腹壁切口疝网片无张力修补术

目的 评估腹壁切口疝无张力修补术。方法 回顾分析15例腹壁切口疝用聚丙烯网片修补。网片用单丝不吸收缝线连续缝合固定在缺损边缘，网片必须超过缺损边缘2cm。常规术前预防性用单剂抗生素。结果 随访15－38个月无一例复发。结论 腹壁切口疝用聚丙烯网片无张力修补是一安全简单方法且术后疼痛轻微。     

腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术

目的探讨腹腔镜下应用补片行腹壁切口疝修补术的方法、安全性及临床效果。方法2004年9月至2007年6月对56例切口疝（腹壁缺损长径7～19cm,宽径4～12cm）的患者行腹腔镜下应用补片行切口疝修补术。结果55例腹腔镜下行腹腔粘连松解和补片固定,顺利完成切口疝修补手术,1例因肠管与腹壁粘连紧密而中转开腹修补术。手术时间60～135min,平均92min。肠功能恢复早,术后排便、排气时间平均为31h,术后住院5～7d。术后并发症：术后疼痛达3个月以上者有9例,浆液肿8例。无手术死亡和肠瘘发生。随访16～28个月,平均19个月,未见切口疝复发。结论腹腔镜下行腹腔内粘连松解、采用缝合器和缝线贯穿腹壁固定补片来修补腹壁切口疝是一种安全、有效的微创方法,值得临床推广应用。     

耻骨上区切口疝的腹腔镜修补体会

目的:总结腹腔镜修补耻骨上区切口疝的手术方法及效果。方法:回顾分析2011年2月至2012年3月收治的14例行腹腔镜耻骨上区切口疝修补术患者的临床资料,疝缺损下缘距耻骨联合均不超过5 cm,观察其临床疗效及并发症情况。结果:14例均成功完成腹腔镜切口疝修补术。手术时间63~125 min,平均(96.0±18.75)min。术后出现补片浅面血清肿2例,修补区域腹壁疼痛1例,无补片排异反应及肠梗阻、肠粘连等并发症发生。13例患者获得随访,随访19~26个月,平均(22.0±2.54)个月,无一例复发。结论:腹腔镜耻骨上切口疝修补术是安全、有效的,与其他部位切口疝相比,耻骨上区切口疝只要处置得当,腹腔镜修补术较开放手术更具优势。     

改良Stoppa技术修补巨大腹壁切口疝和缺损(31例报告)

目的总结应用改良的Stoppa技术修补腹壁巨大切口疝和缺损的经验。方法31例腹壁巨大切口疝，腹壁缺损平均直径14．7cm。将聚丙烯网片或复合补片置入腹肌后筋膜前间隙修补，但对缺损边缘不强行拉拢缝合。结果术后无一例发生皮下积液及切口感染。30例患者获得随访，随访时间2～36个月，平均25个月，无一例复发。结论改良的Stoppa技术是无张力修补巨大腹壁切口疝和缺损安全和合理的方法。     

腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前修补术治疗耻骨上切口疝的临床观察

目的:探讨改良经腹腹膜前补片置入技术在腹腔镜耻骨上切口疝修补术中的应用效果及安全性、可靠性。方法:回顾分析2015年1月至2019年1月收治的36例耻骨上切口疝患者的临床资料,其中1例合并右侧腹股沟疝。结果:36例均完成腹腔镜下耻骨上切口疝修补术,35例经腹腹膜前补片置入术修补耻骨上切口疝,游离腹膜前间隙至耻骨弓下方2 cm,全层关闭腹壁缺损,放置补片,连续缝合关闭腹膜;1例加行腹腔镜右侧腹股沟疝无张力修补术。1例患者因游离腹膜瓣破损无法覆盖补片,改行部分腹膜前补片修补术,无一例中转开腹。腹壁缺损3.0～11.0 cm,平均(8.5±1.0)cm;手术时间60～130 min,平均(90±15)min。术区血清肿3例,1个月后自行吸收;术后慢性疼痛2例,未特殊处理2周后逐渐缓解;无肠梗阻、补片排异反应等其他并发症发生。术后随访9～45个月,无一例复发。结论:经腹腹膜前补片置入技术应用于腹腔镜耻骨上切口疝修补术中安全、可靠,可降低医疗成本,值得推广。     

腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术(附41例报告)

目的探讨腹腔镜下采用聚丙烯和膨化聚四氟乙烯复合补片（Bard Composix Mesh）修补腹壁切口疝的效果。方法2004年10月～2005年8月，对41例切口疝（腹壁缺损长径3～25cm，宽径3～18cm）腹腔镜下用超声刀进行腹腔内粘连松解和采用强生疝修补用缝合器行补片固定修补术。结果41例均顺利完成，无中转开腹。手术时间60～182min，平均85min。术后疼痛轻微，术后排便、排气时间25～41h，平均32h。术后第2天进食。术后住院5～7d，平均6d。41例随访6～16个月，平均9个月，未见切口疝复发。结论腹腔镜下采用复合补片修补腹壁切口疝是一种安全、有效的方法，值得临床推广应用。     

老年腹壁切口疝的腹腔镜下修补术

目的 探讨腹腔镜下应用补片行老年腹壁切口疝修补术的方法、安全性及临床效果。方法 2004年11月至2006年6月对17例老年切口疝患者行腹腔镜下应用补片切口疝修补术。结果 16例腹腔镜下行腹腔粘连松解和补片固定,顺利完成切口疝修补手术,1例因肠管与腹壁粘连紧密而中转开腹修补术。手术时间65～132min,平均95min。术后恢复排便、排气时间平均为31h,术后住院5～7d。术后并发症：疼痛3个月以上者3例,浆液肿5例,穿刺口感染1例,均经保守治疗后好转,无手术死亡和肠瘘发生。随访7～26个月（平均13个月）,未见切口疝复发。结论 腹腔镜下行腹腔内粘连松解,采用缝合器和缝线贯穿腹壁固定补片修补老年腹壁切口疝安全、有效。     

腹腔镜下腹壁巨大切口疝修补术的临床应用

目的探讨腹腔镜下应用补片修补巨大腹壁切口疝的手术方法及临床效果。方法分析25例应用腹腔镜下补片修补腹壁巨大切口疝(腹壁缺损长径为12~25cm,宽9~18cm,缺损面积108~451cm2)患者的临床资料。结果21例(84.0%)顺利完成腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术,4例(16.0%)因肠管与腹壁粘连紧密而中转开腹。手术时间78~186(平均95)min。术后住院5~8d,平均6.5d。术后疼痛达3个月以上8例(32.0%),经治疗后缓解;浆液肿9例(36%)。无切口感染和肠瘘发生;无手术死亡。全组患者随访6~25(平均11)个月,无切口疝复发。结论腹腔镜下修补腹壁巨大切口疝是一种安全、有效的方法,对腹腔粘连重分离困难者应及时中转开腹。     

腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术15例

目的探讨腹腔镜下应用补片行腹壁切口疝修补术的方法、安全性及临床疗效。方法2008年5月至2009年5月,对15例腹壁切口疝进行腹腔镜下补片修补术。结果14例腹腔镜下行腹腔粘连松解和补片固定,顺利完成切口疝修补手术;1例因肠管与腹壁及疝环致密粘连而中转开放切口疝修补术。术后腹壁修补区域疼痛10例(71.4%),疝环和补片间出现浆液肿4例(28.6%),无肠瘘和死亡病例,未发生手术相关的感染。术后随访3～12个月,平均7.5个月,未见复发。结论在腹腔镜下行腹腔粘连松解,采用疝钉合器与缝线贯穿腹壁全层固定补片可以修补大多数腹壁切口疝,同时还可以发现其他的隐匿性疝,是一种安全、有效的微创手术方法,值得临床推广。     

腹腔镜耻骨上疝修补56例临床疗效观察

目的 探讨腹腔镜耻骨上疝修补手术技术及临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析2008年6月至2014年6月中国人民解放军总医院第一附属医院普外科收治的56例耻骨上切口疝病人的临床资料。均游离膀胱腹膜瓣、关闭肌筋膜缺损、放置复合补片并行贯穿腹壁的缝合固定,采用螺旋钉固定耻骨联合后方、双侧Cooper韧带。结果 55例病人顺利完成腹腔镜修补手术,仅1例因盆腔致密粘连而中转开放手术。术中测量疝环面积为（30.3±12.5）cm2,所用复合补片面积为（96.7±28.3）cm2。手术时间（66.4±35.5）min,术后住院（4.5±1.5）d。围手术期发生并发症8例（14.3%）,其中膀胱破损1例,小肠浆肌层膜破损3例,术中腹壁下动脉损伤出血1例,均行腹腔镜手术处理;术后血清肿2例,慢性疼痛1例,均经保守治疗治愈。55例病人获得随访,随访时间（25.8±13.2）个月,仅1例病人复发。结论 腹腔镜耻骨上疝修补疗效良好。     

Laparoscopic repair of suprapubic incisional hernias: suturing and intraperitoneal composite mesh onlay. A retrospective study

BACKGROUND: Suprapubic hernias are those defects located 4 cm from the pubic symphysis. Our aim is to highlight the laparoscopic repair of suprapubic incisional hernias. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 17 patients with suprapubic incisional hernias from 1999 to 2007. A modified technique of laparoscopic intraperitoneal composite mesh onlay was performed for these patients. RESULTS: There were 12 females and 5 males with a mean age of 55.9 years and a mean BMI of 30 kg/m(2). The mean hernia size was 87.5 cm(2), with an average mesh size of 234 cm(2). Mean follow-up was 9 months. Complications were seen in five patients, with an overall recurrence rate of 5.8%. DISCUSSION: Suprapubic hernias are difficult to manage because of the complexity of dissection and their anatomic proximity to bony, vascular and nerve structures. The lower end of the mesh should be fixed to the Cooper's ligament and the pubic bone. Laparoscopic repair of these uncommon hernias is safe, effective and provides all the benefits of minimally invasive surgery.     

腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术20例

目的 探讨腹腔镜治疗腹壁切口疝的安全性及有效性.方法 回顾性分析2009年6月至2011年9月20例腹壁切口疝患者的资料.其中男14例,女6例,年龄26 ～ 76岁,平均57.3岁.距离上次手术时间间隔为4～26个月,平均7个月.腹正中切口13例,侧腹部切口7例.有2例为缝合修补术后复发病例.结果 所有患者均采用复合补片进行修补,腹壁缺损大小4cmx5cm～ 10cm×13 cm.手术时间40～ 170 min,平均100 min.术后所有患者切口Ⅰ期愈合,术后补片上方疝囊内积液5例,经局部穿刺抽吸并加压包扎后治愈.术后修补区域腹壁疼痛1例,给予口服美洛昔康片对症处理,于术后3个月内逐渐消失.术后住院时间4～13d,平均7d.18例患者获得随访,随访6～30个月,平均15个月,1例复发.结论 腹腔镜下复合补片修补腹壁切口疝具有损伤小、术后疼痛轻、并发症少、恢复快等优点,值得推广.     

Application of the novel enhanced transabdominal preperitoneal (ETAP) technique for laparoscopic suprapubic incisional hernia repair

Suprapubic incisional hernia is a special type of incisional hernia, the optimal choice of surgery for which remains controversial. Inspired by advantages of laparoscopic incisional hernia repair and inguinal hernia repair, we developed a novel laparoscopic surgery procedure for suprapubic incisional hernia repair: the enhanced transabdominal preperitoneal (ETAP) technique. To create a peritoneal flap, the peritoneum was dissected from 2 cm above the abdominal wall defect to 2 cm below the pubic arch, then the hernia defect was closed with a full-thickness transabdominal suture. Following the position of mesh to cover the defect with an 5-cm overlap on all sides, the peritoneal flap was closed with continuous suture. In this study, a total of 57 patients with suprapubic incisional hernia underwent laparoscopic ETAP. The mean hernia size was 61.5 cm2, the average mesh size was 173.6 cm2, the mean operating time was 90 min, the mean blood loss was 34 cc, and the average hospital stay was 2.6 days. In the follow-up period, which ranged from 12 to 45 months, the overall incidence of complications was 17.86%. Six patients developed seroma without herniation, six patients suffered from obvious postoperative pain, and four patients experienced urinary retention. All complications resolved without treatment. No recurrence was observed. In conclusion, the laparoscopic ETAP technique contributes to reduced rates of suprapubic incisional hernia repair and mesh-induced complications.     

Laparoscopic ePTFE mesh repair of incisional and ventral hernias

Incisional hernia is a relatively frequent complication of abdominal surgery. The use of mesh to repair incisional and ventral hernias results in lower recurrence rates compared with primary suture techniques. The laparoscopic approach may be associated with lower postoperative morbidity compared with open procedures. Long-term recurrence rates after laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernias are not well defined. A prospective study of the initial experience of a standardized technique of laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair carried out in a tertiary referral hospital was undertaken between January 2003 and February 2007. Laparoscopic hernia repair was attempted in 71 patients and was successful in 68 (conversion rate 4%). The mean age of the patients identified was 63.1 years (39 men and 31 women). Multiple hernial defects were identified in 38 patients (56%), and the mean overall size of the fascial defects was 166 cm(2). The mean mesh size used was 403 cm(2). The mean operative time was 121 minutes. There were six (9%) major complications in this series, but there were no deaths. Hernia recurrence was noted in four patients (6%) at a mean follow up of 20 months. Our preliminary experience indicates that laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair is technically feasible and has acceptable postoperative morbidity and low early recurrence rates.     

比较腹腔镜腹腔内与开放腹膜前间隙补片置入术治疗腹壁切口疝的效果

目的比较腹腔镜腹腔内补片置入术(IPOM)与开放腹膜前间隙补片置入术(Sublay)治疗腹壁切口疝的效果。方法选取2016-01—2019-01间在郑州大学第一附属医院接受疝修补术治疗的76例腹壁切口疝患者,将36例行腹腔镜IPOM术的患者作为腔镜组。将40例行开放Sublay术的患者作为开放组。回顾性分析患者的临床资料。结果2组患者均成功完成手术。2组手术时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。腔镜组术中出血量、术后肠蠕动恢复时间及住院时间均少于开放组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。腔镜组术后近期疼痛发生率低于开放组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),其余并发症差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论腹腔镜IPOM术具有创伤小、恢复快、疼痛轻、出血少、并发症少等优点,具有更广阔的应用前景。     

Bard Composix补片修补巨大切口疝临床应用

目的 总结应用Bard Composix补片修补4例巨大切口疝的临床经验。方法 使用美国巴德公司的Composix补片对4例巨大腹壁切口疝进行修补术治疗。结果 4例病人均无并发症,随访1～11个月无复发。结论 Composix补片修补巨大切口疝具有安全、创伤小、恢复快的优点,是治疗切口疝的理想术式。     

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair using a two (5-mm) port technique.

OBJECTIVE: High recurrence rates have been documented after primary repair of incisional hernias. Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repairs have been performed with very low rates of recurrence. We have modified the standard technique of laparoscopic repair in patients with small incisional and ventral hernias. The purpose of this study was to document the technique utilizing only two 5-mm ports and demonstrate that it is safe, effective, and feasible. METHODS: Three patients with small incisional or ventral hernias were examined. The standard laparoscopic ventral hernia repair technique was modified as follows: two 5-mm ports were inserted on opposite sides of the defect. The defects ranged from 2.5 cm to 4 cm in size. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh (DualMesh, WL Gore, Flagstaff, AZ) was used to cover the hernia defect, overlapping the defect margins circumferentially by 3 cm. The mesh diameter ranged from 8.5 cm to 10 cm. The mesh was inserted through a 5-mm skin incision site and affixed into position with transfascial sutures and spiral tacks. RESULTS: The operative time ranged from 53 minutes to 57 minutes. All patients were discharged home the day of surgery and reported minimal postoperative pain. Follow-up ranged from 6 months to 1 year; all patients were doing well without recurrence. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic repair of ventral or incisional hernias can be performed using only two 5-mm ports. This technique can be done on an outpatient basis in a safe, timely fashion.     

Laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair: A more effective alternative to conventional repair of recurrent incisional hernia

Conventional repair of recurrent ventral incisional hernia is associated with a higher recurrence rate (30%-50%) than repair of primary incisional hernia (11%-20%). Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair (LIHR) can significantly reduce the recurrence rate of primary hernia to less than 5%. In this study, we evaluate the efficacy of repairing recurrent incisional hernia laparoscopically. One-hundred and seventy consecutive patients undergoing LIHR between January 1995 and December 2002 were prospectively reviewed. Patients with recurrent incisional hernia (n = 69) were compared to patients with primary incisional hernia (n = 101). Patient demographics and perioperative and postoperative data were recorded prospectively. Follow-up was obtained from office visits and telephone interviews. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t test and the x ²test. Results are expressed as means ± standard deviation. The patients with recurrent incisional hernia had a mean of 1.9 ± 1.3 previous repairs, higher body mass index (BMI) (34 ± 6 kg/m² vs. 33 ± 8 kg/m², P = 0.46), larger defect size (123 ± 115 cm² vs. 101 ± 108 cm², P = 0.06), and longer operative time (119 ± 61 minutes vs. 109 ± 44 minutes, P= 0.11). The complication rate was higher in the recurrent group (28% vs. 11%, P = 0.01), but the recurrence rate was not different (7% vs. 5%, P= 0.53). The mean time to recurrence was significantly shorter in the recurrent group (3 ± 2 months vs. 14 ± 7 months, P < 0.0001). The mean follow-up interval was 19 ± 18 months in the recurrent group and 27 ± 20 months in the primary group. Although laparoscopic repair of recurrent incisional hernia resulted in a higher recurrence and complication rate than laparoscopic repair of primary incisional hernia, the rates were lower than those reported for conventional repair of recurrent incisional hernia. Laparoscopic repair of recurrent incisional hernia is an effective alternative to conventional repair. Supported in part by Tyco/US Surgical Corporation through an educational grant to the University of Kentucky Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery.     

腹腔镜修补多发性腹壁切口疝

目的 探讨腹腔镜修补多发腹壁切口疝的手术方法和应用价值。方法 2008年2月首都医科大学宣武医院普外科收治1例腹部三次手术后共造成腹部四处切口疝的复杂病例,切口疝长径分别为12、9、6及3cm。采用疝修补缝合钉固定腹腔内大面积复合补片,行腹腔镜修补术。结果 腹腔镜一次修补4个腹壁切口疝手术成功,无肠管损伤等并发症,术后随访6个月无腹壁切口疝复发。结论 腹腔镜多发腹壁切口疝修补术安全、有效。在开腹手术中暴露多个缺损的难点,在腹腔镜手术中难度大大降低。腹腔镜多发腹壁切口疝修补术不但具有微创优势,而且更能发挥其技术优势。     

Laparoscopic sutured closure with mesh reinforcement of incisional hernias

Background This study reports medium-term outcomes of laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. Study Design Laparoscopic repair was performed on 721 patients with ventral hernia. After adhesiolysis the defect was closed with no. 1 polyamide suture or loop. This was followed by reinforcement with intraperitoneal onlay repair with a bilayered mesh. Results Laproscopic repair of ventral hernia was performed on 613 females and 108 males. Of these, 185 (25.7%) were recurrent incisional hernias of which 93 had undergone previous open hernioplasty. The remaining 92 patients had previously undergone sutured repair. The average operating time was 95 min (range 60–115 min). Conversion rate was 1%. The average hospital stay was 2 days (range 1–6 days). The commonest complication was seroma formation at the incisional hernia site. Full-thickness bowel injury occurred in two patients. The mean follow-up period was 4.2 years (range 3 months to 10 years). Recurrence was noted in four (0.55%) patients. Conclusion Laparoscopic repair is well-tolerated and can be accomplished with minimum morbidity in ventral hernias.