Impact of highly purified urinary FSH and recombinant FSH on haemostasis: an open-label, randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND: It has recently been suggested that recombinant FSH administration may result in an increased risk of venous thrombosis. An open-label, randomized, controlled trial was carried out to compare the impact of urinary and recombinant FSH on haemostasis. METHODS: Fifty infertile women were randomized, using a random number generator on a personal computer, to receive either highly purified urinary FSH (u-hFSH) or recombinant human FSH (r-hFSH); a starting dose of 150 IU. Human chorionic gonadotrophin 10000 IU was administered once there was at least one follicle > or =18 mm. The luteal phase was supported with progesterone 50 mg/day for at least 15 days. Fifty normally menstruating women were recruited as controls. Repeated measurements of estradiol, progesterone, prothrombin time (PT) expressed as INR, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) ratio, fibrinogen (FBG), factor VIII (FVIII), normalized activated protein C ratio (nAPC ratio), antithrombin III activity (AT), protein C activity (PC), protein S activity (PS), tissue-type plasminogen activator antigen (t-PA), type 1 plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI), prothrombin fragments 1+2 (F1+2), were performed during both hyperstimulated and natural cycles, and at onset of the following menstruation or at 8 weeks of pregnancy. RESULTS: At the end of gonadotrophin administration PT INR increased in the u-hFSH group, while AT and t-PA significantly decreased. In the patients treated with r-hFSH, only F1+2 significantly decreased. No significant changes were observed in the control group. In the luteal phase FBG increased significantly in all groups. In the u-hFSH group no other significant changes were noted compared to pre-ovulatory values, while compared to baseline values AT, PS and t-PA significantly decreased. In the r-hFSH group during the luteal phase PT INR significantly decreased, but did not differ from baseline levels. Other parameters such as FBG, FVIII, t-PA, rose significantly, but only FVIII and FBG values were significantly higher than baseline levels. In the women who became pregnant a significant increase in t-PA and a significant decrease in PS at the midluteal phase were observed. After one month all the haemostatic parameters returned to baseline value if pregnancy failed to occur, while in the pregnant women a significant increase in FVIII and a significant decrease in PS were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH does not influence coagulation and fibrinolysis significantly, as already reported for urinary gonadotrophins. The moderate changes induced by both treatments are no longer detectable after 4 weeks.     

A double-blind, randomized study to compare recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (FSH; Gonal-F) with highly purified urinary FSH (Metrodin) HP) in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques including intracytoplasmic sperm injection. The French Multicentre Trialists

This prospective, double-blind, randomized, multicentre study compared the efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (r-hFSH; Gonal-F((R))) versus highly purified urinary FSH (u-hFSH HP; Metrodin((R)) HP) in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization, including intracytoplasmic sperm injection. A total of 278 patients began a long gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist protocol, then 139 received r-hFSH and 139 u-hFSH HP, 150 IU/day administered s.c., for the first 6 days of treatment. On day 7, the dose was adjusted, if necessary, according to ovarian response. Human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG, 10 000 IU, s.c.) was administered once there was more than one follicle 18 mm in diameter and two others >/=16 mm. Oocyte retrieval was performed 36-38 h after HCG injection: 128 patients (92%) receiving r-hFSH and 113 (81%) receiving u-hFSH HP had at least one oocyte retrieved. Among patients receiving r-hFSH, there was a significantly higher mean (+/- SD) number of oocytes retrieved (11.0 +/- 5.9 versus 8.8 +/- 4.8 with u-hFSH HP; P = 0. 002) and mean number of embryos obtained (5.1 +/- 3.7 versus 3.5 +/- 2.9 with u-hFSH HP; P = 0.0001). With r-hFSH, significantly fewer FSH treatment days (11.7 +/- 1.9 versus 14.5 +/- 3.3) and 75 IU ampoules (27.6 +/- 10.2 versus 40.7 +/- 13.6) were required than with u-hFSH HP (P = 0.0001). Embryo replacement on day 2-3 after oocyte retrieval resulted in 36 liveborn children in the Gonal-F((R)) group and 33 in the Metrodin HP((R)) group (not significant). There were seven cases (5.0%) of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in the r-hFSH group and three (2.2%), in the u-hFSH HP group (not significant). It is concluded that r-hFSH is more effective than u-hFSH in inducing multiple follicular development.     

Comparison of luteal phase profile in gonadotrophin stimulated cycles with or without a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to explore luteal phase hormone profiles in gonadotrophin-stimulated cycles with or without gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist therapy during intrauterine insemination (IUI). Forty-one infertile couples were recruited in this randomized clinical study. METHODS: The 19 patients included in group A were treated for 21 cycles with recombinant FSH 150 IU/day starting from day 3 of the cycle and with the GnRH antagonist cetrorelix at the dose of 0.25 mg/day starting from the day in which a follicle with a mean diameter of > or =14 mm was seen at ultrasound scan. Cetrorelix was administered until human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration. The 22 patients included in group B were administered recombinant FSH alone at the same dosage for 27 cycles. RESULTS: The two treatment groups showed a similar increase in progesterone concentration during the luteal phase. In the mid-luteal phase (day 6 after HCG), oestradiol concentrations in group B were significantly higher compared with group A (P < 0.05) but the oestradiol:progesterone ratio was similar in the two groups. Serum LH was completely suppressed during the follicular phase only in group A, concomitantly with GnRH antagonist administration. A total of six pregnancies, all ongoing, were achieved (14.3% per patient and 12.2% per cycle), equally distributed in group A and in group B. CONCLUSION: GnRH antagonists can be safely administered in gonadotrophin-stimulated IUI cycles without luteal phase supplementation because no deleterious effects of GnRH antagonist administration were noted on luteal progesterone concentration or on the duration of the luteal phase.     

A bolus of recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone at midcycle induces periovulatory events following multiple follicular development in macaques

The efficacy of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) as an alternative to luteinizing hormone (LH)/human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) for the initiation of periovulatory events in primate follicles is unknown. A single bolus of 2500 IU recombinant (r)-hFSH was compared to 1000 IU r- HCG for its ability to promote oocyte nuclear maturation and fertilization, granulosa cell luteinization and corpus luteum function following r-hFSH (60 IU/day) induction of multiple follicular development in rhesus monkeys. Following the r-hFSH bolus, bioactive luteinizing hormone concentrations were <3 ng/ml. Peak concentrations of serum FSH (1455+/-314 mIU/ml; mean+/-SEM) were attained 2-8 h after r-hFSH, and declined by 96 h. Bioactive HCG concentrations peaked between 2-8 h after r-HCG and remained > or = 100 ng/ml for >48 h, while immunoreactive FSH concentrations were at baseline. The proportion of oocytes resuming meiosis and undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) were comparable for r-hFSH (89%; 47+/-19%) and r- HCG (88%; 50+/-17%). In-vitro progesterone production and expression of progesterone receptors in granulosa cells did not differ between groups. Peak concentrations of serum progesterone in the luteal phase were similar, but were lower 6-9 days post-FSH relative to HCG. Thus, a bolus of r-hFSH was equivalent to r-HCG for the reinitiation of oocyte meiosis, fertilization and granulosa cell luteinization, but a midcycle FSH surge did not sustain normal luteal function in primates.      

Pituitary gonadotrophin secretory capacity during the luteal phase in superovulation using GnRH-agonists and HMG in a desensitization or flare-up protocol.

Pituitary gonadotrophin reserve and basal gonadotrophin secretion were tested during the luteal phase in women superovulated with buserelin/human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) in a desensitization (n = 17) or flare-up protocol (n = 7). In the desensitization protocol the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) stimulated serum LH and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrations remained impaired at least until day 14 after arrest of the agonist. In the flare-up protocol basal and stimulated LH secretion was still abnormal on days 14 and 15 after human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) injection. Normal basal serum FSH concentrations were measured at the end of the luteal phase in the flare-up protocol, but the response of FSH to LHRH injection was still subnormal. We conclude that gonadotrophin function remained impaired until the end of the luteal phase after desensitization and flare-up GnRH-agonist and HMG stimulation protocols. Corpus luteum stimulation with exogenous HCG or substitution therapy using natural progesterone are required to prevent the possible negative effects resulting from pituitary dysfunction after GnRH-agonist treatment.     

Recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (r-hFSH; Gonal-F) versus highly purified urinary FSH (Metrodin HP): results of a randomized comparative study in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques

A prospective, randomized, comparative, assessor-blind study was carried out in two centres to compare the efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (r-hFSH; Gonal-F) versus highly purified urinary FSH (u-hFSH HP; Metrodin HP), both administered s.c. in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization including intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). A total of 235 patients started a long gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist protocol: 119 received r-hFSH and 114 received u-hFSH HP (150 IU/day) for the first 6 days. Two patients were excluded from the study because they mistakenly received the incorrect treatment combination. Human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG; 10000 IU, s.c.) was administered once there was at least one follicle 18 mm in diameter and two others > or = 16 mm. In all, 119 (100%) and 102 (89%) of the patients respectively in the r-hFSH and u-hFSH HP groups achieved the criteria for HCG. The mean numbers (+/- SD) of oocytes recovered (the primary endpoint) were 12.2 +/- 5.5 and 7.6 +/- 4.4 in the r-hFSH and u-hFSH HP groups respectively (P < 0.0001). However, the number of FSH treatment days (11.0 +/- 1.6 versus 13.5 +/- 3.7) and the number of 75 IU ampoules (21.9 +/- 5.1 versus 31.9 +/- 13.4) used were significantly less (P < 0.0001) in the r-hFSH group than in the u-hFSH HP group. In patients treated using ICSI (63 patients in each group), no difference in oocyte maturation was observed. The mean numbers of embryos obtained were 8.1 +/- 4.2 and 4.7 +/- 3.5 (P < 0.0001), in favour of the r-hFSH group. In the majority of patients (96 and 99% respectively) only one or two embryos were replaced (mean 2.0 +/- 0.2 and 1.9 +/- 0.1 respectively) in the r- hFSH and u-hFSH HP groups. The clinical pregnancy rates per started cycle and per embryo transfer were 45 and 36%, and 48 and 47%, respectively in the r-hFSH and u-hFSH HP groups (not significant). There were six (5.1%) and two (1.7%) cases of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome respectively. In conclusion, it was found that r-hFSH was more effective than u-hFSH at inducing multiple follicular development. However, the high rate of low ovarian response in the u-hFSH group compared with our general experience was unexpected. The availability of a gonadotrophin with less inter-batch variation would be beneficial for clinicians. r-hFSH seems to fulfil such a requirement.      

Efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (Gonal-F) with urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin for induction of spermatogenesis and fertility in gonadotrophin-deficient men.

In order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) in combination with urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) to induce spermatogenesis and fertility in gonadotrophin-deficient men, we conducted a prospective, open, non-comparative multicentre study in two Australian academic medical centres. Ten men with gonadotrophin deficiency requiring induction of spermatogenesis and fertility were treated with HCG for 3-6 months followed by the s.c. self-administration of injections of r-hFSH in combination with HCG for 18 months. Among the eight men who commenced r-hFSH treatment, seven demonstrated sperm output at a median of 6 months and five achieved the target sperm output of 1. 5x10(6) per ml at a median of 9 months of FSH treatment. Mean testicular volume increased by 4.2 ml during FSH treatment. Three men produced pregnancies in their partners, two of which resulted in the birth of healthy babies and a third patient's partner had a miscarriage. We conclude that r-hFSH is well tolerated and effective in inducing testis growth, spermatogenesis and fertility in gonadotrophin-deficient men. The efficacy of r-hFSH seems comparable with urinary FSH at restoring normal fertility in gonadotrophin-deficient men.     

Low-dose exogenous FSH initiated during the early, mid or late follicular phase can induce multiple dominant follicle development

This prospective, randomized trial in normo-ovulatory women was designed to test whether administration of low-dose exogenous FSH initiated during the early, mid to late follicular phase can induce multiple dominant follicle development. Forty normal weight women (age 19-35 years, cycle length 25-32 days) participated. A fixed dose (75 IU/day) of recombinant FSH was started on either cycle day 3 (n = 13), 5 (n = 13) or 7 (n = 14) until the induction of ovulation with human chorionic gonadotrophin. Frequent transvaginal ultrasound scans and blood sampling were performed. Multifollicular growth occurred in all groups (overall in 60%), although day 7 starters showed less multifollicular growth. Age, cycle length and initial FSH and inhibin B concentrations were similar between subjects with single or multiple follicle development. However, for all women the lower the body mass index (BMI), the more follicles emerged (r = -0.44, P = 0.007). If multifollicular growth occurred, the length of the luteal phase was reduced (P = 0.002) and midluteal serum concentrations of LH (P = 0.03) and FSH (P = 0.004) were decreased and oestradiol (P = 0.002) and inhibin A (P = 0.01) were increased. In conclusion, interference with decremental serum FSH concentrations by administration of low dose FSH starting on cycle day 3, 5 or as late as day 7, is capable of disrupting single dominant follicle selection. The role of BMI in determining ovarian response suggests that differences in pharmacokinetics of exogenous FSH are involved. Multifollicular growth per se has a distinct effect on luteal phase characteristics. These observations may be relevant for the design of mild ovarian stimulation protocols.     

The use of recombinant human LH (lutropin alfa) in the late stimulation phase of assisted reproduction cycles: a double-blind, randomized, prospective study

BACKGROUND: The effect of recombinant human LH (r-hLH; lutropin alfa) in women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation with recombinant human FSH (r-hFSH) prior to IVF was investigated. METHODS: After down-regulation with the GnRH agonist, buserelin, 114 normo-ovulatory women (aged 18-37 years) received r-hFSH alone until the lead follicle reached a diameter of 14 mm. Patients were then randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive r-hFSH in addition to r-hLH, 75 IU s.c., or placebo daily for a maximum of 10 days prior to oocyte retrieval and IVF. The primary end-point was the number of metaphase II oocytes. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between treatment groups for the primary end-point. Serum estradiol concentrations on the day of HCG administration were significantly higher in the group receiving r-hLH plus r-hFSH than in the group receiving r-hFSH alone (P = 0.0001), but there were no significant differences between the groups in dose and duration of r-hFSH treatment required, oocyte maturation, fertilization rate, pregnancy rate and live birth rate. CONCLUSION: In this patient population, the addition of r-hLH during the late follicular phase of a long GnRH agonist and r-hFSH stimulation cycle provides no further benefit in terms of oocyte maturation or other end-points.     

Women with poor response to IVF have lowered circulating gonadotrophin surge-attenuating factor (GnSAF) bioactivity during spontaneous and stimulated cycles

BACKGROUND: Up to 13% of IVF cancellations are due to poor responses during down-regulated cycles. Because premature luteinization occurs more frequently in older or "poor responder" patients, defective production of gonadotrophin surge-attenuating factor (GnSAF) may be involved. METHODS: Nine women with normal previous IVF response (NORM) and 9 with previous poor IVF response (POOR) were monitored in a spontaneous cycle (blood samples: days 2, 7, 11, 15 and 20) and then stimulated with recombinant human FSH (rFSH) under GnRH agonist (blood samples: treatment days GnRH agonist + 2, GnRH agonist + 7, day of HCG administration and days HCG + 1 and HCG + 8). LH, FSH, estradiol, progesterone and inhibin-A and -B were assayed in individual samples while GnSAF bioactivity was determined in samples pooled according to day, cycle and IVF response. RESULTS: During spontaneous cycles LH, steroids and inhibins were similar between NORM and POOR women, FSH was elevated in POOR women (4.9 +/- 0.3 versus 6.7 +/- 0.6 mIU/l, P < 0.01) and GnSAF bioactivity was detectable on days 2, 7 and 11 in NORM women only. During IVF cycles inhibin-A and -B rose more markedly in NORM than POOR women. Similarly GnSAF production peaked on day GnRH agonist + 7 in NORM women, but on the day of HCG administration in POOR women. CONCLUSIONS: Defects in ovarian responsiveness to FSH include reduced GnSAF production. This suggests that GnSAF should be investigated as a marker of ovarian reserve once an immunoassay becomes available.     

The effect of gonadotrophins with differing LH/FSH ratios on the secretion of the various species of inhibin in women receiving IVF

We have measured secretory patterns of inhibin A, B, total alpha inhibin, pro-alphaC inhibin and oestradiol in women following pituitary suppression who were randomised into two groups to receive either urinary gonadotrophin (25:75 IU/ampoule of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH; Normegon; n = 11) or recombinant (r)FSH (75 IU/ampoule of FSH alone, n = 16). The women were of similar age (approximately 33 years) and length of infertility (approximately 4 years) and had a normal endocrine evaluation. Plasma FSH, LH, oestradiol, inhibin A, B, pro-alphaC and total alpha inhibin were measured by immunoassay prior to and following gonadotrophin stimulation. Immunoactive FSH, LH and oestradiol blood concentrations following pituitary down regulation were similar in the two groups being <2.0, <3.6 IU/l and <82 pmol/l respectively. The units of FSH given (2230 versus 2764 IU; Normegon versus rFSH), duration of treatment (9.1 versus 9.4 days) and number of follicles of > or =14mm on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration (17 versus 14) were also similar. Inhibin A or B concentrations rose similarly during Normegon or rFSH administration, peaking at days 9-11. Total alpha and pro-alphaC inhibin concentrations were lower (P < 0.05) in the rFSH group during days 10 and 11 of treatment being 18.9 +/- 15.9 ng/ml (Normegon) and 4.6 +/- 2.8 ng/ml (rFSH) for total alpha inhibin and 8.5 +/- 6.8 ng/ml (Normegon) and 2.8 +/- 1.6 ng/ml (rFSH) for pro-alphaC inhibin on day 10. Overall, higher total alpha inhibin concentrations were associated with more mature follicles and oocytes, greater fertilization rates and better quality embryos. We conclude that inhibin A and B secretion was similar in both groups and is primarily controlled by FSH, whereas total alpha inhibin and pro-alphaC increased preferentially in the Normegon group over the rFSH group, indicating that they are, in part, stimulated by LH.     

Serum follicle-stimulating hormone inhibition is a marker for preovulatory oocytes in in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer

A retrospective analysis was performed on 64 cycles stimulated with human menopausal gonadotrophin and/or pure follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and oestrogen (E2) levels. The increase in serum E2 on the day of HCG administration did not correlate (r = 0.05) with the number of preovulatory oocytes (preovs) or with an increase or decrease in serum FSH (r = 0.31). However, the change in serum FSH showed a significant correlation with the number of preovs (r = -0.95, P = 0.013). The probability of obtaining two or more preovs was relatively greater (1.47x) than that of other IVF patients, when there was a drop in FSH of 5% on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration.     

Pharmaco-dynamics of human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). The importance of the FSH concentration in initiating follicular growth in polycystic ovary-like disease

Using a randomized double-blind cross-over design, the pharmaco-dynamicand pharmaco-kinetic properties of ‘pure’ follicle-stimulatinghormone (FSH) (Metrodin) and human menopausal gonadotrophin(HMG) (Pergonal) were studied in 24 women with polycystic ovary-likedisease (PCOD) during induction of ovulation. Fifty-six cycleswere stimulated with FSH and 60 cycles with HMG, according toa standard protocol. Gonadotrophins were administered i.v. ina pulsatile fashion using pulse frequencies of either 30 or120 min. The cycles stimulated with either 30 or 120 min pulseintervals showed no differences among themselves. During thestimulation phase, the FSH and HMG stimulated cycles showedequal and dose dependent FSH concentrations (mean ± SD).The luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations (mean ± SD)were also equal but unchanged compared to the mean basal concentration.The LH, FSH, total urinary oestrogen excretion, and testosteroneprofiles (mean ± SD) obtained from cycle days –10to 0 as well as the pregnanediol profiles obtained from cycledays 0 to +14 showed no differences either. The occurrence ofan endogenous preovulatory LH surge was significantly more frequentin the cycles stimulated with a pulse interval of 30 min comparedto the cycles stimulated with a pulse interval of 120 min. Theaddition of LH as provided in HMG did not influence the FSHthreshold concentration above which initiation of folliculargrowth occurred, since no differences were found in the FSH‘stable’ concentrations between FSH and HMG stimulatedcycles. However, intra- and inter-individual variation in theFSH ‘stable’ concentration at which follicular growthwas initiated became obvious. It has been hypothesized thateither diminished circulating bioactive FSH or intrafollicularparacrine factors may influence the FSH threshold concentrationabove which the ovary responds with follicular growth.     

Endocrine responses to gonadotrophins after LHRH agonist administration on cycle days 1-4: prevention of premature luteinization

A treatment regime comprising an intranasally administered luteinizinghormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist analogue (buserelin)on cycle days 1–4, followed by gonadotrophin administration[follicle stimulating hormone (FSH)/human menopausal gonadotrophin(HMG)] resulted in identical oestradiol (E₂) responses comparedwith the reference method using clomiphene citrate (CC) andgonadotrophins. Immediately after analogue administration (day4), buserelin-treated women showed short-lived elevations inserum LH and progesterone concentrations, but in the later follicularphase, the serum LH concentration was lowered compared withthe controls. None of the women treated with analogue displayedelevated serum LH or progesterone concentrations at the timeof injection of human chorionic gonadotrophin. In the earlyluteal phase, these women had higher serum levels of progesteroneand higher progesterone to E2 ratios than the controls, butthe length of the luteal phase was slightly shortened. Hence,in hyperstimulated cycles, 4-day treatment with buserelin causedprofound endocrinological changes: namely, short-term rescueof the corpus luteum, prevention of an endogenous LH rise andpremature luteinization and increased progesterone productionin the early luteal phase     

A prospective randomized comparison of intramuscular or intravaginal natural progesterone as a luteal phase and early pregnancy supplement.

A luteal phase defect has been demonstrated in cycles stimulated using a protocol including a gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa). We have conducted a randomized prospective study of luteal and early pregnancy supplementation in 262 women selected for in-vitro fertilization (IVF), gamete intra-Fallopian transfer (GIFT) or zygote intra-Fallopian transfer (ZIFT). Either intramuscular progesterone in oil (50 mg/day) or intravaginal micronized progesterone (600 mg/day) was used as luteal supplement. In association with oestradiol valerate, progesterone administration was initiated from the day before oocyte retrieval until the 12th week of pregnancy. The implantation rate just failed to reach statistical significance (P = 0.07) in favour of the group receiving intravaginal progesterone. In the latter group, we observed a higher clinical pregnancy rate (33.6 versus 26.7%, not significant). Despite lower plasma progesterone levels, a lower first trimester abortion rate (P less than 0.05) was found in the intravaginally treated group. Intravaginal micronized progesterone was well tolerated by all patients and appeared more effective than intramuscular progesterone in improving the implantation rate, and in decreasing the incidence of abortions in stimulated cycles including GnRHa.     

Oestradiol plus progesterone treatment increases serum leptin concentrations in normal women

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have alluded to a role for both oestradiol and progesterone in the secretion of leptin from fat cells in the human, although direct evidence has yet to be obtained. The study aim was to assess serum leptin concentrations in normally cycling women receiving exogenous oestradiol and progesterone. METHODS: Normally cycling women were investigated in an untreated spontaneous cycle (control, n = 10), a cycle treated with oestradiol (oestradiol cycle, n = 10) and a cycle treated with oestradiol plus progesterone (oestradiol+progesterone cycle, n = 6). Oestradiol was given to the women through skin patches on cycle days 2, 3 and 4, and progesterone intravaginally on cycle days 3, 4 and 5. Serum concentrations of leptin, oestradiol, progesterone, FSH and LH were measured in daily blood samples. RESULTS: During the treatment, serum oestradiol and progesterone concentrations increased significantly. In the oestradiol cycles, leptin concentrations were not affected by treatment and did not differ from those in controls. In the oestradiol+progesterone cycles, leptin concentrations (mean +/- SEM) increased in all women from cycle day 3 (8.6 +/- 1.1 ng/ml) to days 5 (12.2 +/- 1.8 ng/ml, P < 0.01) and 6 (11.9 +/- 2.0, P < 0.05), and were at these points significantly higher than in the control cycles (P < 0.05). The mean percentage increase from day 3 to the peak concentration on days 5 or 6 was 62.6 +/- 6.8%. Leptin concentrations returned to the pretreatment value on day 7, together with the concentrations of oestradiol and progesterone. In the oestradiol+progesterone cycles, leptin concentrations correlated significantly with oestradiol and progesterone concentrations, but not with FSH and LH concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: These results show, for the first time, that leptin secretion can be stimulated in women by the administration of oestradiol plus progesterone. This may explain the increased concentrations of leptin during the luteal phase of the normal menstrual cycle.     

Differential effect of exogenous human chorionic gonadotrophin on progesterone production from normal or malfunctioning corpus luteum

To examine whether luteal phase defect is, in part, causally related to insufficient gonadotrophin stimulation, we compared the relation of the increment of serum progesterone concentrations in response to human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) with its basal level at mid-luteal phase. Thirty-eight naturally cycling infertile women aged between 27-41 years old were evaluated for hormonal responses to HCG injection at the mid- luteal phase. We measured luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), oestradiol and progesterone concentrations, before and 1, 2 and 3 h after the administration of HCG (5000 IU, i.m.) 7 days after ovulation verified by ultrasonography. Eleven out of 38 women exhibited progesterone concentrations below 10 ng/ml (low progesterone group), and those remaining showed progesterone concentrations of > or = 10 ng/ml (normal progesterone group). The basal LH, FSH and oestradiol concentrations were essentially the same in both groups. Progesterone concentrations rose significantly 1 h after the injection and levelled off thereafter. The increment of progesterone concentrations at 1 h in the normal progesterone group was 5.7 ng/ml on the average, whereas that in low progesterone group was 1.1 ng/ml. Furthermore, the percentage increase in progesterone concentrations at 1 h in the normal progesterone group was significantly greater than that in the low progesterone group. Both groups equally exhibited significant but marginal increases in oestradiol concentrations 1 h after the injection. LH and FSH concentrations at 3 h decreased significantly in both groups. In summary, HCG readily stimulates progesterone production in normally functioning corpus luteum whereas its stimulatory effect is minimal on malfunctioning corpus luteum. This suggests that luteal phase defect is not caused by inadequate gonadotrophin stimulation and, therefore, does not benefit from HCG administration.      

Endocrinology: Observations on the use of purified follicle-stimulating hormone in the treatment of luteal phase defects

We treated 18 infertile patients affected by histologicallyconfirmed luteal phase deficiency with 75 IU of purified follicle-stimulatinghormone (FSH) daily during the first 5 days of the cycle. Patientswho were not pregnant after the first cycle of treatment underwenta second cycle. In the second cycle the daily doses of purifiedFSH were doubled if luteal phase deficiency had persisted duringthe first cycle. During the two cycles before treatment andduring treatment, patients underwent an endometrial biopsy 1–3days before the expected onset of menses. An assessment of progesteroneserum concentrations was also performed on days 8, 6 and 4 beforethe expected onset of menses. Treatment was administered ina total of 33 cycles resulting in 30 ovulatory cycles. Six pregnancieswere achieved. Among non-conception ovulatory cycles, 13 presenteddelayed endometrial dating and 11 normal endometrium. The mean± SD of the sum of the three progesterone determinationswas 14.7 ± 1.4 ng/ml in pretreatment cycles, 14.6 ±1.6 ng/ml in cycles with normalization of endometrial dating,14.8 ± 1.7 ng/ml in cycles with persistence of lutealphase deficiency and 30.4 ± 3.0 ng/ml in conception cycles(P < 0.05 versus other groups). We conclude that purifiedFSH, if effective in the treatment of luteal phase deficiency,does not act through an increase in progesterone concentrations.     

The effect of luteal support with human chorionic gonadotrophin or progesterone on the daily progesterone profile after different types of ovarian stimulation.

Attempts have been made to increase the low pregnancy rate in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles by luteal phase support with progesterone or human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG). Previously, this practice has been inconsistent and the results unclear. The detailed effect of support on the progesterone profile in the luteal phase was assessed by daily salivary progesterone measurements in non-conception IVF cycles. The comparison of HCG and progesterone support in two different stimulation protocols showed that the profile of luteal progesterone concentrations was similar in control cycles and those supported with a vaginal progesterone suppository, showing an early decrease by the fourth luteal day. In cycles supported with multiple doses of HCG, the progesterone profile was normal but slightly increased up to the 9th luteal day subsequently falling to basal levels by the fourteenth luteal day.     

IVF/ICSI outcome and serum LH concentration on day 1 of ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH under pituitary suppression

BACKGROUND: Down-regulation with GnRH agonist has been suggested to result in a profound suppression of LH bioactivity, reduced estradiol synthesis, and thus impaired IVF and pregnancy outcome. The aims of this study were: (i) to assess the usefulness of serum LH measurement on stimulation day 1 as a predictor of ovarian response, conception and pregnancy outcome in patients treated with long-term down-regulation with GnRH agonist and recombinant FSH, and (ii) to define the best threshold LH value, if any, to discriminate between women with different outcomes of IVF. METHODS: Records of 2625 cycles in 1652 infertile women undergoing IVF (n = 1856) and/or ICSI (n = 769) treatment were reviewed. RESULTS: The range of LH concentrations on stimulation day 1 overlapped among non-conception cycles, conception cycles, ongoing pregnancies and early pregnancy losses. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that serum LH concentrations on stimulation day 1 were unable to discriminate between conception and non-conception cycles (AUC(ROC) = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.49-0.54) or ongoing pregnancies versus early pregnancy loss groups (AUC(ROC) = 0.52; 95% CI: 0.47-0.57). Stratification for various low serum levels of LH did not reveal significant differences with respect to conception or pregnancy outcome among different LH levels on stimulation day 1. CONCLUSIONS: Serum LH concentration on stimulation day 1 cannot predict ovarian response, conception and pregnancy outcome in women receiving long-term down-regulation during assisted reproduction treatment.