耻骨上区切口疝的腹腔镜修补体会

目的:总结腹腔镜修补耻骨上区切口疝的手术方法及效果。方法:回顾分析2011年2月至2012年3月收治的14例行腹腔镜耻骨上区切口疝修补术患者的临床资料,疝缺损下缘距耻骨联合均不超过5 cm,观察其临床疗效及并发症情况。结果:14例均成功完成腹腔镜切口疝修补术。手术时间63~125 min,平均(96.0±18.75)min。术后出现补片浅面血清肿2例,修补区域腹壁疼痛1例,无补片排异反应及肠梗阻、肠粘连等并发症发生。13例患者获得随访,随访19~26个月,平均(22.0±2.54)个月,无一例复发。结论:腹腔镜耻骨上切口疝修补术是安全、有效的,与其他部位切口疝相比,耻骨上区切口疝只要处置得当,腹腔镜修补术较开放手术更具优势。     

腹腔镜耻骨上疝修补56例临床疗效观察

目的 探讨腹腔镜耻骨上疝修补手术技术及临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析2008年6月至2014年6月中国人民解放军总医院第一附属医院普外科收治的56例耻骨上切口疝病人的临床资料。均游离膀胱腹膜瓣、关闭肌筋膜缺损、放置复合补片并行贯穿腹壁的缝合固定,采用螺旋钉固定耻骨联合后方、双侧Cooper韧带。结果 55例病人顺利完成腹腔镜修补手术,仅1例因盆腔致密粘连而中转开放手术。术中测量疝环面积为（30.3±12.5）cm2,所用复合补片面积为（96.7±28.3）cm2。手术时间（66.4±35.5）min,术后住院（4.5±1.5）d。围手术期发生并发症8例（14.3%）,其中膀胱破损1例,小肠浆肌层膜破损3例,术中腹壁下动脉损伤出血1例,均行腹腔镜手术处理;术后血清肿2例,慢性疼痛1例,均经保守治疗治愈。55例病人获得随访,随访时间（25.8±13.2）个月,仅1例病人复发。结论 腹腔镜耻骨上疝修补疗效良好。     

腹腔镜修补治疗耻骨上疝的经验

目的 探讨腹腔镜修补治疗耻骨上疝的合理性、安全性和有效性。方法 回顾性分析 2004年7月至2016年 12 月我科接受腹腔镜耻骨上疝修补术的90例病人临床资料,观察其临床疗效及并发症发生情况。结果 90例病人中89例完成腹腔镜耻骨上疝修补术,1例因严重粘连中转为开放Onlay修补。其中经腹腹膜前修补术（TAPP）7例,腹腔内补片修补术（IPOM）6例,经腹部分腹膜前修补术（TAPE）76例。疝缺损平均长径为(12.54±5.72)（2~30） cm,疝缺损平均面积为(92.98±62.09)（4~360） cm²。补片平均面积为(311.24±112.89)（80~600） cm²。平均手术时间为(54.04±16.60)（25~110） min。平均住院时间为(5.53±3.61)（1~33） d。术后使用镇痛药比例为8.99%（8/89）。术后复发4例,复发率为4.49%（4/89）。89例病人的中位随访时间为72（13~161）个月。结论 TAPP适用于治疗原发性耻骨上疝和腹膜较完整的小切口疝。TAPE是腹腔镜修补耻骨上疝的合理、安全且有效的术式。     

腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝补片修补的相关问题

腹部切口疝一直是外科剖腹手术后常见的并发症，在剖腹手术后的发生率为3％～13％，感染性伤口的切口疝发生率。切口疝早期的手术方法是行单纯缝合，术后复发率为20％～52％，复发率高的主要原因是修补后张力高。随后出现了人工编织物的无张力修补．术后复发率降至11％左右。但是由于要分离出一个容纳补片的间隙，所以必须对腹壁组织进行较大的解剖和分离．这就造成了大面积的腹壁组织损伤，也造成了术后病人比较剧烈的疼痛．     

耻骨上切口疝六例临床分析

耻骨上切口疝(incisional parapubic hernia)是一种少见的腹壁切口疝，诊断和治疗都与其他腹壁切口疝有所不同。2000年2月至2002年10月我院成功地治疗6例，现报告如下。     

腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝补片修补术的初步经验

目的:探讨腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术的手术方法、安全性等问题。方法:对我院2004年3月～11月间收治的25例腹壁切口疝病人,进行腹腔镜下修补术。结果:24例(96%)手术成功,1例(4%)因腹腔内广泛粘连而中转为剖腹修补。平均手术时间为110min,平均术后住院6d,6例(24%)病人术中发现有一个以上的隐匿性缺损。术后并发症有:术后短期内修补区腹壁明显疼痛21例(84%),腹壁缝合点较长时间疼痛6例(24%),浆液肿3例(12%);无修补区感染,也未发现早期复发的病例。结论:对腹壁切口疝,多数病人是可以经腹腔镜进行粘连松解及补片修补术的,还可在术中发现其他隐性缺损。对腹腔内广泛粘连而影响操作器械的进入及分离者,应及时中转剖腹手术。     

腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝补片修补术

腹壁切口疝是开腹手术后的常见并发症。使用补片的手术修补是主要的治疗方法。相对于开放的补片修补术,腹腔镜下补片修补术具有创伤小,不适症状轻,术后恢复快及住院时间短,复发率更低等优点,为越来越多的临床医师接受和应用。然而随着手术病例的增加,也逐渐显现了一些问题,诸如复发、慢性疼痛、肠损伤、血清肿的发生,一些特殊部位的切口疝如何修补等。     

腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术(附41例报告)

目的探讨腹腔镜下采用聚丙烯和膨化聚四氟乙烯复合补片（Bard Composix Mesh）修补腹壁切口疝的效果。方法2004年10月～2005年8月，对41例切口疝（腹壁缺损长径3～25cm，宽径3～18cm）腹腔镜下用超声刀进行腹腔内粘连松解和采用强生疝修补用缝合器行补片固定修补术。结果41例均顺利完成，无中转开腹。手术时间60～182min，平均85min。术后疼痛轻微，术后排便、排气时间25～41h，平均32h。术后第2天进食。术后住院5～7d，平均6d。41例随访6～16个月，平均9个月，未见切口疝复发。结论腹腔镜下采用复合补片修补腹壁切口疝是一种安全、有效的方法，值得临床推广应用。     

腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术

目的探讨腹腔镜下应用补片行腹壁切口疝修补术的方法、安全性及临床效果。方法2004年9月至2007年6月对56例切口疝（腹壁缺损长径7～19cm,宽径4～12cm）的患者行腹腔镜下应用补片行切口疝修补术。结果55例腹腔镜下行腹腔粘连松解和补片固定,顺利完成切口疝修补手术,1例因肠管与腹壁粘连紧密而中转开腹修补术。手术时间60～135min,平均92min。肠功能恢复早,术后排便、排气时间平均为31h,术后住院5～7d。术后并发症：术后疼痛达3个月以上者有9例,浆液肿8例。无手术死亡和肠瘘发生。随访16～28个月,平均19个月,未见切口疝复发。结论腹腔镜下行腹腔内粘连松解、采用缝合器和缝线贯穿腹壁固定补片来修补腹壁切口疝是一种安全、有效的微创方法,值得临床推广应用。     

Female Gender and Diabetes Mellitus Increase the Risk of Recurrence after Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair

Background

Laparoscopic hernia repair is used widely for the repair of incisional hernias. Few case studies have focussed on purely ‘incisional’ hernias. This multicentre series represents a collaborative effort and employed statistical analyses to provide insight into the factors predisposing to recurrence of incisional hernia after laparoscopic repair. A specific hypothesis (ie, laterality of hernias as well as proximity to the xyphoid process and pubic symphysis predisposes to recurrence) was also tested.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of all laparoscopic incisional hernias undertaken in six centres from 1 January 2004 to 31 December 2010. It comprised a comprehensive review of case notes and a follow-up using a structured telephone questionnaire. Patient demographics, previous medical/surgical history, surgical procedure, postoperative recovery, and perceived effect on quality of life were recorded. Repairs undertaken for primary ventral hernias were excluded. A logistic regression analysis was then fitted with recurrence as the primary outcome.

Results

A total of 186 cases (91 females) were identified. Median follow-up was 42 months. Telephone interviews were answered by 115/186 (62%) of subjects. Logistic regression analyses suggested that only female sex (odds ratio (OR) 3.53; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.39–8.97) and diabetes mellitus (3.54; 1–12.56) significantly increased the risk of recurrence. Position of the defect had no statistical effect.

Conclusions

These data suggest an increased risk of recurrence after laparoscopic incisional hernia repair in females and subjects with diabetes mellitus. These data will help inform surgeons and patients when considering laparoscopic management of incisional hernias. We recommend a centrally hosted, prospectively maintained national/international database to carry out additional research.     

腹壁切口疝补片修补术后复发的再手术治疗

目的总结腹壁切口疝补片修补术后复发再次手术治疗的经验。方法回顾性分析我院2007年1月至2010年12月期间收治的16例腹壁切口疝补片修补术后复发再次手术患者的资料。结果所有患者均再次采用补片进行修补,其中13例除去旧补片置入新补片修补,2例新补片与原补片重叠并扩大范围修补,1例在原补片上直接重叠新补片修补。术后所有患者切口均Ⅰ期愈合,3例发生补片上方积液,经穿刺加压后治愈。术后住院时间7～16 d,平均9 d。术后引流管拔除时间2～7 d,平均4 d。所有患者均获随访,随访时间5～36个月,平均20个月,1例有轻微腹壁异物感,无修补区慢性疼痛,无疝复发。结论补片修补术后复发性切口疝再次手术时需综合考虑复发疝的位置以及既往选用的补片类型和修补方法,再次手术需选用合适的补片及修补方法方可取得满意效果。     

小切口辅助腹腔镜巨大腹壁切口疝修补术的探讨

目的总结小切口辅助腹腔镜巨大切口疝修补术的经验。方法 2008年6月-2009年12月,采用小切口辅助腹腔镜修补巨大切口疝15例,疝环（12.3±3.4）cm,采用小切口切除疝囊并进行腹壁塑形。结果 15例均顺利完成手术,手术时间100-150 min,（123.3±15.9）min。小切口长度5-8 cm,（6.0±0.9）cm。术中发现隐匿疝6例,一并予以修补。浆液肿1例。术后住院时间4-8 d,（5.3±1.2）d。1例术后疼痛持续〉3个月,无切口感染和肠道及腹腔脏器损伤。全组随访12-30个月,（19.9±4.7）月,无复发。结论小切口辅助腹腔镜修补巨大切口疝是一种安全可靠的手术方法,术后并发症少,达到了腹壁塑形的效果。     

Current Trends in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair

Background and Objectives:

The purpose of this study was to analyze the surgical technique, postoperative complications, and possible recurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) in comparison with open ventral hernia repair (OVHR), based on the international literature.

Database:

A Medline search of the current English literature was performed using the terms laparoscopic ventral hernia repair and incisional hernia repair.

Conclusions:

LVHR is a safe alternative to the open method, with the main advantages being minimal postoperative pain, shorter recovery, and decreased wound and mesh infections. Incidental enterotomy can be avoided by using a meticulous technique and sharp dissection to avoid thermal injury.     

Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair With Fibrin Glue in Select Patients

Background and Objective:

Laparoscopic treatment of incisional hernias can be performed using different types of fixation devices and prosthesis. We present a case series of 19 patients with incisional hernias with a diameter of <6cm, who underwent laparoscopic repair using Hi-tex dual-side mesh, positioned intraperitoneally, fixed to the abdominal wall by fibrin glue (Tissucol).

Methods:

Nineteen patients with incisional hernias <6cm in diameter were enrolled in this study and treated laparoscopically with Hi-tex and Tissucol. Surgical complications and patient outcomes were assessed with a clinical follow-up.

Results:

Laparoscopic repair of incisional hernias by using Hi-tex mesh affixed to the parietal wall with fibrin glue was feasible and easy in patients with parietal defects <6cm in diameter. Mean operating time was 30 minutes. Mean hospital stay was 1.5 days. Almost no postoperative pain, major surgical complications, seroma formation, relapses, or prosthesis infection occurred during a mean follow-up of 20 months.

Conclusions:

In select patients, Hi-tex mesh affixed using fibrin glue allows laparoscopic repair of incisional hernias with very good patient outcomes, especially in terms of postoperative pain and seroma formation.     

Evaluation of the Rebound Hernia Repair Device for Laparoscopic Hernia Repair

Background:

The characteristics of the ideal type of mesh are still being debated. Mesh shrinkage and fixation have been associated with complications. Avoiding shrinkage and fixation would improve hernia recurrence rates and complications. To our knowledge, this is the first study of a device with a self-expanding frame for laparoscopic hernia repair.

Methods:

Six Rebound Hernia Repair Devices were placed laparoscopically in pigs. This device is a condensed polypropylene, super-thin, lightweight, macro-porous mesh with a self-expanding Nitinol frame. The devices were assessed for adhesions, shrinkage, and histological examination. Laboratory and radiologic evaluations were also performed.

Results:

The handling properties of the devices facilitated their laparoscopic placement. They were easily identified with simple x-rays. The mesh was firmly integrated within the surrounding tissue. One device was associated with 3 small adhesions. The other 5 HRDs had no adhesions. We noted no shrinkage or folding. All devices preserved their original size and shape.

Conclusions:

At this evaluation stage, we found that the Rebound Hernia Repair Device may serve for laparoscopic hernia repair and has favorable handling properties. It prevents folding and shrinkage of the mesh. It may eliminate the need for fixation, thus preventing chronic pain. The Nitinol frame also allowed radiologic evaluation for gross movement. Further studies will be needed to evaluate its clinical application.     

腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术20例

目的 探讨腹腔镜治疗腹壁切口疝的安全性及有效性.方法 回顾性分析2009年6月至2011年9月20例腹壁切口疝患者的资料.其中男14例,女6例,年龄26 ～ 76岁,平均57.3岁.距离上次手术时间间隔为4～26个月,平均7个月.腹正中切口13例,侧腹部切口7例.有2例为缝合修补术后复发病例.结果 所有患者均采用复合补片进行修补,腹壁缺损大小4cmx5cm～ 10cm×13 cm.手术时间40～ 170 min,平均100 min.术后所有患者切口Ⅰ期愈合,术后补片上方疝囊内积液5例,经局部穿刺抽吸并加压包扎后治愈.术后修补区域腹壁疼痛1例,给予口服美洛昔康片对症处理,于术后3个月内逐渐消失.术后住院时间4～13d,平均7d.18例患者获得随访,随访6～30个月,平均15个月,1例复发.结论 腹腔镜下复合补片修补腹壁切口疝具有损伤小、术后疼痛轻、并发症少、恢复快等优点,值得推广.     

腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补手术难点及操作技巧

目的探讨腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术（totally extraperitoneal,TEP）难点及操作技巧。方法2006年5月～2010年5月,施行257例腹腔镜疝修补手术,对术中遇到的操作难点及手术技巧进行总结分析。结果254例行TEP,3例因腹膜破裂中转为经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术（transabdominalpreperitoneal,TAPP）。术后5例出现阴囊血肿,经非手术治愈;1例出现疝囊残端血肿,手术行血肿清除及残留疝囊切除。257例随访时间6～51个月,平均28个月,其中3例（1.2％）分别于术后6、14、23个月出现对侧疝,再次行TEP;2例分别于术后20、60d复发,行二次开放无张力疝修补手术;1例7个月后出现疝钉处疼痛,局麻取出疝钉后痛疼消失,其余患者均无异常。结论TEP的技术关键点主要是腹膜前间隙的建立、镜下解剖标志的应用、正确的疝囊分离方法、补片放置及固定和隐匿疝的恰当处理。     

Comparison of Prosthetic Materials in Incisional Hernia Repair

Purpose Incisional hernias are not uncommon after abdominal surgery, but their repair is associated with a high risk of complications, including adhesions and recurrence. Many different types of meshes and adhesion barriers have been developed in an attempt to overcome these problems, some of which we have assessed in a rat model.Methods We made a full-thickness 1.5 × 2.5-cm abdominal wall defect in 30 Sprague-Dawley rats, which were divided into three groups according to the materials used for repair: 2 × 3-cm polypropylene mesh (group 1); expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) with double-layer polypropylene mesh (group 2); or polypropylene mesh with oxidized cellulose adhesion barriers (group 3). We assessed adhesion formation, tensile strength, and histopathologic findings.Results The mean adhesion scores were 3.3, 1.3, and 0.7, in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P < 0.001). The area involved by adhesions was significantly greater in group 1 than in groups 2 or 3 (P < 0.01, P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between groups 2 and 3 (P < 0.05). The tensile strength in group 2 was less than that in groups 1 or 3 (P < 0.01, P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between groups 1 and 3 (P > 0.05).Conclusion Although there was less adhesion formation with PTFE and oxidized cellulose, PTFE not only impaired the tensile strength, but also induced fibrosis and inflammation. An oxidized cellulose adhesion barrier can be safely used in incisional hernia repair to prevent intra-abdominal adhesions.