Interference screw fixation of cervical grafts: a biomechanical study of a new method of cervical fixation.

The dislodgement of anterior bone graft in the cervical spine is a frequent complication of attempted fusion following discectomy or corpectomy. It has been hypothesized that fixation augmented with interference screws may increase the pull-out strength of the construct and decrease the rate of these complications. Mechanical tests were conducted to compare interference screw fixation methods for enhancing the fixation between the bone graft and the adjacent vertebra. The anterior pull-out strengths of cervical bone grafts were compared using fixation with and without the addition of interference screws. Both discectomy and corpectomy graft models were examined in vitro. The mean pull-out force for a Smith-Robinson type bone graft alone was 58.1 N (SD +/- 11.4 N); for the graft augmented with two 3.5 mm cancellous bone screws, 153.9 N (+/- 58.9 N); for the graft with four 3.5 mm screws, 217.1 N (SD +/- 69.9 N). The pull-out strengths of the two and four 3.5 mm screw constructs were significantly greater than the strength of the graft alone (p less than 0.05). Similarly placed 2.7 mm cortical screws of the same length provided increased pull-out strength (123.7 N +/- 38.6 N and 142.5 N +/- 38.2 N for two and four screws, respectively); however, in comparison to the graft alone, these differences were not statistically significant. For both screw types, the four screw fixations were stronger than the two-screw fixations, although these differences were not statistically different.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The role of the dorsal vertebral cortex in the stability of transpedicular screws. A biomechanical study in human cadaveric vertebrae

The aim of this biomechanical study was to investigate the role of the dorsal vertebral cortex in transpedicular screw fixation. Moss transpedicular screws were introduced into both pedicles of each vertebra in 25 human cadaver vertebrae. The dorsal vertebral cortex and subcortical bone corresponding to the entrance site of the screw were removed on one side and preserved on the other. Biomechanical testing showed that the mean peak pull-out strength for the inserted screws, following removal of the dorsal cortex, was 956.16 N. If the dorsal cortex was preserved, the mean peak pullout strength was 1295.64 N. The mean increase was 339.48 N (26.13%; p = 0.033). The bone mineral density correlated positively with peak pull-out strength. Preservation of the dorsal vertebral cortex at the site of insertion of the screw offers a significant increase in peak pull-out strength. This may result from engagement by the final screw threads in the denser bone of the dorsal cortex and the underlying subcortical area. Every effort should be made to preserve the dorsal vertebral cortex during insertion of transpedicular screws.     

Pullout strength comparison of two methods of orienting screw insertion in the lateral masses of the bovine cervical spine.

We undertook a biomechanical study to compare the pullout strength of 3.5-mm AO screws placed in two different orientations within the bovine cervical spine. The first set of screws were oriented obliquely and passed through the lateral mass, as recommended by the AO group. The orientation of the second set was anterior to posterior through the lateral mass, as recommended by Roy-Camille. All screw holes were drilled and tapped by a spinal surgeon experienced with both techniques. Pullout force was measured on an Instron materials testing machine using a self-centering screw-holding chuck and loading rate of 0.833 mm/sec. Although the bone strength in the Roy-Camille orientation was greater (46.7 N/mm versus 36.1 N/mm, p < 0.05), the overall mean pullout force for the AO orientation was greater (607 N versus 471 N, p < 0.025) due to the longer length of bone available for screw purchase (17.0 mm versus 10.3 mm).     

Screw pull-out force is dependent on screw orientation in an anterior cervical plate construct

Two common justifications for orienting cervical screws in an angled direction is to increase pull-out strength and to allow use of longer screws. This concept is widely taught and has guided implant design. Fixed versus variable angle systems may offer strength advantages. The purpose of our study is to test the influence of screw orientation and plate design on the maximum screw pull-out load. Variable and fixed angle 4.0 x 15 mm and 4.0 x 13 mm self-tapping screws were used to affix a Medtronic Atlantis cervical plate to polyurethane foam bone samples (density 0.160/cm). This synthetic product is a model of osteoporotic cancellous bone. The fixed angle screws can only be placed at 12 degrees convergent to the midline and 12 degrees in the cephalad/caudal ("12 degrees up and in") direction. Three groups were tested: (1) all fixed angle screws, (2) variable angle, all screws 12 degrees up and in, (3) variable angle, all screws 90 degrees to the plate. Plate constructs were pulled off with an Instron DynaMight 8841 servohydrolic machine measuring for maximum screw pull-out force. There was no difference between group 1, fixed angle (288.4 +/- 37.7 N) (mean +/- SD) and 2, variable angle group (297.7 +/- 41.31 N P< or =0.73). There was a significant increase in maximum pull-out force to failure for the construct with all screws at 90 degrees (415.2+/-17.4 N) compared with all screws 12 degrees "up and in" (297.4 +/- 41.3 N, P< or =0.0016). Group 3 done with 13 mm screws, showed a trend toward better pull-out strength, compared to group 2 w/15 mm screws (345.2 +/- 20.5 vs. 297.4 +/- 41.3, P< or =0.06). In this plate pull-out model, screw orientation influences maximum force to failure. When all 4 screws are 90 degrees to the plate the construct has the greatest ability to resist pullout. Fixed angle designs show no advantage over variable angle. These findings are contrary to current teaching.     

Cervical spine pedicle screws: a biomechanical comparison of two insertion techniques

STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical testing of the pullout strengths of pedicle screws placed by two different techniques in adult human cadaveric cervical spines. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether there is a significant difference in screw purchase of two commonly proposed methods of cervical pedicle screw insertion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Wiring techniques remain the gold standard for posterior cervical fixation. However, absent or deficient posterior elements may dictate the use of alternative fixation techniques. Cervical pedicle screws have been shown to have significantly higher pullout strength than lateral mass screws. METHODS: Fifty fresh disarticulated human vertebrae (C3-C7) were evaluated with computed tomography for anatomic disease and pedicle morphometry. The right and left pedicles were randomly assigned to either a standard method or the Abumi insertion method. In the latter technique the cortex and cancellous bone of lateral mass are removed with a high-speed burr, which provides a direct view of the pedicle introitus. The pedicle is then probed and tapped and a 3.5-mm cortical screw inserted. Each screw was subjected to a uniaxial load to failure. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the mean pullout resistance between the Abumi (696 N) and standard (636.5 N) insertion techniques (P = 0.41). There was no difference in pullout resistance between vertebral levels or within vertebral levels. Two (4%) minor pedicle wall violations were observed. CONCLUSION: In selected circumstances pedicle screw instrumentation of the cervical spine may be used to manage complex deformities and patterns of instability. Surgeons need not be concerned about reduced screw purchase when deciding between the Abumi method and its alternatives.     

Cervical anterior transpedicular screw fixation (ATPS)—Part II. Accuracy of manual insertion and pull-out strength of ATPS

Reconstruction after multilevel decompression of the cervical spine, especially in the weakened osteoporotic, neoplastic or infectious spine often requires circumferential stabilization and fusion. To avoid the additional posterior surgery in these cases while increasing rigidity of anterior-only screw-plate constructs, the authors introduce the concept of anterior transpedicular screw (ATPS) fixation. We demonstrated its morphological feasibility as well as its indications in a previous study in Part I of our project. Consequently, the objectives of the current study were to assess the ex vivo accuracy of placing ATPS into the cervical vertebra as well as the biomechanical performance of ATPS in comparison to traditional vertebral body screws (VBS) in terms of pull-out strength (POS). Twenty-three ATPS were inserted alternately to two screws into the pedicles and vertebral bodies, respectively, of six cadaveric specimens from C3–T1. For insertion of ATPS, a manual fluoroscopically assisted technique was used. Pre- and post insertional CT-scans were used to assess accuracy of ATPS insertion in the axial and sagittal planes. A newly designed grading system and accuracy score were used to delineate accuracy of ATPS insertion. Following insertion of screws, 23 ATPS and 22 VBS were subjected to pull-out testing (POT). The bone mineral density (BMD) of each specimen was assessed prior to POT. Statistical analysis showed that the incidence of correctly placed screws and non-critical pedicles breaches in axial plane was 78.3%, and 95.7% in sagittal plane. Hence, according to our definition of “critical” pedicle breach that exposes neurovascular structures at risk, 21.7% (n = 5) of all ATPS inserted showed a critical pedicle breach in axial plane. Notably, no critical pedicle perforation occurred at the C6 to T1 levels. Pull-out testing of ATPS and VBS revealed that pull-out resistance of ATPS was 2.5-fold that of VBS. Mean POS of 23 ATPS with a mean BMD of 0.566 g/cm² and a mean osseus screw purchase of 27.2 mm was 467.8 N. In comparison, POS of 22 VBS screws with a mean BMD of 0.533 g/cm² and a mean osseus screw purchase of 16.0 mm was 181.6 N. The difference in ultimate pull-out strength between the ATPS and VBS group was significant (p < 0.000001). Also, accuracy of ATPS placement in axial plane was shown to be significantly correlated with POS. In contrast, there was no correlation between screw-length, BMD, or level of insertion and the POS of ATPS or VBS. The study demonstrated that the use of ATPS might be a new technique worthy of further investigation. The use of ATPS shows the potential to increase construct rigidity in terms of screw-plate pull-out resistance. It might diminish construct failures during anterior-only reconstructions of the highly unstable decompressed cervical spine. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

异体皮质骨板不同固定方式的生物力学比较

目的探讨异体皮质骨板采用不同固定方式的强度差异及机制。方法由南华大学解剖室提供的14具(男8具,女6具)尸体上取下股骨27根,X线排除骨病后,用游标卡尺测量,取各骨最细部分的直径,制作27个不稳定骨折模型,随机分成A、B、C组,每组9个,分别采用3种方式固定:A组:用2块大小为110mm×10mm×3mm异体皮质骨板嵌合固定;B组:用2块110mm×10mm×3mm异体皮质骨板和5枚骨螺钉固定;C组:用1块110mm×10mm×3mm骨板和5枚骨螺钉固定。分别进行生物力学实验,测试其压缩、弯曲及扭转刚度和极限载荷。结果不同固定方式显示不同的力学特征。A组的轴向刚度与B组相似,且高于C组,但抗弯和扭转刚度显著高于B、C两组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组的压缩、弯曲、扭转极限载荷分别为1.65±0.34kN,554.33±49.34N,7.78±0.82Nm;B组分别为1.12±0.37kN,428.00±37.40N,3.39±0.22Nm,两组比较有统计学意义(P<0.05),而C组分别为0.71±0.46kN,218.67±36.53N,1.74±0.12Nm,与A组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论异体皮质骨板固定的强度与固定方式有关。双板嵌合固定比骨板骨螺钉固定具有更大的强度和刚度,可满足临床需要。     

Hydroxyapatite-coating of pedicle screws improves resistance against pull-out force in the osteoporotic canine lumbar spine model: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: In patients with spinal osteoporosis, the early achievement and maintenance of a biological bond between the pedicle screw and bone is important to avoid screw loosening complications. There are few reports of in vivo investigations involving biomechanical and histological evaluations in the osteoporotic spine. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of hydroxyapatite (HA)-coating on the pedicle screw in the osteoporotic lumbar spine and to investigate the relationship between resistance against the screw pull-out force and bone mineral density (BMD) of the vertebral body. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Mechanical and pathological investigations in the lumbar spine. METHODS: Two 24-month-old female beagle dogs were fed a calcium-free dog chow for 6 months after ovariectomy (OVX). BMD (in g/cm2) was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at pre-OVX and 6 months after OVX. Pedicle screws were placed from L1 to L6 at 6 months after OVX. Twenty-four pure titanium cortical screws (Synthes, #401-114) were used as pedicle screws (Ti-PS). Of these, 12 screws had HA-coating (HA-PS). The HA-PS screws were inserted into the right pedicles and the Ti-PS were inserted into the left pedicles. Ten days after this procedure, the lumbar spines were removed en bloc for screw pull-out testing and histological evaluation. RESULTS: The mean BMD value of the lumbar vertebrae 6 months after the OVX was 0.549+/-0.087 g/cm2, which was significantly less than the pre-OVX mean BMD of 0.603+/-0.092 g/cm2 (p < 0.001). The mean resistance against the pull-out force for the HA-PS was significantly greater at 165.6+/-26.5N than in the Ti-PS (103.1+/-30.2N, p < .001). The histological sections in the HA-PS clearly revealed new bone bonding with the apatite coating but only fibrous tissue bonding in the Ti-PS. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study showed that the resistance to the pull-out force of HA-PS is 1.6 times that of Ti-PS. Furthermore, HA-PS has superior biological bonding to the surrounding bone, as early as 10 days after surgery in this osteoporotic spine model. Thus, in patients with osteoporosis, coating of the pedicle screw with HA may provide better stability and bonding between the pedicle screw and bone in the early postoperative period.     

The effects of cyclic loading on pull-out strength of sacral screw fixation: an in vitro biomechanical study

STUDY DESIGN: The pull-out strength of sacral screw fixation after cyclic loading was tested using young human cadaveric specimens. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of fatigue loading on the pull-out strength of medial and lateral unicortical and bicortical sacral screws and to correlate the pull-out strength with sacral bone density and the screw insertion torque. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The immediate biomechanical effects of depth of penetration, screw orientation, and bone density on sacral screw fixation have been studied in aged cadaveric specimens. The effect of cyclic loading on the pull-out strength of sacral screw fixation is unknown, however, and data from young specimens is rare. METHODS: Eleven fresh specimens of human sacrum were used in this study. Bone mineral density at the vertebral body and the ala were determined by peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Seven-millimeter compact Cotrel-Dubousset sacral screws were inserted into the sacrum anteromedially and anterolaterally, both unicortically and bicortically, and the insertion torque for each screw was measured. Cyclic loading from 40 to 400 N was applied to each screw at a frequency of 2 Hz up to 20,000 cycles. Pull-out tests were conducted after completion of the fatigue tests. RESULTS: The average bone density was 0.38 +/- 0.08 g/mL at the S1 body and 0.24 +/- 0.05 g/mL at the S1 ala. The insertion torque and average pull-out force after cyclic loading were significantly higher for bicortical fixation than for unicortical fixation for a particular screw alignment. The pull-out strength and insertion torque of medially oriented fixation was always higher than that for lateral fixation, however, regardless of whether the insertion was unicortical or bicortical. The pull-out force of unicortical and bicortical medial screw fixations after cyclic loading showed significant linear correlations with both the insertion torque and the bone mineral density of the S1 body. CONCLUSIONS: In a young population, screw orientation (anterolateral or anteromedial) was more important in determining pull-out strength than screw depth (unicortical or bicortical) after fatigue loading, anteromedially directed screws being significantly stronger than laterallyplaced screws. Bone mineral density of the S1 body andinsertion torque were good preoperative and intraoperative indicators of screw pull-out strength.     

The stability of bone screws in the os sacrum

A variety of points of insertion and implantation techniques are recommended for inserting screws into the os sacrum. On the basis of 16 complete human sacrum specimens the following axial pull-out tests were performed: 1. Insertion of convergent measuring screws, 6.0 mm and 7.0 mm in outside diameter respectively, into the body of vertebra S1 using a monocortical and bicortical technique respectively with perforation of the ventral cortex. 2. Insertion of divergent screws into the ala sacralis at the level of S1 with 6-mm and 7 mm screws respectively, using a monocortical technique without perforation of the ventral cortex. 3. Insertion of convergent 6-mm screws into the body of vertebra S2 using a monocortical and bicortical technique respectively with perforation of the ventral cortex. The highest axial pull-out force was reached using convergent 6-mm screws inserted into the body of vertebra S1 using the bicortical technique with perforation of the ventral cortex (2392.4 N). The use of a 7.0-mm screw in the same implantation technique did not result in higher pull-out forces (2274.7 N). The monocortical technique reached a pull-out force of 1657.53 N with a 6-mm screw and 1505.64 N with a 7-mm screw. Convergent insertion of 6-mm screws into the body of S2 resulted in pull-out forces of 537.02 N using a bicortical and only 297.71 N using a monocortical technique. Divergent insertion of screws into the ala sacralis reached a maximal pull-out force of 495.47 N using 6-mm screws and 449.79 N using 7-mm screws. These data resulted from a monocortical implantation technique without perforation of the ventral cortex of the ala sacralis. The results of the present biomechanical study show that convergent bicortical implantation in the body of S1 is the most stable technique for screw fixation in the sacrum. The use of 7-mm rather than 6-mm screws did not lead to increased primary stability. Anatomic studies have shown that a safe area exists in the region of the ventral promontory, so this implantation technique appears to be unobjectionable. Received: 3.0.5 May 1997 Revised: 4 October 1997 Accepted: 2 February 1998     

单侧枢椎椎板螺钉在椎动脉变异的上颈椎不稳中的临床应用

目的：探讨后路寰椎侧块螺钉联合单侧枢椎椎板螺钉＋对侧枢椎椎弓根螺钉固定、自体双皮质骨加压植骨融合术治疗上颈椎不稳伴椎动脉变异的临床疗效。方法：2008年6月至2012年12月,行后路寰椎侧块螺钉联合单侧枢椎椎板螺钉＋对侧枢椎椎弓根螺钉固定、自体双皮质骨加压植骨融合术12例,男8例,女4例,年龄16—77岁,平均47．5岁。术前患者枕颈部活动受限伴或不伴疼痛,VAS评分0-7分,平均3．50±2．71;椎动脉造影或颈椎CTA示单侧椎动脉明显狭窄。观察术中有无神经及血管损伤;术后7d内行X线和CT检查,了解内固定位置;术后随访观察有无内固定松动、断裂失败并发症、复位丢失,以及植骨融合率等。结果：12例单侧枢椎椎板螺钉固定,术中未发生神经和椎动脉损伤。患者颈部VAS评分0．92±0．90,较术前明显减轻（P=0．01）。术后x线示12例患者颈椎序列恢复良好,CT示1例枢椎椎板腹侧皮质侵犯,余位置均良好。12例患者均获得随访,时间6个月～3年;未见内固定松动、断裂和复位丢失等并发症;术后6个月12例均骨性融合。结论：后路寰椎侧块螺钉联合单侧枢椎椎板螺钉＋对侧枢椎椎弓根螺钉固定、自体双皮质骨加压植骨融合术,既避免了传统螺钉固定椎动脉损伤的同时,又克服了部分病例双侧枢椎椎板螺钉时植骨床的不足,在保证良好力学稳定的情况下,可以取得良好的骨性融合率。单侧枢椎椎板螺钉可以作为一种安全有效的补充固定措施应用于椎动脉变异的上颈椎不稳患者中。     

A biomechanical analysis of the self-retaining pedicle hook device in posterior spinal fixation

Regular hooks lack initial fixation to the spine during spinal deformity surgery. This runs the risk of posterior hook dislodgement during manipulation and correction of the spinal deformity, that may lead to loss of correction, hook migration, and post-operative junctional kyphosis. To prevent hook dislodgement during surgery, a self-retaining pedicle hook device (SPHD) is available that is made up of two counter-positioned hooks forming a monoblock posterior claw device. The initial segmental posterior fixation strength of a SPHD, however, is unknown. A biomechanical pull-out study of posterior segmental spinal fixation in a cadaver vertebral model was designed to investigate the axial pull-out strength for a SPHD, and compared to the pull-out strength of a pedicle screw. Ten porcine lumbar vertebral bodies were instrumented in pairs with two different instrumentation constructs after measuring the bone mineral density of each individual vertebra. The instrumentation constructs were extracted employing a material testing system using axial forces. The maximum pull-out forces were recorded at the time of the construct failure. Failure of the SPHD appeared in rotation and lateral displacement, without fracturing of the posterior structures. The average pull-out strength of the SPHD was 236 N versus 1,047 N in the pedicle screws (P < 0.001). The pull-out strength of the pedicle screws showed greater correlation with the BMC compared to the SPHD (P < 0.005). The SPHD showed to provide a significant inferior segmental fixation to the posterior spine in comparison to pedicle screw fixation. Despite the beneficial characteristics of the monoblock claw construct in a SPHD, that decreases the risk of posterior hook dislodgement during surgery compared to regular hooks, the SPHD does not improve the pull-out strength in such a way that it may provide a biomechanically solid alternative to pedicle screw fixation in the posterior spine.     

Placement of anterior cervical instrumentation without intraoperative radiography.

Adequate fixation with several commonly used anterior cervical plate systems requires that the screws penetrate both the anterior and posterior cortices of the vertebral bodies. This report emphasizes the shortcomings of plain film and fluoroscopic examinations in confirming screw position through the posterior vertebral cortex in three patients with lower cervical trauma or tumor. These cases and radiographs of isolated vertebrae from the cervicothoracic region demonstrate the inadequacy of plain film/fluoroscopy for determination of the position of anterior cervical plate screws in relation to the posterior cortex. Only axial images such as those obtained with computed tomography are able to show the exact relationship of the screws to the posterior cortical curvature in C7 and T1.     

A simplified technique for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using a screw-plate implanted over the Caspar distractor pins

The author presents a simplified technique for midline screw-plate fixation in fusion procedures after anterior cervical discectomy, in which the plate is introduced over the Caspar distractor pins. The Uniplate system used, with a single screw in each vertebral body, minimizes bone damage to the vertebral body as the screws can be fixed in the holes previously used for the Caspar distractor pins. This simplified version of the classical anterior cervical fusion technique saves surgical time, facilitates screw insertion, and obviates the need for manipulations to stabilize the plate before the screws are inserted. It provides immediate stability comparable to other plate systems. To the author's knowledge, this is the first report on cervical fusion with the Uniplate system with the plate being introduced over the Caspar distractor pins.     

Biomechanical evaluation of a newly developed monocortical expansion screw for use in anterior internal fixation of the cervical spine. In vitro comparison with two established internal fixation systems

STUDY DESIGN: The primary biomechanical stability of anterior internal fixation of the cervical spine obtained with a new monocortical expansion screw in vitro was evaluated. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the anterior internal fixation of the spine obtained with the new monocortical expansion screw provides biomechanical stability comparable with that obtained with bicortical fixation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The anterior plate instrumentation used with bicortical screw fixation in the cervical spine provides a primary stability superior to that associated with monocortical screw fixation. However, bicortical screws have the potential to perforate the posterior cortex. Therefore, monocortical instrumentation systems were developed, but without the biomechanical stability associated with bicortical systems. A new expansion screw for monocortical fixation was developed to improve biomechanical stability of monocortical systems. METHODS: Three different internal fixation systems were compared in this study: 1) H-plate with AO 3.5-mm bicortical screws, 2) cervical spine locking plate with monocortical screws, and 3) H-plate with the new monocortical expansion screws. Eight fresh human cadaver spine segments from C4 to C7 were tested in flexion-extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending using pure moments of +/- 2.5 Nm without axial preload. Five conditions were investigated consecutively: 1) intact spine; 2) uninstrumented spine with the segment C5-C6 destabilized; 3-5) instrumentation of the segment C5-C6 with the three implants mentioned above after removal of the disc and insertion of an interbody spacer. RESULTS: Between bicortical and monocortical expansion screw H-plate fixation, no significant differences were observed in all load cases concerning range of motion and neutral zone. The neutral zone and range of motion were significantly larger for the cervical spine locking plate than for bicortical and monocortical expansion screw fixation in all load cases, except neutral zone for axial rotation versus bicortical screw fixation. The instrumented cases only had a significantly lower range of motion and neutral zone than the intact cases in extension-flexion, whereas for lateral bending and axial rotation no significant differences could be observed. Because the experimental design precluded any cyclic testing, the data represent only the primary stability of the implants. CONCLUSIONS: In anterior instrumentation of the cervical spine using a H-plate, the new monocortical expansion screw provides the same biomechanical stability as the bicortical 3.5-mm AO screw and a significantly better biomechanical stability than the cervical spine locking plate. Therefore, the expansion screw may be an alternative to the bicortical fixation and does not involve the risk of penetration of the posterior vertebral body cortex.     

经后路寰椎椎弓根螺钉固定的置钉研究

目的探讨经后路寰椎椎弓根螺钉固定的可行性. 方法利用20具颈椎尸体标本,模拟经后路寰椎椎弓根螺钉固定.在寰椎后弓后缘表面,经枢椎下关节突中心点纵垂线与寰椎后弓上缘下方3 mm水平线的交点作为进钉点,按内斜10度、上斜5度钻孔,经寰椎椎弓根置入直径3.5 mm的皮质骨螺钉.测量进钉点与寰椎椎弓根中线平面的距离、螺钉最大进钉深度、螺钉内斜角度和螺钉上斜角度等解剖指标,观察螺钉是否突破椎弓根和侧块骨皮质,以及椎动脉、硬膜、脊髓是否损伤等. 结果共放置40枚寰椎椎弓根螺钉,测得进钉点与寰椎椎弓根中线的平均距离为(2.20±0.42) mm,螺钉最大进钉深度平均(30.51±1.59) mm,螺钉内斜角度平均(9.70±0.67)度,上斜角(4.60±0.59)度.其中1枚螺钉因上斜角度过大穿破椎弓根上缘,8枚因后弓高度过小而突破椎弓根下缘,5枚进钉过深突破寰椎侧块前缘皮质,但均未对脊髓和椎动脉造成损伤. 结论经后路行寰椎椎弓根螺钉固定是安全可行的,但应注意进钉角度和深度.     

Intramedullary nail fixation with posterior-to-anterior compared to transverse distal screw placement for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis: a biomechanical investigation

BACKGROUND: Biomechanical studies on retrograde intramedullary fixation for tibiotalocalcaneal fusion have been reported, but no studies have investigated dorsiflexion stiffness, load-to-failure, fatigue endurance, and plastic deformation using different distal screw orientations. Also, no studies have examined the effect of bone density on different distal screw orientations while using a fatigue loading mode. METHODS: Eight matched pairs of cadaver legs were used. In one leg from each pair an intramedullary nail was inserted with lateral-to-medial distal screws and in the other with posterior-to-anterior screws. These samples underwent dorsiflexion fatigue testing with determination of initial and final stiffness, load-to-failure, and degree of plastic deformation at failure. DEXA scanning was done of each cadaver specimen to determine bone mineral density. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t-test and a Pearson correlation. Significance level was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The specimens with posterior-to-anterior screws had a significantly higher fatigue endurance load-to-failure (1130.0 +/- 362.0 N compared to 801.0 +/- 227 N, p = 0.01). They also had significantly higher final stiffness (203.1 +/- 23.1 N/mm compared to 146.6 +/- 46.2 N/mm, p = 0.05) and lower plastic deformation (2.4 +/- 1.5 mm compared to 3.8 +/- 2.3 mm, p = 0.04). There was a statistically significant correlation between bone mineral density and the difference in construct deformation with posterior-to-anterior and lateral-to-medial screw orientation (r = 0.76, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In this biomechanical investigation of tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with intramedullary nail fixation, posterior-to-anterior distal screw orientation provided more stable fixation than lateral-to-medial screw orientation.     

Comparison of cortical and cancellous screw pull-out strengths about the posterior column and sacroiliac joint

This study addresses the comparative pull-out strengths of cortical (4.5 mm) and fully threaded cancellous (6.5 mm) bone screws from sites about the pelvis commonly used in the fixation of posterior column acetabular fractures and sacroiliac (SI) disruptions. These sites include one from lateral to medial through the posterior column, two from posterolateral to anteromedial across the SI joint, one vertically through the sacral ala, and one vertically through the iliopubic column. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference in the force required for pull-out failure of the cortical versus the cancellous screws at any of the sites tested.     

Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws

Background contextAchieving solid implant fixation to osteoporotic bone presents a clinical challenge. New techniques and devices are being designed to increase screw–bone purchase of pedicle screws in the lumbar spine via a novel cortical bone trajectory that may improve holding screw strength and minimize loosening. Preliminary clinical evidence suggests that this new trajectory provides screw interference that is equivalent to the more traditionally directed trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws. However, a biomechanical study has not been performed to substantiate the early clinical results.PurposeEvaluate the mechanical competence of lumbar pedicle screws using a more medial-to-lateral path (ie, “cortical bone trajectory”) than the traditionally used path.Study designHuman cadaveric biomechanical study.MethodsEach vertebral level (L1–L5) was dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanned and had two pedicle screws inserted. On one side, the traditional medially directed trajectory was drilled and tapped. On the contralateral side, the newly proposed cortical bone trajectory was drilled and tapped. After qCT scanning, screws were inserted into their respective trajectories and pullout and toggle testing ensued. In uniaxial pullout, the pedicle screw was withdrawn vertically from the constrained bone until failure occurred. The contralateral side was tested in the same manner. In screw toggle testing, the vertebral body was rigidly constrained and a longitudinal rod was attached to each screw head. The rod was grasped using a hydraulic grip and a quasi-static, upward displacement was implemented until construct failure. The contralateral pedicle screw was tested in the same manner. Yield pullout (N) and stiffness (N/mm) as well as failure moment (N-m) were compared and bone mineral content and bone density data were correlated with the yield pullout force.ResultsNew cortical trajectory screws demonstrated a 30% increase in uniaxial yield pullout load relative to the traditional pedicle screws (p=0.080), although mixed loading demonstrated equivalency between the two trajectories. No significant difference in construct stiffness was noted between the two screw trajectories in either biomechanical test or were differences in failure moments (p=0.354). Pedicle screw fixation did not appear to depend on bone quality (DXA) yet positive correlations were demonstrated between trajectory and bone density scans (qCT) and pullout force for both pedicle screws.ConclusionsThe current study demonstrated that the new cortical trajectory and screw design have equivalent pullout and toggle characteristics compared with the traditional trajectory pedicle screw, thus confirming preliminary clinical evidence. The 30% increase in failure load of the cortical trajectory screw in uniaxial pullout and its juxtaposition to higher quality bone justify its use in patients with poor trabecular bone quality.