Post-caesarean section analgesia: a comparison of epidural butorphanol and morphine

Epidural butorphanol 1, 2 and 4 mg were compared with morphine, 5 mg, for postoperative analgesia in 92 consenting, healthy, term parturients who had undergone Caesarean section under epidural lidocaine anaesthesia in a randomized double-blind study. Postoperative pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale and recorded with heart rate, blood pressure and respiratory rate. The demographic characteristics, and the incidences of primary and repeat Caesarean sections, were not different among the four treatment groups. At 15, 30, 45 and 60 min after treatment the median pain scores following butorphanol were similar and lower than those following morphine (P less than 0.05). Calculated median percentage pain relief values for butorphanol were higher than morphine at each of these times (P less than 0.05). At 90 min and 2 hr the pain scores and pain relief values were similar. Beyond 45 min the number of patients requesting supplemental medication and dropping out of the study increased progressively in both the butorphanol and morphine treated patients. The attrition profiles for butorphanol were different from morphine (P less than 0.01). The median time in the study was greater than 24 hr for morphine, and 3, 2.5 and 4 hr for butorphanol, 1, 2 or 4 mg, respectively. No patient developed a clinically important change in heart rate or blood pressure, and none experienced a decrease in respiratory rate below 12 breaths.min-1. One of 69 patients (1.4 per cent) who received butorphanol developed pruritus compared with ten (43 per cent) of 23 patients who received morphine. The global assessments of the adequacy of analgesia were indistinguishable between morphine and butorphanol. Epidural butorphanol provides safe, effective postoperative analgesia, has a prompt onset, and a limited duration.     

Epidural opioid analgesia after Caesarean section: a comparison of patient-controlled analgesia with meperidine and single bolus injection of morphine

The quality of analgesia, patient satisfaction and incidence of side effects following a single bolus of epidural morphine were compared with patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with meperidine during the first 24 hr after elective Caesarean section. Seventy-five women were randomly assigned to three equal groups. Group 1 received 30 mg epidural meperidine after delivery and PCEA with meperidine; Group 2 received 3 mg epidural morphine after delivery and PCEA with saline in a double-blind fashion. Group 3 received 3 mg epidural morphine after delivery without saline PCEA. Visual analogue pain scores (VAS) were higher with PCEA meperidine from 8–16 hr postoperatively (P < 0.05) than in both epidural morphine groups. Two patients in Group 1 and one in Group 3 required supplemental parenteral analgesia. The incidence of nausea was 16% in Group 1, compared with 52% in Group 2 and 56% in Group 3 (P < 0.01). Pruritus occurred in 24% of Group 1 patients, 84% of patients in Group 2 and 68% of patients in Group 3 (P< 0.001). Forty-six percent of patients in Group 1 were very satisfied with pain management, compared with 77% in Group 2 and 79% in Group 3. Nurse workload was higher in the PCEA study groups than in Group 3 (P< 0.05). A single bolus of epidural morphine provides superior analgesia and satisfaction at low cost, but with a higher incidence of nausea and pruritus than PCEA with meperidine.     

A comparative study of patient-controlled epidural fentanyl and single dose epidural morphine for post-caesarean analgesia

In a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study, 23 patients who had undergone Caesarean delivery under epidural anaesthesia were assessed to evaluate the effectiveness of patientcontrolled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with fentanyl compared with a single dose of epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia. Group A (n = 11) received epidural fentanyl 100 μg intraoperatively, then self-administered a maximum of two epidural fentanyl boluses 50 μg (10 μg · ml^?1) with a lockout period of five minutes for a maximum of two doses per hour. Group B (n = 11) received a single bolus of epidural morphine 3 mg (0.5 mg · ml^?1) intraoperatively and received the same instructions as Group A but had their PCA devices filled with 0.9% NaCl. Patients were assessed up to 24 hr for pain, satisfaction with pain relief, nausea and pruritus using visual analogue scales (VAS). The treatments for inadequate analgesia, nausea and pruritus as well as time to first independent ambulation were recorded. The ventilatory response to carbon dioxide challenge was measured at four and eight hours. Pain relief, satisfaction with pain relief, and the use of supplemental analgesics were similar in both groups. The mean 24 hr dose of epidural fentanyl used by group A patients was 680 μg. Pruritus was less common in Group A patients at the 8 and 24 hr observation periods (P < 0.0125). Both groups experienced the same degree of nausea and clinically unimportant respiratory depression. We conclude that PCEA with fentanyl provides analgesia equal to a single dose of epidural morphine and may be suitable for patients who have experienced considerable pruritus after epidural morphine adminstration.     

Side effects during continuous epidural infusion of morphine and fentanyl

Respiratory effects, nausea, somnolence, and pruritus were compared during a 48-hr period of continuous epidural morphine (n = 34) and fentanyl (n = 32) infusion in 66 patients following elective total replacement of the hip or knee joint. Respiratory effects were assessed by PaCO2. Side effects were assessed by visual analogue scale and considered to be present when the score was above 30. Assessment was made at preoperative visits then 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hr after the epidural injection. The bolus dose and subsequent infusion rate were 3,900 +/- 1,300 micrograms and 427 +/- 213 micrograms.hr-1 for morphine, and 85 +/- 46 micrograms and 56 +/- 27 micrograms.hr-1 for fentanyl. Pain relief was similar in both groups. In the morphine group, PaCO2 elevation and nausea occurred over a period of more than 12 hr (P less than 0.05). In the fentanyl group, there was no PaCO2 change, and nausea was confined to the first few hours. Nausea was more severe (P less than 0.01 at six hours and more frequent (24 hr cumulative incidence, 53 vs 28%, P less than 0.05) in the morphine group. Somnolence was prominent within several hours in two-thirds of patients in both groups. Somnolence continued to decline thereafter in the morphine group, but it was demonstrable in approximately half of the patients throughout the second day in the fentanyl group. The incidence was higher in the fentanyl group at the 48th hr (P less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Epidural morphine for analgesia after Caesarean section: a report of 4880 patients

This retrospective study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of epidural morphine in providing analgesia following Caesarean section under epidural anaesthesia. The morphine was administered as a single bolus, following delivery, in doses ranging from 2 to 5 mg. The charts of 4880 Caesarean sections, performed on 4500 patients, were reviewed. The duration of analgesia and the occurrence of any symptoms which might be side-effects of the epidural morphine were recorded. The duration of analgesia was 22.9 +/- 10.1 hr and was not correlated with the dose of epidural morphine. Eleven per cent of the patients required no supplemental analgesia during the first 48 hr. Twelve patients (0.25 per cent) had respiratory rates less than 10 breaths per minute, on at least one occasion. No serious sequelae resulted from these periods of bradypnoea. Pruritus occurred in 58 per cent of patients, nausea and vomiting in 39.9 per cent and dizziness in ten per cent. Herpes simplex labialis was recorded in 3.5 per cent of patients. Epidural morphine is thus confirmed as an effective analgesic technique post-Caesarean section with 3 mg being the optimal dose. Even in this young healthy patient population, clinically detectable respiratory depression occurs so clinical respiratory monitoring is indicated.     

Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) using fentanyl in a parturient with a platelet function abnormality

A term parturient with documented platelet dysfunction presented to the case room for induction of labour. Since this bleeding abnormality contraindicated the use of lumbar epidural analgesia (LEA), we elected to use an iv fentanyl patientcontrolled analgesia (PCA) technique for pain relief during labour. The patient received a 50 μg fentanyl loading dose after which 20 μg boluses of fentanyl were self-administered every three minutes as required. The patient received a total of 400 μg of fentanyl over the 3 1/2 hr of active labour. Mother and neonate tolerated the fentanyl without sequelae. If facilities to monitor the neonate and mother are present, this method of analgesia is useful in those patients where LEA is contraindicated. Au terme d’une grossesse, une patiente porteuse d’une dysfonction plaquettaire devait avoir une induction de travail au bloc obstétrical. Ecartant l’usage d’une epidurale à cause des risques de saignement, nous avons employé du fentanyl en autoanalgésie (PCA) pour soulager les douleurs du travail. Après une dose initiate de50 μg, la patiente s’injectait des doses de 20 μg de fentanyl iv aux 3 minutes prn. Elle utilisa un total de 400 μg de fentanyl au cours des 3,5 heures que dura le travail. La mère et le nouveau-né tolérèrent fort bien ce mode d’analgésie. L’autoanalgésie offre done une alternative au bloc épidural lorsque ce dernier est contre-indiqué toutefois, nous recommandons de monitorer la mére et le nouveau-né pendant quelques heures.     

A comparison of two doses of epidural fentanyl during Caesarean section

A prospective, randomized, double-blind study was performed to compare the analgesic efficacy and side effects of epidural fentanyl, 25 pg vs 50 pg, when used to supplement epidural anaesthesia for elective Caesarean section. Fifty ASA I and II patients were randomized into two groups: Group I (n =24) received 25 pg and Group II (n = 26) received 50 pg of epidural fentanyl after the epidural test dose. No differences between the two groups were found on any measures of intraoperative pain, nausea, drowsiness, respiratory depression, hypotension, pruritus and neonatal outcome. The low levels of pain experienced by patients indicates that doses higher than 50 μg of epidural fentanyl are usually unnecessary for optimal analgesia.     

Butorphanol compared with fentanyl in general anaesthesia for ambulatory laparoscopy

Butorphanol was compared with fentanyl as the narcotic component of general anaesthesia for ambulatory laparoscopic surgery. This double-blind, randomized study enrolled 60 healthy women who received equianalgesic doses of fentanyl 1 microgram.kg-1 (F, n = 30) or butorphanol 20 micrograms.kg-1 (B, n = 30) prior to induction of anaesthesia. Tracheal anaesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide/oxygen, isoflurane, and succinylcholine by infusion. Intraoperatively, patients who received B demonstrated lower pulse rate before and after intubation (P less than 0.05, P less than 0.01) and lower diastolic blood pressure after intubation (P less than 0.01). Anesthesiologists judged the maintenance phase as satisfactory more often with B (P less than 0.05). Postoperatively, there were no differences in analgesic need. No major side-effects occurred in either group. Among minor side-effects, patients who received B reported postoperative sedation more often, 77% vs 37% (P less than 0.01), which occurred during the first 45 min of recovery (P less than 0.05). Discharge times were not different. On the first postoperative day, more subjects who received B were satisfied with their anaesthesia experience (P less than 0.05). Butorphanol 20 micrograms.kg-1 is an acceptable alternative analgesic in general anaesthesia for ambulatory laparoscopy.     

Intrathecal meperidine for elective Caesarean section: a comparison with lidocaine

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of intrathecal meperidine in patients undergoing Caesarean section, and also to compare meperidine with heavy lidocaine. Fifty fall-term pregnant women, ASA physical status I or II, presenting for elective Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were randomly divided into two groups with 25 in each, to receive either intrathecal meperidine or lidocaine. All patients received premedication with oral ranitidine, 150 mg, the night before surgery, and again two hours before surgery. Patients in the meperidine group were also given metoclopramide iv 10 mg one hour before surgery. After iv 20 ml·kg^?1 Ringer’s lactate, patients were given either 5% meperidine 1 mg · kg^?1 or 5% heavy lidocaine 1.2 to 1.4 ml intrathecally. The sensory and motor blockades in all except two patients in each group who required sedation at the time of skin incision were adequate for surgery. None of the mothers suffered from any major side effects. The incidence of hypotension was higher in the lidocaine group than in meperidine group (P < 0.05). Pruritus and drowsiness were more common in meperidine group than in lidocaine group (P < 0.01). All the newborns in both groups cried immediately after birth and had an Apgar scope > 7. The mean duration of postoperative analgesia was six hours in the meperidine group and one hour in the lidocaine group (P < 0.01). Postoperative analgesia requirement was less in the meperidine than in the lidocaine group (P < 0.01). It is concluded that intrathecal 5% meperidine in a dose of 1 mg·kg^?1 is superior to 5% heavy lidocaine because of the prolonged postoperative analgesia. The commercial 5% solution of meperidine can be used, without addition, for this purpose.     

Awareness detection during Caesarean section under general anaesthesia using EEG spectrum analysis

This study examined the relationship between the EEG (spectral edge frequency 90 — SEF90) and the occurrence of awareness defined for the purpose of this study as responsiveness to verbal commands. Fifty women undergoing general anaesthesia for elective Caesarean section were examined. Responsiveness to verbal commands was detected every minute in the period from the induction of anaesthesia to the delivery of the newborn using the Tunstall isolated forearm technique and correlated with the SEF90 value. The patients were assigned by a randomized code to receive either thiopentone (4 mg · kg^{− 1}) or ketamine (1 mg · kg^{− 1})for induction of anaesthesia. Before the administration of succinylcholine a tourniquet was applied to the free arm, and inflated to 200 mmHg, to maintain motor function to one arm. The EEG recordings started five minutes before induction and were recorded throughout anaesthesia. The incidence of responsiveness to verbal commands was lower in the ketamine group (24%) where the average SEF90 was 12.0 ± 3 Hz, than in the thiopentone group (52%), where the average SEF90 was 18.09 ± 3 Hz(P = 0.01). The results suggest that SEF values of ≤ 8.6 Hz were sufficient to avoid responsiveness to verbal commands. Cette ’etude évalue la relation entre l’analyse de fréquence spectrale (spectral edge frequency 90 — SEF90) sur l’EEG et l’éveil intra-opératoire défini dans cette étude comme une réponse à un ordre verbal. L’étude inclut 50 parturientes opérées sous anesthésie générale pour une césarienne élective. Nous avons décelé les réponses à un ordre verbal a chaque minute en corrélation avec les valeurs du SEF90 pendant l’induction jusqu’à la naissance, en utilisant sur l’avant-bras la technique de Tunstall du garot isolant. Les patientes ont été réparties au hasard pour recevoir soit du thiopentone (4 mg · kg^{− 1}) soit de la kétamine (1 mg · kg^{− 1})pour l’induction. Avant l’administration intraveineuse de succinylcholine, un garot isolant a été appliqué sur l’avant-bras et gonflé à 200 mmHg pour conserver l’activité motrice de l’avant-bras. L’EEG a éte enregistré 5 min avant l’induction et pendant l’anesthésie. L’incidence des réponses à des ordres verbaux a été inférieure dans le groupe kétamine (24%) (SEF90 moyenne 12,0 ± 3 Hz) comparativement au groupe thiopentone (52%) (SEF90 moyenne 18,09 ± 3). Ces résultats suggèrent qu’une valeur de SEF inférieure à 8.6 Hz suffit pour prévenir la réponse aux ordres verbaux.     

Epidural nalbuphine for analgesia following caesarean delivery: dose-response and effect of local anaesthetic choice

The analgesic profile of epidural nalbuphine for postoperative pain relief and the impact of local anaesthetic choice upon this profile was investigated in 58 patients undergoing elective Caesarean delivery under epidural anaesthesia. Patients were randomized to receive either lidocaine 2% with 1:200,000 epinephrine or 2-chloroprocaine 3% for perioperative anaesthesia, followed by either 10, 20, or 30 mg of epidural nalbuphine administered at the first complaint of postoperative discomfort. Postoperative analgesia was quantitated on a visual analogue (VAS) scale, and by the time from the epidural opioid injection until the first request for supplemental pain medication. The duration of analgesia after lidocaine anaesthesia followed by 10, 20 or 30 mg nalbuphine was 77 (53-127) min, 205 (110-269) min, and 185 (116-241), respectively (median, 95% confidence interval, P less than 0.01, 20 and 30 mg vs 10 mg). Following 2-chloroprocaine anaesthesia, VAS remained consistently elevated: the median duration of analgesia was only 30-40 min and did not differ among the three doses of nalbuphine. Side-effects consisted only of somnolence, and were noted only following lidocaine anaesthesia. Somnolence was observed in 0, 20% and 50% of those receiving 10 mg, 20 mg and 30 mg of nalbuphine respectively (NS). No evidence of respiratory depression was noted in any patient. It is concluded that 20 or 30 mg of epidural nalbuphine provides analgesia for only two to four hours following Caesarean delivery with lidocaine anaesthesia, but anaesthesia with 2-chloroprocaine resulted in minimal or no analgesia from this opioid. Nalbuphine appears to be a disappointing agent for epidural use after Caesarean delivery.     

Bupivacaine 0.1% does not improve postoperative epidural fentanyl analgesia after abdominal or thoracic surgery

Epidural infusions of fentanyl, in a 10 micrograms.ml-1 concentration, combined with bupivacaine 0.1% were compared with epidural infusions of fentanyl alone for postoperative analgesia following abdominal or thoracic surgery. There were no detectable differences between the two groups in analgesia (mean visual analogue scale pain scores ranging between 15-35 mm), average infusion rates of 7-9 ml.hr-1, and serum fentanyl concentrations which reached 1-2 ng.ml-1. There was no difference in postoperative pulmonary function (pH, PaCO2, SaO2), or bowel function (time to flatus or po fluids). The incidence of side-effects including somnolence, nausea and vomiting, pruritus and postural hypotension was also similar. Of the patients receiving fentanyl and bupivacaine 0.1%, three developed a transient unilateral sensory loss to pinprick and ice, and two of these patients had unilateral leg weakness equal to a Bromage 1 score. The addition of bupivacaine 0.1% does not improve epidural infusions of fentanyl using a 10 micrograms.ml-1 concentration following abdominal or thoracic surgery.     

Delayed awakening from general anaesthesia in a patient with Hunter syndrome

Hunter syndrome is one of a heterogeneous group of recessively inherited mucopolysaccharide storage diseases (MPS) with similar biochemical defects manifested by impairments in muco-polysaccharide catabolism with variable but progressive clinical courses. Abnormal accumulation and deposition of mucopoly-saccharides in the tissues of several organs lead to numerous anatomical, musculoskeletal and neurological abnormalities which are known to complicate anaesthetic and airway management. Hunter syndrome has a wide variance of clinical phenotypes ranging from mild to severe. We present a patient having physical and neurological features consistent with a severe clinical presentation of Hunter syndrome (MPS, Type II). Following a seemingly uneventful intraoperative anaesthetic course including isoflurane, nitrous oxide and fentanyl (0.93 μg · kg⁻¹), resumption of spontaneous ventilation and return to consciousness were delayed until intravenous naloxone (200 μg) was administered 100 min after the opioid administration. The cause of delayed recovery from anaesthesia in this patient is unknown. La maladie de Hunter fait partie du groupe des affections hétérogènes héréditaires et récessives des mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) avec lesquelles elle partage les mêmes anomalies biochimiques. Celles-ci se manifestent par des altérations du catabolisme des mucopolysaccharides et une évolution variable et progressive. L’accumulation anormale de mucopolysaccharides dans les tissus de plusieurs organes provoque de nombreuses lésions musculo-squelettiques et neurologiques qui compliquent la gestion de l’anesthésie et des voies aériennes. Les phénotypes cliniques de la maladie de Hunter varient de légers à graves. Cette observation porte sur un patient qui présente des manifestations cliniques graves de la maladie de Hunter (MPS type II). A la suite d’une anesthésie sans problèmes réalisée avec de l’isoflurane, du protoxyde d’azote, et du fentanyl (0,93 μg · kg⁻¹), le retour normal à la ventilation spontanée et à la conscience est retardé jusqu’à l’administration de naloxone (200 mg) iv effectuée 110 min après le morphinique. La raison de ce retard est inconnue.     

Continuous opioid infusions for neurosurgical procedures: a double-blind comparison of alfentanil and fentanyl

The ability of continuous infusions of opioids to control hypertension at the end of neurosurgical procedures without compromising prompt emergence was studied in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial tumours. Four infusion regimens were compared in a randomized double-blind fashion; three of alfentanil and one of fentanyl. Low-dose alfentanil was administered to nine patients (35.1 micrograms.kg-1 then a continuous infusion of 16.2 micrograms.kg-1.hr-1); mid-dose alfentanil to eight patients (70.2 micrograms.kg-1 then 32.4 micrograms.kg-1.hr-1); high-dose alfentanil to eight patients (105.3 micrograms.kg-1 then 48.6 micrograms.kg-1.hr-1). Eight additional patients were given fentanyl (8.3 micrograms.kg-1 then 1.6 micrograms.kg-1.hr-1). Using published values for the pharmacokinetic variables of alfentanil and fentanyl, modelling predicted stable concentrations of 60, 120, 180 ng.ml-1 for the alfentanil infusion regimens respectively and 2 ng.ml-1 with the fentanyl regimen. Maintenance anaesthesia comprised the opioid infusion, 50% N2O in O2 and isoflurane titrated to control mean arterial pressure (MAP) within 20% of ward MAP. Isoflurane was discontinued after closure of the dura. Nitrous oxide was discontinued at the same time as reversal of neuromuscular blockade. The opioid infusion was discontinued with closure of the galea. A greater time-averaged isoflurane concentration was required to control MAP within the prescribed limits in the low alfentanil group (ANOVA; P less than 0.05). The PaCO2 at two, five and 30 min after extubation were not different among groups. The times from discontinuing N2O to eye opening and tracheal extubation were not different. The time to follow commands was longer in the low alfentanil group (P less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Disposition of propofol infusions for caesarean section

The disposition of propofol was studied in women undergoing elective Caesarean section. Indices of maternal recovery and neonatal assessment were correlated with venous concentrations of propofol. After induction of anaesthesia with propofol 2.0 mg.kg-1, ten patients received propofol 6 mg.kg-1.hr-1 with nitrous oxide 50 per cent in oxygen (low group) and nine were given propofol 9 mg.kg-1.hr-1 with oxygen 100 per cent (high group). Pharmacokinetic variables were similar between the groups. The mean +/- SD Vss = 2.38 +/- 1.16 L.kg-1, Cl = 39.2 +/- 9.75 ml.min-1.kg-1 and t1/2 beta = 126 +/- 68.7 min. At the time of delivery (8-16 min), the concentration of propofol ranged from 1.91-3.82 micrograms.ml-1 in the maternal vein (MV), 1.00-2.00 micrograms.ml-1 in the umbilical vein (UV) and 0.53-1.66 micrograms.ml-1 in the umbilical artery (UA). Neonates with high UV concentrations of propofol at delivery had lower neurologic and adaptive capacity scores 15 minutes later. The concentrations of propofol were similar between groups during the infusion but they declined at a faster rate in the low group postoperatively. Maternal recovery times did not depend on the total dose of propofol but the concentration of propofol at the time of eye opening was greater in the high group than the low group (1.74 +/- 0.51 vs 1.24 +/- 0.32 micrograms.ml-1, P less than 0.01). The rapid placental transfer of propofol during Caesarean section requires propofol infusions to be given cautiously, especially when induction to delivery times are long.     

Maternal death following epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean section delivery in a patient with unsuspected sepsis

Sepsis in the parturient may be difficult to recognize in light of the physiologial changes associated with pregnancy. The purposes of this report are to highlight the signs and symptoms which indicate an underlying septic process and the management of these patients in the peripartum period. This 32-yr-old GII PI woman with twin gestation presented at 36 wk in labour. Her temperature was 35.3° C, she was normotensive and had a normal white blood cell count. After epidural anaesthesia was administered for Caesarean section, she became apnoeic, pulseless and unresponsive. Despite aggressive cardiopulmonary resuscitation, neither she nor her twin babies survived. Post mortem blood work revealed a considerable left shift of her white blood count (>60% bands) and an onion gap acidosis. Autopsy revealed evidence of widespread Group A beta-haemolytic streptococcal sepsis. Diagnosis of sepsis in the parturient involves assessment of the patient’s temperature, WBC and differential and acid-base status. Evaluation of the intra-vascular volume must precede anaesthetic intervention. Epidural anaesthesia may be considered in the labouring and Caesarean section patient who has been fluid-resuscitated. Emergency operative delivery may result in cardiovascular compromise in the patient with severe sepsis.     

Regional anaesthesia for hernia repair in children: local vs caudal anaesthesia

The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of local anaesthesia (LA) with that of caudal anaesthesia (CA) on postoperative care of children undergoing inguinal hernia repair. This was a randomized, single-blind investigation of 202 children aged 1–13 yr. Anaesthesia was induced with N₂O/O₂ and halothane or propofol and maintained with N₂O/O₂/halothane. Local anaesthesia included ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block plus subcutaneous injection by the surgeon of up to 0.3 ml · kg^?1 bupivacaine 0.25% with 5 μg · kg^?1 adrenaline. The dose for caudal anaesthesia was 1 ml · kg^?1 up to 20 ml bupivacaine 0.2% with 5 μg · kg^?1 adrenaline. Postoperative pain was assessed with mCHEOPS in the anaesthesia recovery room, with postoperative usage of opioid and acetaminophen in the hospital, and with parental assessment of pain with a VAS. Vomiting, time to first ambulation and first urination were recorded. The postoperative pain scores and opioid usage were similar; however, the LA-group required more acetaminophen in the Day Care Surgical Unit. The incidence of vomiting and the times to first ambulation and first urination were similar. The LA-patients had a shorter recovery room stay (40 ± 9 vs 45 ± 15 min, P < 0.02). The postoperative stay was prolonged in the CA group (176 ± 32 vs 165 ± 26 min, P = 0.02). We conclude that LA and CA have similar effects on postoperative care with only slight differences.     

Comparison of lidocaine CO2, two per cent lidocaine hydrochloride and pH adjusted lidoaine hydrochloride for caesarean section anaesthesia

Lidocaine can be prepared in a variety of ways which may affect the characteristics of neural blockade achieved. Experimental evidence is equivocal as to the clinical impact of the use of different lidocaine preparations. A randomized, double-blind study was performed to investigate the differences in epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean section using three different lidocaine solutions: lidocaine CO2, two per cent lidocaine and two per cent lidocaine with its pH adjusted by the addition of bicarbonate. No differences were found among the groups in time of onset of neural blockade, quality or duration of neural blockade, time to delivery of the infant or volume of anaesthetic solution injected into the epidural space. A significant difference was found between the pH's of the solutions used. It is concluded that all three solutions are equally efficacious in epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean section.     

Comparison of perioperative mental function after general anaesthesia and spinal anaesthesia with intravenous sedation

This study compared the postoperative mental function in 44 elderly patients following general anaesthesia (GA) or spinal anaesthesia (SA) with sedation for transurethral resection of prostate. The Mini-Mental State (MMS) was done preoperatively and postoperatively at six hours, one day, three days, five days and one month. The geriatric mental status examination was performed preoperatively and one month after the anaesthetic. There was no significant intergroup difference in the MMS score in the preoperative, six hours, one day, three days, five days and 30 days postoperative scores between the GA and SA with sedation groups. A significant intragroup difference between preoperative and postoperative MMS score was detected in the GA group (P less than 0.02) and in the SA group with sedation (P less than 0.03). In the GA group, the significant decrease in MMS score occurred at 6 h postoperatively (P less than 0.002) whereas in the SA group with sedation, MMS score also decreased significantly at 6 h (P less than 0.005). In conclusion, there was no significant difference in perioperative mental function between the general and spinal anaesthetic groups when supplemental IV sedation was given. In both groups, perioperative mental function decreased significantly at 6 h postoperatively.     

Wenckebach type heart block following spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section

A case is described of complete heart block during spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section in a fit 23 yr-old-woman. This developed shortly after the institution of the block, with the height of the block below T5 and in the absence of hypotension. The patient was resuscitated successfully with vagolytic and alpha-agonist drugs. A Wenckebach block persisted for a short period postoperatively. The importance of instituting monitoring before the beginning of anaesthesia and the immediate availability of atropine and alpha-agonists before the initiation of spinal anaesthesia is stressed.