In vitro evaluation of stent patency and in-stent stenoses in 10 metallic stents using MR angiography

In vitro study to investigate the suitability of contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CEMRA) for determination of stent patency and grading of in-stent stenoses in 10 metallic stents. The Acculink carotid, DynaLink, Easy Wallstent, JostentSelfX XF, Luminexx, Omnilink, sinus-SuperFlex, SMART, Symphony and ZA stent were separately placed in a vascular phantom. Dedicated stenoses inside the stents generated a concentric lumen narrowing of 50%. CEMRA was performed for each stent. Signal loss inside the stents and artificial lumen narrowing were assessed objectively using the evaluation software of the MR imager. Moreover, three blinded observers determined visibility of stent patency and in-stent stenoses subjectively on a 3-point scale and graded in-stent stenoses. Loss of signal intensity within the stent lumen ranged between 90% (Wallstent) and 5% (ZA), artificial lumen narrowing between 56% (Symphony) and 22% (ZA). For the Symphony and Wallstent, visibility of patency and in-stent stenoses was impaired and the observers' grading exaggerated the degree of stenoses (by 23% and 33%, respectively). For the remainder of stents, patency and stenoses were visible and stenoses were graded accurately (less than 10% discrepancy from reference standard). In this in vitro study, eight of 10 stents presented with MRI characteristics which enabled determination of stent patency and accurate grading of clinically relevant in-stent stenoses.     

Revealing in-stent stenoses of the iliac arteries: comparison of multidetector CT with MR angiography and digital radiographic angiography in a Phantom model

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the detectability of in-stent stenoses in iliac artery stents using multidetector CT angiography in comparison with MR angiography and digital radiographic angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten different metallic stents (made of steel, nitinol, tantalum, or cobalt) were implanted in plastic tubes (8 mm). The stent lumina were partially obstructed by wax (CT density, -30 H) resulting in 50-60% in-stent stenoses. The tubes were filled with diluted contrast material (25 mmol/L of gadopentetate dimeglumine or 6 mg I/mL of iodinated contrast material) and placed in a plastic container filled with oil or water, respectively. CT angiography was performed on a four-detector CT scanner (detector collimation, 4 x 1 mm; slice thickness, 1.25 mm; table feed, 4 mm per rotation). MR angiography was performed on a 1.5-T system with a three-dimensional gradient-echo sequence (TR/TE, 4.6/1.8; flip angle, 30 degrees; slice thickness, 1.88 mm). Axial and longitudinal reformations of CT and MR imaging data were evaluated regarding the in-stent attenuation and signal intensity, the visible lumen diameter inside the stent, and the delineation of the stenoses. For comparison, digital radiographic angiography was performed as the gold standard. RESULTS: The degree and character of stent-related artifacts differed in CT angiography and MR angiography. In CT angiography, only the tantalum stent caused artifacts that obscured the stenosis; in all other cases, the stenoses were visible. In MR angiography, depiction of stenoses was impaired in two steel stents but possible in the tantalum and most nitinol stents. CONCLUSION: CT angiography is suited for detection of relevant stenoses in steel, cobalt-based, and nitinol stents. MR angiography is superior only in tantalum products.     

Iliofemoral arterial occlusive disease: contrast-enhanced MR angiography for preinterventional evaluation and follow-up after stent placement.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography for the diagnosis of peripheral arterial occlusion and follow-up after stent placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-seven patients (21 women, 46 men; mean age, 64.6 years) were examined. Digital subtraction angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography were performed in 28 patients for preinterventional evaluation of iliofemoral arterial occlusion and in 39 patients for follow-up after stent placement in the iliac or femoral arteries, which had been performed several months before. RESULTS: All 24 occlusions were correctly diagnosed with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Of the 59 stenoses, 36 were greater than 50% and 23 were 50% or less. Sensitivity and specificity for the detection of stenoses greater than 50% were 100% and 83%, respectively. Patency of the different stents was determined correctly with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Some stents caused signal intensity dropout, which made MR evaluation of stents difficult. Generally, these signal intensity artifacts were most severe in stainless steel stents and mild in some nitinol stents. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced MR angiography is comparable to digital subtraction angiography for the detection of stenosis greater than 50% and occlusion in the iliofemoral arteries. Stent patency can be determined, but contrast-enhanced MR angiography is not suitable for stent evaluation owing to signal intensity dropout; however, it provides information about the vascular anatomic areas proximal and distal to the stent.     

Small vessel stents for intracranial angioplasty: in vitro evaluation of in-stent stenoses using CT angiography

Our aim was to determine whether CT angiography is suitable for the evaluation of in-stent restenoses in small vessel stents for intracranial angioplasty. Therefore, we simulated stenoses with degrees of 25, 50, 75 and 90% in a total of 12 stents with different designs (MEDTRONIC AVE; ABBOT BioDivYsio, GUIDANT Neurolink, TERUMO Tsunami, COOK V-Flex Plus) and sizes (3.0 mm, 4.0 mm). For each stenosis, the apparent stenotic degree (ASD) was measured by CT angiography. Subjective (viewing at the CT images) and objective (acquisition of a density profile) evaluations were made after the stents were filled with a solution of 0.9% NaCl and with a diluted contrast medium. It was not possible to visualize the patent lumen in any of the stenotic stent segments by viewing at the CT images. After objective evaluation, the degree of the stenoses was generally overestimated. In the group with the 3.0-mm stents, ASD ranged from 73.6 to 100% in 25% degree stenoses. With the exception of one stent, stenoses with a degree of more than 25% appeared as vessel obstruction (ASD =100%) in the 3.0-mm group. In the 4.0-mm group, the mean ASD was 60% for 25% degree stenoses, 76% for 50% degree stenoses, 91% for 75% degree stenoses and 96% for 95% degree stenoses. The minimum diameter of stents for differentiation between in-stent restenosis and vessel occlusion using CT angiography is 4.0 mm. In CT angiography, the degrees of in-stent stenoses are generally overestimated. The evaluation of in-stent restenoses only seems to be possible when CT angiographic images before and after contrast application are evaluated objectively by density profiles.     

Treatment of complex arteriosclerotic lesions with nitinol stents in the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries: a midterm follow-up.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of nitinol stents in patients with short, complex lesions in the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries and to assess midterm results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Self-expandable nitinol stents were implanted in 54 extremities in 44 patients to treat complex stenoses (n = 32) and occlusions (n = 22) in the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries. Follow-up was performed for 5-51 months to evaluate early thrombosis and midterm patency rates. Midterm patency rates were compared between the following: stenoses and occlusions, proximal and distal locations, good and poor runoff, and diabetic patients and nondiabetic patients. All patients underwent clinical investigation and color Doppler sonography after 1 month and 6 months and at 6-month intervals thereafter. If restenosis or stent thrombosis was suspected, intraarterial digital subtraction angiography of the superficial and popliteal arteries was performed. RESULTS: Percutaneous stent implantation was successful in all patients. The mean duration of follow-up was 27 months (range, 5-51 months). No thrombotic occlusion occurred within the first 4 weeks after stent implantation. The primary 3-year patency rate was 76%, and the secondary patency rate was 87%. Three-year primary patency rates were 65% for diabetic patients and 82% for nondiabetic patients. CONCLUSION: In patients with short, complex stenoses and occlusions, implantation of nitinol stents may have a positive impact on midterm results.     

4D phase contrast flow imaging for in-stent flow visualization and assessment of stent patency in peripheral vascular stents - A phantom study

Purpose

4D phase contrast flow imaging is increasingly used to study the hemodynamics in various vascular territories and pathologies. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and validity of MRI based 4D phase contrast flow imaging for the evaluation of in-stent blood flow in 17 commonly used peripheral stents.

Materials and methods

17 different peripheral stents were implanted into a MR compatible flow phantom. In-stent visibility, maximal velocity and flow visualization were assessed and estimates of in-stent patency obtained from 4D phase contrast flow data sets were compared to a conventional 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) as well as 2D PC flow measurements.

Results

In all but 3 of the tested stents time-resolved 3D particle traces could be visualized inside the stent lumen. Quality of 4D flow visualization and CE-MRA images depended on stent type and stent orientation relative to the magnetic field. Compared to the visible lumen area determined by 3D CE-MRA, estimates of lumen patency derived from 4D flow measurements were significantly higher and less dependent on stent type. A higher number of stents could be assessed for in-stent patency by 4D phase contrast flow imaging (n = 14) than by 2D phase contrast flow imaging (n = 10).

Conclusions

4D phase contrast flow imaging in peripheral vascular stents is feasible and appears advantageous over conventional 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography and 2D phase contrast flow imaging. It allows for in-stent flow visualization and flow quantification with varying quality depending on stent type.     

Contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 1.5 T after implantation of platinum stents: in vitro and in vivo comparison with conventional stent designs

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography characteristics of a new platinum-based balloon-expandable stent system and compare this system with a variety of competing metallic stents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All experiments were performed on 1.5-T scanners. In vitro experiments were performed using 10 stents implanted into a custom-built phantom. Different orientations of the stents along the magnetic field and multiple flip angles were examined. In addition, 19 patients underwent contrast-enhanced MR angiography after the implantation of 36 stents, including four patients with six platinum stents. Angiographic correlation was available for all 19 patients, and luminal patency and stent-induced artifacts were assessed quantitatively. RESULTS: Of the tested balloon-expandable stents, only the platinum-based stents created artifact causing luminal narrowing of 30% or less. All other balloon-expandable stents induced larger artifacts that resulted in higher degrees of narrowing. Thus, if patent, the platinum-based stents allow significant in-stent stenosis to be ruled out reliably. Selected nitinol- or tantalum-based self-expandable stents also are suitable in this regard. CONCLUSION: Of the tested devices, platinum-based stents are the only type of currently available balloon-expandable stent that creates 30% or less artifact-induced apparent stenosis and thus are suitable for MR angiography.     

CT and MR imaging of nitinol stents with radiopaque distal markers

PURPOSE: To evaluate imaging characteristics and artifacts of a nitinol stent with distal tantalum markers with computed tomography (CT) angiography and magnetic resonance (MR) angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A vascular phantom was built to simulate in-stent restenosis. A nitinol stent with tantalum markers (Luminexx stent) was evaluated with CT angiography in different orientations relative to the z-axis and with MR angiography in different positions relative to both B0 and the readout gradient. Stenosis measurements were compared with conventional digital subtraction angiography for both modalities. In-stent signal intensity obtained with different flip angles was assessed in two nitinol stents with distal markers (Luminexx stent and SMART stent) and one without markers (Memotherm-FLEXX stent). RESULTS: Stenosis detection was not possible with CT angiography when the stent was perpendicular to the z-axis because of streak-like artifacts induced by tantalum markers. Stenosis evaluation with multiplanar reformation was accurate when the stent was in parallel and oblique orientations relative to the table axis. With MR angiography, metallic artifacts were mostly related to the stent orientation with B0, whereas orientation of the readout gradient had little influence. The mean error (overestimation) for stenosis measurements varied between 0.1% and 7.4% for CT imaging in parallel and oblique positions and 3.6% and 9.5% for MR imaging. Higher flip angles did not improve signal intensity inside the three stents tested. CONCLUSION: CT and MR angiography can be used for evaluating the patency of stents with distal markers that are parallel or oblique relative to the table axis (iliac, carotid, or femoral stents). MR angiography is preferred if the stent is perpendicular to the table axis (renal stent).     

Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery stent patency with multislice CT: preliminary experience

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography (MSCT-CA) in the detection of in-stent restenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients (33 male, 9 female, mean age 58+/-8 years) previously subjected to percutaneous implantation of coronary stent with suspected in-stent restenosis, underwent a 16-row MSCT (Sensation 16, Siemens) examination. The average time between stent implantation and MSCT-CA was 7.4+/-5.3 months. The following scan parameters were used: collimation 16x0.75 mm, rotation time 0.42 s, feed 3.0 mm/rot., kV 120, mAs 500. After administration of iodinated contrast material (Iomeprol 400 mgI/ml, 100 ml at 4 ml/s) and bolus chaser (40 ml of saline at 4 ml/s) the scan was completed in <20 s. All segments with a stent were assessed by two observers in consensus and were graded according to the following scheme: patent stent, in-stent intimal hyperplasia (IIH) (lumen reduction <50%), in-stent restenosis (ISR) (=/>50%), in-stent occlusion (ISO) (100%). Consensus reading was compared with coronary angiography. RESULTS: Forty-seven stents were assessed (16 in the right coronary artery; 4 in the left main; 22 in the left anterior descending; 5 in the circumflex). In 7 (17%) stents there was ISR (3) or ISO (4), and in 4 (10%) stents there was IIH. The sensitivity and negative predictive values for the detection of ISO were 80% and 98%, respectively, while for the detection of ISR+ISO they were 50% and 89%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although the results are encouraging, the follow-up of stent patency with MSCT-CA does not show a diagnostic accuracy suitable for clinical implementation.     

Repeated intervention for in-stent restenosis of the renal arteries

PURPOSE: To assess the long-term technical success of repeated endovascular intervention in stenosed renal artery stents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with stenoses >or=50% in a renal stent placed because of an ostial atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis were included in this study. In the presence of increased blood pressure or decreased renal function, the in-stent restenosis was treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in the stent or placement of a second stent if the stenosis was located too distally in the stent. The results of these repeat interventions were evaluated by angiography. RESULTS: The 15 patients had a total of 20 stenosed stents. Eighteen of these in-stent stenoses were treated with PTA and two were treated with placement of a second stent. Angiographic follow-up was available in 16 arteries, showing in-stent restenosis in four (25%; mean follow-up, 11 mo). The cumulative patency rates after repeat endoluminal intervention were 93% (95% CI: 80%-106%) and 76% (95% CI: 52%-101%) after 6 and 12 months, respectively. Renal function remained stable or improved in most patients (80%) after repeated intervention in the stent, and hypertension was classified as improved or cured in 47% of patients after 1 year. CONCLUSION: Patients with stenosed renal artery stents can be treated successfully with PTA in a majority of cases, with a long-term success rate of 75% and stable renal function 1 year after repeated intervention.     

Coronary artery stent patency assessed with in-stent contrast enhancement measured at multi-detector row CT angiography: initial experience

The authors investigated the contrast enhancement characteristics of the coronary artery stent lumen to assess patency and then evaluated the accuracy of computed tomographic (CT) measurement of the in-stent luminal diameter. Nineteen patients (16 men and three women; mean age, 58.7 years) with 26 stents underwent cardiac-gated CT angiography with a 16-detector row scanner 1-3 weeks after stent placement. CT images depicted the lumina of 20 stents in 14 patients. CT attenuation measured in the treated lumen was higher than, and correlated highly (r >/= 0.87) with, attenuation in the proximal and distal untreated lumen. Estimated values for in-stent luminal diameter were lower with CT than with conventional angiography (P <.001), and the mean error (16.1%) that resulted from estimation based on sharp-kernel CT images was significantly smaller than that (27.3%) from estimation based on medium-smooth-kernel CT images (P <.001). Visualization of the in-stent lumen at CT angiography with a 16-detector row scanner allows assessment of coronary artery stent patency on the basis of measured contrast enhancement.     

MR imaging-guided stent placement in iliac arterial stenoses: a feasibility study

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-guided stent placement in iliac arterial stenoses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients with 14 iliac arterial stenoses were examined prospectively. Angioplasty was performed through a femoral sheath by using a conventional 1.5-T MR imaging system. Stents and catheters were visualized on the basis of their artifacts. Nitinol stents were placed with gradient-echo MR imaging guidance. Angioplasty balloons were inflated with gadolinium-based contrast material. Results were evaluated clinically and with both digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and contrast material-enhanced MR angiography. RESULTS: Ten of 13 patients were treated with technical success by using MR imaging-guided intervention alone. Three patients were treated with additional fluoroscopic guidance, because complications (ie, panic attack, subintimal recanalization, and stent misplacement) occurred with MR guidance. The quality of the postinterventional contrast-enhanced MR angiograms of three of 12 lesions with stents was limited owing to stent-induced signal loss of the lumen. The mean stenosis degree after stent placement was significantly higher at contrast-enhanced MR angiography than at DSA (24.6% vs 6.2%). The mean MR imaging-guided procedure time was 74 minutes. CONCLUSION: MR imaging-guided stent placement in iliac arteries is feasible in select patients. The presented technique has limitations-that is, long procedure times, lack of real-time monitoring, and stent artifacts-that necessitate further modifications before it can be recommended for clinical use.     

In vivo evaluation of the carotid wallstent on three-dimensional contrast material-enhanced MR angiography: influence of artifacts on the visibility of stent lumina

PURPOSE: Contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography is increasingly used in postinterventional imaging after implantation of endovascular stents. The main limitations are stent-related artifacts compromising the visibility of the stent lumen. The aim of this in vivo study is the evaluation of contrast-enhanced MR angiography imaging characteristics of the carotid Wallstent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The carotid arteries of 29 patients were examined with contrast-enhanced MR angiography 3-6 days and/or 7-23 months after implantation of a carotid Wallstent into the internal carotid artery. Images were evaluated with regard to the diameter and signal intensity (SI) of the visible stent lumen. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was used as the standard of reference. RESULTS: Stent-related artifacts on contrast-enhanced MR angiography caused an artificial lumen narrowing and a reduction of the SI within the stent. Artifacts were pronounced on imaging 3-6 days after stent implantation, but 68% of stents imaged 7-23 months after stent implantation presented with a significantly decreased artificial signal reduction and an improved visibility of the stent lumen. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that a reliable evaluation of the stent lumen is limited as a result of an artificial decrease of the SI inside the stent. However, in follow-up examinations 7-23 months after stent implantation, visibility of the stent lumen was improved and diagnostic reliability of contrast-enhanced MR angiography was markedly increased. A probable explanation for this phenomenon might be the formation of a neointimal layer covering the stent struts and thereby reducing stent-related artifacts.     

Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Since 1996, several preliminary studies have shown the usefulness of contrast material-enhanced MR angiography for imaging supraaortic vessels. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography with that of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. METHODS: A blinded comparison of first-pass contrast-enhanced MR angiography with conventional DSA was performed in 120 patients (240 arteries). MR angiography was performed with a 1.5-T magnet with gradient overdrive equipment, by using a coronal radiofrequency-spoiled 3D fast low-angle-shot sequence after the intravenous injection of gadodiamide. The guidelines of the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial for measuring stenosis of the internal carotid artery were applied on maximum intensity projection (MIP) images and conventional catheter angiograms. RESULTS: Grading of stenoses on MR angiograms agreed with grading of stenoses on DSA images in 89% of arteries. In the severe stenosis group (70-99%), agreement was 93%. All internal carotid occlusions (n = 28) and seven of nine pseudo-occlusions were accurately detected with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. The correlation between MR angiography and DSA for determination of minimal, moderate, and severe stenoses and occlusion was statistically significant (r = 0.91, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: This investigation with a large number of patients confirms that contrast-enhanced MR angiography could become a diagnostic alternative to DSA in the treatment of patients with carotid artery disease.     

Evaluation of peripheral artery stent with 64-slice multi-detector row CT angiography: Prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography

Purpose

To assess the accuracy of 64-slice multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) angiography in the evaluation of peripheral artery in-stent or peristent restenosis, with conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference standard.

Materials and methods

Forty-one patients (30 men, 11 women; mean age, 69.8 ± 9.2 years) with symptomatic peripheral arterial occlusive disease after peripheral artery stenting (81 stented lesions) underwent both conventional DSA and 64-slice MDCT angiography. Each stent was classified as evaluable or unevaluable, and every stent was divided into three segments (proximal stent, stent body, and distal stent), resulting in 243 segments. For evaluation, stenosis was graded as follows: 1, none or slight stenosis (<25%); 2, mild stenosis (25-49%); 3, moderate stenosis (50-74%); 4, severe stenosis or total occlusion (≥75%). Two readers evaluated all CT angiograms with regard to narrowing of in-stent or peristent restenosis by consensus. Results were compared with findings of the DSA.

Results

Of 81 stents, 62 (76.5%) were determined to be assessable. The metal artifact of the gold marker and motion artifact increased uninterpretability of the images of stents. Overall, 24 of 28 in-stent restenosis and 38 of 53 persistent restenosis were correctly detected by MDCT (85.7% and 71.7% sensitivity). In evaluable stents, 21 of 22 in-stent restenoses and 27 of 28 persistent restenosis were correctly detected (95.4% and 96.4% sensitivity). Additionally, as the grade of stenosis increases, the mean level of CT values in the stent lumina decreases linearly accordingly.

Conclusion

64-Slice MDCT has a high accuracy for the detection of significant in-stent or peristent restenosis of assessable stents in patients with peripheral artery stent implantation and therefore can be considered as a valuable noninvasive technique for stent surveillance.     

Evaluation of various image reconstruction parameters in lower extremity stents using multidetector-row CT angiography: initial findings

Image quality, visible lumen and patency of lower limb stents was assessed by multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) angiography using various reconstruction parameters and the results compared with conventional angiography. Fourteen patients (25 stents) were evaluated. From MDCT datasets, axial and coronal oblique reformations were reconstructed using differing reconstruction parameters (slice thickness, kernel, views). Artifacts and image quality were assessed using a five-degree scale (1=excellent, 5=poor). Visible stent diameter was measured. Stenosis severity was compared with calibrated catheter angiography. The image quality of medium and sharp image kernels were good/fair (1.9-2.4), while smooth kernel provided only acceptable/poor image quality (3.9-4.4). Coronal oblique images were rated superior to assess in-stent lumen rather than axial. Using medium and sharp kernels, the visible stent lumen was significantly greater than using smooth kernel (P<0.001). thirteen out of fourteen patients (24/25 stents) were correctly classified as patent. In one patient, in-stent stenosis (> or =50%) was falsely diagnosed using CT angiography (CTA) with smooth kernel and was, therefore, rated as false positive. Coronal oblique views, as well as medium and sharp kernels, have shown the best results regarding image quality to assess stent patency in the lower limb. Therefore, MDCT could be a valuable non-invasive modality for stent imaging in the peripheral vasculature.     

In-vitro evaluation of coronary stents and 64-detector-row computed tomography using a newly developed model of coronary artery stenosis

BACKGROUND: Stent implantation is the predominant therapy for non-surgical myocardial revascularization in patients with coronary artery disease. However, despite substantial advances in multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) coronary imaging, a reliable detection of coronary in-stent restenosis is currently not possible. PURPOSE: To examine the ability of 64-detector-row CT to detect and to grade in-stent stenosis in coronary stents using a newly developed ex-vivo vessel phantom with a realistic CT density pattern, artificial stenosis, and a thorax phantom. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four different stents (Liberté and Lunar ROX, Boston Scientific; Driver, Medtronic; Multi-Link Vision, Guidant) were examined. The stents were placed on a polymer tube with a diameter of 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, or 4.0 mm. Different degrees of stenosis (0%, 30%, 50%, 70-80%) were created inside the tube. For quantitative analysis, attenuation values were measured in the non-stenotic vessel outside the stent, in the non-stenotic vessel inside the stent, and in the stenotic area inside the stent. The grade of stenosis was visually assessed by two observers. RESULTS: All stents led to artificial reduction of attenuation, the least degree of which was found in the Liberté stent (11.3+/-10.2 HU) and the Multi-Link Vision stent (17.6+/-17.9 HU; P = 0.25). Overall, the non-stenotic vessel was correctly diagnosed in 55.5%, the low-grade stenosis in 58.3%, the intermediate stenosis in 63.8%, and the high-grade stenosis in 80.5%. In the 3.0-, 3.5-, and 4.0-mm vessels, in none of the cases was a non-stenotic or low-grade stenotic vessel misdiagnosed as intermediate or high-grade stenosis. The average deviation from the real grade of stenosis was 0.40 for the Liberté stent, 0.46 for the Lunar ROX stent, 0.45 for the Driver stent, and 0.58 for the Multi-Link Vision stent. CONCLUSION: Our ex-vivo data show that non-stenotic stents and low-grade in-stent stenosis can be reliably differentiated from intermediate and high-grade in-stent stenosis in vessels with a diameter of 3 to 4 mm. With regard to artifacts and the grading of stenoses, the Liberté stent was best suited for CT coronary angiography.     

Inductively coupled stent antennas in MRI.

The development of intimal hyperplasia following stent deployment can lead to narrowing or even occlusion of the stent lumen. The underlying mechanisms leading to neointimal proliferation within stents remain largely unknown. Long-term evaluation of stent patency requires a noninvasive means for assessing the stent lumen. MR angiography (MRA) has shown potential to provide noninvasive assessment of the vascular system. However, a detailed assessment of the stent lumen with MRI is often hampered by material-dependent susceptibility artifacts, as well as by radiofrequency (RF) eddy currents generated inside the electrically conducting stent mesh. In this study, stent prototypes were designed to act as active resonant structures at the Larmor frequency of the MR system. Employing the principle of inductive coupling, the B(1) fields of the stents were coupled to that of an outside surface coil. The stents thus acted as local RF signal amplifiers. Various stent designs were investigated regarding their coupling to an external coil, signal homogeneity, and suitability for mechanical expansion for implantation purposes. The dependency of flip angle amplification on the quality factor Q of the stents was systematically investigated. Phantom experiments revealed signal amplification in all stent prototypes. Signal enhancement inside and close to the surface of the stents enabled their localization with high contrast in MR images. In vivo imaging experiments in the iliac, renal, and splenic arteries of two pigs confirmed the in vitro findings. Wireless active visualization of stents allows for detailed analysis of the stent lumen with high contrast and spatial resolution. The proposed method could thus provide a powerful diagnostic means for the noninvasive long-term follow-up of stent patency, thereby enhancing our understanding of the mechanisms of restenosis.     

Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading

PURPOSE: To compare three-dimensional (3D) time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and rotational angiography for depiction of stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study had Ethics Committee approval, and each patient gave written informed consent. Forty-nine patients (18 women, mean age, 67.2 years +/- 9.1 [+/- standard deviation], and 31 men, mean age, 63.1 years +/- 8.0) with symptomatic stenosis of internal carotid artery (ICA) diagnosed at duplex ultrasonography underwent transverse 3D TOF MR angiography with sliding interleaved kY acquisition and coronal contrast-enhanced MR angiography, followed by DSA and rotational angiography within 48 hours. MR angiography was performed at 1.5-T with a cervical coil. Contrast-enhanced MR angiograms were obtained after a bolus injection of 20 mL of gadobenate dimeglumine. Maximum ICA stenosis on maximum intensity projection and source images was quantified according to NASCET criteria. Correlations for 3D TOF MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, DSA, and rotational angiography were determined by means of cross tabulation, and accuracy for detection and grading of stenoses were calculated. Data were evaluated with analysis of variance, Wilcoxon signed rank test, and McNemar test, all at significance of P < .05. RESULTS: Ninety-eight ICAs were evaluated at contrast-enhanced MR angiography, DSA, and rotational angiography, and 97 were evaluated at 3D TOF MR angiography. Correlations for contrast-enhanced MR angiography, 3D TOF MR angiography, and DSA relative to rotational angiography were r2 = 0.9332, r2 = 0.9048, and r2 = 0.9255, respectively. Lower correlation (r2 = 0.8593) was noted for contrast-enhanced MR angiography and DSA. Respective sensitivity and specificity for detection of hemodynamically relevant stenosis relative to rotational angiography were 100% and 90% for contrast-enhanced MR angiography, 95.5% and 87.2% for 3D TOF MR angiography, and 88.6% and 100% for DSA. Four of 31 severe stenoses were underestimated at DSA, and three were underestimated at contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Three severe stenoses were underestimated at 3D TOF MR angiography, and one was misclassified as occluded. Of 13 moderate (50%-69%) stenoses, one was overestimated at contrast-enhanced MR angiography, two were underestimated and three overestimated at 3D TOF MR angiography, and two were underestimated at DSA. CONCLUSION: DSA results in an underestimation of ICA stenosis compared with rotational angiography. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography correlates best with rotational angiography.     

Metallic renal artery MR imaging stent: artifact-free lumen visualization with projection and standard renal MR angiography

A cardiac-triggered free-breathing three-dimensional (3D) balanced fast field-echo projection renal magnetic resonance (MR) angiographic sequence was investigated for in-stent lumen visualization of a dedicated metallic renal artery stent. Fourteen prototype stents were deployed in the renal arteries of six pigs (in two pigs, three stents were deployed). Projection renal MR angiography was compared with standard contrast material-enhanced 3D breath-hold MR angiography. Artifact-free in-stent lumen visualization was achieved with both projection MR angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography. These promising results warrant further studies for visualization of in-stent restenosis.