Successful platelet recovery after the second eradication of Helicobacter pylori with metronidazole in two patients with chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura

There are many reports on the efficacy of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapy in patients with H. pylori-positive chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). We administrated metronidazole (MNZ), amoxicillin (AMPC), and a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) as the second eradication therapy for two patients who failed in the first eradication therapy consisting of PPI, AMPC, and clarithromycin (CAM). Successful eradication and the rapid recovery of platelet counts within one month were achieved in both patients. Recently, H. pylori eradication is considered as the first-line therapy for H. pylori-positive chronic ITP patients. In Japan, the PPI + AMPC + CAM regimen is recognized as the standard eradication therapy for H. pylori. However, the PPI + AMPC + MNZ regimen is also useful for eradication and should be tried as the re-treatment regimen after failure of the first-line CAM-containing regimen.     

Efficacy of low-dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori following combination PPI/AC therapy in Japan

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In Japan, eradication regimens consisting of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) + amoxicillin (AMPC) + clarithromycin (CAM) (PPI/AC) for 1 week have been conducted. In the present study, we assessed the eradication rates following treatment with low doses of various PPIs. METHODOLOGY: 135 patients were divided randomly into one of three 7-day regimens: (i) omeprazole (OPZ) 20 mg/day + AMPC 1500 mg/day + CAM 600 mg/day (OAC); (ii) lansoprazole (LPZ) 30 mg + AMPC 1500 mg/day + CAM 600 mg/day (LAC); and (iii) rabeprazole (RPZ) 10mg/day + AMPC 1500 mg/ day + CAM 600 mg/day (RAC). The genetic polymorphism of CYP2C19 was also examined. RESULTS: The eradication rates according to the treatment regimen were as follows: 69.9% (31/45) for OAC, 62.2% (28/45) for LAC, and 71.1% (32/45) for RPZ. No significant differences were found among the regimens. Moreover, eradication rates, according to CYP2C19 phenotype (homozygous extensive metabolizer (EM), heterozygous EM, and poor metabolizer) were: 68.6% (35/51), 77.4% (41/53), and 82.4% (14/17), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In PPI/AC therapy, the eradication rate for each low-dose PPI was 60-70%, which is low. Based on previous reports, it is considered that doses greater than 40 mg/day OPZ, 60 mg/day LPZ, and 20 mg/day RPZ are required.     

Multi-center randomized controlled study to establish the standard third-line regimen for Helicobacter pylori eradication in Japan

Backgrounds

The present study sought to establish a standard third-line eradication regimen for Helicobacter pylori in Japan.

Methods

Subjects were 204 patients with H. pylori infection in whom the standard Japanese first- and second-line eradication therapies had proven unsuccessful. Patients were randomly assigned to one of the following third-line eradication therapy groups: (1) LA group: lansoprazole (LPZ) 30 mg 4 times a day (qid) + amoxicillin (AMPC) 500 mg qid for two weeks; (2) LAL group: LPZ 30 mg twice a day (bid) + AMPC 750 mg bid + levofloxacin (LVFX) 300 mg bid for one week; (3) LAS group: LPZ 30 mg bid + AMPC 750 mg bid + sitafloxacin (STFX) 100 mg bid for one week. Patients for whom these therapies failed underwent a crossover fourth-line eradication regimen. Drug sensitivity was also tested for AMPC, clarithromycin (CAM), MNZ, LVFX, and STFX.

Results

Drug resistance rates prior to third-line eradication therapy were 86.4 % for CAM, 71.3 % for MNZ, 57.0 % for LVFX, 8.2 % for AMPC, and 7.7 % for STFX. Intention-to-treat analysis of third-line eradication therapy eradication rates showed a significantly higher rate in the LAS group (70.0 %) compared with the LA group (54.3 %; p < 0.05) and the LAL group (43.1 %; p < 0.001). The significantly lower rate in the LAL group than the LAS group was caused by bacterial resistance to LVFX.

Conclusions

The findings suggest that triple therapy with PPI, AMPC, and STFX for one week would be an effective standard third-line eradication regimen for H. pylori in Japan.     

Multiple-antibiotic-resistant Helicobacter pylori infection eradicated with a tailor-made quadruple therapy

In 2008, a 44-year-old woman with mild epigastralgia diagnosed as having Helicobacter pylori-positive chronic gastritis without peptic ulcer underwent eradication therapy with lansoprazole (LPZ), amoxicillin (AMPC) and clarithromycin (CAM) for 7 days, but it failed, so treatment with rabeprazole, AMPC, and metronidazole (MNZ) for another 7 days was given, but it also failed. She was then prescribed a modified, 14-day sequential therapy of LPZ and AMPC with an increased dose of CAM followed by MNZ supplement, but the infection was still not eradicated. The H. pylori was cultured and examined for antibiotic susceptibility with the agar dilution method and was found to be resistant to CAM, MNZ, and levofloxacin, and non-sensitive to AMPC, namely multiple-antibiotic-resistant, although sensitive to minocycline. The CYP2C19 genotype of the patient was an extensive metabolizer (G681A: G/A, G636A: G/G). In 2010, she gave informed consent for a 14-day, tailor-made, modified classical (or modified high-dose PPI + AMPC) quadruple therapy comprising 30 mg LPZ, 500 mg AMPC and 500 mg bismuth subnitrate, qid, and 100 mg minocycline, bid. Two months later, her urea breath test was negative. Histology and bacterial culture were still negative 1 year after the therapy. She did not have any adverse events during or after the novel therapy, nor did she feel any further epigastralgia.     

Results of triple eradication therapy in Japanese children: a retrospective multicenter study

Background Large-scale clinical trials in children are lacking concerning Helicobacter pylori eradication therapies. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapies in Japanese children.Methods This was a retrospective analysis of the first- and second-line PPI-based triple therapies from pediatric gastrointestinal units between 1996 and 2003. Data collected included doses and duration of regimens, drug compliance, success or failure of eradication, ulcer healing, and symptom response of those with dyspepsia and no ulcers. The results of antibiotic susceptibility tests were also reported in cases where these were performed.Results A total of 149 pediatric patients (mean age, 12.6 years) were studied, including 123 patients who received first-line therapy: 115 received a PPI plus amoxicillin and clarithromycin (PAC) and 8 received a PPI plus amoxicillin and metronidazole (PAM). Overall eradication rates of the first-line PAC and PAM therapies were 77.4% and 87.5%, respectively (P = 0.68). All 14 patients with failed PAC therapy received the second-line PAM regimen, resulting in an eradication rate of 100%. Mild side effects were reported only in PAC regimens (13.8%). Primary resistance to amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and metronidazole was detected in 0%, 34.7%, and 12.5% of the strains, respectively. The PAC regimen showed a high eradication rate for clarithromycin-susceptible strains (91.7%), but was relatively ineffective for resistant strains (40.0%) (P < 0.01). Eradication of H. pylori was associated with ulcer healing and symptomatic improvement among those with gastritis only (both; P < 0.001). Among 17 patients with iron-deficiency anemia, post-treatment hemoglobin levels were higher than the pretreatment levels (P < 0.001).Conclusions The PAC regimen is effective in children. Clarithromycin resistance is associated with eradication failure. Metronidazole is a good substitute for clarithromycin as the second-line option for children.     

Generalization of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy and its future in Japan

After official acceptance of eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori infected peptic ulcer disease in 2000, this treatment has been generalized as ulcer therapy in Japan. In 2003 the consensus statement of the Japanese Society for Helicobacter Research (JSHR) for Helicobacter pylori infection was presented. According to this statement MALT lymphoma was recommended to treat H. pylori infection because of the efficacy of its out come. Atrophic gastritis was also advised to treat H. pylori infection for the purpose of preventing gastric cancer development. The extra alimentary disease such as idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura was still under evaluation. In diagnostic method the importance of drug susceptibility test is rising because of the increase of drug resistant H. pylori strain in Japan. The false positive case of urea breath test, the accuracy of new Japanese original serology tests and the stool antigen test are also under investigation. The standard regimen of H. pylori eradication therapy in Japan is proton pomp inhibitor (PPI) + amoxicilin (AMPC) + clarithromycin (CAM). The problem of this regimen is the decrease of eradication rate. The reason of this trend might be increase of CAM resistant strain. JSHR recommended a rescue regimen as PPI + AMPC + metronidazole for the patient whose first eradication therapy was unsuccessful result. The eradication of this second line regimen was reported as about 90%.     

Comparison of three different second-line quadruple therapies including bismuth subcitrate in Turkish patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia who failed to eradicate Helicobacter pylori with a 14-day standard first-line therapy

Background and Aim: Many studies have reported poor results with standard first‐line treatment for Helicobacter pylori. Second‐line regimens that may overcome bacterial resistance can minimize side‐effects and optimize compliance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and bismuth subcitrate‐based quadruple therapy, after failure of a PPI plus clarithromycin and amoxicillin as first‐line therapy. Methods: Patients who failed to eradicate the infection after initial therapy were randomly separated into three groups. The first group received lansoprazole, bismuth subcitrate, metronidazole and amoxicillin (LBMA); in the second group metronidazole was replaced by tetracycline (LBTA); and the third group was given metronidazole and tetracycline in addition to same doses of lansoprazole and bismuth subcitrate (LBMT). Results: In the LBMA group, the eradication rate was 74.7% and was significantly related to sex, with no relationship to age. In the LBTA group the eradication rate was 81.5% with similar rates in males and females. No relation to sex or age was observed. In the LBMT group the eradication rate was 82.1% with no difference between women and men and it was not related to age, either. Eradication rates in study groups were similar (P > 0.05). Conclusion: A‐14‐day regimen of lansoprazole, bismuth subcitrate and antibiotic pairs, tetracycline–amoxicillin and tetracycline–metronidazole, is an effective quadruple therapy after one failed course of standard triple therapy. The evaluation of tolerability of and compliance with quadruple therapy needs further studies.     

Strategy for retreatment of therapeutic failure of eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND AND AIM: A proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapy consisting of a PPI, amoxicillin (A) and clarithromycin (C) or metronidazole (M) provides an eradication rate ranging from 80 to 90%. However, there have been few controlled studies with regard to the most effective regimen to re-treat patients after failure of the first-line therapy. Accordingly, we retrospectively reviewed our experiences and compared regimens with different combinations of antimicrobials to determine the optimal retreatment regimen. METHODS: Out of 133 patients who had received second-line therapy after failure of first-line PPI/AC therapy, we selected, for review, patients who took the prescribed drugs for first-line therapy equal to, or more than 80%. As a result, data on 114 patients (83 males and 31 females; mean age 49.1 +/- 13.0 years; peptic ulcer n = 89; non-ulcer dyspepsia, n = 25) were eligible for evaluation. They had either repeated the PPI/AC regimen (n = 34; 5-14 days), or had been administered the PPI/AM regimen (n = 80; 10 days). The cure rates of the two regimens were compared. RESULTS: The eradication rates for second-line therapy with the PPI/AC regimen versus the PPI/AM regimen were 52.9% (95% CI, 35-70) versus 81.3% (95% CI, 71-89) by intention-to-treat analysis (P < 0.01), and 62.1% (95% CI, 42-79) versus 91.4% (95% CI, 81-97) by per-protocol analysis (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The eradication rate for the PPI/AM retreatment regimen was significantly higher than for the repeated PPI/AC regimen, suggesting that a 10-day PPI/AM regimen can be recommended as a retreatment regimen for patients who had first-line eradication therapy by PPI/AC regimens.     

Helicobacter pylori eradication with either 7-day or 10-day triple therapies, and with a 10-day sequential regimen.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori eradication rates achieved by standard seven-day triple therapies are decreasing in several countries, while a novel 10-day sequential regimen has achieved a very high success rate. A longer 10-day triple therapy, similar to the sequential regimen, was tested to see whether it could achieve a better infection cure rate. METHODS: Patients with nonulcer dyspepsia and H pylori infection were randomly assigned to one of the following three therapies: esomeprazole 20 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and amoxycillin 1 g for seven days or 10 days, or a 10-day sequential regimen including esomeprazole 20 mg plus amoxycillin 1 g for five days and esomeprazole 20 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and tinidazole 500 mg for the remaining five days. All drugs were given twice daily. H pylori eradication was checked four to six weeks after treatment by using a 13C-urea breath test. RESULTS: Overall, 213 patients were enrolled. H pylori eradication was achieved in 75.7% and 77.9%, in 81.7% and 84.1%, and in 94.4% and 97.1% of patients following seven-day or 10-day triple therapy and the 10-day sequential regimen, at intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses, respectively. The eradication rate following the sequential regimen was higher than either seven-day (P=0.002) or 10-day triple therapy (P=0.02), while no significant difference emerged between the latter two regimens (P=0.6). CONCLUSIONS: The 10-day sequential regimen was significantly more effective than both triple regimens, while 10-day triple therapy failed to significantly increase the H pylori eradication rate achieved by the standard seven-day regimen.     

Evaluation of the efficacy of an Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura patients]

The relationship between Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and gastric diseases (e.g. peptic ulcer, MALT lymphoma, and stomach cancer) has been widely accepted. Recent studies have also suggested an association between H. pylori infection and idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). In this study, an H. pylori eradication treatment was administered to 20 ITP patients and elucidated for its effectiveness. Among those 20 patients, H. pylori infection was confirmed in 17 (85%) through a C14 urea breath test, a rapid urease test, or a culture examination of a biopsied sample obtained by gastrointestinal endoscopy. Although the other 3 were negative to H. pylori, the H. pylori eradication treatment was also attempted because no other effective treatments had been established at the time of this study. In the H. pylori eradication treatment, lansoprazole (LPZ) 60 mg bid, amoxicillin (AMPC) 1500 mg bid, and clarithromycin (CAM) 400 mg bid were given to each patient for 7 days. For 4 cases, CAM was replaced with metronidazole (MNZ) 750 mg bid. The patients whose H. pylori infection was not eradicated after the first treatment received the re-eradication treatment with LPZ 60 mg bid, AMPC 1500 mg bid, and MNZ 750 mg bid for 7 days. After the treatments, the success of eradicating H. pylori was confirmed in all 17 H. pylori positive patients. In addition, platelet recovery was obtained in 11/20 patients (55%), which included 2 H. pylori negative patients and 2 patients whose H. pylori eradication was not successful after the first treatment. No relationship was found between the eradication effectiveness and the following clinical parameters: age, gender, previous therapies, disease duration, presence of anti-nucleus antibody, endoscopic atrophic change in the stomach, or kinds of antibiotics used for the treatment. These results support the efficacy of an H. pylori eradication treatment for ITP patients. A noteworthy result of this study was that an increase of platelet count was observed not only in H. pylori positive ITP patients, but also in 2 out of 3 H. pylori negative ITP patients after H. pylori eradication. Further studies are required to elucidate the efficacy of H. pylori eradication therapy in the patients negative for H. pylori.     

Evaluation of triple and quadruple Helicobacter pylori eradication therapies in Iranian children: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials in children concerning Helicobacter pylori eradication treatments are scarce. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapy using PPI, amoxicillin and clarithromycin in Iranian children. We also evaluated the efficacy of quadruple therapy with PPI, metronidazole, amoxicilin and bismuth citrate in Iranian children. METHODS: This was a randomized clinical trial performed in Emam Khomeini Hospital between 2003 and 2004. Patients with confirmed H. pylori infection by histology were divided into two groups in a randomized 1:1 scheme: the triple regimen group (omeprazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin for 10 days) and the quadruple regimen group (omeprazole, amoxicillin, metronidazole and bismuth citrate for 10 days). The eradication was assessed by the C-urea breath test 4 weeks after the end of treatment and analyzed by per-protocol and intention-to-treat approaches. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-two patients (mean age 12.36+/-3.06 years) were entered into the study. Only 100 patients completed the study (50 patients in each regimen group). The eradication rates by triple therapy were 92% and 75.5% for the "per-protocol" and "intention-to-treat" approaches, respectively. In the quadruple regimen group, the eradication rates were 84% by the per-protocol approach and 68.8% in the intention-to-treat approach. Symptom responses to therapy were reported in all patients with successful eradication (88% of all patients). CONCLUSION: With regard to recent recommendations, we also suggest PPI, amoxicillin and clarithromycin triple therapy as a first-line eradication treatment, and quadruple therapies as a second-line option, in Iranian children.     

五种HP根除方案对高原部队HP感染的病人治疗效果的比较

为了筛选适合于高原部队防治由于 HP 感染所致的上消化道疾病的 HP 根除治疗方案,设计了5种不同的治疗方案,并对胃镜检查证实的140名 HP 阳性的患者进行随机分组治疗,治疗结束后4周采用(14)~C-尿素呼吸试验复查,溃疡患者胃镜复查并行 HP 快速尿素酶试验和病理检查。结果表明:以德诺为主的2号和3号四联方案Hp 根除率分别为92.23%和91.67%,但不良反应较多;4号方案(雷尼替丁150mg2/天,甲硝唑200mg4/天,呋喃唑酮100mg4/天)HP 根除率为83.33%,但与2号和3号四联方案比较并无显著差异(P>0.05),且不良反应少,依从性好,药品成本低。因此,根据我们的结果,4号方案是一种较为理想的并适合于高原基层部队的 HP 根除治疗方案,值得在临床推广应用。     

10天序贯疗法与标准三联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌感染荟萃分析

目的系统地评价10天序贯疗法能否获得比标准三联疗法更高的H．pylori根除率，以及两种方案之间发生副反应的差异。方法利用中英文检索词检索相关电子数据库，根据纳入标准入选了比较10天序贯疗法与标准三联疗法的幽门螺杆菌根除率的随机临床试验。提取患者基本资料、研究质量、H．pylori根除率和副作用的发生率等相关数据。针对于10天序贯疗法和7天或10天标准三联疗法的H．pylori根除率和副作用的发生率，计算相应的RR和95％可信区间。运用漏斗图评价出版偏倚。结果Meta分析纳入了10项随机对照研究，共2855例患者。10天序贯疗法明显优于7天或10天标准三联疗法，总的H．pylori根除率分别为93．5％、75．9％和79．4％，RR为1．23（95％CI=1．19—1．28）和1．16（95％CI：1．10—1．23）。无论是溃疡性消化不良患者还是非溃疡性消化不良患者，10天序贯疗法都能获得更高的H．pylori根除率，RR分别为1．16（95％CI=1．10—1．23）和1．26（95％CI=1．19—1．33）；针对克拉霉素耐药患者，10天序贯疗法的有效H．pylori根除率也高于标准三联疗法（75．9％vs32．7％），RR为2．18（95％CI=1．43—3．34）。然而两种方案副作用的发生率无明显差别（RR=1．00，95％CI=0．97—1．03）。结论10天序贯疗法明显优于7天或10天标准三联疗法,副作用无明显增加。     

奥美拉唑或兰索拉唑、阿莫西林、呋喃唑酮短程三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌

目的探索根除率较高、价廉、安全实用的HP根除方案.方法137例消化性溃疡或糜烂性胃窦炎患者,随机分为3组A组44例,以奥美拉唑20mg+克拉霉素250mg+替硝唑500mg每天2次,疗程7天,即Bazzoli方案;B组47例,以奥美拉唑20mg+阿莫西林1000mg+呋喃唑酮100mg,每天2次,疗程7天;C组46例,以兰索拉唑30mg每天1次,阿莫西林1000mg+呋喃唑酮100mg每天2次,疗程7天.活动期溃疡患者抗HP治疗后继服奥美拉唑20mg或兰索拉唑30mg,每天1次,3周.抗HP治疗结束1月后复查胃镜并检测HP.结果A、B、C3组的HP根除率分别为90.9%、87.2%和89.1%;活动期溃疡愈合率分别为100%、93.8%和100%;糜烂性胃窦炎愈合率分别为85.2%、79.2%和92.2%;副反应发生率分别为13.6%、6.4%和8.7%.各组间差异无显著性,P＞0.05.A、B、C3组每例抗HP所需费用分别为544.5元、309.0元和170.5元.结论方案B、C是2种新的、根除率较高、价廉、安全实用的HP根除方案.     

Randomized open trial for comparison of proton pump inhibitors in triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection in relation to CYP2C19 genotype

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Genetic polymorphism of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 influences the efficacy of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and amoxicillin. However, in triple therapy (PPI plus amoxicillin and clarithromycin), little is known about the impact of CYP2C19 polymorphism, or the use of rabeprazole, which is not well metabolized by CYP2C19. The efficacy of three PPI (omeprazole, lansoprazole, and rabeprazole) in a 1-week triple regimen were compared in relation to CYP2C19 polymorphism. METHOD: One hundred and eighty-three patients were randomized to receive one of the following regimens: amoxicillin 500 mg t.i.d., clarithromycin 200 mg t.i.d., and PPI (omeprazole 20 mg, lansoprazole 30 mg, or rabeprazole 10 mg) b.i.d. CYP2C19 polymorphism was analyzed by PCR restriction fragment length polymorphism. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat-based overall cure rates for omeprazole, lansoprazole or rabeprazole regimens were 83.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 69-89%), 86.7% (CI: 75-93%), and 76.6% (CI: 64-85%), respectively, without significant difference. The cure rate of the rabeprazole regimen (but not the lansoprazole or omeprazole regimens) tended to be correlated with CYP2C19 genotypes (P = 0.076). In patients with a homozygous extensive metabolizer genotype, the per protocol-based cure rate with rabeprazole (62.5%) was significantly lower than that with lansoprazole (90.0%; P = 0.038). CONCLUSION: The overall cure rate of 1-week triple therapy for H. pylori eradication was not significantly different between regimens with omeprazole, lansoprazole or rabeprazole, but the impact of CYP2C19 genetic polymorphism on the cure rate appeared to differ between these PPI.     

Efficacy of 1 week omeprazole or lansoprazole-amoxycillin-clarithromycin therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection in the Japanese population

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of curative therapy for Helicobacter pylori may vary according to the geographic region and patient population, thus the efficacy of each treatment regimen should be determined according to the specific patient population. However, there is no literature available concerning the efficacy of 1 week omeprazole-amoxycillin-clarithromycin (OAC) regimens for the cure of H. pylori infection in Japan. METHODS: Helicobacter pylori-positive patients (224) with peptic ulcer disease or non-ulcer dyspepsia were randomized to receive one of three different omeprazole or lansoprazole-amoxycillin-clarithromycin (PPI/AC) regimens for 7 days: (1) OAC 20 regimen (n = 76), omeprazole (OPZ) 20 mg daily, amoxycillin (AMOX) 500 mg t.d.s. and clarithromycin (CAM) 200 mg b.d.; (2) LAC 30 regimen (n = 73), Lansoprazole (LPZ) 30 mg daily, AMOX 500 mg t.d.s. and CAM 200 mg b.d.; and (3) OPZ 40 regimen (n = 75), OPZ 20 b.d., AMOX 500 mg t.d.s. and CAM 200 mg b.d. Cure of the infection was determined by the [13C]-urea breath test, 1 month after completion of the treatment. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat based cure rates for OAC 20, LAC 30 and OAC 40 regimens were 75.0% (95% CI, 64-84%), 82.2% (95%, CI 72-90), and 80.0% (95% CI, 69-88), respectively and per-protocol based cure rates of these regimens were 79.2% (95% CI, 68-88%), 83.3% (95%, CI 73-91), and 83.1% (95% CI, 72-91%), respectively. Adverse effects, which included diarrhoea, glossitis or skin rash, were reported by 26.1% of the patients. However, these were mild and did not affect compliance. CONCLUSION: One week PPI/AC regimens for H. pylori infection with smaller proton pump inhibitors and antimicrobial dosages compared to regimens used in Western countries were revealed to provide sufficient cure rate (more than 80% by ITT analysis) with mild adverse effects in the Japanese population.     

Is a Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker Truly Superior to Proton Pump Inhibitors in Terms of Helicobacter pylori Eradication?

Vonoprazan (VPZ), a new potassium-competitive acid blocker, has been approved and used for Helicobacter pylori eradication in Japan. To date, many studies, as well as several systematic reviews and meta-analyses (MAs), have compared VPZ-based 7-day triple therapy with proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based therapy. An MA of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing first-line VPZ- with PPI-based triple therapy, the latter featuring amoxicillin (AMPC) and clarithromycin (CAM), found that approximately 30% of patients hosted CAM-resistant H. pylori; however, the reliability was poor because of high heterogeneity and a risk of selection bias. VPZ-based triple therapy is superior to PPI-based triple therapy for patients with CAM-resistant H. pylori, but not for those with CAM-susceptible H. pylori. An MA of non-RCTs found that second-line VPZ-based triple therapies were slightly (~2.6%) better than PPI-based triple therapies (with AMPC and metronidazole). However, the reliability of that MA was also low because of selection bias, confounding variables and a risk of publication bias; in addition, it is difficult to generalize the results because of a lack of data on antibiotic resistance. VPZ-based triple therapy (involving AMPC and sitafloxacin) was more effective than PPI-based triple therapy in a third-line setting, but a confirmatory RCT is needed. Non-RCT studies indicated that VPZ-based triple therapy involving CAM and metronidazole may be promising. Any further RCTs must explore the antibiotic-resistance status when evaluating the possible superiority of a potassium-competitive acid blocker.     

Efficacy of quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication after failure of proton pump inhibitor‐based triple therapy in Singapore

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori eradication is the mainstay in the treatment of H. pylori‐associated peptic ulcer disease. Current standard eradication therapy consists of 1 week of treatment with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and two antibiotics selected from amoxicillin, metronidazole and clarithromycin. In this study we aimed to assess the efficacy of quadruple therapy consisting of a PPI, bismuth, tetra‐cycline and metronidazole in patients for whom initial H. pylori eradication using a triple therapy regimen consisting of a PPI, amoxicillin and clarithromycin was unsuccessful. METHODS: Consecutive patients with H. pylori‐associated peptic ulcer disease, in whom H. pylori with triple therapy had been unsuccessful, were included in the study. These patients had been treated with a regimen that included a PPI (standard dose twice daily), amoxicillin (1 g twice daily) and clarithro­mycin (500 mg twice daily) for 1 week during 1997?2001. Diagnosis of peptic ulcer disease was made at esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Helicobacter pylori infection was considered to be present on the basis of either a positive rapid urease test, positive histo­logical identification of H. pylori or both. Failure of initial H. pylori eradication was established with either a rapid urease test, a ¹³C urea breath test or histology. Quadruple therapy consisted of a PPI (standard dose twice daily), metronidazole (400 mg three times daily), tetracycline (500 mg four times daily) and bismuth subcitrate (240 mg twice daily). Failure of quadruple therapy was diagnosed on the basis of a positive ¹³C urea breath test. RESULTS: Fifty‐three patients received quadruple therapy. The median age was 52 years (range 20?74) and the male to female ratio was 42 : 11. On an intent‐to‐treat basis, the eradication rate was 69.8%, whereas on a per‐protocol basis, the eradication rate was 82.2%. CONCLUSION: We conclude that a 1‐week quadruple therapy regime consisting of a PPI, bismuth, tetracycline and metronidazole was effective in 82.2% of patients who experienced an unsuccessful initial H. pylori eradication attempt with PPI, amoxicillin and clarithromycin.     

First-line eradication of H pylori infection in Europe： A metaanalysis based on congress abstracts, 1997-2004

INTRODUCTIONNumerous treatment regimens have been tested for their efficacy in curing H pylori infection worldwide[1-3]. Meta-analysis has become a frequently used method for re-solving such uncertainties and obtaining sound data in evidence-based medicin…     

Concomitant therapy achieved the best eradication rate for Helicobacter pylori among various treatment strategies

AIM: To compare the Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori) eradication rate of clarithromycin-based triple therapy,metronidazole-based triple therapy,sequential therapy and concomitant therapy.METHODS: A total of 680 patients infected with H.pylori were divided into 4 groups and each group was treated with a different eradication therapy.Clarithromycin-based triple therapy was applied to the first group [rabeprazole,amoxicillin and clarithromycin(PAC) group: proton pump inhibitor(PPI),amoxicillin,clarithromycin],whereas the second group was treated with metronidazole-based triple therapy [rabeprazole,amoxicillin and metronidazole(PAM) group: PPI,amoxicillin,metronidazole].The third group was treated with rabeprazole and amoxicillin,followed by rabeprazole,clarithromycin and metronidazole(sequential group).The final group was simultaneously treated with rabeprazole,amoxicillin clarithromycin and metronidazole(concomitant therapy group).In the case of a failure to eradicate H.pylori,second-line quadruple and third-line eradication therapies were administered.RESULTS: The per protocol(PP) analysis was performed on 143,139,141 and 143 patients in the PAC,PAM,sequential and concomitant groups,respectively.We excluded patients who did not receive a C13-urea breath test(22,20,23 and 22 patients,respectively) and patients with less than an 80% compliance level(5,11,6 and 5 patients,respectively).The eradication rates were 76.2%(109/143) in the PAC group,84.2%(117/139) in the PAM group,84.4%(119/141) in the sequential group and 94.4%(135/143) in the concomitant group(P = 0.0002).All 14 patients who failed second-line therapy were treated with thirdline eradication therapy.Among these 14 patients,6 infections were successfully eradicated with the thirdline therapy.Both PP and intention-to-treat analysis showed an eradication rate of 42.9%(6/14).In the PAC group,3 of 4 patients were successfully cured(3/4,75%); 2 of 2 patients in the PAM group(2/2,100%) and 1 of 5 patients in the sequential group(1/5,20%) were also cured.In the concomitant group,all 3 patients failed(0/3,0%).CONCLUSION: The eradication rate for the concomitant therapy was much higher than those of the standard triple therapy or sequential therapy(Clinical Trials.gov number NCT01922765).