Lactitol vs. lactulose in the treatment of chronic recurrent portal-systemic encephalopathy

To compare the efficacy and patient acceptability of lactitol vs. lactulose in chronic recurrent portal-systemic encephalopathy (PSE), 25 cirrhotic patients with a history of repeated episodes of hepatic encephalopathy who required chronic administration of lactulose were included in a controlled cross-over clinical trial in which patients received, at random, lactitol (at an initial dosage of 10 g/6 h) or lactulose (15 ml/6 h, 66% w/v, containing 10 g of lactulose) during a 3 month period and then crossed-over to the alternative treatment for the following 3 months. Doses were adjusted to obtain two bowel movements per day. During the study period the daily protein intake was 40-60 g. Clinical and analytical data (including ammonia levels) were obtained, an EEG and the number connection test were performed and the PSE index was determined before treatment and monthly until the end of the treatment. No significant differences were found between the effects of lactitol and lactulose on the neurological and biological parameters, suggesting that the two treatments could be considered as equally effective. Lactitol was significantly better tolerated than lactulose (P = 0.02), the taste of which was assessed as being too sweet and provoking nausea. In conclusion, lactitol is a good alternative to lactulose for patients with chronic recurrent PSE, especially in those who do not tolerate the excessive sweetness of lactulose.     

Lactitol vs. lactulose in the treatment of acute hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhotic patients: a double-blind, randomized trial

Lactitol (beta-galactosido-sorbitol) is a nonabsorbable disaccharide available as a powder which, in open comparison, is as effective as lactulose in the treatment of chronic hepatic encephalopathy, but is better tolerated. Twenty-five cirrhotic patients experiencing 28 episodes of acute hepatic encephalopathy were randomized blindly to treatment with either lactitol (n = 15) or lactulose (n = 13). The sugars were dispensed in solutions identical in appearance, taste and pH and of similar osmolarity, which contained either 66.7 gm per 100 ml lactitol or 66.7 ml (44.5 gm) per 100 ml lactulose syrup. The initial dose of 0.75 ml per kg was adjusted to produce two semisoft stools per day. Patients were assessed every 12 hr for 5 days. There were no significant differences in sex ratio, age, body weight, clinical status, duration and extent of coma, etiology of liver disease or of hepatic encephalopathy between the two groups of patients on entry to the trial. An adequate catharsis was obtained with an equivalent mean (+/- 1 S.D.) daily dose of 26 +/- 5 gm lactitol or 31 +/- 7 ml (21 +/- 5 gm) lactulose syrup. During the trial, significant improvements occurred in clinical status and psychometric performance and in the electroencephalogram mean cycle frequencies in the majority of patients in both groups. At the end of the trial, 67% of the patients in the lactitol group and 69% of the lactulose group were clinically normal. However, patients treated with lactitol responded significantly more quickly than patients treated with lactulose.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Lactitol in the treatment of chronic hepatic encephalopathy--a randomized cross-over comparison with lactulose

The effect of lactitol, a new non-absorbable disaccharide, in the treatment of chronic hepatic encephalopathy was assessed in 14 cirrhotic patients with non-selective portosystemic anastomosis in a randomized, cross-over study. At the time of inclusion, all patients showed alterations in mental state, and/or psychometric performance, and in the electroencephalogram. Moreover, 10 out of 14 patients suffered from recurrent episodes of hepatic encephalopathy in the 12 months prior to the study. Patients were randomly treated for two consecutive periods of six months with either lactitol or lactulose. The PSE index was calculated to quantify the neuro-psychiatric impairment. Twelve patients completed the study. The patients required a daily dose of 38.2 g +/- 19 of lactulose or 36.3 g +/- 5 of lactitol to produce two semi-soft stools per day. No deterioration in the mental state or in the other neuro-psychiatric parameters were observed, neither during lactitol nor during lactulose therapy. During the study, mild episodes of recurrent encephalopathy occurred in 60% of the patients taking lactulose, and in 25% of the patients taking lactitol, the difference not being significant (X = 1.54, p = 0.21). Flatulence, the major side-effect noted during the study, was present in 7 of the 12 patients during lactulose treatment, and in 2 patients during lactitol treatment; one patient on lactitol complained of nausea. The side effects which occurred during lactitol of the dosage, while those occurring during lactitol appeared when the dosage was higher than 40 g. Lactitol may be considered at least as effective as lactulose in the treatment of chronic hepatic encephalopathy.     

Lactitol in prevention of recurrent episodes of hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhotic patients with portal-systemic shunt

Recurrent episodes of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) frequently occur in surgically shunted cirrhotic patients. The prevention of these episodes is based mainly on the long-term use of lactulose. Recently, lactitol, a nonabsorbable disaccharide similar to lactulose, has been proposed as an alternative in the management of HE. It has the advantage of being better tolerated and producing a more predictable catharsis. The effects of the two agents were compared in a controlled randomized study lasting six months involving 31 cirrhotic patients with portal-systemic shunt, of whom 40% experienced HE. The PSE index (mental state, EEG, asterixis, Raitan test, and ammonia) was assessed in each patient on entry to the study and every three months during treatment. Episodes of HE, side effects, and the patients' comments on efficacy, tolerability, and palatability were recorded. The dose required to induce two bowel movements per day was 48 +/- 25 ml of lactulose syrup and 36 +/- 7 g of lactitol. During the study, the number of patients who had an episode of HE and the PSE index was similar in both groups. The patients judged lactitol better from the point of view of palatability. Meteorism and flatulence, experienced by patients treated with lactulose, was not reported by the lactitol group. We concluded that lactitol is as effective as lactulose in the long-term prevention of episodes of HE in cirrhotics with portal-systemic shunt and may be better tolerated.     

Comparison of rifaximin and lactitol in the treatment of acute hepatic encephalopathy: results of a randomized,double-blind,double-dummy,controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The efficacy and safety of rifaximin in comparison with lactitol in the treatment of acute hepatic encephalopathy was assessed in a prospective randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, controlled trial. METHODS: A total of 103 patients with grade I-III acute hepatic encephalopathy were randomized to receive rifaximin (50 patients, 1200 mg/day) or lactitol (53 patients, 60 g/day) for 5-10 days. Changes in the portal-systemic encephalopathy (PSE) index on entry and at the end of the study were used to evaluate the efficacy of the two therapies. RESULTS: Both groups were comparable before treatment with regard to demographic data and characteristics of the hepatic encephalopathy episode. The global efficacy of both therapies was similar: 81.6% in the rifaximin group and 80.4% in the lactitol group showed improvement or total regression of the episode. A significantly better evolution of the PSE index was observed in the rifaximin group, due to a greater effect of rifaximin in two components of the index: EEG abnormalities and ammonia levels. No serious adverse events related to either treatment were found during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Rifaximin may be considered a useful and safe alternative therapy to lactitol in the treatment of acute hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis.     

Lactitol in treatment of chronic hepatic encephalopathy

The efficacy and side effects of lactitol in the treatment of chronic hepatic encephalopathy was compared to that of other disaccharides in a meta-analysis of published randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The outcomes assessed were: (1) the rate of patients free from episodes of clinically detectable encephalopathy, and (2) the rate of patients free from one or more side effects in the different treatment groups. Four RCTs were eligible for analysis; in three lactitol was compared to lactulose, in one the alternative treatment was lactose in lactase-deficient patients. The methodological quality of these studies was high. Meta-analysis showed that lactitol was as effective as other disaccharides in the treatment of encephalopathy: pooled odds ratio was 0.83, 95% confidence interval was 0.38–1.82. Results were not sensitive to the use of alternative methods of counting and attributing events in these trials. Patients experienced fewer side effects during treatment with lactitol, but the pooled odds ratio was not statistically significant. In all studies lactitol was considered more palatable. Clinical effectiveness of lactitol, in long-term treatment of chronic encephalopathy, is similar to those of lactulose. It seems that lactitol has lower side effects than lactulose. Future RCTs with a double-blind design could be mainly aimed at evaluating the side-effect profile of the two disaccharides.This work was supported by grants from the Zyma S. A.     

Lactitol and lactulose for the treatment of subclinical hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhotic patients. A randomised, cross-over study

Fourteen patients with cirrhosis and subclinical hepatic encephalopathy were randomised to treatment with lactitol or lactulose for a 2-month period during which they were monitored clinically, by electroencephalography and by manually administered and computer-based psychometric testing. Following a washout period of 4-6 weeks patients were crossed-over to treatment with the alternative sugar for a similar period of monitoring. None of the patients showed evidence of overt hepatic encephalopathy and only one showed slowing of the electroencephalogram mean cycle frequency at the onset of the trial. However, significant impairment was observed in the group as a whole in the performance of all three manually administered psychometric tests and in four of the ten computer-based test variables. No changes were observed in clinical status or in electroencephalogram mean cycle frequency during treatment with either lactitol or lactulose. However, psychometric performance improved consistently, and to the same degree, during treatment with both sugars. Patients required a mean of 26 g (range 8-36) of lactitol and 25 ml (10-60) of lactulose to achieve two semi-soft stools per day. The majority of patients complained of flatulence during treatment with both sugars but this tended to resolve with continued treatment. Diarrhoea developed in a small number of patients during both treatment periods but this was invariably dose-related. Patients were equally divided in their preference for the two sugars. Patients with subclinical hepatic encephalopathy benefit from treatment with lactitol and lactulose in terms of their psychometric performance. The feasibility and benefits of long-term treatment for this condition need to be elucidated.     

Lactitol or lactulose in the treatment of chronic hepatic encephalopathy: results of a meta-analysis.

Lactitol (beta-galactosido-sorbitol) has been recently compared with lactulose for the treatment of chronic hepatic encephalopathy in a few studies, each comprising a small number of patients. The results are controversial. We studied the efficiency and tolerance of both compounds by using a meta-analysis on the basis of published controlled trials. Our study only included controlled or randomized trials comprising cirrhotic patients with chronic hepatic encephalopathy. Analyzed parameters were the portosystemic encephalopathy index of Conn after treatment, the percentage of improved patients and the percentage of patients who had ill effects related to the treatment (flatulence, diarrhea). Bibliographical screening revealed five studies comparing the effects of lactitol and lactulose in chronic hepatic encephalopathy. Four crossover studies were done that included 48 patients and one parallel study that included 29 patients. The duration of the treatment ranged from 3 to 6 mo. All studies found a similar efficiency with both drugs. However, they exhibited some discrepancies in the relative frequency of adverse reactions (flatulence). Meta-analysis showed no statistical differences in the portosystemic encephalopathy index after lactitol or lactulose treatment. The percentage of improved patients after lactitol or lactulose was similar. In contrast, the analysis revealed a higher frequency (p less than 0.01) of flatulence in patients treated with lactulose compared with those treated with lactitol. In conclusion, this meta-analysis shows no statistical difference between therapeutic effects of lactitol and lactulose, but it does show a higher frequency of flatulence with lactulose. This suggests that lactitol should be preferred to lactulose for the treatment of chronic hepatic encephalopathy.     

Rifaximin versus neomycin on hyperammoniemia in chronic portal systemic encephalopathy of cirrhotics. A double-blind, randomized trial.

Preliminary data suggest that rifaximin a new non-absorbable rifamycin-derivate, has beneficial effects on chronic portal systemic encephalopathy (PSE). To compare the efficacy and safety of rifaximin vs neomycin in the treatment of the hyperammoniemic state of PSE, 30 cirrhotic patients with grade I to III of PSE were randomly allocated to one of two groups: group A (15 patients) receiving rifaximin (400 mg/8h) and group B (15 patients) neomycin (1gr/8h). The duration of treatment was 21 consecutive days. Age, sex, hepatic and renal function, level of PSE, EEG and number connection test were similar in both groups. A significant decrease in blood ammonia levels was observed at the end of the treatment period in both groups; moreover rifaximin produced an earlier reduction of blood ammonia levels. The neuropsychic syndrome related to the PSE improved in both groups without significant difference. No side effects attributable to therapy were observed in the rifaximin group. These results indicate that, rifaximin is at least as effective as neomycin in the achievement and maintenance of low blood ammonia levels in cirrhotics with chronic PSE.     

Lactitol,a second-generation disaccharide for treatment of chronic portal-systemic encephalopathy

A double-blind crossover trial was performed to test the therapeutic usefulness and safety of lactitol, a beta-galactoside sorbitol, against lactose in 18 patients with chronic portal-systemic encephalopathy (PSE). The study included four periods: two for washout and two for lactitol and lactose administration. During washout periods, which lasted two weeks each, patients were stabilized with neomycin plus milk of magnesia. Lactitol and lactose were administered during four weeks each. Ten patients were randomly assigned to receive lactose (group A) and eight patients to receive lactitol (group B) first. PSE parameters, ie, mental state, number connection test performance, asterixis and blood ammonia levels were assessed fortnightly. Electroencephalographic tracings and stool pHs were evaluated at the end of each study period. After the first administration of lactose and lactitol, no statistically significant differences in PSE parameters were found. At the same stage, a significant stool acidification (P<0.05) was detected. It is concluded that lactitol seems to be safe and efficacious in treating patients with chronic PSE.     

Lactitol versus lactulose in the treatment of chronic hepatic encephalopathy. A double-blind, randomised, cross-over study

Lactitol is a disaccharide analogue of lactulose which is available as a pure crystalline powder. The efficacy of lactitol in the treatment of chronic hepatic encephalopathy was assessed in 9 cirrhotic patients in a randomised, double-blind, cross-over comparison with lactulose. The sugars were dispensed in solutions, identical in taste and appearance and with similar physico-chemical properties, which contained either 66.7 g/100 ml of lactitol or 66.7 ml (44.5 g)/100 ml of lactulose syrup. Patients were treated for periods of 3 months with each sugar, during which time they were monitored frequently by use of a number of clinical, psychometric and laboratory variables. The sugar solutions were dispensed in an initial dose of 0.75 ml/kg which was adjusted, as necessary, in order to produce two semi-soft stools per day. An adequate catharsis was achieved with a mean (+/- 1 SD) equivalent daily dose of 31.9 +/- 11.2 g of lactitol or 32.9 +/- 16.7 ml (21.9 +/- 11.1 g) of lactulose syrup. Both sugars were equally as effective in the treatment of this condition, even though events likely to cause decompensation arose in 5 patients during treatment with lactitol but in only 1 during treatment with lactulose. Side effects appeared to be more frequent during treatment with lactulose, despite the fact that the parent sugar was diluted in the trial solution; thus 5 patients experienced excessive flatulence and 8 experienced diarrhoea on lactulose compared with only 2 and 4 on lactitol, respectively. In all cases the excessive flatulence occurred independently of sugar dosage whereas the development of diarrhoea was dose-related.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparative modes of action of lactitol and lactulose in the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy.

Lactitol, an unabsorbed sugar with defined laxative threshold and superior taste properties has been suggested as an alternative to lactulose in the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy. In the present study we have compared the colonic metabolism of the two sugars using an in vitro faecal incubation system. Both sugars were readily metabolised by faecal bacteria producing volatile fatty acids and the metabolism was inhibited by neomycin. The effect of lactitol and lactulose on terminal ileal and colonic pH was monitored in six normal subjects using a radiotelemetry technique. Both sugars significantly lowered right colonic pH (basal -6.51 +/- 0.48 vs lactitol -5.63 +/- 0.50; lactulose -5.18 +/- 0.82, p less than 0.05). The pH of rest of the colon and terminal ileum was unaffected. Neomycin given concurrently with lactulose abolished acidification of right colon. As lactitol and lactulose have similar effects within the colon, lactitol would appear to have a role in the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy. As neomycin antagonises the effect of lactulose in the colon, its concurrent use may be less effective in the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy.     

拉克替醇治疗便秘的多中心随机单盲平行对照试验

拉克替醇在国外已作为治疗肝性脑病和便秘的药物上市,但在国内尚未被推荐用于治疗便秘。目的：评价拉克替醇治疗便秘的疗效和安全性。方法：从4个临床医学中心随机纳入符合便秘诊断标准和研究要求的患者．随机分为试验组和对照组。试验组起始剂量（第1d）为拉克替醇20g,维持剂量（第2．7d）为每天10g：对照组起始剂量（第1d）为乳果糖20g,维持剂量（第2～7d）为每天10g。每天早餐时一次服完,疗程7d。排便次数≥3次,d或粪便性状呈Bristol6、7型时,可减半用量。结果：纳入疗效分析的病例数为129例,试验组63例．对照组66例。试验组与对照组治疗前一般情况无明显差异,便秘病情严重程度分布均衡。试验组和对照组用药3d后有效排便次数转正常率分别为77．8％和77．3％,粪便性状转正常率分别为62．2％和56．5％,用药7d后分别为95．2％和95．5％、60．4％和60．8％,两组间差异均无统计学意义。两组不良反应发生率分别为4．8％和4．5％,差异亦无统计学意义。结论：拉克替醇治疗便秘有效、安全．可在临床上推广使用。     

Successful use of vancomycin hydrochloride in the treatment of lactulose resistant chronic hepatic encephalopathy.

Vancomycin hydrochloride (2 g daily) was administered to 12 patients with cirrhosis and lactulose resistant portal systemic encephalopathy in a double blind crossover trial. All 12 patients showed a remarkable clinical improvement after vancomycin treatment. The mean (SE) electroencephalographic (EEG) frequency changed from 6.3 (0.2) to 8.5 (0.2) cps (p less than 0.001) and the mean arterial ammonia concentration from 152 (4) micrograms/ml to 97 (8) micrograms/ml (p less than 0.001). Their clinical condition deteriorated when treatment was switched to lactulose, returning to the previous slower EEG frequency and high arterial ammonia concentrations. Vancomycin seems to be effective in chronic portal systemic encephalopathy in patients who are not helped by lactulose alone.     

Effects of lactulose and lactitol on protein digestion and metabolism in conventional and germ free animal models: relevance of the results to their use in the treatment of portosystemic encephalopathy.

Protein digestion and metabolism have been studied in laboratory rats and miniature pigs to investigate the mechanisms of action of lactulose and lactitol when used in the treatment of patients with portosystemic encephalopathy. Lactulose (beta-D-galactopyranosyl-(1----4)-beta-D-fructofuranose) and lactitol (beta-D-galactopyranosyl-(1----4)-D-glucitol) increased the excretion of nitrogenous material in the faeces and decreased nitrogen excretion in the urine in a similar degree to that reported for human patients. In studies with germ free rats given lactulose no such effect was observed, suggesting that, for lactulose at least, these effects are mediated by the gut flora. Measurement of the alpha-, epsilon-diaminopimelic acid content of the faeces confirmed that the enhancement of faecal nitrogen was due to an increased contribution from bacteria. The similarity in the results for lactulose and lactitol suggests that, from the perspective of protein metabolism, lactitol acts in a similar way to lactulose in the treatment of portosystemic encephalopathy.     

Neomycin-sorbitol and lactulose in the treatment of acute portal-systemic encephalopathy

In a double-blind, randomized study the efficacy of lactulose was compared with neomycin-sorbitol in 45 episodes of acute nitrogenous portal-systemic encephalopathy (PSE) induced by dietary protein, azotemia, or gastrointestinal hemorrhage. All patients had underlying cirrhosis, and at the time of randomization had encephalopathy of at least grade 2 severity and arterial ammonia concentrations greater than 150 g/100 ml. Two thirds of the patients in each group returned to normal mental status and more than 80% in each group showed at least one grade improvement in mental state. In addition, there was equivalent improvement in asterixis, in the performance of the Number Connection Test, in the electroencephalographic pattern, and in arterial ammonia concentration. The principal difference between the two groups was a greater reduction in stool pH after lactulose therapy than after neomycin-sorbitol therapy. One patient randomized to neomycin-sorbitol had to be withdrawn from the study because of persistent vomiting related to the administration of the medication. Otherwise there were no complications attributable to therapy in either group. These data suggest that neomycin-sorbitol and lactulose are equally effective in the treatment of acute nitrogenous portal-systemic encephalopathy.A number of fellows and other colleagues who were coinvestigators in and co-authors of this study are listed alphabetically: Simon Bar-Meir, Joel Bessoff, George A. Cohen, J. Michael Fessel, Jay Frankel, Prakash H. Joshi, Lewis L. Levy, Milton Mutchnick, Donald Petroski, Michael Phillips, and Ned Snyder.     

Long-term results of partial splenic artery embolization as supplemental treatment for portal-systemic encephalopathy

OBJECTIVES: To present long-term results of angiographic partial splenic artery embolization (PSE) as a supplemental treatment of portal-systemic encephalopathy. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with portal-systemic encephalopathy were divided into two groups: 14 patients underwent transportal obliteration and/or balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) of portal-systemic shunts (PSS), followed by PSE (PSE(+) group), and 11 patients underwent only transportal obliteration and/or BRTO of PSS (PSE(-) group). RESULTS: Portal venous pressures pretreatment was similar to posttreatment in the PSE(+) group, but lower than posttreatment in the PSE(-) group. Serum ammonia levels were higher at pretreatment than at 1 wk posttreatment in both groups, but the levels in the two groups were similar at pretreatment, 1 wk, 3 months, 3 yr, 4 yr, and 5 yr posttreatment. However, serum ammonia levels were lower in the PSE(+) group than in the PSE(-) group 6 months, 9 months, 1 yr, and 2 yr posttreatment. Grades of encephalopathy were higher at pretreatment than at 1 wk posttreatment in both groups, but the levels in the two groups were similar at pretreatment, 1 wk, 2 yr, 3 yr, 4 yr, and 5 yr posttreatment. However, grades of encephalopathy were lower in the PSE(+) group than in the PSE(-) group 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 1 yr posttreatment. CONCLUSIONS: Obliteration of PSS followed by PSE benefit patients with portal-systemic encephalopathy.     

Acidifying enemas (lactitol and lactose) vs. nonacidifying enemas (tap water) to treat acute portal-systemic encephalopathy: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial

A double-blind, controlled trial to study the efficacy of acidifying enemas of lactitol, a new galactoside-sorbitol disaccharide, and lactose vs. nonacidifying tap-water enemas was performed in 45 episodes of acute portal-systemic encephalopathy. At the time of randomization, all patients had encephalopathy of at least Grade 2+ severity, delay in the performance of number connection tests and hyperammonemia. A sequential analysis was performed which revealed after the inclusion of the first 20 patients, a significant failure of the nonacidifying enemas as compared to the lactitol enemas (p less than 0.004). The tap-water enema group was, therefore, suspended but the rest of the study continued after rerandomization for lactose and lactitol groups. A favorable response to treatment was obtained in 19 (86%) of the patients receiving lactitol enemas and in 14 (78%) of those receiving lactose enemas. A similar significant improvement in portal-systemic encephalopathy parameters and index was observed after both treatments. Both types of acidifying enemas induced a significant pH decrease in stool (p less than 0.05). These data suggest that acidifying agents like lactose and lactitol are effective and superior to tap-water enemas for the treatment of acute nitrogenous portal-systemic encephalopathy.     

A New Therapy for Portal Systemic Encephalopathy

This report describes a new therapeutic approach to the treatment of adults with portal systemic encephalopathy using sodium benzoate and sodium phenylacetate, two compounds that increase conjugated nitrogen excretion in the urine and that have been shown to be an effective treatment for children with congenital hyperammonemia. The study was a double-blind cross-over study in which each patient was his own control. All patients either improved their mental status (six of eight) or maintained a mental status comparable to that achieved with conventional therapy [lactulose or neomycin (two of eight)]. All decreased their blood ammonias on these medications and seven of eight improved their portal systemic encephalopathy index. It is suggested that these medications may be useful in the treatment of portal systemic encephalopathy.     

Effect of lactitol and lactulose administration on the fecal flora in cirrhotic patients

We compared the effect of lactulose or lactitol on the fecal flora of 21 cirrhotic patients without hepatic encephalopathy. All were treated with an individualized disaccharide dose to achieve and maintain two semiliquid bowel movements per day. Stool pH and fecal flora were determined before and 10 days after stabilizing the cathartic effect. Increased counts of lactobacilli were obtained with both treatments. This increase, which was related to the decreased stool pH, was more constant with lactulose. In addition, lactitol decreased certain proteolytic bacteria such as enterococci and enterobacteria. Both total aerobic and anaerobic bacterial counts showed little quantitative variations with either treatment.