Intravenous azathioprine in severe ulcerative colitis: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE: Azathioprine use in acute ulcerative colitis has been limited by its perceived long onset of action. The aim of this study was to determine the safety and clinical effect of an i.v. loading dose of azathioprine in the setting of severe steroid refractory ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Nine hospitalized patients with severe steroid refractory ulcerative colitis were enrolled. Patients 1-3 received 20 mg/kg i.v. azathioprine over 36 h. Patients 4-6 received 40 mg/kg i.v. azathioprine over 36 h. Patients 7-9 received 40 mg/kg i.v. azathioprine as three 8-h infusions over 3 days. Clinical remission was defined as steroid withdrawal and an Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity Index score of 0. The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire was obtained at each visit. White blood cell concentrations and erythrocyte concentrations of 6-thioguanine were obtained. RESULTS: Five of nine patients (56%) had a response and avoided colectomy. Three of nine patients (33%) met the definition for clinical remission. Response was seen within 4 wk. The mean 6-thioguanine concentration for those five patients at 12 wk after infusion was 148.2 pmol/8 x 10(8). Two patients had transient leukopenia and one had transient hepatotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous azathioprine appears to be safe and of clinical benefit in inducing response and avoiding colectomy in severe steroid refractory ulcerative colitis. Data from an i.v. azathioprine trial in Crohn's disease suggests oral dosing alone may obtain the same results. The role of oral dosing alone in severe ulcerative colitis and the role of azathioprine metabolite levels in monitoring efficacy should be investigated further.     

Oral and topical 5-aminosalicylic acid (mesalazine) in inducing and maintaining remission in mild-moderate relapse of ulcerative colitis: one-year randomised multicentre trial

BACKGROUND: The association of oral 5-aminosalicylic acid (mesalazine) and enema is effective in treatment of mild-moderate forms of ulcerative colitis. However no study has been aimed at determining optimal duration of this association in active ulcerative colitis. AIM: To determine whether longer duration of therapy: 1. increases the rate of patients achieving remission, and 2. reduces relapse rate during the maintenance period in patients in remission. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 149 patients, (89 male, 60 female), were randomly assigned to a regimen with 5-aminosalicylic acid tablets 2.4 g/day associated with 5-aminosalycilic enema 2 g/day for a 4-week (n = 73) or 8-week regimen (n = 76). After this acute therapy, patients were submitted to clinical, endoscopic and histological examinations and those in remission were assigned to a follow-up (maintenance) period with oral mesalazine alone at a dosage of 1.2 g/day. A clinical visit, including laboratory tests, at 6 months and an endoscopic-histological control at 12 months were carried out to exclude symptoms and endoscopic-histological signs of activity. Relapse of disease, i.e., presence of clinical symptoms or abnormal laboratory tests, was confirmed by endoscopy and histology. RESULTS: At end of acute phase, clinical, endoscopic and histological remission was comparable in the two groups: 42/76 (55%), in the 4-week, and 47/73 patients (64%), in the 8-week regimen. No difference was found stratifying patients according to extension of disease. Of these 89 patients in remission, 75 (34 from 4-week regimen; 41 from 8-week regimen) completed 12 months' follow-up. At end of follow-up, a similar percentage of patients in the 4-week regimen (50%) and 8-week regimen (51%) were still in remission. No significant difference between cumulative relapse rates of the two groups was found. Stratifying patients according to extension of disease, in the 8-week regimen group, those with left-sided colitis showed a higher remission rate than that of patients with diffuse colitis (66% versus 35%, p < 0.05). All regimens were well tolerated by most patients during the entire study period. CONCLUSIONS: An additional 4 weeks of topical treatment does not increase the remission rate in patients with mild-moderate active ulcerative colitis but seems to reduce the probability of relapse in patients with left-sided colitis.     

The optimal dose of 5-aminosalicylic acid in active ulcerative colitis: a dose-finding study with newly developed mesalamine.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: 5-Aminosalicylate is the gold standard for inducing remission in patients with mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis. The optimal dose is as yet not defined. Despite some recent developments, the ideal formulation for 5-aminosalicylic acid is still awaited. A new pellet preparation was designed combining slow and delayed release properties. Aims of the study were to find the optimal dose and to test efficacy and safety of a new 5-aminosalicylic acid formulation. METHODS: Three hundred twenty-one patients were included in a double-blind multicenter trial. Inclusion criteria were active ulcerative colitis (Clinical Activity Index [CAI] and Endoscopic Index [EI] according to Rachmilewitz, CAI 6-12; EI >/=4). Three different doses of 5-aminosalicylic acid (0.5 g 3 times a day, 1.0 g 3 times a day, and 1.5 g 3 times a day) were studied for 8 weeks. RESULTS: Clinical remission rate (CAI 相似文献   

An open-label trial of the PPARγ ligand rosiglitazone for active ulcerative colitis

OBJECTIVES: Previous research has demonstrated that ligands for the gamma subtype of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) reduce inflammation in two different murine models of colitis. This study was designed to examine the potential efficacy of rosiglitazone, a ligand for the gamma subtype of PPARs, as a therapy for active ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Fifteen patients with mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis despite therapy with 5-aminosalicylic acid compounds were enrolled in an open-label study of rosiglitazone (4 mg b.i.d. p.o.) for 12 wk. Thirteen of 15 patients were receiving concomitant therapy with corticosteroids and/or immunomodulator medications. Disease activity was measured with the Disease Activity Index. RESULTS: After 12 wk of therapy, four patients (27%) had achieved clinical remission, of whom three (20%) also had an endoscopic remission. Four additional patients (27%) had a clinical response without achieving remission. Two patients were hospitalized with worsened disease activity, and one patient was withdrawn for nephrotic syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that ligands for the gamma subtype of PPARs may represent a novel therapy for ulcerative colitis. A double blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial is warranted.     

Infliximab to treat severe ulcerative colitis

A 48-year-old female with severe ulcerative colitis refractory to conventional therapy was referred to our facility for management. The patient showed extensive ulcerative colitis since the age of 20 years and had failed therapy with 5-aminosalicylic acid agents and azathioprine. The disease remained active despite treatment with steroids and cyclosporine. The clinical and endoscopic parameters were consistent with severe disease. Infectious precipitants were ruled out. Given the severity of the disease and in order to avoid a colectomy, we started the patient on infliximab therapy. A dramatic clinical and endoscopic response was observed and she remained in remission at the end of a 1-year follow-up period. We discuss findings in the literature regarding the use of infliximab therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis who have failed steroids and cyclosporine.     

Effects of topical 5-aminosalicylic acid and prednisolone on prostaglandin E2 and leukotriene B4 levels determined by equilibrium in vivo dialysis of rectum in relapsing ulcerative colitis

To determine the influence of inflammation and topical treatment with 5-aminosalicylic acid or prednisolone on arachidonic acid metabolism in vivo, we carried out a double-blind controlled study on the release of prostaglandin E2 and leukotriene B4 to the rectal lumen in 24 consecutive patients with proven distally located ulcerative colitis. Before and at days 15 and 29 a dialysis bag was placed in the emptied rectum for 4 h prior to assessing clinical, endoscopic, and histologic disease activity. A single enema was given daily at bedtime (1 g 5-aminosalicylic acid or 25 mg prednisolone) until complete remission or for a maximum of 4 wk. Clinical and endoscopic remission was obtained in 16 (7 on 5-aminosalicylic acid) and 11 (3 on 5-aminosalicylic acid) patients, respectively. Luminal concentrations of prostaglandin E2 and leukotriene B4 were positively correlated to disease activity and significantly decreased among the prednisolone-treated patients. In both treatment groups a decrease toward normal levels occurred in patients responding to therapy. In retrospect, the pretreatment prostaglandin E2 and leukotriene B4 levels were significantly higher in patients not responding to therapy than in those improving during treatment. In conclusion, luminal prostaglandin E2 and leukotriene B4 levels may prove more useful predictors of the outcome of treatment in relapsing ulcerative colitis than clinical indices of disease activity.     

Compared azathioprine efficacy in ulcerative colitis and in Crohn's disease

AIM: To compare the 6-month efficacy and tolerance of azathioprine in 68 patients with steroid-resistant or steroid-dependent chronic ulcerative colitis (n=30) or Crohn's disease (n=38).METHODS: Clinical remission was defined as a Crohn's Disease Activity Index<150 for Crohn's disease and number of non-bloody stools<=3/day for ulcerative colitis, associated with prednisone requirement<=10 mg/day.RESULTS: Seventy-three per cent of patients with ulcerative colitis had distal or left-sided colitis and 84% of patients with Crohn's disease had pancolitis. Azathioprine was discontinued early for side-effect in 8 (26.7%) patients with ulcerative colitis and in 8 (21.1%) patients with Crohn's disease (NS). In patients treated at least 6 months by azathioprine, clinical remission rates were 77.3% and 70% for chronic ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease (NS). Complete corticosteroids weaning was obtained significantly more often in ulcerative colitis patients than in Crohn's disease patients (59.1% vs 30%; P<0.05).CONCLUSION: Azathioprine seems to be at least as effective and equally tolerated in steroid-resistant or steroid-dependent chronic ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease patients.     

Low Pentasa Dosage Versus Hydrocortisone in the Topical Treatment of Active Ulcerative Colitis: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study

Objectives : To compare a low dosage (1 g/day) rectal preparation of 5-aminosalicylic acid in slightly acidic, buffered suspension (Pentasa) with a hydrocortisone 100 mg/day enema (Cortenema). Methods : Fifty-two patients with mild to moderate distal ulcerative colitis were randomized under double-blind conditions to receive a rectal preparation of either Pentasa (1 g/day) or Cortenema (100 mg/day) for 3 wk. Results : After 3 wk, both types of treatment resulted in statistically significant improvements in clinical and endoscopic activity. No significant difference was observed between the two drugs in any of the parameters considered, although a statistical trend in favor of Pentasa was evident when analysis was limited to clinical activity ( p = 0.07). No side effects were reported in either group. Conclusions : Our experience confirms that short term topical treatment with a low dosage 5-aminosalicylic acid is at least as effective as 100-mg hydrocortisone enemas in treating mild to moderate distal ulcerative colitis and is generally well tolerated.     

Balsalazide is superior to mesalamine in the time to improvement of signs and symptoms of acute mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis

OBJECTIVE: Balsalazide is a novel azo-bonded 5-aminosalicylic acid treatment for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. The study objective was to compare symptomatic remission rates with balsalazide and mesalamine while controlling for extent of disease and time since diagnosis in patients with active, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. METHODS: A total of 173 patients with sigmoidoscopically verified ulcerative colitis were randomized to 8 wk of double-blind treatment with balsalazide 6.75 g/day or mesalamine 2.4 g/day. Both treatments provided 2.4 g/day of oral 5-aminosalicylic acid. Patients maintained symptom diaries throughout the treatment period. RESULTS: Overall, 46% of balsalazide- and 44% of mesalamine-treated patients achieved symptomatic remission. Higher response rates were noted in newly diagnosed patients with < or = 40 cm of disease (68% vs 61%) than in recently relapsed patients with >40 cm of disease (36% vs 25%). The median time to symptomatic remission was 12 days shorter with balsalazide (25 days) than with mesalamine (37 days). Significantly more balsalazide patients showed sigmoidoscopic (p = 0.002), stool frequency (p = 0.006), rectal bleeding (p = 0.006), and physician's global assessment score (p = 0.013) improvement by 14 days than did mesalamine patients. Similar proportions of patients reported adverse events (54% vs 64%), which were most commonly related to the gastrointestinal and central and peripheral nervous systems. CONCLUSIONS: Balsalazide is an effective and safe treatment for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. Improvement of symptoms occurs considerably earlier with balsalazide than with mesalamine.     

Role of azathioprine in severe ulcerative colitis: one-year, placebo-controlled, randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of azathioprine in treating patients with severe ulcerative colitis. DESIGN: One-year, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. SUBJECTS: 83 patients with severe ulcerative colitis were enrolled. Fifty patients who relapsed within two months on corticosteroid withdrawal were randomized into two groups. The azathioprine group received oral sulfasalazine (6-8 g/day), oral prednisolone (1 mg/Kg/day) and oral azathioprine (2 mg/Kg/day). The placebo group received oral sulfasalazine (6-8 g/day), oral prednisolone (1 mg/Kg/day) and placebo. Corticosteroids were tapered over 12-16 weeks. RESULTS: Five patients (2 in azathioprine group, 3 in placebo group) dropped out of the study. Three patients in the azathioprine group had side effects. The number of patients going into complete remission and partial remission was not significantly different in the two groups. The proportion of relapses in the azathioprine group was lower than in the placebo group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ulcerative colitis, azathioprine had no effect in achieving remission, when given in combination with prednisolone; however, it lowers the proportion of relapses. Side effects like pancreatitis and hepatitis are mild and respond promptly to drug withdrawal.     

Combined therapy with 5-aminosalicylic tablets and enemas for maintaining remission in ulcerative colitis.

A combined therapy with 5-aminosalicylic (5-ASA) tablets (1.6gr/day) and 5-ASA enemas (4gr/twice weekly) was evaluated for maintaining remission of ulcerative colitis in 40 patients. All patients were in complete remission which had been maintained for at least 1 month. The remission was assessed by clinical, endoscopic and histological criteria. Clinical and endoscopical evaluations were performed at intervals of 2 and 6 months, respectively. The relapse-rate associated with this combined therapy was 7.5% at 6 months and 16% at 12 months. In comparison with previous investigations using continuous sulphasalazine, our study showed that the combination of 5-aminosalicylic tablets and enemas provided low relapse rates both at 6 and 12 months, suggesting a potential effectiveness in this form of treatment. Further studies are needed to confirm this result with controlled clinical trials.     

Ulcerative colitis: analyses of 116 cases (do extraintestinal manifestations effect the time to catch remission?)

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Evaluation of clinical, demographic and epidemiologic features of ulcerative colitis and therapy response of these patients. METHODOLOGY: Retrospectively, 116 patients (64.7% female) were enrolled in this study. Mean age and mean follow-up period were 36+/-16, 5+/-2 years, respectively. RESULTS: The most common anatomic involvement was pancolitis (60.3%) and the others were as follows: left side 25%, rectum 13.8% and ileum (backwash ileitis) 0.9%. Extraintestinal manifestations were observed in 42.2% of patients (sacroiliitis 12%, primary sclerosing cholangitis 7.6%, pyoderma gangrenosum 2.4%, peripheral arthropathy 1.6%, autoimmune hepatitis 1.6%, steatosis 12.9%, gallstone 0.8%, perianal fistulas 0.8%, sagittal sinus thrombosis 0.8%, psoriasis 0.8%). Multiple extraintestinal manifestations were observed (primary sclerosing cholangitis + pyoderma gangrenosum) in 2 patients. Colonic perforation due to toxic megacolon was observed in only one patient during follow-up period. The mean period for remission was 3.7 months in 72% of patients with pancolitis by the treatment of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) (2-3 gr/day) + methylprednisolone (1 mg/kg/day) +/- (for maintenance of remission) azathioprine (AZT) (1.5-2 mg/kg/day); 3.7 months in 72% of left-sided colitis by 5-ASA +/- corticosteroid enemas +/- methylprednisolone (1 mg/kg/day) +/- (for maintenance of remission) AZT (1.5-2 mg/kg/day) and 3.7 months in 62.5% of patients with distal colitis by 5-ASA (p.o. +/- enema) +/- corticosteroid enemas. Colectomy was performed on 7 patients refractory to these treatments. Six patients (4 of them had pancolitis) were treated with cyclosporine (Cys) (4 mg/kg/day, p.o.). Only one patient, a non-responder to Cys therapy, had colectomy. The mean remission time was 4.7 months in 80.6% of patients with extraintestinal involvement and 3.2 months in 71.2% of patients without extraintestinal involvement (P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Medical therapy was generally enough for the treatment. Cys and/or surgery can be another choice for the patients that do not respond to the medical therapy. Extraintestinal manifestations do not change the remission rate, but prolong the time to catch remission.     

Sulphasalazine and 5-aminosalicylic acid in long-term treatment of ulcerative colitis: report on tolerance and side-effects

BACKGROUND: Use of sulphasalazine in ulcerative colitis patients is hampered by a variety of side-effects, including male infertility. 5-aminosalicylic acid is better tolerated and has been increasingly used to treat patients intolerant/allergic to sulphasalazine but it may also be associated with side-effects. AIM: To evaluate tolerance of long-term treatment with sulphasalazine and 5-aminosalicylic acid in ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Side-effects to sulphasalazine (2-3 g/day) and 5-aminosalicylic acid (1.2-2.4 g/day) were recorded in 685 patients: 410 patients received only sulphasalazine, 130 only 5-aminosalicylic acid, and 145 both drugs. In patients with side-effects to sulphasalazine, a desensitisation protocol (rechallenge) was attempted to improve tolerance, and patients still presenting side-effects after desensitisation were switched to 5-aminosalicylic acid. Male fertility was also assessed in 42 males on sulphasalazine and on 5-aminosalicylic acid. RESULTS: Side-effects were observed in 110/555 patients (20%) on sulphasalazine and in 18/275 patients (6.5%) on 5-aminosalicylic acid during a median period of follow-up of 7 and 5 years, respectively. Desensitisation was achieved in 40% of patients intolerant to sulphasalazine. 5-aminosalicylic acid intake induced side-effects in 2/130 patients (1.5%) who had not taken sulphasalazine before versus 4/91 patients (4%) tolerating sulphasalazine and 12/54 patients (22%) intolerant/allergic to sulphasalazine, the difference in incidence of side-effects in the two latter groups being statistically significant (4.4% vs 20.8%, p=0. 001). Fertility was found to be affected in all patients on sulphasalazine but improved when put onto 5-aminosalicylic acid. CONCLUSIONS: 5-aminosalicylic acid should be considered the drug of choice in the treatment of ulcerative colitis bearing in mind that intolerance or allergy may occur in a few patients also on this drug.     

Evaluation of 5 versus 10 granulocyteaphaeresis sessions in steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis： A pilot, prospective, multicenter, randomized study

AIM： To evaluate the efficacy of 5 compared to ：tO granulocyteaphaeresis sessions in patients with active steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis.
METHODS： In this pilot, prospective, multicenter randomized trial, 20 patients with moderately active steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis were randomized to 5 or 10 granulocyteaphaeresis sessions. The primary objective was clinical remission at wk 17. Secondary measures included endoscopic remission and steroid consumption.
RESULTS： Nine patients were randomized to 5 granulocyteaphaeresis sessions （group 1） and 11 patients to 10 granulocyteaphaeresis sessions （group 2）. At wk 17, 37.5% of patients in group 1 and 45.45% of patients in group 2 were in clinical remission. Clinical remission was accompanied by endoscopic remission in all cases. Eighty-six percent of patients achieving remission were steroid-free at wk 17. Daily steroid requirements were significantly lower in group 2. Eighty-nine per cent of patients remained in remission during a one year follow-up. One serious adverse event, not related to the study therapy, was reported.
CONCLUSION： Granulocyteaphaeresis is safe and effective for the treatment of steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis. In this population, increasing the number of aphaeresis sessions is not associated with higher remission rates, but affords a significant steroid-sparing effect.     

Effects of sulphasalazine and disodium azodisalicylate on colonic PGE2 concentrations determined by equilibrium in vivo dialysis of faeces in patients with ulcerative colitis and healthy controls.

The role of arachidonic acid metabolites and the mode of action of 5-aminosalicylic acid, the active moiety of sulphasalazine and disodium azodisalicylate, in ulcerative colitis remain obscure. Therefore, experiments were performed in which the effects of medication on immunoreactive prostaglandin (PG) E2 concentrations in free faecal water were assessed using the equilibrium in vivo dialysis of faeces. Colonic PGE2 concentrations in patients with active ulcerative colitis (n = 11) ranged from 2035-18,000 pg/ml to be compared with a range of 103-188 pg/ml in healthy volunteers (n = 10; p less than 0.001). In all healthy volunteers PGE2 concentrations decreased slightly (p less than 0.05) after disodium azodisalicylate intake 2 g/day, whereas low dose disodium azodisalicylate (0.25 g/day) caused no change. In patients with ulcerative colitis in complete clinical, sigmoidoscopic, and histologic remission withdrawal of sulphasalazine (2 g/day; n = 6) increased PGE2 concentrations to values above normal levels (p less than 0.05) which returned to pretrial values (p less than 0.05) on disodium azodisalicylate (2 g/day; n = 7). In conclusion, increased PGE2 in free faecal water indicates an abnormality in the colonic mucosa, even in the absence of conventional signs of inflammation. We could not confirm the hypothesis that sulphasalazine and 5-aminosalicylic acid exert their therapeutic effect through promotion of endogenous cytoprotective prostaglandins. In contrast, the observation that raised PGE2 concentrations were normalised by disodium azodisalicylate in patients with inactive ulcerative colitis suggests that subclinical disease activity was decreased by 5-aminosalicylic acid.     

Combination immunomodulatory therapy with cyclosporine and azathioprine in corticosteroid-resistant severe ulcerative colitis: the Edinburgh experience of outcome

BACKGROUND: Cyclosporine is a fungal metabolite and a powerful immunosuppressant. While response to intravenous steroids in severe ulcerative colitis is in excess of 60%, the remainder of patients are left with the options of curative panproctocolectomy or administration of intravenous rescue therapy with cyclosporine. There have been conflicting reports on the efficacy of intravenous cyclosporine in acute ulcerative colitis, and there are serious concerns about potential toxicity and opportunistic infections such as Pneumocystis carnii pneumonia. There are also concerns about early relapse and colectomy following cyclosporine rescue. To date there has been a paucity of data available to help guide the gastroenterologist in the use of cyclosporine and the maintenance of remission once achieved. METHODS: Between 1994 and 2001, a total of sixteen patients who had received intravenous cyclosporine for acute exacerbation of their known UC (seven females, nine males, mean age 33 years) whose records were available for analysis. All patients were refractory to intravenous methylprednisolone (60 mg/24 h). Patients who responded to cyclosporine were discharged on a regimen of oral cyclosporine, oral steroids oral azathioprine and 5-aminosalicylate. RESULTS: Median disease duration was 5.4 years (range 0.9-25 years). All sixteen patients were initially treated with cyclosporine at a dose of 4 mg/kg/day. Nine patients were started on oral azathioprine (median dose 1.8 mg/kg). Seven patients underwent surgery (panproctocolectomy), although none had surgery after 6 months. Comparisons were made between patients with <7 days and >7 days intravenous steroid. Other parameters analysed were stool frequency at 3 days and CRP at 3 days. There were no significant differences between these groups. Median bowel frequency at day 3 was higher in patients who finally underwent surgery. At 3 years follow-up, 56% of the sixteen patients had avoided surgery by using azathioprine immunosuppression. CONCLUSION: The initial response rate to intravenous cyclosporine was high (69%). Side effects were documented in the majority of patients, but none of the patients had to discontinue treatment on account of these. Azathioprine has a useful role in maintaining the remission achieved by i.v. cyclosporine for acute ulcerative colitis patients. More than half the patients will avoid colectomy long-term when using triple immunosuppressive therapy including azathioprine adding support for its relative safety and another role for its use.     

5-Aminosalicylic Acid Suppositories in the Maintenance of Remission in Idiopathic Proctitis or Proctosigmoiditis: A Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

Thirty patients with distal ulcerative colitis in remission (17 proctitis, 13 proctosigmoiditis) were randomly given either 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) or placebo suppositories, 400 mg bid. During the 1-yr follow-up, patients were assessed clinically every month, and flexible sigmoidoscopy with a rectal pinch biopsy specimen and laboratory data were carried out every 3 months. Two patients in the 5-ASA group chose to withdraw from the study, one relapsed, and 12 remained in remission. In the placebo group, one patient chose to withdraw, 11 relapsed, and three remained in remission. The cumulative remission rate at the 12th month was 92% in the 5-ASA group and 21% in the placebo group. Log rank test showed a significant difference in the relapse rate between the two groups (chi 2 = 14.26, p less than 0.001). No side effects were observed. We conclude that 5-ASA in suppository form (800 mg/day), administered for 1 yr, is safe and effective in maintaining remission of distal ulcerative colitis.     

Pulse cyclophosphamide therapy for inflammatory bowel disease

AIM: To assess the efficacy of intravenous cyclophosphamide pulse therapy for refractory inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).METHODS: We included in our cohort eight patients with (moderate/severe) steroid refractory IBD (4 with ulcerative colitis and 4 with Crohn's disease). They all received 6 cycles of intravenous cyclophosphamide (800mg) per month.RESULTS: Patients entered into remission after the second/third cyclophosphamide pulse. Disease activity decreased. There were no side effects and toxicity. All the patients went into long lasting remission. All Crohn's disease patients and 3 of 4 ulcerative colitis patients achieved complete remission. One patient with ulcerative colitis showed an impressive clinical response but did not enter into remission. For the maintenance, patients with Crohn's disease were treated with methotrexate (15 mg/wk) and patients with ulcerative colitis were treated with azathioprine (2.5 mg/kg body weight/d).CONCLUSION: Remission was maintained in all patients for 6 mo on the average. The drug was well tolerated. These findings suggest that aggressive immunosuppressive therapy may be useful in some refractory patients and further controlled study should be considered in order to fully evaluate this type of treatment as a potential therapy for IBD.     

Pulse cyclophosphamide therapy for inflammatory bowel disease

AIM: To assess the efficacy of intravenous cyclophosphamide pulse therapy for refractory inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: We included in our cohort eight patients with (moderate/severe) steroid refractory IBD (4 with ulcerative colitis and 4 with Crohn's disease). They all received 6 cycles of intravenous cyclophosphamide (800 mg) per month. RESULTS: Patients entered into remission after the second/third cyclophosphamide pulse. Disease activity decreased. There were no side effects and toxicity. All the patients went into long lasting remission. All Crohn's disease patients and 3 of 4 ulcerative colitis patients achieved complete remission. One patient with ulcerative colitis showed an impressive clinical response but did not enter into remission. For the maintenance, patients with Crohn's disease were treated with methotrexate (15 mg/wk) and patients with ulcerative colitis were treated with azathioprine (2.5 mg/kg body weight/d). CONCLUSION: Remission was maintained in all patients for 6 mo on the average. The drug was well tolerated. These findings suggest that aggressive immunosuppressive therapy may be useful in some refractory patients and further controlled study should be considered in order to fully evaluate this type of treatment as a potential therapy for IBD.     

Efficacy of cyclosporin in severe ulcerative colitis attack.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Cyclosporin-A is used as a alternative medical therapy in steroid resistant ulcerative colitis with severe activity. In spite of its known efficacy, the long term effects of are not entirely clear. METHODS: The records of 13 steroid resistant patients treated with cyclosporin-A were retrospectively assessed. Cyclosporin-A had been prescribed orally at a dose of 8 mg/kg/day in four patients and intravenously, 4mg/kg/day in nine patients. Intravenous therapy was changed to oral therapy after one week and patients also received 5-ASA and azathioprine. Steroid treatment was tapered. RESULTS: Ten patients responded to treatment in a mean of nine days (range: 2-30 days). Three patients who did not respond underwent total colectomy on day seven, 11 and 19 of therapy. The 10 patients who initially responded received the drug for an average of 4.9 months; four of these relapsed during and one relapsed soon after discontinuation of therapy. Four of the five patients who relapsed underwent colectomy and the one patient who did not accept surgical intervention continued medical therapy. The remaining five patients (38% of the total group; 50% of the patients who initially responded) remained in remission at the end of an average 17 month follow up period. CONCLUSIONS: Cyclosporin-A therapy in severe ulcerative colitis that is resistant to steroids, provides initial remission in 80% of patients and allows 40% to retain their colon for one year.