Cardiac retransplantation: a 15-year single-center clinical experience

BACKGROUND: Cardiac retransplantation is a controversial therapy because of the shortage of donor hearts. We retrospectively reviewed the short-term and long-term outcomes after cardiac retransplantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-eight cases (18 males, 7 females; mean age, 50.3 +/- 13.5 years) underwent cardiac retransplantation: 25 first retransplantations and 3 second retransplantations. The indications for retransplantation were primary graft failure (PGF) in 11 patients (39.3%), intractable acute cardiac rejection (IACR) in 4 patients (14.3%), and coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV) in 13 patients (46.4%). The patients had been supported as follows: prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB; n = 3), intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP; n = 1), intravenous inotropic support (n = 7), extracorporeal membranoxygenator (ECMO; n = 3), ventricular assist device (VAD; n = 4), and no inotropic support (n = 10). There were 8 deaths within 30 days after retransplantation (28.6%). The overall 1-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year survival rates were 46.4%, 40.6%, 32.5%, and 32.5%, respectively. Acute cardiac rejection was the most common cause of death (43.8%). Thirty-day and 1-year survival rates of IACR, PGF, and CAV were 50.0%/0%, 63.6%/45.5%, and 84.6%/68.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival after retransplantation was acceptable for patients with CAV and PGF; however, we must select patients for retransplantation carefully if the indication is IACR, because of the poor outcome.     

Should we perform heart retransplantation in early graft failure?

Cardiac retransplantation represents the gold standard treatment for a failing cardiac graft but the decision to offer the patient a second chance is often made difficult by both lack of donors and the ethical issues involved. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether retransplantation is a reasonable option in case of early graft failure. Between November 1985 and June 2008, 922 patients underwent cardiac transplantation at our Institution. Of these, 37 patients (4%) underwent cardiac retransplantation for cardiac failure resulting from early graft failure ( n  = 11) or late graft failure (acute rejection: n  = 2, transplant-related coronary artery disease: n  = 24). Survival at 1, 5 and 10 years of patients with retransplantation was 59%, 50% and 40% respectively. An interval between the first and the second transplantation of less than ( n  = 11, all in early graft failure) or more than ( n  = 26) 1 month was associated with a 1-year survival of 27% and 73%, and a 5-year survival of 27% and 65% respectively ( P  = 0.01). The long-term outcome of cardiac retransplantation is comparable with that of primary transplantation only in patients with transplant-related coronary artery disease. Early graft failure is a significant risk factor for survival after cardiac retransplantation and should be considered as an exclusion criteria.     

Pediatric cardiac retransplantation: intermediate-term results

BACKGROUND: Cardiac retransplantation (re-CTx) in children is a controversial therapy, yet it remains the best treatment option to recipients with failing grafts. Our objective was to determine the incidence of re-CTx in a large pediatric population of recipients and evaluate the outcome of such therapy. METHODS: Between November 1985 and November 1999, 347 children underwent cardiac transplantation at the Loma Linda University Medical Center. Of these, 32 children were listed for re-CTx. Ten patients died while waiting, and 22 recipients underwent re-CTx. Median age at re-CTx was 7.1 years (range, 52 days to 20.1 years). RESULTS: Indications for re-CTx were allograft vasculopathy (n = 16), primary graft failure (n = 5), and acute rejection (n = 1). Two patients with primary graft failure underwent retransplantation within 24 hours of the first transplantation procedure while on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Median time interval to re-CTx for the others was 7.2 years (range, 32 days to 9.4 years). Operative mortality for all cardiac re-CTx procedures was 13.6%. Causes of hospital mortality were pulmonary hypertension with graft failure (n = 2) and multiorgan failure (n = 1). Median hospital stay after re-CTx was 14.1 days (range, 6 to 45 days). There was one late death from severe rejection. Actuarial survival at 3 years for re-CTx was 81.9% +/- 8.9% compared with 77.3% +/- 2.6% for primary cardiac transplantation recipients (p = 0.70). CONCLUSIONS: Elective re-CTx can be performed with acceptable mortality. Although the number of patients undergoing retransplantation in this report is small and their long-term outcome is unknown, the intermediate-term survival after re-CTx is similar to that of children undergoing primary cardiac transplantation.     

Cardiac retransplantation: is it justified in times of critical donor organ shortage? Long-term single-center experience

Objective: Survival after heart transplantation has improved significantly over the last decades. There are a growing number of patients that require cardiac retransplantation because of chronic allograft dysfunction. With regard to the critical shortage of cardiac allograft donors the decision to offer repeat heart transplantation must be carefully considered. Methods: Since 1983 a total of 807 heart transplantations have been performed at our institution. Among them 41 patients received cardiac retransplantation, 18 patients because of acute graft failure and 23 because of chronic graft failure. Data were analyzed for demographics, morbidity and risk factors for mortality. The acute and chronic retransplant group was compared to those patients undergoing primary transplantation. Results: The mean interval between primary transplantation and retransplantation was 1.9 days in the acute and 6.7 years in the chronic retransplant group. Mean follow-up was 6.9 years. Baseline characteristics were similar in the primary and retransplant group. Actuarial survival rates at 1, 3, 5 and 7 years after primary cardiac transplantation compared to retransplantation were 83, 78, 72 and 64% vs 53, 50, 47 and 36%, respectively (p < 0.001). Early mortality after acute retransplantation was significantly higher compared to late retransplantation (10/18, 55.6% vs 4/23, 17.4%, p = 0.011). Major causes of death were acute and chronic rejection, infection and sepsis. Conclusions: Cardiac retransplantation is associated with lower survival rates compared to primary transplantation. However, results after retransplantation in chronic graft failure are significantly better compared to acute graft failure. Therefore, we consider cardiac retransplantation in chronic graft failure a justified therapeutic option. In contrast, patients with acute graft failure seem to be inappropriate candidates for cardiac retransplantation.     

Retransplant and Medical Therapy for Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy: International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Registry Analysis

Cardiac retransplantation for heart transplant recipients with advanced cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) remains controversial. The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Registry was used to examine survival in adult heart recipients with CAV who were retransplanted (ReTx) or managed medically (MM). Recipients transplanted between 1995 and 2010 who developed CAV and were either retransplanted within 2 years of CAV diagnosis (ReTx) or alive at ≥2 years after CAV diagnosis, managed medically (MM), without retransplant, constituted the study groups. Donor, recipient, transplant characteristics and long‐term survival were compared. The population included 65 patients in ReTx and 4530 in MM. During a median follow‐up of 4 years, there were 24 deaths in ReTx, and 1466 in MM. Survival was comparable at 9 years (55% in ReTx and 51% in MM; p = 0.88). Subgroup comparison suggested survival benefit for retransplant versus MM in patients who developed systolic graft dysfunction. Adjusted predictors for 2‐year mortality were diagnosis of CAV in the early era and longer time since CAV diagnosis following primary transplant. Retransplant was not an independent predictor in the model. Challenges associated with retransplantation as well as improved CAV treatment options support the current consensus recommendation limiting retransplant to highly selected patients with CAV.     

Long-term experiences on cardiac retransplantation in adults

Background: It remains disputed whether cardiac retransplantation should be performed. This study aimed to evaluate our long-term experiences on cardiac retransplantation in adults. Patients and methods: Between March 1989 and December 2004, 2% (28/1290) of cardiac retransplantations were performed. Results: The reasons for cardiac retransplantation were cardiac allograft vasculopathy (n = 13; 47%), primary graft failure (n = 11; 39%), and refractory acute rejection (n = 4; 14%). The 30-day mortality risk was 29% (acute rejection: 50%; primary graft failure: 36%; cardiac allograft vasculopathy: 15%, p = 0.324), compared to 8.5% for primary cardiac transplantation (p < 0.001). The causes of early death were acute rejection (n = 3; 37%), multiorgan failure (n = 3; 37%), primary graft failure (n = 1; 13%), and right ventricular failure (n = 1; 13%). The late mortality rate was 96/1000 patient-years. The causes of late death were acute rejection (n = 4; 50%), cardiac allograft vasculopathy (n = 2; 25%), multiorgan failure (n = 1; 13%), and infection (n = 1; 13%). The 1-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year survival was respectively 78, 68, 54, and 38% (primary cardiac transplantation), and 46, 41, 32, and 32% (cardiac retransplantation) (p = 0.003). The short-term survival for cardiac retransplantation due to cardiac allograft vasculopathy was likely better than primary graft failure and refractory acute rejection (p = 0.09). Conclusion: The overall outcomes of cardiac retransplantation are significantly inferior to primary cardiac transplantation. Cardiac retransplantation should be only performed for selected patients.     

Long-term survival after cardiac retransplantation: a twenty-year single-center experience

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for survival after cardiac retransplantation and compare the survival after retransplantation with that after primary cardiac transplantation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 952 patients undergoing cardiac transplantation for the treatment of end-stage heart disease at a single center between 1977 and October 1997. Of these, 43 patients (4.5%) underwent cardiac retransplantation for cardiac failure resulting from transplant-related coronary artery disease, rejection, and early graft failure. RESULTS: No significant difference in actuarial patient survival was found by Kaplan-Meier analysis at 1, 2, and 5 years between patients undergoing primary transplantation and those undergoing retransplantation 76%, 71%, and 60% versus 66%, 66%, and 51%, respectively (P =.2). Multivariable analysis identified a shorter interval between transplants and an initial diagnosis of ischemic cardiomyopathy as significant risk factors for death after retransplantation (P =.04 and.03, respectively). Since 1993, when our criteria for patient selection for retransplantation were revised on the basis of earlier experience to exclude patients with allograft dysfunction as a result of primary graft failure and those with intractable acute rejection occurring less than 6 months after transplantation, the survival has been significantly better (<1993 = 45%, 45%, and 33% versus >/=1993 = 94%, 94%, and 94% at 1, 2, and 4 years, respectively, P =.003). CONCLUSION: The long-term outcome of cardiac retransplantation is comparable with that of primary transplantation, especially in patients with transplant-related coronary artery disease. Patient characteristics and other preoperative variables should assist in the rational application of retransplantation to ensure optimal use of donor organs.     

Long-term outcome of immunosuppression withdrawal after liver transplantation

Eighteen liver transplant recipients were followed up for 10 years after a trial of immunosuppression withdrawal. Three groups were identified according to the early outcome of complete (group A, n = 5), partial (group B, n = 9), and unsuccessful (group C, n = 4) withdrawal of immunosuppression. The indications for liver transplantation (LT) (August 1983-December 1988) were as follows: primary biliary cirrhosis (n = 3), primary sclerosing cholangitis (n = 3), Budd-Chiari syndrome (n = 3), acute liver failure (n = 3), hepatitis C virus (HCV) cirrhosis (n = 1), HCV and autoimmune hepatitis (n = 1), HCV and alcohol-related cirrhosis (n = 1), HCV and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (n = 1), cystic fibrosis (n = 1), and liver metastases from testicular teratoma (n = 1). Immunosuppression was based on cyclosporine. All patients experienced 1 or more complications of prolonged immunosuppression (median, 7 years; range, 5-11). Thirteen patients (72%) are alive at a median interval of 17 years (range, 16-21) after LT. Of the 5 patients in group A, 2 currently have normal graft function with no rejection episodes, and 3 have restarted immunosuppression following late low-grade acute rejection (n = 1), retransplantation for chronic rejection (n = 1), and kidney transplantation (n = 1). Of the 9 patients in group B, 5 died. The deaths were due to ruptured arterial pseudoaneurysm following retransplantation, HCC recurrence, cardiac failure, renal failure, and posttransplant lymphoma at 5, 7, 7, 14, and 17 years after LT, respectively. All 4 patients in group C are alive on a full immunosuppressive regimen. Long-term follow-up of 18 LT recipients withdrawn from immunosuppression has shown that at a median of 17 years 10% of patients remain off all immunosuppression.     

Cardiac retransplantation in the cyclosporine era

Between December 1980, when immunosuppression with cyclosporine was introduced, and May 1988, 288 patients underwent primary transplantation for end-stage cardiac disease (group TX). Fourteen patients underwent retransplantation for accelerated graft atherosclerosis (group RTXAGA), and 9 underwent retransplantation for intractable acute allograft rejection (group RTXREJ). Cumulative patient follow-up was 724 patient-years (range, 1 month to 7.5 years; mean, 2.3 years). Within the first 3 postoperative months, no differences were noted between groups for linearized rates of infection or rejection except between the rate of rejection for group TX (1.69 +/- 0.09 events/100 patient-days) and group RTXAGA (0.94 +/- 0.3 events/100 patient-days) (p less than 0.02). No significant differences existed between groups for actuarial rates of remaining rejection-free or infection-free for more than 7.5 years. No significant differences in actuarial survival existed except between group TX (81% +/- 2% at 1 year and 58% +/- 4% at 5 years) and group RTXREJ (44% +/- 17% at 1 year and 44% +/- 0% at 5 years) (p less than 0.05). We conclude that patients who undergo retransplantation for accelerated graft atherosclerosis experience a lower rate of early rejection and similar rates of infection and survival compared with patients who receive primary transplants. Cardiac retransplantation for rejection incurs rejection and infection at rates similar to those of primary procedures. However, patients who undergo retransplantation for rejection survive these complications significantly less often than do patients who receive primary transplants. This information should be considered when scarce donor hearts become available and retransplantation is contemplated.     

Heart retransplantation for heart allograft failure in Chinese heart transplant recipients: NTUH experience

We investigated the short- and long-term results after heart retransplantation in terms of different causes of heart allograft failure. We sought to establish the data of heart retransplantation in Chinese compared with Western counterparts due to differences in heart allograft vasculopathy. From March 1995 to May 2005, eight heart transplantation recipients with allograft failure underwent retransplantation. Heart allograft failure was due to coronary vasculopathy (CAV) in six patients (75%) and acute rejection in two patients (25%). The mean interval to retransplantation was 32 to 84 months (mean 54.3 months). There were five patients who survived after heart retransplantation for CAV and no patient survived after an earlier diagnosis of acute rejection. Heart retransplantation is a feasible method with acceptable long-term survival rate for heart allograft failure. After careful pretransplant evaluation, retransplantation is acceptable. The survival after retransplantation for CAV is notably great than that after acute rejection. Heart retransplantation is the only way for patients who have cardiac allograft failure to achieve long-term survival.     

Immunosuppression withdrawal after auxiliary liver transplantation for acute liver failure

BACKGROUND: The potential for immunosuppression withdrawal is the rationale for auxiliary liver transplantation (AUX) in patients with acute liver failure (ALF). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four AUX were performed in 28 adults and 16 children with ALF secondary to seronegative hepatitis (n = 20; 45%), paracetamol hepatotoxicity (n = 14; 32%), acute viral hepatitis (hepatitis B virus [HBV] n = 3, Epstein-Barr virus n = 1; 9%), drug-induced hepatitis (n = 3; 7%), autoimmune hepatitis (n = 2; 5%), and mushroom poisoning (n = 1; 2%). All patients fulfilled the King's College Hospital transplant criteria for ALF. After partial hepatectomy, 38 patients received a segmental auxiliary graft and six, a whole auxiliary graft. Immunosuppression was based on calcineurin inhibitors and steroids. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (77%) are alive after a median follow-up of 30 months (range 4 to 124). Eight adults and two children died of sepsis (n = 6; 14%) at a median interval of 30 days (range 2 to 66), intraoperative cardiac failure (n = 1), brain edema on postoperative day 8 (n = 1), sudden death on day 35 (n = 1), and multiple organ failure associated with HBV recurrence 4 years after transplantation (n = 1). Three patients underwent retransplantation for small-for-size graft syndrome with sepsis on postoperative day 15 (n = 1) and for ductopenic rejection 4 and 15 months after AUX (n = 2). In 10/31 (32%) survivors (6/18 adults and 4/13 children) immunosuppression was completely withdrawn after a median of 19 months. CONCLUSION: Complete immunosuppression withdrawal can be achieved in a significant proportion of patients after AUX for ALF.     

Does acute cellular rejection correlate with cardiac allograft vasculopathy?

BACKGROUND: Previous studies of the association between acute cellular rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) have yielded conflicting conclusions. We explored a possible association between acute cellular rejection and the extent of CAV, and we found a potential confounding variable that may obscure such an association. METHODS: We investigated 140 patients (mean age, 51 +/- 11 years) who underwent serial intravascular ultrasound examinations at baseline and at 1 year after heart transplantation to assess CAV as change in maximal intimal thickness (CMIT). Patients were classified according to the presence or absence of biopsy-proven myocardial fibrosis. We used a standard biopsy-scoring system and a novel biopsy-scoring system, developed in our institution, to assess acute cellular rejection. Using univariate analysis, we found that CMIT was not associated with acute cellular rejection in the overall patient population (n = 140). However, we observed a correlation between CMIT and acute cellular rejection (standard method, r = 0.30, p = 0.01; novel method, r = 0.51, p < 0.0001) in patients who had no evidence of ischemic injury or fibrosis in their biopsy specimens (n = 57). Step-wise multiple regression showed that the rejection score derived from our novel method was associated more closely with the CMIT than was that derived from the traditional method. CONCLUSIONS: This data indicate that the presence of myocardial fibrosis masks an actuarial association between acute cellular rejection and the development of de novo allograft vasculopathy. As previously suspected, myocardial fibrosis is a marker for non-immune-mediated graft injury independently associated with an increased incidence of CAV.     

Early and late outcomes after cardiac retransplantation

Background

Cardiac retransplantation remains the most viable option for patients with allograft heart failure; however, careful patient selection is paramount considering limited allograft resources. We analyzed clinical outcomes following retransplantation in an academic, tertiary care institution.

Methods

Between 1981 and 2011, 593 heart transplantations, including 22 retransplantations were performed at our institution. We analyzed the preoperative demographic characteristics, cause of allograft loss, short- and long-term surgical outcomes and cause of death among patients who had cardiac retransplantations.

Results

Twenty-two patients underwent retransplantation: 10 for graft vascular disease, 7 for acute rejection and 5 for primary graft failure. Mean age at retransplantation was 43 (standard deviation [SD] 15) years; 6 patients were women. Thirteen patients were critically ill preoperatively, requiring inotropes and/or mechanical support. The median interval between primary and retransplantation was 2.2 (range 0–16) years. Thirty-day mortality was 31.8%, and conditional (> 30 d) 1-, 5- and 10-year survival after retransplantation were 93%, 79% and 59%, respectively. A diagnosis of allograft vasculopathy (p = 0.008) and an interval between primary and retransplantation greater than 1 year (p = 0.016) had a significantly favourable impact on 30-day mortality. The median and mean survival after retransplantation were 3.3 and 5 (SD 6, range 0–18) years, respectively; graft vascular disease and multiorgan failure were the most common causes of death.

Conclusion

Long-term outcomes for primary and retransplantation are similar if patients survive the 30-day postoperative period. Retransplantation within 1 year of the primary transplantation resulted in a high perioperative mortality and thus may be a contraindication to retransplantation.     

Successful retransplantation of the human heart.

Cardiac retransplantation has been performed in five patients at Stanford University Medical Center. Long-term survival and rehabilitation have been achieved in two cases. In the first case retransplantation was performed 57 days after the initial procedure because of persistent acute graft rejection. The second patient underwent retransplantation 27 months postoperatively because of documented accelerated graft atherosclerosis. The major indications for cardiac retransplantation consist of intractable acute rejection and late postoperative graft atherosclerosis. These complications should prompt consideration of cardiac retransplantation in carefully selected cases.     

Retransplantation for end-stage liver disease: a single-center Asian experience

Liver retransplantation carries a significantly higher morbidity and mortality compared with patients after single transplantations. The aim of this study was to review our outcomes in liver retransplantations. From February 1984 to February 2007, 409 liver transplantations were performed on 396 patients, including 13 retransplantations (3.2%) in 12 patients. The mean follow-up was 1.6 ± 0.4 years (range, 0.1-5.2). The mean duration between the first and the second transplantation was 2.8 ± 1.0 years (range, 15 days-11.6 years). The indications for the first liver transplantation included biliary atresia (n = 3), hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis with hepatoma (n = 3), fulminant hepatic failure (n = 2), HBV-related end-stage liver disease (n = 1), hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related end-stage liver disease (n = 1), neonatal hepatitis (n = 1), and glycogen storage disease (n = 1). The indications for retransplantations were secondary biliary cirrhosis (n = 3), veno-occlusive disease-related liver failure (n = 2), hepatic arterial occlusion and graft failure (n = 2), chronic rejection with hepatic graft failure (n = 2), recurrent HBV (n = 1) and de novo HBV-related decompensated cirrhosis (n = 1), and idiopathic graft failure (n = 1). There were 4 living donor and 9 deceased donor liver retransplantations. The cumulative survival rate was 71.4 ± 14.4%, with an estimated mean survival time of 3.9 ± 0.7 years. Our results showed that minimizing the rate of retransplantation was critical to enhance overall patient survival. Moreover, living donor liver retransplantation is another option within the short, yet critical, waiting period, after failure of the first graft. Provided that a suitable living donor is available, we recommend early retransplantation to minimize the risk of morbidity and mortality.     

Does University of Wisconsin solution harm the transplanted heart?

BACKGROUND: University of Wisconsin solution (UW) has been shown to be an effective preservative for the cardiac allograft. Recently, the high potassium content of UW has been implicated in causing coronary endothelial damage, allegedly contributing to development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and eventually to poorer survival. METHODS: We examined our experience using UW for preservation of cardiac allografts between 1990 and 1994 (n = 94), and compared these to hearts preserved with the lower potassium-containing Stanford solution used at our center between 1986 and 1990 (n = 65). Indices of graft function, ischemic injury, CAV incidence, CAV severity, and survival were evaluated. RESULTS: The 2 groups were similar in age, gender, diagnosis, donor inotropic support, donor-recipient weight ratio, incidence of acute graft failure, and cytomegalovirus seroconversion. UW-preserved hearts came from older donors (30.5 vs 24.1 years, p < .001), and were transplanted into more status 1 recipients (56% vs 22%, p < .001), consistent with current trends. Mean ischemic time of UW-preserved hearts was significantly longer (184 vs 155 minutes, p < .005) although time required to wean from bypass was less (45.5 vs 73.8 minutes, p < .001) and there was a trend towards less inotropic requirement. CPK-MB release was less with UW preservation (63 vs 87 microg/ dL, p = .001). Three years after transplantation, both groups were similar in the incidence of CAV (UW, 27.3%; STNF, 37.5%; p = 0.27), and also the severity of CAV (p = 0.78). Deaths attributed to CAV were equal in each group (UW, 11.4% vs STNF, 10.7%; p = 0.79). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed equivalent survival curves (p = 0.26). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that UW is a safe and effective myocardial preservative, allowing longer ischemic times with equivalent graft function. Our data suggest that when UW is used for cardiac allograft preservation, both CAV and survival are comparable to the experience with other preservatives containing lower concentrations of potassium.     

The results of cardiac retransplantation: an analysis of the Joint International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation/United Network for Organ Sharing Thoracic Registry

BACKGROUND: It is well established that repeat heart transplantation has a significantly worse outcome when compared with primary (first time) transplantation. Defining the risk factors for mortality within this group has been difficult due to small numbers of patients at individual centers. METHODS: All cardiac retransplants performed in the United States and registered in the Joint International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT)/United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Thoracic Registry were analyzed for demographics, morbidity posttransplantation, immunosuppression, and risk factors for mortality. RESULTS: The study cohort included 514 patients of which 81% were male with a mean age of 47+/-12 years. Time from primary transplant to retransplantation ranged from 1 day to 15.5 years and more than 50% of the patients underwent retransplantation for chronic rejection. More than 60% of patients were in the intensive care unit at the time of retransplantation and more than 40% of the patients were reported to be on some form of life support (ventricular assist device, ventilator, and/or inotropic therapy). Survival for the entire retransplant cohort was 65, 59, and 55% for 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively, but was substantially lower when the intertransplant interval was short. Conversely, when the interval between primary and retransplantation was more than 2 years, 1 year survival postretransplantation approached that of primary transplantation. Additional independent risk factors for mortality for the retransplant cohort included overall cardiac transplant center volume, the use of a ventricular assist device or ventilator, the patient being in the intensive care unit, and recipient age. The four most common causes of death were infection, primary/nonspecific graft failure, chronic rejection (allograft vasculopathy), and acute rejection. CONCLUSIONS: The data confirm that repeat heart transplantation is a higher risk procedure than primary transplantation, especially early after the primary heart transplant.     

Cardiac retransplantation: a viable option? The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.

To evaluate cardiac retransplantation as an appropriate utilization of scarce donor organs we analyzed data from the registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) (n = 449) and the Utah Cardiac Transplant Program (n = 20). Actuarial survival among retransplants was lower than in patients who received only one transplant in both the ISHLT registry patients (1 year survival, 48% versus 78%; p = 0.001) and the Utah series (1 year survival, 74% versus 88%; p = 0.06). Uncontrolled rejection, short interval (< 6 months) between transplantations, and the need for mechanical circulatory support were identified as risk factors for retransplantation. The incidence of rejection and infection was similar in first and second transplant recipients. Second transplant recipients had a higher level of sensitization, a greater incidence of donor-specific positive crossmatches, and an increased early mortality. Repetition in the second donor of mismatched HLA antigens present in the first donor did not adversely affect survival. If patients who underwent retransplantation within 6 months of their initial transplantation, those receiving transplants for uncontrolled rejection, and those requiring mechanical assistance were eliminated from the study, the short-term and long-term survival after cardiac retransplantation does not differ from that in patients having a single transplant.     

Dobutamine stress echocardiography predicts cardiac events or death in asymptomatic patients long-term after heart transplantation: 4-year prospective evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) remains the major cause of death after cardiac transplantation during long-term follow-up. Nevertheless, annual angiographic evaluation is difficult to perform routinely. We evaluated the value of clinical risk factors and non-invasive testing for cardiac allograft vasculopathy in predicting cardiac events or death in asymptomatic patients with normal ventricular function during long-term follow-up after heart transplantation. METHODS: We studied 39 patients, mean aged 48 +/- 13 years, at 86 +/- 31 months after heart transplantation. Patients underwent thallium scintigraphy, treadmill stress testing, dobutamine stress echocardiography, and angiography to detect CAV. We prospectively observed all patients an additional 4 years for acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, or death. RESULTS: Angiography detected CAV in 15 patients (38%). Three patients had acute myocardial infarction and another 7 had congestive heart failure, representing 25% of cardiac events during the study period. Nine deaths (23%) occurred during the same observation time. Univariate analysis showed that increased body mass index, positive dobutamine stress echocardiography results, and positive angiography results were associated significantly with cardiac events or death during follow-up. In the absence of coronary angiography, stepwise logistic regression identified positive dobutamine echocardiography results as the unique independent predictor of cardiac events (p = 0.001) or death (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Cardiac events and death after heart transplantation increased during long-term follow-up of this population. However, dobutamine stress echocardiography is well tolerated and, in the absence of routine angiographic evaluation, may be a strong predictor of these events.     

Pediatric liver retransplantation: indications and outcome

INTRODUCTION: Liver transplantation is the only treatment for end-stage liver disease. Not all patients have a favorable outcome. Graft failure secondary to primary nonfunction, vascular complications, or chronic rejection among other problems may lead to retransplantation. Retransplantation represents 8% to 29% of liver transplantations in the pediatric population. The aim of this study was to present our experience with retransplanted children by analyzing the indications and the results. METHODS: All patients were prospectively included in our database, including 125 children. We included the indications for retransplantation, complications, and mortality. Kaplan-Meier curves were used for survival analysis. RESULTS: Since 1994, 125 patients were transplanted and 25 were retransplanted (20%), including 5 who received a third graft. Primary nonfunction represented 30% of the indications for retransplantation and hepatic artery thrombosis, 20%. Six of 25 patients who received a first retransplantation and 2 of 5 who received a second retransplantation died. The most frequent cause of death was multiorgans failure. The survivals at 1 and 5 years were 82% and 76% for children receiving a first retransplantation, and 60% at 1 and 5 years for those who received a second retransplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Organ failure after liver transplantation was a common event in pediatric transplantation. Survival was similar between patients transplanted once and those who received one retransplantation. Survival decreased among patients who received a third graft but was maintained at 60%, which is better than most published results for first retransplanted patients. Retransplantation is a valid option with good results for selected pediatric cases.