwand-guided tracheal intubation via the intubating laryngeal mask (ILM). We also determined the efficacy of a protocol to correct oesophageal intubation in this situation. In study 1, 80 ASA 1-3, anaesthetized, paralysed patients were randomly assigned to have a tracheal tube, preloaded with a flexible lightwand, placed into either the trachea (n=40) or oesophagus (n=40) under laryngoscope guidance. A blinded observer experienced with the lightwand technique determined whether oesophageal or tracheal intubation had occurred by observation of the light glow. In study 2, 1,000 patients, 400 of whom were included in a previous study, underwent flexible lightwand-guided intubation via the ILM. Placement of the tracheal tube in oesophagus or trachea was determined by observation of the glow and verified by capnography. Oesophageal intubation was corrected by adjusting the ILM position using a protocol comprising two adjusting manoeuvres. Observation, verification and correction were by experienced anaesthetists conducting the case. In study 1, oesophageal and tracheal intubation was correctly detected in 38/40 (95%) and 37/40 (92.5%) patients respectively. In study 2, oesophageal and tracheal intubation was correctly detected in 55/55 (100%) and 945/945 (100%) patients respectively. In 40/55 (73%) patients, tracheal intubation was successful at the second attempt and in 13/55 (24%) at the third or fourth attempt. In 2/55 (4%) patients, persistent oesophageal intubation occurred. The sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value were 95%, 92.5% and 92.7% respectively in study 1, and were all 100% in study 2.     

Fastrach laryngeal mask and difficult intubation

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the success rate of intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask airway (LMA-Fastrach) in patients with predictive signs of difficult airway or after intubation failure. STUDY DESIGN: Open prospective study. PATIENTS: The study included 33 adults, 21 with predictive signs of difficult airway and 12 after intubation failure. METHODS: After induction of anaesthesia, the intubating LMA was inserted. Proper insertion was confirmed by easy bag ventilation and capnography. Intubation through the intubating LMA was then carried out with an armoured endotracheal tube. If intubation failed, a second attempt was carried out after a gentle manipulation of the intubating LMA. After two attempts, if intubation remained impossible, fibrescopic intubation through the intubating LMA was carried out. In case of failure the usual tracheal intubation algorithms were used. RESULTS: Tracheal intubation through the intubating LMA was successful in all patients, in 32 on the first attempt and in one on the second. Successful tracheal intubation was possible on the first attempt in 25 patients (76%), on the second in four (12%) and after fibrescopic intubation through the intubating LMA in the four remaining (12%). CONCLUSION: The results of this study confirm that tracheal intubation through the intubating LMA can be recommended in patients with a difficult airway, whether foreseen or not.     

Blind tracheal intubation through two supraglottic devices: i-gel versus Fastrach intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA)

Background and objectivesThe use of supraglottic devices as a means of rescue in patients difficult to intubate or ventilate has increased in the field of anaesthetics and in emergency medicine. This study is designed to evaluate the success rate of blind intubations using two supraglottic devices, the Fastrach ILMA and the i-gel mask.Patients and methodsA total of 80 patients (40 per group) were included. After positioning them a leak test was performed, the glottis view was checked with a fibrobronchoscope, and an attempt was made to introduce an endotracheal tube through the device, and the procedure was repeated. Adequate ventilation was evaluated, as well as the grade of fibrobronchoscope view, the success of the intubation, and the complications observed after their use.ResultsThere were no differences in the incidence of adequate ventilation with either device. The glottis view (Brimacombe scale) was better with i-gel (77.78% versus 68.42%) at the second attempt, but not on the first. A higher percentage of intubations were achieved with the Fastrach ILMA (70% versus 40%; P=.013). The incidence of throat pain was similar with both devices, but post-operative dysphonia was more frequent with i-gel (20% versus 0; P=.0053).ConclusionsBoth devices were equally effective in achieving adequate ventilation; however, the Fastrach ILMA enabled a higher number of intubations to be made than i-gel and with a lower incidence of post-operative dysphonia.     

Use of the intubating laryngeal mask in failed intubation associated with amyloid macroglossia

Editor—Several options are available in the managementof failed intubation. The Intubating Laryngeal Mask (ILM) hasbeen reported to be an effective tracheal intubation guide.¹² We report a case of failed intubation resulting from amyloidmacroglossia managed with the ILM. A 54-year-old man, 160 cm tall and weighing 59 kg, with a pasthistory of systemic amyloidosis and light chain multiple myelomapresented for emergency laparotomy with haematemesis and melaena.Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy     

Failed tracheal intubation using a laryngoscope and intubating laryngeal mask

PURPOSE: To report unexpected failed tracheal intubation using a laryngoscope and an intubating laryngeal mask, and difficult ventilation via a facemask, laryngeal mask and intubating laryngeal mask, in a patient with an unrecognized lingual tonsillar hypertrophy. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 63-yr-old woman, who had undergone clipping of an aneurysm seven weeks previously, was scheduled for ventriculo-peritoneal shunt. At the previous surgery, there had been no difficulty in ventilation or in tracheal intubation. Her trachea remained intubated nasally for 11 days after surgery. Preoperatively, her consciousness was impaired. There were no restrictions in head and neck movements or mouth opening. The thyromental distance was 7 cm. After induction of anesthesia, manual ventilation via a facemask with a Guedel airway was suboptimal and the chest expanded insufficiently. At laryngoscopy using a Macintosh or McCoy device, only the tip of the epiglottis, but not the glottis, could be seen, and tracheal intubation failed. There was a partial obstruction during manual ventilation through either the intubating laryngeal mask or conventional laryngeal mask; intubation through each device failed. Digital examination of the pharynx, after removal of the laryngeal mask, indicated a mass occupying the vallecula. Lingual tonsillar hypertrophy (1 x 1 x 2 cm) was found to be the cause of the failure. Awake fibrescope-aided tracheal intubation was accomplished. CONCLUSIONS: Unexpected lingual tonsillar hypertrophy can cause both ventilation and tracheal intubation difficult, and neither the laryngeal mask nor intubating laryngeal mask may be helpful in the circumstances.     

Conventional tracheal tubes for intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask airway

The laryngeal mask airway (LMA)-Fastrach silicone wire-reinforced tracheal tube (FTST) was specially designed for tracheal intubation through the intubating LMA (ILMA). However, conventional tracheal tubes have been successfully used to accomplish tracheal intubation. We designed this study to evaluate the success rate of blind tracheal intubation through the ILMA by using the FTST, the Rusch polyvinyl chloride tube (PVCT), and the Rusch latex armored tube (LAT). One-hundred-fifty healthy adults of ASA physical status I and II who were undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia were randomly allocated into three groups. FTST (n=50), prewarmed PVCT (n=50), and LAT (n=50) were used for tracheal intubation. Ease of tracheal intubation was assessed by the time taken, the number of attempts, and the number of maneuvers required for success. In addition, numbers of failed intubation attempts and times taken for ILMA removal were also recorded. After surgery, the incidence of trauma, sore throat, and hoarseness was noted. Significantly more frequent success in tracheal intubation was achieved with the PVCT and FTST (96%) compared with the LAT (82%) (P <0.05). Tracheal intubation on the first attempt was similar with the PVCT and FTST (86%) and was significantly more frequent than with the LAT (52%) (P <0.05). Esophageal placement was significantly more frequent with the LAT (29.7%) when compared with the PVCT and FTST (1.8% and 7.4%, respectively) (P <0.05). The authors conclude that a prewarmed PVCT can be used as successfully as the FTST for blind tracheal intubation through the ILMA, whereas the LAT is associated with more frequent failure and esophageal intubation.     

The intubating laryngeal mask airway Fastrach for emergence after carotid endarterectomy

We determine the feasibility of using the intubating laryngeal mask airway Fastrach (ILM) as a ventilatory device during emergence from anesthesia after use as an airway intubator in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Thirty-five patients (ASA 2-3, 53-84 yr) were studied. Induction was with midazolam/fentanyl/etomidate and maintenance was with sevoflurane 1-2% in O2 33-50% and N2O. Neuromuscular blockade was with cisatracurium. Tracheal intubation was with a flexible lightwand via the ILM. After successful intubation, the ILM remained in the pharynx, but with the cuff deflated. After surgery, but before anesthesia was discontinued, baseline cardiovascular variables were recorded. The ILM cuff was then reinflated, the tracheal tube removed, the anesthesia breathing system connected to the ILM and anesthesia discontinued. Any changes in the cardiovascular variables greater than +/- 20% baseline values were noted from cuff reinflation to 1 minute after ILM removal. Any adverse respiratory (laryngospasm, coughing, gagging, stridor, SpO2 <94%, end-tidal carbon dioxide >45 mmHg, regurgitation/aspiration) or electrocardiographic (ST segment or rhythm changes) events were also noted. Patients were questioned about postoperative sore throat at 2 and 24 hr. ILM insertion and intubation through the ILM were successful in all patients. Adequate ventilation was achieved in all patients before intubation and after extubation. The mean (range) time taken from cuff reinflation to ILM removal was 9 (5-21) min. The rate pressure product remained within +/- 20% baseline values in all patients. There were no adverse respiratory or electrocardiographic events. There were no adverse neurological events. The surgical field was satisfactory. Postoperative sore throat occurred in 14% at 2 hr and 0% at 24 hr. We conclude that the ILM can be used as a ventilatory device for emergence from anesthesia after use as an airway intubator for carotid endarterectomy.