Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) potentiates the gonadotropin-releasing activity of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone

In order to determine if the newly discovered neuropeptide, pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide (PACAP), interacts with the known hypothalamic releasing factors to modulate pituitary hormone secretion, the effect of PACAP, either alone or in combination with either LHRH, TRH, CRF or GHRH, was examined in rat anterior pituitary cell cultures. While PACAP alone weakly stimulated LH and FSH release, PACAP and LHRH, in combination, interacted synergistically to stimulate gonadotropin secretion. No significant changes in the secretion of either TSH, ACTH, or GH were observed in response to PACAP, either alone or in combination with the other releasing factors. Addition of an LHRH antagonist demonstrated that the PACAP effect on gonadotropin release was neither mediated by the LHRH receptor nor the result of LHRH contamination of the PACAP preparation. Because of the sequence homology (68%) between the N-terminal 28 amino acids of PACAP and VIP, the addition of a VIP antagonist was used to demonstrate that the PACAP effect is not mediated through the VIP receptor. The observation that PACAP interacts synergistically with LHRH in stimulating gonadotropin release suggests intriguing possibilities for PACAP in regulating gonadotropin secretion and reproductive function.     

Pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide, growth hormone (GH)-releasing peptide and GH-releasing hormone stimulate GH release through distinct pituitary receptors.

GH secretion has been thought traditionally to be regulated by the two hypothalamic hormones, GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin (SRIF). Recent evidence has suggested that other factors may be involved. These factors include the natural ligand for the synthetic hexapeptide GH-releasing peptide (GHRP) and the putative hypophysiotropic factor pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PA-CAP). Accordingly, we examined the effects of GHRP and PACAP on GH secretion at the single cell level using the reverse hemolytic plaque assay which allows distinction of effects on the number of secreting cells and the amount of hormone each cell secretes. Both factors stimulated GH secretion in a dose-dependent fashion, with PACAP being more effective. PACAP increased both the number of cells secreting and the mean amount of hormone secreted per cell. In contrast, GHRP increased the number of secreting cells, although it had no effect on the amount of secretion per cell. GH secretion induced by GHRH, GHRP, and PACAP was inhibited by SRIF, but the effect was predominantly on the number of cells secreting rather than the amount secreted per cell. Specific antagonists to GHRP and GHRH inhibited GH secretion induced by the respective agonist but not that induced by the other factor nor by PACAP. These findings confirm the complex nature of the regulation of GH secretion at the level of the somatotrope. At least three factors, operating via distinct receptors, are able to increase GH secretion. In addition, they ascribe a potential physiological role for the hitherto putative hypophysiotropic factor PACAP.     

Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) is important for embryo implantation in mice

Mice lacking pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) show high mortality during the postnatal period, as well as impaired reproduction in females. This study characterizes the reproductive phenotype in female mice lacking PACAP due to targeted disruption (knockout) of the single copy pacap gene (Adcyap1) to determine the site(s) of action of PACAP in the cascade of reproductive events. PACAP null females showed normal puberty onset, estrous cycles, and seminal plugs when paired with a male of proven fertility. However, significantly fewer PACAP null females (21%) than wild-type females (100%) gave birth following mating. Although a defect was not detected in ovulation, ovarian histology or fertilization of released eggs in PACAP null females, only 13% had implanted embryos 6.5 days after mating. Associated with the decrease in implantation, prolactin and progesterone levels were significantly lower in females lacking PACAP than in wild types on day 6.5 after mating. Our evidence suggests that impaired implantation is the defect responsible for decreased fertility in PACAP null female mice.     

Primary structure of frog pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) and effects of ovine PACAP on frog pituitary.

Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP), a peptide of the glucagon-secretin-vasoactive intestinal polypeptide superfamily, was isolated in pure form from the brain of the European green frog, Rana ridibunda. The primary structure of the peptide indicates that evolutionary pressure to conserve the complete amino acid sequence has been very strong. Frog PACAP comprises 38 amino acid residues and contains only 1 substitution (isoleucine for valine at position 35) compared with human/ovine/rat PACAP. In the presence of the phosphodiesterase inhibitor isobutylmethylxanthine, synthetic ovine PACAP-(1-38) produced a dose-dependent increase in the concentration of cAMP in isolated frog anterior pituitary fragments (ED50 = 2.1 +/- 0.6 x 10(-7) M; mean +/- SE; n = 6). Maximum stimulation (an approximately 8-fold increase in concentration over basal values) was produced by 10(-6) M peptide. The truncated form of PACAP [PACAP-(1-27)] also produced a dose-dependent increase in cAMP in frog anterior pituitary fragments, and the potency of the peptide (ED50 = 5.9 +/- 0.6 x 10(-8) M) was comparable to that of PACAP-(1-38). The data suggest, therefore, that the function as well as the structure of PACAP have been conserved during the evolution of amphibia to mammals.     

Growth hormone (GH)-releasing factor does not regulate GH release or GH mRNA levels in GH3 cells

Previous studies have shown that GH-releasing factor (GRF) regulates both GH production and GH mRNA levels in primary cultures of rat pituitary cells. Investigations were carried out to ascertain the ability of GRF to regulate GH production or mRNA levels in a clonal strain of rat pituitary tumor (GH3) cells. Incubation of the cells with GRF at 1-1000 nM for 4 h to 10 days did not result in a stimulation of GH or PRL production, nor did it affect the cytoplasmic levels of the corresponding mRNAs. The lack of response to GRF was not affected by dexamethasone, T3, or serum. We conclude that GH3 cells do not provide a useful model system for studies of the mechanism(s) of action of GRF on either GH release or GH gene expression.     

Effect of withdrawal of somatostatin and growth hormone (GH)-releasing factor on GH release in vitro

The secretion of GH, in vivo, is pulsatile. We have proposed that the timing of the episodic bursts of GH secretion is set by somatostatin (SRIF) withdrawal, while the magnitude of the bursts is set by the amount of GH-releasing factor (GRF) impinging on the somatotrophs, before and during SRIF withdrawal. We have now used an in vitro model of perifused rat pars distalis cells to further examine the interaction between GRF and SRIF on the magnitude of the burst of GH release that follows SRIF withdrawal. We first characterized the GH response, with time, to constant perifusion with GRF. The initial burst, followed by a rapid decrease in GH release induced by constant perifusion is due to a loss of GRF bioactivity in the perifusion medium and not to a decreasing responsiveness of the somatotrophs. This was followed by studies on the interaction between GRF and SRIF. The burst of GH release after cessation of perifusion with SRIF (10(-9) M) plus GRF (10(-10) M) can be blocked by the administration of SRIF during the burst. Also, the magnitude of the burst is proportional to the concentration of GRF preceding the withdrawal of SRIF. It is likely that similar relations apply in vivo, where SRIF withdrawal sets the timing and duration of the episodic burst of GH release, while GRF sets the magnitude.     

Human growth hormone (GH)-releasing factor stimulates and somatostatin inhibits the release of rat GH variants

Two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2D PAGE) was used for the analysis of proteins secreted by male rat pituitary cells in monolayer culture in the presence of 10 nM human GH-releasing factor (hGRF) or 30 nM somatostatin (SRIF) or in the absence of these factors. More than 300 medium proteins were reproducibly detected either by fluorographic autoradiography or by silver staining. Immunoreactivity of each protein was examined after 2D PAGE followed by Western blotting and immunostaining with affinity-purified antirat GH (rGH) antibody. While there was a cluster of immunoreactive spots in the GH dimer range (40,000-50,000 mol wt), at least 16 medium proteins of mol wt 22,000 or less were also stained. Among these 16 proteins the release of 15 was stimulated and the release of 14 was inhibited by hGRF and SRIF, respectively. On the other hand, there were 3 proteins of approximate mol wt 16,000 whose secretion was regulated in a coordinate manner as rGH by the hypothalamic factors but which did not cross-react with anti-rGH antibodies. The increase or decrease in the radioactivity of each protein spot obtained from media after pituitary cells were incubated with [35S]methionine and hypothalamic factors was analyzed statistically. A pulse-chase study suggested that at least 7 of the hormonally regulated proteins, including rGH, were synthesized very rapidly. Finally, the 2D PAGE analysis of cell-free translation products of messenger RNA derived from male rat anterior pituitaries revealed the presence of about 40 rGH-immunoreactive proteins which included pre-GH. These data suggest that there are multiple forms of rGH-variants or rGH-related proteins. The biological significance(s) of all the rGH immunoreactive proteins and of the GRF- and SRIF-regulated pituitary proteins remains unclear. It is evident that a number of these proteins are synthesized and released rapidly by pituitary cells in culture. Furthermore, the presence of multiple genes for these rGH-related proteins is suggested by the large family of immunoreactive gene products identified after cell-free translation of messenger RNA derived from the pituitary.     

Roles and mechanisms of action of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) in growth hormone and prolactin secretion.

It appears that PACAP has a direct action on somatotrophs to release GH. The intracellular signal transduction mechanisms for PACAP might be similar to but partly distinct from those for GRH. PACAP might play a role in GH secretion induced by serotoninergic mechanisms but not in ultradian rhythm of GH secretion in the rat. PACAP can stimulate PRL release from the pituitary in rats possibly through indirect paracrine effect. In addition, PACAP might participate in regulation of PRL secretion via hypothalamic VIP.     

Growth hormone (GH)-releasing factor stimulates hypothalamic somatostatin release: an inhibitory feedback effect on GH secretion

GH-releasing factor (GRF) is a hypothalamic peptide that stimulates the secretion of pituitary GH. The possibility of feedback effects of GRF within the central nervous system was studied in conscious freely moving male rats with indwelling iv and intracerebroventricular (icv) cannulae. Animals were injected icv or iv with 10 ng-10 micrograms human (h) GRF(1-40)-OH (hGRF-40) or GRF(1-44)-NH2 (hGRF-44), and blood samples were obtained every 10-20 min from 1000-1400 h. GH secretion was pulsatile, with major secretory peaks at around 1200 h in most control animals. When 10 ng hGRF-40 were injected icv at 1100 h, immediately before the expected onset of the spontaneous GH secretory burst, GH secretion was suppressed during the following 2-h period. An iv injection of 10 ng hGRF-40 was without effect. In contrast, when 1 microgram hGRF-40 was injected icv or iv, plasma GH levels peaked at 20 and 10 min, respectively, and returned toward baseline shortly thereafter. The spontaneous GH secretory pulse after 1 microgram hGRF-40 (icv or iv) was suppressed in proportion to the magnitude of the GH secretory response to GRF (r = 0.78, p less than 0.01), and the prolongation of the interval between the injection of GRF and the subsequent spontaneous GH surge was directly related to the GH response to GRF (r = 0.85, p less than 0.001). The icv or iv injection of a larger dose of either hGRF-40 or hGRF-44 (10 micrograms) at 1100 h also resulted in marked and comparable increases in plasma GH levels, with peaks at 20 min (icv) and 10 min (iv) after injection. No changes in behavior or plasma glucose were observed up to 3 h after icv injection of any of the doses of hGRF-40 or of hGRF-44. The suppressive effect of centrally administered hGRF-40 (10 ng) on GH secretion was blocked by the iv administration of a specific antisomatostatin serum immediately before the injection of hGRF. These results demonstrate a dual action of GRF on spontaneous GH secretion and indicate the presence of an inhibitory feedback system within the central nervous system for the regulation of GH secretion which is mediated by hypothalamic somatostatin.     

Antiserum to rat growth hormone (GH)-releasing factor suppresses but does not abolish antisomatostatin-induced GH release in the rat

Injection of SRIF antiserum (oA-SRIF) increases serum GH and TSH levels in urethane-anesthetized rats. These responses require an intact hypothalamus with endogenous GH-releasing factor (GHRF) or TRH, respectively. We examined whether pretreatment of rats with an antiserum against rat GHRF (oA-rGHRF) would abolish the GH response to oA-SRIF, since anti-TRH serum has been shown to abolish TSH response to oA-SRIF. Prior injection of oA-rGHRF reduced oA-SRIF-induced GH response in a dose-related manner in a dose up to 1 ml antiserum, but failed to produce any further suppression at higher doses. The maximum suppression of the GH response was approximately 50%. oA-rGHRF also suppresses basal GH levels significantly. On the other hand, oA-rGHRF completely abolished the GH-releasing activity of 1 microgram synthetic rGHRF when incubated for 30 min at room temperature before injection. The results suggest two conclusions: 1) 43-residue rGHRF is a physiological regulator of both basal and stimulated GH release; 2) failure of oA-rGHRF to completely abolish the GH response to oA-SRIF suggests the presence of other physiological GHRFs in the rat.     

Effect of somatostatin withdrawal and growth hormone (GH)-releasing factor on GH release in vitro: amount available for release after disinhibition

The secretion of GH is strikingly episodic. We have suggested that the timing of the episodic bursts of GH secretion is set by somatostatin (SRIF) withdrawal, whereas the magnitude of the bursts is determined by the amount of GH-releasing factor (GRF) impinging on the somatotrophs before and during SRIF withdrawal. We have now used an in vitro model of perifused rat pars distalis cells to examine the interaction of SRIF and GRF on GH release and, in particular, to examine the effect of GRF on the magnitude of the burst of GH release that follows SRIF withdrawal. After 30 min of perifusion with SRIF (10(-9) M), there follows an immediate but small burst of GH release. The burst of GH release following concurrent perifusion with SRIF plus GRF (10(-10) M) is increased, with a 7.5- to 9.5-fold increase in the peak secretion rate. When GRF is maintained after the withdrawal of SRIF, the peak secretion rate is not different from that seen after simple withdrawal of both SRIF and GRF, but the duration of the burst is increased. These data demonstrate that the presence of GRF during SRIF perifusion, while not altering basal release, does strikingly increase the post-SRIF release of GH. We propose that a similar relation applies in vivo, where SRIF withdrawal sets the timing of the episodic bursts of GH release, whereas GRF determines the magnitude.     

In vivo studies with growth hormone (GH)-releasing factor and clonidine in rat pups: ontogenetic development of their effect on GH release and synthesis

The demonstration that GH-releasing factor (GRF) stimulates GH synthesis and release in rat pups prompted studies to evaluate the effects on the same indices of clonidine (CLO), an alpha 2-adrenoceptor and potent GH secretagogue, purported to act in adult rats via GRF release. Our first aim was to ascertain whether CLO elicits GH release in rat pups via GRF, and if this is the case, to evaluate the ontogenetic development in 1- to 10-day-old pups of the GH response to acute CLO or GRF administration and, finally, the effects of short term CLO or GRF treatment on plasma and pituitary GH concentrations and on the GH response to an acute challenge with the homologous secretagogue. CLO (15 micrograms/100 g BW, sc) induced a clearcut GH rise in 10-day-old rats but not in pups pretreated with a specific anti-GRF serum. Moreover, unlike GRF (10(-8) M), CLO (10(-6) to 10(-5) M) did not stimulate GH release in vitro from anterior pituitaries of 10-day-old rats. In 1-day-old rats, neither CLO (15 micrograms/100 g BW, sc) nor GRF (20 ng/100 g BW, sc) stimulated GH release, whereas significant GH stimulation was elicited by GRF, but not CLO, in 5-day-old rats and by both secretagogues in 10-day-old rats. Short term treatment with CLO (15 micrograms/100 g BW, sc, twice daily) or GRF (20 ng/100 g BW, sc, twice daily) on postnatal days 1 through 5 did not modify either plasma or pituitary GH concentrations 14 h after the last drug administration, but did so when either secretagogue was administered on postnatal days 5 through 9. Finally, an acute challenge with GRF, but not with CLO, induced a further rise in the already elevated plasma GH levels of pups pretreated from postnatal day 5 through 9, but neither secretagogue did so in pups pretreated from postnatal days 1 to 5. Viewed together, these data indicate that in infant rats CLO releases GH via GRF release and that the somatotropes respond earlier to GRF (5 days) than the GRF-secreting structures do to alpha 2-adrenergic stimulation (10 days). Both GRF and CLO stimulate GH synthesis when administered repeatedly. However, whereas repeated GRF treatment has a priming effect on the somatotropes, CLO does not, probably because of down-regulation of hypothalamic alpha 2-adrenoceptors.     

The growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone (GHRH)-GH-somatomedin axis: evidence for rapid inhibition of GHRH-elicited GH release by insulin-like growth factors I and II

Hypothalamic-pituitary-end-organ axes are frequently controlled by long loop negative feedback homeostatic mechanisms. Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), IGF-II, and insulin receptors have recently been described in normal and neoplastic rat and acromegalic human pituitary cells, a finding which suggests the possibility that somatomedins might exert feedback at the level of the anterior pituitary. To study the kinetics of this feedback response, we used perifused dispersed rat anterior pituitary cells to learn if somatomedins or insulin could inhibit GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-stimulated GH secretion. Cells were exposed to hourly boluses of 1 nM GHRH with or without varying doses of IGF or insulin. IGF-I inhibited GHRH-elicited GH release with an IC50 of 6.5 nM; maximal inhibition (approximately 67%) was achieved with 10 nM IGF-I. IGF-II was a less potent hormone, with 10 nM inhibiting about 30% of GHRH-stimulated GH release. Slight inhibition of stimulated GH release (less than 15%) was seen when cells were treated with insulin, but only when doses of insulin of 10 nM or more were used. In conclusion, nanomolar concentrations of IGF-I and IGF-II inhibited GHRH-elicited GH release from perifused rat pituitary cells in a dose-dependent manner; and insulin was not an effective inhibitor of stimulated GH release at physiological peptide concentrations. In conjunction with our previous findings that the concentrations of IGF-I and IGF-II receptors greatly exceed that of insulin receptors on normal rat pituitary cells, we hypothesize that the GH-inhibiting action of high dose insulin is mediated through an IGF receptor.     

Presence of an adenylate cyclase dually regulated by somatostatin and human pancreatic growth hormone (GH)-releasing factor in GH-secreting cells

We have investigated the effects of SRIF and human pancreatic GH-releasing factor-44 (hpGRF-44) on adenylate cyclase (AC) activity of male rat anterior pituitaries (in which somatotrophs are present in large proportion) and of human GH-secreting pituitary adenomas (which are almost homogeneously constituted by somatotrophs). The adenoma's responsiveness to both agents in terms of secretion was previously demonstrated in in vitro experiments. SRIF inhibited in a dose-dependent fashion the GH release from monolayer cultures of the tumors. The inhibition ranged from 32-66% at the maximal effective concentration (10(-6) M). hpGRF-44 stimulated GH release in a dose-dependent fashion. The stimulation was 78-172% at 10(-7) M. SRIF and hpGRF-44 markedly affected AC activity in both systems. SRIF elicited a pronounced inhibition of the enzyme activity in a dose-dependent manner. The inhibition was about 40% in the rat and ranged from 16-49% in adenomas at the maximal effective concentration (10(-5) M SRIF). The inhibitory effect was GTP-dependent. hpGRF-44 markedly stimulated AC activity. The stimulation was dose dependent and GTP dependent. The stimulation was about 650% in the rat and 26-350% in adenomas at the maximal effective concentration (10(-6) M). These results suggest the presence of a dually regulated (by SRIF and hpGRF-44) AC in GH-secreting cells; an involvement of cAMP in the intracellular mechanisms transducing the signals of SRIF and hpGRF-44 in somatotrophs.     

Solution structure of murine epidermal growth factor: determination of the polypeptide backbone chain-fold by nuclear magnetic resonance and distance geometry.

The polypeptide backbone fold in the solution structure of murine epidermal growth factor has been determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and distance geometry calculations. The results are based on nearly complete sequence-specific resonance assignments and on 333 distance and dihedral-angle constraints; these were determined from nuclear Overhauser effect measurements, identification of hydrogen-bonded amide protons, the known locations of disulfide bonds, and backbone vicinal spin-spin coupling constants. The polypeptide chain of the protein is arranged into two distinct domains. The structures of these domains were determined independently in separate calculations and then combined to obtain an overall view of the protein. The backbone fold thus determined includes the regular backbone structure elements that were previously identified using different techniques for the analysis of the nuclear magnetic resonance data. The distance geometry calculations also provided additional details about the conformations of bends and loops and about the twists of the beta-sheets.