Relationship of proximal fixation to renal dysfunction in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair

Technological advancements have lead to dramatic improvements in stentgraft device design resulting in more trackable delivery systems and transrenal uncovered stents and barbs for better fixation. Transrenal bare-stents may limit stentgraft migration, particularly in patients with short or flared proximal aortic necks. However, potential disadvantages might be in worsening renal function, particularly in patients with preexisting renal insufficiency. We retrospectively analyzed our recent 7 year experience of patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using a variety of stentgrafts with and without transrenal bare-stent fixation. Patients were divided into 2 groups; infrarenal fixation (IRF) vs transrenal fixation (TRF), or patients with preoperative serum Cr values that were normal (= or <1.5 mg/dl) vs slightly elevated (1.6-2 mg/dl), vs markedly elevated (2.1- 3.5 mg/dl). The exclusion criteria included patients with chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) on hemodialysis, and preoperative high-grade renal artery stenoses requiring angioplasty and stenting. Of 705 patients that underwent EVAR, 496 (IRF: 385 [78%], and TRF: 111 [22%]) were available with routine evaluations of serum Cr and CT scans. Preexisting comorbidities, mean procedure contrast volume, and postprocedure follow-up were similar in both groups. In the immediate postoperative period, mean serum Cr did not change significantly in either the IRF group (1.3+/-0.7 mg/dl to 1.2+/-0.9 mg/dl) or the TRF group (1.3+/-0.5 mg/dl to 1.3+/-0.6 mg/dl). Mean serum Cr did, however, significantly increase over longer follow-up in both groups: 1.4+/-0.8 mg/dl for IRF (P<0.03), and 1.5 +/- 0.8 mg/dl for TRF (P<0.01). Cr clearance was similarly unchanged in the immediate postoperative period (58+/-23 to 61+/-25 ml/min/1.73 m2 for IRF group, 53+/-17 to 55+/-17 ml/min/1.73 m2 for TRF group), but was significantly decreased in longer follow-up (53+/-23 ml/min/1.73 m2 for IRF, p<0.02: and 48+/-16 ml/min/1.73 m2 for TRF, P<0.01). There were no significant differences in serum Cr increase (p=0.19) or Cr clearance decrease (p=0.68) between the IRF and TRF groups. Small renal infarcts were noted in 6 patients (1.6%) in the IRF group, and in 8 patients (7%) in the TRF group (p=0.37). Of patients with normal preoperative renal function, renal dysfunction developed in 7.7% of IRF group and 6.1% of TRF group (p=0.76). In patients with preexisting CRI, renal dysfunction developed in 18.2% of IRF group, and 17.1% of TRF group (p=0.95). Eight patients with postoperative renal dysfunction, 5 (1.3%) from IRF group and 3 (2.7%) from TRF group subsequently required hemodialysis, and this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.91). We also analyzed 200 consecutive patients undergoing EVAR with intra-arterial contrast agents with and without preexisting CRI not on dialysis. The groups were identified on the basis of preprocedure serum Cr: group 1 (n=108), Cr less than 1.5 mg/dL (normal range); group 2 (n=65), Cr 1.5 to 2.0 mg/dL; group 3 (n=27), Cr 2.1 to 3.5 mg/dL. Routine precautions in patients with CRI included preoperative intravenous hydration with 2 L of normal saline solution, discontinuation of all nephrotoxic drugs, intraoperative administration of mannitol (0.5 g/kg intravenously), and use of nonionic, low osmolar intra-arterial contrast agent (Omnipaque 350). One-hundred and eight patients had normal renal function (group 1), and 92 patients had preexisting CRI with baseline Cr 1.5 to 2.0 mg/dL (group 2, n=65) or 2.1 to 3.5 mg/dL (group 3, n=27). Comorbid conditions included coronary artery disease (group 1, 51%; group 2, 49%; group 3, 59%), hypertension (group 1, 39%; group 2, 46%; group 3, 52%), and diabetes mellitus (group 1, 25%; group 2, 35%; group 3, 48%). In groups 1, 2, and 3, the mean volume of low osmolar contrast agent used was 210 cc, 160 cc, 130 cc, respectively; hemodynamic instability developed in 3, 1, and 1 patient, respectively. The incidence of postoperative complications between the 3 study groups was not statistically different. In grications between the 3 study groups was not statistically different. In group 1 a transient increase in serum Cr (>30% over baseline and >1.4 mg/dL) was noted in 3 patients (2.7%), 2 of whom (1.9%) required temporary hemodialysis and 1 (0.9%) who died of renal failure. In group 2 a transient increase in serum Cr was noted in 2 patients (3.1%); both patients (3.1%) required temporary hemodialysis, and 1 patient (1.5%) died of renal failure. In group 3 a transient increase in serum Cr was noted in 2 patients (7.4%); 1 patient (3.7%) required temporary hemodialysis, and 1 patient (3.7%) died of renal failure. Perioperative hypotension significantly increased the risk for elevated serum Cr and death (p<0.05), and larger contrast volume was associated with an increase in serum Cr (p<0.05) during the postoperative period. Following EVAR renal function declines slightly with both IRF and TRF. Our data show no overall difference between patients with IRF and TRF with respect to infarcts, decline in renal function, or onset of dialysis. There were a slightly greater number of renal infarcts in the TRF group, but these infarcts were clinically inconsequential. In patients with CRI, EVAR with intra-arterial radiographic contrast agents is believed to impair renal function, and CRI is considered a relative contraindication to the procedure. Results of our investigation indicate that risk for worsening renal insufficiency, dialysis, and death is only slightly and not significantly greater in patients with CRI compared with patients with normal renal function. With appropriate precautions of avoiding perioperative hypotension and limiting the volume of nonionic contrast agents, CRI need not be a contraindication for EVAR with intra-arterial contrast agents.     

Nephrotoxicity of vancomycin in patients with normal serum creatinine

Sir, The reported rate of nephrotoxicity of vancomycin (VCM) hasbeen 7–16%. It can reach 35% with concurrent aminoglycosidesand is associated with serum concentration >40 µg/ml[     

Assessment of renal function in recently admitted critically ill patients with normal serum creatinine.

BACKGROUND: Detection of renal dysfunction is important in critically ill patients, and in daily practice, serum creatinine is used most often. Other tools allowing the evaluation of renal function are the Cockcroft-Gault and MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) equations. These parameters may, however, not be optimal for critically ill patients. The present study evaluated the value of a single serum creatinine measurement, within normal limits, and three commonly used prediction equations for assessment of glomerular function (Cockcroft-Gault, MDRD and the simplified MDRD formula), compared with creatinine clearance (Ccr) measured on a 1 h urine collection in an intensive care unit (ICU) population. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study. A total of 28 adult patients with a serum creatinine <1.5 mg/dl, within the first week of ICU admission, were included in the study. Renal function was assessed with serum creatinine, timed 1 h urinary Ccr, and the Cockcroft-Gault, MDRD and simplified MDRD equations. RESULTS: Serum creatinine was in the normal range in all patients. Despite this, measured urinary Ccr was <80 ml/min/1.73 m2 in 13 patients (46.4%), and <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 in seven patients (25%). Urinary creatinine levels were low, especially in patients with low Ccr, suggesting a depressed production of creatinine caused by pronounced muscle loss. Regression analysis and Bland-Altman plots revealed that neither the Cockcroft-Gault formula nor the MDRD equations were specific enough for assessment of renal function. CONCLUSIONS: In recently admitted critically ill patients with normal serum creatinine, serum creatinine had a low sensitivity for detection of renal dysfunction. Furthermore, the Cockcroft-Gault and MDRD equations were not adequate in assessing renal function.     

Undiagnosed renal impairment in patients with and without diabetes with normal serum creatinine undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

HYPOTHESIS: The recent Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative publication on the evaluation, classification and stratification of chronic kidney disease (CKD) states that individuals with a reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is at greater risk for cardiovascular diseases and cardiac deaths. AIM: To determine the prevalence of kidney dysfunction in a cohort of 1390 patients with and without diabetes with normal serum creatinine undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: Kidney function was estimated using simplified MDRD, Cockcroft-Gault and Jeliffe formulas. RESULTS: Normal serum creatinine was observed in 93% patients. Mean estimated GFR in 1068 non-diabetic patients was significantly higher than in 322 diabetic patients (all formulas). Diabetic females had significantly lower creatinine and estimated GFR, higher high-density lipoprotein and platelet count than diabetic males. A very high prevalence of CKD up to 77% was found in studied diabetic patients. Clinically significant CKD (as defined by GFR < 60 mL/min) was found in 13.0-33.8% patients depending on the formula used to estimate GFR. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of CKD (stages 2-3) is high in diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention despite normal creatinine. The risk of contrast nephropathy with worse outcomes is enhanced in these patients, particularly in elderly and females. Evaluation of renal function is important in order to select the appropriate strategy to reduce the cardiovascular risk.     

Occult renal impairment is common in patients with peripheral vascular disease and normal serum creatinine.

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and angiography/angioplasty is rising annually. The UK Small Aneurysm Trial and other trials have shown renal function is a predictor of increased mortality and failed infrainguinal bypass despite patent vessels. Renal function is classically assessed by serum creatinine (SCr). However, SCr can be normal despite significant renal impairment. A more sensitive test is creatinine clearance (CrCl) as determined by 24-hour urine collection in combination with SCr. We studied the incidence of renal impairment, as defined by CrCl, in PVD patients with normal SCr. METHODOLOGY: All patients with PVD sufficient to necessitate angiography and normal SCr (< or =120 micromol/l - men; < or =97 micromol/l - women) had their CrCl assessed prior to angiography: using both 24-hour urine collection and the Cockcroft-Gault formula. Various blood tests, a detailed history and examination were performed. A control group of arthritic patients, age and sex-matched with similar SCr, also had their CrCl determined. RESULTS: 65 of 76 patients (86%) with normal SCr had a subnormal CrCl (<100 ml/min) and 49 (65%) had a CrCl below 60 ml/min. In the control group of arthritic patients, the proportion having impaired CrCl was significantly less - 67% below 100 mls/min (p=0.0471) and only 15% below 60 mls/min (p<0.0001). The median and interquartile range CrCl of 52 [38-81] mls/min for PVD patients was significantly worse than for control patients (80 [68-119] mls/min -p<0.0001). The Cockcroft-Gault formula for calculating CrCl did not correlate well with the urinary CrCl for the control group but did for PVD patients (p<0.0001). Factors associated with a significantly reduced CrCl were age of at least 75 years, SCr of at least 85 micromol/l and a history of coronary heart disease (all p<0.05). This had a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 82% for identifying subnormal CrCl. Statin use was associated with a significantly improved CrCl (p=0.040). CONCLUSION: Most PVD patients with normal serum creatinine have occult, significantly impaired renal function as defined by creatinine clearance. Vascular surgeons should include creatinine clearance in pre-operative assessment of renal function especially in patients over 75 years old, with a history of coronary heart disease or a serum creatinine over 85 micromol/l. The method of determining creatinine clearance could be the Cockcroft-Gault calculation or ideally 24-hour urinary creatinine clearance measurement. This would allow appropriate early referral to a nephrologist for further investigation and management. It is worth noting that statin use seems to be associated with a protective effect on renal function.     

血清S100ββ变化与老年患者腹部手术后认知功能障碍的关系

目的观察老年患者腹部手术后S100ββ蛋白的变化以及术后认知功能障碍(POCD)的发生情况,并探讨二者的关系。方法26例65岁以上的老年患者ASAⅡ~Ⅲ级,行腹部手术。监测术前、术毕、术后6、24、48、72h血清S100ββ的变化,并评定术前及术后1周内的认知功能。结果老年患者血清S100ββ蛋白在术毕最高(P<0·01),术后6h和24h逐渐下降,但术后48h再次上升(P<0·01),术后72h回复至术前水平。26例老年患者腹部手术后1周内有7例发生POCD。POCD组与非POCD组相比,术毕及术后6h血清S100ββ蛋白水平明显增高(P<0·05)。结论老年患者腹部手术后POCD的发生与血清S100ββ蛋白的变化有密切关系。血清S100ββ蛋白可作为评估老年患者术后发生POCD的重要指标。     

Predictive performance of renal function equations for patients with chronic kidney disease and normal serum creatinine levels

Accurate renal function measurements are important for the diagnosis and treatment of kidney disease, proper medication dosing, interpretation of possible uremic symptoms, and decision-making regarding when to initiate renal replacement therapy. Because the use of highly accurate filtration markers to measure renal function has traditionally been limited by cumbersome and costly techniques and the involvement of radioactivity (among other factors), renal function is typically estimated by using specially derived prediction equations. These formulae usually use serum creatinine levels, i.e., a marker of filtration that is insensitive to mild/moderate decreases in GFR. Although attempts have been made to validate certain renal function prediction equations among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) with abnormal serum creatinine levels, this is the first study to specifically evaluate the predictive performance of these equations for patients with CKD and serum creatinine levels in the normal range. The results of eight prediction equations for 109 patients with CKD and serum creatinine levels of < or =1.5 mg/dl were compared with standard iohexol GFR values. The most accurate results were obtained with the Cockroft-Gault and Bjornsson equations. The most precise formulae were the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equations, although they were highly biased. Even the most accurate results exhibited levels of error that made them suboptimal for clinical treatment of these patients. These results suggest that measurement of GFR with endogenous or exogenous filtration markers might be the most prudent strategy for the assessment of renal function in the CKD population with normal serum creatinine levels. Further studies are needed to confirm the generalizability of these findings for this patient subgroup.     

Correlation of serum cyclosporine concentration with renal dysfunction in marrow transplant recipients

We retrospectively analyzed the relationship of serum cyclosporine concentration to renal dysfunction in 63 marrow transplant recipients who received cyclosporine for prophylaxis of acute graft-versus-host disease. Patients were divided into three groups according to their mean trough cyclosporine concentration for the first 28 days of therapy: less than 150, 150-250, and greater than 250 ng/ml. Baseline renal function and exposure to nephrotoxic antibiotics was comparable in the three groups. Renal dysfunction was defined as doubling of baseline serum creatinine. The likelihood of developing renal dysfunction was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier product limit estimates. The log-rank test was used to compare the three groups. Fifty-four (86%) of the patients developed renal dysfunction. The incidence of renal dysfunction was 73%, 95%, and 100%, and it developed at a median of 46, 29, and 20 days in patients with a mean trough concentration of less than 150, 150-250, and greater than 250 ng/ml, respectively (P less than 0.001). Eight of the nine patients who did not develop renal dysfunction had a mean trough concentration of less than 150 ng/ml. These data indicate that the incidence and the rate of development of renal dysfunction are related to serum cyclosporine concentration.     

Serum creatinine patterns in coronary bypass surgery patients with and without postoperative cognitive dysfunction

Renal dysfunction is common after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. We have previously shown that CABG procedures complicated by stroke have a threefold greater peak serum creatinine level relative to uncomplicated surgery. However, postoperative creatinine patterns for procedures complicated by cognitive dysfunction are unknown. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that postoperative cognitive dysfunction is associated with acute perioperative renal injury after CABG surgery. Data were prospectively gathered for 282 elective CABG surgery patients. Psychometric tests were performed at baseline and 6 wk after surgery. Cognitive dysfunction was defined both as a dichotomous variable (cognitive deficit [CD]) and as a continuous variable (cognitive index). Forty percent of patients had CD at 6 wk. However, the association between peak percentage change in postoperative creatinine and CD (parameter estimate = -0.41; P = 0.91) or cognitive index (parameter estimate = -1.29; P = 0.46) was not significant. These data indicate that postcardiac surgery cognitive dysfunction, unlike stroke, is not associated with major increases in postoperative renal dysfunction. IMPLICATIONS: We previously noted that patients with postcardiac surgery stroke also have greater acute renal injury than unaffected patients. However, in the same setting, we found no difference in renal injury between patients with and without cognitive dysfunction. Factors responsible for subtle postoperative cognitive dysfunction do not appear to be associated with clinically important renal effects.     

How valuable for prognosis is the perioperative assessment of serum creatinine values with reference to postoperative renal complications in risk patients?

Renal function is not considered to be as important as cardiovascular or respiratory function during the perioperative period. Nevertheless, recent studies demonstrate a significant correlation between preoperative levels of creatinine and postoperative disturbances of kidney function. METHOD AND RESULTS: In a retrospective study 250 patients with the ASA physical status classification III and IV were investigated. All patients had a preoperative creatinine level greater than 1.0 mg/dl. For further investigations patients were divided into two groups; group I consisted of patients with preoperative creatinine level of 1.0-1.19 mg/dl; group II patients had preoperative creatinine levels greater than 1.2 mg/dl. Postoperatively these parameters were monitored on the 1st, 3rd and 5th days. A deterioration of renal function was seen postoperatively in all high risk patients (Tables 3, 4). Group II patients showed significant changes in kidney function on the 3rd and 5th postoperative days (p less than 0.005). During the study period the creatinine levels in this group did not return to normal values. In this group four patients suffered acute postoperative kidney failure, and two of these died. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: In a recent study Hou et al. [5] could show that 5% of all patients suffer renal insufficiency during their hospital stay. Mortality for acquired renal failure is still 40-70%. The most important factor in the development of disturbances of kidney function is pre-existing kidney disease. The patients investigated in this study were high-risk patients. Cardiovascular complications during the perioperative phase are common, and hemodynamically mediated renal failure is the most frequent form of kidney failure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Relationship of renal dysfunction to proximal arterial disease severity in atherosclerotic renovascular disease.

BACKGROUND: Renal impairment is common in patients with atherosclerotic renovascular disease (ARVD), but its pathogenesis is uncertain. This study investigated whether any relationship existed between renal function and the severity of proximal renal arterial lesions in patients with ARVD. METHODS: A cohort of 71 patients had creatinine clearance measured at the time of digital subtraction angiography; eight patients were diabetics and were excluded from further analysis. The severity of proximal renovascular lesions was estimated by standard methodology, and patients were sub-grouped according to residual patency of the proximal renal arteries (e.g. normal=2.0; unilateral occlusion )RAO(=1.0). Renal bipolar lengths at ultrasound were also assessed. RESULTS: Sixty-three non-diabetic patients (mean+/-SD age 67.7+/-5.8 years; 34 males) were suitable for study. No differences in renal function (mean+/-SD creatinine clearance (ml/min)) were seen between patients with unilateral (32. 1+/-18.9, n=36) or bilateral (31.7+/-20.9, n=27) disease, or between sub-groups with RAS <60% (28.3+/-13.9, n=15), unilateral RAS >60% (38.9+/-24.6, n=12), bilateral RAS >60% (36.3+/-20.4, n=6) or unilateral RAO (30.3+/-17.7, n=28), and mean average renal size similarly did not differ between the sub-groups. No correlation existed between residual patency and creatinine clearance (r=0.015); mean+/-SD renal function was almost identical in the four patency sub-groups, and average renal size mirrored this pattern. Mean 24-h urinary protein excretion was similar for the four groups, but patients with minimal ARVD had significantly less comorbid vascular disease. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the severity of proximal renal artery lesions is often unrelated to the severity of renal dysfunction in patients with ARVD. Associated renal parenchymal damage is the more probable arbiter of renal dysfunction, and this should be considered when revascularization procedures are contemplated.     

Increased serum concentrations of pro-gastrin-releasing peptide in patients with renal dysfunction

BACKGROUND: Gastrin-releasing peptide has a prominent role as a tumour markerin the diagnosis of small-cell lung carcinoma. This study wasdesigned to assess the validity of a newly developed enzyme-linkedimmunosorbent assay (ELISA) for pro-gastrin-releasing peptidein patients with renal and systemic diseases. METHODS: Pro-gastrin-releasing peptide concentrations in sera from normalsubjects and patients with small-cell lung carcinoma, diabetesmellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus,chronic glomerulonephritis, or undialysed or dialysed chronicrenal failure were measured with the TND-4 Kit, a newly developedELISA for pro-gastrin-releasing peptide. RESULTS: All of the patients with normal renal function, whether theyhad diabetes mellitus (n=16), rheumatoid arthritis (n=10), systemiclupus erythematosus (n=12) or chronic glomerulonephritis (n=14),had serum pro-gastrin-releasing peptide concentrations lessthan 46 ng/l, the upper limit in normal subjects. In contrast,14 of 16 patients (88%) with small-cell lung carcinoma, whohad normal renal function, and 25 of 26 (96%) patients withchronic renal failure on haemodialysis had serum pro-gastrin-releasingpeptide concentrations greater than 46 ng/l. The highest serumpro-gastrin-releasing peptide levels in patients with chronicrenal failure, before and after initiating haemodialysis were183 and 290 ng/l respectively. Ten of 16 (63%) small-cell lungcarcinoma patients had serum pro-gastrin-releasing peptide concentrationsgreater than 290 ng/l, the highest level in haemodialysed patients.Serum pro-gastrin-releasing peptide concentrations were alsoelevated in patients with chronic glomerulonephritis or diabetesmellitus when their serum creatinine concentrations were greaterthan 120 µmol/l. And, there was a significant correlation,y=23.5+0.15x(n=22, r=0.82, P<0.001), between serum pro-gastrin-releasingpeptide (y, in ng/l) and serum creatinine (x, in µmol/l)concentrations in those patients with renal dysfunction. Thecorrelation between serum pro-gastrin-releasing peptide andserum urea nitrogen concentrations was likewise significant. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of patients as to their renal functional statemay be mandatory when serum pro-gastrin-releasing peptide levelsare to be applied as one of the diagnostic tools for small-celllung carcinoma or as a marker monitoring their clinical courses.     

Estimating the concentration of urea and creatinine in the human serum of normal and dialysis patients through Raman spectroscopy

Urea and creatinine are commonly used as biomarkers of renal function. Abnormal concentrations of these biomarkers are indicative of pathological processes such as renal failure. This study aimed to develop a model based on Raman spectroscopy to estimate the concentration values of urea and creatinine in human serum. Blood sera from 55 clinically normal subjects and 47 patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing dialysis were collected, and concentrations of urea and creatinine were determined by spectrophotometric methods. A Raman spectrum was obtained with a high-resolution dispersive Raman spectrometer (830 nm). A spectral model was developed based on partial least squares (PLS), where the concentrations of urea and creatinine were correlated with the Raman features. Principal components analysis (PCA) was used to discriminate dialysis patients from normal subjects. The PLS model showed r?=?0.97 and r?=?0.93 for urea and creatinine, respectively. The root mean square errors of cross-validation (RMSECV) for the model were 17.6 and 1.94 mg/dL, respectively. PCA showed high discrimination between dialysis and normality (95 % accuracy). The Raman technique was able to determine the concentrations with low error and to discriminate dialysis from normal subjects, consistent with a rapid and low-cost test.     

Factors related to renal dysfunction after liver transplantation in patients with normal preoperative function

OBJECTIVE: To determine perioperative factors related to postoperative renal dysfunction in patients receiving liver transplants who had normal renal function before surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the cases of 189 consecutive patients. Patients with hepatorenal syndrome and previously diagnosed renal insufficiency were excluded, as were patients undergoing a second transplant operation. Postoperative renal dysfunction was diagnosed when creatinine levels exceeded 1.5 mg x dL(-1) in the first postoperative week. Multivariate analysis of preoperative variables (patient characteristics; Child-Pugh score; status with the United Network for Organ Sharing; and sodium, coagulation, hemoglobin, and creatinine levels); intraoperative variables (blood product units required, duration of surgery, reperfusion syndrome, surgical technique, and crystalloids required); and postoperative variables (hemodialysis or filtration, reoperation, mortality, creatinine levels at 6 and 12 months). RESULTS: One hundred fifty patients with normal kidney function were included. Postoperative renal dysfunction developed in 45 (30%). Differences between patients with and without postoperative renal dysfunction were found for weight; sex; Child-Pugh score; blood transfusion requirements (mean [SD] of 2.36 [2.4] units of packed red cells in the group of patients with renal dysfunction vs 1.3 [1.8] in the patients with normal function); and reperfusion syndrome (26 [66.7%] patients with renal dysfunction and 35 [21.5%] without). The last 2 variables continued to be significantly correlated with renal dysfunction in the multivariate analysis with a relative risk of 1.25, (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.55) for units of blood transfusion and 2.41 (95% CI, 1.04-5.57) for reperfusion syndrome. Renal replacement therapy was used in 4 patients (2.7%). Mortality rates were similar. At 6 and 12 months, 26 (17.3%) and 18 (12%) patients had renal dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Acute renal dysfunction is a frequent complication following a liver transplant and it is associated with transfusion of more units of blood products even when the average transfusion amount is not large.