What is the impact of coexistence of hepatolithiasis on cholangiocarcinoma?

BACKGROUND: Hepatolithiasis is a well-known etiology of cholangiocarcinoma. However, whether or not hepatolithiasis influences the presentation of cholangiocarcinoma is not very clear. To help clarify this, we conducted the present study to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics of cholangiocarcinoma with hepatolithiasis. As well, we made a comparison between the presence and absence of hepatolithiasis in patients with cholangiocarcinoma to determine the impact of hepatolithiasis. METHODS: Among 140 patients with histologically proven cholangiocarcinoma at the Taichung Veteran General Hospital between October 1982 and December 2000, 38 were found to have concomitant hepatolithiasis. Patients were evaluated on the basis of age, gender, presenting symptom, laboratory data, preoperative liver function (indocyanine green test), tumor markers, histological differentiation, lymph node involvement, and organ metastasis. Data were statistically analyzed using the chi-squared test and Student's t-test. Analysis of survival was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and univariate analysis and multivariate analyses for survival were performed by Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: The cholangiocarcinoma with hepatolithiasis group (CC + HL) was found to be predominantly female, with more common presentation of fever and less presentation of jaundice (P < 0.05). In addition, patients with cholangiocarcinoma without hepatolithiasis (CC - HL group) had higher serum bilirubin levels and more advanced histological differentiation (P < 0.05). As well, the percentage of resectability of the CC + HL group was higher than that of the CC - HL group, although it was not statistically significant. Univariate and multivariate analyses for overall survival showed that those patients with an age older than 65 years, hypoalbuminemia, poor histological differentiation, and a presence of hepatolithiasis were prone to a graver prognosis, albeit none of them were statistically significant. Resectability was the only independent predictor of a favorable prognosis with significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: The clinicopathological features of cholangiocarcinoma with concomitant hepatolithiasis showed few differences from that without hepatolithiasis. Resectability was the only predictor that favored a good prognosis.     

What is the impact of early rheumatoid arthritis on the individual?

Rheumatoid arthritis has a significant impact on patients' physical, emotional and social functioning that often occurs very early in the disease with the onset of symptoms. Patients therefore come to their consultation with the rheumatologist, having often experienced these symptoms over a period of some months, with specific expectations (for reassurance and diagnosis) and their own understanding and beliefs about the aetiology and prognosis of their symptoms. Information and advice given by rheumatologists will be rejected by patients if it cannot be accommodated within these lay beliefs. The diagnosis itself can cause a variety of reactions, including relief, disbelief, anger, fear and devastation. Following diagnosis, patients are faced with the problems of adapting to a new self-concept, managing their symptoms and trying to assimilate the large amount of information that they are given about their disease, its treatment, preferred health behaviours, prognosis and so on. There are a number of ways in which health professionals can reduce this impact in early disease. Eliciting patients' lay beliefs about the cause of their symptoms will ensure that information given in the consultation is relevant to individual patients and is presented in a way that has meaning for them. Determining patients' expectations of the rheumatologist will ensure that patients' needs for information and reassurance are met and that unrealistic or inappropriate expectations can be discussed and re-negotiated. Understanding patients' attitudes towards treatment interventions will inform shared clinical decision-making and promote adherence. Obtaining this information in the context of a time-limited consultation can be assisted by the use of validated clinical tools, presented as self-completed questionnaires. Further research is needed to determine the content, frequency, timing and methodology of educational interventions in early rheumatoid arthritis and to improve the understanding of the complex interaction between lay beliefs and disease outcome.     

What is the impact of fecal incontinence on quality of life?

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine at what point fecal incontinence affects quality of life. METHODS: In 35 patients who had anterior sphincter repair for fecal incontinence as a result of obstetric injury, continence evaluated by the Wexner score was compared with validated quality of life tests (Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index and Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form General Health Survey). The questionnaires were sent by mail. Thirty-two patients responded. The Wexner score (0–20) was correlated with the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index and the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form General Health Survey and matched with those of reference groups. RESULTS: The mean Wexner score was 8.8, corresponding with losing stools between once a week and once a month. The mean Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index score was 105 (range, 48–136), which is significantly lower than the score found in a reference group of normal individuals. Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form General Health Survey scores were significantly lower in all six dimensions compared with the reference group. A Wexner score of 9 or higher was associated with a Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index score of less than 105, which implies that patients were less mobile in the community and were confined to their homes. A similar correlation was found between a Wexner score higher than 9 and the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form General Health Survey. CONCLUSIONS: A Wexner score of 9 or higher indicates a significant impairment of quality of life and can therefore be used in decision making.     

What is the validity evidence for assessments of clinical teaching?

BACKGROUND: Although a variety of validity evidence should be utilized when evaluating assessment tools, a review of teaching assessments suggested that authors pursue a limited range of validity evidence. OBJECTIVES: To develop a method for rating validity evidence and to quantify the evidence supporting scores from existing clinical teaching assessment instruments. DESIGN: A comprehensive search yielded 22 articles on clinical teaching assessments. Using standards outlined by the American Psychological and Education Research Associations, we developed a method for rating the 5 categories of validity evidence reported in each article. We then quantified the validity evidence by summing the ratings for each category. We also calculated weighted kappa coefficients to determine interrater reliabilities for each category of validity evidence. MAIN RESULTS: Content and Internal Structure evidence received the highest ratings (27 and 32, respectively, of 44 possible). Relation to Other Variables, Consequences, and Response Process received the lowest ratings (9, 2, and 2, respectively). Interrater reliability was good for Content, Internal Structure, and Relation to Other Variables (kappa range 0.52 to 0.96, all P values < .01), but poor for Consequences and Response Process. CONCLUSIONS: Content and Internal Structure evidence is well represented among published assessments of clinical teaching. Evidence for Relation to Other Variables, Consequences, and Response Process receive little attention, and future research should emphasize these categories. The low interrater reliability for Response Process and Consequences likely reflects the scarcity of reported evidence. With further development, our method for rating the validity evidence should prove useful in various settings.     

What is clinical empathy?

Patients seek empathy from their physicians. Medical educators increasingly recognize this need. Yet in seeking to make empathy a reliable professional skill, doctors change the meaning of the term. Outside the field of medicine, empathy is a mode of understanding that specifically involves emotional resonance. In contrast, leading physician educators define empathy as a form of detached cognition. In contrast, this article argues that physicians' emotional attunement greatly serves the cognitive goal of understanding patients' emotions. This has important implications for teaching empathy.     

What is the impact of capsule endoscopy in the long term period?

AIM: To assess the clinical impact of capsule endoscopy(CE) in the long-term follow-up period in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding(OGIB). METHODS: One hundred and forty-one patients who applied CE for OGIB between 2009 and 2012 were retrospectively analyzed, and this cohort was then questioned prospectively. Demographic data of the patients were determined via the presence of comorbid diseases, use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs anticoagulant-antiaggregant agents, previous diagnostic tests for bleeding episodes, CE findings, laboratory tests and outcomes.RESULTS: CE was performed on 141 patients becauseof OGIB. The capsule was retained in the upper gastrointestinal(GI) system in two of the patients, thus video monitoring was not achieved. There were 139 patients [62% male, median age: 72 years(range: 13-93 years) and a median follow-up duration: 32 mo(range: 6-82 mo)]. The overall diagnostic yield of CE was 84.9%. Rebleeding was determined in 40.3%(56/139) of the patients. The rebleeding rates of patients with positive and negative capsule results at the end of the follow-up were 46.6%(55/118) and 4.8%(1/21), respectively. In the multivariate analysis, usage of NSAIDs, anticoagulant-antiaggregant therapies(OR = 5.8; 95%CI: 1.86-18.27) and vascular ectasia(OR = 6.02; 95%CI: 2.568-14.146) in CE were detected as independent predictors of rebleeding. In the univariate analysis, advanced age, comorbidity, and overt bleeding were detected as predictors of rebleeding.CONCLUSION: CE is a reliable method in the diagnosis of obscure GI bleeding. Negative CE correlated with a significantly lower rebleeding risk in the long-term follow-up period.     

What is the impact of disease prevalence upon health technology assessment?

As national budgets for health care will remain under stress for the foreseeable future, health technology assessment (HTA) aimed at offering guidance to policy-making will have an increasing role to play in optimizing resources. The emergence of new treatment paradigms and health technologies, and the prevalence studies which determine when a disease is a current or future burden for patients and the community are in the roots of the HTA process. Analysing studies on screening test strategies and health care policy, this paper revisits two key concepts in epidemiology, prevalence and incidence, in order to show their major impact upon HTA. Utilization of the predictive values of screening tests that include prevalence in their calculations, and analysing all options for screening strategies are necessary in HTA. Cost-effectiveness analyses and statistical models should include potential externalities, especially the impact of prevention and treatment on infectious disease prevalence. Beyond estimates of cost-effectiveness ratios, decision makers also need to know by how much their annual health care budget is likely to increase or decrease in the years following the emergence of new technologies: hence the importance of incidence- or prevalence-based economic evaluations. As new paradigms are occurring, especially in the field of oncology, with treatments targeted to ‘small’ groups of patients identified through genetic testing, prevalence data are strongly needed. Precise estimates of disease prevalence, in general populations as well as in risk or targeted groups, will therefore be necessary to improve HTA process.     

What is the impact of endoscopic vein harvesting on clinical outcomes following coronary artery bypass graft surgery?

Objective Endoscopic vein harvesting (EVH) is increasingly used as an alternative to open vein harvesting (OVH) for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Concerns about the safety of EVH with regard to midterm clinical outcomes following CABG have been raised. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of EVH on short-term and midterm clinical outcomes following CABG. Design This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected multi-centre data. A propensity score was developed for EVH and used to match patients who underwent EVH to those who underwent OVH. Setting Blackpool Victoria Hospital, Plymouth Derriford Hospital and the University Hospital of South Manchester were the main study settings. Patients There were 4709 consecutive patients who underwent isolated CABG using EVH or OVH between January 2008 and July 2010. Main outcome measures The main outcome measure was a combined end point of death, repeat revascularisation or myocardial infarction. Secondary outcome measures included in-hospital morbidity, in-hospital mortality and midterm mortality. Results Compared to OVH, EVH was not associated with an increased risk of the main outcome measure at a median follow-up of 22 months (HR 1.15; 95% CI 0.76 to 1.74). EVH was also not associated with an increased risk of in-hospital morbidity, in-hospital mortality (0.9% vs 1.1%, p=0.71) or midterm mortality (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.65 to 1.66). Conclusions This multi-centre study demonstrates that at a median follow-up of 22 months, EVH was not associated with adverse short-term or midterm clinical outcomes. However, before the safety of EVH can be clearly determined, further analyses of long-term clinical outcomes are required.     

What is the clinical significance of bone loss in primary hyperparathyroidism?

To help determine the clinical significance of the bone loss associated with primary hyperparathyroidism, we studied the prevalence of vertebral fractures in a group of patients with this disorder. From a registry of parathyroidectomies, 206 cases were reviewed, and lateral chest roentgenograms were studied for the presence of fractures. All roentgenograms were interpreted by two of the investigators who were "blinded" to diagnoses. Comparisons of readings were made that assured interrater agreement. A group of patients who underwent cholecystectomy served as controls. Studied in a logistic regression analysis model, controlling for the effects of age, sex, and race, primary hyperparathyroidism was found to be significantly associated with vertebral fractures. Subgroup analyses performed on the patients with hyperparathyroidism failed to identify specific biochemical or clinical markers associated with fractures. Our results suggest that the bone loss of primary hyperparathyroidism is clinically significant, leading not only to decreased bone densities but also to an increased prevalence of fractures.     

What is the impact of diabetes for Australian Aboriginal women when pregnant?

The impact differential of diabetes for Aboriginal maternal and infant health outcomes is different to Caucasian outcomes. With maternal diabetes, Aboriginal infant's birth weight increases and stillbirth rate is 22/1000 for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and 53/1000 for pre-existing diabetes while for Caucasian infant's birth weight decreases and stillbirth rate is 3/1000 for GDM and 11/1000 for pre-existing diabetes. Equity of services is required to achieve equality of health outcomes.