Catheter-associated bloodstream infections in general medical patients outside the intensive care unit: a surveillance study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of central venous catheter (CVC)-associated bloodstream infection (CA-BSI) among patients admitted to general medical wards outside the intensive care unit (ICU). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study performed over a 13-month period, from April 1, 2002, through April 30, 2003. SETTING: Four selected general medical wards at Barnes-Jewish Hospital, a 1,250-bed teaching hospital in Saint Louis, Missouri. PATIENTS; All patients admitted to 4 general medical wards. RESULTS: A total of 7,337 catheter-days were observed during 33,174 patient-days. The device utilization ratio (defined as the number of catheter-days divided by the number of patient-days) was 0.22 overall and was similar among the 4 wards (0.21, 0.25, 0.19, and 0.24). Forty-two episodes of CA-BSI were identified (rate, 5.7 infections per 1,000 catheter-days). Twenty-four (57%) of the 42 cases of CA-BSI were caused by gram-positive bacteria: 10 isolates (24%) were coagulase-negative staphylococci, 10 (24%) were Enterococcus species, and 3 (7%) were Staphylococcus aureus. Gram-negative bacteria caused 7 infections (17%). Five CA-BSIs (12%) were caused by Candida albicans, and 5 infections (12%) had a polymicrobial etiology. Thirty-five patients (83%) with CA-BSI had nontunneled CVCs in place. CONCLUSIONS: Non-ICU medical wards in the study hospital had device utilization rates that were considerably lower than those of medical ICUs, but CA-BSI rates were similar to CA-BSI rates in medical ICUs in the United States. Studies of catheter utilization and on CVC insertion and care should be performed on medical wards. CA-BSI prevention strategies that have been used in ICUs should be studied on medical wards.     

A multicenter intervention to prevent catheter-associated bloodstream infections.

BACKGROUND: Education-based interventions can reduce the incidence of catheter-associated bloodstream infection. The generalizability of findings from single-center studies is limited. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of a multicenter intervention to prevent catheter-associated bloodstream infections. DESIGN: An observational study with a planned intervention. SETTING: Twelve intensive care units and 1 bone marrow transplantation unit at 6 academic medical centers. PATIENTS: Patients admitted during the study period. INTERVENTION: Updates of written policies, distribution of a 9-page self-study module with accompanying pretest and posttest, didactic lectures, and incorporation into practice of evidence-based guidelines regarding central venous catheter (CVC) insertion and care. MEASUREMENTS: Standard data collection tools and definitions were used to measure the process of care (ie, the proportion of nontunneled catheters inserted into the femoral vein and the condition of the CVC insertion site dressing for both tunneled and nontunneled catheters) and the incidence of catheter-associated bloodstream infection. RESULTS: Between the preintervention period and the postintervention period, the percentage of CVCs inserted into the femoral vein decreased from 12.9% to 9.4% (relative ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.88); the total proportion of catheter insertion site dressings properly dated increased from 26.6% to 34.4% (relative ratio, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.17-1.42), and the overall rate of catheter-associated bloodstream infections decreased from 11.2 to 8.9 infections per 1,000 catheter-days (relative rate, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67-0.93). The effect of the intervention varied among individual units. CONCLUSIONS: An education-based intervention that uses evidence-based practices can be successfully implemented in a diverse group of medical and surgical units and reduce catheter-associated bloodstream infection rates.     

A prospective, randomized study in critically ill patients using the Oligon Vantex catheter

Microbial colonization and the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CR-BSI) associated with Oligon Vantex silver central venous catheters (CVC) in critically ill patients were determined. A prospective, randomized, controlled 17-month trial was carried out in an intensive care unit (ICU). All patients requiring a triple-lumen CVC for four days or longer were enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive a standard polyurethane CVC or an Oligon Vantex silver CVC. Before removal of the catheter either due to discharge from the ICU or suspected infection, blood for cultures was taken via the CVC and a peripheral site. Skin and hub swabs and catheter-tips were also cultured. Two hundred and six catheters, 103 in both groups, were evaluated. In the control group (CG) 45/103 (44%) and in the silver group (SG) 30/103 (29%) were colonized or had a CR-BSI (P=0.04). The SG was less likely to be colonized than the CG when the catheter remained in situ for eight days or less (P=0.03) or over 15 days (P=0.01); a second or subsequent catheter was present in the same patient (P=0.002), or if the CVC was placed in the internal jugular vein (P=0.05). Multivariate logistic-regression showed predisposing factors for catheter colonization were jugular and femoral sites, second or subsequent catheter, and being a member of the CG. CR-BSI occurred in five cases (four in CG). Rates of CR-BSI per 1000 catheter-days in the CG were 2.8 and in the SG, 0.8 (P<0.001). The Oligon Vantex silver catheter reduced the incidence of catheter-colonization and may decrease the risk of CR-BSI.     

Efficacy of antiseptic-impregnated catheters on catheter colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infections in patients in an intensive care unit

This study was conducted to evaluate the impact of central venous catheters impregnated with chlorhexidine and silver sulphadiazine on the incidence of colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infection in critically ill patients. One hundred and thirty-three patients requiring central venous catheterization were chosen at random to receive either an antiseptic-impregnated triple-lumen catheter (N=64) or a standard triple-lumen catheter (N=69). The mean (SD) durations of catheterization for the antiseptic and standard catheters were 11.7 (5.8) days (median 10; range 3-29) and 8.9 (4.6) days (median 8.0; range 3-20), respectively (P=0.006). Fourteen (21.9%) of the antiseptic catheters and 14 (20.3%) of the standard catheters had been colonized at the time of removal (P=0.834). Four cases (6.3%) of catheter-related bloodstream infection were associated with antiseptic catheters and one case (1.4%) was associated with a standard catheter (P=0.195). The catheter colonization rates were 18.7/1000 catheter-days for the antiseptic catheter group and 22.6/1000 catheter-days for the standard catheter group (P=0.640). The catheter-related bloodstream infection rates were 5.3/1000 catheter-days for the antiseptic catheter group and 1.6/1000 catheter-days for the standard catheter group (P=0.452). In conclusion, our results indicate that the use of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters has no effect on the incidence of either catheter colonization or catheter-related bloodstream infection in critically ill patients.     

Catheter manipulations and the risk of catheter-associated bloodstream infection in neonatal intensive care unit patients

A prospective cohort study was performed to evaluate the influence of catheter manipulations on catheter associated bloodstream infection (CABSI) in neonates. Neonates admitted between 1 November 1993 and 31 October 1994 at the neonatal intensive care unit of a university hospital were included in the study. Seventeen episodes of CABSI occurred in 357 central catheters over a period of 3470 catheter-days, with a cumulative incidence of 4.7/100 catheters and an incidence density of 4.9/1000 catheter-days. Patient and catheter-related risk factors independently associated with CABSI were: catheter hub colonization (odds ratio [OR] = 32.6, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 4.3-249), extremely low weight (相似文献   

Hospital-wide survey of the use of central venous catheters

There are few data on indications for central venous catheter (CVC) use. We conducted an observational, hospital-wide prospective cohort study to quantify the indications for catheter placement over dwell time and to investigate agreement between healthcare workers (HCWs) on CVC use. Catheter use was observed by on-site visits, HCW interviews, and screening of patient charts. A total of 378 CVCs were inserted in 292 patients, accounting for 2704 catheter-days. Of these, 93% CVCs were multilumen catheters and 70% were placed in the intensive care unit (ICU). Median dwell time (interquartile range) was 5 (2-9) days overall, and 4 (2-7) and 8 (3-15) in the ICU and non-ICU settings, respectively. The mean number of specified indications for CVC use per day was 1.7 (1.9 for ICU and 1.5 for non-ICU; P<0.001). The most frequent reason (49%) for catheter use was prolonged (>7 days) antibiotic therapy followed by parenteral nutrition (22.3%). A total of 130 catheter-days (4.8%) were unnecessary with a higher proportion in non-ICU settings (6.6%). In 94% of cases, there was agreement among HCWs on indications for CVC use. However, 35 on-site visits (8.3%) in non-ICU settings revealed that neither the nurse nor the treating physician knew why the catheter was in place. ICU catheters have a short dwell time but are utilised more often, whereas catheters in non-ICU settings show a reverse characteristic. Prevention measures targeting catheter care are more likely to be successful in non-ICU settings.     

Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections associated with use of povidone-iodine in patients receiving continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

Fifteen episodes of infection due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa, including peritonitis and catheter site infections, occurred in nine patients receiving continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis over a 27-month period. Eight episodes were associated with catheter loss. Occurrence of P aeruginosa infection was significantly associated with use of povidone-iodine solution to cleanse the catheter site. There was no association with use of povidone-iodine solution to disinfect tubing connections, use of other skin care products or exposure to other environmental sources of P aeruginosa. Cultures of available povidone-iodine products were negative. Local irritation and alteration in skin flora caused by antiseptic solution or low-level contamination of povidone-iodine solution are potential mechanisms of infection.     

Bloodstream infections among patients using central venous catheters in intensive care units

Central Venous Catheters (CVC), widely used in Intensive Care Units (ICU) are important sources of bloodstream infections (BSI). This prospective cohort epidemiological analytical study, aimed to infer the incidence of BSI, the risk factors associated and evaluate the care actions related to the use of these catheters in seven ICU in the Federal District--Brasília, Brazil. From the 630 patients using CVC, 6.4% developed BSI (1.5% directly related to the catheter and 4.9% clinic BSI). The hospitalization term was 3.5 times greater among these patients. Different modalities of catheter insertion and antiseptic substances use were observed. Time of CVC permanence was significantly associated to infection incidence (p<1x10(-8)) as well as the right subclavian access and double-lumen catheters. Patients with neurological disorders and those submitted to tracheotomy were the most affected. We suggest the organization of a "catheter group" aiming to standardize procedures related to the use of catheters in order to reduce the hospitalization term and hospital costs.     

Preventing catheter-associated bloodstream infections: a survey of policies for insertion and care of central venous catheters from hospitals in the prevention epicenter program.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent to which evidence-based practices for the prevention of central venous catheter (CVC)-associated bloodstream infections are incorporated into the policies and practices of academic intensive care units (ICUs) in the United States and to determine variations in the policies on CVC insertion, use, and care. DESIGN: A 9-page written survey of practices and policies for nontunneled CVC insertion and care. SETTING: ICUs in 10 academic tertiary-care hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: ICU medical directors and nurse managers. RESULTS: Twenty-five ICUs were surveyed (1-6 ICUs per hospital). In 80% of the units, 5 separate groups of clinicians inserted 24%-50% of all nontunneled CVCs. In 56% of the units, placement of more than two-thirds of nontunneled CVCs was performed in a single location in the hospital. Twenty units (80%) had written policies for CVC insertion. Twenty-eight percent of units had a policy requiring maximal sterile-barrier precautions when CVCs were placed, and 52% of the units had formal educational programs with regard to CVC insertion. Eighty percent of the units had a policy requiring staff to perform hand hygiene before inserting CVCs, but only 36% and 60% of the units required hand hygiene before accessing a CVC and treating the exit site, respectively. CONCLUSION: ICU policy regarding the insertion and care of CVCs varies considerably from hospital to hospital. ICUs may be able to improve patient outcome if evidence-based guidelines for CVC insertion and care are implemented.     

A needleless closed system device (CLAVE) protects from intravascular catheter tip and hub colonization: a prospective randomized study

Hub colonization and subsequent intraluminal progression due to frequent opening and manipulation of intravenous systems is the cause of many catheter-related infections (CRI). A prospective, comparative, randomized study was performed to assess a new closed-needleless hub device (CLAVE) compared with conventional open systems (COS). End-points were hub and skin colonization, catheter tip colonization, catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) and number of accidental needlesticks. All cultures were processed following standard semiquantitative microbiological techniques. The study involved patients who underwent heart surgery over an 11-month period in a post-surgical ICU. During the study period, 352 patients underwent major heart surgery and 1774 catheters were inserted. Overall, 865 catheters in 178 patients were allocated to the CLAVE system and 909 catheters in 174 patients to COS. The groups were similar regarding underlying conditions and risk factors for infection. Comparison of endpoint results in CLAVE and COS groups was as follows: incidence density per 1000 catheter-days of tip colonization: 59.2 versus 83.6 (P=0.003); of hub colonization: 7.56 versus 24.66 (P=0.0017); of skin colonization: 41.5 versus 58.9 (P=0.038); and of CRBSI 3.78 versus 5.89 (P=0.4). There was one accidental needlestick and one catheter-related prosthetic endocarditis in the COS group. Multivariate analysis showed that CLAVE use was an independent protective factor for tip colonization. CLAVE offered significant protection from catheter-tip and hub colonization.     

Effect of education and performance feedback on rates of catheter-associated urinary tract infection in intensive care units in Argentina.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of education and performance feedback regarding compliance with catheter care and handwashing on rates of catheter-associated urinary tract infection (UTI) in intensive care units (ICUs). SETTING: Two level III adult ICUs in a private healthcare facility in Argentina. PATIENTS: All adult patients admitted to the study units who had a urinary catheter in place for at least 24 hours. METHODS: A prospective, open trial in which rates of catheter-associated UTI determined during a baseline period of active surveillance without education and performance feedback were compared with rates of catheter-associated UTI after implementing education and performance feedback. RESULTS: There were 1,779 catheter-days during the baseline period and 5,568 catheter-days during the intervention period. Compliance regarding prevention of compression of the tubing by a leg improved (from 83% to 96%; relative risk [RR], 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI95], 1.03 to 1.28; P = .01) and so did compliance with handwashing (from 23.1% to 65.2%; RR, 2.82; CI95, 2.49 to 3.20; P < .0001). Catheter-associated UTI rates decreased significantly from 21.3 to 12.39 per 1,000 catheter-days (RR, 0.58; CI%, 0.39 to 0.86; P = .006). CONCLUSION: Implementing education and performance feedback regarding catheter care measures and handwashing compliance was associated with a significant reduction in catheter-associated UTI rates. Similar programs may help reduce catheter-associated UTI rates in other Latin American hospitals.     

集束化方案预防导管相关性血流感染的研究

目的研究集束化管理方案预防导管相关性血流感染的效果,探讨有效可行的血液导管管理方法。方法将ICU 791例深静脉置管患者作为研究对象,第1阶段2009年6-11月371例,4105个导管日采用传统的血液导管管理方法,为对照组;第2阶段2010年1-6月420例,4824个导管日为集束化组,比较两组导管相关性血行感染(CRBSI)发生率、住ICU时间及血液病原学检查结果,采用t检验和χ2检验进行统计学分析。结果集束化组CRBSI发生22例,发生率4.56‰,对照组发生34例,发生率8.28‰,两组比较CRBSI发生率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论集束化管理能有效预防CRBSI的发生。     

Clinical predictors of infection of central venous catheters used for total parenteral nutrition

To identify predictors of infection in catheters used for total parenteral nutrition (TPN), clinical and microbiological data were prospectively collected on 169 catheter systems (88 patients). Based on semiquantitative catheter cultures, infection was associated with a positive insertion site skin culture taken close to the time of catheter removal (relative risk [RR] = 4.50), especially one yielding greater than or equal to 50 colonies of an organism other than coagulase-negative staphylococci. Infection was also associated with erythema at the insertion site greater than 4 mm in diameter (RR = 2.93). In a subset of 67 catheters for which blood cultures were obtained, infection was also associated with a positive peripheral venous blood culture (RR = 5.90) and a positive central venous blood culture obtained through the catheter (RR = 5.44). Based on a logistic regression model, periodic cultures of the insertion site should be useful in evaluating subsequent fever in stable patients with indwelling central venous catheters. Another source of fever is likely if inflammation is absent and there is either no colonization or there is colonization by less than 50 colonies of coagulase-negative staphylococci at the insertion site. Conversely, the catheter should be removed and cultured semiquantitatively if the site is colonized by an organism other than coagulase-negative staphylococci. We suggest that blood culture results add little to the risk estimate in these situations.     

Cohort study of the pathogenesis and molecular epidemiology of catheter-related bloodstream infection in neonates with peripherally inserted central venous catheters.

OBJECTIVE: To better define the pathogenesis of catheter-related bloodstream infection (BSI) in neonates with peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) to guide the development of more effective strategies for prevention. DESIGN: Prospective nested cohort study. SETTING: Level III neonatal intensive care unit in a community hospital. METHODS: During a randomized trial to assess the safety and efficacy of a prophylactic vancomycin-heparin catheter-lock solution for the prevention of catheter-related BSI in neonates with PICCs, we performed cultures of peripheral and catheter-drawn blood samples, and quantitative cultures of catheter hub samples if BSI was suspected clinically. We performed semiquantitative cultures of the catheter tip and the catheter hub and the skin at the insertion site when the catheter was removed. Molecular subtyping by pulsed-field electrophoresis was used to determine the probable pathogenesis of all BSIs due to coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS); for BSIs caused by other microorganisms, epidemiologic concordance was based on speciation and antibiograms. Catheter-related BSI was considered extraluminally acquired if concordance was demonstrable solely between isolates recovered from the catheter tip and the blood, independent of concordance with isolates recovered from the insertion site. Catheter-related BSI was considered intraluminally acquired if concordance was demonstrated only between isolates recovered from the catheter hub and the blood. The source of the infection was considered indeterminate if both concordance patterns were present. RESULTS: Nosocomial BSI was identified in 23 of the 82 neonates in the cohort. Fifteen of these infections, 14 of which were caused by CoNS, were considered definite or probable catheter-related BSIs. Catheter-related BSI was intraluminally acquired in 10 (67%) of 15 patients, extraluminally acquired in 3 (20%), and indeterminate in 2 (13%). CONCLUSIONS: Most catheter-related BSIs in neonates with PICCs are caused by CoNS and derive from intraluminal contamination. Strategies for prevention of catheter-related BSI directed at this predominant mechanism of infection are most likely to be effective.     

Prevention of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections using non-technologic strategies.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of nosocomial bacteremias related to the use of non-impregnated central venous catheters (CVCs) when only non-technologic strategies were used to prevent them. DESIGN: This was a prospective study of infectious complications of CVCs placed in intensive care unit (ICU) patients from April 1997 to December 2001. SETTING: The medical-surgical ICU of a tertiary-care, university-affiliated hospital in Argentina. METHODS: We studied all patients admitted to the ICU using non-impregnated CVCs. Maximal sterile barrier precautions (ie, use of cap, mask, sterile gown, sterile gloves, and large sterile drape), strict handwashing, preparation of the patients' skin with antiseptic solutions, insertion and management of catheters by trained personnel, and continuing quality improvement programs aimed at appropriate insertion and maintenance of catheters were employed. RESULTS: During the study period, 2,525 patients were admitted to the ICU. Eight hundred sixty-eight patients had 1,037 CVCs inserted. The number of CVC-related bloodstream infections (BSIs), acquired in the ICU, was 2.7 per 1,000 CVC-days (13 nosocomial CVC-related BSIs during 4,770 days of CVC use). Microorganisms isolated included methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (n = 6), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (n = 2), coagulase-negative methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus (n = 2), Escherichia coli (n = 1), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 1), and Enterobacter cloacae (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: A low rate of catheter-related BSI was achieved without antimicrobial-impregnated catheters. The incidence of CVC-associated bacteremias corresponded to the 10th to 20th percentile range of the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System hospitals for the same type of ICU.     

Bloodstream infections in pediatric oncology outpatients: a new healthcare systems challenge.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate a perceived increase in central venous catheter (CVC)-associated bloodstream infections (BSIs) among pediatric hematology-oncology outpatients. DESIGN: A case-control study. SETTING: A pediatric hematology-oncology outpatient clinic at Fresno Children's Hospital. PATIENTS: Pediatric hematology-oncology clinic outpatients with CVCs at Fresno Children's Hospital between November 1994 and October 1997. METHODS: A case-patient was defined as any hematology-oncology outpatient with a CVC-associated BSI at Fresno Children's Hospital from November 1996 to October 1997 (study period) without a localizable infection. To identify case-patients, we reviewed Fresno Children's Hospital records for all hematology-oncology clinic patients, those with CVCs and those with CVCs and BSIs. Control-patients were randomly selected hematology-oncology outpatients with a CVC but no BSI during the study period. Case-patient and control-patient demographics, diagnoses, caretakers, catheter types, catheter care, and water exposure were compared. RESULTS: Twenty-five case-patients had 42 CVC-associated BSIs during the study period. No significant increase in CVC-associated BSI rates occurred among pediatric hematology-oncology patients. However, there was a statistically significant increase in nonendogenous, gram-negative (eg, Pseudomonas species) BSIs during summer months (May-October) compared with the rest of the year. Case-patients and control-patients differed only in catheter type; case-patients were more likely than control-patients to have a transcutaneous CVC. Summertime recreational water exposures were similar and high in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Hematology-oncology clinic patients with transcutaneous CVCs are at greater risk for CVC-associated BSI, particularly during the summer. Caretakers should be instructed on proper care of CVCs, particularly protection of CVCs during bathing and recreational summer water activities, to reduce the risk of nonendogenous, gram-negative BSIs.     

Investigation of an outbreak of gram-negative bacteremia among hematology-oncology outpatients.

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors associated with an outbreak of gram-negative bacteremia (GNB). SETTING: A university hospital. PATIENTS: Hematology-oncology outpatients. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients developed GNB; 13 patients experienced more than one episode, and eight blood cultures grew more than one gram-negative organism. The most frequently isolated organisms were Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Acinetobacter johnsonii. When the GNB patients (cases) were compared with randomly selected hematology-oncology patients (controls), central venous catheter (CVC) self-care (71% vs 39%; P=.02), and duration of recent hospital stay (median, 15 vs 4 days; P=.01) were identified as risk factors. In a logistic regression model, duration of recent hospital stay was the only risk factor significantly associated with GNB (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.08; P<.02). CONCLUSIONS: Hematology-oncology patients providing their own CVC care who have recently been hospitalized for more than 2 weeks may be at increased risk of GNB. CVCs should be protected from possible environmental contamination in hematologyoncology patients. Patients providing their own CVC care should undergo continued rigorous education regarding proper CVC care.     

Skin antisepsis kits containing alcohol and chlorhexidine gluconate or tincture of iodine are associated with low rates of blood culture contamination.

OBJECTIVE: Skin preparation is an important factor in reducing the rate of blood culture contamination. We assessed blood culture contamination rates associated with the use of skin antisepsis kits containing either 2% alcoholic chlorhexidine gluconate or 2% alcoholic tincture of iodine. DESIGN: Prospective, blinded clinical trial. SETTING: Tertiary-care teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Adult patients in medical wards, the medical intensive care unit, and the cardiac intensive care unit who needed paired, percutaneous blood cultures. INTERVENTIONS: House officers, medical students, and healthcare technicians drew the blood for cultures. We prepared sacks containing all of the necessary supplies, including two different types of antiseptic kits. In each sack, one kit contained 2% chlorhexidine in 70% isopropyl alcohol and the other contained 2% tincture of iodine in ethyl alcohol and 70% isopropyl alcohol. Each patient received chlorhexidine at one site and tincture of iodine at the other. RESULTS: Four (0.9%) of 430 blood culture sets from 215 patients were contaminated. The contamination rate when using alcohol and chlorhexidine (1 of 215, 0.5%) did not differ significantly from the contamination rate when using tincture of iodine (3 of 215, 1.4%; P = .62, McNemar test). There was an 87% probability that the two interventions differed by less than 2% in their rate of contamination. CONCLUSIONS: Both of these antiseptic kits were highly effective for skin preparation prior to drawing blood for cultures. The use of these kits may have contributed to the low contamination rate observed in this study.     

Device-associated infection rates for non-intensive care unit patients.

BACKGROUND: Reference data from intensive care units (ICUs) are not applicable to non-ICU patients because of the differences in device use rates, length of stay, and severity of underlying diseases among the patient populations. In contrast to the huge amount of data available for ICU patients, appropriate surveillance data for non-ICU patients have been missing in Germany. OBJECTIVE: To establish a new module ("DEVICE-KISS") of the German Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System for generating stratified reference data for non-ICU wards. SETTING: Non-ICU patients from 42 German hospitals. METHODS: Monthly patient-days, device-days and nosocomial infections (NIs) (using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definitions) were counted. Device use rates were calculated, and NI rates were stratified by different medical specialities. RESULTS: From July 2002 through June 2004, among the 77 wards, there were a total of 536,955 patient-days and 74,188 device-days (for CVC-associated primary bloodstream infections, there were 181,401 patient-days and 8,317 central vascular catheter [CVC]-days in 29 wards; for urinary catheter-associated urinary tract infections, there were 445,536 patient-days and 65,871 urinary catheter-days in 65 wards) and 483 NIs (36 bloodstream infections and 447 urinary tract infections). The mean device use rates were 4.6 device-days per 100 patient-days for CVCs (29 wards) and 14.8 device-days per 100 patient-days for urinary catheters (65 wards), respectively. Mean device-associated NI rates were 4.3 infections per 1,000 CVC-days for CVC-associated bloodstream infections and 6.8 infections per 1,000 urinary catheter-days for catheter-associated urinary tract infections. CONCLUSIONS: DEVICE-KISS allows non-ICUs to recognize an outlier position with regard to NIs by providing well-founded reference data for non-ICU patients.