Cisplatin, etoposide, and paclitaxel in the treatment of patients with extensive small-cell lung carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The combination of cisplatin, etoposide, and paclitaxel was studied in patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer in a phase I component followed by a phase II trial to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), characterize toxicity, and estimate response and median survival rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients were treated between October 1993 and April 1997. Doses for the initial cohort were cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1, etoposide 80 mg/m(2)/d on days 1 to 3, and paclitaxel 130 mg/m(2) on day 1 over 3 hours. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. The MTD was reached in the first six patients. In these six patients and in the next 35 patients, who were entered onto the phase II trial, response and survival were estimated. RESULTS: At the initial dose level, one of six patients developed febrile neutropenia, and five of six achieved targeted neutropenia (nadir absolute granulocyte count, 100 to 1,000/microL) without any other dose-limiting toxicity, defining this level as the MTD. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 88 (47%) of 188 total courses administered at or less than the MTD. Neutropenia was associated with fever in only 17 (9%) of 188 courses, but two patients experienced neutropenic sepsis that was fatal. Nonhematologic toxicity greater than grade 2 was observed in 10 (5%) of 188 total courses, with fatigue, peripheral neuropathy, and nausea/vomiting most common. The overall objective response rate was 90% of 38 assessable patients: six complete responses (16%) and 28 partial responses(74%). Median progression-free and overall survival durations were 31 and 47 weeks, respectively. CONCLUSION: The combination of cisplatin, etoposide, and paclitaxel produced response and survival rates similar to those of other combinations and was well tolerated.     

Phase I study of paclitaxel and oral etoposide in previously untreated non-small-cell and extensive small-cell lung cancer

Purpose: This phase I study of paclitaxel and oral etoposide was performedto determine the safety of the combination in patients with advanced lungcancer who had received no prior chemotherapy, and to identify a dose forphase II testing.Patients and methods: Patients with locally advanced or metastaticnon-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or extensive small-cell lung cancer (SCLC),who had received no prior chemotherapy were treated with intravenouspaclitaxel given as a three hour infusion (starting dose 100mg/m²) and oral etoposide, 100 mg daily for five days. Twoschedules of administration were used with the paclitaxel given on day 1(schedule A) or day 5 (schedule B) of a 21 day cycle.Results: Forty-nine patients were entered on the study, four of whom hadSCLC. All patients were evaluable for toxicity. The maximum tolerated dose waspaclitaxel 200 mg/m² on day 1, in combination with oraletoposide 100 mg daily on days 1 to 5 (schedule A). The dose limitingtoxicities were mucositis, myalgia, diarrhoea, and paraesthesiae. Usingschedule B, myelosuppression, with febrile neutropenia was dose limiting ata paclitaxel dose of 160 mg/m². Amongst the 45 patients withNSCLC there were three complete and eight partial responses (24%;95% CI 13%–40%), while there was one completeresponse in the four patients with SCLC.Conclusion: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m² on day 1, with oraletoposide 100 mg daily on days 1 to 5 can be administered safely, and is therecommended dose for phase II studies.     

Phase III study of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide compared with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with extensive disease small-cell lung cancer

The progression-free survival (PFS) of cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/etoposide (CDE) and carboplatin/paclitaxel (CP) was compared in chemonaive patients with extensive disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC). A total of 203 patients were randomised to three-weekly CDE (n=102) or CP (n=101) for five cycles. Tumour response rates in CDE and CP were 60% and 61%. PFS of CP was 5.2 months, PFS of CDE 4.9 months (p=0.60). The major difference in toxicity between CDE and CP was grade 4 leukocytopaenia in 64% and 9% of the patients (p<0.0001), leading to febrile neutropaenia in 30% and 4% of the patients (p<0.0001), respectively. This was the reason for differences in the total number of hospital admissions (63 for CDE and 40 for CP, p=0.0025). This study failed to demonstrate any benefit in PFS with CP compared with CDE. CP was associated with significantly less haematological toxicity, leading to 37% less hospital admissions for febrile neutropaenia.     

Epirubicin/paclitaxel/etoposide in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a phase I-II study

The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility and toxicity of escalating doses of epirubicin and paclitaxel plus fixed dose of etoposide and to define the activity of the triplet in extensive disease small-cell lung cancer. Thirteen patients entered the phase I study: the maximum tolerated doses were epirubicin (EpiDX) 90 mg m-2 and paclitaxel (P) 175 mg m-2 with febrile neutropenia as dose-limiting toxicity. The recommended schedule for this regimen for the phase II study was EpiDX 75 mg m-2, P 175 mg m-2, etoposide (E) 100 mg m-2 intravenous (fixed dose) days 1-3 with courses repeated every 21 days. The prophylactic use of colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) was not allowed. Twenty patients entered the phase II trial: median age was 61 years (range 50-70), median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 (0-2); nine patients had visceral disease and 17 had more than two metastatic sites. A total of 100 courses were administered with a median of 5 (range 1-6) per patients. Main toxicity (NCI-CTC) was myelosuppression: neutropenia grades 3 and 4 in 16 and 35% of the courses, respectively. Seven episodes of febrile neutropenia were documented and one patient required hospital admission. Nonhaematological toxicity was moderate. Seven out of 19 evaluable patients achieved a complete response (37%), nine patients (47.3%) a partial response with an overall response rate of 84.2% (95% confidence interval=60.4-96.6). In this poor prognostic population of patients the triplet epirubicin/paclitaxel/etoposide showed high antitumour activity with mild nonhaematological side effects. The use of CSFs should be able to improve the haematological profile.     

Determining carboplatin/etoposide dosage in extensive stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

In order to define the maximum tolerance level of combined carboplatin/etoposide dosage, patients with extensive stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) were treated with a fixed dose of carboplatin (300 mg/m2 iv on day 1) and escalating doses of etoposide starting with 80 mg/m2 iv on days 1-3. Five patients were given this starting and every following dose level. The daily dose of etoposide was increased in increments of 20 mg/m2 iv until severe myelosuppression occurred in 3 of 5 patients. Leuko- or thrombocytopenia WHO grade 3 or 4 occurred in 0/5 of the patients at the dose levels of 80 and 100 mg/m2, in 1/4 of the patients at the level of 120 mg/m2, in 2/5 of the patients at a level of 140 mg/m2, and 3/5 patients at a level of 160 mg/m2. Thus, increase in dosage was stopped at an etoposide dose of 160 mg/m2. Other side effects were mild and consisted predominantly of nausea and vomiting in 14/25 of the patients. The overall response rate was 40% with a 12% complete remission rate, median survival was 9.3 months and median progression-free survival totalled 4.3 months. These results indicate that combined carboplatin/etoposide is a well tolerated regimen in extensive-stage SCLC, with response rates comparable to those of other standard protocols. Using treatment intervals of 4 weeks the recommended dose of etoposide in combination with 300 mg/m2 carboplatin was identified as 140 mg/m2 iv for 3 consecutive days.     

广泛期小细胞肺癌全身化疗与局部处理并重的治疗模式探讨

目的探讨广泛期小细胞肺癌多学科综合治疗模式。方法回顾性分析我院广泛期小细胞肺癌患者治疗资料和随访结果。结果纳入分析的49例患者,男女比例为4.4:1,年龄平均61.47±9.738岁(38～83岁)。转移部位以肝脏、骨、颅内最多见,以化疗为主要治疗手段,辅以转移部位的局部治疗。有近1/3的患者接受了三线及以上治疗,每一线治疗中又有1/3～1/2的患者接受了放疗、伽马刀、X刀、动脉灌注等局部治疗。49例患者10例至今存活,36例死亡,3例失访。1年、2年及5年生存率为64%、35%和14%,其中局限期进展到广泛期患者和诊断时即为广泛期患者的中位生存期有统计学差异(22个月vs.12个月,P=0.016)。结论广泛期小细胞肺癌患者经多线化疗和综合治疗,耐受性良好,可能改善预后,局限期进展后进入广泛期患者治疗后生存优于起病即为广泛期患者。     

Outpatient treatment with epirubicin and oral etoposide in patients with small-cell lung cancer.

To assess the efficacy and toxicity of an outpatient combination chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), we treated 70 consecutive patients with epirubicin 80 mg m(-2) i.v. on day 1 and etoposide 200 mg o.d. p.o. on days 1-4 (EE) at 3-weekly intervals. The median age of patients was 64 years (range 39-84). The male-female ratio was 42:28 and 35 (50%) had metastatic disease. Fifty-seven patients were evaluable for response. The overall response rate was 64.4%, including 14 (23.7%) complete responses and 24 (40.7%) partial responses. Median time to progression was 7 months in responders and 8 months in patients with limited disease. The median survival in patients with limited disease was 10.5 months (range 0.5-70 +) and 7 months (range 0.5-24) in those with extensive disease. Improvement of symptoms occurred in 79% of patients with shortness of breath, 80% with cough, 81% with haemoptysis and 68% with pain. In 19 patients an increase in body weight was noted. Major (WHO grade 3/4) toxicities were neutropenia in 13 (18.5%) patients, alopecia in 33 (47.1%) patients, mucositis in 15 (21.4%) patients, anorexia in eight patients (11.4%), nausea and vomiting in six patients (8.5%) and diarrhoea in 4 (5.7%) patients. In conclusion, EE is an active and well-tolerated outpatient regimen in the treatment of SCLC. The survival data in this unselected group of patients were disappointing and the possible explanations for this are discussed.     

Carboplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide as intensive chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer

Thirty-two previously untreated, fit patients with small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) were treated with an intensive combination chemotherapy regimen, with the aim of prolonging survival, as follows: carboplatin 400 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) day 1, ifosfamide 5 g/m2 IV day 1 in a 24-hour infusion with mesna, and etoposide 100 mg/m2 IV days 1 to 3, repeating at 28-day intervals for six courses. Limited-disease (LD) patients were given concurrent hyperfractionated radiotherapy for the first two courses, and all patients achieving a complete remission (CR) were offered prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI). For 18 LD patients, the overall response was 94% with 72% CRs. For 14 extensive-disease (ED) patients the overall response was 100% with 29% CRs. Median response duration for LD patients was 11.5 months and for ED patients 7.5 months. Median survival for LD patients was 19 months with a predicted 24% 2-year survival and for ED patients 9.5 months with a predicted 14% 2-year survival. Hematologic toxicity was severe with 100% developing World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3-4 neutropenia and 94% WHO grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia during treatment. Seventy-two percent of patients required a dose reduction at some stage during treatment because of neutropenic infection or thrombocytopenia requiring platelet transfusions. Despite very high response rates, this intensive regimen achieves survival results only modestly better, if at all, than those reported for less toxic conventional regimens.     

The impact of dose per cycle of etoposide and cisplatin on outcomes in patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer

Etoposide/cisplatin is the standard chemotherapy regimen used in the United States for the treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). A wide variety of dose and schedules have been employed when managing these patients. We conducted an analysis of the phase II/III trials of etoposide/cisplatin in the past 20 years to determine whether the dose and cycle of either drug affected outcomes in patients with extensive SCLC. We identified 15 phase I/II studies, which included 1419 patients. Etoposide doses per cycle ranged from 180 mg/m(2) to 510 mg/m(2) and cisplatin doses per cycle ranged from 80 mg/m2 to 280 mg/m(2). With logistic regression analysis, we found that increasing doses of etoposide resulted in increased complete response rates (P = 0.01) but had no impact on overall response rates. Cisplatin dose per cycle had no influence on complete or overall response. With linear regression analysis, we were unable to find a relationship between survival and dose per cycle of etoposide or cisplatin. Variations in the administration of this regimen had no impact on outcomes in patients with extensive SCLC.     

Vincristine and etoposide: An effective chemotherapy regimen with reduced toxicity in extensive small-cell lung cancer

Chemotherapy prolongs survival of patients with small-cell lung cancer, but very few are cured, and the treatment is unpleasant. Thirty patients, 28 with advanced disease, were treated with etoposide 250 mg/m² orally, daily for 5 days, plus vincristine 2 mg intravenously on the first day, the cycle being repeated 3-weekly, to a maximum of 6. There was a response rate of 70%, a median survival of 249 days, and an 11% 2-year survival. Symptomatic side-effects were less pronounced than with most other regimens of comparable efficacy.     

Phase II study of topotecan and paclitaxel for patients with previously untreated extensive stage small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: This phase II study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination of paclitaxel and topotecan for patients with extensive stage small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated ED-SCLC patients with Eastern Coperative Oncology Group performance status <2 were eligible. Treatment consisted of topotecan 1 mg/m2 (first three patients received 1.25 mg/m2), on days 1-5, and paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 over 24 h on day 5, every 4 weeks. Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was administered to all patients. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients received a median of four cycles of chemotherapy. Grade 4 anemia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 13, 31 and 18 patients, respectively. Thirty episodes of febrile neutropenia occurred in 22 patients. Grade 3 fatigue, esophagitis, stomatitis and hypotension occurred in one patient each. Of 26 patients eligible for response evaluation, there were six complete and 12 partial responses (overall response rate 69%). The median survival was 54 weeks. The 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates were 50%, 10% and 3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of topotecan and paclitaxel is active as initial therapy in SCLC, but the efficacy is similar to 'standard therapy'. This combination was associated with a high incidence of myelosuppression and febrile neutropenia, at the doses evaluated.     

A phase I study of gemcitabine/cisplatin/etoposide in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: To define the maximum tolerated dose and toxicity of combined cisplatin, etoposide, and gemcitabine in patients with small-cell lung cancer. METHODS: We undertook a phase I study in patients with either extensive small-cell lung cancer with or without prior chemotherapy, or limited disease who had progressed or recurred despite prior treatment. Patients received cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, etoposide 50-100 mg/m2 i.v. day 1 followed by oral administration of 50-100 mg/m2 days 2 5, and gemcitabine at either 800 or 1000 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8, on a 3 weekly cycle. RESULTS: We treated 20 patients, 14 at the 800 mg/m2 gemcitabine dose level, and six at the 1000 mg/m2 dose level. The protocol initially used an etoposide dose of 100 mg/m2 etoposide daily (i.v. day 1 and orally days 2-5), but the first two patients died of septic complications. With reduction of the etoposide dose to 50 mg/m2 daily x 5, the regimen was well tolerated. At this etoposide dose, neutropenia, mucositis, and gastrointestinal toxicity occurred in one patient at each of the two gemcitabine dose levels. In addition, one patient receiving gemcitabine at the 1000 mg/m2 level experienced a possible allergic reaction. The overall response rate was 54%. Patients on gemcitabine at the 800 mg/m2 level who had not received prior chemotherapy had the highest response rate, at 75%. CONCLUSION: The recommended phase II doses for this regimen are cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, etoposide 50 mg/m2 i.v. day 1 and orally days 2-5, and gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8. Future trials should further examine the optimal relative doses and schedule of gemcitabine and etoposide.     

Carboplatin plus paclitaxel in extensive small cell lung cancer: a multicentre phase 2 study

A multicentre phase 2 trial (single-stage design) was undertaken to test the efficacy and toxicity of carboplatin (AUC 6 according to Calvert) plus paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)3-h infusion) every 4 weeks in the first line treatment of patients affected by extensive small cell lung cancer. The primary end-point of the trial was the objective response rate. 31 objective responses among 50 patients were considered necessary to proceed to a phase 3 trial. 48 patients were enrolled (median age 59 years). Treatment was very well tolerated. 3 patients (6.2%) had a complete response and 23 (47.9%) a partial response, for an overall response rate of 54.2% (95% CI: 39.2-68.6). Median time to progression was 5.7 months (95% CI: 5.2-6.2). Median survival was 9.6 months (95% CI: 7.2-14.6), with a median follow-up time of alive patients of 12 months. At 1 year, the probability of being progression-free or alive was 0.16 and 0.43, respectively. In conclusion, carboplatin plus paclitaxel as given in the present study is very well tolerated but not sufficiently active to warrant phase 3 comparison with standard chemotherapy regimens.     

Etoposide in the treatment of elderly/poor-prognosis patients with small-cell lung cancer

Survival rates for cancer have improved in recent decades, specifically for younger patients. However for those over 65, who account for over half of all cancer patients, mortality rates remain poor. In those with small-cell lung cancer the achievement of cure is possible in only a minority (5–10%). For the elderly and those with extensive disease we have found that the use of oral etoposide offers similar survival rates to more intensive regimens, with minimal side effects and hospitalisation. Thus the expansion of the elderly population mandates for more specific chemotherapeutic approaches in this group.Paper presented at the Topoisomerase Inhibitors Conference, University of Maryland Cancer Center, 27–30 October 1993, Monterey, California, USA. Supported in part by Bristol Myers Oncology Division