Pretreatment assessment and predictors of hepatitis C virus treatment in US veterans coinfected with HIV and hepatitis C virus

The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) cares for many human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C virus (HIV/HCV)-coinfected patients. VA treatment recommendations indicate that all HIV/HCV-coinfected patients undergo evaluation for HCV treatment and list pretreatment assessment tests. We compared clinical practice with these recommendations. We identified 377 HIV/HCV-coinfected veterans who began HCV therapy with pegylated interferon and ribavirin and 4135 HIV/HCV-coinfected veterans who did not but were in VA care at the same facilities during the same period. We compared laboratory and clinical characteristics of the two groups and estimated multivariate logistic regression models of receipt of HCV treatment. Overall, patients had high rates of receipt of tests necessary for HCV pretreatment assessment. Patients starting HCV treatment had higher alanine aminotransferase (ALT), lower creatinine, higher CD4 counts and lower HIV viral loads than patients not starting HCV treatment. In the multivariate model, positive predictors of starting HCV treatment included being non-Hispanic whites, having higher ALTs, lower creatinines, higher HCV viral loads, higher CD4 counts, undetectable HIV viral loads and receiving HIV antiretrovirals. A history of chronic mental illness and a history of hard drug use were negative predictors. Most HIV/HCV-coinfected patients received the necessary HCV pretreatment assessments, although rates of screening for hepatitis A and B immunity can be improved. Having well-controlled HIV disease is by far the most important modifiable factor affecting the receipt of HCV treatment. More research is needed to determine if the observed racial differences in starting HCV treatment reflect biological differences, provider behaviour or patient preference.     

Lipid abnormalities in HIV/hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients

BACKGROUND: Among HIV-infected patients, hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection is associated with increased rates of lipodystrophy and insulin resistance. Its impact on HIV-associated dyslipidaemia is less clear. METHODS: The lipid profiles of all HIV-infected patients and a subset of HCV-infected patients seen at the VA Medical Center in Dallas from January 2003 to March 2004 were analysed. Demographic data, HCV serostatus, and HIV treatment history were recorded. Lipid profiles of HIV/HCV-coinfected patients were compared with those of HIV-monoinfected and HCV-monoinfected patients. RESULTS: A total of 359 HIV-infected patients, 91 (25.3%) of whom were HCV coinfected, and 112 HCV-infected patients were included in the analysis. Among the HIV-infected patients, HCV coinfection was associated with a reduced risk of hypercholesterolaemia [9.9% vs 24.8%; relative risk (RR)=0.333; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.158-0.699; P<0.001] and hypertriglyceridaemia (48.4% vs 60.3%; RR=0.616; 95% CI=0.382-0.994; P=0.031). After controlling for duration of protease inhibitor (PI) therapy, race, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) concentration and platelet count, HCV remained an independent predictor of hypercholesterolaemia (RR=0.369; P=0.01) and any dyslipidaemia (RR=0.531; P=0.019). In addition, the rate of dyslipidaemias was lower among HCV-monoinfected than HIV/HCV-coinfected patients (29.5% vs 50.5; P=0.002). White race was also an independent predictor of dyslipidaemia (73.8% vs 50.7%; RR=2.32; 95% CI=1.44-3.76; P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: HCV coinfection independently predicted lower rates of dyslipidaemia among HIV-infected patients. An analysis of lipid kinetics among mono- and coinfected patients may elucidate the mechanisms of the apparent protective effect of HCV infection.     

Risk factors for hepatitis C virus infection in individuals infected with the HIV

BACKGROUND: Except for injecting drug use, other routes of transmission for hepatitis C virus among HIV-AIDS patients have not been consistently described, and risk estimates are often not adjusted for confounding factors. AIMS: To evaluate characteristics associated with hepatitis C virus infection in individuals infected with the HIV. PATIENTS: Cases were patients co-infected by HIV and hepatitis C virus, and controls were infected only by HIV. METHODS: Cases and controls were consecutively enrolled at a public health care outpatient HIV-AIDS reference centre in Porto Alegre, Southern Brazil. RESULTS: A total of 227 cases (63% men; 40.3+/-8.7 years) and 370 controls (44.6% men; 38.9+/-9.8 years) were enrolled in the study. In a multiple logistic regression model, male gender (odds ratio 1.9; 95% confidence interval 1.3-2.7), age between 30 and 49 years (odds ratio 2.1; 95% confidence interval 1.2-3.7), elementary school education (odds ratio 4.2; 95% confidence interval 1.9-9.6), lower family income (odds ratio 1.7; 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.7), sharing personal hygiene objects (odds ratio 2.0; 95% confidence interval 1.3-3.3), using injected drugs (odds ratio 21.6; 95% confidence interval 10.8-43.0) and crack cocaine (odds ratio 2.8; 95% confidence interval 1.1-6.9) were independently associated with co-infection by hepatitis C virus. CONCLUSION: These results confirm the risk profile for hepatitis C virus-HIV infection and suggest that sharing personal hygiene objects might explain the transmission of virus C to those not infected by the usual routes, which may be of relevance for developing preventive strategies.     

The effect of hepatitis C treatment and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection on the disease burden of hepatitis C among injecting drug users in Amsterdam

Aims The hepatitis C virus (HCV) disease burden among injecting drug users (IDUs) is determined by HCV incidence, the long latency period of HCV, competing mortality causes, presence of co‐infection and HCV treatment uptake. We examined the effect of these factors and estimated the HCV disease burden in Amsterdam. Design A Markov model was developed, incorporating HCV and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and parameterized with data from the Amsterdam Cohort Studies, surveillance studies and literature. Setting IDU population of Amsterdam. Measurements HCV infection simulated from its acute phase to HCV‐related liver disease (i.e. decompensated cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma). Findings The HCV prevalence among IDUs in Amsterdam increased to approximately 80% in the 1980s. From 2011 to 2025, the HCV‐related disease prevalence will accordingly rise by 36%, from 57 cases (95% range 33–94) to 78 (95% range 43–138), respectively. In total, 945 (95% range 617–1309) individuals will develop HCV‐related liver disease. This burden would have been 33% higher in the absence of HIV, resulting in 1219 cases (95% range 796–1663). In Amsterdam, 25% of HIV‐negative IDUs receive successful HCV treatment, reducing the cumulative disease burden by 14% to 810 (95% range 520–1120). Further reduction of 36% can be achieved by improving treatment, resulting in 603 cases (95% range 384–851). Conclusions The hepatitis C virus burden among injecting drug users in Amsterdam has been reduced by a high competing mortality rate, particularly caused by HIV infection, and to a smaller extent by hepatitis C virus treatment. Improved hepatitis C virus treatment is expected to contribute to reduce the future hepatitis C virus disease burden.     

Epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection in HIV-infected individuals

Many individuals are infected with both HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. More rapid progression of liver disease is seen, higher levels of HCV RNA encourage transmission and sustained virological responses are lower in coinfected patients. The management of these patients is further complicated by potential interactions between antiretroviral therapy and peginterferon and ribavirin.     

Treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in patients coinfected with HIV in the HIV Outpatient Study (HOPS), 1999–2007

Summary. Liver disease due to hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a leading cause of non‐AIDS‐related morbidity and mortality in patients infected with HIV. We assessed the frequency of and predictors for initiation of treatment for HCV infection among patients coinfected with HCV/HIV enrolled in the HIV Outpatient Study (HOPS) during 1999–2007. We included patients with confirmed HCV infection, at least 1 year of subsequent follow‐up, and no evidence of prior HCV treatment. We assessed predictors of HCV treatment initiation using Cox proportional hazards analyses. During 1999–2007, 103 (20%) HOPS patients coinfected with HCV/HIV initiated HCV treatment during a median of 4.3 years of follow‐up (interquartile range: 2.7, 6.7). In multivariable analysis, non‐Hispanic black race/ethnicity (hazard ratio HR] 0.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.2, 0.6) was independently associated with a lower likelihood of HCV treatment. Elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT; HR 3.5; 95% CI = 2.2, 5.6) and CD4+ cell count ≥500 cells/mm³ (HR 1.8; 95% CI = 1.2, 2.8) at the start of observation were independently associated with higher likelihood of HCV treatment. For patients starting observation in 1999–2001, 2002–2004 and 2005–2007, 5%, 11% and 21% of patients initiated treatment during the first year of follow‐up, respectively. Between 1999 and 2007, despite a stable low fraction of patients coinfected with HCV/HIV initiating treatment for HCV infection, an increasing proportion initiated treatment within the first year after the infection was confirmed. Treatment of HCV infection in patients coinfected with HCV/HIV should be considered a priority, given the increased risk of accelerated end‐stage liver disease.     

Anti-hepatitis C virus treatment may prevent the progression of liver fibrosis in non-responder human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C virus coinfected patients

AimTo evaluate changes in liver histology in patients with human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C virus coinfection non-responders to a suboptimal Interferon + Ribavirine regimen.Materials and methodsWe investigated 49 patients with two sequential liver biopsies: 18 were non-responders to Interferon + Ribavirine treatment (Group hepatitis C virus Rx) administered after the 1st liver biopsy who underwent a 2nd liver biopsy after a median period of 3.92 year and 31 were patients who remained untreated for hepatitis C virus disease (Group hepatitis C virus untreated) after the 1st liver biopsy because of refusal and underwent a 2nd liver biopsy after a median period of 5.05-years. Most patients in both groups were under highly active antiretroviral therapy. At the time of 1st liver biopsy similar degrees of necro-inflammation, fibrosis and steatosis were observed in both groups. Changes in liver lesions between 1st and 2nd liver biopsys were adjusted for different intervals between liver biopsys by a mathematic formula.ResultsLiver fibrosis did not change in 88.9% of patients in Group hepatitis C virus Rx and in 77.4% in Group hepatitis C virus untreated. A marked deterioration in liver fibrosis was observed in 5 (16%) patients in Group hepatitis C virus untreated and in none in Group hepatitis C virus treated. Necro-inflammation and steatosis remained substantially unchanged in both groups.ConclusionLiver histology remained substantially unchanged in human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C virus patients non-responder to anti-hepatitis C virus therapy over 4 years observation, suggesting an effective anti-hepatitis C virus early treatment for all hepatitis C virus/human immunodeficiency virus coinfected patients who can reasonably tolerate therapy.     

Treatment of hepatitis C virus and human immunodeficiency virus coinfection: from large trials to real life

To analyse the barriers for anti-hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) treatment in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-HCV coinfected patients, we surveyed 71 physicians specializing in infectious disease (39%), internal medicine (27%), HIV/AIDS information and care (17%), haematology (10%) and hepatology (6%). A standard data collection form was used to identify patients observed in 7 days in November 2004. Three hundred and eighty patients with the following characteristics were included: male gender 71%; mean age 41.5 years; HIV diagnosed 12 years ago; routes of transmission via injection drug use (78%); undetectable HIV viral load (235/373, 63%) or <10 000 copies/mL (86/373, 23%). HCV RNA was positive in 325 of 369 (88%) patients; HCV genotype was 1 or 4 in 65% and liver biopsy had been carried out in 56%. There were several explanations for the nontreatment of HCV in 205 of the 380 (54%) patients, with 2.4 reasons per patient: anti-HCV treatment was deemed questionable (n = 109) because of minor hepatic lesions, alcohol consumption, or active drug use; no liver biopsy had been performed (n = 68); treatment was contraindicated (n = 62), mainly for psychiatric reasons; there was physician conviction of poor patient compliance (n = 62) and patient refusal (n = 33). Patients having received anti-HCV treatment (n = 91) compared with those who had never received any (n = 205) were more commonly of European origin, had better control of their HIV infection, were followed by a hepatologist more often, had a liver biopsy more often and had more commonly a high HCV viral load (P < 0.001). In 'real life' in France in 2004, more than half of the HIV-HCV coinfected patients have never received anti-HCV treatment. The main reasons are a treatment that may be deemed questionable (minimal hepatic lesions, alcohol, active drug use), a lack of available liver biopsy, a psychiatric contraindication and physician conviction of poor patient compliance.     

Liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C and persistently normal liver enzymes: influence of HIV infection

Summary. Liver fibrosis progress slowly in patients with chronic hepatitis C and persistently normal alanine aminotransferase (PNALT) compared to subjects with elevated aminotransferases. Differences in liver fibrosis according to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status in this population have not been examined. All patients with serum hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐RNA and PNALT who underwent liver fibrosis assessment using elastometry since 2004 at three different European hospitals were evaluated. Patients previously treated with interferon were excluded. PNALT was defined as ALT below the upper limit of normality in at least three consecutive determinations within the last 12 months. Fibrosis stage was defined as mild (Metavir F0–F1) if stiffness ≤7.1 kPa; moderate (F2) if 7.2–9.4 kPa; severe (F3) if 9.5–14 kPa, and cirrhosis (F4) if >14 kPa. A total of 449 HIV‐negative and 133 HIV‐positive patients were evaluated. HIV‐negative patients were older (mean age 51.8 vs 43.5 years) and more frequently females (63%vs 37%) than the HIV counterparts. Mean serum HCV‐RNA was similar in both the groups (5.9 vs 5.8 log IU/mL). Overall, 78.8% of the HIV patients were on HAART and their mean CD4 count was 525 (±278) cells/μL. In HIV‐negatives, liver fibrosis was mild in 84.6%; moderate in 8.7%, severe in 3.3% and cirrhosis was found in 3.3%. In HIV patients, these figures were 70.7%, 18.8%, 6%, and 4.5%, respectively. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, older age (odds ratio or OR: 1.04; 95% confidence interval or CI: 1.02–1.07; P < 0.001) and being HIV+ (OR: 2.6; 95% CI: 1.21–5.85; P < 0.01) were associated with severe liver fibrosis or cirrhosis (F3–F4). Thus, severe liver fibrosis and cirrhosis are seen in 6.6% of the HCV‐monoinfected and in 10.5% of HCV‐HIV co‐infected patients with PNALT. Some degree of liver fibrosis that justifies treatment is seen in 15% of the HCV‐monoinfected but doubles to nearly 30% in HIV‐HCV co‐infected patients with PNALT.     

人类免疫缺陷病毒感染者混合感染丙型和乙型肝炎病毒后对高效抗逆转录病毒治疗疗效的影响

目的 观察HIV感染者合并HCV和HBV感染后对高效抗逆转录病毒治疗(HAART)疗效的影响.方法 对某地区HIV、HCV共感染患者166例(HIV+HCV组),HIV、HCV和HBV混合感染患者23例(H1V+HCV+HBV组)及单纯HIV感染者178例,给予1年的HAART治疗,观察3组患者病毒学反应、免疫学反应和肝功能动态变化.以流式细胞仪检测外周血CD4+T淋巴细胞;实时PCR定量检测HCV、HIV和HBV病毒载量.结果 单纯HIV感染组、HIV+HCV+HBV组和HIV+HCV组经HAART 1年后,HIV病毒载量分别由治疗前(6.78±1.08)、(6.23±1.34)、(6.54±1.23)lg拷贝/ml下降至(0.53±0.15)、(0.67±0.16)、(0.43±0.11)lg拷贝/ml(P值均＜0.001).CD4+T淋巴细胞计数分别由治疗前的(197±127)、(184±113)、(213±143)个/μl上升至(382±74)、(383±70)、(378±76)个/μl(P值均＜0.001).3组之间各时间点CD4+T淋巴细胞、HIV病毒载量差异无统计学意义.3组患者ALT、AST、总胆红素治疗前后无显著变化,相同时间点组间比较差异无统计学意义.HAART前后,HCV病毒载量差异无统计学意义.结论 HIV感染者混合感染HBV和(或)HCV,不影响HAART的疗效;HAART对HCV复制无抑制作用.     

Residual risk of transfusion transmitted human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus and human T lymphotrophic virus

BACKGROUND: The risk of transfusion transmitted viral infection is now so low that mathematical modelling is required to estimate the residual risk. The first national viral risk estimates for hepatitis B virus (HBV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) were recently published by the Australian Red Cross Blood Service. Using several refinements to the original methodology, as well as an additional 2 years of data, new risk estimates have been derived. METHODS: Viral screening data for Australian donors for 2000/2003 were retrospectively analysed. The data were applied to three published models to estimate the residual risk of transmitting HIV, HBV, HCV or human T lymphotrophic virus (HTLV) by blood transfusion in Australia. RESULTS: Applying the three models to HBV, HIV and HCV, three point estimates of the residual risk per unit were calculated for each virus. The median point estimates were 1 in 1,339,000 for HBV, 1 in 1 in 7,299,000 for HIV, and 1 in 3,636,000 for HCV. Although the HTLV risk could not be equivalently calculated because of the lack of incident infection it was estimated to be considerably less than 1 in 1,000,000 using a separate method. CONCLUSIONS: The most current and accurate estimate of residual risk of viral transmission in Australia has been provided in the present study. The residual risk in Australia is exceptionally small, continuing to decrease and is generally less than European or US risk estimates. These new estimates demonstrate that for viral transmission the Australian blood supply is amongst the safest in the world, and provide a basis for evaluating the cost benefit of future viral testing methodologies.     

Assessment of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infections and associated risk factors in HIV infected patients at Debretabor hospital,South Gondar,Northwest Ethiopia

ObjectiveTo assess hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus infections and associated risk factors among HIV infected patients at Debretabor hospital.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among HIV/AIDS patients attending Debretabor hospital from February to April, 2012. Venous blood samples were collected from study participants for HBsAg and anti HCV antibody tests. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify associated variables with HBsAg and anti HCV positivity. Variables having P<0.05 was taken as statistically significant association.ResultsFrom a total of 395 HIV infected patients included in this study, 234 (59.2%) were females and 161 (40.8%) males with mean (±SD) age of 36.31 (±9.91) years. The prevalence of HBsAg and anti HCV antibody was 6.1% and 1.3%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, multiple sexual partner (AOR=8.1, 95% CI=1.8–33.97) and history of opportunistic infections (AOR=3.17, 95% CI=1.3–7.7) were statistically associated with HBsAg positivity. History of blood transfusion (AOR=5.61, 95% CI= 1.03-36.59) was associated with presence of anti–HCV antibody.ConclusionsThe prevalence of HBsAg and anti HCV antibodies in HIV coinfected patients was intermediate. However, it is relevant for HIV infected patients since viral hepatitis co-infections in HIV patients can cause multiple complications. Therefore, routine HBV and HCV screening with reliable diagnostic markers need to be carried out for close monitoring and better management in HIV patients.     

Minimal transmission of HIV despite persistently high transmission of hepatitis C virus in a Swedish needle exchange program

The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence and incidence of HIV and hepatitis B and C (HBV and HCV) among injecting drug users in a Swedish needle exchange programme (NEP) and to identify risk factors for blood-borne transmission. A series of serum samples from NEP participants enrolled from 1997 to 2005 were tested for markers of HIV, HBV and HCV (including retrospective testing for HCV RNA in the last anti-HCV-negative sample from each anti-HCV seroconverter). Prevalence and incidence were correlated with self-reported baseline characteristics. Among 831 participants available for follow-up, one was HIV positive at baseline and two seroconverted to anti-HIV during the follow-up of 2433 HIV-negative person-years [incidence 0.08 per 100 person-years at risk (pyr); compared to 0.0 in a previous assessment of the same NEP covering 1990-1993]. The corresponding values for HBV were 3.4/100 pyr (1990-1993: 11.7) and for HCV 38.3/100 pyr (1990-1993: 27.3). HCV seroconversions occurred mostly during the first year after NEP enrolment. Of the 332 cases testing anti-HCV negative at enrolment, 37 were positive for HCV RNA in the same baseline sample (adjusted HCV incidence 31.5/100 pyr). HCV seroconversion during follow-up was significantly associated with mixed injection use of amphetamine and heroin, and a history of incarceration at baseline. In this NEP setting, HIV prevalence and incidence remained low and HBV incidence declined because of vaccination, but transmission of HCV was persistently high. HCV RNA testing in anti-HCV-negative NEP participants led to more accurate identification of timepoints for transmission.     

Patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus demonstrate higher levels of hepatic HCV RNA

Serum and liver hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA levels in patients with hepatitis C have previously been quantified using different techniques. In this work, we used an automated, multicycle, polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based technique to quantify HCV RNA in 1-2 mm of frozen liver tissue, and in serum, from 70 patients with antibodies to HCV (anti-HCV), with and without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection. Stored liver tissue and sera collected at the time of liver biopsy were used for measurement of HCV RNA. Forty-eight HCV patients and 22 HIV/HCV co-infected patients were studied. Co-infected patients had significantly higher median serum and liver HCV RNA (6.7 log copies ml-1 serum and 2.90 log copies microg-1 liver nucleic acids) than patients with HCV alone (6.2 log copies ml-1 serum and 2.19 log copies microg-1 liver nucleic acids). There was only a weak correlation between serum and liver HCV RNA (r = 0.43). There was no correlation between liver and serum HCV RNA and host factors such as duration of disease, CD4 counts, alanine aminotransferase levels or histological score. There was no correlation with HCV genotype. Co-infected patients were more likely to harbour HCV genotype 1 (85%) when compared to patients with HCV alone (58%). An identical genotype was found in liver and serum in 89% of those tested; in 11%, a mixed genotype was present in serum. Patients with HCV genotypes 1 and non-1 had similar histological scores. Hence, an automated PCR-based technique is useful for measuring both liver and serum HCV RNA. Serum HCV genotypes closely paralleled those found in liver tissue. HIV co-infection was associated with higher serum, as well as intrahepatic, HCV RNA levels, by mechanisms not directly related to CD4 counts. The lack of correlation between liver HCV RNA and histology suggests that HCV is not directly cytopathic.